> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 October 2005 17:26
> To: 'James Developers List'
> Subject: Re: Re: IMAP status
>
> > Users are going to want to extend James' Message Store Model.
> > A single interface that acts like a "Virtual File Sys
Logging is the key to this (duh).
James is currently quite poor at logging at the mailet & matcher level
because of the patchy implementation. A matcher and mailet should always log
the fact that they have "seen" a message (i.e. matched or processed it). At
the moment lots of them don't.
The comme
> -Original Message-
> From: Kervin L. Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 August 2005 13:35
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: IMAP
>
> Hello Jason,
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
> > 2) Support hierarchical stores and all the required metho
> -Original Message-
> From: Kervin L. Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 August 2005 14:51
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: IMAP
>
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> >
> > IIRC current IMAP support does not persist messages.
> > This is a blocking issue. We can add it when it
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 August 2005 01:02
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Did we mean to enable JMX by default?
>
> > -
> class="org.apache.avalon.phoenix.components.manager.NoopSystemManager"
> > +
> class="org.apache.aval
+1 Stefano Bagnara
+1 Mike Heath
-- Jason
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g (there are a few
of these)
* Add in/correct database support
* Alpha 2 release
After that we shall see
>
> -Antonio
>
>
>
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: giovedi 23 giugno 2005 11.44
> A: 'James Developers List'
> Og
Apologies, Antonio.
I had intended to respond to your previous email but I'm a bit busy at the
moment.
The IMAP dev branch is at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/branches/imap-dev
The main piece of work still to is to map & adapt the current James
repository system onto the IMAP serv
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 June 2005 15:37
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Proposal for Web Admin Console
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
>
> > I've looked at the JMX support before and there wa
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 June 2005 15:37
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Proposal for Web Admin Console
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
>
> > I've looked at the JMX support before and there wa
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 June 2005 14:58
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Proposal for Web Admin Console
>
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>
> > I know in past there was an Avalon<->Jetty adapter.
>
> > Jetty is a slim servlet
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 June 2005 14:58
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Proposal for Web Admin Console
>
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>
> > I know in past there was an Avalon<->Jetty adapter.
>
> > Jetty is a slim servlet
4:32
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: Summer of Code, james-imap (URGENT)
>
> Dear Jason Webb,
>
> I am a student of the department of Computer Science at the University of
> Bristol in the UK.
> I have recently discovered that google provides the summer of code f
4:32
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: Summer of Code, james-imap (URGENT)
>
> Dear Jason Webb,
>
> I am a student of the department of Computer Science at the University of
> Bristol in the UK.
> I have recently discovered that google provides the summer of code f
now what they are up
against.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Manish Rai Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 June 2005 03:04
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: James-Imap proposal [Jason Webb]
>
> Hello Sir
> I am a student of Nanyang Technological
now what they are up
against.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Manish Rai Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 June 2005 03:04
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: James-Imap proposal [Jason Webb]
>
> Hello Sir
> I am a student of Nanyang Technological
I need to elaborate
> on this.
>
> Of course, we could conciously decide that James will have a fast but
> technically non-compliant search facility instead of a slow but
> compliant one...
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
>
> >I've had a slightly longer think about things and
I need to elaborate
> on this.
>
> Of course, we could conciously decide that James will have a fast but
> technically non-compliant search facility instead of a slow but
> compliant one...
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
>
> >I've had a slightly longer think about things and
5 19:30
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Summer of code - IMAP
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
>
> >BTW IMAP4v1 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2060.txt is a complex protocol.
> >Implementing IMAP on James may sound glamorous but it is *very*
> complicated.
> >I'm
5 19:30
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Summer of code - IMAP
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
>
> >BTW IMAP4v1 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2060.txt is a complex protocol.
> >Implementing IMAP on James may sound glamorous but it is *very*
> complicated.
> >I'm
I've had a slightly longer think about things and there is one critical
piece of functionality that I won't have time to implement in the IMAP
server: IMAP search.
