RE: VPN Software

http://poptop.sourceforge.net/dox/ -Original Message- From: Rodolfo J. Paiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN Software At 8/21/2003 11:05 -0400, you wrote: >I have been using it for over two years and no major is

RE: VPN Software

At 8/21/2003 11:05 -0400, you wrote: I have been using it for over two years and no major issue yet. Setup was good that the windows clients all come with the VPN client so there's no extra cost. I wouldn't try using it to link to networks together just client access. If your looking for network li

Re: VPN Software

On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:31, Benjamin wrote: > Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, Windows XP includes IPsec support via the MMC/Security > plugins. > Unfortunately, it's a hideous mess to setup/maintain, IMHO. > Folks with > more experience runni

Re: VPN Software

How about Linux to cisco?   BennyJason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 13:10, Bret Hughes wrote:> On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 09:59, Jason Dixon wrote:> >> > As far as Windows clients go, I prefer SSH Sentinel. Very easy to> > setup, nice to administer and track network usage. Unf

Re: VPN Software

On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 13:10, Bret Hughes wrote: > On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 09:59, Jason Dixon wrote: > > > > As far as Windows clients go, I prefer SSH Sentinel. Very easy to > > setup, nice to administer and track network usage. Unfortunately, > > they've recently stopped selling it retail and now

Re: VPN Software

On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 09:59, Jason Dixon wrote: > On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 10:55, bruce wrote: > > Hi... > > > > A quick (or not) question about VPN software. Does anyone have any > > recommendations for good/solid/secure Open Source VPN software that you've > > actually installed/used or been expose

RE: VPN Software

ec which I haven't used yet. -Original Message- From: bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN Software Thanks... But have you actually used it/experience with it..? Are there any issues with i tthat you

RE: VPN Software

PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: VPN Software POPTOP pptp works great -Original Message- From: bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN Software Hi... A quick (or not) question about VPN software. Does anyone have any

Re: VPN Software

On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 10:55, bruce wrote: > Hi... > > A quick (or not) question about VPN software. Does anyone have any > recommendations for good/solid/secure Open Source VPN software that you've > actually installed/used or been exposed to!!! On Linux, I've used FreeSWAN. More commonly, I use

RE: VPN Software

POPTOP pptp works great -Original Message- From: bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN Software Hi... A quick (or not) question about VPN software. Does anyone have any recommendations for good/solid/secure Open Sour

RE: VPN

On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Chris Johnston wrote: > Ooops. But then again, I went off about the difference without directly > answering his question. > > Almost any NAT device will allow isakmp nat-traversal to take place. > However, does RedHat directly support said feature? Dunno - unless, of > cour

RE: VPN

Ooops. But then again, I went off about the difference without directly answering his question. Almost any NAT device will allow isakmp nat-traversal to take place. However, does RedHat directly support said feature? Dunno - unless, of course, you are using the Cisco VPN client for Linux. Now d

RE: VPN

Hello Edwin; Generally speaking IPSEC passthru means that if you initiate the IKE connection on UDP/500 outbound then the inbound connection will be sent back to your "internal" IP by the proxy/firewall, and thereafter the IP/50 (ESP) traffic then can return to your PC and a tunnel built. This is

Re: VPN solution

Thanks for the help mike! Steve Howard Software Trainer Information Technology Services Kennesaw State University 770-423-6895 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/05/03 04:04 AM >>> A google search on Linux vpn brings 755,000 hits including HOWTOs. Regards, Mike Wafkowski http://www.osheaven.net Linux CDs a

Re: VPN solution

Hi Sudh,   I'm currently implementing VPN stuff here. I don't recommend you to use CIPE because all the versions of CIPE shipped from Red Hat have a "small packets bug" which could bring you some trouble. I'm using the PPTP protocol. You can learn about it there: http://poptop.sourceforge.n

Re: VPN solution

On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 03:53:06AM -0400, Sudh Peram wrote: > Hi, > I'm looking for a VPN solution with Red Hat Linux. I'd appreciate fi you > gurus can point me to some links to implement VPNs with Red Hat Linux. You can find detailed instructions in the Offficial guides (reference and configura

Re: VPN solution

A google search on Linux vpn brings 755,000 hits including HOWTOs. Regards, Mike Wafkowski http://www.osheaven.net Linux CDs and Stuff - Original Message - From: "Sudh Peram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 3:53 AM Subject: VPN solution > Hi,

Re: VPN solutions?

i'm keeping several customers happy with ultravnc/putty. On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 09:37, Bill Dossett wrote: > Hi, > > www.freeswan.org if you need to interop with the widest > variety of other products. I currently have linux freeswan > to windows xp, 2000 and cisco routers. Both windows gateways

Re: VPN client confusion

I think that your office server is a pptp one install the pptp client for linux (see the PopTop site at http://www.poptop.org/) hth A 09:51 13/06/2003 -0400, vous avez écrit : >I need some direction on setting up a VPN client for my home Linux boxes. I >am running RH7.3 on one and RH9 on anothe

Re: VPN solutions?

