Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Bush wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs

Re: SOLVED: Composing in HTML For a Single Message -- 2.0

Bill Davidsen wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: The procedure for composing in HTML for a single message (as opposed to all messages) appears to have changed from 1.1.x. However, the 2.0 Help file still refers to 1.1.x procedures as follows: "If while composing a message you rea

Re: can no longer post in newsgroups

Keith Whaley wrote: Daniel wrote: Alex Strickland wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Rainer Bielefeld: When I tried to post a saved newsgroup post that was in drafts, I got a message: "This account only supports e-mail recipients. Continuing will ignore newsgroups" I wonder if this may

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

JAS wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that

Re: SeaMonkey 1.8 look on SM 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: S. Beaulieu wrote: Claude Duvergier wrote: I think he wants the opposite : "SeaMonkey Default Theme" SeaMonkey 2.0 is now natively using "SeaMonkey Modern" Not on my system. It automatically picked the default theme (which would be expected) and I had to revert to Mod

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Hartmut Figge wrote: Phillip Jones: Leonidas Jones wrote: What is this screenshot supposed to show? I see a Mail/News window with no tabs open. How does it relate to the problem of not wanting tabs in Mail/News? I've Drawn an arrow to point out the tab. I don't read here

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: Lou wrote: George Carden wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/15/2009 8:24 AM, Bush wrote: /snip/ He's probably talking about the new tabs within the e-mail reader. I don't care for them either. Can anyone point out to me the advantage of tabs in an e-mail reader? And...th

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: /snip/ Lee I see a Tab Bar above the message , So why is

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Phillip Jones: Leonidas Jones wrote: What is this screenshot supposed to show? I see a Mail/News window with no tabs open. How does it relate to the problem of not wanting tabs in Mail/News? I've Drawn an arrow to point out the tab

Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0

Bill Davidsen wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of

Re: SeaMonkey 1.8 look on SM 2.0

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: S. Beaulieu wrote: Claude Duvergier wrote: /snip/ I wish Pat would respond to my question in the projectit forum about the conflict with SkyPilot and QuoteColors extension I've emailed and put a post on there forum at

Re: SOLVED: Composing in HTML For a Single Message -- 2.0

Bill Davidsen wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: The procedure for composing in HTML for a single message (as opposed to all messages) appears to have changed from 1.1.x. However, the 2.0 Help file still refers to 1.1.x procedures as

Re: Restore the old Form Manager!

Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote: Restore the old Form Manager! ...please... We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday.

Re: Walnut theme

chicagofan wrote: JAS wrote: > Alfred Kaiser sent me an email and has posted an experimental Walnut theme, I am using it now, he wishes people to use it and his others and write reviews on them. Get it here : at addons.mozilla https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/50034 It is easy o

Re: Eliminating long "To:" lists when printing

Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste You can choose to for

Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...

Daniel wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: NoOp wrote: My apologies; I've also been informed by jens that the bug is related to where the file has been downloaded *locally*. Sorry, never paid much attention to that "feature" as I set downloads to go to only one folder & can find the file by a search i

Re: Eliminating long "To:" lists when printing

Mr. Cheese wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the

Re: ID & Passwords

JohnW-Mpls wrote: For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the password. SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID and password got pasted in when arriving at a controlled site. Is that an SM 2 failin

Re: ID & Passwords

BeeNeR wrote: On or about 11/19/2009 8:23 PM, Phillip Jones typed the following: JohnW-Mpls wrote: For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the password. SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID

Re: Multiple user/passwords

John Boyle wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: BeeNeR wrote: On or about 11/11/2009 9:57 PM, Hartmut Figge typed the following: BeeNeR: Neither yours or George Carden's solution works for me. The page I use multiple log-ins on is http://www.mail.com/ I have a couple of e-mail addresses that

Re: Eliminating long "To:" lists when printing

jean-francois.per...@laposte.net wrote: Mr. Cheese a écrit : Rick Merrill wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often

Re: Eliminating long "To:" lists when printing

Bill Davidsen wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer

Re: Newsgroup 2 copies

Bush wrote: Cedar wrote: Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup? Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes Checked . Seriously I do not have an Answer for you I am seeing that the last couple of days as well. Years ago I had that p

Re: Problems with SeaMonkey 2.0

Paul wrote: Campy wrote: I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the upgrade to Windows 7. The problems: 1. I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not connect or something simila

Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

art wrote: On 11/21/09 5:02 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:37:11 -0500, /art/: When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the "/" character as a word break delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient m

Re: Website problems

NoOp wrote: On 11/20/2009 11:34 PM, Cedar wrote: When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the following error message: XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected:. Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/ Line Number 36, Column 449:

click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic but is no highlighted an no message shows up. IN SM1.x click next would actually switch y

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic but is no highlighted an no message shows up

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic but is no highlighted

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out

Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0

John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - "Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provi

Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0

MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - "Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey wil

Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0

Mark Hansen wrote: On 11/23/2009 10:28 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: One thing that makes you like SM the best, is that when you click a Mailto: It doesn't open a Blank web page in FireFox and open a Blank email window with no address. In SM it simply switches email and the address is ready.

Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0

Steve B. wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Why not use the W3C validator at? The SeaMonkey accessory (plug-in?? is much more convenient since it gives me validation of any page it opens. Steve Don't have this for Mac OSX -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed

Re: 2.0 is buggy as hell and I'm not going to use it anymore

jim wrote: On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:29:08 -0800 (PST), Jim in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: I'm extremely disappointed in Seamonkey 2.0. The mail program bugs are too severe to warrant continued use. ... Until the major bugs are fixed, I'll stick with version 1.18. I agree. jim One bug t

can't resend a message in newsgroup.

on a rare occasion I have the need/desire send a message created ina newsgroup over again. Years ago I was able to do so, I noticed in SM1.1.8 and lower and SM 2 I can 't do this whether its saved in sent directory either in email Directory or the Local Directory. It didn't use to make any an

Re: Didn't news.mozilla.org used to have a secured port?

Ant wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: IIRC, it was port 563 SSL. Or is that no longer there for news.mozilla.org? Thank you in advance. :) I think you are thinking of the old support location secnews.netscape.com That server is still there, with its groups, by the way, Ah that was it. How come Mo

Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work

Bush wrote: A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ This is what I see on SM2 Mac: Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a000d' Type mismatch: 'CDbl' /Frameworks\Classes\Browser.cls, line 134 -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Bre

Re: Can't log into MyCokeRewards.com with SeaMonkey v2.0, but can with v1.1.18 and Firefox v2.0.0.20?

Ant wrote: Hello! http://www.mycokerewards.com/home.do doesn't seem to let me log in with SeaMonkey v2.0, but will for old v1.1.18 and Firefox v2.0.0.20. I already tried allowing referrers and changing User Agent to Firefox v2.0.0.20 Linux. Any ideas? Thank you in advance. :) I tried with 2.0

Re: Didn't news.mozilla.org used to have a secured port?

Jay Garcia wrote: On 26.11.2009 19:44, Ant wrote: --- Original Message --- Leonidas Jones wrote: IIRC, it was port 563 SSL. Or is that no longer there for news.mozilla.org? Thank you in advance. :) I think you are thinking of the old support location secnews.netscape.com That server

Re: Sending e-mail later in outbox in SM2.0...

Daniel wrote: Ant wrote: Hi! Does outbox always go in "Local Folders"? I use various e-mail accounts and servers. I'd like to have it each account use their own outbox that I send later. They all ended up in Local Folder's outbox. There are no outbox settings I see in preferences and accounts t

Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work

Bush wrote: JAS wrote: Bush wrote: A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I am using Windows and XP PRO and SM2 and have browsed around the site with no problem. JAS Win 7 Win 7 pro and seamonkey 2.0 and the site doesnot Work... I was able to vi

Re: donotcall.gov

Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Cannot view Donotcall.gov because of the following . And there are other sites that give me the same error What is causing this Seamonkey 2.0 or Win 7 pro _ donotcall.gov uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because t

Re: Coral IETab is dead on the vine

Rickles wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: Damn it. Just saw the posting on the website: http://coralietab.mozdev.org/index.html I've got the experimental version installed and it works for the most part, but there are some bugs that'll probably never be fixed now. What's the deal with the NPAPI plug i

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - A Mac User's Observations

Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:00:23 -0700, Rufus wrote: 5) If I customize the Toolbar for Mail and Newsgroups by adding the Delete button, the button is hidden upon exit from Customize - again, this is only true when using the default theme. If you sel

Re: SeaMonkey v2 extension replacements

Leonidas Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: John Boyle wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: Sqwertz wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:11:15 -0800, Ant wrote: /snip/ To whom it may concern: I am wondering whatever happened to the calendar that was supposed to be either an extension or an

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

Ray_Net wrote: Bush wrote: Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey 2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA Time for me to go back to 1.1.18 The best attitude you can do is to avoid trying to use a new version/design ... too earli

Re: Fedex Page does not load

Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi: When trying to track a fedex shipment at: http://www.fedex.com/us/ a text only menu loads, and at the bottom of the window appears: Read images.fedex.com, the icon in the upper right shows motion but the page does not load. How to fix that? Have Fun, Brooke Clarke C

Re: Fedex Page does not load

Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi David: Clearning the cache did not make any difference. Note that I just make a new profile, which allowed the browser to work. I can see images on other web pages, but not on the Fedex page. Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com go back to original and see if

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Problem is they drop support and updates on 1.1.8 as soon as 2 went gold. so if there are any security problems, it won't be updated. Please spell the version number correctly. It's "1.1.18", the 18th security and stability upda

Re: Inbox oddities...

Daniel wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: I'm working with Mac OS 10.6.2, and SM 1.1.18. In the last several days, my _Inbox_ shows message count discrepancies with what the upper left folder window indicates (say 15 messages unread, and 2484 total messages) and what actually shows up in the main messa

Re: Sending e-mail later in outbox in SM2.0...

Ant wrote: On 12/1/2009 2:40 AM PT, Daniel typed: Sorry, Martin, where do you get outbox from??? Is this something new for version 2.0?? It doesn't appear, natively, in my SM 1.1.15 (and older) profile!! When you use "Send Later", where does it go? Drafts. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If

Re: Sending e-mail later in outbox in SM2.0...

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ant wrote: On 12/1/2009 2:40 AM PT, Daniel typed: Sorry, Martin, where do you get outbox from??? Is this something new for version 2.0?? It doesn't appear, natively, in my SM 1.1.15 (and older) profile!! When you use "Send Later"

Re: Sending e-mail later in outbox in SM2.0...

Martin Freitag wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Phillip Jones wrote: Ant wrote: On 12/1/2009 2:40 AM PT, Daniel typed: Sorry, Martin, where do you get outbox from??? Is this something new for version 2.0?? It doesn't appear, natively, in my SM 1.1.15 (and older) profile!! When yo

Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0

David Wilkinson wrote: Bush wrote: It is not that she is using SeaMonkey 1.1.14, but rather that the user agent string is apparently not spoofing FireFox (unlike yours, which does). Please follow what I said ... We both Can see what the other is seeing on those web sites ... They say her

Re: Collapsing threads

Daniel wrote: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-" should be the answer but nothing happens. Tapping the "/"

Re: 2.0 ?

question wrote: Is 2.0 a beta ? At this point official no. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it" http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support

Re: Collapsing threads

Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Daniel wrote: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the &qu

Re: Sniffing and Spoofing

David E. Ross wrote: Two recent threads in mozilla.support.seamonkey on this issue resulted in very lengthy discussions. See "SeaMonkey and U.S. Government site does not work" at and "Web site work in IE but not in SeaMon

Re: 2.0 ?

M van Ketel wrote: John Boyle wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: question wrote: Is 2.0 a beta ? At this point official no. To the newsgroup: But from a USERS standpoint, a definite "YES"! :-( Only to a minority groups point of view I think. Mark (no real problems with SM 2 so far)

Re: Collapsing threads

Daniel wrote: Daniel wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Daniel schrieb: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-"

Re: Sniffing and Spoofing

David E. Ross wrote: On 12/2/2009 5:09 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: I previously wrote [in part]: Two recent threads in mozilla.support.seamonkey on this issue resulted in very lengthy discussions. See "SeaMonkey and U.S. Government site does not work" at <news://news.mozil

Re: Sniffing and Spoofing

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Two recent threads in mozilla.support.seamonkey on this issue resulted in very lengthy discussions. See "SeaMonkey and U.S. Government site does not work" at <news://news.mozilla.org:119/so-dntlowokak43w

Re: Sniffing and Spoofing

Leonidas Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/2/2009 5:09 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: I previously wrote [in part]: /snip/ I can't see the individual listing's either using a Mac and SM 1.1.18...but I have a question - do you have to log into the TV Guide site in or

Re: Sniffing and Spoofing

Arnie Goetchius wrote: David E. Ross wrote: 5. Management at both the Mozilla Foundation and the Mozilla Corporation should make similar contacts via postal mail with executives of the companies and agencies whose Web sites are causing problems. (Many executives are still more responsive t

Re: 2.0 ?

S. Beaulieu wrote: Phillip Jones a écrit : no really true forms manager built in. That seems to be a feature people liked that not discontinued. I won't deny it's frustrating when it's something one uses constantly. That being said, considering the number of times it's be

Re: 2.0 ?

S. Beaulieu wrote: ---snip--- Features that people liked that got discontinued—it's definitely annoying, but it's not a "problem" or a "bug." It is when people depend upon them. ---snip--- -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it

Re: 2.0 ?

Leonidas Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 2/12/2009 23:36, John Boyle told the world: Phillip Jones wrote: question wrote: Is 2.0 a beta ? At this point official no. To the newsgroup: But from a USERS standpoint, a definite "YES"! :-( S

Re: Sending e-mail later in outbox in SM2.0...

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Phillip Jones wrote: Ant wrote: On 12/1/2009 2:40 AM PT, Daniel typed: Sorry, Martin, where do you get outbox from??? Is this something new for version 2.0?? It doesn't appear, natively,

Re: 2.0 ?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: In a wor, yes. The form manager was left out, ant Phil Chee explained why. He also posted here that the form manager is being reconsidered, which is a good thing. Just as a note, I think it's clear to most people here, but I want to clearly state that

Re: any way to collapse news servers......

