At 23:36 10/10/2003, you wrote:
I am running sendmail-8.12.8-9.80 on a redhat 8.0 box. My mail has been
running just fine for a long time but I have a very annoying problem. I
get 2 Drafts, Sent and Trash folders for each inbox I have for my users.
INBOX.Drafts, Drafts, INBOX.Sent, Sent, INBOX.Tr
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 06:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am running sendmail-8.12.8-9.80 on a redhat 8.0 box. My mail has been
> running just fine for a long time but I have a very annoying problem. I
> get 2 Drafts, Sent and Trash folders for each inbox I have for my users.
> INB
Hi Guys,
I am running sendmail-8.12.8-9.80 on a redhat 8.0 box. My mail has been
running just fine for a long time but I have a very annoying problem. I
get 2 Drafts, Sent and Trash folders for each inbox I have for my users.
INBOX.Drafts, Drafts, INBOX.Sent, Sent, INBOX.Trash and Trash. Is th
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:35:06PM -0700, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> Secondly..I saw some postings on google talking about never ever opening
> up port 25 and just using port 110 (pop3). I want to setup a web server
> and sendmail on it. I Need port 25, correct? If I want to email anyone
> that is ;)
Thank youI completely agree as well.
Jeff
--
Above all, my brothers, do not swear--not by heaven or by earth or by
anything else. Let your "Yes" be yes, and your "No," no, or you will be
condemned.
- James 5:12 (NIV)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 11:41, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> Yes, please give me the resources to look at or purchase.
> Im very concerned over security issues as security, especially
> these days, is such a concern on the internet.
These are all free resources found on the Linux Documentation Project
homepag
Yes, please give me the resources to look at or purchase.
Im very concerned over security issues as security, especially
these days, is such a concern on the internet.
Ive been a software engineer for years, and have done some sysadmin
stuff on and off. I have the book, Linux 7 unleashed (older n
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 01:35, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> Hello-
>
> Im new to setting up sendmail (relatively). I tried it on my
> Solaris box so Im a *little* familiar with it all.
[snip]
Res gave you some very good tips and instructions, but I'd like to
suggest one small (but very important) piece of
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> My question is, is it better to use the Redhat RPM's for sendmail
> and just setup the config's or is it better to download the sendmail
> suite from www.sendmail.org and go from there?
Stick with Red Hat's rpm, if you've never compiled and setup sendmail
b
Hello-
Im new to setting up sendmail (relatively). I tried it on my
Solaris box so Im a *little* familiar with it all.
My question is, is it better to use the Redhat RPM's for sendmail
and just setup the config's or is it better to download the sendmail
suite from www.sendmail.org and go from t
Gads,
Sorry for the typo's. Here's a corrected question...
remote_mail_server.com acts as a front end server and spam filter for
another domain's (relayed_domain.com) mail and then forwards it on to
the mail server at:
mailhost.relayed_domain.com
remote_mai
Gads,
Sorry for the typo's. Here's a corrected question...
remote_mail_server.com acts as a front end server and spam filter for
another domain's (relayed_domain.com) mail and then forwards it on to
the mail server at:
mailhost.relayed_domain.com
remote_mai
Hello,
I posted this to the sendmail list but know there're some very smart
folks here too!
remote_mail_server.com acts as a front end server and spam filter for
another domain's (relayed_domain.com) mail and then forwards it on to
the mail server at:
mailhost.relayed_domain.com
Paul Greene wrote:
I would still like the root user to be able to receive e-mailed system
warning messages from localhost. Will disabling Sendmail prevent that
from happening?
If you have not forwarded root's mail, then it will slowly accumulate in
/var/spool/mail/root. If you have forward root'
thanks!
Paul
Joe Polk wrote:
yes.
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 17:32, Paul Greene wrote:
I would still like the root user to be able to receive e-mailed system
warning messages from localhost. Will disabling Sendmail prevent that
from happening?
Paul
Anthony E. Greene wrote:
Paul Greene w
yes.
