Re: [Talk-us] Talk-us Digest, Vol 108, Issue 18

;value added" features of the OpenStreetMap Nominatim service. The service uses additional GIS boundaries besides OSM data for the search results. Hence, "Building 2886, Absher Road, New Eden, Osceola County, Florida, 34771-9208, United States of America". Regards, Greg _

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

Hi all, The OSM data for the FHRS comparison tool > hasn’t been updated for a few days because – as Robert Whittaker mentioned – the Geofabrik extract hasn’t been updated in that time. You can of course

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

Dear all, The FHRS/OSM comparison tool > has some new features which should help with the Autumn Quarterly Project

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

ing issue for displaying at the bottom of each page the age of the OSM data used <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/4 <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/4>>. Best wishes, Greg > On 10 Nov 2016, at 16:48, Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> w

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

e also modified most links so that they open in a new tab/window by default as it seems more useful to be able to keep the map view open in the original tab/window. Thanks, Greg > On 16 Oct 2016, at 22:22, Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for providing this t

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

es you to the FHRS page <http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/71808/> (N.B. the FHRS ID is therefore 71808) and you can copy the address details into OSM. Hope that helps. Thanks, Greg > On 6 Nov 2016, at 15:29, Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> wrote: > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

The problem with Birmingham, Glasgow and Leeds only having max. 5000 FHRS establishments is now fixed. <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/22> Happy mapping! Greg > On 6 Nov 2016, at 14:11, Greg <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > T

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

ssible. You can follow its progress on GitHub: <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/21>. You can continue to use the tool but the data was last updated on Tuesday morning rather than this morning. Thanks, Greg On 30/09/16 17:11, Brian Prangle wrote: > Hi everyon

Re: [Talk-transit] Naming concepts

"Roger Slevin" writes: > I have watched this debate over the years - and I keep coming back to > what I think is a key question for the OSM community ... if there is > an existing robust standard for public transport information, then is > it really worth trying to add to

Re: [Talk-transit] Naming concepts

Stephen Sprunk writes: > I should point out that "bus lines", "cruise lines", "air lines", > etc. are plural when talking about one company (e.g. American > Airlines) because they operate a collection of individual lines > between specific locations, such as New York-Los

Re: [Talk-transit] Naming concepts

Felix Delattre writes: > I also like them. Thanks, Jo! > But isn't "line" an European wording? Would an English native speaker > intuitively understand the concepts of "line" and "itinerary"? I always For me (en_US), I find it awkward. > thought a "line" is more

Re: [Talk-transit] Naming concepts

signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Re: [Talk-transit] Naming concepts

Felix Delattre writes: > There are different concepts of routes in OpenStreetMap and GTFS. > Sometimes they are not existent or ambiguous. I am a native speaker of en_US. > 1. A general public transport service (e.g. No. 38): > In OSM: "route_master" in GTFS: "route"

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

the graphs, you can find the RMarkdown code on GitHub here: [https://github.com/gregrs-uk/fhrs-osm-stats <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/fhrs-osm-stats>] Thanks, Greg. > On 29 Oct 2016, at 13:17, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > Hi Greg > > The first

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

suggestions. The graphs have been created using freely available software (R and RStudio) so if anyone would like access to the code, please let me know and I can pop it on GitHub. Thanks, Greg > On 18 Oct 2016, at 20:28, Greg <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > I’ve

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

, the districts with the most recent progress, the number of districts with zero matches and how that has changed, and the number of districts with certain levels of completeness (i.e. a histogram). Watch this space! Thanks, Greg > On 18 Oct 2016, at 19:31, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

have to put the address details into JOSM manually, but you could use the FHRS links on nearby blue dots to find these. Thanks, Greg > On 16 Oct 2016, at 22:22, Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for providing this tool, Greg. I've found it very useful so fa

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

These district statistics CSV files will now be copied each day to http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs-stats/ <http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs-stats/>, so there will be a file per day in case anyone would like to track progress. Thanks, Greg > On 9 Oct 2016, at 21:00,