People have had ideas on this before so I suggest you look through the mail
archives, but here's a few thoughts for starters (a forma
I've had a slightly longer think about things and there is one critical
piece of functionality that I won't have time to implement in the IMAP
server: IMAP search.
People have had ideas on this before so I suggest you look through the mail
archives, but here's a few thoughts for starters (a forma
vided a
complete IMAP stack that works, so there is no protocol work to do.
However you do need to be aware of the protocol so you understand what the
stack is telling you.
What we need to do now is marry it up with the main James code.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason W
vided a
complete IMAP stack that works, so there is no protocol work to do.
However you do need to be aware of the protocol so you understand what the
stack is telling you.
What we need to do now is marry it up with the main James code.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason W
If you are interested in the IMAP work you'll need to do the following:
1) Get yourself a decent IDE. I use IntelliJ (a commercial product) but most
people use Eclipse.
2) Check out the source from SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/branches/imap-dev
3) Compile and have a play :)
If you are interested in the IMAP work you'll need to do the following:
1) Get yourself a decent IDE. I use IntelliJ (a commercial product) but most
people use Eclipse.
2) Check out the source from SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/branches/imap-dev
3) Compile and have a play :)
Hi Ben.
As I'm the sucker trying to get IMAP to work I will attempt to fill you in.
If you've checked out the code form SVN you'll need to look at the IMAP2
proposal as this is the one I'm working from. It has a complete protocol
stack but lacks the ability to persist messages to disk for db (it c
Hi Ben.
As I'm the sucker trying to get IMAP to work I will attempt to fill you in.
If you've checked out the code form SVN you'll need to look at the IMAP2
proposal as this is the one I'm working from. It has a complete protocol
stack but lacks the ability to persist messages to disk for db (it c
+1 from me as well
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 May 2005 16:37
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Short term, but immediate, solution to spam volume.
>
> On 5/31/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I propose an i
+1 from me as well
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 May 2005 16:37
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Short term, but immediate, solution to spam volume.
>
> On 5/31/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I propose an i
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 May 2005 09:42
> To: 'James Developers List'
> Subject: Re: Imap
>
> > I am currently developing the IMAP code so it will actually
> > write messages to disk or database rather than just throwing
> > them a
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 May 2005 09:42
> To: 'James Developers List'
> Subject: Re: Imap
>
> > I am currently developing the IMAP code so it will actually
> > write messages to disk or database rather than just throwing
> > them a
I am currently developing the IMAP code so it will actually write messages
to disk or database rather than just throwing them away. This is non-trivial
as it requires integration of the IMAP server code into James as well as
re-engineering the repository code to do the required IMAP operations.
I
I am currently developing the IMAP code so it will actually write messages
to disk or database rather than just throwing them away. This is non-trivial
as it requires integration of the IMAP server code into James as well as
re-engineering the repository code to do the required IMAP operations.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 May 2005 14:20
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Milestone: new trunk/ for development
>
> > As you may have noticed I had fun with the svn copy as I don't
> > use it that often...
>
> :-) Mistak
Thanks for all your work Noel.
As you may have noticed I had fun with the svn copy as I don't use it that
often...
I'm happy with the current imap-dev layout of trunk & proposals as it gives
me the opportunity to branch should I need to do so.
Now all I need to do is add in my changes :)
-- Jaso
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 May 2005 16:22
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: JAMES ... now that we (may be) merged, where to?
>
> On 04/05/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For version 3, then ...
> >
> > -
t;
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 09:42 +0100, Jason Webb wrote:
> > IMHO I'd leave IMAP alone unless you really, really want IMAP.
> > NNTP might be a better option as the IMAP code does not persist anything
> to
> > a permanent store so it's useless for most people at t
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 April 2005 07:55
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: Mina SMTP implementation updates
>
> For those that are interested, I've updated my Mina based SMTP
> implementation. I've added most of the suggest
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 April 2005 22:27
> To: James-Dev Mailing List
> Cc: Darrell DeBoer; Jason Webb
> Subject: Handling the existing proposals/ directory
>
> Jasons and Darrell,
>
> With regard
I'm currently looking at changing the way repositories work for the IMAP
implementation and I do plan to add size (amongst other things) as this
means I don't have to do evil tricks to work out how much is in a
repository. I'm also going to see if I gain benefits from using Java 1.4 NIO
rather than
The options and wording look good to me Danny.
