Why not setup a "Wave" server, using google Wave software. It's open
source, and really efficient for real time as well as non real time
communication. Alternative a google server could be used, but then it is
just like other proprietary tools (though based on opensource software).
___
Hello!
> Dave, if you have a suggestion that would let us communicate in real
> time (not over weeks via email) then please share this with the group.
I have another suggestion: learn how to use e-mail efficiently :-)
An e-mail discussion need not take weeks if all interested people respond
at l
Hi,
On 05/04/11 03:23, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Dave, if you have a suggestion that would let us communicate in real
time (not over weeks via email) then please share this with the group.
The alternative to communicating in real-time is fundamentally changing
your organisational structure to r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2011-05-04 03:23, Serge Wroclawski skrev:
> Dave, if you have a suggestion that would let us communicate in real
> time (not over weeks via email) then please share this with the group.
The problem is that with the need for real time, at best 1/3 of
Dave,
This issue comes up constantly and no group has found any solutions
which are ideal.
Some folks suggest meetings using, say Gnome meeting, and then they're
doled it's hard to set up, so Skype is suggested. Then some say Skype
is proprietary, so we should switch to a phone conference system.
Sent: Tue, May 3, 2011 6:53:45 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
On 02/05/2011 13:36, Grant Slater wrote:
> OK, lets find a time that works better. World Time Server Meeting
> planner: http://bit.ly/kBuc2L
> 1pm UTC seems like the best option to me or what do you think?
Everything would be better if Dave F. was in charge. The trains would
run on time, logos would go through his personal approval process and
unicorns would frolic near a turquoise lake in the sun.
So, anyway, Grant was trying to be nice to you and offering to bring you
in to the process that ev
On 02/05/2011 13:36, Grant Slater wrote:
OK, lets find a time that works better. World Time Server Meeting
planner: http://bit.ly/kBuc2L
1pm UTC seems like the best option to me or what do you think? Or
maybe we should alternate?
What part of "Don't use IRC" did you not comprehend?
Just becaus
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Thomas Davie wrote:
>
> On 2 May 2011, at 11:18, Dave F. wrote:
>
>> On 02/05/2011 05:53, Andrew Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> I just had to comment on this because I could hardly believe what I was
>>> reading.
>>>
>>> In a global, world-wide-web, no matter what time is
On 2 May 2011 12:43, Dave F. wrote:
> On 02/05/2011 05:53, Andrew Gregory wrote:
>>
>> I just had to comment on this because I could hardly believe what I was
>> reading...
>
> A quick note to point out that we'd wouldn't be able to have this discussion
> on IRC as we either live in different time
SteveC schrieb:
You will also find discussion of this list in that meeting. If I had posted the
new logo idea here before doing anything there would have been a gigantic
discussion on it and nothing would happen. Any progress at all in any direction
now means at least 5 or 10 people on this li
On 02/05/2011 05:53, Andrew Gregory wrote:
I just had to comment on this because I could hardly believe what I
was reading...
A quick note to point out that we'd wouldn't be able to have this
discussion on IRC as we either live in different time zones or our sleep
patterns are asynchronous.
Hi,
On 05/02/11 12:22, Thomas Davie wrote:
Discuss on this forum instead of IRC. It's self recording of
*everything* that's said& allows *all* to contribute at *all*
times.
But causes discussions that could be had in 10 minutes to get spread
out over 10 weeks ;)
Dave is right about the adva
On 2 May 2011, at 11:18, Dave F. wrote:
> On 02/05/2011 05:53, Andrew Gregory wrote:
>>
>> I just had to comment on this because I could hardly believe what I was
>> reading.
>>
>> In a global, world-wide-web, no matter what time is selected for an IRC (or
>> whatever) meeting, it's going to
On 02/05/2011 05:53, Andrew Gregory wrote:
I just had to comment on this because I could hardly believe what I
was reading.
In a global, world-wide-web, no matter what time is selected for an
IRC (or whatever) meeting, it's going to be inconvenient for
*someone*. Deal with it!
No. Don't u
On 2 May 2011 09:03, Dave F. wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 20:50, Nic Roets wrote:
>
>> Note that open IRC is the Internet equivalent to the town hall
>> meetings.
>>
>
> No, it's not. Those occur in the time zone of the those involved.
>
> IRC meetings, on the other hand, occur outside of many OSM user
On 01/05/2011 20:50, Nic Roets wrote:
Note that open IRC is the Internet equivalent to the town hall
meetings.
No, it's not. Those occur in the time zone of the those involved.
IRC meetings, on the other hand, occur outside of many OSM users
waking/working day.
This is another reason for th
Elizabeth,
I don't see David's comments as constructive. Terms like "consulting
the community" is quite vague and Steve has said that many of his
prior efforts to consult the community end in flame wars.
Now let me give it a try: I think the OSMF should make (more) use of
polling. Not for everyth
Frederick, I think you are right, and we need to find a sane way of doing things
as you put it. In this case, it would have worked well to put a message on this
mailing list saying that the strategic working group exists, they are charged
with looking after the OSM logo among other things, and the
thank you Frederik
== Mikel Maron ==
+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
From: Frederik Ramm
To: David Murn
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sun, May 1, 2011 5:21:53 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
> Unfortunately, be
+1
Regards,
Gert Gremmen
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Elizabeth Dodd [mailto:ed...@billiau.net]
Verzonden: Sunday, May 01, 2011 4:51 AM
Aan: talk@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Mikel Maron wrote:
> Da
Elizabeth Dodd writes:
> ... you make major decisions behind closed doors ...
Have you knocked on the door and asked to be let in?
Nobody who is whinging has answered that question. Obviously, because
they haven't. Easier to whinge than actually do work.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russn
If you wanna critize SWG/OSMF *again*, please, create new thread but
don't spam this one. I know there is lot of desire to express pain how
communication doesn't work between some very loud minority and OSMF,
but please, do it properly.
About logo - new version looks excellent in high resolution,
2011/5/1 Ilya Zverev :
> I guess, the old logo should remain for low zooms (favicons, for example).
I agree and would go even further: the new "logo" is actually a clip
art, nicer to have it on the website, but not really suitable as a
"logo". The old one instead is more logo-like (even if it too
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> It would be great if we could somehow reboot and arrive at
> something sane again.
Superb posting. +1 to all of that.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-Logo-in-the-Wiki-tp6319413p6321156.html
Sent from the General Discuss
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
Unfortunately, being involved in an OSMF (or SWG, LWG, DWG, etc) meeting
isnt as easy as 'just showing up'. Infact, its not even really possible
to be invovled by reading the minutes or the meeting notes. Those of us
who wish to be involved, join public discussions and fo
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 09:40:39PM +, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
> I assume that the "twice a year change" and the "funny, alliterative
> animal names" are references to Ubuntu Linux. Note that, while each
> release of Ubuntu has its own name, the Ubuntu logo has remained
> unchanged for year
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:32:34PM -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Jochen Topf wrote:
> > Don't be so hard on the Strategic Working Group. After months of talks
> > they have actually done something! I think we should celebrate that!
> > After dipping their toes into many important subjects fo
Andreas Perstinger wrote:
Is the current logo change a major decision for you?
See also Robert's comparison:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Oldtonew_logo.gif).
Actually it just highlights all of the problems nicely. Having been required to
comply with the needs of the visually impair
Very nice. My favorite is the twitter one.
On 4/30/2011 9:41 PM, Andreas Perstinger wrote:
On 2011-05-01 00:48, Robert Naylor wrote:
Quick animated gif of the change:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Oldtonew_logo.gif
Its not that much of a change - its still very much the OSM logo, as
On 2011-05-01 05:54, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
let me rewrite the piece from David Murn
a big part of the discussion is the way that we as a community are
treated. If SWG and OSMF feel they have the power to do what they
want without consulting the community, then those handful of mappers
should b
On 2011-05-01 00:48, Robert Naylor wrote:
Quick animated gif of the change:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Oldtonew_logo.gif
Its not that much of a change - its still very much the OSM logo, as
is the numerous other version currently in use.
+1.
A quick Google search shows some examp
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Mikel Maron wrote:
> This has not been constructive in the slightest. Inflammatory and
> untrue. I don't have time for this. Most of us don't. You're making a
> mockery of the hard work that's gone into this project.
> Stop. Just stop.
>
>
let me rewrit
lk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sat, April 30, 2011 9:51:07 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Mikel Maron wrote:
> David, this is complete nonsense. Please stop.
> -Mikel
You get constructive criticism and and so you promptly disregard
Elizabeth Dodd writes:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
> Mikel Maron wrote:
>
> > David, this is complete nonsense. Please stop.
> > -Mikel
>
> You get constructive criticism and and so you promptly disregard it.
> You actually prove the point.
Actually, no. David completely
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Mikel Maron wrote:
> David, this is complete nonsense. Please stop.
> -Mikel
You get constructive criticism and and so you promptly disregard it.
You actually prove the point.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstr
M
*Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 09:03 -0700, SteveC wrote:
> You will also find discussion of this list in that meeting. If I had
> posted the new logo idea here before doing anything there would have
> been a gigantic discussion on it and nothing would h
David, this is complete nonsense. Please stop.
-Mikel
From: David Murn
To: SteveC
Cc: "talk@openstreetmap.org"
Sent: Sat, April 30, 2011 6:15:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 09:03 -0700, SteveC wrote:
On Sun, 01 May 2011 10:52:52 +1000
David Murn wrote:
> > Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that you are correct. Have
> > you ever tried to join a committee and been rebuffed?
>
> For the past 2 years Ive been a secretary of a national non-profit
> organisation in my country.
I think th
Thanks for your reply. I've fixed your speling and the grammar. and
you're punctuation and you have several run-on sentences with tense
problems that I am fixed.
-russ
David Murn writes:
> On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 20:30 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
>
> > Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that
Just a comment, I suspect the discussion we are having about the changes to
the logo and license etc are a symptom of something much deeper. I do get
the feeling that there is a disconnect between what is being perceived and
what the intentions are. There seems to be a perception floating in the
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 20:30 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that you are correct. Have you
> ever tried to join a committee and been rebuffed?
For the past 2 years Ive been a secretary of a national non-profit
organisation in my country. If we had made decisio
David Murn writes:
> On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 09:03 -0700, SteveC wrote:
> > You will also find discussion of this list in that meeting. If I had
> > posted the new logo idea here before doing anything there would have
> > been a gigantic discussion on it and nothing would happen.
>
> What a lo
Lester Caine writes:
> So what is being done for those of us who invested in high
> visibility vests which are now obsolete? And those who have paid
> for printing which now needs to be redone.
Mellow out, Lester. Conrail hasn't existed in the US since 1999, and
there are still locomotives that
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 09:03 -0700, SteveC wrote:
> You will also find discussion of this list in that meeting. If I had
> posted the new logo idea here before doing anything there would have
> been a gigantic discussion on it and nothing would happen.
What a load of bollocks. Has the OSMF ever ch
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:43:09 +0100, Frederik Ramm
wrote:
The point I am trying to make is did anybody changing the logo even
consider the other areas that money would have been spent? I see
pictures of large banners in addition to the vests which no longer match
the current style of the
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> I see pictures of large banners in addition to the vests which no longer
> match the current style of the website!
And I see absolutely no problem with this. The new logo is not at all
substantially different from the old one. It is a stylist
Hi,
Lester Caine wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Also how much stock of the current logo version is left on the shelves
of those supplying it?
I have no idea but if it were my stock, I'd probably re-print the old
logo without a second thought.
And just take the hit on the wasted costs out of th
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Also how much stock of the current logo version is left on the shelves
of those supplying it?
I have no idea but if it were my stock, I'd probably re-print the old
logo without a second thought.
And just take the hit on the wasted costs out of their own pocket?
The point
Since this mailing list is about the new logo now, I'd like to point out
some things concerning it that got "broken".
First of all, wiki logo was a bit different from osm.org: it had a little
"W" in the corner.
The new logo's contrast is too low, so the favicon is not recognizable at a
glance. A
Hi,
Lester Caine wrote:
So http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSM_Hi_Vis_Back.jpg is not
going to be changed?
That vest uses a logo that differs much *more* from the old web page
logo that the newly installed logo on the web page does.
So if your reasoning is that what is on the web p
Lester Caine wrote:
> > Calm down. Our merchanidse is not "out of date" just because the logo
> > has been touched up.
> So http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSM_Hi_Vis_Back.jpg is not
> going to be changed? At least it does say who we are working for, while
> the new logo is just a fussy p
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Calm down. Our merchanidse is not "out of date" just because the logo
has been touched up.
So http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSM_Hi_Vis_Back.jpg is not going to
be changed? At least it does say who we are working for, while the new logo is
just a fussy picture whic
have been discussed, or at least
announced, well in advance, not done as a surprise to everyone except whatever
committee made the change.
---Original Email-------
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
>From :mailto:frede...@remote.org
Date :Sat Apr 30 16:27:19 America/Chicago 2
Jochen Topf wrote:
> Don't be so hard on the Strategic Working Group. After months of talks
> they have actually done something! I think we should celebrate that!
> After dipping their toes into many important subjects for the future of
> OSM they have chosen the logo change as the most importa
Hi,
Lester Caine wrote:
So what is being done for those of us who invested in high visibility
vests which are now obsolete? And those who have paid for printing which
now needs to be redone. A LITTLE notification of such a major change
would have been nice.
I propose this:
From now on, we
SteveC wrote:
Instead of taking 8 weeks to have a process, let's treat it as 8 weeks where
anyone can help fix these theoretical and technical logo issues. It's right
there, anyone can help. So who's going to do it?
Steve
So what is being done for those of us who invested in high visibility
Martijn van Exel-3 wrote:
>
> Don't get me wrong - I'm not a proponent of any of that corporate identity
> Scheiße, but the fact of the matter is that there are innumerable
> publications using the now-defunct OSM logo and it's going to confuse
> people
> if they see a different logo for what we
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Martijn,
>
>
> Martijn van Exel wrote:
>
>> I'd have to concur. Firstly, a new logo is not something you roll out on
>> its own, it's part of a new 'corporate identity'
>>
>
> To be honest, if SWG started forming a "corporate identity subcom
On 30 April 2011 19:04, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Grant Slater writes:
> > Do you think the new logo is an improvement over the old logo?
>
> If I had only published this logo a month ago, we wouldn't be having
> this argument now:
>
> http://russnelson.com/temp/russ-osm-logo.gif
>
While amusing, I d
Grant Slater writes:
> Do you think the new logo is an improvement over the old logo?
If I had only published this logo a month ago, we wouldn't be having
this argument now:
http://russnelson.com/temp/russ-osm-logo.gif
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
The first of every month|s
I'm not going to answer that.
But I did go on record today on the one of German list with the remark,
that FOSM does have a sole thing going for it, a better logo, but that
was not really difficult. It has just become a tiny bit harder.
Simon
PS: I don't think it is necessary to discuss eve
On 30 April 2011 17:32, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/4/30 Frederik Ramm :
>> I like the haphazard way in which things are done around here. And I'm not
>> saying this tongue-in-cheek, I really do. It gives me hope that we're not
>> yet in a situation where every improvement has to go through
On 30 April 2011 18:21, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> I just don't see what wanting to avoid flame wars on this list (which will
> happen anyway QED), has to do with informing the large majority of
> participants in OSM in advance of, not unimportant, changes and events.
>
Hi Simon,
Do you think the ne
I just don't see what wanting to avoid flame wars on this list (which
will happen anyway QED), has to do with informing the large majority of
participants in OSM in advance of, not unimportant, changes and events.
Simon
___
talk mailing list
talk@o
Is there an SVG version or did I miss it?
On 4/30/2011 9:32 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/4/30 Frederik Ramm:
I like the haphazard way in which things are done around here. And I'm not
saying this tongue-in-cheek, I really do. It gives me hope that we're not
yet in a situation where every
I am almost sure that also the original creator would make some small
improvements if asked. The motivation to get into details is much
higher when it is not a simple draft but you know that the result will
be used millions of times in the web...
I also suggest to work on a low-res version and a b
Richard Welty wrote:
> given that we have a new logo, is it possible to get more size options
> uploaded to
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Logo
How about
http://wiki.osm.org/w/images/thumb/7/79/Public-images-osm_logo.svg/256px-Public-images-osm_logo.svg.png
or this one?
http://wiki.osm.o
2011/4/30 Frederik Ramm :
> I like the haphazard way in which things are done around here. And I'm not
> saying this tongue-in-cheek, I really do. It gives me hope that we're not
> yet in a situation where every improvement has to go through some sort of
> complicated three-level approval process.
On 30 April 2011 17:24, SteveC wrote:
>
> Instead of taking 8 weeks to have a process, let's treat it as 8 weeks where
> anyone can help fix these theoretical and technical logo issues. It's right
> there, anyone can help. So who's going to do it?
>
I've updated the OSM logos on Wikipedia, meta
Come on Martin. Look, yes we can always, always be better at communication. But
if we had a process like that we might have got to actually one day putting a
new logo up. In the process with all the flames and the people screaming no,
and all that, the people actually doing then work would get d
ijn van Exel ; osm
Sent: Sat, April 30, 2011 11:12:31 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
Mikel and SWG don't have to take all this, I did it so flame me Jochen.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Apr 30, 2011, at 9:04, Mikel Maron wrote:
So tired of the bad attitude in OSM. Perhaps
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:54 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen wrote:
> What are you all whining about ?
> The new CT clearly transfers most of your rights
> to OSMF, and this what happens if you transfer rights
> to a self appointed group of people that have joint
> together to do
2011/4/30 SteveC :
> You will also find discussion of this list in that meeting. If I had posted
> the new logo idea here before doing anything there would have been a gigantic
> discussion on it and nothing would happen.
I remember a different process when the foundation got its logo, and
it d
Martijn,
Martijn van Exel wrote:
I'd have to concur. Firstly, a new logo is not something you roll out on
its own, it's part of a new 'corporate identity'
To be honest, if SWG started forming a "corporate identity subcommittee"
I'd probably run away screaming. (They would provide local chapt
g to do anything.
>
> From: Jochen Topf
> To: Martijn van Exel
> Cc: osm
> Sent: Sat, April 30, 2011 10:53:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 04:11:52PM +0200, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:56 PM
given that we have a new logo, is it possible to get more size options
uploaded to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Logo
i'm working on a presentation, and it'd be nice to put the new logo
on the title page, but 120x120 is a bit small.
thanks,
richard
On samedi 30 avril 2011 at 17:54, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen wrote :
> What are you all whining about ?
> The new CT clearly transfers most of your rights
> to OSMF, and this what happens if you transfer rights
> to a self appointed group of people that have joint
> together to
So tired of the bad attitude in OSM. Perhaps you're just trying to be funny
Jochen, but really, this makes me want to quit trying to do anything.
From: Jochen Topf
To: Martijn van Exel
Cc: osm
Sent: Sat, April 30, 2011 10:53:46 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM
You will also find discussion of this list in that meeting. If I had posted the
new logo idea here before doing anything there would have been a gigantic
discussion on it and nothing would happen. Any progress at all in any direction
now means at least 5 or 10 people on this list don't like it.
What are you all whining about ?
The new CT clearly transfers most of your rights
to OSMF, and this what happens if you transfer rights
to a self appointed group of people that have joint
together to do what *they* think is best for OSM, and got
the power from the community.
This was the first st
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 04:11:52PM +0200, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:56 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > wrote:
>
> > I noticed that there is a new OSM logo in the wiki. I find it strange
> > that important things like changing the well established logo of the
> > project are be
2011/4/30 Mikel Maron :
> From: Simon Poole
>> While I don't quite understand why the SWG has turned in to the WDWG (Web
>> Design Working Group)
> SWG has taken this on because the usability of the site is a the primary way
> users, new and old, engage with OSM, there are definitely issues with i
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:56 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I noticed that there is a new OSM logo in the wiki. I find it strange
> that important things like changing the well established logo of the
> project are beeing changed without any discussion or notice on any of
> the lists, or did I
Am 30.04.2011 um 15:55 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
> Hi,
>
> I don't have issues with the process (I wasn't involved in selecting the
> old logo so I don't mind others caring for that). But I think that something
> is technically wrong with the new logo; I think if you were looking at a
> magnif
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
> SWG has taken this on because the usability of the site is a the primary way
> users, new and old, engage with OSM, there are definitely issues with it,
> and we're trying to put together the right _approach_ to improve it.
Unfortunately a lo
Hi,
I don't have issues with the process (I wasn't involved in selecting
the old logo so I don't mind others caring for that). But I think that
something is technically wrong with the new logo; I think if you were
looking at a magnifying glass from the angle chosen here, the end of the
han
From: Simon Poole
> While I don't quite understand why the SWG has turned in to the WDWG (Web
>Design Working Group) (it does seem to be a bit outside it's charter ...), I
>believe Martin issue is with the
>
> rampant re-active instead of pro-active information policy that infects all
>parts
Am 30.04.2011 um 15:05 schrieb Simon Poole:
> Grant
>
> While I don't quite understand why the SWG has turned in to the WDWG (Web
> Design Working Group) (it does seem to be a bit outside it's charter ...), I
> believe Martin issue is with the rampant re-active instead of pro-active
> informa
Grant
While I don't quite understand why the SWG has turned in to the WDWG
(Web Design Working Group) (it does seem to be a bit outside it's
charter ...), I believe Martin issue is with the rampant re-active
instead of pro-active information policy that infects all parts of OSM.
Not that I do
On 30 April 2011 12:56, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I noticed that there is a new OSM logo in the wiki. I find it strange
> that important things like changing the well established logo of the
> project are beeing changed without any discussion or notice on any of
> the lists, or did I miss somet
I noticed that there is a new OSM logo in the wiki. I find it strange
that important things like changing the well established logo of the
project are beeing changed without any discussion or notice on any of
the lists, or did I miss something? Or was the site hacked?
cheers,
Martin
_
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Zeptomoon wrote:
>
> Would this tell you or remind you of something?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSM_Logo_World_Green.plain.png
Cool idea. Would need some tweaking to make it easier on the eyes.
The problem is that it looks nasty at the smaller sc
Hi,
Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> including but not limited to OpenStreetMap.)
>
> Interesting that you point it out that way. Because this is exactly not
> what I've been perceiving when talking to the board members. I actually
> think 'exclusively' might be a better representation of real life.
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 18-05-10 14:01, Frederik Ramm schreef:
> including but not limited to OpenStreetMap.)
Interesting that you point it out that way. Because this is exactly not
what I've been perceiving when talking to the board members. I actually
think 'exclusive
Hi,
Zeptomoon wrote:
> Of course, there is room for improvement.
> I drafted it this morning.
> Feedback? Too bold? Too WIKI?
I think it has a funny edge, it looks as if the little people are
trapped in a spider web. Maybe change the slogan to: "OSMF... we'll get
you sooner or later!"
(Obviou
2010/5/18 Zeptomoon :
> Would this tell you or remind you of something?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSM_Logo_World_Green.plain.png
>
>
> Okay, it steals one element from another (very famous) community
> project. But, it's still very distinct.
> After all, there is some thing that c
Would this tell you or remind you of something?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSM_Logo_World_Green.plain.png
Okay, it steals one element from another (very famous) community
project. But, it's still very distinct.
After all, there is some thing that connects us:
"The Free WIKI world ma
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:49 AM, SteveC wrote:
> > Yes you could take the existing logo and just make it red or something,
> > but that's just not nearly as appealing as changing it fundamentally
> > because there's a sea of other ideas out there that are
2010/5/18 SteveC :
> You couldn't sort of extrapolate forward from a GIS system to OSM. You
> couldn't extrapolate from crappy Nokia phones forward to the > iPhone
> (without hindsight, of course).
I think you're comparing apples and oranges here. You can't compare a
logo (an abstract graphic w
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
