I fired up ThunderBird that I hadn't used it days. In a few seconds
it had all folders checked and updated. No problem.
I guess a few exits and restarts. Cleaning the caches etc. just might
make things better but...
Phew! I was beginning to feel that I was the only one in step with these
Hello Thomas Fernandez everyone else,
on 27-Nov-2005 at 04:47 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote:
The only thing that keeps me waiting a bit longer is whether anybody
finds out why on some machines, opening messages in seperate window
takes several seconds. This has been experiecned by three
Hello Thomas Fernandez everyone else,
on 27-Nov-2005 at 04:33 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote:
If I had a hex editor, what would I be looking for in that file?
ASK Take a look if there's still some messages inside.
Trying to manually salvage some messages, OK.
Exactly. XVI32 has these nice
Hello Thomas!
On Saturday, November 26, 2005, 9:39 PM, you wrote:
Did you buy the box version that comes with an email address? I
seem to remember something like that...
LG Really? I didn't know that some boxed versions came with an
LG e-mail address.. At which domain? Ritlabs?
No, the
Hello Roman,
Safe: does not cause loss of data and/or settings and will not force me to
roll back.
Should be a matter of course for release versions of any software.
I'm currently testing 3.63.05, a real beta, and if I have problems with
it I revert to 3.62.14. If that tells you something :)
Hello Alexander!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 3:38 AM, you wrote:
The only thing that keeps me waiting a bit longer is whether
anybody finds out why on some machines, opening messages in
seperate window takes several seconds. This has been experiecned by
three people, the other hundreds of
Luca:
Now I see that not all my mail folders appear empty: TB correctly finds some
of them on the new e: volume - where I copied all my mail directories - and in
properties/general for all these folders I can read directory: default
The folders which TB still searches in u: for, are those
Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
on 27-Nov-2005 at 11:59 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
Everyone who does a direct comparison of the graphics rendering
speed in 3.0.1.33 vs. 3.62.14 will notice the difference - 3.62.14
is ALWAYS slower, thats the issue...
But, as I commented on TBBETA, it has not
Hello Alexander!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 5:14 AM, you wrote:
Everyone who does a direct comparison of the graphics rendering
speed in 3.0.1.33 vs. 3.62.14 will notice the difference - 3.62.14
is ALWAYS slower, thats the issue...
But, as I commented on TBBETA, it has not been slow
Hello MAU everyone else,
on 27-Nov-2005 at 11:52 you (MAU) wrote:
I'm currently testing 3.63.05, a real beta, and if I have problems with
it I revert to 3.62.14. If that tells you something :)
Same here - 3.62.14 is very stable reliable, just as it should be. :)
--
Best regards,
Hi,
My mail folders are rather large, and since a while, as soon as I
start The Bat! I've got my cpu working at 100%. (which is, obviously,
slowing down the whole computer)
I'm using The Bat! Version 3.60.07
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
AMD Athlon 2400+
1,99 GHz
Hello lex,
I'm using The Bat! Version 3.60.07
That is quite an old *beta*. Why don't you first upgrade to the latest
release 3.62.14?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.05 (Beta)
Winamp Playing: Pat Metheny - Daulton Lee (Smoothjazz.Com - The
Hello lex everyone else,
on 27-Nov-2005 at 13:00 you (lex) wrote:
Do I need to archive mail or something to have the bat! running normal
again, or is there a fault somewhere. Normally, I use to have my email
client on oall the time i'm behind a pc, that isn't possible now...
Do you run the
Hello Roman,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 01:42:54 -0500 GMT (27/11/2005, 13:42 +0700 GMT),
Roman Katzer wrote:
RK I meant the boxed retail versions of TB that had a sticker on them with an
RK email address that was ready to use.
I never knew there are boxed retail versions of TB.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Hello Alexander,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 10:40:54 +0100 GMT (27/11/2005, 16:40 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Does anybody know whether Roelof's tip *should* have worked?
ASK If the .bin file is re-built to already contain enough information that
ASK makes it a .tbb file, yes. I've done this
Hello Thomas Fernandez everyone else,
on 27-Nov-2005 at 14:41 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote:
Does anybody know whether Roelof's tip *should* have worked?
ASK If the .bin file is re-built to already contain enough information that
ASK makes it a .tbb file, yes. I've done this myself before, and
Hello Alexander,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:17:09 +0100 GMT (27/11/2005, 21:17 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
So that means the .bin file is really corrupted. :-(
ASK IRC the .tbb (and .bin) file is more or less a Unix mailbox with
ASK additional headers or message separators for TB. This
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, November 26, 2005, 8:33:45 PM, you wrote:
IAW http://www.hhdsoftware.com/
I didn't know there were so many free hex editors out there. Thanks!
PSPad also has a built in hex editor in addition to a really great
syntax highlighting text editor.
http://www.pspad.com
--
Hello Leif,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 08:00:28 -0700 GMT (27/11/2005, 22:00 +0700 GMT),
Leif Gregory wrote:
LG PSPad also has a built in hex editor in addition to a really great
LG syntax highlighting text editor.
LG http://www.pspad.com
I've downloaded it and will give it a spin.
--
Cheers,
Hello Rich!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 9:03 AM, you wrote:
I too have run into the We only support Outlook Express tech
support policy. In such a case I'd tell them to help me setup my
Outlook Express then, once that works, began the work of transposing
the info from OE to TB.
Yes, good
Hello Mary,
I was lucky to find a vet able to save my long-time pet companion.
I'm glad to hear that Mary. I know what it means to lose a long-time
pet, I've always had dogs and I've been through that several times.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat!
Hello rich gregory everyone else,
on 27-Nov-2005 at 18:14 you (rich gregory) wrote:
a little patience would have
been all that was necessary
Come on, there was one post that was rude, the others were mostly helpful,
you're sounding as if the poor guy was slapped with fish by everyone...
--
Hello Rich!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 11:14 AM, you wrote:
MB But I don't expect to see him back here ...
Too bad he hit us up w/ that Q during our holidays. Neither was I as
available, and unable to help. I do understand that he was less than
accurate on several points but still, a
Hello Alexander!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 11:30 AM, you wrote:
... a little patience would have been all that was necessary ...
Come on, there was one post that was rude, the others were mostly
helpful, you're sounding as if the poor guy was slapped with fish by
everyone...
The thing
Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
on 27-Nov-2005 at 18:42 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
Because I might have been able to break everything down into simple
enough steps to help Bob be successful
He wanted to use one email address with two programs... respect if you're
able to break this down into
Hello Alexander!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 11:59 AM, you wrote:
Because I might have been able to break everything down into simple
enough steps to help Bob be successful
He wanted to use one email address with two programs... respect if
you're able to break this down into simple enough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 26 Nov 2005,
@ @ at 14:05:07 -0500, when rich gregory wrote:
S Not perhaps a very direct answer/solution, but one (just one, might be
S there are better ones) suggestion is
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, November 27, 2005, 8:43:17 AM, you wrote:
I've downloaded it and will give it a spin.
You'll like it. In some ways it's very similar to TB. There's a whole
ton going on under the hood if you really want to get into it. You can
tweak and twiddle until it's just perfect. You
Hi lex,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, at 04:00:35 [GMT-0800] (which was 23:00:35 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
My mail folders are rather large, and since a while, as soon as I
start The Bat! I've got my cpu working at 100%.
Check to see if you have a heap of temporary files left behind by Bat!
Hello all,
I've seen that the last stable version of The Bat has the following
release note:
[*] Keeping Shift or Ctrl keys change behaviour of Reply to All
toolbar button the same way as for Reply button (needs editing or
deletion of TBUser.DEF, though)
Does anyone know what it means? What
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:14:57 +1100, John Phillips wrote
Check to see if you have a heap of temporary files left behind by
Bat! This slows things down and consumes processor time.
Ok thanks, as well other posters. I downloaded the new version and tried
again. I get all kind of strange stuff
Hello Philippe!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 2:07 PM, you wrote:
I've seen that the last stable version of The Bat has the following
release note:
[*] Keeping Shift or Ctrl keys change behaviour of Reply to All
toolbar button the same way as for Reply button (needs editing or
deletion of
Hello lex!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 2:12 PM, you wrote:
Ok thanks, as well other posters. I downloaded the new version and
tried again. I get all kind of strange stuff now. For exmaple, mails
not getting downloaded (it gets stuck at 100% when downloading of
the server). The mail that
Hello lex!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 2:12 PM, you wrote:
I did try to cure the folders, it said ok and it gave some error
message.
Did you compress them?
I have The Bat! set to compress all my folders on exit. It makes it
faster running.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.63.05 (Beta) on
Sunday, November 27, 2005, lex wrote:
About deleting temporary files: how do i find them?
Start, then run, type %temp% (without the qoutes), sometimes there's a
%tmp% too -- normally it's the same folder. Never wrong to try both.
The files should be called bat*.tmp or something like that
--
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:21:34 -0600, Mary Bull wrote
Are you using IMAP or POP3?
These problems sound like some things that some users see with IMAP.
I haven't seen them using POP3.
pop3...
--
Lex Thoonen
Pêng Smart Web Design - http://www.peng.nl
Gran Canaria Info -
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:30:33 +0100, Urban wrote
Start, then run, type %temp%
The files should be called bat*.tmp or something like that
869 items, is that a lot?
anyway, deleted them... Now off testing again.
--
Lex Thoonen
Pêng Smart Web Design - http://www.peng.nl
Gran Canaria Info
Sunday, November 27, 2005, lex wrote:
869 items, is that a lot?
I'd say that 869 bat items is quite a lot, yes.
IIRC, there were some solutions to clearing the %TEMP% automatically in
an earlier discussion on TBUDL... (searching)...
Yes, here it is; the subject is TB! attachment display
Lately I've problems with replying to posts like the one below.
There is no quoted text.
Same problem with messages that contain something similar to:
--- XXX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a forwarded message
From: forex5x [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, November 26,
39 matches
Mail list logo
