urgent help required

hello friends i am running qmail-1.03 applied qmail-ldap-2000601.patch , i have only single domain , with around 200,000 users , now i want that mails for : [EMAIL PROTECTED] will gets forwaded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , i have specified this in ldap mailforwarding attribute , but

Re: Linux Mandrake qmail packages available

On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 10:21:53AM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote: change (once I get DJB's blessing I hope!). The following packages are part of the package: qmail-1.03-7mdk.i386.rpm daemontools-0.70-3mdk.i386.rpm dot-forward-0.51-2mdk.i386.rpm fastforward-0.51-2mdk.i386.rpm

RFC2487 TLS authenticated SMTP relay

So I applied the RFC2487 patch from Frederik Vermeulen, and it works really well from what testing I've done at allowing SSL tunnels between MTAs. I haven't had any problems with that functionality. Now I'm trying to use the client authentication aspect of the patch to provide for authenticated

Re: RFC2487 TLS authenticated SMTP relay

that using TLS seemed so much cooler. I haven't tried the "Authenticated" SMTP patches, I get the feeling that those methods aren't really standards drivin. (anyone?) So that being said ... they are :) SMTP AUTH is documented in ESMTP RFC (forgot the number). Kris

Re: RFC2487 TLS authenticated SMTP relay

Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote: they are :) SMTP AUTH is documented in ESMTP RFC (forgot the number). Ah, well TLS still has a higher "swank factor". ;) Though maybe if none of this works out due to client bugs I can go that route assuming the auth handshake happens after switching to TLS.

very urgent help required

-- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 2:05:00 AST Subject: urgent help required hello friends i am running qmail-1.03 applied qmail-ldap-2000601.patch , i have only single domain , with around 200,000 users , now i want that mails

friends very urgent help required

-- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 4:32:24 AST Subject: very urgent help required -- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 2:05:00 AST Subject: urgent help required hello friends

Re: qmail and MRTG

The one present at http://x42.com/qmail/ are still only for cyclog so you should definitively have a chance. Does the script run from crontab have reading rights? /magnus The mail logs are owned by qmaill user. I ran the script from qmaill and also from root with no luck at all. Even

RE: assign problem

Clemens, I think the answer to your problem is to change the line in your users/assign, +domain-com:username:uid:gid:userhomedir::: to, +domain-com:username:uid:gid:userhomedir:-:: I'm not completely sure, however... (over to the people who *really* understand users/assign...) cheers,

qmail Digest 21 Aug 2000 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1099

qmail Digest 21 Aug 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1099 Topics (messages 47042 through 47070): Re: why they reject my mail 47042 by: Alexander Jernejcic 47045 by: Ricardo Cerqueira 47049 by: Scott D. Yelich qmail and MRTG 47043 by: pgracia.amira.es 47046 by:

Re: assign problem

Clemens, Hi Andrew, I think the answer to your problem is to change the line in your users/assign, +domain-com:username:uid:gid:userhomedir::: to, +domain-com:username:uid:gid:userhomedir:-:: hmmm, the "+domain-com:username:uid:gid:userhomedir:::" version works fine. the

RE: friends very urgent help required

Prashant, I'd echo Brett's sentiment - whatever advice you get from this list is free, so I think its readers don't appreciate message that hassle them. Anyway, another approach, depending on your setup (as Brett says, you're not helping by not telling us much about your setup), you may wish to

SMTP port 25

Hi, Just wonder if anybody had successfully run SMTP on port other than the defined 25 ??? Is there a proxy for SMTP Thanks kayleigh

RE: SMTP port 25

Running on anything other than port 25 is pretty silly considering that all applications and all mail relays attempt to deliver to port 25 on every mail server in the world...Internally, you could do it, but why? If you need to proxy port 25 to some other port, try searching on freshmeat for

RE: FW: qmail domain heiarchy

Hint: smtp and pop3 are not valid answers. If implemented well, and smartly, they can work (as I have done)...took me about three weeks, but the system is secure, efficient, low bandwidth and user-friendly. For internal mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the e-mail is attempted to be sent locally. If

Re: qmail uses FQDN when sending from PHP

Jim, Hmm. It's not clear where your confusion lies. However, you may like to set control/defaulthost (that's normally /var/qmail/control/defaulthost); here's the section of the qmail-inject man page: . defaulthost .Default host name. Default: me, if that is supplied; .