Hi, www.freeswan.org if you need to interop with the widest variety of other products. I currently have linux freeswan to windows xp, 2000 and cisco routers. Both windows gateways and road warriors work... I'm not sure I'd say setting it up the first time is easy, depends on how much you've work

Re: VPN Client

Most VPN clients are free. In most cases, the client will only work with their server. i.e. Cisco VPN clients will work with their server. david On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Aly Dharshi wrote: > Hello Folks, > > I hope that you are well, where can I find a decent VPN client software > that would

Re: VPN info, again

Kerry Miller said: > another office on our network, securely (we don't trust their users yet), if you don't trust them you could always do a 1 way VPN :) that is, you have full access to their network but they have no access to yours ..I did that a few years ago, worked well nate -- redh

Re: VPN opinions

nate writes: > also, depending on your needs, a full VPN may be overkill. Many remote > server to server communications are usually about a specific service or > services. In the case of a TCP service, e.g. mysql traffic, or LDAP > traffic, I use stunnel to link machines. This is a simple point to

Re: VPN opinions

I'm using some Symantec Firewall/VPN appliances to maintain a VPN including the U.S., Denmark, and South America for a company I work for. They are flawless, though pricey. There are extensive configuration options. Paul -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subjec

Re: VPN opinions

kmiller01 said: > > I'm looking for opinions on VPN's. We're planning to set up a VPN between > a couple of our offices, they won't have to interoperate with any Windows > machines or any other clients, just the 2 machines talking to each other > to link 2 networks. > > Do any of you guys have

Re: VPN opinions

kmiller01 said: > > I'm looking for opinions on VPN's. We're planning to set up a VPN between > a couple of our offices, they won't have to interoperate with any Windows > machines or any other clients, just the 2 machines talking to each other > to link 2 networks. > > Do any of you guys have

Re: VPN opinions

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:12:01PM -0600, kmiller01 wrote: > > I'm looking for opinions on VPN's. We're planning to set up a VPN between a > couple of our offices, they won't have to interoperate with any Windows > machines or any other clients, just the 2 machines talking to each other to > l

Re: VPN opinions

kmiller01 writes: > I'm looking for opinions on VPN's. We're planning to set up a VPN between a > couple of our offices, they won't have to interoperate with any Windows > machines or any other clients, just the 2 machines talking to each other to > link 2 networks. > > Do any of you guys hav

RE: VPN opinions

Are the computers you want to connect on networks? I bought two Netgear VPN Firewalls to do that. Unfortunately the two routers/firewalls are 25 miles away and I have not succeeded in getting the remote access to the firewall working so I can setup the vpn feature without driving across town all

Re: VPN question!!!!

CD> Is anyone using VPN with RH8? What is available? What do you recommend? My configuration; RH 7.3 as firewall/gateway for internal net with workstations (win2k, rh8, mac) Win2k is VPN server (Microsoft VPN), so client must be also win machine (win2k or winXP) or you can use stand alone VPN cl

Re: VPN question!!!!

cipe. no kernel monkeying. comes with redhat distro. for windoze get http://cipe-win32.sourceforge.net/CIPE-Win32-2.0-pre15.zip the only gotcha i hit was the need to manually start the DKW (cipe) adapter via the win2k services control panel. write me directly if questions, i don't watch the lis

RE: VPN question!!!!

Title: Message I'm using RH8 with an updated kernel 2.4.19. The RH8 kernel had some issues with pptp and mppe. After getting the new kernel installed it fired up no problem. pppd 2.4.1.pppoe2 pptpd-1.1.3 kernel-2.4.19 linux-2.4.19-openssl-0.9.6b-mppe.patch   that's all you should need.

