> Stefano
>
> 2015-11-22 12:37 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
> <mailto:si...@poole.ch>>:
>
> It is not as if there are not numerous alternative addressing schemes
> see for example this list (which was produced for an open system from,
> gosh,
? there are 4 responses to your mail, at least one with a question that
you haven't answered .
Am 19.11.2015 um 08:51 schrieb Lars-Daniel Weber:
> Three days are gone and still no discussion about this topic.
> I think, nobody is really interested in discovering license violations and
>
For those that do not read weeklyOSM/Wochennotiz (you really should)
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/celex.jsf?celex=62014CJ0490=de=TXT=
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Am 19.11.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Paul Johnson:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
> <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:
>
> This seems a bit of an odd time to announce a schism and I'm sure
> you didn't intend for your statement to
Am 19.11.2015 um 15:53 schrieb Blake Girardot:
>
> It is a ridiculous statement on its face; obviously HOT does not
> succeed if OSM does not succeed.
I think we fully agree and if you recheck you will see that I said
essentially the same.
>
> As to the original issue Ramm raised:
>
> Most
This seems a bit of an odd time to announce a schism and I'm sure you
didn't intend for your statement to come across as it just did.
While rabid anti-OSMers are gaining more power and influence in HOT and
MM, I do assume that the majority of the HOT and MM communities are not
falling in to the
the sign up process without creating a cascade of
further problems.
Simon
PS: given that this is slowly getting very off topic , I would suggest
carrying on the discussion on the legal-talk list.
Am 18.11.2015 um 02:26 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
>
> Am 18.11.2015 um 01:26 schrieb Kate Chapman:
&g
the sign up process without creating a cascade of
further problems.
Simon
PS: given that this is slowly getting very off topic , I would suggest
carrying on the discussion on the legal-talk list.
Am 18.11.2015 um 02:26 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
>
> Am 18.11.2015 um 01:26 schrieb Kate Chapman:
&g
Holger,
I suspect that the regional OpenStreetMap organisations would be good
partners for setting up local events and press coverage even though it
is a bit short term (there is no one complete list but
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters#Existing_local_chapters
and
I assume that you have got legal advice on the COPPA related
consequences of your activities and are willing to share this with the OSMF?
Simon
Am 17.11.2015 um 02:45 schrieb Steven Johnson:
> Hello list,
>
> Just in time for #OSMGeoweek, TeachOSM with support from Mapstory.org
> and American
der the age of 13. What is the issue?
>
> -Kate
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
> <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:
>
> Thais good, but doesn't address the OSM side of things.
>
> Historically, aka pre 2013 revisi
Du vergisst natürlich nur eine Kleinigkeit (respektive redest dir seit
Jahren was schön)
all die Daten die schon damals.und auch jetzt, in OSM sind die
mindestens einen indirekten Quellenhinweis verlangen.
Natürlich können wir, wenn wir jetzt aufhören Drittquellen zu verwenden,
so in ca. 70
Am 18.11.2015 um 01:26 schrieb Kate Chapman:
> Hi Simon,
>
> The groups releasing Geobadges "TeachOSM with support from
> Mapstory.org and American Geographical Society" are not large
> multi-million dollar US organizations. None of them have highly paid
> in-house lawyers. Thank you for
gt; 2. We're removing the Grade 3-5 option, since clearly that would be
> marketed to under 13.
>
> Thanks for your concern. Hope I've addressed your question. Best regards,
>
>
> -- SEJ
> -- twitter: @geomantic
> -- skype: sejohnson8
>
> "Wretches, utter wretches
So was wie "Attributierung" gibt es nicht, wie wärs mal mit Deutsch.
Es gibt im Urheberrecht überhaupt keine Pflicht seine Rechte
durchzusetzen auch wenn du seit Jahren immer wieder den gleichen
Blödsinn behauptest.
Simon
Am 17.11.2015 um 20:58 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at
5 um 22:34 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:11:23PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
>> So was wie "Attributierung" gibt es nicht, wie wärs mal mit Deutsch.
>>
>> Es gibt im Urheberrecht überhaupt keine Pflicht seine Rechte
>> durchzusetzen auc
Lars, is there any indication that the site uses for the map anything
else than existing OSM data?
Note that we do not require trivial transformations of OSM data to be
published as long as the original data is available (for very obvious
reasons). See
Am 14.11.2015 um 18:04 schrieb Michał Brzozowski:
... lots of stuff ...
This is not a new complaint/moan. The major issue is the people that
have made OSM one of/their major hobby (aka us) fretting about the fact
that lots of other people just joined to fix something or test. They
typically
As i already pointed out, the problem is not so much fixing obvious
mistakes (typos, clear misclassification) thank you for that, but
wanting conformity to inconclusive results of discussions on a fairly
obscure mailing list.
One of the great strengths of OSM is that you can invent tagging on
Am 06.11.2015 um 21:42 schrieb Andrew Guertin:
> ...
> Does anyone know if this was discussed anywhere?
It seems to be a result of a misguided discussion on the tagging list,
which came to the conclusion that data consumers need to be protected
from the (typically very low number) the dangerous
You may have seen an early version of this either on legal-talk or via
WeeklyOSM/WochenNotiz. It's gone through a number of revisions since
then and has incorporated input from a number of sources. Thanks to
everybody that took the time to work on it. Content wise this version is
slightly less
You may have seen an early version of this either on legal-talk or via
WeeklyOSM/WochenNotiz. It's gone through a number of revisions since
then and has incorporated input from a number of sources. Thanks to
everybody that took the time to work on it. Content wise this version is
slightly less
Am 05.11.2015 um 11:22 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> are we going to define "geometry type", "primary feature data" and
> "primary map feature"? E.g. is a "multiline string" or a "group of
> nodes" a geometry type?
> What is a "property" and how is it different to a "primary map
> feature" or
Am 04.11.2015 um 06:06 schrieb Max:
> Could the renderer take the number of lanes and/or with information of
> the road into account? Then we would not have this issue.
>
The rendering database currently does not include the lanes value, or
put differently any such feature would have to weight
Am 25.10.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Blake Girardot:
> ..
> I think Simon was talking about a slightly different issue than HOT's
> use of open data from the Mexican government as part of HOT's
> activities related to this disaster.
Yes correct, CC-by compatibility is always a hot topic and I didn't
Just nipping this in the bud: the statement from Sarah Hinchliff Pearson
is here
http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/2013-January/008279.html
She clearly didn't say that CC-by v3 was compatible with the ODbL in the
sense that the ODbL alone would suffice as the distribution licence of
Am 22.10.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Barth:
> Hi,
>
> ich muss sagen, der Thread war für mich jetzt irgendwie ganz interessant
> und aufschlussreich.
>
> Simon Poole schrieb:
>> [...]
>> die LWG verlässt sich daraf, dass Fälle die nicht von der "Community&
Am 22.10.2015 um 20:20 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015, Simon Poole wrote:
>> Ich hab ein paar Stichproben bei den
>> aktuelleren, offenen Fällen (post Lizenzwechsel) gemacht davon war
>> eine nicht als OSM basierende Karte erkennbar und bei d
Am 22.10.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
> Naja - was heißt hier 'wird ignoriert' - die Liste dokumentiert eine
> ganze Reihe von Fällen von Lizenzverletzungen und in einigen Fällen
> wurden diese definitiv nicht behoben obwohl die Unternehmen darauf
> aufmerksam gemacht wurden.
>
>
Am 22.10.2015 um 10:26 schrieb Samuel Kutter:
> Hallo allerseits,
>
> 1. mir ist auf einer Internetseite (http://www.tours3.com/tours), die
> OSM-Karten benützt, aufgefallen, dass keine korrekte Quellenangaben ((c)
> OSM contributors etc) vorhanden sind.
>
> Ich bin dem nachgegangen und habe
Am 22.10.2015 um 13:22 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> Im Endeffekt, das habe ich aus den letzten Jahren mitgenommen, wird
>> man niemanden je vor Gericht bringen, zumindest war das bisher so,
>> insbesondere, wenn der andere sehr groß ist.
Am 22.10.2015 um 14:42 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> Am 22. Oktober 2015 um 14:03 schrieb Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch>:
>
>> In beiden Fällen die Martin genannt hat wurden die fraglichen Firmen
>> kontaktiert und in beiden Fällen wurde das Verhalten geändert,
>>
&
Am 22.10.2015 um 15:09 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
>
> dafür ist ja klar).
> Es gibt in
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
>
> definitiv einige Fälle, in denen auch nach Hinweis keine lizenzkonforme
> Attributierung stattfand. Ob das jetzt daran liegt, dass der
Ich würde ev. das
http://www.amazon.com/2000-GLONASS-RECEIVER-iPod-iPhone/dp/B00COLB9FS
empfehlen, Bedienung ist zwar nicht gerade der Hammer, ist aber billig
und tut was es soll, für mapillary mindestens (habs jetzt nie als
klassischen Logger zum Tracks aufnehmen verwendet).
Zu dem
A quick reality check: forget scraping stuff from FB or any other
commercial operator of similar services (for legal/ToS reasons).
And second: there is already the OSM forums which, depending on region,
are quite popular.
Further: none-of the above are really a replacement for a integrated
Ich will nicht Dietmar vorgreifen, aber die Strassenlistenauswertung hat
ja keine Geometrien aus den staatlichen Listen. Sprich die Leute
kopieren mit Sicherheit von google.
Simon
Am 15.10.2015 um 18:18 schrieb Michael Reichert:
> Hallo Dietmar, hallo Liste,
>
> in der Straßenlistenauswertung
No, I'm not going to tell you who to vote for in the elections :-).
However I believe there is some substantial misunderstanding of the
numbers involved.
Martijn noted in his manifesto that the daily editors numbers was flat
for the US and Michael used that as one of the corner points in his
The issue is that the notifications are sent by mail and as such may
easily disappear somewhere .
See https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/908
Am 12.10.2015 um 14:57 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
> Hi,
> i have a response of a user who said that he did not get any comment on
Am 12.10.2015 um 23:43 schrieb Mr. Stace D Maples:
> ..
> Neither of the projects was scrapped because we /couldn’t/ use OSM for
> the project, but because we couldn’t determine IF WE COULD use OSM for
> our particular uses.
>
> ...
And you or your legal department approached the licensor of
Could we please get back on topic?
Neither the pros and cons of share-alike, nor use cases in which the
data is not publicly used, nor alternative licensing schemes, nor
mumbo-jumbo from conference sessions is the subject of this discussion.
Please feel free to discuss any of the above in
For those readers that are not well versed with wikis, I just wanted to
point out that some points have been raised on the discussion page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_Metadata_Guideline
I personally would prefer if feedback was given here, but obviously
using the
our data is not subject to
> sharealike as
> > ~~defined in the “Horizontal Layers” guideline. Note this is a
> > ~~hypothetical use case and not an actual one.~~
>
> I recommend striking the paragraph above: This statement doesn't
> clearly flow
> from the ODbL
Tom, any feedback yet?
Simon
Am 14.07.2015 um 16:22 schrieb Tom Lee:
> I'll add that I've been in touch with CC's US affiliate and they've
> expressed interest in resolving the compatibility question (either
> with formal guidance that applies to 4.0 or in preparation for the
> next license
Am 06.10.2015 um 08:55 schrieb Peter Dobratz:
...
a lot of stuff I was just going to write :-)
...
In any case, I believe it is important not to get trapped in the "old"
way of doing things. For the majority* of edits the "modern" (excluding
on device editing which actually works fine) way is
Besides having all the issues Keypadmapper has squared, how do you
prevent IP leakage from google to OSM? For example do you know if it
employs any "lock on road" or similar technology?
Simon
Am 06.10.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Adam Franco:
> For trail surveys and other GPS recording on Android I've
The error just means that you have no SW/plugin or whatever installed
that understand geo URIs (they are used a lot on mobile devices). In
other words if you don't need them to work, you can safely ignore the issue.
Simon
Am 05.10.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Dave F.:
> Hi
>
> Map main page. Under the
I think you are clearly illustrating why we are wary of opening the can
of worms bending the definitions of the ODbL creates.
So now we not only have to take the leap of faith that geo-coding
creates a produced work*, we have to expand the definition of
substantive to allow essentially complete
IMHO you are approaching this -slightly- wrong.
In general the play store will not offer you apps that will not run on
your system, so there is on the one hand either something wrong with the
play store configuration if the version intentionally doesn't work with
2.3.6 -> you should be talking
is accidental.
Simon
Am 24.09.2015 um 00:32 schrieb Alex Barth:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
> <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:
>
> it might actually force
> such a service provider to differentiate between geo-coding fo
My understanding of the trivial transformation guideline is that the
data in the nominatim instance would fall under it (so you are not
obliged to supply somebody that asks with a dump of your nominatim
database or your osm2pgsql rendering database etc etc, you can simply
point to the original
Am 23.09.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Tom Lee:
>
> why wouldn't you want to provide OSM with a list of addresses that
> you tried to geo-code (successfully and non-successfully)
>
>
> To use an extreme but hopefully illustrative example, consider the
> queries used to create the thematic map on
Am 23.09.2015 um 19:16 schrieb Tom Lee:
> I'm not sure what basis there is for thinking a service provider will
> necessarily reuse clients' data. Maybe!
Not "maybe" but dead certain, see for example geocoder.ca and I hope you
don't really believe that google doesn't reuse the data you submit to
Am 23.09.2015 um 01:26 schrieb Alex Barth:
> ..
>
> The Fairhurst Doctrine won't get us all the way on geocoding. It still
> leaves open what happens in scenarios where elements of the same kind
> in third party databases are geocoded with OSM data and others with
> third party data. This is
Am 22.09.2015 um 22:14 schrieb alyssa wright:
> What does this mean? "uses ratings from OSM "
>
Again: it is just a hypothetical example.
Obviously using a real life use case and declaring that as
non-conformant or whatever in a not yet agreed to guideline would not be
sensible (just imagine
Naturally musings about hypothetical better worlds in which OSM has a
different licence (and in which we undoubtedly would be having exactly
the same discussions) are just as off topic in this thread as
stipulations that company XYZ is violating the licence.
Could we pls have some comments on
I've added a clarification to the example in question as it is causing
some contention.
Simon
Am 22.09.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
> Am 22.09.2015 um 22:14 schrieb alyssa wright:
>> What does this mean? "uses ratings from OSM "
>>
> Again: it
Am 22.09.2015 um 11:05 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> Is there a problem with the current license? Is it not clear from a
> legal point of view, how it should be interpreted?
Please read the introduction to the proposed guideline.
>
> I must admit I feel some reluctance towards the practise
Am 21.09.2015 um 14:01 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>
> I don't believe that the restaurant star rating is a good example, as
> we don't rate restaurants ourselves,
I'm using a hypothetical, but "in principle could be possible" example
on purpose for the negative scenario.
> and copying the
Dear All
One of the big grey areas remaining wrt our distribution licence is
defining if, and how you can link from external data to an OpenStreetMap
derived dataset. Nailing this down is, in my opinion, key to progress in
getting rid of other areas of contention (for example geo-coding).
In the
Over the years the expectation has been that somebody would take OSM
data and create such an end user portal, but as we know, that has never
happened outside a couple of aborted or zombie projects (three that come
to mind are MapQuest, bing and skobbler, but I'm sure there have been more).
I
Hi Steve
Before this discussion goes off on a tangent, which version of CC-by are
they currently using?
Simon
Am 30.08.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Steve Bennett:
> Hi all,
> I've been trying to convince the state government of Victoria
> (southeast Australia) to allow their VicMap raw data to be
Simone, you are flogging a really dead horse (which has been discussed
many many many times before).
- the licence of the GADM dataset is incompatible with OSM
- in dire circumstances and with a very large effort, as Paul has
pointed out, three and a half years ago I managed to get hold of the
Am 25.08.2015 um 20:14 schrieb Tom Lee:
The main point is however that while we can pontificate as much as we
want that something might be legal in country X, Y or Z, it doesn't
really matter: for OSM to be useful in a country (and our goal is to be
useful in as many countries as possible,
Wer ist wir in deinem Blogartikel?
Am 04.08.2015 um 09:46 schrieb Elstermann, Mike:
Auflösung einer Grauzone:
https://geoobserver.wordpress.com/2015/08/04/datenschutz-geodaten/
Der geoObserver
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Potentially an argument could be made for
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turning_radius
While it is true that in principle this could be derived from the way
geometry, in reality for the use case for which the tag was designed,
the geometry is typically not available in enough detail (in
We've typically never made a fuss about formalities (aka in triplicate
and signed with blood :-)) and as long as it is clear who is giving the
permission and in which role, I suspect we would be happy with an e-mail
version (extra points if digitally signed).
Simon
signature.asc
Description:
I suspect the problem is not quite as large as you think it might be.
If they want to use a public licence, while it may not be actually
explicitly said anywhere, CC0 or the PDDL are naturally totally acceptable.
For one offs/special permission I would suggest using
Ich würde mich an deiner Stelle zuerst mal selber an der Nase nehmen und
ein Proxy für den WMS-Dienst einrichten und den im Imagery-Index
eintragen, so dass er auch von iD Benutzern verwendet werden kann.
Und dann noch den Newbies in NRW am 1. Tag einen netten Begrüssungsmail
schicken und du hast
this as a replacement till such a time that we have a completely redone
policy.
Simon
Am 16.06.2015 um 13:17 schrieb Simon Poole:
And now for something completely different.
I've produced an updated version of the OSM privacy policy:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Updated_Privacy_Policy (the original
Am 17.07.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
...
Und die Unterstellung, dass ich nicht recherchiert hätte, ist hier denke
ich weder korrekt noch hilfreich. Ich kenne eine Reihe von Statements
vom OSMF-Vorstand zur Lizenz und Attributierung, aber was ich unter
einer 'deutlichen
Am 17.07.2015 um 11:57 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
...
Von wem soll so eine deutlichere Haltung kommen? Zunächst von der OSMF
natürlich (wenngleich eine klare und deutliche Haltung von dort zu
irgendeinem Thema vermutlich illusorisch ist).
Wenn du recheriert hättest, hättest du mehrere
Am 17.07.2015 um 02:30 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo:
But I actually don't want to play that game. I'd rather do my best to
let Eircode flop as hard as possible (amongst others by ignoring it in
OSM) so that in a few years time the government and/or a coalition of
geocoding users decide to
Ich hatte mal so eine Liste angefangen (da es wirklich viele Fälle
waren), da aber ziemlich bald darauf MapBox die Quellenhinweis- Mechanik
umgebaut hat und es anschliessend deutlich besser wurde, nicht
weiterverfolgt.
Ich halte das ganze nicht für irgendwie bösartig gemeint, sondern es
sind halt
read the Eircode off their business card.
On 17 July 2015 11:30:55 GMT+01:00, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
What better way to ignore than come to the conclusion that the data
can't be included in OSM and needs to be removed when it turns up?
Whatever the merits or de-merits
Hi all
Congrats or not on the introduction of eircode system :-), there is
naturally some insecurity as to if we can legally include the data in
OSM from user contributions.
It would be helpful if somebody could provide the text of the letter you
received with your eircode to the LWG, and
an extra permission for that be required?
Best Regards.
Ivan.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
mailto:si...@poole.ch wrote:
Ivan
The problem is that it is a legal can of worms. I would suggest simply
asking for explicit permission, or at least formal
Ivan
The problem is that it is a legal can of worms. I would suggest simply
asking for explicit permission, or at least formal confirmation that
tracing from the imagery does not create a derivative work and that the
government has no rights in such vectorized data.
It is, as you may have seen
There was an event of some kind at 20:00 BST which led to a number of
machines rebooting and other not so good stuff, it is being looked in to.
Simon
Am 12.07.2015 um 22:20 schrieb Walter Nordmann:
Hi, about 2 hours ago the osmosis replpcation using planet minute diffs seems
to be broken.
Replcation has been back for a while, ramoth didn't come back up on its
own and had to be booted by Tom.
Simon
Am 12.07.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Simon Poole:
There was an event of some kind at 20:00 BST which led to a number of
machines rebooting and other not so good stuff, it is being looked
Wird man dann sehen ... ansonsten sind die Bilder von Mapbox meistens
ein guter Ersatz (in beiden Fällen stammen ja die Aufnahmen von
DigitalGlobe und Mapbox scheint sie etwas besser zu pflegen).
Simon
Am 30.06.2015 um 22:09 schrieb Eifelhunde:
Können wir das weiter benutzen wenn BING
Am 29.06.2015 um 17:00 schrieb John Bergmayer:
On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:55:08 +0200, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
A condition of having a valid licence to use OSM data is providing a
suitable way of pointing out the conditions of use of said data to your
users/customers/etc (which
Well the more basic question is: would you in the end have a marketable
product that you could sell in places where people actually have money?
And the answer is likely no.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
legal-talk
Am 28.06.2015 um 08:34 schrieb Jo:
...