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 17:32, Paul Greene wrote:
>
> I would still like the root user to be able to receive e-mailed system
> warning messages from localhost. Will disabling Sendmail prevent that
> from happening?
>
> Paul
>
> Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>
> > Paul Greene wrote:
> >
> >> If
I would still like the root user to be able to receive e-mailed system
warning messages from localhost. Will disabling Sendmail prevent that
from happening?
Paul
Anthony E. Greene wrote:
Paul Greene wrote:
If you disable sendmail in rc3.d or rc5.d, does it disable it
completely? Or does it j
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> Paul Greene wrote:
> > If you disable sendmail in rc3.d or rc5.d, does it disable it
> > completely? Or does it just disable it's ability to receive mail, but
> > will still send mail when needed?
>
> It will no longer be running, so you can't con
gt;
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 16:39, Paul Greene wrote:
> I think this should be a fairly easy sendmail question. (?)
>
> If you disable sendmail in rc3.d or rc5.d, does it disable it
> completely? Or does it just disable it's ability to receive mail, but
> will still s
Paul Greene wrote:
If you disable sendmail in rc3.d or rc5.d, does it disable it
completely? Or does it just disable it's ability to receive mail, but
will still send mail when needed?
It will no longer be running, so you can't connect to it using SMTP, but
you can still send outgoing mail by ca
Paul Greene wrote:
I think this should be a fairly easy sendmail question. (?)
If you disable sendmail in rc3.d or rc5.d, does it disable it
completely? Or does it just disable it's ability to receive mail, but
will still send mail when needed?
Paul
It disables completely.
If you wa
Paul Greene wrote:
I think this should be a fairly easy sendmail question. (?)
If you disable sendmail in rc3.d or rc5.d, does it disable it
completely? Or does it just disable it's ability to receive mail, but
will still send mail when needed?
Paul
I'd do a
# chkconfig --l
Paul Greene said:
> I think this should be a fairly easy sendmail question. (?)
>
> If you disable sendmail in rc3.d or rc5.d, does it disable it
> completely? Or does it just disable it's ability to receive mail, but
> will still send mail when needed?
if the sendmail daemon,
I think this should be a fairly easy sendmail question. (?)
If you disable sendmail in rc3.d or rc5.d, does it disable it
completely? Or does it just disable it's ability to receive mail, but
will still send mail when needed?
Paul
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[
EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail question
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:04:39PM -0800, Nick White wrote:
> I have sendmail configured exactly like the 7.2 server. Only, it
> takes a little longer to rel
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:04:39PM -0800, Nick White wrote:
> I have sendmail configured exactly like the 7.2 server. Only, it takes
> a little longer to relay messages. With RedHat 7.2, if I sent myself a
> message from yahoo, it'd go through almost instantly. With the new 8.0
> server, it take
We've had a mail relay server running RedHat 7.2 for a while now. We
wanted to use LVM and reconfigure the partitioning on the server, so we
decided to reload the server with RedHat 8.0.
I have sendmail configured exactly like the 7.2 server. Only, it takes
a little longer to relay messages. Wi
Something that has been bothering me for a while but never got around to.
We grab all our mail from our ISP using fetchmail to distribute it to local
users. However, when an e-mails domain does not resolve, fetchmail warns me
of this but doesn't flush the message, with as a result that every time
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 14:19:42 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>So what's your point?
I just though it would be nice if someone answered the actual question,
that's all. No flame bait involved.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.c
So what's your point?
Ok, the above was flame bait. This is a list, and one of the disadvantages
of a list, if it's indeed a disadvantage, is that the conversations
can get out of the control of the person who started a thread. That's
similar to face to face conversations with more than 2 peopl
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002 06:47:49 -0700 (PDT), Al wrote:
>Well, qmail and sendmail, as do most mail transport agents (MTA) have
>one thing in common. They actually don't do password authentication.
>They just deliver mail.
[snip]
I'll just point out that Matthew Scarrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was the
o
Well, qmail and sendmail, as do most mail transport agents (MTA) have
one thing in common. They actually don't do password authentication.
They just deliver mail.
