Am 12.01.2011 07:50, schrieb André Joost:
Am 11.01.11 17:01, schrieb Michał Borsuk: You do get that information
when you are at the spot. It is written on
the timetable.
If you are able to see, yes. But disabled (that is everyone who has to
use public transport because he/she is not able to
Am Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:21:41 +0100
schrieb Michał Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.com:
On 11 January 2011 18:59, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) te...@teddy.ch
wrote:
I began searching for alternatives and found Oxomoa, unified
stoparea, stop place and others. All are created because the
current
1) We need to see a proposal that is explicitly scalable. No more than
one page to describe how to map a basic bus or tram line in a way that
is consistent with existing usage (ie if you look around you will see
lots of examples to reinforce your understanding).
2) There is no clear case for a
Am 12.01.2011 11:10, schrieb Albin Michlmayr:
Am Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:21:41 +0100
schrieb Michał Borsukmichal.bor...@gmail.com:
On 11 January 2011 18:59, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy)te...@teddy.ch
wrote:
I began searching for alternatives and found Oxomoa, unified
stoparea, stop place and others.
Am 12.01.2011 11:16, schrieb Richard Mann:
1) We need to see a proposal that is explicitly scalable. No more than
one page to describe how to map a basic bus or tram line in a way that
is consistent with existing usage (ie if you look around you will see
lots of examples to reinforce your
On 12.01.2011 09:52, Michał Borsuk wrote:
Am 12.01.2011 07:50, schrieb André Joost:
Am 11.01.11 17:01, schrieb Michał Borsuk: You do get that information
when you are at the spot. It is written on
the timetable.
If you are able to see, yes. But disabled (that is everyone who has to
use
Richard wrote:
put unified_stoparea as an
elaboration rather than an alternative; I hope it doesn't spark an
edit war).
It might. Unified_stoparea is flawed in that it isn't backwards compatible as
it contradicts the documentation for highway=bus_stop (node beside way) to use
it for the
Am 12.01.2011 12:59, schrieb ant:
Hi Michał,
Certainly it doesn't make sense to talk about bus stops when the road
network isn't even finished yet. Totally agree.
The point is, we are in the process of establishing a kind-of-standard
about public transport network. There has been lots of
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Unified_stoparea is flawed in that it isn't backwards compatible as it
contradicts the documentation for highway=bus_stop (node beside way) to use
it for the stopping position (rather than the platform). This is why the
Le 12/01/2011 11:10, Albin Michlmayr a écrit :
I pretty much came the same way Dominik did. I am also a public
transport fanatic. And I like to map small details and it makes me joy
to when a bus route crossing a roundabout uses one half of the
roundabout in one direction and the other half in
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, nobody is forced into a complicated tagging scheme. Anybody who is
uncomfortable with relations, advanced editors or whatever should just put a
node to each bus stop. That's fine. Another mapper will come and turn it
into a
Am 12.01.2011 15:50, schrieb ant:
Hi,
Ok, nobody is forced into a complicated tagging scheme. Anybody who is
uncomfortable with relations, advanced editors or whatever should just
put a node to each bus stop. That's fine.
And that's what we're about to standarize.
Another mapper will come
On 12.01.2011 16:00, Richard Mann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, antantof...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, nobody is forced into a complicated tagging scheme. Anybody who is
uncomfortable with relations, advanced editors or whatever should just put a
node to each bus stop. That's fine. Another
Am 12.01.2011 16:30, schrieb ant:
Consider an application that takes a start and an end address, maybe
other options such as night lines only, and that shall calculate the
shortest PT connection including number of stops etc. How would you
accomplish that with the old tagging scheme?
By
On 12.01.2011 16:40, Michał Borsuk wrote:
Am 12.01.2011 16:30, schrieb ant:
Consider an application that takes a start and an end address, maybe
other options such as night lines only, and that shall calculate the
shortest PT connection including number of stops etc. How would you
accomplish
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:07 PM, ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
So the point of stop area relations is to prepare the data to be interpreted
as
a network and thus to make routing... easy.
Stop areas are about linking the stop (notionally on the footway) to
the road. Or they are about linking
Hi,
I'm watching this discussion from beginning, and I want to give you some
point to your consideration.