As far as the datatypes go, I would be all in favor for the area
datatype. I hear a lot of talk about it, and I don't understand why it
doesn't materialise. While we're at it, we should 'formalise' a few more
of the things we now use relations for.
are enshrined in the following places:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines
Simon
Am 27.06.2015 um 10:23 schrieb Richard Fairhurst:
Simon Poole wrote:
As the name of this list says
Am 18.06.2015 um 18:16 schrieb Greg Troxel:
Simon Poole si...@poole.ch writes:
I've produced an updated version of the OSM privacy policy:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Updated_Privacy_Policy (the original
resides here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Privacy_Policy).
I have
Am 27.06.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Tom Lee:
But of course OSM extracts and snapshots are available all over the web,
and from interfaces that don't introduce or even mention any contractual
relationship with OSMF as a condition of download (whether the user is
an OSM contributor or has
Jan Erik
As the name of this list says it is legal talk (aka yapping without
consequence) ... not get-help-from-the-OSMF. The proper places to
address are plastered all over openstreetmap.org and osmfoundation.org:
le...@osmfoundation.org (policy issues and similar) or
Die Tiles sind von gravitystorm aka Andy Alan .. ich stupf ihn mal.
Simon
Am 26.06.2015 um 11:29 schrieb Michael Paulmann:
Hallo!
Ich habe openlandscapemap auf Gaia GPS entdeckt und die Karte wird immer ohne
unseren Lizenzhinweis verwendet. Wie weisst man die Betreiber jetzt darauf
hin
Am 26.06.2015 um 16:55 schrieb Tom Lee:
As the name of this list says it is legal talk (aka yapping
without consequence) ... not get-help-from-the-OSMF
I'm sorry to see this practice discouraged. The archive description[1]
says this is the list for discussion of all legal matters relating
Am 26.06.2015 um 16:55 schrieb Tom Lee:
... As I noted elsewhere[2], EU and US law don't seem to
make database IDs eligible for copyright (or associated license
requirements), at least when their reproduction is associated with the
lawful use of the relevant database. So I think
Historisch war Datenschutz in der Deutschen Community immer ein heisses
Thema, deshalb einen speziellen Verweis auf
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-June/073347.html
hier.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 16.06.2015 um 01:40 schrieb Clifford Snow:
Following this thread makes me wonder how people feel about some of the
issues raised. The link below is quick survey about some of the issues
raised in the thread. Please take a minute or two to respond. If I get
sufficient answers I will
And now for something completely different.
I've produced an updated version of the OSM privacy policy:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Updated_Privacy_Policy (the original
resides here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Privacy_Policy).
This is largely a private undertaking, it however has
Am 15.06.2015 um 11:37 schrieb Lester Caine:
...
All that is lacking is that other apps go to OSMAND rather than trying
to get google maps running ... which only works with a network link?
...
We're really getting substantially off topic now.
Apps on android in general don't have
contributors are?
Is the issue that people doubt the usefulness of the remotely mapped
data? That we don't really believe in our own success?
-Kate
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
mailto:si...@poole.ch wrote:
Am 15.06.2015 um 04:11 schrieb Robert
Am 15.06.2015 um 22:18 schrieb Arun Ganesh:
Not at all. I'm asking a contributor who feels that his local
community is not very strong if there's anything specific he thinks
could improve things.
The very simple answer is that most people who know English and can
afford a smartphone
Am 15.06.2015 um 04:11 schrieb Robert Banick:
...
Remote mapping was easier to set up in the early phases of the project
and much more accessible to the Western “core” of OSM contributors, not
to mention sympathetic journalists, who wanted to check out and perhaps
contribute to the
Am 14.06.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Kate Chapman:
Possibly, but we cite as fact that imports stunt community growth. I
don't think that has ever been proven in a way that cuts across
cultures, geographies or the quality of the data being imported. People
usually point to the TIGER import in the
I think little can be said against careful, respectful mapping of base
infrastructure (aka major road and other transportation facilities), as
far as possible with input from the local inhabitants, particularly in
the case of emergencies, by harnessing the combined prowess of OSM mappers.
As had
Am 14.06.2015 um 19:33 schrieb Kate Chapman:
I should point out that none of the above is in any way new, just
conveniently ignored.
Not ignored, I'm just not sure it is solid enough evidence to justify
for or against imports worldwide.
If we can't extrapolate from the
601 - 700 of 1554 matches
Mail list logo
