OSMF Strategic Planning Team
Craig Allan, Sarah Hoffmann, Allan Mustard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 2018-08-10 21:06, Simon Poole wrote:
While the goals sound worthy, it is unclear if any of the grid systems
(w3w, plus codes and so on) deliver on their promises and have any
traction outside of people in countries with established addressing
systems trying to push them as solutions for
, then set 'OLC'. Then it
will display Plus codes for any location on the map that you pick. It
works fine for any object on the map, or even blank spaces if you want.
No need for any specific tags.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Yep, I'm having the same issue at login
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:25 PM Nikhil VJ wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apologies if this is a repeat post.. I'm not seeing these mailing lists
> often.
>
> The India HOT Tasking Manager site http://tasks.openstreetmap.in is not
> working when we try to login.
On 2018-05-02 11:53, Jez Nicholson wrote:
Oh, this is fun. So, correct me if i'm wrong: a "20 mph zone" doesn't
have/need repeaters because it is not actually the legal speed limit.
It is advisory to travel at that speed because traffic calming makes
it hard not to.
A 20 sign with a green
On 2018-01-20 14:36, Gaurav Thapa wrote:
Yes, I am aware of these buttons. Do you mean that we do Ctrl+S
frequently in order to do partial saves? I feel this might allow for
greater chance for conflicts to occur rather than uploading frequently.
In JOSM, click on the Upload button. Then in
thing to the CC licence, so its
not required to give attribution for data derived from Mapillary photos
etc. https://www.mapillary.com/legal
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ific tag for telephone_box or something?
It would also be useful to tag that it is a classic red phone box, even
if you don't know what exact model it is.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
necessary. And probably more accurate - should be a bigger
antenna, and it can use GPS, GLONASS and Galileo.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 2017-02-26 11:24, Dave F wrote:
Hi
I'm still working through the FHRS database for my local authority.
There section 'mobile caterers' where some they have a goecoded
location. These are mobile vans which get towed away at night but have a
regular pitch during the day. Often to be found in
On 2017-01-31 18:02, Andreas Vilén wrote:
I always have all checks activated so it seems it just misses stuff
sometimes... Could the issue be that I never reinstall Josm when I
update but just overwrite the josm-tested.jar file with the new one?
Sounds like you have told JOSM to ignore an
On 2017-01-10 01:20, David Groom wrote:
Although "beet" could also refer to "sugar beet"
Or "fodder beet" (aka mangelwurzel).
I think it is rather similar to sugar beet, not sure if you could tell
the difference in the field.
It seems they are all the same species (Beta vulgaris), but
On 2016-12-05 16:12, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Greetings
At Stirling Corner, on the A1 in Barnet, there is a cycle way (hence
also available for pedestrians) that goes around the outside of the
roundabout (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78315291). A cursory glance
at satellite mapping shows it
On 2016-11-09 13:47, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El onsdag 9. november 2016 13.36.11 CET Craig Wallace escribió:
Is it just for streets? Or can you add photos of footpaths, cyclepaths,
railways, rivers etc. Or any other feature you can travel along.
Why not have a name with less focus on streets
On 2016-11-08 15:34, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open
street level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for Android and
iOS. Since then, we not only have collected almost 30 kilometers of
coverage, but also received a
On 2016-09-23 19:15, SK53 wrote:
Hi Paul,
I'd be very interested in this providing it has a decent licence. AFAIK
Vision of Britain has a restrictive licence which means that I have
spent some time recreating small parts of their data on OHM (e.g.,
London Boroughs of the LCC). There's still a
On 2016-09-10 21:23, john whelan wrote:
I'm not sure that it is an issue. If the lat and long can be extracted
in the way that Nomination can handle it isn't an issue.
The bigger issue at the moment is how do you extract the lat and long
easily? Downloading a bit of OSM into JOSM, saving the
Box Study Group probably have a list, but only available to
paying members.
Currently 141 mapped in OSM. Of those, 138 are tagged as pillar, and 3 wall.
