Re: Message filtering problem

Hi MAU, On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:36:40 PM you wrote: M> You don't need to quote his whole message just to ask that, do you? M> ;-) No, and thank you for the reminder. -- Regards, Maggie Haste makes waste. Running Windows 7, and emailing with The Bat! 7

Re: Message filtering problem

Hello MAU, On Friday, August 12, 2022 you wrote: M> Hello Jack, >> Have you tried any other options besides "sender"? M> You don't need to quote his whole message just to ask that, do you? M> ;-) My sincerest apologies to the list. I know better and simply was not thinking (again) when I repl

Re: Message filtering problem

Particularly annoying when the one line of actual new text is after the quote. Adrian Friday, August 12, 2022, 7:36:40 PM, MAU miguel.ur...@gmail.com wrote: > You don't need to quote his whole message just to ask that, do you? Current version

Re: Message filtering problem

Hello Jack, > Have you tried any other options besides "sender"? You don't need to quote his whole message just to ask that, do you? ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial (Madrid)- Spain) Using The Bat! Version 9.5.1 (64-bit) Cur

Re: Message filtering problem

Hello Chris, On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 you wrote: CW> 10 August 2022 CW> I am having filtering problems but do not understand why, as before CW> upgrading to v10. I saw no issues. Here are the headers for a message that CW> does not get filtered correctly, it is instead left

Message filtering problem

10 August 2022 I am having filtering problems but do not understand why, as before upgrading to v10. I saw no issues. Here are the headers for a message that does not get filtered correctly, it is instead left placed in my new mail folder.   Return-Path:  Delivered-To: ch...@chriswilson.tv

Re: New filters/re-filtering not working

Hello again, I wrote: > Any ideas as to what's going on here? Never mind. I think I've got it sorted. I just needed to reorder the priority of the filters, as one of them was to "park" all messages. Once I made sure all other filters came before the "park" filter, all is well again. :) -- M

New filters/re-filtering not working

Hello, I just created a new POP3 account, and created new folders into which I'd like to filter messages. After creating a new filter, and I try to "re-filter" the Inbox, nothing is filtered into the new folder, even though I know there are plenty of eligible messages. In all the years I've been

Problem solved: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello Thomas, On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 14:57:50 +0630 GMT (08-Jun-18, 14:57 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Hello MFPA, > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 06:51:16 +0100 GMT (08-Jun-18, 12:21 +0700 GMT), > MFPA wrote: >> On Tuesday 5 June 2018 at 7:26:19 AM, in >> , Thomas Fernandez wrote:- >>> Yes. But

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello MFPA, On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 06:51:16 +0100 GMT (08-Jun-18, 12:21 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: > On Tuesday 5 June 2018 at 7:26:19 AM, in > , Thomas Fernandez wrote:- >> Yes. But since the mails are arriving there by >> filter and not by >> downloading, these filters are not triggered.

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hi On Tuesday 5 June 2018 at 7:26:19 AM, in , Thomas Fernandez wrote:- > Yes. But since the mails are arriving there by > filter and not by > downloading, these filters are not triggered. Is the option "continue processing with other filters" selected in your filter that moves the me

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello Thomas, Tuesday, June 5, 2018, 7:13:25 PM, you wrote: > In that case, maybe I should try and delete the filter and just > recreate it. I'll come back with the result. > By the way, I am talking about POP accounts. I would have thought they would work better. Mine are all IMAP accoun

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

> platform they use, that filtering is a bit flaky. I have some accounts that > will > automatically filter my messages 90 % of the time, but then refuse to filter > identical messages no matter what I do. Its like The Bat just quits filtering > at > some point. > I also

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello Thomas, Tuesday, June 5, 2018, 10:16:39 AM, you wrote: > Yes, manual refiltering works. Hmmm. Unfortunately I find that depending on the ISP and probably what IMAP platform they use, that filtering is a bit flaky. I have some accounts that will automatically filter my messages 90 %

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello Stuart, On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:04:17 -0500 GMT (05-Jun-18, 22:04 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: > Hello Thomas, > Tuesday, June 5, 2018, 9:37:30 AM, you wrote: >> Yes, it is right below account A. Hmmm... > Does the re-filter work. Yes, manual refiltering works. -- Cheers, Thomas. Tr

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello Thomas, Tuesday, June 5, 2018, 9:37:30 AM, you wrote: > Yes, it is right below account A. Hmmm... Does the re-filter work. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm Current version is 8.0.18 | 'Using T

