Hello Barry,
Friday, July 8, 2005, 2:36:40 AM, you wrote:
B> Hi
B> I just downloaded build 30 from the Ritlabs web site and installed over my
B> copy of build 25 and Bayesit 0.8.1
B> For some reason the installer removed my copy of Bayesit but didn't replace
B> it. I tried installing a download
Hello Jeff,
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 7:04:30 PM, you wrote:
JG> Hello Group
JG> I'm still struggling a bit with this plugin (v 0.8.1).
JG> It seems to regard everything as spam except this list, which I've
JG> managed to whitelist. It's a pain because I am selling my first item
JG> on eBay and I'
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 9:51:36 PM, you wrote:
PB> I rely mainly on positive filters in the bat, like "known", and can
PB> live with that.
That is the issue. These spam messages were ending up in my 'known'
folder even though they did not come from a known sender.
--
Best regards,
Hello MAU,
Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 1:41:56 PM, you wrote:
M> Hello MikeD,
>> Using The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1
M> You are using a beta version, you should post this in the TBBeta list.
Ooops ... sorry. Grabbed the wrong email
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Hello All,
Just as of today I have been hammered by a significant increase in
spam. I can deal with that. But one thing did confuse me. One of the
spam messages ended up in my "known" folder and I checked my address
book three times to be sure and neither the From nor the To address
appear in my a
Hello Scott,
Friday, April 1, 2005, 1:27:21 PM, you wrote:
SF> Hello MikeD,
SF> Thursday, March 31, 2005, 10:29:35 AM, you wrote:
M3>> [...] When I first started having this problem, I not only
M3>> 'un-installed' the add-in, I deleted the all the training
M3>> data and retrained. That did not
Hello Scott,
Thursday, March 31, 2005, 1:00:23 PM, you wrote:
SF> Hello MikeD,
SF> Thursday, March 31, 2005, 3:53:54 AM, you wrote:
M3>> Hmm ... I have nothing else to suggest at this point. But you
M3>> might want to look at the "Doesn't download Mail" thread and
M3>> see if that has any appli
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 1:35:59 PM, you wrote:
SF> Hello MikeD,
SF> Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 5:08:46 AM, you wrote:
M3>> I would be interested in hearing what (if anything) you find out.
SF> It seems to be 2 accounts (rest OK) and the problem is
SF> consistent, ie the mail is
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 4:02:02 AM, you wrote:
SF> Hello MikeD,
SF> Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 11:49:39 AM, you wrote:
M3>> I am not sure if the problem is triggered by a certain email
M3>> message format or not. But my *guess* is that it has
M3>> something to do with a miss-forme
Hello Scott,
Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 12:02:41 PM, you wrote:
SF> Hello TBUDL,
SF> I just clean installed everything, and imported my installation
SF> from a backup, but now BayesIt is giving me trouble.
SF> Sometimes all my messages will download but not be imported,
SF> then the connectio
Hello John,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 4:02:30 PM, you wrote:
JM> Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
JM> It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
JM> It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
JM> spam.
JM>
Spammers have gotten "hip" to h
Hello Dave,
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 9:42:05 AM, you wrote:
DT> Thanks Mike
Always happy to be able to give back in some small way for all the
help I have gotten
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows ME 4.90 Build
Hello Dave,
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:24:51 AM, you wrote:
DT> How do you install this Bayesit filter?
First unarchive the TBP file someplace in either the TB executable
tree or the data tree. I put mine in Prg_files/TheBat/Bayesit
Go to Options / PLugins.
Click add and then point at the
Hello Dan,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 8:46:34 AM, you wrote:
DG> Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here) Dave Thomas wrote:
>> Where do I find the link to the latest [Bayesit] version
DG> You might want to try
DG> www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.lng .
I believe that i
Hello Dave,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 6:31:10 AM, you wrote:
DT> Where do I find the link to the latest version
Sorry, I no longer have that link handy and I cannot read the site
well enough to find the link
Hopefully someone else will be able to post a copy of the link for
you.
--
Best reg
Hello WilWilWil,
Thursday, October 28, 2004, 4:58:36 PM, you wrote:
M3>> There is *NO* bug free software that is as complicated as an email
M3>> client. OE has bugs, Eudora has bugs, Agent Mail has bugs, pegusus
M3>> has bugs ... see a pattern here?
