Hello all,
Please consider voting on the addition of msieve to sage. This
includes an interface file and an .spkg. Msieve, by Jason
Papadopoulos, should increase the integer factorization functionality
of Sage. I'll quote the words of Jason in the Readme file by way of
explanation:
There
On Feb 19, 12:51 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:48 AM, jeffblakeslee jeffb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Please consider voting on the addition of msieve to sage. This
includes an interface file and an .spkg.
Where is the interface file and
Dear developers,
Singular-3-0-4 introduced a bug that made one of my computations not
work. It did work with Singular-3-0-3, and some tests indicate that it
would also work with the current CVS version of Singular-3-1-0.
So, I tried two things
1. Take a Singular-3-0-3-spkg from a previous sage
PS:
2. Create an spkg for Singular-3-1-0-beta, and install it.
Thanks to Michael and Martin for helping me to create the spkg!
Cheers,
Simon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On Feb 19, 1:50 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Simon,
PS: 2. Create an spkg for Singular-3-1-0-beta, and install it.
Thanks to Michael and Martin for helping me to create the spkg!
Yeah, that was more than a couple emails to sort it all out, but now
you should be
3. A segfault on OS X 10.5 32-bit Intel (bsd.math.washington.edu):
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_finite_field.py
A mysterious error (perphaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have
crashed doctest.
[22.7 s]
Doing this again with --verbose
Dear Michael,
On Feb 19, 10:56 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
...
Other than that: Is this the beta9 snapshot you are having trouble
with or the CVS checkout? I don't have too much time this week for
experiments, but a build log might shed some light on this.
It is the current
hello all,
i've posted this in sage-support with no luck. Strikes me it might be
for sage-devel...
I've installed the latest package for emacs, now with sage-view. Wow !
very very cool, all the bugs are gone.
I was wondering, however, how the plots work within sage-view : if i
try
P=
Doron Zeilberger recently wrote one of his (in?)famous opinions in
response to Freeman Dyson's article on birds and frogs in the AMS Notices:
http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion95.html
He writes:
...even more important, for the progress of mathematics in the
computer age, is the
Hi Pierre,
I've installed the latest package for emacs, now with sage-view. Wow !
very very cool, all the bugs are gone.
Thanks to Nick Alexander's great work!
could i combine this behavior with the nice formulae of sage-view ?
this would be the definite death of the notebook for me (not
Can William or someone who gets this error (I don't!) test what
happens if you replace
G=E.change_ring(GF(p)).abelian_group()
by
N=E.change_ring(GF(p)).cardinality()
? The cardinality will be provided by pari, so if it is a pari
problem that should still cause a problem. The abelian
On Thursday 19 February 2009, mabshoff wrote:
On Feb 19, 1:50 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Simon,
PS: 2. Create an spkg for Singular-3-1-0-beta, and install it.
Thanks to Michael and Martin for helping me to create the spkg!
Yeah, that was more than a couple
On Feb 19, 3:39 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
On Thursday 19 February 2009, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
It isn't what we want to do in general in the future, but it should
fix your problem. I have no idea if this causes a performance impact,
but Martin might be able
Hi,
I'm interfacing a C++ class with cython. Because my C++ class inherit
from a std::basic_string class I inherit some tests method like :
bool My_class :: test_function()
It seems that Cython do not know the C++ bool type and, consequently,
there is no direct conversion between C++
Hello
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Vincent Delecroix
20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm interfacing a C++ class with cython. Because my C++ class inherit
from a std::basic_string class I inherit some tests method like :
bool My_class :: test_function()
It seems that Cython
Hi Martin,
On Feb 19, 12:39 pm, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
On Thursday 19 February 2009, mabshoff wrote:
Simon, since it is rather hard to guess what your problem is exactly, why
don't you just post the SPKG somewhere so that someone else can take a look?