Also, unless anyone has any good reasons why not, that branch_2_1_fcs be
made up as a final release.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 April 2005 09:39
> To: James Developers List
> Subject
Well, possibly not!
I've only been building the IMAP2 tree against the HEAD in cvs (yes it is
that old) and this doesn't use the Bouncycastle stuff
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Web Design by DraegoonZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 April 2005 22:41
> To: server-dev@james.ap
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 April 2005 17:23
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Merging (was [VOTE] POJO pattern)
>
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >>the merging process, which took almost 2 years (until now)
> >
> > Actually, not
+0 in operation, but +1 in principal (because I can't help now)
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 April 2005 09:58
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] POJO pattern
>
> I propose that work commence to extract James's "value add" I
> -Original Message-
> From: Web Design by DraegoonZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 April 2005 16:23
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: IMAP
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Just downloaded the James source.
>
> I'm interested in helping finish the IMAP implementation.
Cool! I have s
> -Original Message-
> From: Soren Hilmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 December 2004 14:15
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Repositories
>
> On Wednesday 22 December 2004 13:50, Danny Angus wrote:
> >
> > Soren,
> > Derby would be embedded in James, it would not be visi
mailbox
never gets deleted!
Does that make sense?
> --Søren
>
>
> On Wednesday 22 December 2004 11:34, Jason Webb wrote:
> > I've only played with Cloudscape before (Derby's forerunner if you don't
> > know, I'm sure Danny does!). How would people feel about
d "issues" for as long as I've been involved and I'd cheer, loudly,
> if we saw the back of them. I believe that the NNTP server uses a much
> simpler format for its file repo's, mabey you could re-use something
> from that?
>
> d.
>
>
> On Wed,
Sorry to all those waiting for the IMAP work to be committed, but what with
changing jobs and looking after 2 small people my time has become a little
tight...
However, this has not stopped me thinking about the biggest issue the IMAP
server faces and that is the repository interface. At the momen
+1
Having used SubVersion for a C# project I'm working on I'm starting to quite
like it.
-- Jason
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r 2004 17:38
> To: James Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Imap / Maildir Status
>
> Serge Sozonoff wrote:
>
> > Jason Webb wrote:
> > > I'm actively working on the IMAP code at the moment.
> > > I think I've got most the building
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 September 2004 21:40
> To: 'James Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Indestructible repositories
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
> > I'm posting this here
I'm posting this here rather than the Avalon list because I can't work out
if my problem is a James issue due to usage or an Avalon issue due to
implementation...
It seems that it is not possible to delete or rename repositories. These two
features are critical for the IMAP work as both are requir
want.
> If nothing else, you might be able to get some ideas from it.
>
> Let me know if you want it, and I'll dig it up...
>
> -jmc
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
>
> >I'm actively working on the IMAP code at the
I'm actively working on the IMAP code at the moment.
I think I've got most the building blocks in place, but who knows :)
Current status is that the IMAP server is now using the James user store (it
wasn't before) and users can (sometimes) create mailboxes, but not delete or
rename them. The next
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 July 2004 04:00
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Cornerstone confusion
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >>Don't think so. What are t
> Don't think so. What are the actual compile errors that come
> up when you exclude cornerstone store impl?
>
Of all these errors (ignoring the warnings) the last error in the list
(SimpleConnectionManager) seems to be the strangest as there appears to be a
conflict between package names for
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 July 2004 17:41
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Committing to HEAD
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
> > I've checked out HEAD (I think :)) to check something and it no l
I've checked out HEAD (I think :)) to check something and it no longer
builds as it complains about various cornerstone problems.
Are there newer Cornerstone libraries available, or do code changes need to
be made?
If they do I'm quite happy to make them, I just need to know
-- Jason
--
I have completed the work on User attributes.
However I am holding off committing any of the changes until Noel completes
the code merge. Is this a good idea?
I would very much like to commit the attribute work before I start the IMAP
work in anger.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 July 2004 13:50
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: User attribute support and API changes
>
>
>
>
>
> > I think this feels contrived, because I can't see the value
> in it, but
> > I could be wr
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 July 2004 09:53
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: User attribute support and API changes
>
>
>
>
>
> What is your reasoning behind making attribute support a
> seperate interface to Mail or User
Some thoughts and notes on implementing the changes required for user
attributes.
I have added a new interface into the mailet API called AttributeSupport.
This interface defines the methods for accessing attributes that is common
to both User and Mail. Therefore User and Mail now implement
Attri
Mine are simple...
0) Debug the mbox random access file class, update the mbox file handler and
commit them both
1) Sort out user attributes. This is done for file user stores, but the db
stuff needs to be re-worked as I'm not happy with it
2) Get the current mailbox system to support folders
3) G
[X] +1 - Release james 2.2.0RC5 as James 2.2.0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 from me
I am now using a18 as my production build.
It does what it says on the tin :) (UK advert)
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 April 2004 16:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Vote to officially release a18 build
>
> I've just
To get
IMAP working there are major 3 pieces of work that need to be
done:
1) Add
attribute support to users (for both file: and db:)- This is required for
storing mailbox settings etc
2)
Ensure that all current mail repositories support attributes for mail - mbox
does not for example :)
3
> -Original Message-
> From: kerr rainey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 January 2004 16:52
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat and James
>
>
>
> > Funnily enough I am right in the middle of configuring jwma - knew
> > there had to be something!
>
> >>A bit offtopic
+1 from me
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 January 2004 04:31
> To: James-Dev Mailing List
> Subject: Migrating James issues from bugzilla to Jira
>
>
> Now that we have installed Jira for the ASF, Serge has
> expressed a desire to migr
> > <...> about Sub version? :-) Want to be the first James
> <.>? We
> are going to have to start migrating to it, anyway, soon enough.
>
> No. That should be a PMC decision, and I think we do it
> once-for-all, when we're asked/invited to not before and not
> piecemeal. Moving to sub
> How do you feel about Subversion? :-) Want to be the first
> James guinea pig? We are going to have to start migrating to
> it, anyway, soon enough.
>
Will all the James projects go to Subversion at once or will we keep CVS
and Subversion together for a while?
Any idea on timeframes as wel
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 December 2003 17:11
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Regarding BUG 24885: RemoteDelivery only tries
> one of multiple A record
>
>
> Søren Hilmer wrote:
> > rawDNSLookup needs to be called twic
James does have rudimentary JMX support at the moment, thanks to Avalon.
What James really needs is instrumentation points (or whatever) in the
code so whatever monitoring framework we use we can get useful data out.
However I think the implementing some of the RFC 2789 structures would
be a good i
better :)
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell DeBoer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 November 2003 12:57
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: CURRENT direction for James :-)
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:26 pm, Jason Webb wrote:
> > I can't r
Hmm.
I suppose this was what I was getting at.
But
Qmail and Sendmail both have facilities to setup SMTP routes to deliver
to alternate ports and this can't be done using DNS trickery.
However, I think a few matcher/mailet tricks will do what I want, so
I'll leave it for now.
-- Jason
> -
I need to develop a system to force mail delivery of certain domains to
go to certain hosts.
This is due to a client having issues with their infrastructure rather
than a problem with James...
And yes, I know fixing their name servers would solve the problem, but
sometimes life is not that easy.
R
I can't remember the outcome of a recent conversation about what happens
to V3
Will the current head become a branch?
Will the branch_2_1_fcs become the head?
I would assume that next release will be 2.3 and include the latest
Avalon as well.
I hope to complete the user attribute work in the next
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 November 2003 04:15
> To: James Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Future direction for James
>
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
> >>Personal filtering sh
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 November 2003 15:11
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Future direction for James
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Therefore I think that users should have a processing pipeline as
> > well. When LocalDelivery ru
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 November 2003 14:28
> To: 'James Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Future direction for James
>
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
> > When LocalDelivery runs it should not just bli
Whilst we are on the subject of the processors and processing mail...
This is a bit of a rant, but I do eventually get to the point.
I notice that quite a few people have used the idea of a spam catching
matcher/mailet combination.
This made me think about where and when to catch spam.
All the exa
Hi Zoe (if that's your name and not your project's :) If it is,
apologies)
The IMAP part of James is not in step with the current James code for
one important reason:
You cannot persist messages in an IMAP store. This is because the
current implmentation of IMAP takes messages (from SMTP) and store
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 October 2003 15:08
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Steve Brewin
>
>
> +1
>
> Danny Angus wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >> I nominate Steve Brewin as a James Committer. Steve contribut
+1
Jason Webb
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 October 2003 15:02
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Soren Hilmer for Committer
>
>
> +1
>
> Danny Angu
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 October 2003 11:14
> To: 'James Developers List'
> Subject: RE: MailetException vs MessagingException
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > You would also need to
> > add attributes to give more meaningful error messages
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 October 2003 10:43
> To: 'James Developers List'
> Subject: RE: MailetException vs MessagingException
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jason
>
> > In my way of thinking a MailetException ("there was a
> problem")would
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 October 2003 09:47
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: MailetException vs MessagingException
>
>
>
>
>
>
> OTOH I suspect we should consider implementing listeners to
> handle transient and asynch
Noel, don't you *ever* sleep? :)
I don't think there's much else that needs doing.
Thanks for doing such a great job as usual!
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 October 2003 09:24
> To: James-Dev Mailing List
> Subject: Any Outsta
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 September 2003 16:38
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: User Attributes
>
>
> Jason,
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
> > Steven Brewin wrote:
> > > Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 September 2003 11:24
> To: James Developers List (E-mail); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: User Attributes
>
>
> Jason Webb wrote:
> > However, I need to store attribute
After some careful thought and good look through Darrell's code I think
I have most of the pieces I need.
However, I need to store attributes on the user for IMAP to work
properly.
These are two lists:
1) The list of current folders
2) The list of subscribed folders
As there is no place to store
I hate to use discussion forum techniques on a mail list...
*bump* :)
I'm still not sure which IMAP implementation to use
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 September 2003 09:32
> To: 'James Developers List'
>
I'm slighty confused here.
Which is the correct IMAP proposal to use?
The IMAP one or IMAP2?
Both appear to be IMAP4v1 capable servers, but IMAP2 seems to be more
complete
Any ideas?
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 Sep
I've now had a look and the IMAP code written by Darrell (IMAP2 proposal)
and I think I can write a bridging class between ImapMailBox , ImapStore and
the current db: and file: repositories. It'll be fun (cough) but it should
allow the IMAP team to get started.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 September 2003 19:34
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: IMAP Development Pointers
>
>
> > In fact I was under the impression that INBOX is a reserved folder
> > name, that it should always be ther
x27;s likely to
happen is you get some (or all) of the messages twice. This is because
the POP handler deletes all the messages in a store in one go, rather
than a message at a time
>
> Ed
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fr
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 September 2003 23:54
> To: James Developers List
> Cc: Darrell DeBoer; Kris Bravo; Joe Cheng; Maxwell
> Grender-Jones; Nawwar Kasrawi; Christian Myrvold; Kenny
> Smith; Peter Svensson; Sascha Kulawik
> Su
4, 2003 11:20 AM
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: IMAP Development Pointers
>
>
> Jason,
>
> Some links you might find useful:
>
> http://javamaildir.sourceforge.net/
>
> http://bluezoo.org/knife/
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpathx/
>
t if you want
> to I am not going to stop you, hehe :-P. Just a note, there
> should probably be folder link files too, right?, if you want
> to be able to have shared message spaces. Do you think this
> is the way to go, also? I'm just tossing out ideas, and am
> op
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
