Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk --> AA--> SIP trunk call flow

I think if your softphone cant hear the aa when dialing it, you need to get that fixed. It "would" be so much easier if you put it behind a firewall you know. On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Ujjval Karihaloo wrote: > I will open another thread for inbound calling.. > > > > *From:* sipx-users-b

[sipx-users] Inbound call from ITSP to registered Extension - No AUdio

Call from ITSP --> SIPTrunk on SIPX--> Call to Registered Endpoint/extension(E) behind Firewall (F). Call is connected but no audio.. The 200OK from the endpoint has its Private IP in the 200OK SDP...so I see SIPX send RTP to Private IP E. Also the RTP coming from Public Ip F (the endpoint is

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk --> AA--> SIP trunk call flow

I will open another thread for inbound calling.. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Ujjval Karihaloo Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 7:54 PM To: Tony Graziano Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trun

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk --> AA--> SIP trunk call flow

Thx for confirming. Apparently my inbound calling from ITSP to sipX to Softphone registered with sipX is also no Audio...so I think if I can solve that I shud be able to resolve the AA call flow.. I will post details after troubleshooting some more. From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitde

Re: [sipx-users] call park pickup with bria

On 5/6/2010 6:49 PM, Norman Branitsky wrote: > On 10-05-06 6:29 PM, Nathan Nieblas wrote: >> >> Anything special with the Bria soft phone to get it to pick up parked >> calls? The error when dialing is "call cannot be established". I've >> tried with *4xxx and also created a dial plan that rewrite

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk --> AA--> SIP trunk call flow

Yes, this works for this site... ITSP1>AA>FWD through ITSP2 It just so happens they have two itsp's, one for inbound, the other for outbound, but it does work. On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Yes. I have a site that does this. Let me check how it is configured and > p

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk --> AA--> SIP trunk call flow

Yes. I have a site that does this. Let me check how it is configured and post back. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 4

Re: [sipx-users] Astra 6730i

Stiles I don't think too many folks on the list use the 6730i phone. I would try and look at the SIP messages going back and forth. You can use ngrep port 5060 on the sipXecs system host, then try to make a call and look at the messages. --martin > -Original Message- > From: sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] management gui according extension number

If user is member of superadmin group they see everything. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Con

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk --> AA--> SIP trunk call flow

Looks my call forward off of an Extension on SIPX to my cell phone is not working either... Any ideas befor eI start digging into traceswith sipX using so many internal ports (5090, 5080, 5090..15060)...the trace is complicated to debug From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailt

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk --> AA--> SIP trunk call flow

Hi All: Does anyone have this call flow working. Call from ITSP and Autoattendant hairpins the cal lback to ITSP..I get no audio either way... Seems like a common scenario Call Forward always should work the same way..I will verify that too... From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitd

Re: [sipx-users] management gui according extension number

I tried, it works, but it seems too wide open. The user can see everything. Is there any way only allow user manage himself ? Thanks, Sen -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: 2010年8月14日 7:53 To: he...@tcd.ie; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org

Re: [sipx-users] management gui according extension number

That is what it is designed for. You need to know your pin also. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpd

[sipx-users] management gui according extension number

Hi Guys, Can I use extension number to login GUI and manage my extension option ? For example I am on ext 200, can I login GUI as 200 and manage call forward, speed dial etc ? Thanks, Sen ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundr

[sipx-users] 4.2.0 broke cisco hold: Re: I broke hold on cisco (somehow)

I am calling this a sipx 4.2.0 bug. it worked in sipx 4.0.4. On 8/13/10 4:57 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: I swear, it used to work. I have not upgraded since. running 4.2.0, cisco FW 8-13, poly 650, 3.13c, poly 335, 3.2.1. I found an old thread:

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk Template missing

I got it, Thanks a mill. I need training :) -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: 2010年8月14日 6:44 To: he...@tcd.ie; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk Template missing You have to pic sbc route during creati

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk Template missing

You have to pic sbc route during creation... Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customer

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk Template missing

I build from source, (sipXconfig （4.3.0-018884 2010-08-07T) everything work s fine. When I create SIP TRUNK, I have no where to put credential info for sip trunk... -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On B

Re: [sipx-users] SIP Trunk Template missing

On 8/13/10 6:35 PM, Sen Heng wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I am using sipx 4.3. I try to create a SIP TRUNK but it seems the provider > template is missing...? > It was on sipx 4.2... > you pushed the buttons in the wrong order. and sipx 4.3 isn't released anyway. > Thanks, > Sen > >

[sipx-users] SIP Trunk Template missing

Hi Guys, I am using sipx 4.3. I try to create a SIP TRUNK but it seems the provider template is missing...? It was on sipx 4.2... Thanks, Sen ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/si

Re: [sipx-users] cheap SIP TRUNK

Can you indicate what type of numbers you want to originate with? US? UK? Etc? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.9

[sipx-users] cheap SIP TRUNK

Hi Guys, I would like to find a cheap SIP trunk to test with Sipx. Does anyone know which provider has best rate ? I am in Dublin Ireland at moment. Thanks, Sen ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfo

[sipx-users] use rfc 2543 paramater ignored on poly

poly 335: fw 3.2.1. on phone page, set 'use obsolete rfc 2543 [1]' param is in cfg file: grep 2543 *.cfg | less (one phone with, one phone without) 00048-sipx-sip.cfg: voIpProt.SIP.useRFC2543hold="0" 00045-sipx-sip.cfg: voIpProt.SIP.useRFC2543hold="1" from 5, call 8.

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrading from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1

I resend the mail, because I've replied to the wrong thread. Sorry!!! --- In the previous mail I was wrong... I've tried using stunnel 4.26, 4.28 and 4.33, but the CDR HA Tunnel never started. So now I'm wondering about what to do... Is the 4.2.1 release compatible with CentOS 5.2 or should I

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID settings ignored since upgrade to 4.2.1.

In the previous mail I was wrong... I've tried using stunnel 4.26, 4.28 and 4.33, but the CDR HA Tunnel never started. So now I'm wondering about what to do... Is the 4.2.1 release compatible with CentOS 5.2 or should I have to upgrade the OS to a more recent version? If so, which version? I've

Re: [sipx-users] I broke hold on cisco (somehow)

My understanding of this is that the cisco (despite claims to the contrary) are trying to do the c=0.0.0.0 hold, right? On 8/13/10 4:57 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: # rfc_2543 is OBSOLETE, c=0.0.0.0 hold is OBSOLETE, poly's use a=sendonly, rfc_3264 # supposedly, all cisco phones from fw 7-5 o

[sipx-users] I broke hold on cisco (somehow)

I swear, it used to work. I have not upgraded since. running 4.2.0, cisco FW 8-13, poly 650, 3.13c, poly 335, 3.2.1. I went back to DEFAULT phone groups on the cisco and poly. remote calls are fine, doesn't matter who puts who on hold. local holds seem broken now. if a cisco phone puts anot

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

Right - I did not read the sticky (hiding face in shame). It seems the solution would be to have a unified signup which makes you a part of both the forum and the mailing list. During the signup process one could opt-out of receiving email if they wished. They would still be singed up for the l

Re: [sipx-users] Comments and votes welcome, t.38 faxing support

Vote for it on the tracker if you have not already: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8645 From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tran, Ly V. Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 2:50 PM To: Tony Graziano Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoun

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

Stiles and Ly -- You both stumbled onto one of the problems with the forum in its current implementation. Forum users must be signed-up for the mailing list (with the same e-mail address they use for the forum) in order for their posts to get sent to the mailing list. The reason for this is t

[sipx-users] Astra 6730i

Sorry for the re-post, but I received no response from the web forum so I'm sending this to the mailing list in hopes of getting help. I'm new to SipX and have completed a fresh install of 4.2.1 from the CentOS/SipX iso. I've successfully setup a kphone soft phone - so far so good. I'm trying t

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

>>> Stiles Watson 08/13/10 3:35 PM >>> >>>I have no idea if the forum posts to the list, but I'm guessing it does not. The very top "sticky" in the forum which says "PLEASE READ" describes that if you want your forum post to be send to the mailing list, you need to be signed up with the mailin

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

One thought I have -- from the mailing list perspective -- is whether more digest options are available (to package all the messages daily, for example)? Also, is it possible to group all the messages in a digest by topic so that the conversation on that topic can be read linearly? The way mail

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

Forum users don't read the fine print, for postings in forum list subscription is required I think someone should help martin finish his total integration. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Teleph

Re: [sipx-users] Comments and votes welcome, t.38 faxing support

Faxing IN sipx is a total wish because it would eliminate our having to maintain separate systems. I would love to see this. Plus, this way, when I hire someone to do the integration work I need done, accounts will be in one place. Mike ___ sipx-user

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

> I'm not opposed to the forum, I just don't want the mailing list to go > away. Paul, don't get me wrong, I totally agree with you on this point. I dislike how much email I get from the mailing list and how difficult it is for ME to maintain notes on issues gone past but there is a better conne

Re: [sipx-users] Comments and votes welcome, t.38 faxing support

Vote me in for faxing in SipX. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:47 PM To: Michael Scheidell Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Comments and votes w

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

I agree with Stiles. When I first started with SipX, I was too looking for help on the forum, but never got any responses. I thought the project might be dead, until I too came to the conclusion that support mainly came from the list. So I signed up to it. If the two can be merged, it would be

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID settings ignored since upgrade to 4.2.1.

Sorry for the delay on answering this request...I get busy. I have attached the results. If you look at frame 6, you will see that the 'From' header and the PAI header are the same when I disable the default identity and fill in the information. Interesting result, when compared to frame 8 of th

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

A newbe's perspective. I'm new to SipX and to the mailing list (just signed up actually). I normally do not signup for mailing lists - I get enough email as is. I do however, have a problem that I need to solve. I first went to the forum, submitted my question and got no response. So I tinker

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

I disagree. I'm a general contractor, Mike. My day-in, day-out stuff is implementing the EPAs new Lead Safe law on my job sites, selling restoration services, renovating clients kitchens and bathrooms, making sure I'm in compliance with federal and local laws, managing accounting for my bus

Re: [sipx-users] Error 420 registering IP phone

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <50463> Message-ID: I disabled both QoS and the SPI Firewall (no ALG) and the problem remained, same error. After that I tried usi

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

I think thats because with a mailing list you have to see all the activity. With a forum, people tend to hunt and peck for what they want without having to read through post that don't relate to them. -M >>> "m...@grounded.net" 08/13/10 2:48 PM >>> BTW, there is one very important aspect abou

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID set by users is not showed in other side (sipxecs 4.2.1).

Same issue. I see the From header as user_caller...@sipx_ip_addr I want it to use user_called...@itsp Server Address... Can we do that ? -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Ali Nebi Sent: Friday

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

BTW, there is one very important aspect about a mailing list that isn't such a given in forums. There is a connection between members which seems to happen now and then which I don't see as often in forums. Maybe that's part of what the old school feeling is with lists. Anyhow, I'm outta here

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID settings ignored since upgrade to 4.2.1.

Sorry about that. Yes, the ITSP uses registration. Heather L. Sanders Linux Systems Administrator Saginaw Valley State University 7400 Bay Road 374 Wickes Hall University Center, MI 48710 Office: (989) 964-2156 Mobile: (989

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

> I don't see how if your searching a Forum locally  or searching the > just the specific site that contained mailing list or forum from > google where you are not going to get fairly close results.  You're > still searching the same exact content.  Most of the time within > forums you have to turn

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

++1 This list has been an exceptional tool for better understanding the platform. I too agree that the 'buzz' of the list has its ways of making the project feel alive. Philippe On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Flatfender wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Paul Herron > wrote: > > Whil

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID settings ignored since upgrade to 4.2.1.

This is what I think it should look like... 14:35:46.526192 00:0c:29:09:16:74 > 00:30:88:10:e5:cd, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1168: (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 1154) 69.34.33.146.5080 > 74.63.41.218.5060: [udp sum ok] SIP, length: 1126 INVITE

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

I think martins goal is ideal. Same information and you choose which way to participate. Maybe someone can ding him and see if he needs help with that? On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Flatfender wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Paul Herron > wrote: > > While I agree with everything Jo

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

>�On 8/13/2010 1:18 PM, Paul Herron wrote: >� �Scalix message content � � >�While I agree with everything Josh has written below, I’m loathe to let >�go of the mailing list. I fear/suspect that shifting to a “forum only” >�will lead to a decline in participation and or attrition. Seems the reason

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Paul Herron wrote: > While I agree with everything Josh has written below, I’m loathe to let go > of the mailing list. I fear/suspect that shifting to a “forum only” will > lead to a decline in participation and or attrition. > In my particular case, IT is just one

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

> Or just searching: dns site:sipfoundry.org  to get mailing list, wiki, jira > etc? Talk about adding complexity for most people though :) ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

I have found that I can get everything done I need with a dedicated gmail account, thunderbird, and a blackberry. I can have thread view when I want it, respond on the go, make sure to use plain text on the lists where I will get shot if I don't, add attachemnts when allowed and needed. etc.