Re: VPN with RH8 and wireless

FreeSWAN is IPSEC based and works but is complex and requires a lot of technical knowledge to set up. CIPE is easier VTUND is butt-simple, but tunnels through TCP and if you have a connection that loses packets very frequently you will be pulling your hair out waiting for TCP retries. -Ben. On

RE: VPN masq

PPTP, because I think that MS servers/clients use that protocol. > > What type of VPN? IPSec? PPTP? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: VPN masq > > > I'm running

RE: VPN masq

$PPTP_SERVER -j ACCEPT But IPSEC will be something different. Cameron. > -Original Message- > From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2002 05:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: VPN masq > > > That's correct. Basic

Re: VPN masq

> I have tried to unsubscribe myself 10 times, both by replying to the > auto address as well as by emailing the human./ No reuslt, I still get > this stuff. If you're that desperate, you should have read the archives - this has been answered at least ten times!!! Use the second link below - scro

RE: VPN masq

ules are: > > -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE > -A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.0/24 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT > > -Steve > > -Original Message- > From: Simpson, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:53 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' &

RE: VPN masq

ssage- > From: Rigler, S C (Steve) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: VPN masq > > > No. > > The redhat box is dual homed, and is firewalling a > small (3 node) network. > The

RE: VPN masq

ieve the affecting rules are: -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE -A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.0/24 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT -Steve -Original Message- From: Simpson, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:53 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: VPN masq T

RE: VPN masq

The VPN client is part of your three node network, yes? It is VPNing to another network? Thanks, Doug -Original Message- From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN masq No. The redhat box is

RE: VPN masq

ECTED]' Subject: RE: VPN masq Steve, Do you have a roadwarrior setup? Doug -Original Message- From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN masq I've been doing this successfully since RH 7.1

RE: VPN masq

Steve, Do you have a roadwarrior setup? Doug -Original Message- From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN masq I've been doing this successfully since RH 7.1 using iptables and no pa

RE: VPN masq

What type of VPN? IPSec? PPTP? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN masq I'm running Red HAT 7.3 (2.4.18-18.7.x) as gateway between internal net and Internet. I use NAT masq

RE: VPN masq

I've been doing this successfully since RH 7.1 using iptables and no patches. AFAIK, there is no patch available to do this with ipchains on 2.4 kernel. If I remember correctly, the patch only applied to 2.2 kernels using ipchains. I'm not sure of the limitations of iptables and VPN traffic si

RE: VPN on redhat 7.0

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Simpson, Doug wrote: > I am using freeswan(IPSEC) so you will want to visit their web site, but > first check out this website and there are links there for freeswan and the > x509 patch - http://www.techwolf.com/RH72freeswan.html >

RE: VPN on redhat 7.0

t: RE: VPN on redhat 7.0 Sure Doug that would be great, all the information I can get will be helpful. Thanks From: "Simpson, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: RE: VPN on redhat 7.0Date:

RE: VPN on redhat 7.0

Sure Doug that would be great, all the information I can get will be helpful. Thanks From: "Simpson, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: RE: VPN on redhat 7.0Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:07:46 -0600Reply-To: [EMAIL

RE: VPN on redhat 7.0

, 2002 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPN on redhat 7.0 Bill Welch wrote: > > Has anyone been successful at allowing a VPN connection thought a > redhat 7.0 server? Can you provide some tips or point me in the right > direction. I want to allow win9x, XP workstation

Re: VPN on redhat 7.0

Bill Welch wrote: Has anyone been successful at allowing a VPN connection thought a redhat 7.0 server? Can you provide some tips or point me in the right direction. I want to allow win9x, XP workstations to connect through the redhat 7.0 server to remote VPN servers. Last night I configure

Re: vpn masq builtin to kernels yet?

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:02:10AM +, gregory mott wrote: : is vpn masq builtin to any kernels yet, or must one still follow the : instructions in the VPN-Masquerade-HOWTO-2? No longer applies.. netfilter (been in there since 2.3.something) handles masq'ing of pptp easily. Most IPSec clients

RE: VPN Masquerade on Red Hat 7.1 (now 7.3)

> -Original Message- > From: George Agnelli > > > Ok, so I have upgraded to 7.3 which has Kernel 2.4.18-3 and I have > configured iptables 1.2.5 to do masquerading for my internal > network by following the instructions in the masquerading how-to > (http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquer

Re: VPN Masquerade on Red Hat 7.1 (now 7.3)

Ok, so I have upgraded to 7.3 which has Kernel 2.4.18-3 and I have configured iptables 1.2.5 to do masquerading for my internal network by following the instructions in the masquerading how-to (http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/firewall-examples.html#RC.FIR EWALL-2.4.X). This all works