Daniel wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Daniel: If I set the preference news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane to TRUE, I would expect the *news* *server* in the *folderpane* to appear *in* the *open* *state*!! No, the open_state of the newsservers, expanded or collapsed, is persistent. ;)

Re: any way to collapse news servers......

Daniel wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Daniel: If I set the preference news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane to TRUE, I would expect the *news* *server* in the *folderpane* to appear *in* the *open* *state*!! No, the open_state of the newsservers, expanded or collapsed, is persistent. ;)

Re: 2.0 ?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: The problem with software design is everyone takes a meat axe approach whacking way and removing anything and everything the developers don't like, or don't use and see no use for. Well, even if you don't want to hear this, I'd

Re: POLITICO coming up blank in SM 1.1.18

cmcadams wrote: But not in IE. For the first time in my experience. Anyone else? http://www.politico.com/ Works for me. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it" http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___

Re: SM 2.0 Forwarding and Wrapping

Martin Freitag wrote: Sqwertz schrieb: When I post long URLs they are wrapping. In previous versions this did not happen. It left the complete URL in tact on one line. It is unacceptable to wrap URL's. This has always been like that, afaik. Just enclose your url in<> brackets and common mail

Re: SM 2.0 Forwarding and Wrapping

S. Beaulieu wrote: Sqwertz wrote: Also, I can't seem to find the setting "Forward messages as ". It's defaulting to attachments, which is also ugly. Edit --> Preferences --> Mail& Newsgroups --> Composition S. Also from Main Menu choose Message then mouse down to Forward Inline. -- P

Re: Using small toolbar icons size...

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 4/12/2009 12:54, Ant told the world: On 12/4/2009 1:29 AM PT, Martin Freitag typed: Is it me or is it hard to click those down arrow buttons sometimes when using small toolbar icon size? It seems like the areas for them are not very accurate. This is when

Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0

Daniel wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that sh

Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

I kept wondering why the download manager didn't kick in and come to front when you start a download. well I had to change this setting: browser.download.manager.focusWhenStarting;true It originally set to false which means you don't know you've even started a download until you actually open

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Shows the people designing the program don't even use it. Shows you don't know what you are talking about (sorry if it sounds offensive, but not any more than your statement is the other way round, think about that). The Download Manager

Re: Bug 105955 - "MailNews Should be Viewable in a Tab" - reopen?

MCBastos wrote: I recently ran into Bug 105955 ( ), which echoes some of my thoughts about Seamonkey. It was marked as WONTFIX back in 2002 by Hixie, under the reason that "we should be separating the programs instead of joining them." Well,

Re: Close Window with Last Tab?

Martin Freitag wrote: MCBastos schrieb: So, what about a preference to make the keyboard shortcuts to behave the same way as the close-tab mouse buttons? I found a reference to a Firefox preference ( browser.tabs.closeWindowWithLastTab ) that does exactly that, and I tried to create it and set i

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Shows the people designing the program don't even use it. Shows you don't know what you are talking about (sorry if it sounds offensive, but not any more than your statement is the other way round, think about

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Rufus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Shows the people designing the program don't even use it. Shows you don't know what you are talking about (sorry if it sounds offensive, but not any more than your statement is the other way round, t

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Shows the people designing the program don't even use it. Shows you don't know what you are talking about (sorry if it sounds offensive, but not any more than your statement is the

Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0

NoOp wrote: On 12/05/2009 06:20 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: Daniel wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Shows the people designing the program don't even use it. Shows you don't know what you are talking about (sorry if it sounds offensive, but no

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Shows the people designing the program don't even use it. Shows you don't know what you are talking about (s

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Shows the people designing the program don't even use it. Shows you don&#

Re: Found reason Download Manager doesn't come up right.

JAS wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Shows the people designing the program don't even use it. Shows you don't

Re: Found reason Download Manager doesn't come up right.

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: I haven't either. never has come up for me. (Mac OSX.4.11) Mac by default is set to use progress windows instead of the download manager, that might play into this. Robert Kaiser Could have something to do with it. but in SM 1.1.18 if you c

Re: Found reason Download Manager doesn't come up right.

Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: I haven't either. never has come up for me. (Mac OSX.4.11) Mac by default is set to use progress windows instead of the download manager, that might play into this. Robert Kaiser I don't think that's true...I think

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Shows the people designing the program

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Martin Freitag wrote: Hartmut Figge schrieb: Martin Freitag: PS: Dudes, delete the unnecessary quotes when answering (pleeeaaase), this is a mess here reading half a book on every post! On the other hand it saves time. When you have decided to skip such monsters instead of reading them. :)

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >