On 02/07/2018 08:48 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
> On 2/7/2018 at 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett created this epitome of digital
> genius:
>> My use of SeaMonkey dates from preferences evolved in Netscape days.
>> My brother (using Firefox on Windows 10) for browsing and gmail has
>> noticed recent problems.
On 2/7/2018 at 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett created this epitome of digital
genius:
My use of SeaMonkey dates from preferences evolved in Netscape days.
My brother (using Firefox on Windows 10) for browsing and gmail has
noticed recent problems. His problem description is anonymously viewing
to suspect a
cookie problem. However I've just read an unrelated thread that briefly
discussed OAuth 2.0 issues. I've just done a preliminary web search. A
Wikipedia article causes suspicion that it may be part of the problem as
some of its description jibes with some of the user group thread
Should be in 2.48. Works here in 2.49.1
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2017/01/webgl-2-lands-in-firefox/
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Will SeaMonkey be supporting WebGL 2.0 in the future like Firefox does?
Or is it just that the current release version of SeaMonkey is too old for
WebGL 2.0 and when
Will SeaMonkey be supporting WebGL 2.0 in the future like Firefox does?
Or is it just that the current release version of SeaMonkey is too old for
WebGL 2.0 and when the new one comes out WebGL 2.0 will be in there?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
The equivalent Firefox is Firefox 1.5 Deer Park
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_release_history#Release_history
Similarly:
SeaMonkey 1.1 is and Firefox 2.0 use Gecko 1.8.1.
The next bit is a bit tricky:
Firefox 3.0 uses Gecko 1.9.0
SeaMonkey 2.0 and Firefox 3.5 use Gecko 1.9.1
Firefox 3.6 uses
Dear,
I am pursuing my research in the field of sotware maintainence at
preventive level. i had published some of my research paper in ACM SIGSOFT
SEN. As per my research i designed the metrics model for smelly classes
with the help of firefox three versions and then i had validated or tested
the
Whenever I attempt upgrade from Seamonkey 1.1.8 to any version at 2.0,
or above, I am unable to do so. I'm using a Macintosh running OS X
10.6.8.
First I was told that I can't proceed because I have 2 versions of
SeaMonkey running (I don't).
I now see the following message: Your SeaMonkey
Don wrote:
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with
no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.
Many other problems. For one thing there is no
Don a écrit :
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with
no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.
Many other problems. For one thing there is no
Ray_Net wrote:
Don wrote:
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.
[...]
Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?
Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report a bug. (this version
Keith Whaley wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Don wrote:
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.
[...]
Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?
Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with
no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.
Many other problems. For one thing there is no documentation for
Don wrote:
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.
...
Don
Don your message here is a repeat of yesterdays, yesterdays (Aug 6) also
recieved many replies addressing your concerns, please do not double
post, and see those replies. From there we can move on with further
discussion if
Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward. It has many changes with
no real improvement. This new version makes some things take more
time, like simply saving a bookmark. Now there is no way to
designate a new bookmark folder.
Many other problems. For one thing there is no documentation for
Don schrieb:
Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?
There is no older version that still is supported.
Unsorted bookmarks are those you file quickly with the new bookmarks
icon at the right of the location bar.
Robert
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:26:48 -0500, Manuel Reimer wrote:
Hello,
for some reason a existing places.sqlite causes SM 2.2 to hang with 100%
CPU if opened with my old SM 2.0 profile. In SM 2.0 this file didn't
cause problems. I had to rename places.sqlite to start successfully into
SM 2.2
user@domain.invalid wrote:
Mac OS X 10.6.7
Seamonkey 2.0.14, problem first noticed under 2.0.13
My personal certificates and the CA certificates which
authenticate them have disappeared from Seamonkey.
This used to all work prior to 2.0.13 but not neither
my personal certificates nor the CA
Mac OS X 10.6.7
Seamonkey 2.0.14, problem first noticed under 2.0.13
My personal certificates and the CA certificates which
authenticate them have disappeared from Seamonkey.
This used to all work prior to 2.0.13 but not neither
my personal certificates nor the CA Authority ceriticates
shows up
?
Indeed the latest versions of the Firefox Sync add-on do not work
properly with SM 2.0 anymore. You'll either have to return to one of the
previous Firefox Sync versions (maybe 1.5.1) or wait for SM 2.1 which
will be released really soon now and includes Sync out of the box (which
also means
with Seamonkey?