OK, see
On Feb 19, 3:55 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Feb 19, 12:39 pm, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
On Thursday 19 February 2009, mabshoff wrote:
Simon, since it is rather hard to guess what your problem is exactly, why
don't you
Hi Michael
On Feb 19, 12:47 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
...
Simon, since it is rather hard to guess what your problem is exactly, why
don't you just post the SPKG somewhere so that someone else can take a look?
Well, given that it is last week's CVS that might not be a good
On Feb 19, 1:02 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
We discussed that already, but once more: check devel/sage/
module_list.py for all extensions that link against libSingular and
touch them, followed by a sage -b or see below.
Well, you sent me a list of these extensions off list,
On Feb 19, 4:15 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
On Feb 19, 1:02 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
We discussed that already, but once more: check devel/sage/
module_list.py for all extensions that link against libSingular and
touch them, followed
On Feb 19, 4:10 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Michael
On Feb 19, 12:47 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
...
Hi Simon,
Simon, since it is rather hard to guess what your problem is exactly, why
don't you just post the SPKG somewhere so that someone
Hi Michael,
Well, recollecting my memories of the error it looks like you are
still using Singular's NTL or NTL is linked statically into
libSingular or something like that.
From spkg_changes:
rm -rf ntl
rm -rf modules
rm -rf MP
So, there is no NTL in the package.
I don't know if NTL is
You should not post code from
a non-public CVS without the expressed permission of the Singular
team.
That is certainly right. Sorry that I did for a few minutes.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On Feb 19, 4:22 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Michael,
Well, recollecting my memories of the error it looks like you are
still using Singular's NTL or NTL is linked statically into
libSingular or something like that.
From spkg_changes:
rm -rf ntl
rm -rf
(...) Use sage-view in an inferior sage buffer to have all your output
latexed and your plot commands appear inline in the inferior sage
buffer -- after you apply the patch at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5147.
I've not tried it. But it seems to be the thing your are looking
On Feb 19, 5:20 am, Pierre pierre.guil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pierre,
(...) Use sage-view in an inferior sage buffer to have all your output
latexed and your plot commands appear inline in the inferior sage
buffer -- after you apply the patch at
On Feb 19, 1:35 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Are you 100% certain you didn't build singular's NTL version at some
point? Maybe there is a second ntl.h?
I checked. No ntl.h in the spkg.
...
And the above error clearly indicates that there is an NTL mixup since
the error
On Feb 19, 5:29 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
On Feb 19, 1:35 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Are you 100% certain you didn't build singular's NTL version at some
point? Maybe there is a second ntl.h?
I checked. No ntl.h in the spkg.
Ok.
SNIP
BTW, I
* run
hg_sage.apply(http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/
ticket/5147/trac_5147-plot-output-filename.patch)
i've tried that. It didn't seem to complain too much, though i did get
the message:
WARNING:
Make sure to create a ~/.hgrc file:
On Feb 19, 5:29 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
On Feb 19, 1:35 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I copied the info that ./sage -b gave me into some file
installSAGE_B.log.
You can find the two install.log
Hi there:
First of all, I officially release my modifications of the sage logo
under the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license, as
it's a derivative work of Alex's and his license now obliges me to
share-alike ;-)
Now, being settled that, I have some thoughts about the ongoing
Hi Michael,
On Feb 19, 2:37 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
BTW, I think it would be a good thing to be able to up- or downgrade
individual components of Sage. In this case, my motivation was a bug
that only occured in Singular-3-0-4.
This will never work in any reliable way
On Feb 19, 5:56 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Simon,
On Feb 19, 2:37 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
BTW, I think it would be a good thing to be able to up- or downgrade
individual components of Sage. In this case, my motivation was a
On Feb 19, 2:47 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
This seems to be Sage 3.1.2, so is it 3.1.2 or is it upgraded? It
might very well be that this singular.spkg you have been building
needs a recent Sage, but Martin knows more about that glue code than I
do.