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

; once the tool runs this evening. Thanks, Greg > On 4 Oct 2016, at 17:58, Greg <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote: > > In case it's useful for tracking, you can get the full list of tags used > by my comparison tool at the link below. The tool downloads nodes/ways > with th

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

in the table at the bottom of each district page that don't match with the FHRS database). Thanks, Greg. On 02/10/16 22:19, Neil Matthews wrote: >> 1.We have a great tool > <http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/>developed some time ago by > gregrs, whose work we shoul

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

with an fhrs:id and any nodes/ways with one of the tags listed here: https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/blob/master/filter-osm.sh#L5-L13) Thanks, Greg ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

In case it's useful for tracking, you can get the full list of tags used by my comparison tool at the link below. The tool downloads nodes/ways with those tags and any nodes/ways with an fhrs:id tag set. https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/blob/master/filter-osm.sh#L5-L13 Thanks, Greg

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

suggestions in one place in case I get some time (possible in late October / early November). Thanks, Greg On 02/10/16 22:19, Neil Matthews wrote: > Tool looks good, but is there any way to get a feature request: to > identify items in the fhrs data that don't match to OSM in a

Re: [Talk-us] Bar vs Pub vs Restaurant in the US?

Andrew Wiseman writes: > On Thursday, September 29, 2016, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > >> I think that you're all overthinking it, and trying to fit a European >> square into a US circle. First of all, the US doesn't have pubs, unless the >> owner is specifically

Re: [Talk-us] Bar vs Pub vs Restaurant in the US?

Harald Kliems <kli...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:17 PM Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> wrote: > >> >> That's not what the OSM tag means; it's more european. In OSM, "cafe" >> means (usually) that there is real food, but (always)

Re: [Talk-us] Bar vs Pub vs Restaurant in the US?

Jeffrey Ollie writes: > Third, the laws/regulations around liquor licenses are complex for various > historical and political reasons and vary state by state and probably even > city by city. What classifies as a bar in one state might be a restaurant > in another. Agreed that

Re: [Talk-us] Bar vs Pub vs Restaurant in the US?

Andrew Wiseman writes: > The wiki uses a European context, so here's my attempt at classifying what > is what in the US. Let me know what you think. I mostly agree; comments on details. > To me, a "pub" in the US would be bars that have food, but the food isn't > the main

Re: [Talk-us] MassGIS Road Import - Lanes

Bill Ricker writes: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Spencer Gardner > wrote: >> Is anyone on here familiar with the process that was used to upload MassGIS >> road data for the state of Massachusetts? I'm noticing a lot of incorrect >> lane

Re: [Talk-us] MassGIS Road Import - Lanes

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Greg Morgan <dr.kludge...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't live there but Mapillary user marc has nice coverage for some of > the roads in question[1]. I am _guessing_ that a formula was developed > based on the width value that Massgis had in thei

Re: [Talk-us] MassGIS Road Import - Lanes

I don't live there but Mapillary user marc has nice coverage for some of the roads in question[1]. I am _guessing_ that a formula was developed based on the width value that Massgis had in their data. Looking at Mapillary while in JOSM, it almost looks like there is a one off error or a condition

Re: [Talk-GB] Summer quarterly project

, or to add feature requests to the issue tracker there, that way I can make the most of any time I do have to improve the code. Thanks, Greg. On 13/09/16 15:55, Dave F wrote: > I'd vote for fhrs:id as the next project. I'm about half way through for > my LA. (I also like Greg's trigpoint da

Re: [Talk-us] Mappers in Idaho!

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:49 AM, OSM Volunteer stevea < stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote: > I wanted to chime in my great enthusiasm for Greg Morgan helping or > leading a good, chunky data effort in OSM like this. Greg took on the USBR > 90 effort in Arizona, hundreds and hu

Re: [Talk-us] Deleting / Closing / Renaming all places in a chain

263809986326706=-111.81125590160123=8.272711628984965 Woot! Woot! Elliot, I'd say go for the change. You are only going to __potentially__ remove 130 names from OSM objects. Better yet, rename the name to a note tag, with an explanation that the place was shutdown because of sanc

Re: [Talk-us] Deleting / Closing / Renaming all places in a chain

Frederik Ramm writes: > Hi, > > On 09/07/2016 02:48 AM, Mike N wrote: >> But if one less >> thing is wrong or outdated, that makes the data more useful to all clients. > > Except those humans who could have used that outdated thing as a marker > to tell them that the map

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

/groups/trigonomy/info as another source of flush bracket numbers, but I haven’t asked them about licensing, nor have I contacted anyone from the Trigpointing website at this stage. Thanks, Greg. > On 2 Sep 2016, at 00:05, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > Co

Re: [Talk-GB] Tools for using Food Hygiene data e.g. quickly adding addresses/postcodes

https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/5 <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/5> again Thanks, Greg.___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Tools for using Food Hygiene data e.g. quickly adding addresses/postcodes

. Thanks, Greg. P.S. I’m not on Twitter but I believe someone tweeted @drsiant about my code. She probably won’t have seen the latest link for the entire of GB though so feel free to share it! > On 2 Sep 2016, at 12:38, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > and have y

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

be obtained here: [http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org]. Thanks, Greg. On Fri, Aug 19, 2016, at 08:08 PM, Greg wrote: > I'm pleased to say that I have had confirmation from Ordnance Survey > that their triangulation station data can be used under the Open > Government Licence v3. I have d

[Talk-GB] Tools for using Food Hygiene data e.g. quickly adding addresses/postcodes

/python-fhrs-osm] Thanks, Greg. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

> mapping the road markings seems extremely strange - what if they are very > faded, when do we map them ? is there a threshold of % of the paint left ? > what is there are no road markings but there are signs ? I encouraged MapBox to add some of their workflow information to the wiki page.[1]

[Talk-ca] Prince Edward County - Sandbanks.

drains the East Lake into Lake Ontario, so it too needs splitting. Thanks. ..greg ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

and the large number of 'man_made=survey_point's already in the database in order to determine whether it might be feasible/useful to import/merge the data. It looks like similar data has been imported from IGN in France. Of course I won't do this until it's been properly discussed. Thanks, Greg

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

Thanks David. I have contacted OS using the contact form on their website in the hope that they may publish the data under the OGL. I think it would be helpful in accurately determining imagery offset. Thanks, Greg. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 09:00 PM, David Woolley wrote: > On 16/08/16 15

[Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

an angle (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Drawing_of_simple_building_outlines). Best wishes, Greg. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-us] Mappers in Idaho!

nd the like. The great open places[2] like Top Of The World [3] are more important than a mapathon. Regards, Greg [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/38.25104/-112.64784 [2] https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/drkludge?lat=44.9747045=-109.4556432=17=TkS55trFermdh6Dx2sf5Jg=photo=true [3] ht

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Proposing import of sidewalk data Seattle, WA, USA

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Greg Morgan <dr.kludge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> look at the recent turn lane work that MapBox is performing. They >> have done a wonderful job of finding issu

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Proposing import of sidewalk data Seattle, WA, USA

> Again this seems to be is the "I'm waiting for someone else to do something" > line. If you want a map rendering that shows stop signs, create one, like I I am not standing in any line. If I find an issue that I don't think has been addressed or the original author did not understand is an

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Proposing import of sidewalk data Seattle, WA, USA

I'd like to build on the Washington data that will be developed. https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/wiki/Mapping-guide-for-turn-lanes-from-imagery https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/wiki/QA-for-turn-lane-data Thank you Meg. Regards, Greg ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Kansas City addresses from maps.kcmo.org

Clifford Snow writes: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:02 PM, teslas_moustache < > teslas_mousta...@riseup.net> wrote: > >> I'm not sure if property lines and ownership are useful. And I don't >> think that building outlines are included, so I may need to continue >> with

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=crossing tags removed in changeset.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > On 19/07/2016 14:01, Greg Morgan wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> ...Two w

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=crossing tags removed in changeset.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > On 16/07/2016 07:20, Greg Morgan wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Alejandro S. <alejandro...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> Looks

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Status and progress: NYS DEC Lands reimport

Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > On this particular issue I believe you should use different tagging. > Currently there is almost no use of access=permit > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/access=permit > Typically if you require a permission for access it is "private"

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=crossing tags removed in changeset.

gin with? How about clarifying the wiki page before accusing someone of an automated edit? How about let's congratulate Wynndale on a brave attempt at map gardening in such a hostile environment? Regards, Greg ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

[replying to the thread in general] I tend to be nervous about groups that are structurally like the DWG. However, when I look at what they've done over the years I've been involved, and the notion of the automated edits code, I have to say the DWG has seemed 100% reasonable and if anything

Re: [Talk-us] Common names of highways do not match road signs.

Paul Johnson writes: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Kevin Morgan > wrote: > >> It is confusing to use open street maps in my area(Central Ohio) for >> driving directions since the "common names" of high ways do not match >> road signs. The

Re: [Talk-us] NYC DEC Lands reimport

Kevin Kenny writes: > I used leisure=nature_reserve and boundary=protected_area > protect_class=1b for these six areas. The appearance therefore > changes. If you want it to change back, convince me that there's a > consensus that landuse=forest would not be tagging

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > sent from a phone > >> Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 12:04, Tomas Straupis >> ha scritto: >> >> My main point is to get back to reservoir/basin being tagged as "landuse" > > > why would that be desirable?

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed import cleanup: NYSDEClands

Kevin Kenny writes: > landuse=conservation is formally deprecated. This is the real bug. There should be a set of landuse= tags that are jointly exhaustive and mutually exclusive and this one is obviously missing. It describes exactly what you are trying to

Re: [Talk-us] Best practices for dealing with old TIGER tags?

Eric Ladner <eric.lad...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:58 AM Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: > >> >> Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > OK, 'residential' if it looks like 'subdivision', 'unclassifie

Re: [Talk-us] Best practices for dealing with old TIGER tags?

Kevin Kenny writes: > OK, 'residential' if it looks like 'subdivision', 'unclassified' > otherwise (as long as it's drivable in, say, my daughter's car rather > than my 4-wheeler). Got it. I also see a distinction between residential/unclassified as denoting a

Re: [Talk-us] How are US county boundaries legally defined?

Jake writes: > US mappers - do any of you know what government body is the keeper of truth > for Missouri county boundaries? I don't, but I would call the state GIS or highway departments and ask. It is likely that the country boundaries are defined in state statute and

Re: [Talk-us] Timezones in USA?

Frederik Ramm writes: > I have deleted a couple of such time zone polygons account of not being > verifiable on the ground. > > I don't know how time zones are defined "at the source" but it is very > unlikely that someone puts up signs. I guess there'll be some kind of >

Re: [Talk-us] Restoring bus routes in Portland

ll have to download more data before moving nodes. That way you see other ways attached to the nodes. 3.) Deleting nodes also requires more data. You have to see the whole context with additional downloads of data. Regards, Greg ___ Talk-us mailin

Re: [OSM-talk] Craigslist

I'd report the issue as a rendering bug to CL and leave out the reflection issue. Regards, Greg ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-us] Tagging National Forests

s between the trees. Hence, some of these boundary=protected_areas in Arizona are forests but not like the expectation of natural=wood or landuse=forest in other parts of the country. ;-) Regards, Greg [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:protect%20class?uselang=en-US [2] http://wiki.openstreet

Re: [Talk-us] Improving coverage of exit numbers and destinations on motorways

e users to become mappers, then there has to be a reward on the main OSM site. Otherwise, OSM has developed the most boring video game that shows no lights nor rings any bells. It is the cartographers and not the importers that are killing off mappers! Regards, Greg [0] https://gist.github.com/poornibadrin

Re: [OSM-talk] Crowdfunding for OpenStreetMap in Bénin : 275km² high resolution satellite imagery for Cotonou by 1-May 2016!

utions. Well then, it might be smart for Digital Globe, Mapbox, or another organization to setup a crowdfunding section of their websites. A 501C section of the said firms could collect money to fund some of these efforts without the overhead of crowd funding sites. The reward would b

Re: [Talk-us] Optimal / preferred checkin sizes

whole pointless issue of arm chair mapping verses survey mapping is removed from the joy of mapping! Remember: have fun! Mapping takes you into the spatial part of your brain. The logical side of your brain takes a rest. That is the best part of mapping. Regards, Greg

Re: [Talk-us] Optimal / preferred checkin sizes

"Steve Friedl" writes: > I don't think that 3 square miles of road straightening ought to go in a > single [enormous] batch, but I'm not sure that 100 entries of the form > 'Straightened Main Street in MyTown" / "Straightened Elm Street in MyTown" / > "Straightened Euclid

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Tools for Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) data

Hi Rob, Thanks for the kind words. I'd be happy for you to post it to Mappa Mercia. Best wishes, Greg. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Hi Greg, > cc talk-gb (certainly helpful to post there). > > This looks great. One that would benefit the wider

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Tools for Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) data

intervals. The code and software it uses (Python and PostGIS) are freely available though and I'm happy to help someone get it up and running. Thanks, Greg. On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Brian Prangle wrote: > Hi Greg > Fantastic resource!  Thanks for your effort here. I'll start

Re: [Talk-us] OSM attribution on website store locator pages

provided the CL map because it has the proper attribution. Again thank you for the response. Regards, Greg > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Greg Morgan <dr.kludge...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Martijn van Exel <m...

Re: [Talk-us] OSM attribution on website store locator pages

e published for potential clients, OpenStreetMap would like attribution for potential future mappers. I added their email to the list. They would have to join the list to respond, etc. However, they should be able to pick up the drift from this email chain. Regards, Greg > To my mind i

Re: [Talk-us] Talk-us Digest, Vol 101, Issue 10

proceed. There are many mappers cheering on your efforts. Regards, Greg Morgan Brentwood Historic District https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124871379#map=17/33.46098/-112.04512 [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/33.41555/-112.04048 _

Re: [OSM-talk] RfD notification: Purge tag "priority" from tracks

because a number of us rail fans in the US are looking at European tag models for the vast railway network that we are piecing together. http://www.openrailwaymap.org/ looks like the only way to show cases all the features of rail changes. Will there be an imp

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Le formulaire de recherche OSMand ignore la grande majorité des villes françaises

Je suis intéressé pour bricoler un moyen de chercher une adresse pour Android, mais j'avoue qu'en l'état, la base de données est grosse (1.2Gio) et la moindre recherche prend entre 20 et 25 secondes sur un ordi de bureau. Je pense donc proposer différents ensembles de données, avec en priorité

Re: [OSM-talk] [BOT] [RFC]: water surfaces

at > 56 CanVec 6.0 - NRCan > 57 IRS > 63 NRCan-CanVec-8.0 >118 landsat >121 Bing >123 NRCan-CanVec-7.0 >437 Kartverket N50 >802 NRCan-CanVec-10.0 > 1476 > 1708 NHD > The importers that provided me all the NHD data are my heroes.

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Slack

. In the scheme of things Twitter's big data engine made the connections. Now these kids believe I am part of Anonymous taking down ISIS. LOL!!! Since I told this story two selectors at the NSA building have been activated. Thank you. You are welcome! Regards, Greg On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:14 PM

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Slack

Emacs plugins for Slack so that the Vim/Emacs editor war can continue on to World War 100. >>>:->>>>> Regards, Greg [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2016-April/016114.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2016-April/016115.htm

Re: [Talk-us] Communications manager

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: > On 4/1/2016 12:22 AM, Greg Morgan wrote: > >> I would think that the US Board should add another board member to be a >> communications manager. I now understand why corporations have paid

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Slack

I just don't have enough cycles to use it. More importantly, I need to have time to contribute at least one change set a day big or small. That's that way I can set out to rule the world each day just like Pinky and the Brain. ;-) Regards, Greg Greg -- this is great. Thank you so much for

Re: [Talk-us] Fwd: Re: [OSM-talk] Slack

Charlotte Wolter writes: > Really nice discussion of the issues around using for-profit tools > in an open-source organization. The for-profit point isn't really the core issue. IMHO the big issues are the use of non-Free software on servers the use of

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Kevin Kenny writes: > This isn't a matter of "get off my lawn." It's a matter of "there's no > promise that there's a path there at all." I think you're making a separate argument, that when there's some maybe-path that's indistinct, and not clearly followable, then

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Alan McConchie writes: > Thanks everyone for your strong but sincere criticism so far. In the > thread here on talk-us, I explained _what_ we were trying to do, but I > didn't explain very much about our rationale: _why_ we think this is > an important idea. The wiki

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag" of social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to look and register opposition, unless they are more opposed to wikifiddling than to this tag :-) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Social_path

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Mike Thompson writes: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: > >> They tagged them as "social_path", according to their blog entry [1] >> > Totally unacceptable. OpenStreetMap maps what is observable on the ground > (generally). If

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Boston, MA, USA addr:housenumber Import

Jason Remillard writes: > The licensing link says the following, it is kind of weird. indeed. > "The City of Boston recognizes the value and benefit gained by sharing > GIS data. Although the City has made reasonable efforts to provide > accurate data, the City

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Boston, MA, USA addr:housenumber Import

I should point out that I'm not opposed to this import or address imports in general; generally, I am supportive. But, I think the doing an import right is vastly harder than someone who hasn't been through one thinks, and that it's good to iterate on approach and data quality, and not rush or

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Boston, MA, USA addr:housenumber Import

Roman Yepishev writes: > The wiki now contains updated files that set the postcode and add > a fixme tag to a building in case it already had the number that does > not match the official information from SAM. How many fixme tags would there be? How many of these fixme

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Boston, MA, USA addr:housenumber Import

Clifford Snow writes: > 4) Is it really necessary to upload that many notes during the import? if a > building is missing, can you add a node with the address information > instead of leaving a note? I am opposed to adding notes from bulk data. There are already a

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging Piers vs Docks

Clifford Snow writes: > Unfortunately those trained in nautical matters is quite small. Most are > like me, a dock is something you walk out on from the shore. In some parts > of the country the docks are removed in the winter others are there > permanently. Agreed

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging Piers vs Docks

Malcolm Herring writes: > On 11/03/2016 17:15, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: >> By the way, we recently had a discussion on tagging@osm >> about quay, pier etc. : > > That discussion was about the various mooring structures. The OP > refers to the

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:58 PM, alyssa wright > wrote: > >> We're also accepting nominations for next year's OSM US pet mascot. > > > I nominate me ! > Paul,

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing through access=delivery

again. --Greg Knisely On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 7:00 AM, <talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > Send talk mailing list submissions to > talk@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/li

Re: [Talk-us] evacuation_center=yes

Blake Girardot writes: > What tags are we using in the US for disaster evacuation centers for > like hurricanes and things? > > http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/evacuation_center#map > > Shows none in the US but I know we have a lot. > > I am looking for the right tag to use but

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Fun] OpenRandomMap

Je trouve le principe rigolo, surtout avec des résultats comme celui-ci : http://www.kirikoo.net/images/14Anonyme-20160123-143855.png Des intéressés pour construire quelque chose dessus ? 2016-01-23 14:10 GMT+01:00 PanierAvide : > Bonjour à tous, > > Le projet

Re: [Talk-us] Smartphone App that searches OSM addresses?

with Mapillary on my primary phone yet still have map coverage with the second phone. Regards, Greg On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Mike N <nice...@att.net> wrote: > In the case where a county completely revamps its road network and > addressing scheme for E911 purposes, then authorizes its road

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim weakness

malenki writes: > Do you realize that the map usually shows the region you did look at > last? This may not necessarily be the region you want to have searched > at thus making a "search on displayed map" quite useless. > Sure looking at the location of the users IP address may

Re: [Talk-us] York County South Carolina

unning a program to change the database" vs "human editing" that the bar becomes far higher. Greg signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] SunCertPathBuilderException

Checking the certificate[1] via a web browser says that the certificate for https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/StartupPage is valid from ‎Friday, ‎December ‎09, ‎2016 1:37:29 PM until 12/9/2016. If you haven't used this computer for awhile you might check your JOSM version. I had no problems

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >