won't need to
explicitly specify this parameter in your request.
On 19 September 2012 14:27, Spadez james_will...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it is possible to set up highlighting so it is on by
default, and doesnt need to add to the URL. For example:
http://localhost:8080/solr
Hi,
So I want to enable highlighting on my results. When I run the query like
this:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=bookhl=true
I don't get any highlighted results. I am assuming that more is needed to
actually enable highlighting. Commented out at the bottom of my
solrconfig.xml
So I want to enable highlighting on my results. When I run
the query like
this:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=bookhl=true
Try explicitly setting the field(s) that you want to highlight.
To enable highlighting your field must me stored=true
See : http://wiki.apache.org/solr
of highlightcomponent as title and body, the result of
bigram (CJKTokenizer) cannot be highlighted.
Regards,
Qiao HU
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 10:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting
I'm not quite sure I follow (and I know nothing about how the highlighter
works with Japanese).
But, you don't highlight fieldTypes, you highlight individual fields and it's
just a comma (or space) separated list. You can set these either on the URL or
in the solrconfig.xml file for your
Hi,
I am very new for Solr.
I am using edismax that combines two fieldTypes of CJKTokenizer and
GosenTokenizer to query for japanese text.
but do not how to set the hl.fl of highlightcomponent for the two fieldTypes
with the same contents.
Could you guys offer me some advice please?
-PDF-not-return-highlighting-snippet-tp3999647p4002587.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Lance Norskog
goks...@gmail.com
There is no copyField in the schema. You have to store the parsed
text in a field which is stored! Highlighting works on stored fields.
There is no text field in the schema. I don't know how the DIH
automatically creates it.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:10 PM, anarchos78
rigasathanasio
when i search with abc cde, solr will return result but highlighting
portion is as per below,
lst name=highlighting
lst name=1
/lst
/lst
and when i search with ABC cde it will have below response
lst name=highlighting
lst name=1
arr name=SearchField
str
... ... ABC cde .
/str
/arr
/lst
/Solr-search-Tika-extracted-text-from-PDF-not-return-highlighting-snippet-tp3999647p4002587.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Any help? Anyone?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-search-Tika-extracted-text-from-PDF-not-return-highlighting-snippet-tp3999647p4002513.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Greetings friends,
I have successfully indexed Pdf –using Tika- and pure text –fetched from
database- in one single collection. Now I am trying to implement
highlighting. When I querying Solr i placing in the url the following:
http://localhost:8090/solr/ktimatologio/select/?q=BlahBlah;
start
The out-of-the-box example for SolrCell/Tika redirects the Tika content to
the text field, which is not stored/highlighted, so the Tika content is
indexed but not retrievable/highligtable.
What field are you highlighting for your database text?
You should direct your Tika content to a stored
Amir yoni.a...@actimize.com:
Hello,
(sorry for the empty message earlier, that was by mistake)
I am experiencing a strange problem with highlighting. I have a simple
configuration roughly as follows:
str name=defTypeedismax/str
str name=qfall_text/str
...
str name
I have an autocomplete index that I return highlighting information for but
am getting an error with certain search strings and fields on Solr 3.5.
I’ve narrowed it down to a specific field matching with a specific search
string. And I’ve tried making a few different changes to the schema
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Justin Engelman jus...@smalldemons.com wrote:
I have an autocomplete index that I return highlighting information for but
am getting an error with certain search strings and fields on Solr 3.5.
try the 3.6 release:
* LUCENE-3642, SOLR-2891, LUCENE-3717: Fixed
xsl:variable name=cTitle select=arr[@name='title']/str/
xsl:variable name=cUrl select=str[@name='url']/
xsl:variable name=hContent
select=/response/lst[@name='highlighting']/lst[@name=$cUrl]/arr/str/
xsl:attribute name=hrefxsl:value-of
select=$cUrl
Looks like this issue has already been fixed, sorry for the static. I
will update and try again.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
I am executing a query on a multivalued text field that has the value
of ZtestForJamie. When I execute this query
Does anybody know of a way to detect when the highlight snippet begins
at the beginning of the field or ends at the end of the field using one
of the standard highlighters shipped w/Solr? We'd like to display
ellipses only when there is additional text surrounding the snippet in
the original
the same query, but the exact same
thing happened - the highlighting for a document is an empty document
(i.e. { } ) just like before.
Any other clues?