Re: qmail uses FQDN when sending from PHP

PHP use's host+domainname. When sending mail from PHP I use something like this. Sean Truman www.prodigysolutions.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- PHP starts here ? // Set SMTP server variables. $smtp_server = "localhost"; $smtp_port = 25; // Set Other SMTP

Re: qmail and IP addresses.....

On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 11:57:47PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote: It could be done for outgoing, but nobody has written such a patch. http://www.qmail.org/outgoingip.patch ? :) For what it's worth, Dan Bernstein says that it's frivolous. FWIW, I disagree :) Regards, james -- James Raftery

RE: urgent help required

Hi Prashant As said in my last e-mail, I haven't used LDAP before so I can't really help you out there. The system we use is large and complex, and the documentation just to help us understand it already totals 13 pretty intensive pages, not including the prerequisite readings which is the NIS

(Time?)Problem with qmail/pop3d

Hello All, i think i have a time Problem. I send a mail to a user on the Mailservers. When i connect to the Mailservers Pop3 it don't shows me my Mails. (stat 0 0) After 2 or 3 hours i can download my mails via Pop3, when i telnet at this time to the pop3 server and do a stat and a list after

assign problem supplemental

Hi, seems as If my description did not get the point of my problem. Give me a second try: My /var/qmail/users/assign is this +allesrabe-de:popuser:500:100:/var/qmail/popboxes/allesrabe-de/helmut::: =haribeau:popuser:500:100:/var/qmail/popboxes/linuxlupe-de/haribeau:::

urgent help required

hello friends i am using qmail-ldap patch i want to store incoming mails for [EMAIL PROTECTED] on more then one mail host using mailhost attribute of qmail-ldap exapmple : atteributes like in following case host1 7 host is also running qmail MailMessageStore Mailhost but its

Square brackets in Received: header

Is there an easy way to get qmail to use square brackets for the IP address in Received: headers? E.g. Received: from xxx [209.61.156.95] by x instead of Received: from xxx (209.61.156.95) by x -- Klaus Johannes Rusch [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Help...

hi... I've just upgraded FreeBSD,from 2.2.8 to 4.0 In 2.2.8, everything was just fine. But after the upgrading, I the problem with qmail. qmail-send take too much cpu time, and I lot of messages which don't stop. the message is : qmail : number ** warning : unable to stat mess/2/54029 the

Re: SMTP port 25

- Original Message - From: "Brett Randall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] simply change an IP address on our port forwarding machine and its done - no external DNS and TTL hell to live through... You COULD alternately try ipmasqadm with ipchains but I haven't had any luck with port forwarding

backup server for spooling

I'm wondering howto setup a MX 20 server that will be a backup and spool email when the mx 10 server is down and when the mx 10 server goes backup then to transfer the spool of sorts to the mx 10 server Thanks for your time, Eric

Re: Help...

On 21-Aug-2000, Muhammad Yusuf wrote: I've just upgraded FreeBSD,from 2.2.8 to 4.0 qmail : number ** warning : unable to stat mess/2/54029 Your queue is probably corrupt. qmail uses the inode information from the filesystem to build the queue dir structure, so you can't simply move the

Re: backup server for spooling

On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 06:37:24AM -0700, Eric Peters wrote: I'm wondering howto setup a MX 20 server that will be a backup and spool email when the mx 10 server is down and when the mx 10 server goes backup then to transfer the spool of sorts to the mx 10 server Hi Eric,

from: ???

Hello, I've been using qmail for a few months now (with multiple domains) we have an exchange server (I didn't choose it, i promis) which routes all outgoing mail via qmail. In the log I've seen a few messages refused from the destination host(on the internet) because the from line is

Re: Help...

On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Muhammad Yusuf wrote: hi... I've just upgraded FreeBSD,from 2.2.8 to 4.0 In 2.2.8, everything was just fine. But after the upgrading, I the problem with qmail. qmail-send take too much cpu time, and I lot of messages which don't stop. the message is : qmail :

Re: from: ???

On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 03:34:13PM +0200, mailing wrote: In the log I've seen a few messages refused from the destination host(on the internet) because the from line is invalid. in fact the from line contains FROM: . Does anyone know what this, what it means and why..? An empty envelope

SPAMCONTROL

I recently installed SPAMCONTROL (1.3.0) and got to wonder how to handle control/relayclients, relaydomains and relaymailfrom. can i use these files without setting RELAYCLIENT with tcpserver and hows the syntayx within these files ??