RE: VPN Masquerade on Red Hat 7.1

I am not sure about 7.1, but presumably you can/should upgrade to the latest 7.3 kernel anyway. I changed from 6.2 to 7.3 recently. I masq MS PPTP from a win98 machine to a win2k server. My recollection is that it stops working under ipchains, so I took the opportunity (was forced) to convert to i

RE: VPN with linux

If you're connecting to a Windows VPN server that is using Microsoft PPTP, then check out this client for your Linux box: http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net If your school is using IPSec, check out FreeSWAN: http://www.freswan.org -Original Message- From: Achmad Mardiansyah [mailto:[E

Re: VPN with linux

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Achmad Mardiansyah wrote: > in my campus, if i want to connect internet, i have to login to the VPN > server, via Windows VPN-dialup networking. Check out the PPTP Linux client at http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/ and see if that gets you "where no one wants to go today(tm)

RE: VPN with linux

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Achmad Mardiansyah Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN with linux guys... in my campus, if i want to connect internet, i have to login to t

Re: VPN with linux

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:04:06AM +0700, Achmad Mardiansyah wrote: > > in my campus, if i want to connect internet, i have to login to the VPN > server, via Windows VPN-dialup networking. > > is there any programs in linux like VPN Dialup Networking? check out freeswan, that might do it for yo

Re: VPN clienti

Hi, > > Here are some links you might find usefull (in many of these projects, > there > is no real client/server relationship, but are rather peer to peer) : > > cipe > http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html > > freeswan (ipsec) > http://www.freeswan.org/doc.html Hi, Finaly i decidend

Re: VPN clienti

On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 08:17, Javier Gostling wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:12:29AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > > Matthew hasn't updated that document in a long time, but he means to. > > In the meantime, the ssh-vpn scripts here: > > http://www.dragonsdawn.net/~gordon/vpn/ > > Beware

Re: VPN clienti

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:12:29AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 03:40, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 Sep 2002 11:14 am, Ionel Ploaie wrote: > > > i try o find a vpn client for linux (RedHat 7.3) > > > can somebody help? > > > > I missed one, http://tldp.org/HOWT

RE: VPN clienti

]] On Behalf Of Patrice DUMAS - DOCT Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 7:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPN clienti On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:14:32PM +0300, Ionel Ploaie wrote: > Hello > i try o find a vpn client for linux (RedHat 7.3) > can somebody help? Hi, Here are some link

Re: VPN clienti

On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 03:40, Gary Stainburn wrote: > On Tuesday 03 Sep 2002 11:14 am, Ionel Ploaie wrote: > > i try o find a vpn client for linux (RedHat 7.3) > > can somebody help? > > I missed one, http://tldp.org/HOWTO/VPN-HOWTO/index.html. This will probably > be a much better resource than

Re: VPN clienti

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:14:32PM +0300, Ionel Ploaie wrote: > Hello > i try o find a vpn client for linux (RedHat 7.3) > can somebody help? Hi, Here are some links you might find usefull (in many of these projects, there is no real client/server relationship, but are rather peer to peer) : ci

Re: VPN clienti

On Tuesday 03 Sep 2002 11:14 am, Ionel Ploaie wrote: > Hello > i try o find a vpn client for linux (RedHat 7.3) > can somebody help? I missed one, http://tldp.org/HOWTO/VPN-HOWTO/index.html. This will probably be a much better resource than the Mini HOWTO I mentioned before. -- Gary Stainburn

Re: VPN clienti

On Tuesday 03 Sep 2002 11:14 am, Ionel Ploaie wrote: > Hello > i try o find a vpn client for linux (RedHat 7.3) > can somebody help? Hi, A bit more help would be usefull. What kind of VPN are you after? IPSec http://www.freeswan.org pppd over ssh http://tldp.org/HO

Re: VPN connection

On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 at 11:10am (+0300), Ionel Ploaie wrote: > > > What do pptp and pppd say in the logfiles when you're trying to > > establish a link? > > > > M. > > > > -- > > :wq! > > Connection closed > Modem hang-up (but under windows is working) > Umm... I was hopeing for a more comp

Re: VPN connection

> What do pptp and pppd say in the logfiles when you're trying to > establish a link? > > M. > > -- > :wq! Connection closed Modem hang-up (but under windows is working) -- IONEL PLOAIE[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator - SC Salu

Re: VPN connection

On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 at 9:45am (+0300), Ionel Ploaie wrote: > > Hello all there, > > I have a trouble with my vpn client (pptp). Until few days ago this > connection was workink ... but now ... no :( > I use pptp like this: > > cd /usr/local/vpn > sleep 1 > ./pptp my.vpn > sleep 1 > ifconfig

Re: VPN Connect

Hello all there, I have a trouble with my vpn client (pptp). Until few days ago this connection was workink ... but now ... no :( I use pptp like this: cd /usr/local/vpn sleep 1 ./pptp my.vpn sleep 1 ifconfig ppp0 sleep 1 ifconfig ppp0 up sleep 1 route add -host vpn_ip_address gw gw_ip_add

Re: VPN Software for RedHat

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Gary Stainburn wrote: > On Wednesday 21 August 2002 9:29 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Hi, > > > > > I am looking for a reliable VPN server software for RedHat 7.3. > > I should be able to establish tunnels with Checkpoint, Intel Shiva and > > Cisco PIX bas

RE: VPN Software for RedHat

The only solution I know of is free/SWAN - there's a Redhat kernel RPM and tools to go with it, you can have a IPSEC server up in minutes. I have it running and it works great. How compatible it will be with other IPSEC software will depend on how close to the standard they are, but you should be

Re: VPN Software for RedHat

On Wednesday 21 August 2002 9:29 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi folks, Hi, > > I am looking for a reliable VPN server software for RedHat 7.3. > I should be able to establish tunnels with Checkpoint, Intel Shiva and > Cisco PIX based VPN boxes. Can someone point me in the right direction? If

Re: VPN Server with IPSec

On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 08:21, Stephen Torri wrote: > The only information that I heard about IPSec is that it cannot be NAT. > IPs on both ends must remain what they are during the connection. This > is not official or confirmed information. Just what I heard second hand. > So the two end points I

Re: VPN Server with IPSec

On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 00:22, Brian wrote: > I have a DSL connection that now connected to my Redhat 7.3 box, it > acting as a router/firewall. Up to now ,I just have a established > connection and allow nothing inbound only outbound, now I would like to > setup a VPN to my network, I have selected

Re: VPN Server with IPSec

On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 01:22, Brian wrote: > I have a DSL connection that now connected to my Redhat 7.3 box, it > acting as a router/firewall. Up to now ,I just have a established > connection and allow nothing inbound only outbound, now I would like to > setup a VPN to my network, I have selected

RE: VPN: FreeSWAN or Cipe

On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Brian wrote: > Do you have the ISBN # 1-57870-266-6 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Behalf Of Gerry Doris > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 7:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: VPN: Fre

Re: VPN: FreeSWAN or Cipe

Gerry Doris wrote: > > On 12 Apr 2002, Saul Arias wrote: > > > I have to set up a VPN between two networks at separate physical > > locations over DSL connections (static IP), using two RH 72 boxes as > > end-points. After some research, I have found that I can use either > > FreeSWAN or Cipe. >

RE: VPN: FreeSWAN or Cipe

Do you have the ISBN # -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gerry Doris Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 7:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPN: FreeSWAN or Cipe On 12 Apr 2002, Saul Arias wrote: > I have to set up a VPN between

Re: VPN: FreeSWAN or Cipe

On 12 Apr 2002, Saul Arias wrote: > I have to set up a VPN between two networks at separate physical > locations over DSL connections (static IP), using two RH 72 boxes as > end-points. After some research, I have found that I can use either > FreeSWAN or Cipe. > > I do not know which way to go.

Re: VPN: FreeSWAN or Cipe

There is another VPN package that is simple to setup and works well for me in my limited need situation. It was considerably simpler to configure than either FreeSWAN or Cipe appeared to be. It's called "vpnd" and is available from http://sunsite.dk/vpnd. I've used it for about two years with v

Re: VPN/Ipchains question

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:32:10PM -0600, Kerry Miller wrote: : We have a client using a CheckPoint VPN, we're trying to use the VPN-1 : SecureClient. Does anybody know what ports/protocols I need to open for : this to work through our firewall? I tried this: I'm going to make a few assumptions

Re: VPN fustration

No, I have to connect PPTP or IPSec. I'm connecting to a corporate network that has these two ways of access. For me to setup something different, like vtun, would be creating a backdoor into our corporate network. Can't do it. James On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 12:44, Jorge Gossain Filho wrote: > Em

Re: VPN fustration

Em Wednesday 27 February 2002 19:01, Você escreveu: > I've posted to this list three times asking about VPN, IPSec or PPTP, > for Redhat 7.2.I've been trying to get linux-pptp working without > success so far.I can't seem to find any help on it. > > I have not received one response on my other thr

RE: VPN fustration

Looks like there are some patches to the kernel for VPN http://www.impsec.org/linux/masquerade/ip_masq_vpn.html not for the 2.4.9 kernel though. -Original Message- From: Paul Hamm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:37 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' S

Re: VPN fustration

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:20:02PM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote: > > I personally found simple ssh tunnel between two subnets the easiest to > set up but I also have freeswan running between my house and the office. This seems to be the best thing to do, based on everything I've ever read on the sub

Re: VPN fustration

well it looks like a shout out of the desert :-) i don't remember your initial post. if you're interested, we set up a nice configuration where several remote adsl servers connect to a main site, each remote establishing a vpn with a server gateway on the main site, and we wrote some stuff to ha

Re: VPN fustration

On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 13:01, James Pifer wrote: > > I've posted to this list three times asking about VPN, IPSec or PPTP, > for Redhat 7.2.I've been trying to get linux-pptp working without > success so far.I can't seem to find any help on it. > > I have not received one response on my other th

Re: VPN fustration

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 02:01:01PM -0500, James Pifer wrote: : I've posted to this list three times asking about VPN, IPSec or PPTP, : for Redhat 7.2.I've been trying to get linux-pptp working without : success so far.I can't seem to find any help on it. Has it occurred to you that nobody on thi

RE: VPN fustration

Try here http://www.rommel.stw.uni-erlangen.de/~hshoexer/ipsec-howto/HOWTO.html -Original Message- From: James Pifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:01 PM To: redhat Subject: VPN fustration I've posted to this list three times asking about VPN, IPSec or

Re: VPN Problem with multiple connections

Jon Hoffman wrote: > Hi, > I have a kind of strange VPN setup, we have multiple offices and each office > has multiple people VPNing back to the main office. The problem is the VPN > connection goes through a Red Hat 7.1 server set up as a router at each > office. So when more then one person V

Re: VPN Solution

FreeS/WAN, at www.freeswan.org, has been working well for me once I finally got the configs right. So far the only peer in the net is an OpenBSD box at work, which also works really well. I do have one, sort-of-off-topic gripe, which is that they refuse to make their mailing list subscribers-onl

RE: VPN questions

On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Cassell, Damon wrote: > > I'm currently using the Nortel Client (Win95) to connect to my office and > > AFAIK there is not a way to connect at the client level. I've heard > > indirectly that it may be possible to connect at the network level > (router) > > but I don't hav

RE: VPN questions

> I'm currently using the Nortel Client (Win95) to connect to my office and > AFAIK there is not a way to connect at the client level. I've heard > indirectly that it may be possible to connect at the network level (router) > but I don't have an hard information on that either. My solution is

Re: VPN questions

On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 04:47:48PM +0530, Vineeta wrote: > Try using VNC viewer which is available for windows,unix e.t.c. > ... > It is a great tool.I have used it.It is as good as transferring control > of your entire pc onto your desktop(X-windows) here. It is, indeed, a good tool and the pric

Re: VPN questions

I still am not sure what you would like to do,but what i gather is that you want to access a machine from home which is a linux box. Try using VNC viewer which is available for windows,unix e.t.c. There's a concept of client and server here.Basically,the server runs on the remote machine which yo

Re: VPN questions

Peter Ferrigan wrote: > > Hi. > > I have a question regarding VPN and Redhat. In order to access my office > network from home, I have to use the Nortel Extranet Client for Windows NT. > Basically, it connects to the Nortel switch and then uses a software token > challenge to connect. Upon con

Re: VPN questions

Let me get the question clear. Do you want to access your office network from home where you have a linux box? If yes,then,what kind of O.S do you have in the office?And,is it only one machine you want to access from your home or the entire network? Also,what kind of applications do u want to acc

RE: VPN suggestions?

On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Nate Golnik wrote: > There are a couple of good VPN solutions out there. I would stay > away from the IPsec in Linux. There are a few security bugs which > need to be worked out. There is also a problem with routing > multiple subnest through one connection with it. I ass

Re: VPN suggestions?

Martin Sieben wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Jamin Collins wrote: > > > Take a look at PoPToP, it's an opensource implimentation of an MS compatible > > VPN server for Linux. > > If I remember correct PPTP has some bug issues. Unfortunaly I#ve forgotten > the link I believe (recalling stateme

RE: VPN suggestions?

There are a couple of good VPN solutions out there. I would stay away from the IPsec in Linux. There are a few security bugs which need to be worked out. There is also a problem with routing multiple subnest through one connection with it. OpenBSD has the best implementation for IPsec. The be

  1   2   >