Indeed the latest versions of the Firefox Sync add-on do not work
properly with SM 2.0 anymore. You'll either have to return to one of the
previous Firefox Sync versions (maybe 1.5.1) or wait for SM 2.1 which
will be released really soon now and includes Sync out of the box (which
The Firefox Sync extension used to work reasonably well, albeit with a
limited feature set, in Seamonkey. That was back in the day when it was
still called Weave, I think.
I have been letting it auto-update itself for some time... but recently
I noticed that it does not sync anymore. Worse: the
The 2.0.13 upgrade to SeaMonkey has apparrently destroyed
my personal certificates. Both the long term (1+ year)
and short term certificates no longer appear nor do their
CA certificates appear under the Authorites tab.
This was all working as of 2.0.12, does anyone else
see this? Have a
Frank J. Nagy wrote:
The 2.0.13 upgrade to SeaMonkey has apparrently destroyed
my personal certificates. Both the long term (1+ year)
and short term certificates no longer appear nor do their
CA certificates appear under the Authorites tab.
This was all working as of 2.0.12, does anyone else
see
The SeaMonkey project has branched off comm-central for our upcoming
SeaMonkey2.1 release today.
You can find the repository for SeaMonkey2.1 in
|http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-2.0| if you clone from there, then
you can simply |client.py checkout| from the repo root to get all the
other
DoctorBill a écrit :
Internet Explorer (Sorry Had to say those bad words !) has a feature
down on the lower right side wherein one can change the size of any
graphic shown on the screen.
Been using SM 1.1 and also have SM 2.0 on my desktop.
I finally remembered today to ask here if SM 1.1
Internet Explorer (Sorry Had to say those bad words !) has a feature
down on the lower right side wherein one can change the size of any
graphic shown on the screen.
Been using SM 1.1 and also have SM 2.0 on my desktop.
I finally remembered today to ask here if SM 1.1 and/or SM 2.0 has
On 4/15/11 5:09 PM, DoctorBill wrote:
Internet Explorer (Sorry Had to say those bad words !) has a feature
down on the lower right side wherein one can change the size of any
graphic shown on the screen.
Been using SM 1.1 and also have SM 2.0 on my desktop.
I finally remembered today
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/15/11 5:09 PM, DoctorBill wrote:
Internet Explorer (Sorry Had to say those bad words !) has a feature
down on the lower right side wherein one can change the size of any
graphic shown on the screen.
Been using SM 1.1 and also have SM 2.0 on my desktop.
I finally
Hi - hope this isn't dumb question time, but I'm stumped. When I delete items from my mail inbox,
some of them go into the trash folder, while others just disappear. All messages flagged as junk
are sent to trash, but deleted non-junk messages just vanish, it seems. This is occasionally
Hi,
Le 18/02/2011 13:35, Robert Kaiser a écrit:
If it already happened, you should be able to get back your bookmarks at
least by going into the bookmarks manager and restore older bookmarks
from the Tools menu. Or you can try renaming the places.sqlite-corrupt
(or similar) file back to
Hi,
I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch
Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks.
How fixing it?
Seamonkey 2.1b3pre mail window look very pretty!
--
Sorry for my bad english, the british dictionnary is disabled
Stéphane Grégoire schrieb:
I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch
Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks.
How fixing it?
Make a backup of your profile (which you should always do anyhow), and
esp. your places.sqlite
On 31/12/10 04:16, NoOp wrote:
[...]
OK, it was marked as RESOLVED as in:
This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 613199 ***
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613199
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product:SeaMonkey
Hence, it was technically marked as FIXED.
until they
try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no
longer are compatible.
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=46t=1248265
http://mozilla-xp.com/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/Please-help-testing-For-SeaMonkey-2.1-Alpha-1-candidates
The solution is mentioned
NoOp wrote:
Then you'd be seriously mistaken. Users have spent considerable time
effort integrating lightning calendars data into their systems. If you
think that there was backlash with SM 1.1.x and forms, wait until they
try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
Here is a paste of: https://help.ubuntu.com/community#Getting to
know and work with your system directly from 2.0.11. There are of
course more examples in the bug report, but that one works for me.
Which is in and of itself not
. It is NOT a New
feature.
There are thousands of 2.0.x SeaMonkey users (at least one would hope
so) out there that still have this issue. Marking the bug as 'FIXED' on
a yet to be released 2.1 trunk IMO simply doesn't cut it IMO.
If we expect users to install 2.1pre versions simply so that they can
copy paste
Hi,
WLS a tapoté, le 30/12/2010 01:43:
Lightning 1.1a1pre (32-bit) works just fine for me in SM 2.1b2pre
(32-bit) on openSUSE 11.3.
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/calendar/lightning/nightly/linux-xpi/
The link which is working with Seamonkey 2.1b2pre is
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:26:08 -0800, NoOp wrote:
I *highly* recommend that the Council sort out the issues (personal
and technical) with the SeaMonkey Lightning folks *before* any SM 2.1
Unfortunately there are no Lightning folks plural left. There is one
solitary volunteer who works on it in
NoOp schrieb:
Phillip Chee pointed out this in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15
quote
The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and
stability fixes are allowed.
/quote
If this is the case
NoOp schrieb:
There are thousands of 2.0.x SeaMonkey users (at least one would hope
so) out there that still have this issue. Marking the bug as 'FIXED' on
a yet to be released 2.1 trunk IMO simply doesn't cut it IMO.
FIXED always means fixed in the version set as target milestone
NoOp schrieb:
wait until they
try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no
longer are compatible.
Who says that they would not be compatible? From all I know, they are
perfectly compatible so far.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how
Robert Kaiser wrote:
That 2.0 profiles will just work in 2.1 - downgrading from 2.1 to 2.0
might even work, but might have some flaws which we only intend to fix
if it's easy (e.g. 2.1 bookmarks will never automatically work in 2.0).
So the downgrading to 2.0 is NOT possible - Great news
Ray_Net schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
That 2.0 profiles will just work in 2.1 - downgrading from 2.1 to 2.0
might even work, but might have some flaws which we only intend to fix
if it's easy (e.g. 2.1 bookmarks will never automatically work in 2.0).
So the downgrading to 2.0
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:58:14 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
wait until they
try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no
longer are compatible.
Who says that they would not be compatible? From all I know, they are
perfectly compatible so far
On 12/30/2010 4:15 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
Here is a paste of: https://help.ubuntu.com/community#Getting to
know and work with your system directly from 2.0.11. There are of
course more examples in the bug report, but that
Philip Chee schrieb:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:58:14 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
wait until they
try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no
longer are compatible.
Who says that they would not be compatible? From all I know, they are
perfectly
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/30/2010 4:15 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
Here is a paste of: https://help.ubuntu.com/community#Getting to
know and work with your system directly from 2.0.11. There are of
course more
On 12/29/2010 08:22 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/29/2010 04:15 AM, Neil wrote:
NoOp wrote:
As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some
users to go from SM 1.x to 2.0. If 2.0 is now maintenance only
mode, then I wonder
On 12/30/2010 02:47 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/30/2010 4:15 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
Here is a paste of: https://help.ubuntu.com/community#Getting to
know and work with your system directly from 2.0.11. There are
On 12/30/2010 10:16 PM, NoOp wrote:
Really? Why don't you switch to SM 2.0.11 instead of Thunderbird 3.1.7
and try it?
Because I was, (and *am* in the middle of a compile cycle right now). I
use Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and Firefox regularly.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
On 12/30/2010 10:18 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/30/2010 02:47 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/30/2010 4:15 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
Here is a paste of:https://help.ubuntu.com/community#Getting to
know and work with your
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:51:02 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip Chee schrieb:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:58:14 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
wait until they
try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no
longer are compatible.
Who says that they would
NoOp wrote:
As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some users to go from SM 1.x to
2.0. If 2.0 is now maintenance only mode, then I wonder if it is worth
continuing with SeaMonkey further.
I think you have misunderstood the point of maintenance. New features
are always
Neil wrote:
NoOp wrote:
As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some users
to go from SM 1.x to 2.0. If 2.0 is now maintenance only mode, then
I wonder if it is worth continuing with SeaMonkey further.
I think you have misunderstood the point of maintenance. New features
NoOp escribió:
Phillip Chee pointed out this in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15
quote
The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and
stability fixes are allowed.
/quote
If this is the case
Ricardo Palomares Martínez wrote:
NoOp escribió:
Phillip Chee pointed out this in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15
quote
The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and
stability fixes are allowed
On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martínez wrote:
- will provisions be made for importing/exporting lightning calendars?
That's my biggest concern, too.:-)
Lightning is an extension, one which does not directly provide support
for SeaMonkey, and is also [last I knew] currently
On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martínez wrote:
As a 'User' of SeaMonkey (in both personal and production environments),
I'd appreciate an official comment from the SeaMonkey devs/project
management as to whether SeaMonkey 2.0 is in maintenance mode and if
Only security
On 12/29/2010 04:15 AM, Neil wrote:
NoOp wrote:
As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some
users to go from SM 1.x to 2.0. If 2.0 is now maintenance only
mode, then I wonder if it is worth continuing with SeaMonkey
further.
I think you have misunderstood the point
and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no
longer are compatible.