Re: relay-ctrl

On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 08:35:23PM +0200, Clemens Hermann wrote: after having successfully set up qmail I really start loving it ;-). The only way to get it secure for my purpose seemed to be a smtp after Pop implementation. So I downloaded the relay-ctrl-2.0.tar.gz package and installed it

Re: SMTP port 25

"Brett Randall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running on anything other than port 25 is pretty silly considering that all applications and all mail relays attempt to deliver to port 25 on every mail server in the world...Internally, you could do it, but why? There are several reasons why this is

Mgetty+Fax does not mail

Hi! After I changed Sendmail-Qmail I get no email notification about sended/received faxes from mgetty+sendfax. It worked well with sendmail and I did not change any configuration. The sending/receiving of faxes works, I only miss the email notify... What could be the reason ? Thanks for your

Re: Square brackets in Received: header

On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 12:46:02PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there an easy way to get qmail to use square brackets for the IP address in Received: headers? Depends on what you call easy. Just edit received.c line 58 + 64, recompile, install. But note, that you will probably become

sender domain must resolve

Hi, some times I am receiving the message below when I try to deliver emails in (only) this server. Can I make something to decide this or I only depend on them? I am using qmail+djbdns. @400039a137f52616add4 delivery 65277: deferral:

Re: Mgetty+Fax does not mail

On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 04:36:37PM +0200, Peter Zak wrote: After I changed Sendmail-Qmail I get no email notification about sended/received faxes from mgetty+sendfax. It worked well with sendmail and I did not change any configuration. The sending/receiving of faxes works, I only miss the

Re: Mgetty+Fax does not mail

On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Peter Zak wrote: Hi! After I changed Sendmail-Qmail I get no email notification about sended/received faxes from mgetty+sendfax. It worked well with sendmail and I did not change any configuration. The sending/receiving of faxes works, I only miss the email notify...

RE: assign problem supplemental

Clemens, I think it must be .qmail files you're lacking - and that may be a better solution for you to use. Anyway, with your existing plan, with a users/assign as follows, +allesrabe-de-:usera:555:100:/home/usera:-:: =allesrabe-de-info:userb:666:100:/home/userb::: [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to

RE: CHANGING INETD

Anyway, while on this thread it has occurred to me to ask why put qmail in either inetd or tcpserver? Why not run it as a daemon? 1) If it ran as its own daemon, it would require root privileges to bind to port 25. When it is spawned by tcpserver, the amount of code requiring

Re: sender domain must resolve

Claudinei Luis Bianchini wrote: Hi, some times I am receiving the message below when I try to deliver emails in (only) this server. Can I make something to decide this or I only depend on them? I am using qmail+djbdns. @400039a137f52616add4 delivery 65277: deferral:

[Announce] Software for scalable hashed directory qmail

Dear List-members, For those of you who are interested - particularly those who run large qmail installations, possibly multiple-domain, I've been working on a system to hash users' directories automatically. It does not attempt to offer authentication (this would be a separate design decision:

Re: Square brackets in Received: header

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Markus Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 12:46:02PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there an easy way to get qmail to use square brackets for the IP address in Received: headers? Depends on what you call easy. Easy as in "does not require

Re: cannot connect to smtp or pop service

Hello again, An addendum to this message. It (finally) occurred to me to try telnetting to the ports. I got: benfell@linux:~ telnet 216.254.42.98:25 telnet: 216.254.42.98:25: Name or service not known: Success 216.254.42.98:25: Unknown host benfell@linux:~ telnet 216.254.42.98:110 telnet:

Re: Howto LDAP

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is important for me I need information of LDAP on QMAIL I need install LDAP or MYSQL runnig on QMAIL I am looking: www.nrg4u.com but I don't understand How works it? How do install a file .patch? I don't think you'll get many responses to

Uninstall

Please ... need uninstall qmail because need install againly .. need begin anew I need patch the source code.. Thanks

Re: Howto LDAP

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need information of LDAP on QMAIL I need install LDAP or MYSQL runnig on QMAIL I am looking: www.nrg4u.com but I don't understand How works it? 1) What documentation there is on this package is available from www.nrg4u.com. 2) The proper place to discuss this

Re: Uninstall

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please ... need uninstall qmail because need install againly .. need begin anew No need to uninstall. Just install over the current installation. -Dave

Re: Uninstall

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please ... need uninstall qmail because need install againly .. need begin anew I need patch the source code.. If you previously installed qmail from sources, `rm -rf /var/qmail` will do most, but not all, of it. If you installed from some other

Re: Uninstall

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please ... need uninstall qmail because need install againly .. need begin anew I need patch the source code.. Thanks You shouldn't have to remove it completely to patch the source code. Just a get a copy of the source code and apply the patch to it. Once

Re: assign problem supplemental

Hi Andrew, checking again and again the issues mentioned in your great and detailled help instructions now the problem is solved. I even do not know what finally caused the problem ;-). Everything seems to work now as I wanted it to. Thanks again for your effort Clemens

Re: patching qmail with multiple patches

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i am trying to apply following patches on qmail-1.03 , but not able to apply all those 1 qmail-bounce.patch 2 qmail-ldap-2601.patch 3 patching dns.c with appropriate patch 4 qmail-big-concurrency.patch 5 qmail-big-todo. patch I would: 1)

tcpserver return codes

I'm having an issue which I believe is tcpserver; I've searched the archives and haven't found anything. I have qmail up and running under tcpserver, and using a client like Outlook I am able to both send mail and recieve mail (using pop3 protocol). However, I have a network monitoring tool

Re: mbox o maildir

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best way of have user local buzon? ./Mailbox or /var/spool/mail/ I don't know what "buzon" means, and I can't tell whether you're asking whether delivery to mailboxes in the user's home directory is better than mailboxes in a spool directory, or whether

Re: cannot connect to smtp or pop service

On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 03:35:12PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote: David Benfell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An addendum to this message. It (finally) occurred to me to try telnetting to the ports. I got: benfell@linux:~ telnet 216.254.42.98:25 telnet: 216.254.42.98:25: Name or service not

Re: etmlm-web v2.0

If you can, try migrating the virtual domain to work with vchkpw. You can then use qmailadmin (inter7.com for both) to administer the accounts and the mailing lists. If you decide to do this, please read the FAQ file in the source directory for vchkpw. MHP - Original Message -

Re: Logs - rotate, archive... ?

On the box that we have here, every six hours a cron script goes into the send log directory and grabs all the non-current logs. It then concatenates them into on and sends them through a couple of components of qmailanalog. We have a couple specific accounts that need to be kept track of so the

Re: qmail and IP addresses.....

On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Russell Nelson wrote: It could be done for outgoing, but nobody has written such a patch. Chuck Foster DID write such a patch 2.5 years ago. (If you want a version that works with 1.03 and you cannot find any, ask me.) For what it's worth, Dan Bernstein says that it's

Re: i can't get started?

I had this same problem a couple weeks ago and ended up redoing the box, running through qmail exactly. A few things to make sure you did: 1. The text editor you were using to create the scripts may be creating dos-compatible text files. I hate to recommend this to a self-proclaimed newbie, but

RE: tcpserver return codes

Hey John, is your mail client and What's Up Gold on the same machine? If not, your tcpserver might not be open to relaying from the What's Up Gold machine. If they are both on the same machine and the email client works, then I'm going to guess that What's Up Gold tries to send email

Re: patching qmail with multiple patches

Also double-check with the appropriate patch author (especially if its a larger patch, like LDAP) to see which configurations he/she has tested it with. - Original Message - From: "Dave Sill" [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would: 1) Select only patches that I have a proven or mandated need for.

SPAM From (was Re: Re: from: ???)

James Raftery wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 03:34:13PM +0200, mailing wrote: In the log I've seen a few messages refused from the destination host(on the internet) because the from line is invalid. in fact the from line contains FROM: . Does anyone know what this, what it means and

Re: SPAM From (was Re: Re: from: ???)

Quoting Brian Baquiran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Hmm. Not too long a go, we were getting a lot of spam with "From: " and "Are you ready to GRADUATE" in the subject. We ended up denying all incoming SMTP from 4.48.43.* . Yes, well, in my experience the cons of blocking null senders far outweigh

Why not permanent failure code for bare LF?

I understand why qmail rejects messages containing a bare LF. My question is, why does it give SMTP result code 451 (indicating temporary failure) instead of a code to indicate permanent failure? Sending that same message will fail every time, will it not? I am just curious about the rationale.

Re: IDS signatures and Qmail DoS attacks

Subba Rao writes: I did not know that Qmail had some DoS attacks listed under it's security belt. I saw some IDS signatures that indicated that DoS attacks were being made against the Qmail server using long strings of Qmail commands. Currently, Qmail does a good job at buffer overflow

Re: Why not permanent failure code for bare LF?

On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 11:36:45PM -0400, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote: I understand why qmail rejects messages containing a bare LF. My question is, why does it give SMTP result code 451 (indicating temporary failure) instead of a code to indicate permanent failure? Sending that same message