Thanks
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Asfand Qazi
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 12:32 PM
To: solr-user
be reindexed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Asfand Qazi
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 5:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cannot get highlighting to work
On 31/05/12 21:10, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Try a query that uses a term that doesn't split an alphanumeric term
terms. Thanks.
If the analyzer changes, the data must be reindexed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Asfand Qazi
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 5:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cannot get highlighting to work
On 31/05/12 21:10, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Try
Hello,
I am having problems doing highlighting a Solr 3.6 instance, while it
was working just fine before on our 1.4 instance.
The solrconfig.xml and schema.xml files are located here:
https://github.com/mpi2/mpi2_solr/blob/master/multicore/main/conf/schema.xml
(please note the incorrect
: Asfand Qazi
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 12:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Cannot get highlighting to work
Hello,
I am having problems doing highlighting a Solr 3.6 instance, while it
was working just fine before on our 1.4 instance.
The solrconfig.xml and schema.xml files
That worked!
Thanks!
I did str name=hl.simple.pre /str
str name=hl.simple.post /str
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Not-able-to-use-the-highlighting-feature-Want-to-return-snippets-of-text-Urgent-tp3985012p3985507.html
Sent from the Solr - User
text:abstracthl=truehl.fl=textf.text.hl.snippets=2f.text.hl.fragsize=200debugQuery=true
Three things to check:
1-) See your text field declared as suitable for highlighting.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase
2-) Increase hl.maxAnalyzedChars=Integer.MAX
3-) Increase
Take a look at the /browse request handler in the example solrconfig.xml
and compare how it does highlighting to what you are doing. There are a lot
of little details, so maybe even one might be missing.
Also, you can only highlight stored fields, so make sure that text is
stored. In the Solr
/str
str name =hl.fragmentsBuildercolored/str
str name=hl.phraseLimit1000/str
str name=hl.usePhraseHighlightertrue/str
str name=hl.highlightMultiTermtrue/str
str name =hl.useFastVectorHighlighertrue/str
I still don't see any highlighting. I've managed to get
=hl.usePhraseHighlightertrue/str
str name=hl.highlightMultiTermtrue/str
str name =hl.useFastVectorHighlighertrue/str
I still don't see any highlighting. I've managed to get snippets of text
but
the actual word is not highlighted. I don't know where I am going wrong?
--
View this message
float name=hl.regex.slop0.5/float
str name=hl.regex.pattern[-\w ,/\n\quot;apos;]{20,200}/str
/lst
/fragmenter
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Not-able-to-use-the-highlighting-feature-Want-to-return-snippets-of-text
Hi,
I believe, in your colored fragmentsBuilder definition, you have not
mentioned anything in your pre and post tags and that may be the reason
that you are getting snippets of text, without highlighting.
Please refer http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters and check
/Not-able-to-use-the-highlighting-feature-Want-to-return-snippets-of-text-tp3985012.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Also,
the response just returns
lst name=highlighting
lst name=DOC_N/
/lst
That is the name of the document.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Not-able-to-use-the-highlighting-feature-Want-to-return-snippets-of-text-Urgent-tp3985012p3985013.html
Sent
Read up on highlighting here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
And then look at solrconfig.xml for how it is used there.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: 12rad
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 8:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Not able to use
copyField is a literal operation that happens at index time -- but it
really has no bearing what so ever on highlighting done at query time.
there is no memory of what source fields any values came from, so it
doesn't affect things in any way.
You haven't provided any details about your
Hi Jack,
Thanks for your reply. I did not specify dismax when query with highlighting
enabled: q=text:G-Moneyhl=truehl.fl=*, that was the whole query string I
sent. What puzzled me is that the string field cr_firstname was copied
to text, but it was not highlighted. But if I use
q=cr_fristname:G
it is a value for a string field, and a literal match occurs in
the string field cr_fristname. I think that fully accounts for the
behavior you see.