And no disused EVIIIR postboxes mapped yet?
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap
On 2016-08-30 18:24, Colin Smale wrote:
I am going to say this very quietly what3words
Which forces you to use the what3words website, or an officially
licensed app.
If you want to use a postcode/coordinate system, there are plenty of
better options.
eg Open Location Codes (Plus
have surveyed a few of the local ones, and added them to OSM.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
sections?
The Garmin maps is another question. They seem to label the whole area
with the island name, which is often unhelpful and confusing, even for
smaller islands. Probably better just to have a label in the middle of
the island, or on the coast.
Craig
On 2016-05-11 06:44, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
On 10/05/2016 20:59, Eric Grosso wrote:
What do you think? Do we, OSM contributors, tag all the highways part of
a NCN as cycleways? What to do when in some cases, a highway is both
part of a NCN route and a hiking route (e.g the John Muir Way)?
On 2016-04-25 21:55, John Whelan wrote:
Apols it looks as if only pact of my message got sent.
My local city is purchasing bicycle GPS track data from a company that
has a fitness app. Apparently many cities would like this sort of
data. However it doesn't capture those who don't have a
On 2016-04-05 14:59, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Is there a site or tool somewhere where I can click on a point on an OSM
tile and get back the OSGR? I want the quality of OSM, but need OSGR
unfortunately.
Thanks
Stuart
You can use Where's the Path. http://wtp2.appspot.com/wheresthepath.htm
It can
On 2015-07-16 14:22, Karl-Philipp Richter wrote:
Hi,
Is there an issue tracker for http[s]://www.openstreetmap.org or have
there ever been any plans for such a useful and straightforward way of
introducing improvements (it'd be not exposed in a mail list archive
reachable by a search engine,
On 2015-05-06 21:09, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 19:47 +0100, Rob Nickerson wrote:
That's interesting. Have just tried the app out. It gives you the
postboxes in OpenStreetMap but not the ones that are missing (as shown
by blue markers on Robert's comparison tool:
to actually find the
postbox. And there are a few on the Royal Mail list that have now been
removed, or where the number on the box doesn't match the list.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 2015-04-09 14:00, Phil Endecott wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
I came across this example [1] where a way has bicycle=no and
cycleway=lane.
IMHO these two tags are also conflicting and the bicycle=no should be
removed. Any thoughts?
Cycle lanes that you cannot, either practically or legally,
On 2014-12-01 13:57, Richard Mann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:22 PM, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk
mailto:li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Usage of adjacent seems to be fairly localised in the UK:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/6k7
Yeah, probably just me (maybe nobody else feels
On 2014-11-06 17:26, Ed Loach wrote:
Steve asked:
Has this service been discontinued? Or is there just a temporary problem
with it?
According to the wiki, faffy has a problem
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Platform_Status
I believe os.openstreetmap.org was temporarily pointed elsewhere
On 2014-10-24 15:35, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 24/10/2014 15:13, Dan S wrote:
Co-operative - not clear to me why you choose to drop The from
this one, since it's included in the branding? You choose to keep it
for The Co-operative Food.
+1: see http://www.co-operative.coop/about-us/
Also note
On 2014-10-23 11:20, David Cuenca wrote:
There are many people who record both a gps trace and a video of their
itinerary.
Do you think it would be viable to use these videos as a sort of street
view by associating the frames to a location? When there is no gps
trace, it could be done by
On 2014-10-23 16:59, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
On 23/10/2014 15:00, Craig Wallace wrote:
taking a photo every second, or maybe every 5 or 10 seconds, depends
on what you are surveying and how fast you are moving.
Do none of those cameras offer the logical alternative to timelapse
vehicles down, eg speed bumps, or chicanes.
Or street furniture, ie trees, bollards, benches on the road.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
to the
value.
But there's nothing wrong with redirect pages on the wiki anyway. It
helps people find the correct page, and avoids creating duplicates.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
as motor_vehicle=private (or motor_vehicle=no).
In Scotland, you would generally have a right to walk or cycle there
etc, so should also be tagged as foot=yes, bicycle=yes. Not sure about
the legality in England and Wales.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
visited these.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
://www.frankieandshadow.com/xref/covered2.jpg
I wouldn't tag those as tunnels, because they are open at the sides.
More useful to tag them as covered. ie covered=yes, or maybe
covered=arcade or covered=colonnade.
See this page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
Craig
.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
of interwiki links as they keep the connection
protocol.
Interwiki links to Wikipedia work fine.
Just use something like [[wikipedia:OpenStreetMap]] or [[w:OpenStreetMap]]
Or specify the language, eg [[wikipedia:de:OpenStreetMap]]
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk
termination tower or maybe terminator.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
on finding is elements on OSM
which don't seem to exist in reality. For example:
Some useful guides on the wiki about fixing TIGER and GNIS:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/USGS_GNIS
Craig
___
talk mailing
. But they
are very incomplete/inconsistent, and often accidentally edited or
broken etc. And probably out of date if the official boundaries have
changed anywhere. So generally not as useful or reliable as just using
the OS OpenData.
Craig
___
talk
on the ground, during
construction/refurbishment works.
I would agree that things like the operator or voltage shouldn't be
tagged as the name, you can use the specific tags for these.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
#tackle-the-backlog-v3x
I am appreciate that the patches welcome response is not tremendously
positive, but, culling issues from trac and transferring them over to the
github issue tracker would be a quick and easy way to help getting the
issues you care about fixed.
Regards,
Craig
On 8
of places may be used for a wide variety of events, so may
be known by different names. eg might be used for conferences,
exhibition, live music etc.
I think a more generic tag for an event hall would be useful.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
.
Or use the revert scripts.
Some details here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
it with a command like this:
java -Xmx1500M -jar josm-tested.jar
That would allow it 1500MB.
Or for merging large files, you could use Osmosis.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmosis
ie use a command like this:
osmosis --rx file2.osm --rx file1.osm --m --wx merged.osm
Craig
.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
the question to rather look at suitability for a task and
then define the task.
Craig
___
Talk-ZA mailing list
Talk-ZA@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za
based maps may take much longer to update, eg the
cycle map sometimes takes a few weeks.
See this question and answers for more details:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/102/i-have-made-edits-but-they-dont-show-up-on-the-map
Craig
___
talk
On 2013-04-20 19:24, Paul Johnson wrote:
OK, but would you apply this to Scotland and Wales? Because that's an
analogous situation in the UK.
Not really.
Scotland/England/Wales are clearly administrative boundaries, and they
are tagged as such in OSM. And they fit in the hierarchy of admin
is signposted can vary. Sometimes its just a painted number, sometimes
its a proper plate, including the line reference.
Do you include the line reference as part of the bridge reference? I
think its a good idea to do so, when its known. eg tag as something like
bridge_ref=ETN/1601
Craig
this.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 23/02/2013 19:28, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
On 22 February 2013 15:25, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
at least
one localized name to be equal to the name attribute, mappers will either be
offended and leave the project or they will find a solution, imagine
this seems somewhat pointless, as the fact that its a crossroads
or T-junction should be obvious from the geometry of the ways.
highway=junction would conflict with other highway tags. eg many
T-junctions or crossroads are also tagged with highway=traffic_signals.
Craig
.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
:(
Regards,
Craig
___
Talk-ZA mailing list
Talk-ZA@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za
than the alternative colon separated versions.
This seems like an appeal to popularity; one could point to tree:ref or
some other *:ref.
Craig
On 31 December 2012 22:27, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 December 2012 16:38, David Groom revi...@pacific
around here have house names instead of numbers (or house
names as well as numbers).