W> I agree with you but you don't have to pa
Hello z5worg,
Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 10:20:45 PM, you wrote:
zzc> Wednesday, October 27, 2004, WilWilWil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zzc> I bought v2 last January; but haven't really used it yet. I just
zzc> installed it on a new computer last week. I am still using v1.62. What
zzc> kinds of
Hello WilWilWil,
Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 5:33:35 PM, you wrote:
M>> You fared better than I did. I emailed Ritlabs on 4th September, having
M>> purchased my version 2 licence on 20th August. They only took two
M>> days to reply to me with:-
RL >>> You are not obliged to upgrade to the 3.xx
Hello G.,
Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 9:24:45 AM, you wrote:
GM> I'm sure this is a FAQ but I haven't been paying attention...
GM> Just upgraded to TB 3.01, no problems, but BayesIt has
GM> stopped spotting ANY spam - not that it ever was any good at it
GM> (about 1 in 3 with 2.x). Do I have to re
Hello Stuart,
Saturday, October 16, 2004, 9:06:23 AM, you wrote:
SC> Michael is using Version 3 which does not have the "alternative" tab.
I guess I will have to bite the bullet soon and move up to 3
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v
Hello Michael,
Friday, October 15, 2004, 11:49:11 PM, you wrote:
MLW> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MLW> Hash: SHA1
MLW> Hi,
MLW> I get some pretty rude email spam. I have setup a filter to delete
MLW> from the server anything with certain words in the subject. Many of
MLW> these still ge
Hello Greg,
Sunday, October 10, 2004, 8:21:19 PM, you wrote:
GS> Hello MikeD,
GS> Thursday, October 7, 2004, 10:11:36 AM, MikeD (3) wrote:
>> Click Add and then point it at the 'bayesit' folder and select the
>> 'bayesit.tbp'
GS> Done.
>> That w
Hello Dave,
Thursday, October 7, 2004, 8:53:29 AM, you wrote:
DT> Hi there, how do I configure the filter in version 3?
You have to unarchive it and it's support files. I keep mine in a
folder called (big surprise) 'bayesit' that is in the 'TheBat' program
tree.
Next you start TB and go to Opt
Hello Neal,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:58:14 PM, you wrote:
NL> One way is to look at the statistics BayesIt generates. The would be
NL> found here:
Options >> Preferences > Plug-ins > BayesIt > Information
NL> Highlight the BayesIt plugin and click the info button and you will
NL> see a la
Hello Steve,
Saturday, September 25, 2004, 7:10:59 PM, you wrote:
SMK> Neal,
SMK> I'm, using 06.6, which I thought was the latest version. BayesIt hasn't
SMK> worked well for me since the version that came with The Bat 2.12; I don't
SMK> remember its version number.
That would 0.5.11. It is w
Hello admin,
Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 3:35:34 PM, you wrote:
>> Hello WilWilWil,
>> Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 6:21:30 AM, you wrote:
W>>> Io,
W>>> How do you catch the information that a new release of bayesit exists ?
>> Well since it is still a "work in progress", the most current r
Hello WilWilWil,
Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 6:21:30 AM, you wrote:
W> Io,
W> How do you catch the information that a new release of bayesit exists ?
Well since it is still a "work in progress", the most current release
notices are posted to the Beta Test list.
--
Best regards,
MikeD
Hello aceman,
Monday, September 20, 2004, 3:26:43 PM, you wrote:
>> Keep in mind that 0.6.6 is not a complete bayesit install. It is
>> designed to replace a couple of files in the 0.6.5 install. I am not
>> sure it will work correctly over top of 0.6.4 or earlier versions.
abc> Yes, that is
Hello aceman,
Monday, September 20, 2004, 10:35:18 AM, you wrote:
abc> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit066.rar
abc> or if you *really* want 0.6.4
abc> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit064.rar
Keep in mind that 0.6.6 is not a complete bayesit install. It is
design
Hello Joe,
Monday, September 20, 2004, 9:37:45 AM, you wrote:
J> Hello,
J> I am having a crash about twice a day and was told the problem is with BayesIt!
0.6.00.
J> I was also told that the problem is fixed in 0.6.4. Where/how
J> can I get the upgrade to BayesIt?