You might consider having a cr_fristname_text field which is tokenized text
with a copyField from cr_fristname that fully supports highlighting of text
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Urgent-Highlighting-not-working-as-expected-tp3983755p3983907.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dear all,
I queried Solr (3.5) with this: q=text:G-Moneyhl=truehl.fl=*, where text
is a text field and all the other fields were copied to it. I got three
records returned, however, only one field (also text field) was
highlighted:
lst name=highlighting
lst name=cr_149107
arr name=cr_name
stremG
The highlighting will be based only on the fields in which matching
occurred. Are you using edismax and with multiple fields in qf, or the
traditional Solr (Lucene) query parser that only matches in the default
field or an explicit field?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 11:33 PM
Subject: highlighting unstored externally provided fields solr 1397
We have a need to do highlighting on an unstored field and to support this
are using an impl very close to that posted at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1397. Is there community
/ HBase -
http://sematext.com/spm
From: Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 11:33 PM
Subject: highlighting unstored externally provided fields solr 1397
We have a need to do
is this: When I search for any word with such a character
(e.g. Ärzte which becomes Arzte internally), highlighting doesn't
work, there are no strings returned. No error message is issued, no
exceptions occur, as far as I can tell.
If searching e.g. for ?rzte (without quotes), highlighting works fine
first follow solr tutorial to know more about it, how
query parser work, how to define your schema and then you may use highlight
in right way.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/searching-and-text-highlighting
(12/04/05 15:34), Thomas Werthmüller wrote:
Hi
I configured solr that also word parts are found. When is search Monday
or Mond the right document is found. This is done with the following
configuration in the schema.xml:filter
class=solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory minGramSize=3 maxGramSize=30/.
these terms or having something like snippet highlighting, I would
have been able to do this. But it seems this is not supported at all as
far as I know? I came upon following very old thread from 2009 when
looking for solution:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/200905.mbox
Hello,
I want to do highlighting by hand into my indexed document which can be
XML, HTML, PDF, SVG, CGM...
Given a search query I want to be able to extract all the terms occurring
in this query to be able to do custom highlighting on the results. The
returned terms should be coherent
I would first attempt to underline or assign another colour if the
scheme allows for it before increasing font size.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:50:15 -0700, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
wrote:
How do you highlight terms in languages without boldface or italic
modes? Maybe raise the text size a
Google and Baidu highlight chinese queries by making text red.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you highlight terms in languages without boldface or italic
modes? Maybe raise the text size a couple of sizes just for that word?
--
Lance Norskog
How do you highlight terms in languages without boldface or italic
modes? Maybe raise the text size a couple of sizes just for that word?
--
Lance Norskog
goks...@gmail.com
Or is it because query is on keyword field and I expect matching keywords
to be highlighted on excerpts field? Any insights would help a lot.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-text-field-when-query-is-for-string-field-tp3475334p3814159.html
with values as follows
arr name=clothingstrblack pants/strstrwhite shirt/str/arr
and I do a query against that field with highlighting enabled as follows
/select?hl.fl=clothingrows=5q=clothing:black
clothing:shirthl=onindent=true
I thought I would see the following in the highlights
arr name
/arr
and I do a query against that field with highlighting enabled as follows
/select?hl.fl=clothingrows=5q=clothing:black
clothing:shirthl=onindent=true
I thought I would see the following in the highlights
arr name=clothingstremblack/em pants/strstrwhite
emshirt/em/str/arr
but instead
If I have a multivalued field with values as follows
arr name=clothingstrblack pants/strstrwhite shirt/str/arr
and I do a query against that field with highlighting enabled as follows
/select?hl.fl=clothingrows=5q=clothing:black clothing:shirthl=onindent=true
I thought I would see
(12/02/22 7:53), Nitin Arora wrote:
Hi,
I'm using SOLR and Lucene in my application for search.
I'm facing an issue of highlighting using FastVectorHighlighter not working
when I use PayloadTermQueries as clauses of a BooleanQuery.
After Debugging I found that In DefaultSolrHighlighter.Java
Hi,
I'm using SOLR and Lucene in my application for search.
I'm facing an issue of highlighting using FastVectorHighlighter not working
when I use PayloadTermQueries as clauses of a BooleanQuery.
After Debugging I found that In DefaultSolrHighlighter.Java,
fvh.getFieldQuery does not return
Koji Sekiguchi wrote
(12/02/14 22:25), O. Klein wrote:
I have not been able to find any logic in the behavior of hl.q and how it
analyses the query. Could you explain how it is supposed to work?
Nothing special on hl.q. If you use hl.q, the value of it will be used for
highlighting
made new field content_hl to prevent problems coming from copyField.
When using hl.q=content_hl:(spell Check) I now get highlighting including
stopwords.
but when using hl.q=content_hl:(SC) where SC is synonym I get no
highlighting.
Can you verify if synonyms work when using hl.q?
--
View
and stemmed words)?
I made new field content_hl to prevent problems coming from copyField.