OSM is map solution - I don't want to define what kind of solution (despite
the content is developed by community).
But OSM is a perfect base-platform for every geo-location based internet
2011/1/11 Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) te...@teddy.ch:
Please visit again
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
thank you for the work on this. I have just 2 small comment on this:
A station is an area dedicated to and particularly designed for
passenger access to
I have very belatedly noticed a load of posts to talk-transit needing
moderation. I have been through them all discarding the dross and releasing
the valid ones. Many apologies for people who's posts got held up.
Can we have some offers of additional administrators for this list as I am
the only
On 01/12/2011 05:07 PM, ant wrote:
A node in this context means a
place where i can change from one bus (tram) line to another without
having to walk more than a few metres.In the proposed scheme a stop
area is exactly this.
Sorry, but this is absolutely pointless. First of all, modern
On 01/12/2011 06:34 PM, ant wrote:
On 12.01.2011 17:27, Richard Mann wrote:
I think there is some misunderstanding. I'm talking about the use of
relations to group stop positions and platforms together that are
considered a stop or station where one can change vehicles.
Again, why enter it
GK-Telus Village here:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/?mt0=mapnikmt1=googlehybridlon=121.0327lat=14.67399zoom=18
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:16 AM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
The slum mapping with Philip Paar will be on Saturday Jan 15, 2011.
2nd GK site Telus Village in
I checked the existing coverage of gps traces within bing areas. Aside
from Jolo and Sanga-sanga all of them have GPS tracks we can calibrate
the imagery. See josm shots here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/esambale/sets/72157625812711648/with/5350890259/
A few observations while eye-balling the
A cursory glance suggests Britain appears to have more highway=unsurfaced
than other places, and even then there aren't that many. I will happily fix
200 of them _properly_ (i.e. with what the track actually is, not the
cop-out of highway=road) if someone creates a rendering to highlight where
If someone feels like reviewing the stylesheet and providing a patch,
I'd go for dashed casings rather than solid casings where surface is
specified and it's not one of a small set (paved, asphalt, concrete,
paving_stones).
I've used a similar scheme on my local map (for distinguishing the
On 12 January 2011 14:36, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
By the way, this is a great example of why no approval process
required for tags is a weakness, and not a strength (see Ultimate
list of approved keys,
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.tagging/6203)
No, the lack of
JohnSmitty wrote:
No, the lack of a policy to mass retag is the weakness.
No. You cannot retag once the meaning of a tag has been lost in multiple
different interpretations.
bye
Nop
--
View this message in context:
Dear OSM Community,
for a Design Thinking Workshop in Rumania to “improve the quantity and
quality of address solving software in open maps” we are looking for 4-8
spontaneous and interested mappers that are happy to share there thoughts
and experiences around the topic of address collection and
2011/1/12 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote
You seem to keep getting mixed up between the UK understanding of the
word 'road' and the OSM context of the meaning of highway=road. As you
can read (quoted) in my original email,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:18 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/12 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
As I said, highway=road is not defined as unknown classification, it
is defined as a road of unknown classification.
IMHO that's just a bad definition, because if you don't
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:10:38 -0800 (PST)
NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
JohnSmitty wrote:
No, the lack of a policy to mass retag is the weakness.
No. You cannot retag once the meaning of a tag has been lost in
multiple different interpretations.
bye
Nop
Even
On 01/12/2011 11:39 AM, Anthony wrote:
Which I suppose is one of my main questions. If a way is tagged with
highway=road, and nothing else, should a router route motor vehicle
traffic down it? I would think the answer is yes, which means that
paths which are not meant for motor vehicle traffic
Am 12.01.2011 20:36, schrieb Alex Mauer:
So at best it could be routed with strong “use at your own risk”
warnings. But in general it’s probably best if routers do not send
people down them.
It would be great to have an OSM-Navi giving the user the choice:
- fastest
- shortest
- most
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 01/12/2011 11:39 AM, Anthony wrote:
Which I suppose is one of my main questions. If a way is tagged with
highway=road, and nothing else, should a router route motor vehicle
traffic down it? I would think the answer
Martijn, maar ook anderen...
Mijn server is blijven staan op het niveau van
de server party, en ik heb de automatische updates
aan de gang gekregen.