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

> > Out of curiosity how is entering the following into google not > searchable enough? > > dns site:http:/list.sipfoundry.net/archive/sipx-users > > > To get posts with dns entries in it?  Again I'm not saying forums > don't offer additional features... :) > Or just searching: dns site:sipfoundr

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

> Out of curiosity how is entering the following into google not > searchable enough? Because it's google, which indexes everything so your results are everything. Much more useful to have powerful search tools in a good forum choice and bring up local results only. _

Re: [sipx-users] Error 420 registering IP phone

I think we are getting somewhere fast... (where i dont know). The phone is behind a nat somewhere right? In that case, does that phones firewall have a sip alg or stateful packet inspection turned on? If so, turn that off... it could be a proxy or alg trying to sit between the phone and the proxy

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID settings ignored since upgrade to 4.2.1.

PAI is a trust thing within sip. It cant get passed more than one level i think and some itsp's use it to perform a basic authentication of sorts. I feel it is somewhat open and useless, but that's my opinion. If you put {itsp-registration-...@${itsp-domain} in the default identity AND disable it,

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:59 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > Right now, I'm confused as to what's been going on with sipx or it's various > flavors and sites and wiki's. I've not been very active because things are > running well at the moment but I do stay on the list and look at everything > t

Re: [sipx-users] Error 420 registering IP phone

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <50443> Message-ID: Forgot to mention I changed the IP addresses and hostnames to invalid ones for security. Everything else is cor

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

While I agree with everything Josh has written below, I’m loathe to let go of the mailing list. I fear/suspect that shifting to a “forum only” will lead to a decline in participation and or attrition. In my particular case, IT is just one of the many hats I wear, if I have to proactively go t

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

I guess I just want too much. The volume of email was bearable when there was no more than ~20 messages a day. It's gotten to the point where it takes up a lot more of my time to sort through and respond to mailing lists posts (I want to contribute, I really do, but it's getting difficult). I

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID settings ignored since upgrade to 4.2.1.

The ITSP requires that we send ${itsp-registration-...@${itsp-domain} . I have attached the firewall pcap. If you look at frame 8 of this pcap, you will see that the from header contains exactly that. However, what is interesting...is that the PAI header contains my personalized callerid infor

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

Right now, I'm confused as to what's been going on with sipx or it's various flavors and sites and wiki's. I've not been very active because things are running well at the moment but I do stay on the list and look at everything that flows. I wish however that there was ONE main forum somewhere w

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) > wrote: >> This one works well >> http://community.zenoss.org/community/forums >> I'm trying to poke around and see if it shows what they are using. No luck >> so far. > > Ma

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

I recall there was an openid plugin that needed some work. The goal was to have a user pick forum or email or both, two way updates in either direction. Once I needed to find a nugget on information and sipfoundry was down... I did a simple search in my email (google apps) and found it, since I g

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: > This one works well > http://community.zenoss.org/community/forums > I'm trying to poke around and see if it shows what they are using. No luck > so far. Martin has plans for replacing www.sipfoundry.org currently using joo

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wrote: > I don't mind a forum as well, but I don't want to lose the ability to > interact by mailing list too. There are plenty of lists I interact with that > let email and forum integrate perfectly. I personally prefer email. I spend

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

This one works well http://community.zenoss.org/community/forums I'm trying to poke around and see if it shows what they are using. No luck so far. On 8/13/2010 12:26 PM, Matt White wrote: You mention other list that integrate mailing/forum well? Do you know what they are using? We should l

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

You mention other list that integrate mailing/forum well? Do you know what they are using? We should look at how others do it. http://www.nabble.com/ has a free mailing/forum but also requires the dual signup procedure as well. But the forums have a cleaner look. The SuSe forums use vBullet

Re: [sipx-users] Error 420 registering IP phone

That looks strange to me. 1. Is the server behind nat? 2. If so is the server behind nat option checked? 3. is nat traversal checked? 4. If you have a static ip address for your public ip address, is it entered under server nat? 5. have you properly filled out your local subnets from the defaults?

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wrote: > I don't mind a forum as well, but I don't want to lose the ability to > interact by mailing list too. There are plenty of lists I interact with that > let email and forum integrate perfectly. I personally prefer email. I spend

Re: [sipx-users] Error 420 registering IP phone

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <50431> Message-ID: Sorry for the delay. Before reading your reply I reinstalled the whole server but it didn't work. ./sipXprox

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

I think this is a snom oddity.We saw something along these lines last year with Polycom phones. IF IT WERE ME (and its not), I would remove MOH on the phones and enable it ONLY at the ITSP. This means internal calls would have no MOH, but external calls WOULD. If you try that on a couple of phones

Re: [sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

I don't mind a forum as well, but I don't want to lose the ability to interact by mailing list too. There are plenty of lists I interact with that let email and forum integrate perfectly. I personally prefer email. I spend as much time on a blackberry as I do on a computer. -Original Messag

[sipx-users] Mailing list or forum

I think it's time this was revisited. Now that sipX as a whole has gained traction and started attracting users the mailing lists have started to, in my opinion, get out of hand. I open my mail client this morning and was greeted by 60 new sipx-users mailing list messages. That's right 60. I c

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID settings ignored since upgrade to 4.2.1.

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Heather L. Sanders wrote: > I took your suggestion and ran a pcap at my firewall...I can see that my > callerid info is in the PAI header.  However, my ITSP requires that we use a > valid PAI, so sending anonymous is 'not an option' for us with this ITSP. it seem

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrading from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1

Ok, so I run the following commands on both servers (primary and redundant) # wget http://sipxecssw.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.0/CentOS/5/i386/RPM/stunnel-4.26-1.i386.rpm # rpm -e --nodeps stunnel # rpm -i stunnel-4.26-1.i386.rpm After that I've restarted both servers and the previous error message is

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrading from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Massimo Vignone wrote: > Updating  : stunnel   # [ 31/105] > copying default config file to /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf > > warning: user stunnel does not exist - using root > ... > > In /var/log/sipxpbx/update.err.log I've found the following me

Re: [sipx-users] gtalk sipx

No. FS has a way to do that with mod_jingle. It's been asked for and in the jira. http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-6283 Please vote for it so I am not alone. On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Sen Heng wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Has anyone done gta

[sipx-users] gtalk sipx

Hi, Has anyone done gtalk register to Sipx and the phone can call to gtalk ? Thanks, Sen ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrading from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1

These were his comments at one point: Seems that once I installed the stunnel included with the Avaya sipX 4.2 build everything started working. Perhaps we should use stunnel 4.26-1 instead of 4.28-1 because of the change that Raymond Dans stated happened in 4.28: "I've found that with vers

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrading from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1

where is josh... i recall he had issues with stunnel ealier on. josh... are you listening? On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Massimo Vignone < massimo.vign...@unimore.it> wrote: > On 08/13/2010 04:13 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > >> Did you compare the installed sipx packages with the ones in the r

Re: [sipx-users] anyone using a broadsoft call manager based itsp?

I got caught on that one as well. I would swear that the default setting for that changed from 4.0.4 to 4.2.x.I haven't confirmed that fact, but I had a similar issue on an update, and that fixed it. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.o

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrading from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1

On 08/13/2010 04:13 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Did you compare the installed sipx packages with the ones in the repo? > > it's possible something did not get updated... > It seems that all the packages are installed... Looking at /var/log/sipxpbx/update.output.log I've found the following messag

Re: [sipx-users] anyone using a broadsoft call manager based itsp?

dIAGNOSTICS>sbc sTATISTICS> [I aint working, register me] On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Jesse Reynolds wrote: > D'oh, fixed it by turning on 'Register on Initialization' under ITSP > Account in the Gateway. Pretty obvious in retrospect. I don't know why it > had been set up without this. >

Re: [sipx-users] anyone using a broadsoft call manager based itsp?

sounds like you need to call the provider and see what they show they are sending. On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Jesse Reynolds wrote: > Well this is interesting. The inbound call doesn't even make it to my > sipxecs server - just doing a tcpdump. Hrm. We have a pfsense firewall in > front b

Re: [sipx-users] anyone using a broadsoft call manager based itsp?

D'oh, fixed it by turning on 'Register on Initialization' under ITSP Account in the Gateway. Pretty obvious in retrospect. I don't know why it had been set up without this. Cheers and thanks. On 14/08/2010, at 12:17 AM, Jesse Reynolds wrote: > Well this is interesting. The inbound call doesn'

Re: [sipx-users] anyone using a broadsoft call manager based itsp?

Yes, I have a dial plan similar to the one you describe. Users are 1001 to 1099 in this case. On 13/08/2010, at 10:39 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > interesting. iv not has that problem. my only problem was the caller id on > outbound forwarded calls. > > you using a dial plan to transform e

Re: [sipx-users] anyone using a broadsoft call manager based itsp?

Well this is interesting. The inbound call doesn't even make it to my sipxecs server - just doing a tcpdump. Hrm. We have a pfsense firewall in front but even that is not seeing any sip invite coming in. (It is seeing the keepalive packets every 20 seconds or so from sipx:5080 to itsp:5060. O

[sipx-users] _very_ brief notes for running sipxecs on EC2

I've testing this using AMI id ami-f8b35e91. AMI is produced by RightScale, but does not have to be used by rightscale services. Notes about instructions: * change sipxecs with your hostname * change sipxecs.example.com with your FQDN -2) launch instance (see tips below on security group) -1

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrading from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1

Did you compare the installed sipx packages with the ones in the repo? it's possible something did not get updated... On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Massimo Vignone < massimo.vign...@unimore.it> wrote: > Just upgraded my two servers: I did it from the GUI (before I read your > mails) but it s

Re: [sipx-users] Caller ID settings ignored since upgrade to 4.2.1.

I took your suggestion and ran a pcap at my firewall...I can see that my callerid info is in the PAI header. However, my ITSP requires that we use a valid PAI, so sending anonymous is 'not an option' for us with this ITSP. I will call the ITSP and see what I can work out. Perhaps I should consid

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

Il mercoledì 11 agosto 2010 10:48:25 Claudio Succa ha scritto: > > PCMU,PCMA,G722 should be the list in your sipxbridge config. If it were > > me (and its not), I would match this on a phone as well. If it matter and > > your itsp supports it, make sure their codec list is similarly matched. > > Wi

[sipx-users] Upgrading from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1

Just upgraded my two servers: I did it from the GUI (before I read your mails) but it seems that everything it's ok... Well, I said "it seems". Now I've found that the CDR HA Tunnel service on the redundant server is not running, with the following error message: Standard error * 2010.08

Re: [sipx-users] GUI upgrade 4.2 -> 4.2.1 fails silently

That's good to know not to bother with the GUI updater. I've now got remote shell access, hoorah. So, currently /etc/yum.repos.d contains many CentOS sections, I assume I leave all those and just replace the [sipXecs-stable] section at the end of the file with the following (from http://down

Re: [sipx-users] GUI upgrade 4.2 -> 4.2.1 fails silently

no argument from me. too much that doesn't see unless it spans a shell in a browser and logs it for you automatically. The update from browser might have been better designed to act as a firmware update. grab the tgz (or whatever the entire package would have been), downloaded it, expanded it, rep

Re: [sipx-users] GUI upgrade 4.2 -> 4.2.1 fails silently

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > The gui doesn't give you the ability to deal with any errors that might come > up in connecting. It's nice to have, but I NEVER USE IT, as raw messages are > not visible. +1 I would recommend we remove the update feature until we can make it

Re: [sipx-users] GUI upgrade 4.2 -> 4.2.1 fails silently

Even though the gui has it, it can be problematic. Do yourself a favor and do it from an ssh client and log the console output (I always do on a production system) in the event there are any issues. The gui doesn't give you the ability to deal with any errors that might come up in connecting. It's

Re: [sipx-users] anyone using a broadsoft call manager based itsp?

you using E.164 ish? do you need to transform a +{country code}? can you dial the WHOLE NUMBER from a sipx extension? and watch it? (wireshark: tshark will decode sip live) On 8/13/10 8:41 AM, Jesse Reynolds wrote: Internode's Nodephone service uses Broadsoft, and I have a 4.0.4 system at

  1   2   >