It is Sage 3.1.2, built
On Feb 19, 3:02 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
The issue you are hitting are ironically related to the GCD changes in
Singular 3-1-0:
This is the code you have to fix in multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx
if algorithm == ezgcd:
Off(SW_USE_CHINREM_GCD)
On Feb 19, 5:40 am, Pierre pierre.guil...@gmail.com wrote:
* run
Hi Pierre,
hg_sage.apply(http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/
ticket/5147/trac_5147-plot-output-filename.patch)
i've tried that. It didn't seem to complain too much, though i did get
the message:
On Feb 19, 6:18 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
On Feb 19, 3:02 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
The issue you are hitting are ironically related to the GCD changes in
Singular 3-1-0:
This is the code you have to fix in multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx
On Feb 19, 6:28 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 19, 6:18 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
On Feb 19, 3:02 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
The issue you are hitting are ironically related to the GCD changes in
Singular 3-1-0:
This
Thanks Georg, my memory is not what it used to be! I just hate to see
this error recurring apparantly in something I wrote
John
On 19 Feb, 11:29, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can William or someone who gets this error (I don't!) test what
happens if you replace
Thank you for your remarks, William.
By the way, M2 builds much more easily now, basically because it can,
if needed, build, and even download and patch for you, all the
libraries it depends on: singular-factory, singular-libfac, ntl,
frobby, pari, lapack, libgc, gmp, and mpfr. Building seems
It is also quite early on the west
coast, so he might reply soonish. Nick uses MacOSX, so he might be
able to narrow it down quickly.
He just woke up!
Let me make sure I know the situation: you have applied that small
patch, you have installed sage-mode-0.5.1 (from the wiki), and you are
Would that were true! There are plenty of bugs left, maybe you will
help me fix them :)
I am currently working on `the multiple output bug'. More precisely,
in case we run the following code, three overlays should be inserted
in the sage buffer:
m = Matrix(QQ, 5)
m.randomize()
for i in
I hope we will fully support this kind of thing:
%cal 9 1752
September 1752
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Well, someone asked for jokes!
John
On 12 Feb, 08:50, ghtdak gl...@tarbox.org wrote:
On Feb 11, 3:47 pm, mabshoff
Anyone know anything about this?
http://www.spacetime.us/
Not sure what features are only available in Mathematica and Matlab,
but this seems quite impressive. Apparently someone is making money
off of mobile scientific calculation. Maybe Carl's build wasn't the
most pointless ever after
Let me make sure I know the situation: you have applied that small
patch, you have installed sage-mode-0.5.1 (from the wiki), and you are
running Aquamacs?
exactly, but in reverse order (applying the patch came last)
(I haven't tried it with aquamacs.) Also, the
inline equations
On 19-Feb-09, at 9:54 AM, Pierre wrote:
Let me make sure I know the situation: you have applied that small
patch, you have installed sage-mode-0.5.1 (from the wiki), and you
are
running Aquamacs?
exactly, but in reverse order (applying the patch came last)
That's fine.
(I haven't
On 19-Feb-09, at 8:56 AM, Matthias Meulien wrote:
Would that were true! There are plenty of bugs left, maybe you will
help me fix them :)
I am currently working on `the multiple output bug'. More precisely,
in case we run the following code, three overlays should be inserted
in the sage
Not so easy to fix...
With the original code, yes. With the newer code that accumulates
output and post-processes it, not so hard.
Now I agree. The difficult part is having three latex processes with
three sentinels.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
I taught one of the programmers for this, Stephen DeSalvo, a few years
ago; I think he is the brother of the founder, Chris DeSalvo. It was
a dynamical systems course, and I recall that he was interested in
some of the computational aspects so that he could develop things for
this software (then
John Cremona wrote:
I hope we will fully support this kind of thing:
%cal 9 1752
September 1752
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Well, someone asked for jokes!
Already done :)
sage: !cal 9r 1752r
September 1752
Su Mo Tu We Th
sage: !cal 9r 1752r
September 1752
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Wow, that's amazing. What about in Russia or Italy, though?
As a non-joke, this isn't ?-able, though. How would someone find this
by looking under ca[tab]? (You
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
sage: !cal 9r 1752r
September 1752
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Wow, that's amazing. What about in Russia or Italy, though?
As a non-joke, this isn't
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:56 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
3. A segfault on OS X 10.5 32-bit Intel (bsd.math.washington.edu):
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_finite_field.py
A mysterious error (perphaps a memory error?) occurred, which may
And this BS since it is not running out of memory:
sage: for p in prime_range(390,1):
if p%13==1: print get_memory_usage()
v.append(E.change_ring(GF(p)))
...
139.0
139.0
139.0
140.0
141.0
141.0
141.0
error: no more memory
System 5120k:5120k Appl 4638k/481k Malloc
On Feb 19, 11:36 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:56 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
3. A segfault on OS X 10.5 32-bit Intel (bsd.math.washington.edu):
SNIP
Anyway, John, you don't have to worry about this anymore, since it has
nothing
On Feb 19, 11:51 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
And this BS since it is not running out of memory:
SNIP
Hi Martin,
OK, this is a singular problem for sure. Check this out:
That's only on OSX, right?
Yes.
I just tried it on my 64-bit Linux box and
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:40 PM, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you post a picture of it running Sage?
Very impressive work!
I got my brother to take some pictures; the results are here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/timrwit/3292837101/
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl Witty wrote:
Unfortunately, it's far too slow to be useful for anything ...
cool story, but how about sympy, have you tried it? it's maybe worth a
try!
I never had any intention of doing computations with
In IRC I had a question and I don't know how to do it ...
If you have a solution of an equation, how to apply the result to a
function?
sage: var('x y')
(x, y)
sage: solve([x+y==6, x-y==4], x, y)
[[x == 5, y == 1]]
sage: f = 2*x+y
The best I came up is
sage: f.subs(dict([ (s.lhs() , s.rhs())
On 19-Feb-09, at 9:54 AM, Pierre wrote:
Let me make sure I know the situation: you have applied that small
patch, you have installed sage-mode-0.5.1 (from the wiki), and you
are
running Aquamacs?
exactly, but in reverse order (applying the patch came last)
(I haven't tried it with
On Feb 19, 10:18 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd do something like this:
yes, thanks. it's just not very intuitive because you have to know the
solution_dict parameter in advance. i don't know, but it would be
interesting if a syntax like f(sol[0]) could be implemented - or does
it
Hi,
See below. There will be a Sage workshop in 2010 in February in the
beautiful CIRM in Marseille France
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thierry Monteil thierry.mont...@lirmm.fr
Date: Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:10 PM
Subject: Thematic month Math-Info CIRM 2010 - First
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 19, 12:51 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:48 AM, jeffblakeslee jeffb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Please consider voting on the addition of msieve to sage. This
On Feb 18, 10:41 am, mark mcclure mcmcc...@unca.edu wrote:
On Feb 18, 12:33 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
3.3.rc2 has been out for a good half day,
I get an error building GMP on my MacBook Pro running
OS X 10.4.11. The partial log, starting where I think
things went
Hi,
The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
Nick
(*
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The University of Tennessee. All rights
reserved.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
Nick
It doesn't raise any red flags for me. I do wonder -- precisely how
does it differ
William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
Nick
It doesn't raise any red flags for me. I do wonder --
So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
naive Cholesky is a few dozen lines, so I could probably just crack a
text book :)
Thanks for the replies.
Nick
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
naive Cholesky is a few dozen lines, so I could probably just crack a
text
Nick Alexander wrote:
So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
naive Cholesky is a few dozen lines, so I could probably just crack a
text book :)
Well, I think the point is that there is
On 19-Feb-09, at 10:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com
wrote:
So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
naive Cholesky is a
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19-Feb-09, at 10:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com
wrote:
So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
The author
72 matches
Mail list logo