Is er al een bijgewerkt serve handboek inmiddels...
Ik zou de server graag afmaken tot aan het niveau dat ie zelf
tiles kan serveren in mijn lokale
Ik heb er nog geen tijd voor gehad.
Ik wil het nog in januari doen :)
Heeft iemand anders er nog aan gewerkt?
Martijn
On 1/12/2011 11:58 AM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Martijn, maar ook anderen...
Mijn server is blijven staan op het niveau van
de server party, en ik
Ik ben in principe nog steeds bezig met OSMbuntu, maar ik ben nu bezig
met het bouwen van mijn nieuwe server.
Voor zij die het nog niet gezien ehbben, OSMbuntu wordt een
distributie gebaseerd op Ubuntu Server, die meteen alle OSM software
al bevat. En een extract van een gebied naar keuze,
Jij had toch iets van een script ??
Kan je daar iets uit copypasten, zodat ik
van het weekend weer wat verder kan komen ev met behulp van je IRC adviezen ?
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Peter [mailto:pe...@haas-en-berg.nl]
Verzonden: woensdag 12 januari 2011 16:44
Aan:
On 12 January 2011 16:18, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Cloudbase was at 1600' last time James looked at it, which is a bit too low;
I just spoke to him and whilst we can fly at 1000' if we want (for a 1cm
survey), the buildings in Brisbane are a bit higher than in Perth :)
Only in the
On 12 January 2011 10:05, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/11 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Martin, for your information there was a bit of work done on this sort
of thing in the past for Aussie parks covered by this, based on data
from
On 12 January 2011 17:01, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
I'm working out whether I am able to accept the new OSM terms. I haven't
used the detailed NearMap aerial photos, but what I have used is a
low-quality image at zoom 13 and 14. I used these images for the Kiewa River
in
On 12/01/2011, at 2:48 AM, John Smith wrote:
Martin, for your information there was a bit of work done on this sort
of thing in the past for Aussie parks covered by this, based on data
from http://data.australia.gov.au I think.
I uploaded the dataset I think you're referring to, after
http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps
--
?? ?
Salaam Aleikum
Guilherme Guerra de Almeidaguerri...@comum.org
xmpp: guerri...@jabber-br.org
http://comum.org
http://guerrinha.comum.org
On 12/22/2010 03:30 PM, Fabian Alejandro wrote:
Melhor ainda, se você sabe que é barro, coloca a tag de qualidade da
pavimentação (não lembro o nome agora)
Em 12/01/2011, às 18:55, Flavio Bello Fialho be...@cnpuv.embrapa.br escreveu:
A orientação no Pt-br:Map_Features está muito ruim. A descrição no segundo
link faz mais sentido, mas se
Atualmente eu sigo o Map_Feature, acho que o resultado é melhor e por
enquanto mais conveniente para quem usa os dados no gps.
A tag citada pelo diogo é surface=*, acredito que usei pouca vezes :P
Alexandre Parente Lima
Em 12 de janeiro de 2011 19:10, Diogo Nunes dio...@diogow.com escreveu:
Acredito também que não devemos criar um guia jaboticaba.
Para quem nasceu depois de 1990 e nunca ouviu essa expressão:
*Teoria da jabuticaba é tudo aquilo que só existe no Brasil, como essa
saborosa fruta selvagem da respeitada família das mirtáceas (myrciaria
jaboticaba). Isso significa, para
Am 11.01.2011 23:37, schrieb Stephan Knauss:
On 11.01.2011 19:52, Carsten Moeller wrote:
War jetzt lange nicht mehr am Ball aber schau mal hier:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:windowscli...@home
warum machst du das alles von Hand? Warum nicht einfach einen
Doppelklick auf den Installer?
Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org writes:
Hallo,
On 01/11/2011 10:24 AM, Karsten wrote:
hat jemand eine Ahnung, wie ich im Hintergrund veraltete Kacheln neu rendern
kann und nicht erst, wenn sie im Browser neu angefordert werden.