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=46t=1248265
http://mozilla-xp.com/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/Please-help-testing-For-SeaMonkey-2.1-Alpha-1-candidates
I *highly* recommend that the Council sort out
On 12/29/2010 10:26 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/29/2010 06:33 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martínez wrote:
- will provisions be made for importing/exporting lightning calendars?
That's my biggest concern, too.:-)
Lightning is an extension, one which
On 12/29/2010 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/29/2010 04:15 AM, Neil wrote:
NoOp wrote:
As you all know, it was a pretty difficult transition for some
users to go from SM 1.x to 2.0. If 2.0 is now maintenance only
mode, then I wonder if it is worth continuing with SeaMonkey
further.
I think
Phillip Chee pointed out this in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15
quote
The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and
stability fixes are allowed.
/quote
If this is the case, then shouldn't standard
NoOp wrote:
Phillip Chee pointed out this in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531210#c15
quote
The SeaMonkey 2.0.x branch is in maintenance mode. Only security and
stability fixes are allowed.
/quote
If this is the case
is probably a bit imprecise then. You need a browser that
supports OpenSearch. SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't, SeaMonkey 2.1 will.
HTH
Jens
Yes it does, thank you.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org
I am trying to add AOL Search to SeaMonkey. When I go to the web site
to install it:
https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/downloads/latest/7098/addon-7098-latest.xml?src=search
A popup appears telling me that I need a Mozilla-based browser.
Last I checked, SeaMonkey -was- Mozilla-based...
imprecise then. You need a browser that
supports OpenSearch. SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't, SeaMonkey 2.1 will.
HTH
Jens
--
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey
Are instructions posted anywhere on how to import passwords from Seamonkey 1.18
on an old PC (Win XP) to Seamonkey 2.0 on a new PC (Win 7) with an entirely new
profile?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
Bill Spikowski wrote:
Are instructions posted anywhere on how to import passwords from
Seamonkey 1.18 on an old PC (Win XP) to Seamonkey 2.0 on a new PC (Win
7) with an entirely new profile?
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40t=1978391
describes two possible approaches. I haven't
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Bill Spikowski wrote:
Are instructions posted anywhere on how to import passwords from
Seamonkey 1.18 on an old PC (Win XP) to Seamonkey 2.0 on a new PC (Win
7) with an entirely new profile?
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40t=1978391
describes two possible
SeaMonkey 1.1.x used to automatically add a toolbar when an HTML document
contained links such as the following:
link rel=prev href=box.html
link rel=next href=visudet.html
link rel=index href=indexlist.html title=index
link rel=first href=cover.html
My SeaMonkey 2.0 doesn't do
Daniel Barclay wrote:
SeaMonkey 1.1.x used to automatically add a toolbar when an HTML document
contained links such as the following:
link rel=prev href=box.html
link rel=next href=visudet.html
link rel=index href=indexlist.html title=index
link rel=first href=cover.html
My SeaMonkey 2.0
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
Daniel Barclay wrote:
SeaMonkey 1.1.x used to automatically add a toolbar when an HTML document
contained links such as the following:
link rel=prev href=box.html
...
What's the name of that toolbar?
Does SeaMonkey 2.0 still provide it?
...
Possibly: View
Lucas Levrel schrieb:
Le 27 juillet 2010, P.N. a écrit :
When looking at www.esprit.de, the detail views are shown differently
on windows (shown correctly) and linux (the big photo is shown
overlayed by the small ones at the frame's left side). Using Gentoo
Linux.
I don't understand what are
Le 27 juillet 2010, P.N. a écrit :
When looking at www.esprit.de, the detail views are shown differently on
windows (shown correctly) and linux (the big photo is shown overlayed by the
small ones at the frame's left side). Using Gentoo Linux.
I don't understand what are the detail views
Hello!
When looking at www.esprit.de, the detail views are shown differently on
windows (shown correctly) and linux (the big photo is shown overlayed by
the small ones at the frame's left side). Using Gentoo Linux.
Kind regards
Peter
___
Hi,
Where can I read an explanation on how customise by myself Seamonkey by
CSS, I have customised the browser for my netBook (the fonts were too
big) but I didn't found explanations for the mail tabs.
I opened some xpi themes for inspiration but it's too obscure for me and
I have already
, and customizing. Now
mnenhy will not install since it is not compatible with 2.x versions of
seamonkey. Now I'm missing my rot13-function.
Mnenhy now works with Seamonkey 2.0.*
http://mnenhy.mozdev.org/
Copy and FU2 mozilla.support.seamonkey
--
Stéphane
http://pasdenom.info/fortune
art ha scritto:
On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote:
When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+.
Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can
it be removed?
OS is Tiger 10.4.11
I experience the same on 10.4.11 with most keyboard commands such as
cmd/C, cmd/X, cmd/V, cmd
On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote:
When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+.
Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can
it be removed?
OS is Tiger 10.4.11
I experience the same on 10.4.11 with most keyboard commands such as
cmd/C, cmd/X, cmd/V, cmd/shift/C (mark all
Art:
Thanks!
I'd use the 'mute' button but times I have streaming audio as I use SM.
Reed
art wrote:
On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote:
When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+.
Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can
it be removed?
OS is Tiger 10.4.11
Art:
Attempted the fix.
Did not work on this end.
Yes, versions of SM below 2.0 worked fine.
This toning issue I have experienced in Thunderbird, Postbox etc all
Mozilla based.
Reed
art wrote:
On 4/21/10 8:02 AM, Reed wrote:
When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+.
Now when I
it.
Not sure if this fix will always stick between subsequent launches of
SM , logouts or OSX reboots.
Art
On 4/23/10 9:00 AM, Reed wrote:
Art:
Attempted the fix.
Did not work on this end.
Yes, versions of SM below 2.0 worked fine.
This toning issue I have experienced in Thunderbird, Postbox
launches of
SM , logouts or OSX reboots.
Art
On 4/23/10 9:00 AM, Reed wrote:
Art:
Attempted the fix.
Did not work on this end.
Yes, versions of SM below 2.0 worked fine.
This toning issue I have experienced in Thunderbird, Postbox etc all
Mozilla based.
Reed
art wrote:
On 4/21
When upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.0+.
Now when I keystroke Cmd-P for printing I hear a tone. This featur can
it be removed?
OS is Tiger 10.4.11
Reed
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
I've got one computer that preserves the way I want the mail storage
directory structure to display at start-up. On another computer it
collapses to Local Folders at every start-up and expands to show
everything instead of the way it was last left. I've gone through the
config file and the
John:
I've got one computer that preserves the way I want the mail storage
directory structure to display at start-up. On another computer it
collapses to Local Folders at every start-up and expands to show
everything instead of the way it was last left. I've gone through the
config file and
Hartmut Figge:
user_pref(news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane, true)
CP error. There should be a semicolon at the end. ;)
user_pref(news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane, true);
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Hartmut Figge wrote:
John:
I've got one computer that preserves the way I want the mail storage
directory structure to display at start-up. On another computer it
collapses to Local Folders at every start-up and expands to show
everything instead of the way it was last left. I've gone
Steven Holt wrote:
I've updated from 2.0 to v. 2.03 and still the browser immediately blows
up the whole program every time it is invoked. The browser window tries
to open and before anything fills into the all white browser window,
seamonkey dies and goes to an error reporting message box
On 3/11/2010 6:46 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Steven Holt wrote:
I've updated from 2.0 to v. 2.03 and still the browser immediately blows
up the whole program every time it is invoked. The browser window tries
to open and before anything fills into the all white browser window,
seamonkey dies
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2010 6:46 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Steven Holt wrote:
I've updated from 2.0 to v. 2.03 and still the browser immediately blows
up the whole program every time it is invoked. The browser window tries
to open and before anything fills into the all white browser window
On 3/11/2010 11:12 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
Why not just create a new profile and test using that?
Normally you would, but he indicated as soon as you got to the browser
SM dies (crashes) and if he should have set to open on web page rather
than than mail news. what
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2010 11:12 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
Why not just create a new profile and test using that?
Normally you would, but he indicated as soon as you got to the browser
SM dies (crashes) and if he should have set to open on web page rather
than than
On 3/11/2010 6:30 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2010 11:12 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
Why not just create a new profile and test using that?
Normally you would, but he indicated as soon as you got to the browser
SM dies (crashes) and if he should have
I've updated from 2.0 to v. 2.03 and still the browser immediately blows
up the whole program every time it is invoked. The browser window tries
to open and before anything fills into the all white browser window,
seamonkey dies and goes to an error reporting message box. I've asked
for help
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Why do I get an empty chatzilla after migrate? No preference, no
scripts, empty virgin CZ like I downloaded it from the website.
It's bad enough that users have to migrate every profile totally
manually if they have more than one, but the CZ didn't
version would not install in SM
2.x.
Just use Lightning 1.0 Beta 1 from addons.mozilla.org as that one works
fine with all SeaMonkey 2.0.x versions.
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
1 - 100 of 1713 matches
Mail list logo