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
://tile.poole.ch/noname/${z}/${x}/${y}.png;.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
maps, or try producing some maps
yourself. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Map_On_Garmin
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I like the fact that they took some artistic license and used "stylized", or "iconified" shields, rather than trying to do a perfect pixel-per-pixel resize of the prototype shields. The latter method does not necessarily produce good on-screen results.(Which is to be expected, given that the
it still has railway stations labelled with the default name,
even if they do have a name in the specified language.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Terrace is an alternative name for that section of OSM Road, so
tag it as alt_name. Or possibly name:left / name:right, if it is just
one side of the road.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
the world files.
Regards,
Craig
___
Talk-ZA mailing list
Talk-ZA@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za
Wiggins postbox is listed as Markey Street, Chorley, but
the map seems to be pointing to Adlington, a few miles away. And the one
for Westminster Abbey is marked at Trafalgar Square.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
railway, that have since been split by modern developments?
As an aside, how would one map a dismantled railway bridge? And, how
would one map an intact but disused bridge from which the railway
tracks have been removed?
Craig
On 3 July 2012 22:47, Donald Noble drno...@gmail.com wrote:
As someone
tried using it for FIT files from
my Forerunner 110.
Or you can download from the Edge into Garmin Training Center or
BaseCamp, then export as GPX. Though that's probably not very convenient
for a lot of files.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk
On 30/05/2012 16:11, Jason Cunningham wrote:
This suggests the original Boundary Line data is superior, but would
need to be compared to 2012 releases to check boundaries have not moved.
Does anyone have the original Boundary Line release? and would they be
able to make them available?
The
). Pretty much everything west of Woodstock Road up to Port
Meadow has been invented [4].
[1] http://www.itv.com/itvplayer/video/?Filter=317466
[2] http://craigloftus.net/tmp/lewis/1.jpg
[3] http://craigloftus.net/tmp/lewis/2.jpg
[4] http://osm.org/go/eutD0~iS
Craig
as disused=yes. Which is clearly incorrect, the stations
are definitely still open and in use.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
( http://www.lbsg.org/ ), though it seems the
database is only available to paid-up members.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com:
It seems to me that network=US:US:Business:MD is the logical extension of
a scheme that has US:US and US:US:Business.
My initial reaction is that this goes too far in mixing geographic,
classification, and rendering concepts, which has a bad smell:
* It forces one
Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com:
modifier=* would represent MUTCD-type banners attached to the shield
This is the first I've heard of this tag. I don't recall it being
discussed when we were hashing ideas around on this last summer. (Not
that that is reason to discount it.)
But what came out
mentioning OS and Navteq as map providers.
Regards,
Craig
On 7 April 2012 18:19, TimPigden tim.pig...@optrak.com wrote:
While it's clearly ephemeral, in the sense that it is of limited duration -
so is much geographical data. Weather, for example.
In this case if you were trying to make deliveries
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
It seems that many people see the network tag as not representing a
network but a shield design. Does this sound accurate?
No, because, where shield designs differ by agency for the same logical
network classification, the network tag does not change,
This one is at least twice as good.
http://binged.it/GPumvM
Craig
On 9 March 2012 14:26, Mike Valiant mike_vali...@hotmail.com wrote:
The node below it should be tagged as: under_flight_path=yes!
From: h...@cantab.net
To: nick.w.aus...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:33:30 +
CC
posters, looked at the history of every way I touched, and actually
spent quite a bit of time re-mapping many ways I came across.
Cheers,
Craig
On 23 March 2012 13:14, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March 2012 12:58, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Incidentally
I've been working down the list in ID order (though you can sort the
columns if you want)
And some. I ordered by type and randomly clicked on a dozen and
haven't found one you haven't already squashed.
I have better luck finding things using badmap.
Craig
On 23 March 2012 08:51, e
in situations
like the Ed's list [2] does not work or throw any error at all.
[1]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=55.9567019lon=-3.1310164way=32795934zoom=16
[2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=32795934
Craig
On 23 March 2012 12:34, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March
if
it is just a highway=footway and you know it exists there shouldn't be
a problem.
Craig
On 23 March 2012 12:58, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Incidentally, is just knowing the footpaths evidence enough to tag with
odbl=clean? Or is there the risk that the footpath
This was discussed in the August 2011 thread, Use of ref-tag on state
highways.
At the time, a number of people seemed to be on board with the
network-classification-per-banner scheme, as in:
network=US:US:Alternate
ref=1
Or, something similar at the state level:
network=US:VA:Secondary
=18
That bridge is tagged as bridge=generic bridge.
If it is a generic bridge, then just tag it as bridge=yes. Then it
will be rendered correctly on Mapnik.
Plus I'd agree with what Chris says - if its possible to walk/drive
along it, then also tag it as a path or track etc.
Craig
extract from Geofabrik. It includes all
of England, Scotland and Wales, so you won't need to download them
separately then merge them.
Craig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
highlighting missing streetnames.
eg OSM Inspector (with highways view): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
Or Yet another validation tool: http://beta.letuffe.org/
They seem to be updated frequently.
Craig
--
Craig Wallace
craig...@fastmail.fm
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Send your email first class
the case, but I don't think it
is now.
I think the direction only matters for coastlines, islands in the sea,
which do not make use of relations.
Craig
On 28 January 2012 22:01, John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
OK how
the changeset.
In Potlatch 2, you can press C after saving to close the changeset. Or
the changeset will automatically close after an hour. So I don't think
it really matters if you actually press the button to close the
changeset anyway.
Craig
___
Talk
[Richard] Clearly these evil paint-separated commuter lanes are a gateway
way to one-area-per-lane micro-mapping. [...]
[Paul] I'm not seeing how the slippery slope argument applies [...]
Nor am I.
Choosing to model distinct, disparate, and incompatible traffic flows as
a single flow when
What to model as discrete ways has always struck me as a gray area in the OSM model.
I'm of the opinion that,at locations where traffic maynot or cannottransfer from one linear flow to another, the flows should be modelled as discrete ways.
Thereason for the inability to transfer between flows
Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
I would not separate a road with a double-yellow in the middle into two
separate ways
And millions of miles of two-lane roads with opposing flows have been
modeled in OSM as single ways. But why?
I'd submit that it's because the current de facto usage of ways is
of Middlesbrough and in
the Whitby area.
The resolution isn't all that great, which seems a little strange.
Craig
On 19 December 2011 13:53, Stephen Gower
socks-openstreetmap@earth.li wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 06:05:43PM +, Robert Norris wrote:
Not sure how widespread the update
be really nice is if the OS would just ask all
councils permission to release the data and then just release it all.
Perhaps by April 2013?
Craig
On 1 December 2011 10:24, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
There are more words about the OS being committed to changing its
derived data
delivery models such as turning any of its member Trading
Funds into Companies Act companies.
Craig
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
aren't tied in a traditional sense? My
feeling is to just use operator=* and brewery=* as it is unrealistic
represent it in more detail?
Craig
On 27 November 2011 11:05, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 18 November 2011 12:39, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.com
wrote
to refer to real ale from the decades-long
activities of CAMRA which was never called CAMRAB - this is splitting hairs
It is only splitting hairs if your beer horizon extends no further
than the channel.
Craig
On 27 November 2011 20:18, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
But it's common
on the ground. The
NaPTAN import guidelines are that if a NaPTAN node is not physically
present on the ground but you have knowledge that it is used as a stop
then: Add a physically_present=no tag [, and] Add a highway=bus_stop
tag, i.e., it needs a survey to confirm its status.
Craig
On 22 November 2011
exclusion rules if a pattern emerges from the entries being marked.
Craig
On 22 November 2011 19:43, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 November 2011 09:02, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Is there a way to flag false positives?
Well, I don't have one at the moment. I was thinking
overloading real_ale (real_beer), with
'draught' and 'bottled' values.
Craig
On 17 November 2011 21:48, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 20:55, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 17 November 2011 19:59, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote
1 - 100 di 260 matches
Mail list logo