When using hl.q=content_hl:(spell Check) I now get highlighting including
stopwords.
but when using hl.q=content_hl:(SC) where SC is synonym I get no
highlighting.
Can you verify if synonyms work when
(12/02/14 22:25), O. Klein wrote:
I have not been able to find any logic in the behavior of hl.q and how it
analyses the query. Could you explain how it is supposed to work?
Nothing special on hl.q. If you use hl.q, the value of it will be used for
highlighting rather than the value of q
=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12871234
koji
--
Apache Solr Query Log Visualizer
http://soleami.com/
Well, If I understand it correctly, yes.
If this means that queries are analyzed like the field they are
highlighting. That would give the highlighter a lot more
to explain a bit more how hl.q is supposed to work and
with some examples?
Thanx.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3740114.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
for highlighting.
For example, if q is a boolean query of A AND B, you can expand it to
A AND B AND C or shrink it to A for hl.q.
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3740280.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
someone confirm whether this is a bug?
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3734892.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
(12/02/11 21:19), O. Klein wrote:
Koji Sekiguchi wrote
(12/01/24 9:31), O. Klein wrote:
Let's say I search for spellcheck solr on a website that only contains
info about Solr, so solr was added to the stopwords.txt. The query that
will be parsed then (dismax) will not contain the term solr.
hl.q works:)
But i have to attach the hl.q to my standard query.
In bigger queries it would by a pain to find out, which terms i need in my hl.q.
My plan: Own query parser in solr, which loops through q, identifies
filter terms(in my case language:de) and append
it as hl.q to the standard query.
Hi,
i have problems with edismax, filter queries and highlighting.
First of all: can edismax deal with filter queries?
My case:
Edismax is my default requestHandler.
My query in SolrAdminGUI: (roomba OR irobot) AND language:de
You can see, that my q is roomba OR irobot and my fq is
language:de
in calalina.out i can see the following query:
path=/select/
params={hl=trueversion=2.2indent=onrows=10start=0q=(roomba+OR+irobot)+AND+language:de}
hits=1 status=0 QTime=65
language:de is a filter, and shouldn't be highlighted.
Do i have a thinking error, or is my query wrong? Or is it
an
Hi Ahmet,
thanks for quick response :)
I've also discovered this failure.
I wonder that the query themselves works.
For example: query = language:de
I get results which only have language:de.
Also works the fq and i get only the de-result in my field language.
I can't understand the behavior. It
Seeing the results with debugQuery=on would help.
No, fq does NOT get translated into q params, it's a
completely separate mechanism so I'm not quite sure
what you're seeing.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Vadim Kisselmann
v.kisselm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Ahmet,
thanks for
Hi Erick,
thanks for your response:)
Here its my query:
(roomba OR irobot) AND language:de AND
url:http://www.blog-gedanken.de/produkte/erste-erfahrung-mit-unserem-roomba-roboter-staubsauger/;
Url and language are fields in my schema.xml
With hl=truehl.fl=text,url i see this, but i want only see
I didn't read your first post carefully enough, I was keying
on the words filter query. Your query does not have
any filter queries! I thought you were talking
about fq=language:de type clauses, which is what
I was responding to. Solr/Lucene have no way of
interpreting an extended q clause and
Hi Erick,
I didn't read your first post carefully enough, I was keying
on the words filter query. Your query does not have
any filter queries! I thought you were talking
about fq=language:de type clauses, which is what
I was responding to.
no problem, i understand:)
Solr/Lucene have no
Try the fq option maybe?
I thought so, unfortunately.
fq will be the only option. I should rebuild my
application :)
Could hl.q help? http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.q
Hmm, i don´t know, but i can test it tomorrow at work.
i´m not sure about the right syntax with hl.q. (?)
but i report :)
2012/1/31 Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com:
Try the fq option maybe?
I thought so, unfortunately.
fq will be the only option. I should rebuild my
application :)
Could
(12/02/01 4:28), Vadim Kisselmann wrote:
Hmm, i don´t know, but i can test it tomorrow at work.
i´m not sure about the right syntax with hl.q. (?)
but i report :)
hl.q can accept same syntax of q, including local params.
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(12/01/24 9:31), O. Klein wrote:
Let's say I search for spellcheck solr on a website that only contains
info about Solr, so solr was added to the stopwords.txt. The query that
will be parsed then (dismax) will not contain the term solr.
So fragments won't contain highlights of the term solr. So
Ah, I never used the hl.q
That did the trick. Thanx!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3684245.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Nitin and any others who may have followed this item,
I resolved the issue, but I'm not exactly sure of the originating cause.
I had change the field types of my text fields to text_en and then
re-indexed. Changing to text_en kept highlighting from happening to
more than one term in the fields
.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3681901.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
(12/01/23 23:14), O. Klein wrote:
Im using trunk and FVH and eventhough I filter stopwords when searching, I
would like to highlight stopwords in fragments. Using a different field
without the stopwords filter did not have the desired effect.
Please provide more info. In particular, how your
. the) and some need to be highlighted, but don't need to
affect the scoring of a document (e.g. solr) and others need to be
highlighted and affect scoring (e.g. spellcheck).
What are your thoughts on this?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords
Nitin (and any other interested parties here):
Unfortunately, re-indexing the content did not resolve the problem and the
symptom remains the same. Any additional advice is appreciated.
Tim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-more-than-1-term
=130 start=0 maxScore=2.263531
...
doc
float name=score2.0976832/float
arr name=TOC
str
Overview - Scheduling a Pickup, System Procedures
/str
/arr
str name=Title
Scheduling a Pickup
/str
/doc
...
/result
lst name=highlighting
lst name=...(The document's
Hi Tim,
Can you share the text_en type definition? Do check if your have Stemmer
configured in the type definition.
If not then that might be the reason of scheduled not matching with
scheduling.
Thanks
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting
Aro, thanks for your interest and response.
I'm using the stock definition in the supplied config.xml, as follows:
fieldType name=text_en class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory
Just to be clear, I do phrase query on string field like
q=keyword_text:smooth skin. I am expecting highlighting to be done on
excerpt field. What I see is:
lst name=highlighting
lst name=18602-1973/
lst name=18603-1973/
lst name=18604-1973/
/lst
These numbers are unique id's of documents. Where
Hi Erik.. Thanks for your reply.
And yes data was on index. but i found the problem , the problem was not of
PlainTextEntityProcessor. highlighting was returning in multivalued field
and in non-multivalued field there was less highlight. so i thought problem
may be in PlainTextEntityProcessor
, it returns me documents
with proper highlighting. After changing multi-valued to non-multivalued
field, on search i get less highlighting for few documents than older one.
e.g i search with search Term 'cat' ,
in old configuration i get one result as below
arr name
configuration was working fine , it returns me documents
with proper highlighting. After changing multi-valued to non-multivalued
field, on search i get less highlighting for few documents than older one.
e.g i search with search Term 'cat' ,
in old configuration i get one result as below
options that could be used related to
highlighting to mitigate these issues, i just couldn't remember what they
are (does the FastVectorHighlighter have these problems? is it only if you
use WeightedSpanTermExtractor?) and hence my suggestion to Michael to
start a thread here in the hopes
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/charFilter-PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory-and-highlighting-tp3629699p3631367.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Well I guess may be a bug somewhere
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2208
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/charFilter-PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory-and-highlighting-tp3629699p3631571.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
AND (( field_t:[* TO *] ))
Clearly, the default field (text_t) is not being searched by this query
and highlighting it would be semantically incongruent with the query.
Is it a bug?
Darren
On 01/02/2012 04:39 PM, Juan Grande wrote:
Hi Darren,
This is the expected behavior. Have you tried setting
=text_t} kind_s:doc AND (( field_t:[* TO *] ))
Clearly, the default field (text_t) is not being searched by this query
and highlighting it would be semantically incongruent with the query.
Is it a bug?
Darren
On 01/02/2012 04:39 PM, Juan Grande wrote:
Hi Darren,
This is the expected
-PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory-and-highlighting-tp3629699p3629699.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
to
highlighting to mitigate these issues, i just couldn't remember what they
are (does the FastVectorHighlighter have these problems? is it only if you
use WeightedSpanTermExtractor?) and hence my suggestion to Michael to
start a thread here in the hopes that the highlighting experts (Yeah Koji
, it may change content before highlight
processing occurs ?
Do you have any solutions, we really need charFilter feature ?
Thanks,
Jul
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/charFilter-PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory-and-highlighting-tp3629699p3629699.html
Sent
of
the [* TO *], but
the query semantics indicate not searching on text_t even though
highlighting is enabled.
Is this correct behavior? it produces unwanted highlight results.
I would expect Solr to know what fields are participating in the query
and only highlight
those that are involved in the result set
501 - 600 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo
