Matija Nalis mnalis-openstreetmapl...@... writes:
Nama osobno sigurno ne bi, pitanje je da li bi smetalo zakonu o autorskom
pravu i srodnim pravima (NN 167/2003). ...
Hvala obojici na odgovorima.
Sudeći po svemu navedenome, podaci iz moje baze baš se i ne kvalificiraju za
OSM. Čak i da
Just to add, we are also allowed to give the data to anybody outside
OSM who wish to use them. But I propose they should get an approval
of the group and not just me for that matter.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:17 AM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just got a word from
Hi,
I have indic fonts installed in my machine, but when I try to type them in
josm, I just get little boxen - how does one install indic (or any font) font
support in josm?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Senior Project Officer
NRC-FOSS
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
Hello,
based on an old (abandoned) proposal and on a discussion in the German board
I have created a new proposal for tagging mineshafts:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft
In addition to this proposal I would like to discuss the tag resource. In my
proposal
2009/10/20 Lesi l...@lesi.is-a-geek.net
Hello,
based on an old (abandoned) proposal and on a discussion in the German
board
I have created a new proposal for tagging mineshafts:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft
In addition to this proposal I would like to
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Peter Childs wrote:
I agree standardizing on resource might be a good idea but we might need
resource_output and resource_input or somthing
Are you an economist?
from my worldview which deals with people and biological systems
i don't see an importance in designating where
there are mineshafts and BIG mineshafts and open cut mines
and mining in english has its own language to describe the parts of the
mine
For open cut mines there is another draft. IMO they are something completly
different.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Surface_Mining
how will you tag unmined deposits in such a scheme?
If there is a unmined deposit, the mineshaft is not in use anymore
- disused=yes
lesi
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Surface_Mining
It would be helpful to know what people are mapping these features as
currently - looking in the UK I can see one man-made=mineshaft and no
references to
Hi,
Tom Hughes wrote:
The main issue of debate surrounds exactly what forms of attribution
are/are not valid.
And this is not made easier by the fact that what is valid and what not
is not the community's decision but (within the confines of the license
text) that of the individual
It would be helpful to know what people are mapping these features as
currently - looking in the UK I can see one man-made=mineshaft and no
references to surface_mining. Do you know what people are using
currently?
In the area I map the mineshafts are currently not mapped at all. Also
and no references to surface_mining
There is also landuse=quarry which can be used for surface mines.
But actually they are not part of my proposal - it refers only to
underground mining.
lesi
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/10/20 Someoneelse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Surface_Mining
It would be helpful to know what people are mapping these features as
currently - looking in the UK I can see
2009/10/20 Lesi l...@lesi.is-a-geek.net:
It would be helpful to know what people are mapping these features as
currently - looking in the UK I can see one man-made=mineshaft and no
references to surface_mining. Do you know what people are using
currently?
In the area I map the mineshafts
- Original Message
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, 20 October, 2009 13:13:31
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Proper attribution
Hi,
Tom Hughes wrote:
The main issue of debate
2009/10/20 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
There is probably a good reason only tourist attractions are mapped
because you wouldn't be allowed to go near one unless you worked
there, there is a mine shaft on the other side of town but I wouldn't
get anywhere near it.
You're missing the
2009/10/20 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2009/10/20 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
There is probably a good reason only tourist attractions are mapped
because you wouldn't be allowed to go near one unless you worked
there, there is a mine shaft on the other side of town
On 20 Oct 2009, at 12:05, Lesi wrote:
how will you tag unmined deposits in such a scheme?
If there is a unmined deposit, the mineshaft is not in use anymore
- disused=yes
Do NOT use something like disused=yes as a modifier, you instead need
to add an extra level of indirection, so that
There is probably a good reason only tourist attractions are mapped
because you wouldn't be allowed to go near one unless you worked
there, there is a mine shaft on the other side of town but I wouldn't
get anywhere near it.
I know mineshaft you can get very close to (2-3m). With your
On 20 Oct 2009, at 12:05, Lesi wrote:
how will you tag unmined deposits in such a scheme?