Now, unlike sendmail, qmail does come with a POP3 package installed, and
that's presumably because qmail's default install settings u
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 23:30:03 -0700 (PDT), Al wrote:
>Wow! I can't help but feel you're on the wrong track. Perhaps you've
>seen a email client that used the [EMAIL PROTECTED] syntax but
>actually logged onto the pop server using "username", and used
>"@yourdomain.com" part to figure out the host
So to summarize,
* you have created accounts on RH that have "@" userid's
in the userid.
* Email isn't reaching those accounts, because sendmail is attempting
to deliver to
username
on the loal machine, instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is literally the name of that account.
Wo
I know it's possible to have a email system where the user logs in with
there email address. I don't know how this is done though. I've been
trying to configure sendmail to do this but with no luck. I create a
user that has a name like [EMAIL PROTECTED] .The user is able to
login to the pop3 serve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-Aug-2002/09:15 +0800, Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This was assigned Bug# 57216 in Red Hat's Bugzilla:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57216
>>
>> But I think the proposed fix is incorrect. The initial
> This was assigned Bug# 57216 in Red Hat's Bugzilla:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57216
>
> But I think the proposed fix is incorrect. The initial proposed fix
> rebuilds the db files whether they need it or not. I added my proposed
> fix, which checks the result of t
> I always see messages in /var/log/messages that the db's have been rebuilt
> after running the service restart command. You might want to check there
> to see what's happening on your server.
Absolutely nothing except the service sendmail stop, service sendmail start
lines.
I remember seeing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anthony,
Am Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:45:46 -0400 schrieb "Anthony E. Greene"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
>Now that you mention it, I've seen this before too. So I took a look
>at the sendmail initscript. The problem is that the section of code
>that rebuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-Aug-2002/13:36 +0800, Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The initscript that is run by the 'service' command will rebuild db files,
>> including access.db.
>
>Actually Tony I've heard that before from other people over the years as
>we
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> > The initscript that is run by the 'service' command will rebuild db files,
> > including access.db.
>
> Actually Tony I've heard that before from other people over the years as
> well, but it doesn't seem to work on my server. The datestamp remains
> The initscript that is run by the 'service' command will rebuild db files,
> including access.db.
Actually Tony I've heard that before from other people over the years as
well, but it doesn't seem to work on my server. The datestamp remains the
same as the access text file unless I run make, af
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-Aug-2002/11:23 +0800, Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> compile sendmail.cf file with the "Black Recipients feature". Then in the
>> "access" file
>> you may put only only senders rules, but recipient ones.
>> Example:
>>
>> mysql
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 12 August 2002 11:23 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> > compile sendmail.cf file with the "Black Recipients feature". Then in
> > the "access" file
> > you may put only only senders rules, but recipient ones.
> > Example:
> >
> > mysqlREJECT
> compile sendmail.cf file with the "Black Recipients feature". Then in the
> "access" file
> you may put only only senders rules, but recipient ones.
> Example:
>
> mysqlREJECT
AND run
'make' to make the new access.db database AND then run
'service sendmail restart'
I think. At least that
ccounts have nothing to do with the mail ones.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:47 PM
Subject: Sendmail question. How to disallow user from having an e-mail
account on mail server.
> How do I disallo
How do I disallow user of the server from having an account on Sendmail on the same
server?
--- Reply to a message ---
By: Manoj
->: a Mail
:>: RE: Sendmail question.
> I mean to set up a mail server using sendmail for deliver and
> retrieve mails which can then be downloaded by client accounts.
try
up2date --install fetchmail
configure it
done
now every user wi
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 15/04/2002 at 10:46 PM Billy R Nordyke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Does the linuxconf mailconf work properly with RH 7.2?
Don't use Linuxconf, just a text editor is best.
Harry has supplied the rest.
Regards
Greg Wright
--
IT Consultant Sydn
Thanks for the info. I'll give it a try. Time for bed now so it'll have
to wait for a day or two. I'm just trying to learn about linux and how
to make it work for you. I've got it on 3 computers all dualbooted with
win98 and all networked together. It's like a puzzle, kind of gets under
your
Billy R Nordyke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does the linuxconf mailconf work properly with RH 7.2? The FAQs at
> sendmail.org say not to use it to edit sendmail.cf with RH 7.1. What is
> the proper config program for sendmail? Is it proper to use emacs to
> edit sendmail.cf? I have read the
Does the linuxconf mailconf work properly with RH 7.2? The FAQs at
sendmail.org say not to use it to edit sendmail.cf with RH 7.1. What is
the proper config program for sendmail? Is it proper to use emacs to
edit sendmail.cf? I have read the man pages for sendmail and have
visited sendmail.org
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 2/04/2002 at 2:37 PM Kerry Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gregausit/redhat-list] wrote:
>Ok guys, I'm back again... I have this in my Sendmail 8.8 server
>sendmail.cf file and (before I rem-ed it out) it would allow us to send
>mail
>to our own domail bu
Ok guys, I'm back again... I have this in my Sendmail 8.8 server
sendmail.cf file and (before I rem-ed it out) it would allow us to send mail
to our own domail but not outside. Here's what I've got right now:
# added 04022002 by KWM
#FR-o /etc/sendmail.cR
#Sche
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sendmail question
I'm a neophyte at Sendmail, so here goes nuthin'
We're running an older version of Sendmail, 8.8.7-20, but I'm not in charge
of the upgrade so I can't do that right now. ORDB.org says we're an open
relay and I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kerry Miller wrote:
>Are there any sendmail people out there who could help me get started? I'd
>settle for a link with more info than the anti-spam links on sendmail.com.
You will find tons of useful (and searchable) information about sendmail
at
I'm a neophyte at Sendmail, so here goes nuthin'
We're running an older version of Sendmail, 8.8.7-20, but I'm not in charge
of the upgrade so I can't do that right now. ORDB.org says we're an open
relay and I can't figure out how to tighten it up. I've tried a couple of
things on the sendm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Ed Wilts wrote:
>> >I am developing a webserver in Linux and want to use it as a e-mail
>> >server.
>>
>> The default sendmail settings will probably do what you need if you just
>> need to deliver mail that was generated by the w
> >I am developing a webserver in Linux and want to use it as a e-mail
> >server.
>
> The default sendmail settings will probably do what you need if you just
> need to deliver mail that was generated by the web server.
Actually, the default will not allow you to receive mail. Check the Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Manoj wrote:
>I am developing a webserver in Linux and want to use it as a e-mail
>server.
The default sendmail settings will probably do what you need if you just
need to deliver mail that was generated by the web server.
If yo
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Manoj wrote:
> I am developing a webserver in Linux and want to use it as a e-mail server.
>
Check out squirrelmail. They even have rpms for Redhat.
--
Gerry
"The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne" Chaucer
___
Redha
I am developing a webserver in Linux and want to use it as a e-mail server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phil G
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail question.
Hello Manoj
Could you
Message -
From: "Manoj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:57 PM
Subject: Sendmail question.
> Hello,
>
> Can I use sendmail to send and receive mail as well. If so where can I get
> stan
]
Subject: Re: Sendmail question.
If you mean to read and write email the answer is no. For that you need a
"mail user agent" like pine, elm, balsa, etc.
Mark
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Manoj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can I use sendmail to send and receive mail as well. If so where c
If you mean to read and write email the answer is no. For that you need a
"mail user agent" like pine, elm, balsa, etc.
Mark
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Manoj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can I use sendmail to send and receive mail as well. If so where can I get
> standard configuration for sendmail settings
Hello,
Can I use sendmail to send and receive mail as well. If so where can I get
standard configuration for sendmail settings.
Thanks,
Manoj
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
At 06:13 PM 3/3/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>On 3 Mar 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> > Look at /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and you should find:
> > dnl This changes sendmail to only listen on the loopback device
> > 127.0.0.1
> > dnl and not on any other network devices. Comment this out if you want
> > dnl
At 01:17 PM 3/3/2002 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>Look at /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and you should find:
>dnl This changes sendmail to only listen on the loopback device
>127.0.0.1
>dnl and not on any other network devices. Comment this out if you want
>dnl to accept email over the network.
>DAEMON_O
On 3 Mar 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Look at /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and you should find:
> dnl This changes sendmail to only listen on the loopback device
> 127.0.0.1
> dnl and not on any other network devices. Comment this out if you want
> dnl to accept email over the network.
> DAEMON_OPTIONS
Look at /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and you should find:
dnl This changes sendmail to only listen on the loopback device
127.0.0.1
dnl and not on any other network devices. Comment this out if you want
dnl to accept email over the network.
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')
So, commen
I cannot telnet to port 25 of a machine using it's fully qualified host
name, but I can log into the machine and telnet to localhost 25 and read
sendmail. Any idea why? It's generating error messages when trying to
send mail to users on this machine, because other machines get connection
ref
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger:
We are always glad to help, but you must also help us.
Below is what your message looks like, after the headers have been
stripped from it. Your nearly 9000-byte message contained, by my
count, 231 bytes of content (which I challenge you
Thanks
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Redhat mailing list wrote:
>
> > NOQUEUE: mailer156.flowgo.com [64.124.202.156] did not issue
> > MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA.
> >
> > I got a lot of like of this messages on my logfile.Anybody can
> > tell me what this me
Redhat mailing list wrote:
> NOQUEUE: mailer156.flowgo.com [64.124.202.156] did not issue
> MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA.
>
> I got a lot of like of this messages on my logfile. Anybody can
> tell me what this means. How do I fixed it?
You don't. It's not something your do
Hello,
I got this on my logfile:
NOQUEUE: mailer156.flowgo.com [64.124.202.156] did not issue
MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA.
I got a lot of like of this messages on my logfile. Anybody can
tell me what this means. How do I fixed it?
tnx
carlo
___
Steve Kieu wrote:
> Yes, they block port 25, I have just use telnet a host
> using port 25 to telnet to a host and it says Network
> unreachable; If I telnet the same host and use
> different port, like 80; I can connect to the host of
> course this case it will have a page ...; as normal
> port 2
Can you arrange with your slow ISP to relay your mail when you are
connected to your fast ISP? You'd need to have an IP to give them. That
way when connected to either your mail would still go through.
Course, if they filter port 25 then you are out of luck. I know nothing
about it, but may
Yes, they block port 25, I have just use telnet a host
using port 25 to telnet to a host and it says Network
unreachable; If I telnet the same host and use
different port, like 80; I can connect to the host of
course this case it will have a page ...; as normal
port 23 is okay; just 25. Well they
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Steve Kieu wrote:
> I have asked them and they only said I should use
> their web mail instead, their service is not available
> for out look express mail and udora , bla bla.. even
> they do not say anything technically...; They have a
> web based email for their customers bu
I have asked them and they only said I should use
their web mail instead, their service is not available
for out look express mail and udora , bla bla.. even
they do not say anything technically...; They have a
web based email for their customers but I would like
to set my own smtp because I use p
At 11:33 AM 5/5/01 +1000, you wrote:
>I got two ISP one it has pop3 and smtp service ; wth
>that one I have no problem using sendmail and
>fetchmail in my box ; But the other doesn't support
>pop3 mail and smtp; then I can not use sendmail; I
>think as I use my own smtp server and pop3 but they
>b
Hi,
I got two ISP one it has pop3 and smtp service ; wth
that one I have no problem using sendmail and
fetchmail in my box ; But the other doesn't support
pop3 mail and smtp; then I can not use sendmail; I
think as I use my own smtp server and pop3 but they
block port 25 (just guess) then the mai
Make sure that the domain name, your using, is listed in local-host-names
and also in relay-domains. Also have you check www.sendmail.com about
virtual domains?
At 11:46 AM 4/21/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Here is the output of that...
>
>[root@guinness /etc]# /usr/sbin/sendmail -bp -d0.11
>Version
sendmail.cw is the same thing as local-host-names. Either file is fine as
long as you state in sendmail.cf the /path/file to use.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Jake McHenry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 10:46 AM
Here is the output of that...
[root@guinness /etc]# /usr/sbin/sendmail -bp -d0.11
Version 8.11.0
Compiled with: LDAPMAP MAP_REGEX LOG MATCHGECOS MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7
NAMED_BIND NETINET NETUNIX NEWDB NIS QUEUE SASL SCANF SMTP
USERDB
OS Defines: HASFCHOWN HASFLOCK
Check sendmail.cw or local-host-names file for your domain name. Try
running /usr/sbin/sendmail -bp -d0.11 It will tell some good information.
Hope this helps.
At 11:35 AM 4/21/01 -0400, you wrote:
>I've been trying to set up the virtusertable file, but haven't been having
>much
>success. I p
I've been trying to set up the virtusertable file, but haven't been having much
success. I put the entries into the file, then run makemap hash
/etc/mail/virtusertable < /etc/mail/virtusertable
like I'm supposed to, right? Then I restart sendmail, and telnet localhost 25
helo localhost
expn ac
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001 00:59:19 Russell W. Behne wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> Using fetchmail with a dialup connection is nice because you can run
>> it from your /etc/ppp/if-up.local script to get all the mail for local
>> users when ever you connect to the net. You ca
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Russell W. Behne wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> > Using fetchmail with a dialup connection is nice because you can run
> > it from your /etc/ppp/if-up.local script to get all the mail for local
> > users when ever you connect to the net. You can a
Message from Wolfgang Pfeiffer on Fri, 16 Feb 2001, 23:53 <+0100>:
>
> [ ... ]
I made a mistake here:
> this is my .fetchmailrc (I changed some values for the posting):
> -
> defaults
> poll pop.blablamail.de
> protocol POP3
> username your_
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Linda Hanigan wrote:
>
> Thanks for your help seting up pine so the address is right. It now
> is working to send mail. Now to do the setup for recieving mail.
> I compiled and installed the newest fetchmail and downloaded
> procmail. I will install it next. Will I need to do
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> First this:
> I am new to Linux, but I *hope* nevertheless that I didn't make any
> mistakes in the following advice ... the following configuration works on
> my machine (with RedHat 6.1 on it): I can't guarantee it will work on
> yours ...
>
> Linda, I do not think
Just a lil' correction (Sorry, English's not my first language ...):
--
Wolfgang Pfeiffer
My new mail-address: please see 'From' header this mail
http://www.geocities.com/wolfgangpfeiffer
Message from Wolfgang Pfeiffer on Fri, 16 Feb 2001, 23:53 <+0100>:
> [ ... ]
>
> Again: try to run some
First this:
I am new to Linux, but I *hope* nevertheless that I didn't make any
mistakes in the following advice ... the following configuration works on
my machine (with RedHat 6.1 on it): I can't guarantee it will work on
yours ...
Linda, I do not think it's too complicated ... I had exactly
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Linda Hanigan wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't know why it ate my message. so I'll try again. I just want
> to be able to read and send mail form a console program. I would
> like to pick up the mail then disconnect while I read it. I tried
> pine to send a message. However it does mix
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:11:49 Linda Hanigan wrote:
>
>>
>> Fetchmail can be configured to give the mail directly to procmail, so
>> you do not need to run sendmail. But running sendmail does not add that
>> much of a load to the system if you do not have a lot of messages.
>> Besides, it will let
Hi,
I don't know why it ate my message.
so I'll try again.
I just want to be able to read and send
mail form a console program.
I would like to pick up the mail then
disconnect while I read it.
I tried pine to send a message. However
it does mixes the name I
need for my ISP and my local login and
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Linda Hanigan wrote:
>
> >
> > Fetchmail can be configured to give the mail directly to procmail, so
> > you do not need to run sendmail. But running sendmail does not add that
> > much of a load to the system if you do not have a lot of messages.
> > Besides, it will let y
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:39:06 Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Linda Hanigan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> If I use fetchmail to get my mail,
>> I take it I must run sendmail to
>> recieve the mail on my local machine.
>> Is there an easy way to set up
>> sendmail so it only runs when
>> I
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