Actually look for ver 0.6.5
58 PM, you wrote:
BM> On Tue 7-Sep-04 1:58pm -0400, MikeD (3) wrote:
>> Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 12:38:31 PM, you wrote:
BM>>> On Mon 6-Sep-04 7:56pm -0400, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
>>>> Since the 5.10 or so, I have added the discussion and newsletter
>>>
Hello Bill,
Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 12:38:31 PM, you wrote:
BM> On Mon 6-Sep-04 7:56pm -0400, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
>> Since the 5.10 or so, I have added the discussion and newsletter
>> groups to the whitelist, which has sped up mail collection even more.
>> This list generates a hundred
Hello Paul,
Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 8:07:07 AM, you wrote:
PJ> Do you keep a folder of spam to train it with then? I delete all mine
PJ> every week or so.
Right, I have both a ham and a spam folder with messages for training.
I empty all my junk folders into the Spam folder and all my Trash
Hello Terrance,
Monday, September 6, 2004, 11:50:53 PM, you wrote:
TH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
TH> Hash: SHA1
TH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
TH> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
TH> iD8DBQFBPT4PD9yJdiuqiRERAsxtAJsGTU1Ij+G6b6vV9O+vEEqbIKz3cgCfU9wy
TH> VZQabA+io6pmZOlPp2WGFfA=
TH>
Hello Allister,
Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 1:09:33 AM, you wrote:
AJ> Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 12:56:34 PM, Michael wrote:
MLW>> No Bayes based filter will ever be 100% perfect. I believe, however,
MLW>> that BayesIT is a very good implementation of the Bayes calculations.
AJ> It is such a
Hello Michael,
Monday, September 6, 2004, 7:56:34 PM, you wrote:
MLW> Since the 5.10 or so, I have added the discussion and newsletter
MLW> groups to the whitelist, which has sped up mail collection even more.
MLW> This list generates a hundred or more email a day, and those are just
MLW> passed
Hello Paul,
Monday, September 6, 2004, 5:23:19 PM, you wrote:
>> The key there
>> seems to be to completely remove all traces of the old one before
>> installing and trying to train the new one.
PJ> So I have to retrain each time I upgrade the BayesIT plugin. That
PJ> seems rather painful. I
Hello Paul,
Monday, September 6, 2004, 2:13:39 PM, you wrote:
PJ>>> Can anyone point me to info regarding BayesIT and BayesFilter.
PJ>>> What is the difference between them?
>> BayesIT will actually work if you can get it installed. I've never
>> been able to get the other one to do anything ex
Hello Lars,
Saturday, September 4, 2004, 6:26:04 PM, you wrote:
>> Besides "adjusting" access for the plugin, you may need to 'fiddle'
>> some other tb file rights as well.
LS> I have tried to give the users write rights to the
LS> installation folder of The Bat!. But that seems not to be the
LS
Hello Lars,
Saturday, September 4, 2004, 12:41:16 PM, you wrote:
>> It is also possible that it is just a permissions problem on the plug
>> in file itself that needs to be changed.
LS> Could be. Has no one else this problem, or are all people out
LS> there working with admin rights for their
Hello Lars,
Saturday, September 4, 2004, 7:43:12 AM, you wrote:
LS> Hello,
LS> when I try to add the BayesIt! filter to the list of anti
LS> spam plugings (by selecting it in the installation folder of The
LS> Bat!), I get an error message, as long as the user has no
LS> administrator rights (w
Hello Sean,
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 10:19:58 AM, you wrote:
SH> Is the new version of Bayesit (bundled with TB3.0) supposed to work
SH> with IMAP, or is it POP only?
It *SHOULDN'T* matter. But, as with all things, YMMV.
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PRO
Hello Andre,
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 10:08:58 AM, you wrote:
AW> Hello Dan,
AW> On 2 Sep 2004 at 18:35:40 -0400 GMT [00:35 CEST] you wrote:
DG>> BayesIt's history.txt says:
DG>> Is anyone successfully using BayesIt 0.6.0 with TheBat! 2.12.00?
AW> Yes.
FWIW, I see on the beta list that 0.
Hello Dan,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 5:35:40 PM, you wrote:
DG> BayesIt's history.txt says:
DG> "Version 0.6.0 - this version is written to be included in
DG> The Bat! 3.0 distribution"
DG> Is anyone successfully using BayesIt 0.6.0 with TheBat! 2.12.00?
I have not tried it. I jus
Hello Dennis,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 10:46:13 PM, you wrote:
DWG> Top posting good. Bottom posting annoying!
I think we are in the minority, thought
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000
__
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 6:53:44 PM, you wrote:
SS> Howdy,
SS> I deleted all traces of old filters in the sorting office, as well as
SS> all traces of any anti-spam plugin. (Including the new version)
SS> I then noticed that my filters started working again.
SS> That one problem
Hello Anne,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:17:24 AM, you wrote:
A> I've been using TB! under Xandros Linux (via Crossover Office)
A> for the better part of 6 months and it has worked fine for me.
A> Now I have a major problem with the upgrade to v3... I cannot
A> install it onto my Linux box.
Hello WilWilWil,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:48:26 AM, you wrote:
W> ==Original message text===
W> From: MikeD (3) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
W> To: Graham Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
W> Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 3:55:46 PM
W> Subject: [the
Hello Eddie,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:32:22 AM, you wrote:
EC> Dear MikeD,
EC>-->> Mittwoch, 1. September 2004, 16:08:19:
PC>>> [http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit053.rar]
>> That is a bit out of date. 0.5.5 is the one that is included in the
>> 2.12 TB distribution and
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:05:41 AM, you wrote:
SS> Howdy,
SS> Due to my desktop crashing completly (Motherboard, HD all fried, power
SS> surge) I was not using The Bat to download my email and was instead
SS> using web based for 2.5 months. In that period, I only used web based
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 8:26:42 AM, you wrote:
MP>> The way I read it is that Home Edition is The Bat! and
MP>> Professional Edition is SecureBat. Yes?
MDP> Pretty much, yes!
Except from what I am reading on the beta list, the 'seccureBat' Stuff
isn't all there yet. You have
Hello Nick,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 7:29:31 AM, you wrote:
ND> Hello,
ND> I'm not quite sure where I'm going with this, but:
ND> I wonder what Ritlabs' revenues are, and how they break down? New vs.
ND> repeat business.
ND> I suspect that v3 will result in a wave fresh positive reviews i
Hello Paul,
Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 8:14:04 PM, you wrote:
PC> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:59:29 +0200, Andre Wichartz wrote:
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote:
>>
>> PK> Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download?
>>
>> PK> The si
Hello Graham,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 5:13:28 AM, you wrote:
GD> Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ?
The best suggestion that I have heard is stay with 2.12. It works
well enough for me (but I don't need IMAP ... which was promised for 2
... wasn't it? :-/ )
--
Best reg
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, August 29, 2004, 4:00:54 AM, you wrote:
TA> Hi fladdermöss,
TA> I've recently installed the latest version of BayesIT (0.5.11). Since
TA> then I've experienced sudden crashes with The Bat! I would like to
TA> retrain BayesIT from scratch since I think that's the problem.
T
Hello Christopher,
Friday, August 27, 2004, 12:32:48 PM, you wrote:
CB> Hi List,
CB> I installed bayesit 0.5.5 about a week ago. I trained it up
CB> on the folder of junk mail I had collected, and on the non-junk.
CB> Then every morning, I do a manual 'mark as junk'. To date, my junk
CB> folder
Hello Terry,
Thursday, August 26, 2004, 11:19:40 AM, you wrote:
TGM> Hello Pete,
TGM> Thursday, August 26, 2004, 8:56:54 AM, you wrote:
>> That did the trick.
>> Is there another SPAM plugin available?
TGM> Did you happen to upgrade TB! or BayesIt! lately?
TGM> I had this problem when I upgr
Hello,
Just installed Bayesit 0.5.11 and had a couple of problems that I
thought I would share. I have managed to work around them, but
hopefully it is something that can get fixed in the future.
After I deleted all traces of the old version, I installed the new
one, then started TB and added th
Hello George,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 11:35:29 AM, you wrote:
GM> DZ-Jay wrote:
DJ>> Some time around 08/15/2004 11:13:49, I think I heard Stuart Cuddy say:
>>>What is Graham?
>>>What is Spam-grade?
DJ>> AFAIK, spam-grade would be the probability of it being spam, and
DJ>> Graham, I s
Hello DZ-Jay,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 10:20:52 AM, you wrote:
DJ> Some time around 08/15/2004 09:24:56, I think I heard MikeD (3) say:
DJ>>> I was too. I just upgraded yesterday to 0.5.9 and I haven't
DJ>>> noticed a difference. It does provide a white/black list, w
Hello Pete,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 9:52:14 AM, you wrote:
PH> Sunday, August 15, 2004, 7:44:17 AM, you wrote:
AW>> Hello MikeD,
AW>> On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote:
AW>> Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you
AW>> upgraded?
PH> What are
Hello DZ-Jay,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 9:31:38 AM, you wrote:
DJ> Some time around 08/15/2004 09:23:46, I think I heard MikeD (3) say:
>> Hello Andre,
>> Sunday, August 15, 2004, 6:44:17 AM, you wrote:
AW>>> Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files
Hello DZ-Jay,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 8:12:23 AM, you wrote:
DJ> Some time around 08/14/2004 22:24:58, I think I heard MikeD (3) say:
>> What settings are you using? Under the old version (0.4gm) I had it
>> trained and was getting most spam caught, no false positives with a
&
Hello Andre,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 6:44:17 AM, you wrote:
AW> Hello MikeD,
AW> On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote:
AW> Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you
AW> upgraded?
Funny, that. When I first upgraded I did not and it seemed to work
Hello DZ-Jay,
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 5:31:59 PM, you wrote:
DJ> Some time around 08/14/2004 15:47:24, I think I heard MikeD say:
>> The settings I used to use don't seem to work any more and I either
>> get everything filtered as junk or nothing is filtered as junk. I
>> trained it with abou
Hello Chenoa,
Monday, June 21, 2004, 12:29:31 PM, you wrote:
C> So how many spam and non-spam messages have you marked?
I was at upwards of 1,000 posts in spam and almost that many ham posts
before I was getting solid results, but this was under the earlier
build. I am a bit out of date at the m
Hello Marten,
Tuesday, April 20, 2004, 11:16:06 AM, you wrote:
MG> Why it is under the View Menu I do NOT know but then
Doh!
Umm ... thanks. Don't know why I didn't see it there originally.
Probably 'cuz I didn't expect to see it there I guess :-/
--
Best regards,
MikeD
Hello Marten,
Tuesday, April 20, 2004, 8:27:21 AM, you wrote:
MG> On Tuesday, April 20, 2004 at 2:13:52 PM, you wrote:
>> Hello Marek,
>> Monday, April 19, 2004, 5:24:55 PM, you wrote:
MM>>> via options "Mark as Junk" and "Mark as not Junk" in Specials menu.
>> Since we have to use this now
Hello Marek,
Monday, April 19, 2004, 5:24:55 PM, you wrote:
MM> via options "Mark as Junk" and "Mark as not Junk" in Specials menu.
Since we have to use this now for all the training ... is there a way
to make these two functions more accessible ... like by assigning a
key to each?
--
Best re
Hello Joseph,
Friday, March 12, 2004, 10:18:06 AM, you wrote:
JN> I've been happy using SpamPal and some plug-ins, including the
JN> Bayesian filter, with TB! Is there any reason I should consider
JN> switching to Bayesit?
I prefer the plug in for my own particular reasons ... not wanting to
Hello Dan,
Wednesday, March 3, 2004, 3:17:25 PM, you wrote:
DG> Thank you, Mike.
Hey, no problem. That's why we hang out here ... to help each other
out.
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000
_
Hello Lawrence,
Wednesday, March 3, 2004, 11:14:17 AM, you wrote:
LJ> Is there any way to keep the plug-in from popping up and
LJ> grabbing focus every few milliseconds as mail comes in? Its a
LJ> battle trying to do any work while the plug-in keeps snatching
LJ> focus.
Hmmm ... it doesn't do
Hello Dan,
Wednesday, March 3, 2004, 9:04:50 AM, you wrote:
DG> Wed, 3 Mar 2004 03:46:37 + (10:46 PM EST Tue here) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
>> @2-Mar-2004, 22:31 -0500 (03-Mar 03:31 UK time) Michael Rudnick [MR]
>> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MR>>> Is there anything else I can do to cus
Hello Peter,
Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 3:41:25 PM, you wrote:
PO> Up to the 2.04.04 release BayesIt 0.4gm worked quite fine here, with a
PO> score level of 40.
PO> Starting with 2.04.04, BayesIt 0.4gm SE hardly catches spam anymore. It
PO> has been trained with something like 3000 spam message
Hello John,
Sunday, February 15, 2004, 4:34:27 PM, you wrote:
JE> Hi TBUDL,
JE> I understand it's possible to run TB using the WINE
JE> code on Linux systems. What is the general verdict on
JE> how well this works?
I have not tried it since the 1.4x version and did not do extensive
testing, bu
Hello all,
I have had something strange happen twice now, so I thought I would
ask and see if anyone has any ideas.
I am subscribed to a mail list much like this one. Twice now when I
have replied to emails from the list (going back to the list), the
messages ended up being in "base-64" plain te
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 30, 2004, 9:27:04 AM, you wrote:
SH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SH> Hash: SHA1
SC>> Yes. There is a file called bayesit.log in your documents and settings
SC>> folder, name, application data, bayesit (in Windows 2000). It has info
SC>> like the following:
SH
Hello Stuart,
Monday, January 26, 2004, 5:29:54 AM, you wrote:
SH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SH> Hash: SHA1
M3>>> Look in Options, Preferences. Open the Anti-spam item and near the
M3>>> bottom are the two thresholds. I don't auto delete anything. I have
M3>>> the transfer to junk at
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 9:09:37 AM, you wrote:
SH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SH> Hash: SHA1
M3>> I also had to crank the
M3>> threshold *way* down to get reasonable results.
SH> How do I do that?
Look in Options, Preferences. Open the Anti-spam item and near the
botto
Hi Stuart
On Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 1:42 PM, shemming wrote:
>> When should bayesit start doing it's stuff?
It didn't start working well for me until I had about 1,000 messages
in **both** spam and ham for it to work from. I also had to crank the
threshold *way* down to get reasonable res
Hello Vishal,
Monday, January 12, 2004, 4:28:45 AM, you wrote:
VN> Hi Granville
VN> Sunday, January 11, 2004, 9:50:31 PM, you wrote:
GC>> Will The Bat! run with these programmes.
VN> Not directly, but maybe under Wine.
Yes, I have gotten it to run under Wine with Mandrake 9.1. But I did
not
Hello Steve,
Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 6:03:47 AM, you wrote:
SM> Hi guys,
SM> Anyone have any experience configuring TB! to work with ZoneAlarm
SM> personal firewall and a local mail server (actually I am using Computer
SM> Associates EZ Personal Firewall but from what I can see it is exact
Hello Mark,
Can you filter on one of the other parts of the message? If there is
a link, maybe the URL ... what about some part of the "From" address?
But the people that suggest a more sophisticated filter like Bayesit
might have the better idea
--
Best regards,
MikeD
Hello John,
Wednesday, November 12, 2003, 1:00:34 PM, you wrote:
JP> Hi Bat! Fans,
JP> Installed the Bayesit filter and "trained" it according to
JP> instructions etc.
JP> However since installed, I could not get a connection to my ISP.
JP> As soon as I removed the filter, no problems at all.
Hello Freddie,
Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 2:14:01 PM, you wrote:
FF> Hello All,
FF>I know this subject has come up several times in the past, but I
FF>was wondering, if a full fledged conduit for the Palm operating
FF>system is not likely, and not being a programmer myself, if it
Hello FJ,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:04:14 AM, you wrote:
FdB> Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into
FdB> the final 2.0 version?
FdB> I tried to look for this info on the ritlabs site but I could not find
FdB> any reference.
Work continues on the Bayesian plu
Hello Vishal,
Monday, September 1, 2003, 12:29:47 PM, you wrote:
V> Hi,
V> I know, I know, this has been discussed before. But has ANYONE managed to get TB
V> to do automatic mail checks with Zonealarm Pro installed? I'd rather not shift
V> to Kerio yet as ZA is otherwise an excellent firewall.
Hello Tomi,
Friday, August 22, 2003, 2:53:42 PM, you wrote:
icn> I am sick and tired of having to kill the TB process. This has happened in
icn> most/all versions I have ever used and I reported it many times. Oddly, the
icn> support personnel I have always been in contact with suck.
I used to h
Hello DZ-Jay,
Tuesday, August 19, 2003, 5:11:02 AM, you wrote:
DJ> Some time around 8/18/2003 22:40:50, I think I heard Jack LaRosa say:
>> Hello Bats!,
>> Anyone care to hazard a guess as to what the problem might be?
DJ> It happens to me too, but so far I have attribute it to PopFile
DJ> (oh,
89 matches
Mail list logo