If there is a unmined deposit, the mineshaft is not in use anymore
- disused=yes
Do NOT use something like disused=yes as a modifier, you instead need to
add an extra level of indirection, so that
2009/10/20 Lesi l...@lesi.is-a-geek.net:
I know mineshaft you can get very close to (2-3m). With your argument half
of the features of OSM should not be mapped e.g. historic=wreck or streets
within the ground of a factory. And once again: mineshafts which have a
headframe are very good points
On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:44, Lesi wrote:
On 20 Oct 2009, at 12:05, Lesi wrote:
how will you tag unmined deposits in such a scheme?
If there is a unmined deposit, the mineshaft is not in use anymore
- disused=yes
Do NOT use something like disused=yes as a modifier, you instead
need to
Any advice on loading georectfied imagery (very large geotiff) to
josm/merkaartor/potlatch?
If WMS is the only option, anybody willing to host? This is for
tracing features on a donated high-res images (0.6 meters) for
post-disaster efforts (Typhoon Kestana and Parma) in some areas in the
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:35 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Any advice on loading georectfied imagery (very large geotiff) to
josm/merkaartor/potlatch?
* Create a mapnik style that has one layer (the geotiff) and one
rastersymbolizer
* Run generate_tiles.py to make
On 10/16/09, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Erik Johansson wrote:
Open Database License (ODbL)
“Attribution and Share-Alike for Data/Databases”
Yep. Exactly.
CC-BY-SA, famously, allows you to combine
I worried that the use of language might prove to be confusing and the the
buildings associated with a mine should have a separate tag.
1. Mineshaft may exist but we are going to be mapping the location mine
entrances, not the tunnel leading away from the mine entrance. In the future
someone may
On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:35 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Any advice on loading georectfied imagery (very large geotiff) to
josm/merkaartor/potlatch?
* Create a mapnik style that has one layer (the geotiff) and one
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Dane Springmeyer bl...@hailmail.net wrote:
Nice Andy.
If I can help let me know as well. In Mapnik trunk I've been working on
adding support for GDAL overviews, so using gdaladdo on that large Geotiff
and then reading it with the 'gdal' datasource could be
1. Mineshaft may exist but we are going to be mapping
the location mine entrances, not the tunnel leading away from
the mineentrance. In the future someone may want to map the 'way'
that the mineshaft follows especially if its a horizontal tunnel going
into a hillside
2. What we want to
I think you are mixing up audits and mineshafts. Mineshafts always go
verticaly or almost-verticaly into the ground. You are talking about
adits,
that is something completly different and should be dealed with in another
proposal. See Wikipedia for definitions of these terms.
Of course I
If you just add a disused=yes, pretty much nothing that works with the
OSM data will recognise that it is no longer a cafe. Instead you
should use something like old_amenity=cafe, or
amenity=closed;closed=cafe, that way there won't be any confusion.
I agree with you, but at the moment
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Lesi wrote:
The
area of the mine can be tagged with landuse=industrial.
Too broad a definition
industrial covers too much
mining is quite different a landuse
heavy industry doesn't build up piles of waste (mullock heaps) and then have
to rehabilitate the area in the
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Lesi wrote:
Having winding gears is the main purpose of a headframe IMO.
but when the mine shaft is disused the winding gear is removed
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Someoneelse wrote:
no
references to surface_mining. Do you know what people are using
currently?
I've used quarry for an open cut mine, but it isn't appropriate for the size
of feature involved.
___
talk mailing list
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
If you just add a disused=yes, pretty much nothing that works with the OSM
data will recognise that it is no longer a cafe.
But a disused mineshaft is still a mineshaft, it's just an abandoned one.
As another
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Lesi wrote:
Of course I meant adit and not audit. Some people would call it a gallery.
In Australia I've heard
level
gallery
stopes
and probably some other words i've forgotten
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Jason Cunningham wrote:
4. The term Headframe is used to describe a Pit Head, which is confusing.
More problems with language use. Pit Head appears to be the correct term
for the building or structure.
I don't claim to be an expert on mining language but pit head is the
but when the mine shaft is disused the winding gear is removed
I can not confirm this. All disused mineshafts I know still have their
winding gear, only the cables are removed.
But even if the winding gear is removed you can tag with headframe=yes. Of
courde, if the whole headframe is
how will you tag unmined deposits in such a scheme?
If there is a unmined deposit, the mineshaft is not in use anymore -
disused=yes.
lesi
I wasn't thinking of disused, i was thinking of still there, with or
without a
mineshaft
Perhaps, my English is too bad, but I do not really
Underground resources can not be mapped.
why not?
isn't that what a geology map does?
I was commenting on the resource proposal really
Now I get your point.
The resource-tag describes for which resource the mineshaft was built.
If the mineshaft is disused, it is irrelevant if the deposits
maning sambale emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com writes:
Any advice on loading georectfied imagery (very large geotiff) to
josm/merkaartor/potlatch?
If WMS is the only option, anybody willing to host? This is for
tracing features on a donated high-res images (0.6 meters) for
post-disaster
2009/10/20 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Lesi wrote:
The
area of the mine can be tagged with landuse=industrial.
Too broad a definition
industrial covers too much
mining is quite different a landuse
heavy industry doesn't build up piles of waste (mullock heaps) and then
Ah that easy?! Look so simple versus a WMS configuration.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:35 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Any advice on loading georectfied imagery (very large geotiff) to
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote:
maning sambale emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com writes:
Any advice on loading georectfied imagery (very large geotiff) to
josm/merkaartor/potlatch?
If WMS is the only option, anybody willing to host? This is for
Someoneelse wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Surface_Mining
It would be helpful to know what people are mapping these features as
currently - looking in the UK I can see one man-made=mineshaft and
Shaun McDonald wrote:
If you just add a disused=yes, pretty much nothing that works with the
OSM data will recognise that it is no longer a cafe.
Don't map for the renderer, router etc. etc.
You should be writing a post asking why they don't recognise such a
widely used tag.
Cheers
Dave F.
Lesi wrote:
I was already planning to start a proposal for heaps. At the moment I use
natural=peak.
Not sure what to use at the moment, but they're definitely not natural.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
If you just add a disused=yes, pretty much nothing that works with the
OSM data will recognise that it is no longer a cafe.
Don't map for the renderer, router etc. etc.
You should be writing a post
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
If you just add a disused=yes, pretty much nothing that works with the
OSM data will recognise that it is no longer a cafe.
Don't map for
Dave F.:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
If you just add a disused=yes, pretty much nothing that works with the
OSM data will recognise that it is no longer a cafe.
Don't map for the renderer, router etc. etc.
You should be writing a post asking why they don't recognise such a
widely used tag.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Because tags like disused=yes conflict with a general principle in OSM:
We don't have a fixed set of tags and mappers can invent and use their
own tags, so it should be possible for software to ignore tags it
doesn't
Anthony schrieb:
Disused canal, fine. Disused railway, sure. Disused building, no
problem. Disused quarry, yes.
But disused cafe? A cafe is a building, or part of a building, which
is *used* as a cafe. The use is part of the definition.
Well, yes and no.
People might remember that
Neither list has any real traffic, and what they do tend to just be
reposts of talk-us.
Splitting the community at this stage is retarded, we should wait for
talk-us to grow to a sizable level and then begin spinning off as
required, like we did with the other lists.
Yours c.
Steve
Hi all,
I received some GPS traces from someone in Vanuatu. He had had them for
some time, but didn't have the opportunity to slice them up and upload
them. I took the data and used gpsbabel to split the entire GPS log into
daily chunks which coincided with manageable trip segments.
I checked
2009/10/21 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
Anthony schrieb:
Disused canal, fine. Disused railway, sure. Disused building, no
problem. Disused quarry, yes.
But disused cafe? A cafe is a building, or part of a building, which
is *used* as a cafe. The use is part of the
me too
also bay area
On 20 Oct 2009, at 21:00 , Dan Homerick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:23 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Neither list has any real traffic, and what they do tend to just be
reposts of talk-us.