Ich habe mapnik/Tirex installiert
Schau Dir mal
Am 12.01.2011 01:31, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
irgendein - pardon - Idiot
bitte immer sachlich bleiben. ;-)
sendet seit Tagen taeglich ueber 100.000
einzelne /api/0.6/node/123-Requests an die OSM-API. Die Person kommt aus
Deutschland, aus dem Arcor/Vodafone-DSL-Dialin-Netz. Die IPs werden
On 2011-01-11 23:11, Tirkon wrote:
Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, einen GPX Track in eine Karte (z.B. OSM oder
Google) einzublenden und dann Punkte (z.B. durch Aufziehen eines
Rechteckes) geografisch bezogen rauszulöschen oder den Track zu
teilen?
Ein paar Programme sind im Wiki gelistet:
Hallo,
On 11.01.2011 23:38, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel wrote:
Hallo,
Gibt es eine Möglichkeit Start und Ziel direkt beim Aufruf anzugeben?
Etwa
http://openrouteservice.org/such?start=meinort?ziel=deinort
vielleicht hilft dir die Nur-Text-Version weiter:
Hi Frederick,
habt ihr die Möglichkeit die HTTP-Header mit zu loggen? Evtl. lässt sich
daraus schon erste Schlüsse ziehen... Außerdem ist ein nmap über die zu
sperrende IP-Adresse manchmal hilfreich. Desweiteren könnte man die IP
mal bei einem Geolocationdienst auswerten lassen...
MfG Andreas
Am 11.01.2011 16:05, schrieb Chris66:
mit post office near Lünen kriege ich ein Ergebnis; post offices
geht offensichtlich tatsächlich nicht.
Ticket erstellt.
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3451
In der Wortliste (die jeder ergänzen darf!)
Am Donnerstag 23 Dezember 2010, um 07:30:03 schrieb Christian Knorr:
weiß jemand ob 3 nebeneinander
installierten Maps auf dem Oregon länderübergreifend routingfähig sind?
Ja, das tut es. Habe DE, NL und BE separat drauf und gerade von D nach NL
navigiert, das geht.
[1]
hi,
eventuell wäre eine liste des interessensgebietes doch auch hilfreich.
grast der z.b. eine bbox nach allen daten ab um die xapi zu umgehen oder
macht er das weltweit wie ein bot, liesst er POIs ?
macht er dann auf die gleiche art updates? da müsste er sich ja
authentifizieren.
ich vermute
Hallo,
On 01/12/2011 12:41 PM, Karsten wrote:
Schau Dir mal utils/tirex-create-stats-and-update-tiles.sh an, das kann das.
Ich habe eine bessere Alternative gefunden.
tirex-batch map=osm bbox=5,46,16,56 --filter older\(978328800\) z=12-16
Damit rendert er alle Kacheln neu, die älter als
Hallo,
On 01/12/2011 01:20 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
habt ihr die Möglichkeit die HTTP-Header mit zu loggen? Evtl. lässt sich
daraus schon erste Schlüsse ziehen... Außerdem ist ein nmap über die zu
sperrende IP-Adresse manchmal hilfreich. Desweiteren könnte man die IP
mal bei einem
Mit der Einführung von AIO-Tiles-Manager wird es in Zukunft möglich
sein beliebige Teile von Europa auf seinem Gerät zu benutzen. Routing
funktioniert zwischen den Kacheln. Außerdem kann man uninteressante
Gebiete von Europa von seinem Gerät verbannen, sodass auch User
ältere Geräte mit
Chris66 wrote:
Wie lange sind die IPs jeweils gesperrt? Da man damit ja auch
Unschuldige trifft, sobald der Täter eine neue IP zieht.
Ich denke, dass es sehr unwahrscheinlich ist, dass in der Zeit die IP aus
dem Arcor-Pool jemandem zugeordnet wird, der dann eine solche Abfrage
starten
Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org writes:
Hallo,
On 01/12/2011 12:41 PM, Karsten wrote:
Schau Dir mal utils/tirex-create-stats-and-update-tiles.sh an, das kann
das.
Ich habe eine bessere Alternative gefunden.
tirex-batch map=osm bbox=5,46,16,56 --filter older\(978328800\)
Hallo,
On 01/12/2011 03:33 PM, Karsten wrote:
Naja, ich weiß ja, welche Daten sich geändert haben, weil ich ja die diffs in
Postgres mittels load-next einspiele
Ah, ok, das Detail war mir unklar. Das ist natuerlich eine gute Methode,
um Aenderungen schnell mitzukriegen. Dann hast Du im
Liebe OSM Community,
für einen Design-Thinking Workshop in Rumänien zur “Weiterentwicklung eines
Tools zur Erhöhung der Adressenqualität und -quantität in OSM” suchen wir
spontan für morgen Mittag 4-8 interessierte Mapper die sich über Skype zum
Thema Adresserfassung interviewen lassen. Ziel des
Moin,
Frederik Ramm schrieb am 11.01.2011 20:25:
Es scheint ein Problem mit dem GWDG-Mirror zu geben, der hat sich letzte
Nacht keine neuen Daten geholt. Der Geofabrik-Server schickt Dich aber
trotzdem dahin (im blinden Vertrauen darauf, dass dort die aktuellen
Daten sind).
Da wollte ich es
Hallo
Heute früh hab ich europe.osm.bz2 von dort geladen. Ging ohne Probleme.
Versuch ihn eftl. mal über http://... anzusprechen. So mach ich das immer.
Viele Grüße,
Henning
Am 12.01.2011 16:33, schrieb Torsten Leistikow:
Moin,
Frederik Ramm schrieb am 11.01.2011 20:25:
Es scheint ein
Philip Gillißen schrieb:
Chris66 wrote:
Wie lange sind die IPs jeweils gesperrt? Da man damit ja auch
Unschuldige trifft, sobald der Täter eine neue IP zieht.
Ich denke, dass es sehr unwahrscheinlich ist, dass in der Zeit die IP
aus dem Arcor-Pool jemandem zugeordnet wird, der dann eine
mit post office near Lünen kriege ich ein Ergebnis; post offices
geht offensichtlich tatsächlich nicht.
Ticket erstellt.
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3451
In der Wortliste (die jeder ergänzen darf!)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Special_Phrases/EN
ist die
Torsten Leistikow schrieb am 12.01.2011 16:33:
Da wollte ich es dann heute noch mal mit den neusten Daten versuchen, aber so
richtig gesund sieht ft5.gwdg.de nicht aus. Er antwortet zwar auf ein ping,
und
Index von ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/; bekomme ich im Feuerfuchs auch zu sehen, aber
Hallo!
Am 10.01.11 schrieb ben:
Ich hab gesehen, dass z.B. hier in Leipzig die Stadtteile nur mit
einem Punkt gekennzeichnet sind.
Würden dort Relationen oder sowas Sinn machen?
Relationen wären sinnvoll, wenn Du die Grenzen kennst. Die Situation in
Leipzig schildert
Am 12.01.2011 17:01, schrieb Brian Quinion:
The new word lists have not yet gone live. This problem was one of
the reasons for creating the new wiki pages because previously we were
missing plurals and variations.
The version using the new wiki word lists will go live next week. In
the
When searching Bank nah Lüdinghausen I get (money)banks
and benches (Sitzbanken / amenity=bench) in the result list, because
in german bank has this two meanings.
About an hour ago I deleted the 'bank' = 'amenity=bench' mapping to
remove some general problems it was causing.
I agree this
Hallo Alex,
Kurz weil vom iPhone geschickt, würde aber gerne mitmachen. Skype: dermotm
Dermot
On Wednesday, 12 January 2011, Alexander Steinhart / DThinking
dthinking.a...@nder.info wrote:
Liebe OSM Community,
für einen Design-Thinking Workshop in Rumänien zur “Weiterentwicklung eines
Tools
2011/1/12 fx99 f...@vollbio.de:
mit http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/geocoder/ kann man ADressen in
Koordinatenumwandeln.
AFAIK ist das, da Google und Yahoo verwandt werden, lizenzmäßig nur
frei wie in Bier.
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Cool, merci, Dermot!
Wir haben nun 4 Leute, hätten aber gerne noch 2 um ein gutes Bild zu
bekommen.
Wer hat noch Lust/Zeit?
lg
PS: Es gibt als Dank für alle die teilnehmen einen 15 Euro Amazon Gutschein!
2011/1/12 Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com
Hallo Alex,
Kurz weil vom iPhone
Die IPs zeigen alle nach Eschborn, aber das sagt nichts, der kann
Es gibt auch Geolocationdienste, die nicht alle Arcor-Dialup-IPs in die
Alfred-Herrhausen-Allee verorten.
BTW: Ich sitze dort in Sichtweite, aber ich bin's nicht ;-)
Jemand anders fragte nach der Dauer der Sperrung - im
it should return
* Bank Volksbank Lüdinghausen
* Sitzbank Südwiese Lüdinghausen
It should ask did you mean 'Bankfiliale' or 'Sitzbank'?.
Perhaps with respective links on the guggestions.
-jha-
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Am 12.01.2011 14:55, schrieb fla...@googlemail.com:
PS : Es gibt entsprechende Veröffentlichungen zur Benutzung und
Funktion von AIOTM im OSMBLOg sobald das Tool fertig ist.
Development! Development! Development!
;)
Die Grundfunktionen gehen schon mal ein bisschen. Versuche noch einige
Hallo Fabian,
na das ist doch schonmal was! Vielen Dank dafür!
Nun ist die Frage wie man die Daten wirklich sinnvoll verwursten kann
(darf).
Bei dem ersten Link könnte man das per Hand machen, da jede Begrenzung
beschrieben wird. Leider is das Bild zu klein.
Bei den anderen Links müsste man
Am 10.01.2011 16:08, schrieb Georg Feddern:
Das agricultural=* kommt zwar vom Traktor-Symbol, bezieht sich aber
ganz allgemein auf entsprechend langsame Fahrzeuge, wie auch in der
Beschreibung angegeben (und siehe meine Beispiele).
Ich geh davon aus, dass die Beschreibung (wie so oft)
Ho anche notato che le piste ciclabili sono disegnate diversamente in
alcuni punti della città:
In alcune è segnato semplicemente
highway=cycleway
In altre è scritto così:
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
Il Garmin mi fa andare con la macchina nelle seconde mentre invece non
mi
2011/1/12 Stefano Droghetti stefano.droghe...@gmail.com:
Ho anche notato che le piste ciclabili sono disegnate diversamente in
alcuni punti della città:
In alcune è segnato semplicemente
highway=cycleway
In altre è scritto così:
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
Il Garmin
Il giorno mer, 12/01/2011 alle 15.52 +0100, Federico Cozzi ha scritto:
Ah che incubo highway=path!
1. il Garmin non dovrebbe farti andare in macchina su highway=path,
letteralmente è un sentiero
2. quando fu inventato il tag highway=path non si capiva bene a che
servisse, ci sono tante
Ciao.
Il fatto che il Garmin ti faccia andare su un path dipende da come è fatta la
traduzione dei tag OSM in tag Garmin.
Se provi a costruirti la mappa con CreateIMG
(http://mce66.altervista.org/software.html#Open_Maps_for_Garmin_navigators) non
solo il Garmin non ti manderà più sui path, ma
Il giorno mer, 12/01/2011 alle 15.51 +, Marco Certelli ha scritto:
Ciao.
Il fatto che il Garmin ti faccia andare su un path dipende da come è
fatta la traduzione dei tag OSM in tag Garmin.
Se provi a costruirti la mappa con CreateIMG
2011/1/12 Stefano Droghetti stefano.droghe...@gmail.com:
Oltretutto, ci sono anche alcuni controviali che hanno l'obbligo per le
bici ma non hanno il divieto per le auto. :-O
Questi controviali non sembrano essere piste ciclabili ma vie
regolari, quindi li mapperei come highway=unclassified,
Il 12 gennaio 2011 08:25, Stefano Droghetti
stefano.droghe...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Ultimamente in molte strade il mio Garmin mi dice Percorrendo Sentieri
invece della giusta strada.
La mappa è quella italiana scaricata da gfoss. Zona Ferrara. Ad esempio
Viale IV Novembre.
Accade sempre in
Ciao,
penso che qn. di vuoi usa Merkaartor, forse mi potete aiutare. Un
utente tedesco mi ha scritto che non funziona il PCN da lui. Il suo
messaggio (malamente tradotto al volo):
ho letto questo
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Italy/PCN
e fatto in Merkaartor:
wiki Inserire
intendevo voi ;-)
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Sono curioso di sapere se funziona in wine. Se poi sei un esperto di linux,
potresti tradurlo in uno script bash. Se ti serve aiuto, chiedi pure.
Comunque queste sono le opzioni che uso io:
java -enableassertions -Xmx1000m -jar ..\bin\splitter.jar --mapid=66%FID%001
--max-nodes=100
Il 12 gennaio 2011 17:15, Stefano Droghetti
stefano.droghe...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Sono un felice utilizzatore di Linux, e non ho tra famiglia e amici
alcuna licenza di Windows ^_^
Comunque posso provare a vedere se gira con wine o se c'è un equivalente
per Linux. In genere uso mkgmap con
Ciao Luca,
potresti pubblicare anche lo style (a meno che già non sia disponibile da
qualche parte).
Ciao, Marco.
Da: Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com
A: openstreetmap list - italiano talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Inviato: Mer 12 gennaio 2011, 17:55:41
Il giorno mer, 12/01/2011 alle 17.48 +0100, Luca Delucchi ha scritto:
certo, devo aggiustare la mappa :-)
Nei prossimi giorni ci lavoro su...
Aaaah ok ^_^ ecco perché :D
Comunque, grazie ai suggerimenti degli utenti, ho fatto delle prove, e
il metodo di mettere:
highway=cycleway
2011/1/12 Stefano Droghetti stefano.droghe...@gmail.com:
Mi chiedo, non si può tagliare la testa al toro e mettere un qualche tag
che dica dove le auto NON possono andare?
Magari fosse tutto così semplice...
1. puoi sempre mettere, su ciascuna strada dove le auto non sono
ammesse, il tag
Ah che incubo highway=path!
highway=cycleway
bicycle=official
foot=official
ma perchè usando la preimpostazione di JOSM con il cartello blu mi risulta
invece
highway=path
bicycle=designaded
foot=designaded
???
morsi
___
Talk-it mailing
Il giorno mer, 12/01/2011 alle 18.15 +0100, Stefano Droghetti ha
scritto:
Comunque, grazie ai suggerimenti degli utenti, ho fatto delle prove, e
il metodo di mettere:
highway=cycleway
foot=official
cycleway=official
per le ciclabili funziona benissimo. Il Garmin non pensa più di essere
Il -10/01/-28163 20:59, Federico Cozzi ha scritto:
2011/1/12 Stefano Droghetti stefano.droghe...@gmail.com:
Ho anche notato che le piste ciclabili sono disegnate diversamente in
alcuni punti della città:
In alcune è segnato semplicemente
highway=cleway
In altre è scritto così:
highway=th
2011/1/12 Fabri erfab...@gmail.com:
Siete sicuri che sia giusto cambiare i tag della ciclabile per non far
sbagliare il Garmin? Su JOSM il preset per le ciclabili miste (bici +
pedoni) è quello con highway=path e bicycle=designated foot=designated
segregated=yes/no
Premesso che, come dicevo,
Non mi sembra il modo giusto di operare. Se non dobbiamo mappare per il
render,
figuriamoci se dobbiamo mappare per la mappa garmin fatta in un modo invece
che
in un altro.
Secondo me la mappa OSM non va toccata (soprattutto se è solo per mettere un
tag implicito). E' chi produce la
Il giorno mer, 12/01/2011 alle 17.48 +, Marco Certelli ha scritto:
Non mi sembra il modo giusto di operare. Se non dobbiamo mappare per
il render, figuriamoci se dobbiamo mappare per la mappa garmin fatta
in un modo invece che in un altro.
Secondo me la mappa OSM non va toccata
2011/1/12 Marco Certelli marco_certe...@yahoo.it:
Non mi sembra il modo giusto di operare. Se non dobbiamo mappare per il
render, figuriamoci se dobbiamo mappare per la mappa garmin fatta in un modo
invece che in un altro.
No, aspetta.
C'è il solito fraintendimento di base su non mappare per
Il 12 gennaio 2011 18:55, Stefano Droghetti ha scritto:
Comunque io adesso non sto cambiando i tag, sto solo aggiungendo
motorcar=no alle zone in cui è vietato per le auto, il che mi sembra
anche plausibile. O no?
no, seguendo questo ragionamento se scopri che il router ti manda in
macchina
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
