suryadi writes:
> Can Qmail Works without inetd (in FreeBSD 3.5) and without others (such
> as tcpserver, etc) ?
CMIIW. No, qmail (spesifically qmail-smtpd) needs a 'server' (tcpserver,
(x)inetd, etc) to listen to SMTP connection.
Regards,
Ahmad Ridha
Can Qmail Works without inetd (in FreeBSD 3.5) and without others (such as
tcpserver, etc) ?
thx you
--sur--
You are correct. If you don't use it then it costs you nothing.
--
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Paul Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > qmail-queue will slow do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a vanilla (life with qmail-style) qmail server up and running
> on an internal development x86 linux server. Since this is supposed to
> be a test server for some mail applications that are being developed,
> what I w
Hello,
I have a vanilla (life with qmail-style) qmail server up and running on an internal
development x86 linux server. Since this is supposed to be a test server for some mail
applications that are being developed, what I would like to do is to configure qmail
to accept all mail it receives
Hello,
I have a vanilla (life with qmail-style) qmail server up and running on an internal
development x86 linux server. Since this is supposed to be a test server for some mail
applications that are being developed, what I would like to do is to configure qmail
to accept all mail it receives
Paul Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> qmail-queue will slow down mail processing (did in my case) so if its a
> medium/high volume smtp server then you better plan for some additional
> bogomips to fire off the scanning.
Note that the QMAILQUEUE patch alone should not in
No, I did. the qmail-queue patch only mods 2 files and the config for it
is also by itself.
qmail-queue will slow down mail processing (did in my case) so if its a
medium/high volume smtp server then you better plan for some additional
bogomips to fire off the scanning.
--
Paul Farber
Farber
board master <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've already installed:
>
> Qmail 1.03+Vpopmail 4.10+sqwebmail+daemontools+ezmlm+autoresond+ucspi
> (PHWEW!)
>
> and I was wondering what would happen if I patched a brand new qmail 1.03
> with the qmailqueue
Hi,
I've already installed:
Qmail 1.03+Vpopmail 4.10+sqwebmail+daemontools+ezmlm+autoresond+ucspi
(PHWEW!)
and I was wondering what would happen if I patched a brand new qmail 1.03
with the qmailqueue patch (I want to use virus scanning) and installed the
patched qmail over itself. Wo
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:01:22PM +0200, Eric Persson wrote:
> [root@mailzx daemontools-0.70]# /etc/init.d/qmail start
> Starting qmail
> svok: fatal: unable to chdir to /service/qmail-send: file does not exist
> qmail-send service not running
> svok: fatal: unable to chdir to
At 8:01 PM +0200 8/14/01, Eric Persson wrote:
>I cant find any info on what those /service/qmail-send and
>/service/qmail-smtpd should be, I tried to symlink them to the files in
>/var/qmail/bin that has the same names, but it seems like
>/service/qmail-send and /service/qmail-smt
Hi !
I've been fiddeling around to try installing qmail on my machine but
have got stuck with the smtppart. The delivering works fine, but I cant
use the machine as a smtp.
I read the http://lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#install-ucspi where it says
I need to install daemontools and ucspi-tc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> QMAIL-SMPTD doesnt work with INETD. I installed it as the INSTALL
> filedasaid to, but to no avail. I rebooted the box and Qmail-SMTPD didnt
> start.dadaAny help would be appreciated.dadaThis is the most current
> verision
QMAIL-SMPTD doesnt work with INETD. I installed it as the INSTALL
filedasaid to, but to no avail. I rebooted the box and Qmail-SMTPD didnt
start.dadaAny help would be appreciated.dadaThis is the most current
verision and is installed into the defaultdadirectories.dadaThanks!daAndy
Hi,
My qmail have theses permissions and work fine
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root other204 Apr 20 15:35 rc
drwxr-xr-x 2 root qmail512 May 21 11:01 users
drwxr-xr-x 2 root qmail512 May 21 11:01 boot
drwxr-xr-x 2 root qmail 1024 May 21 11:01 doc
drwxr-xr-x
On 14 Aug 2001, at 16:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> HELLO!
>
> I have installed qmail and have launched the 'instcheck'
> program.
> 'instcheck' printed the following messages:
>
> [root@timsat-srv2 qmail]# ./bin/instcheck
>
> instche
Hello ,
Spamkiller engine for QMAIL with SHA authentication and more
I would like to announce my QSP - a new approach in blocking SPAM with
SHA authentication, special support for mailinglists, individual
templates and so on Its
a
I have root as owner...
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> HELLO!
>
> I have installed qmail and have launched the 'instcheck'
> program.
> 'instcheck' printed the following messages:
>
> [root@timsat-srv2 qmail]# ./bin/instcheck
>
> i
HELLO!
I have installed qmail and have launched the 'instcheck'
program.
'instcheck' printed the following messages:
[root@timsat-srv2 qmail]# ./bin/instcheck
instcheck: warning: /var/qmail/control has wrong owner
instcheck: warning: /var/qmail/users has wrong owner
inst
Ok, just in case anybody else will fight with it too, I found this:
seekablepipe http://www.skarnet.org/software/qmail-local-mda/
--
jozef :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Jean-Christian,
Tuesday, August 14, 2001, 5:13:34 AM, you wrote:
> My original plan was to install qmail - VMailMgr - Courrier-IMAP.
> But after a little reading I find out that Courrier-IMAP has it own
> email server implementation. So it s
m wrong but my experience with
Nessus checking our qmail servers has been pretty similar because
qmail
won't complain about broken To headers but simply ignore them so
there
isn't anything that this exploit could do to your server.
Best regards,
Gabriel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR
ely. This is
no risk in qmail. A false positive once more.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
Hi all,
I have qmail 1.03, with tcpserver, vpopmail and qmailscanner and when I test my
network for vulnerabilities using
AXENT Netrecom 3.0 the following security results is displayed about my qmail server
host:
SMTP allows remote command execution via recipient filter.
Risk: 86
Description
Hi!,
I had subscribed to receive qmail mailing lists messages by sending an
empty message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from my subscribed address i.e
[EMAIL PROTECTED], now i want to unsubscribe from it as i have subscribed
with my other address.
I tried sending an empty message from the same address to
#include
On Tue, Aug 14 2001, Jean-Christian Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My original plan was to install qmail - VMailMgr - Courrier-IMAP. But after
> a little reading I find out that Courrier-IMAP has it own email server
> implementation. So it seems that qmai
Hi!,
I had subscribed to receive qmail mailing lists messages by sending an
empty message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from my subscribed address i.e
[EMAIL PROTECTED], now i want to unsubscribe from it as i have subscribed
with my other address.
I tried sending an empty message from the same address
My original plan was to install qmail - VMailMgr - Courrier-IMAP. But after
a little reading I find out that Courrier-IMAP has it own email server
implementation. So it seems that qmail is not needed?
Am I right? If so what are the advantages/disadvantages to either using
qmail with the
On 14 Aug 2001 02:47:18 +0200,
Craig Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there any way to make qmail-scanner leave an email it has been scanned
> allready?
You do not want to do this, because between two runs of the qmail-scanner
is one .qmail file, where it is very simple to
Hi All, Im using qmail-scanner etc..
I have one problem however, im using fastforward to do aliasing, and qmail-
scanner scan's and print's headers on the email's twice ..
is there any way to make qmail-scanner leave an email it has been scanned
allready?
Regards,
Craig
> > Return-Path : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>This _may_ be the reason.
That was it!
It was the headers.
They need to have an X-Sender, X-Mailer, RFC 822 formatted date, and
Return-Path, or Hotmail puts it in the Junk Mail folder automatically.
Thanks Henning & everyone
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 02:20:54PM -0700, CD Baby wrote:
> Return-Path : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This _may_ be the reason. I'm not sure, though. Try using qmail-inject's -f
options to set the envelope sender.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTE
So . . . maybe Hotmail is doing some kinda reverse lookup? (though my
Qmail-SMTP box has its own reversed domain & IP... fully legit.)
I thought maybe it was something else in the headers - because when I use
that Qmail SMTP server with Eudora things go through fine.
Again - I'll put
Leonardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need to change the time of deferred messages in qmail. My server is =
> very busy and I need retry to send every 15 minutes the messages.
> How and where I can change in the source code to make this?
Don't. qmail doesn'
Hello Guys,
I need to change the time of deferred messages in qmail. My server is =
very busy and I need retry to send every 15 minutes the messages.
How and where I can change in the source code to make this?
Thankz a lot.
; lookups) and set or unset the $TCPREMOTEHOST variable based on DNS
> information. when qmail-smtpd does not seem to care, or make any use of it.
>
> Is a shell script to be called in place of qmail-smtpd to check
> environment variables, then pass control back onto qmail-smtpd?
yes, you for sure are right this questions are answered in a FAQ or lWQ
i guess ;)
qmail serves all unix users on your local system as .. umm local users
even :)
They have to have a home dir and a Maildir (depending on your setup
using LWQ) as regular unix have, thats how it works.
But, not
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 10:24:36AM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> However lwq is a little short on how to actually add POP3 user accounts. Can
> anyone point me to some documentation on how to add POP3 users? (If this is
> a FAQ or in lwq sorry for asking but I did look and couldn't fin
I've gone throuhg lwq and have just finished installing qmail-pop3d and
checkpassword for qmail. They seem to be working.
However lwq is a little short on how to actually add POP3 user accounts. Can
anyone point me to some documentation on how to add POP3 users? (If this is
a FAQ or i
qmail Digest 13 Aug 2001 10:00:00 - Issue 1455
Topics (messages 67735 through 67761):
Re: qmail-lspawn patch for hosting multiple local domains
67735 by: Andre Oppermann
67738 by: Henning Brauer
Re: Perl and Qmail
67736 by: Henning Brauer
Re: pop3d question
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:28:10AM +0800, KY Lui wrote:
> hello
>
> i found "temporary qmail-inject error" in qmail log file
> what's the meaning?
>
It means that you have messed with the qmail-queue or qmail-inject files.
Please post more information, versi
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:28:53 +0800, KY Lui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello recently, i found that someone using my qmail server to send
> mail. how can i avoid this?
1. Include logs in your mail
2. Tell us how they used your qmail server to s
Title: qmail, avoid spam mail
Hello
recently, i found that someone using my qmail server to send mail.
how can i avoid this?
thanks
regards
KY
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:42:25AM -0400, qmail wrote:
> After I test the qmail-smtpd and qmail-send is ok,it seems to me ok.
> I try to install qmail-pop3d and start this service.
> I add the run script in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d
> I use the method to test the checkpasswd
After I test the qmail-smtpd and qmail-send is ok,it seems to me ok.
I try to install qmail-pop3d and start this service.
I add the run script in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d
I use the method to test the checkpasswd program, the response is ok.
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m
Title: temporary qmail-inject error
hello
i found "temporary qmail-inject error" in qmail log file
what's the meaning?
thanks
regards
KY
Quick question regarding tcpserver, environment variables, and
qmail-smtpd.
I'd like to be able to stop inbound smtp connections for systems that
don't have at least a DNS A record. I mean, c'mon... If you are running
a mail server, it should have a valid DNS entry, no?
I am working through a few last minor issues, but Kaspersky Antivirus
for Linux servers has a nice qmail integration piece.
http://www.kaspersky.com (You'll want at least the August 1st 3.5
build 136 version - mime problems with earlier versions)
Basically, you start the antivirus d
You can also try this script;
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/03/msg01041.html
don't forget to use the -i flag on all grep commands so that you won't
miss the upper case characters.
cheers
Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga wrote:
>
> Averroes <[EMAI
Averroes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am new in qmail and want to migrate qmail with security purposes
> but I want to know how to deal with virus, worms, etc.
> It is possible to configure qmail with some tools
> which check the contents of mail, attached docs, etc.
> Al
Hi There,
I am new in qmail and want to migrate qmail with security purposes
but I want to know how to deal with virus, worms, etc.
It is possible to configure qmail with some tools
which check the contents of mail, attached docs, etc.
All my server are Linux powered and all clients are Win2k
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 08:26:43PM +, MarkD wrote:
> > argument, the name of the local user to verify. This patch makes
> > qmail-lspawn call qmail-getpw with two arguments; the name and the domain
> > of the local user to verify. This, together with a modified qmail-getp
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 08:44:56AM -0700, Greg White wrote:
> I'm not aware of any _reason_ you'd want to recieve mail in a Perl
> program -- that's what your MTA is there for.
Ever thought about Mailrobots? I've written tons of them - how do you think
all the domains get registered?
--
* Henn
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 03:10:29PM +, eric wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > I'm not aware of any _reason_ you'd want to recieve mail in a Perl
> > program -- that's what your MTA is there for.
> >
>
> Using perl to create your own MUA, using perl to cre
- Original Message -
[snip]
>
> I'm not aware of any _reason_ you'd want to recieve mail in a Perl
> program -- that's what your MTA is there for.
>
Using perl to create your own MUA, using perl to create an
autoresponder, blah, blah, blah..., using perl to grab the stuff
from you
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 01:45:35PM -, Frederik Van Herterijck wrote:
> I'm having some problems sending e-mail from within a perl program
> using qmail.
>
> Can someone tell me how I can easily send and receive mails in perl
> using qmail. I'm trying and trying bu
Hi Frederik,
> I'm having some problems sending e-mail from within a perl program
> using qmail.
try opening a 'pipe' to qmail-inject and send your mail in
--
open(INJECTPIPE, "| qmail-inject");
print all you info to the pipe
Bcc:
Cc:
From:
Reply-To:
Subjec
I'm having some problems sending e-mail from within a perl program
using qmail.
Can someone tell me how I can easily send and receive mails in perl
using qmail. I'm trying and trying but nothing works.
Qmail works perfectly.
It should be nice to have some perl-code which does thi
Hey folks.
So, more questions. Always, eh.
I've got a script that uses the qmail-queue patch that scans and
logs/drops/saves/rejects mail based on content..
What I'm wondering is if there is a way I can change the "message" that
is sent when various exit codes are recieve
theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail&m=98678523400345&w=2 for a painless
solution to your problem.
Chris
PGP signature
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok.. so qmail-remote crashed.. but why?
Who knows? Did you kill it?
> It had also been running for over 3 hours?
So? Long messages to a slow host can do this.
> Well to test it out I did the following:
[...]
You didn't
0c starting
> delivery 26: msg 112603 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2001-08-09 13:41:28.533103500.s:@40003b72c33a3620be2c delivery 26:
> deferral: qmail-remote_crashed./
> [root@mail send]#
>
> Ok.. so qmail-remote crashed.. but why?
Unless something very unusual is happen
Ok.. after searching through the logs for a bit, I have discovered the
following about some of the messages getting stuck in the queue..
This is the method I used to do this test, if it's wrong tell me, but
this is what I did. First off I ran:
[root@mail qmail]# ps ax | grep qmail-remote
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not to start anything else, but is there any better way to stop qmail
> when using tcp-daemonts than svc -d /service/qmail-send ?
No -- that is the proper way to stop qmail with daemontools.
> This doesn't seem to always
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:39:28PM -0500, Edward McLain allegedly wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: qmail-queue question
>
> >> 3.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:31:34PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet from my
> mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is listening. But I get a
> "connection refused" message.
>
> I&
-Original Message-
From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail-queue question
>> 3. When the queue shows the message arriving on 30 Jul 2001 15:08:23
I
>> tend to think that it actually arrive at
> 3. When the queue shows the message arriving on 30 Jul 2001 15:08:23 I
> tend to think that it actually arrive at 3:08 on Jul 30 of 2001, that is
> unless qmail is doing something funking with date and time stamps. ;)
But you didn't show the log entry that corresponds to this
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK... Let me explain this a little bit better and maybe clear some
> things up.
Okay.
> 2. The only patch on this system is the qmailqueue-patch for the
> qmailscanner.
This can cause qmail-queue to not be run, but not qmail-remo
but Coda doesn't use kerberos.
> So during mail delivery, qmail-lspawn will setuid to become the
> email receipient, except that in most cases, this user will not
> have a valid
> token.
I don't know well AFS, but with Coda / Vpopmail is trivial. It's
sufficient to get a to
ll
-9 to do it.
2. The only patch on this system is the qmailqueue-patch for the
qmailscanner.
3. When the queue shows the message arriving on 30 Jul 2001 15:08:23 I
tend to think that it actually arrive at 3:08 on Jul 30 of 2001, that is
unless qmail is doing something funking with date and
"Jean-Christian Imbeault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[Mike Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote]
>
>>Another great resource is 'Life With Qmail' at www.lifewithqmail.org.
>
>Got that already. But as I found out it's Linux-centric. I'll
Paul Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am looking for a solution to remove most of the headers in a
> message, so that the recepient cannot see any info of my internal
> network.
Why? Your internal network is firewalled off, right? Futzing with
headers is, in general, a very bad idea.
Wha
Edward,
I've had problems with qmail-remote hanging - it had nothing to do
with the queue lifetime, but with some code in qmail-remote failing,
possibly due to an O/S bug.
A fix which works for me is to enable socket keep-alives. This will
kill the socket if it has died
qmail-queue patch + qmail-qfilter or qmail-masq to do the
job.
After Removing headers it should look something like this: -
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sophia.pacific.net.sg ([203.120.90.146])
01-08-09 16:55:10.612899500 starting delivery 7: msg 365071 to remote
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.613655500 status: local 0/100 remote 1/100
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.618145500 delivery 7: deferral: qmail-remote_crashed./
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.618697500 status: local 0/100
Martin Hasenbein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> what could be the reason for such an error message???:
[...]
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.618145500 delivery 7: deferral: qmail-remote_crashed./
[...]
> I've patched qmail with a few patches, [...]
There's your answer -- you
Steve writes:
> 1. Is it possible to list the Qmail server as the primary MX record and
> still forward the mail to its final destination? All my research
> says no, but I need to be certain.
Use smtproutes. It essentially functions as an MX record with
priority -1 (in other
16:55:10.613655500 status: local 0/100 remote 1/100
2001-08-09 16:55:10.618145500 delivery 7: deferral: qmail-remote_crashed./
2001-08-09 16:55:10.618697500 status: local 0/100 remote 0/100
I've patched qmail with a few patches, to have SMTP_AUTH, QMTP, Spamcontrol ...
and it compiled
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> But I have messages that are getting stuck in the queue sometimes for
> more than 3 weeks. I have /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime set to
> 345600 (4 days). Anyone have any idea why this is happening?
You broke something. You
Jean-Christian Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet from my
> mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is listening. But I get a
> "connection refused" message.
[...]
> I think qmail is r
Got a solution for this; thanks for all your help. The problem was qmail was
unable to deliver mail if the Maildir is stored on AFS.
Andrea mentioned that AFS is very similar to CODA, and the CODA solution is
to use rename() as I was planning on doing. Peter had cautioned that rename
will
>>>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 13:10:34 +, "Jean-Christian Imbeault"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> case, tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current and start qmail.
> @40003b728c052b1e1bdc tcpserver: fatal: no IP address for O
Ah, then this is a conf
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 01:10:34PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> >case, tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current and start qmail.
>
> @40003b728c052b1e1bdc tcpserver: fatal: no IP address for O
You got an O ('oh') that should be a 0 ('zero').
Unless yo
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 01:10:34PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> >case, tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current and start qmail.
>
> @40003b728c052b1e1bdc tcpserver: fatal: no IP address for O
Fix your run file: you've got the letter O in there where you should
enough anti Microsoft shit and lets get on with life.
Ross
[moved to mutt from Outlook for this listperfer Outlook]
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Adam Nealis wrote:
> --- Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Exchange box is firewalled and boarded up and placed be
> I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet from
> my
> mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is listening. But I
> get a
> "connection refused" message.
Too vague...you typed what exactly ? Hopefully :-
telnet localho
>case, tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current and start qmail.
@40003b728c052b1e1bdc tcpserver: fatal: no IP address for O
>I can tell you now that, from
>your ps output, qmail is not running. If it was, there would be a
>tcpserver running as well, listening to port 25 and spa
>>>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 12:31:34 +, "Jean-Christian Imbeault"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet
> from my mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is
> listening. But I get
I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet from my
mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is listening. But I get a
"connection refused" message.
I've enable telnet in inetd.conf and my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks like this:
127.:allow,RELA
--- Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Exchange box is firewalled and boarded up and placed behind wallboard
Except you can't do that with an NT box because
you'll need access to reboot it every so many days
and you can't do that remotely out of the box ;).
_
that they start
to fill the queue up pretty fast. Now
this isn’t that big of a problem anymore since I raised our connection
limit way the hell up there. But I have
messages that are getting stuck in the queue sometimes for more than 3
weeks. I have /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime
set to 345600
> > 1. Is it possible to list the Qmail server as the primary MX record and
> >
> > still forward the mail to its final destination? All my research says
> > no,
> > but I need to be certain.
>
> Yes, use smtproutes. See the manual page for qmail-remote.
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 09:01:33PM +0200, Jörgen Persson wrote:
>
> The archives will tell you more about pop3d than the tcpserver log. The
> following article[1], by Bernstein himself, might interest you.
>
> Jörgen
> [1]http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmai
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 09:00:46PM -0400, Steve wrote:
> 1. Is it possible to list the Qmail server as the primary MX record and
>
> still forward the mail to its final destination? All my research says
> no,
> but I need to be certain.
Yes, use smtproutes. See the manual
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 12:04:50PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> We have exactly the same issue here. Exchange goes down. Mail backs up on
> Qmail servers. Exchange comes back up. USERS ARE TOLD ITS WORKING AGAIN.
> Users then wonder why it takes up to 2 hours for queued mail to get to them
/mailing-lists/qmail/1998/08/msg008
96.html>
Here is my situation. Almost everything is working. I've set up qmail and
vpopmail using mysql. I can log a user into a virtual domain through
mailtoweb and read any emails that I may have. I can send emails to my
virtual domain users from any other account(hotmail for example), but w
Vanilla qmail 1.03 stores the envelope sender address (preceded by an F and
followed by a NUL) in a file in the directory /var/qmail/info/.
RFC 1869 ("SMTP Service Extensions") allows one to pass additional information
on the MAIL command line after the FROM: . Some of this information
1 - 100 of 13877 matches
Mail list logo