Splitting the community at this stage is retarded, we should wait for
Thanks Yves,
yup, i DEFINATLY support the idea of Barcelona for the 2010 SOTM, (i
saw on the talk-au list that maybe 2011 would be great for Austrailia,
and maybe 2012 for Canada. (we should be all imported by then) :)
and yes, if you can help on the sotm planning side, i think is Henk
who is a
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:07:48 +0200, YRS jav...@hccnet.nl wrote:
Heeft iemand al ervaring met bungalow- cq vakantieparken? Ik dacht aan
tourism=chalet om te beginnen met een node, maar wat doe ik met de
wegen? Meestal is eer een soort rondweg (mag ik die tertiary taggen? Nog
access tags?)
tourism=chalet word in Nederland al op meerdere plekken gebruikt voor een
bungalowpark (heb ik zelf ook al gedaan voor landal
suyderooghhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.38731lon=6.21564zoom=16layers=B000FTF
).
Volgens de definitie (
Zijn die wegen niet meestal ook eigen weg (i.p.v. openbare weg) met
restrictie dat je alleen daar mag komen als je daar ook een huisje hebt
(meestal ook afgezet met slagbomen). Enkele parken kunnen zelfs
restrictie hebben dat je alleen van de wegen gebruik mag maken op de
dagen dat mensen
Myckel Habets wrote:
Zijn die wegen niet meestal ook eigen weg (i.p.v. openbare weg) met
Verwar 'openbaar' niet met 'publiek'. Ook een privaatweg/eigen weg kan
wel degelijk een openbaar karakter hebben, en heeft dat
(verkeers)wettelijk gezien veel en veel vaker dan we denken (in NL).
--
Hallo allemaal!
Zouden de talk-nl managers Martijn van Exel en/of Henk Hoff aan kunnen
geven hoeveel ingeschrevenen talk-nl heeft?
Ter vergelijking; bij OSGeo is dat openbaar:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/VisibilityStats#Mailing_list_subscribers
Ik wil namelijk weten hoeveel potentiële impact
Howdy!
Ik zat te denken dat er misschien wel (nederlandse) bedrijven/instanties zijn
die wel iets met OSM data willen doen maar geen zin hebben om allerlei rare
software te moeten configureren om aan die data te komen.
Nu zat ik te denken om van (potentieel) interessante data shapefiles ter
Momenteel zijn er 218 abonnees op de NL-mailinglist (deze dus)
Gr,
Henk
Op 20 oktober 2009 16:54 heeft Milo van der Linden m...@opengeo.nl
het volgende geschreven:
Hallo allemaal!
Zouden de talk-nl managers Martijn van Exel en/of Henk Hoff aan kunnen
geven hoeveel ingeschrevenen talk-nl
zeker handig, ik neem aan dat het vast wel gebruikt gaat worden.
provinciegrenzen (al dan niet met provinciehoofdsteden) zou ook leuk zijn.
er was op de osm gebruikers dag iemand die dit zeker kan gebruiken maar ik
moet even nadenken hoe hij ook al weer heette, kom ik op terug :)
groet,
floris
Goed zo!
Dank je wel Henk voor de snelle response!
Met vriendelijke groet,
Milo van der Linden
Henk Hoff schreef:
Momenteel zijn er 218 abonnees op de NL-mailinglist (deze dus)
Gr,
Henk
Op 20 oktober 2009 16:54 heeft Milo van der Linden m...@opengeo.nl
het volgende geschreven:
2009/10/20 Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Howdy!
Ik zat te denken dat er misschien wel (nederlandse) bedrijven/instanties zijn
die wel iets met OSM data willen doen maar geen zin hebben om allerlei rare
software te moeten configureren om aan die data te komen.
[knip]
Ik heb laatst een
I have tired to find some official definitions to clarify this.
Here is the Australian Standard definition of a road from AS 1348—2002 Road
and traffic engineering—Glossary of terms:
road: Route trafficable by motor vehicles; in law, the public right-of-way
between boundaries of adjoining
2009/10/20 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
i don't grade tracks
(personal belief only, if someone else wishes to spend time doing grading
that's fine, but the condition of the surface varies according to when the
council last graded, rain etc)
Actually I'd say tracks don't get graded, unclassified
2009/10/20 swanilli swani...@gmail.com:
Here is a pragmatic solution based on AS 1348 and OSM custom:
highway=road if it is open to the public and located between property
boundaries, regardless of surface.
Some roads go through private properties, but they aren't tracks, you
usually cross
I've been toying with the idea of putting a bid in for SoTM 2010,
would anyone else be interested in helping put together the bid?
There is a wiki page up on bids for next year + links to past bids etc.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2010/Bid
True, but it is probably just a technicality, in that it is the same
property owner on both sides of the road, with a strip of public land (the
road) down the middle. You just can't tell because there are no fences.
(Actually, this is where Google maps can be useful in Australia because they
do
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
I've been toying with the idea of putting a bid in for SoTM 2010,
would anyone else be interested in helping put together the bid?
There is a wiki page up on bids for next year + links to past bids etc.
2009/10/20 swanilli swani...@gmail.com:
True, but it is probably just a technicality, in that it is the same
property owner on both sides of the road, with a strip of public land (the
road) down the middle. You just can't tell because there are no fences.
(Actually, this is where Google maps
2009/10/20 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
I reckon 2011 is a better bet
I tend to agree we still have a few more ducks to get in order etc.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Quoting swanilli swani...@gmail.com:
Here is a pragmatic solution based on AS 1348 and OSM custom:
highway=road if it is open to the public and located between property
boundaries, regardless of surface.
Here are some ways that are between property boundaries, but
definitely not roads
2009/10/20 Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au:
I think Liz's suggestion (avoiding obstacles = track, etc) makes
sense, so I'll go with this, bearing in mind temporary obstacles like
potholes that may be graded later.
You get potholes on sealed roads, so that isn't saying much :)
Corrigates on
swanilli swani...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tired to find some official definitions to clarify this.
Here is the Australian Standard definition of a road from AS 1348?2002 Road
and traffic engineering?Glossary of terms:
road: Route trafficable by motor vehicles; in law, the public
2009/10/20 Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au:
highway=road means A road of unknown classification. This is intended as
a temporary tag to mark a road until it has been properly surveyed.
I think he meant highway=unclassified
How is the proximity of a property boundary relevant to the tagging of
2009/10/20 Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au:
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I'd say tracks don't get graded, unclassified roads do. IMHO
the only maintainence a tracks get is when a tree falls across the
track and needs to be cut up by RFS or NPWS.
Many fire trails in
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I think he meant highway=unclassified
Probably, but that's not going to be right all the time either.
Not proximity of a boundary, is it within a boundary or not.
I still don't think that matters for tagging the road, only for tagging
land use.
--
Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
does anyone know if gosmore or navit or other program can be persuaded to
work
on one of these machines?
I don't know that much about WinCE, but I think software isn't portable
between platforms even on the same chip architecture (eg, ARM). You'd
need an SDK or
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
Most people aren't taught to drive or grow up on dirt roads, I only
have a 2wd car and I'll drive it on roads some/most people wouldn't,
so that's a bit too subjective...
and we have enough trouble with furriners trying to drive commodores on
unsuitable
I am often mildly amused, though sometimes dismayed, by the way threads on
this list head off at strange tangents. This is another and the kind of
reaction one gets makes me wonder whether it is worth the effort to
contribute.
Just to make things clear: I noted in my original contribution that
I am not sure how this clarifies or confuses the tagging of roads in OSM
compared with the Australian Standard definition. Both seem to be saying the
same thing in different words.
However, to move things along it would be worth looking into
http://www.ozroads.com.au, an unofficial website that
2009/10/21 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
Most people aren't taught to drive or grow up on dirt roads, I only
have a 2wd car and I'll drive it on roads some/most people wouldn't,
so that's a bit too subjective...
and we have enough trouble with furriners trying
2009/10/21 Ian Wills swani...@gmail.com:
I am often mildly amused, though sometimes dismayed, by the way threads on
this list head off at strange tangents. This is another and the kind of
reaction one gets makes me wonder whether it is worth the effort to
contribute.
No one was disagreeing
Creio que a população da cidade faça diferença sim. Antes Natal era
ofuscada por uma cidade vizinha (Parnamirim). Depois de eu colocar as
populações dessas duas cidades, Natal aparece bem antes no Mapnik. Ainda há
várias capitais e cidades populosas com esse problema (Recife, Rio de
Janeiro, São
Correção: algumas dessas cidades (como o Rio) têm a informação de população.
Os renderizadores que tão com algum problema, nesse caso.
2009/10/20 Bráulio Bezerra da Silva brauliobeze...@gmail.com
Creio que a população da cidade faça diferença sim. Antes Natal era
ofuscada por uma cidade
Olá,
Pra minimizar o problema de dados duplicados, nem todas as cidades (nodes,
pontos) foram importados dos dados do IBGE. Se já havia uma outra cidade
próxima (menos de 5km aprox) o ponto do IBGE não era importado. Talvez valessa
a pena dar uma verificada manual nesses dados não importados
Em Ter 20 Out 2009, Rodrigo de Avila escreveu:
Deu pra ver neste exemplo que o 'Blumenau Maior' é um ponto que foi
colocado pelo usuário 'alvarenga' (você?), e o 'Blumenau Menor' é
desenhado pelo Mapnik em um ponto quase central ao pol'igono do
município (você pode enxergar o polígono todo
Em Ter 20 Out 2009, Junior, Claudomiro escreveu:
Olá,
Pra minimizar o problema de dados duplicados, nem todas as cidades
(nodes, pontos) foram importados dos dados do IBGE. Se já havia uma
outra cidade próxima (menos de 5km aprox) o ponto do IBGE não era
importado. Talvez valessa a pena
Bem vindo Giovani! Ótimo ver que a palestra rendeu frutos =)
O N78 tá saindo a um custo-benefício bacana. Quanto ao GPS do DealExtreme,
eu tenho um desses http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.21684 e
funciona bem tanto com o N95 quanto com o N800 - nunca testei com o
notebook.
A
StilgarBF (o...@projekt2k.de)schrieb:
Hallo,
ist denn bekannt ob es ein Problem mit den Planet-Files gibt, die der
Mapnik-Renderer verwendet?
Ich habe am 2. einige Inseln im südlichen Myanmar angelegt, die werden
aber immer noch nicht gerendert. Ebenso viele Verfeinerungen an der
bestehenden
malenki schrieb:
StilgarBF (o...@projekt2k.de)schrieb:
Hallo,
ist denn bekannt ob es ein Problem mit den Planet-Files gibt, die der
Mapnik-Renderer verwendet?
Ich habe am 2. einige Inseln im südlichen Myanmar angelegt, die werden
aber immer noch nicht gerendert. Ebenso viele
Moin Ulf,
P.S: Jetzt wo ich das hingeschrieben habe fällt mir auf, daß ich
wohl ziemlich genau den Wikipedia Mechanismus: Dieser Account ist
keine Sockenpuppe nochmal neu erfunden habe :-)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pers%C3%B6nliche_Bekanntschaften
Rainer
--
Am 19. Oktober 2009 22:33 schrieb qbert biker qbe...@gmx.de:
Autobahn und Bundesstrasse funktionieren damit ganz gut, aber
beim Rest muss man sich eben damit abfinden, dass es
Konflikte geben kann und die ganz einfache Regel zu keinen
guten Ergebnis führt. Klar kann ich alle Strassen in eine
Hi!
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 19. Oktober 2009 21:48 schrieb Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Spätestens bei bz2 hast du dann auf chat/mail/forum dumme Kommentare in
der Art dusseliger Windowsbenutzer, da kann ja nicht mal bz2.
1. http://www.google.de/#q=bz2
2.
Hi!
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
Nop schrieb:
So könnte ich mir einen Installer vorstellen:
Ok, wenn's um fertige Karten geht, paßt natürlich ein Installer besser.
Aber so ein Ding wie Du es beschreibst, sollte man z.B. mit NSIS und
sendmap in ein paar Tagen fertig haben, mit Ausnahme des Backups,
Florian Lohoff f...@rfc822.org wrote:
es scheint heute kein update der All in One gegeben zu haben - ist
das richtig?
4GB RAM reichen der virtuellen Maschine nicht mehr aus. Wir ziehen das
ganze gerade auf einen der neuen FOSSGIS Server um.
Gruss
Sven
--
Das Internet wird vor allem von
1 - 100 di 249 matches
Mail list logo