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello Stuart, On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 07:10:58 -0500 GMT (05-Jun-18, 19:10 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: > Hello Thomas, > Tuesday, June 5, 2018, 1:26:19 AM, you wrote: >> Yes. But since the mails are arriving there by filter and not by >> downloading, these filters are not triggered. > It w

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello Thomas, Tuesday, June 5, 2018, 1:26:19 AM, you wrote: > Yes. But since the mails are arriving there by filter and not by > downloading, these filters are not triggered. It works here. I wonder if it matters if account b is below account a in the list of accounts. I'm not sure how an

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello Stuart, On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 20:14:37 -0500 GMT (05-Jun-18, 08:14 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: > Hello Thomas, > Monday, June 4, 2018, 7:52:57 PM, you wrote: >> I Have a filter in one account (A) which moves the mails to another >> account (B), and in that account (B) should sort them int

Re: Sub-filtering across accounts

Hello Thomas, Monday, June 4, 2018, 7:52:57 PM, you wrote: > I Have a filter in one account (A) which moves the mails to another > account (B), and in that account (B) should sort them into folders. So > the sorting into the folders is done by sub-filters > Alas, the sub-filters are not being exe

Sub-filtering across accounts

Hi TBUDL, I Have a filter in one account (A) which moves the mails to another account (B), and in that account (B) should sort them into folders. So the sorting into the folders is done by sub-filters Alas, the sub-filters are not being executed, all mails filtered into account B end up in the I

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, > One question though. Mail with photo content or linkss to web sites, > when transferred to my phone via GMAIL loses that content and appears > plain text, with no photos or clickable links. That makes them fairly > useless. is there a means to have GMAIL show them on the phone a

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, > Again, thanks to all for tips and time spent! You are welcome. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (Els Poblets (Alicante) - Spain) Using The Bat! v8.0.14 My photos at: http://mau.smugmug.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com C

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, Monday, December 11, 2017, 10:27:31 AM, you wrote: > Thanks for the reply Stuart. redirecting wouldn't save a message on the PC > into which the message initially arrived though, would it? Cheers! I think it does, but I haven't tried it. -- Best regards, Stuart

Re[2]: Filtering question

Hello Stuart, On Monday, December 11, 2017, you wrote: > Hello Chris, > Monday, December 11, 2017, 7:29:35 AM, you wrote: >> One question though. Mail with photo content or linkss to web sites, >> when transferred to my phone via GMAIL loses that content and appears >> plain text, with no

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, Monday, December 11, 2017, 7:29:35 AM, you wrote: > One question though. Mail with photo content or linkss to web sites, > when transferred to my phone via GMAIL loses that content and appears > plain text, with no photos or clickable links. That makes them fairly > useless. is th

Re[2]: Filtering question

e rest of them. >> >> Unless you have a good reason to have this option set, untick it in >> all filters and try and see if there is a difference. > Well, did you try? Your answer is important to continue investigating. Sorry, the wife threw a Christmas party so it'

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, > Thanks for the very kind offer, filters text sent by e-mail! Have you done as I suggested in my previous replay 3 days ago? > - I have seen that most (if not all) have the Option "Continue > processing with other filters" set/ticked. Why this? Any reason why > you want

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, >> If you want to, you can send me by PM your complete set of filters as >> text(*) and I will take a look at them. > > Have done so, many thanks! OK, I did receive your PM with your filters. OMG! How many do you have? With so many, I think you may be prone to 'loosing control'

Re[2]: Filtering question

Hello MAU, On Thursday, December 7, 2017, you wrote: > Hello Chris, >> Any further ideas please? > Not much more to suggest, I'm afraid. > - Are you using any Common Filters at all? None > - What about another filter down the list as Stuart Cuddy suggests? I can't see anything although

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, > Any further ideas please? Not much more to suggest, I'm afraid. - Are you using any Common Filters at all? - What about another filter down the list as Stuart Cuddy suggests? If you want to, you can send me by PM your complete set of filters as text(*) and I will take a look at

Re: Filtering question

t; ones the old filter put in the folder "My New Mail". I had thought > this was a common filtering requirement these days, trust me to want > something difficult :( Any further ideas please? Thank you for your > time. Are you sure it is not another filter further down t

Re[2]: Filtering question

ur suggestion, or at least I *THINK* I have followed it correctly, but still I am getting all messages to my main PC forwarded to GMAIL. Not as I wish, just the ones the old filter put in the folder "My New Mail". I had thought this was a common filtering requirement these days

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, > OK, thanks for checking, I must be doing something daft then. Maybe one > of you would be kind enough to look at what I have done here please?? OK, what I would do in your case: Filter: My New Mail Folder Condition: If Sender... or Recipient ... Action: None (Yes NONE)

Re[2]: Filtering question

Hello MAU, OK, thanks for checking, I must be doing something daft then. Maybe one of you would be kind enough to look at what I have done here please?? http://www.gatesgarth.com/filter1.jpg http://www.gatesgarth.com/filter2.jpg Thanks, sorry to be a pain! On Wednesday, December 6, 2017,

Re: Filtering question

Hello MAU, > That should work. I've just tried it and it does work. Only messages > moved to an specific folder are forwarded. And I have verified it once again with my own message to this list. It was moved to folder TBUDL, as it should be, and also forwarded. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Ure

Re: Filtering question

Hello Stuart, >> Can I force TB! to only forward mails that end up in My Mail folder on >> to my GMAIL account? > > You could try adding an additional action to your current filter that after > moving will forward the message. That should work. I've just tried it and it does work. Only message

Re[2]: Filtering question

Hello Stuart, No, but I have altered it now to "Source folder is: one of : ~/~/My Mail Thanks for sticking with me ;) On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, you wrote: > Hello Chris, > Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 11:02:50 AM, you wrote: >> Nope, the sub filter still forwards every incoming ma

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 11:02:50 AM, you wrote: > Nope, the sub filter still forwards every incoming mail to GMAIL. Sorry > to be a pain, any other ideas? I felt sure that would work! Thanks. > Filter order relevant??? In the sub-filter on the folders tab, did you select "Sp

Re[2]: Filtering question

Hello Stuart, Nope, the sub filter still forwards every incoming mail to GMAIL. Sorry to be a pain, any other ideas? I felt sure that would work! Thanks. Filter order relevant??? On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, you wrote: > Hello Chris, > Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 10:38:56 AM, you wro

Re[2]: Filtering question

Hello Stuart, Ahh, silly me, I have never noticed the sub filter option, and, obviously, never tried to use it, i have done as you suggested, we'll see what happens! :) Thanks again Stuart. On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, you wrote: > Hello Chris, > Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 10:38:5

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 10:38:56 AM, you wrote: > But *every* mail that arrived to that PC was forwarded, not just the > ones which had been moved... Even placing that filter at the bottom of > the filter list made no difference, which i thought was odd. Thanks > for the i

Re[2]: Filtering question

Hello Stuart, That's exactly how I did it, a second action after Move To : My Mail Folder I put a second action Forward To: (my GMAIL account) But *every* mail that arrived to that PC was forwarded, not just the ones which had been moved... Even placing that filter at the bottom of the

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 7:01:43 AM, you wrote: > Can I force TB! to only forward mails that end up in My Mail folder on > to my GMAIL account? You could try adding an additional action to your current filter that after moving will forward the message. -- Best regards, Stuar

Filtering question

06 December 2017 I have a new Smartphone (Moto G4) and not being used to modern phones it's taking me a while coming to terms with its abundant features! I want TB! to forward mails that have been already filtered to my personal mail folder (My Mail) on my home desktop PC to GMAIL so I can re

Re: Filtering question

Hi On Friday 22 August 2014 at 5:03:57 PM, in , Chris Wilson wrote: > I have a lot of subscriptions using e-mail to various > Yahoo Groups. It seems they have changed the To: > address to add a "stage" into it, an example : > softroc...@yahoogroups.com to > softroc...@stage.yahoogroups.

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, > the odd thing is these changed To: header lines have ceased arriving, > and none of these are in my Inbox today. I wonder if it was a > temporary glitch at Yahoo? Well, it is good you had not made any changes to your filters. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spa

Re[2]: Filtering question

Hello MAU, On Friday, August 22, 2014, you wrote: > Hello Chris, >> My filter is To: contains softroc...@yahoogroups.com >> >> and it's stopped working. Why is this if I am using "Contains" as a >> filter, it still contains part of the old address? > Because 'softroc...@stage.yahoo

Re: Filtering question

Hello Chris, > My filter is To: contains softroc...@yahoogroups.com > > and it's stopped working. Why is this if I am using "Contains" as a > filter, it still contains part of the old address? Because 'softroc...@stage.yahoogroups.com' does NOT contain 'softroc...@yahoogroups.com'. If

Filtering question

22 August 2014 I have a lot of subscriptions using e-mail to various Yahoo Groups. It seems they have changed the To: address to add a "stage" into it, an example : softroc...@yahoogroups.com to softroc...@stage.yahoogroups.com My filter is To: contains softroc...@yahoogroups.com and

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hi On Saturday 9 November 2013 at 5:39:32 PM, in , Jack S. LaRosa wrote: > The only times I can recall having a message land in > the wrong folder is when the sender changed something, > which had been static, upon which I had been filtering. > An examination of the filter an

Re[2]: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

as hidden behind it. (My filter and my folder for M>> TBUDL messages are both called "The Bat! User Discussion List") M>> That one's title is "Test filters" and its body text is "Messages M>> processed: 1. Messages Filtered: 1. Re-filtering co

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

gt; long line which describes what actions were taken with >> this message as follows: >> Message from MFPA, subject "Re: Feature request? >> Messages display filtering used.", size 6,368 bytes >> filtered (processed by "Processed by: Faux inbox. >> Acti

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

s: > Message from MFPA, subject "Re: Feature request? > Messages display filtering used.", size 6,368 bytes > filtered (processed by "Processed by: Faux inbox. > Actions performed: Move to the folder \\Jack S. > LaRosa\Faux inbox", "Processed by: TBUDL List

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

ssages are both called "The Bat! User Discussion List") M> That one's title is "Test filters" and its body text is "Messages M> processed: 1. Messages Filtered: 1. Re-filtering complete." There are M> "Close" and "Help" buttons. As you

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hi On Friday 8 November 2013 at 10:33:31 PM, in , Chris Wilson wrote: > I was expecting > something that showed the filter, or filters, used to > move or copy it there. I maintain this would be a very > useful feature, hope I haven't misunderstood the "Test > Filters" option, but I believe it d

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

one that was hidden behind it. (My filter and my folder for TBUDL messages are both called "The Bat! User Discussion List") That one's title is "Test filters" and its body text is "Messages processed: 1. Messages Filtered: 1. Re-filtering complete." There are "

Re[2]: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

> Hello Chris, >> I see the same, which is not really telling me how a message was >> routed to that folder. I was expecting something that showed the >> filter, or filters, used to move or copy it there. > Have you ever taken a look at the Account's log? If not, please do. > 'Account/View log'

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hello Chris, > I see the same, which is not really telling me how a message was > routed to that folder. I was expecting something that showed the > filter, or filters, used to move or copy it there. Have you ever taken a look at the Account's log? If not, please do. 'Account/View log', or 'Shi

Re[2]: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

> Hello MFPA, > On Friday, November 08, 2013 you wrote: M>> Right-click any message in The Bat! and select "Test Filters." You can M>> find out the name of each filter that would process the message, and M>> what action would be taken by the filter. > Hmmm. If I follow the above instructions an

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hello MFPA, On Friday, November 08, 2013 you wrote: M> Right-click any message in The Bat! and select "Test Filters." You can M> find out the name of each filter that would process the message, and M> what action would be taken by the filter. Hmmm. If I follow the above instructions and right-c

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hi On Wednesday 6 November 2013 at 9:11:20 PM, in , Chris Wilson wrote: > Not sure if this is an appropriate place to post this, > but here goes. used to be the place but I don't know now that isn't working. > Forte Agent has a very useful feature whereby you

Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

06 November 2013 Not sure if this is an appropriate place to post this, but here goes. Forte Agent has a very useful feature whereby you can view why it has filtered ("Routed" in Agent speak) a message to a certain folder. With lots of folders and the occasional complex filter I feel this wou

Re: 5.4 Quick Filtering

>>Do not use the shift key. Try only Alt+click > That doesn't work either ... and I KNOW it was working at one point ALT and click the MESSAGE and it works (not in the displayed header info) WOO HOO Thanks -- Rick "Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned

Re: 5.4 Quick Filtering

>Do not use the shift key. Try only Alt+click That doesn't work either ... and I KNOW it was working at one point -- Rick Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. John F. Kennedy v5.4 on Windows 6.2 Build 9200 Using all POP accounts I download all

Re: 5.4 Quick Filtering

Hello Rick, BM>> Try holding the Alt-shift while left-clicking on the particular BM>> field in the message list. (Esc to undo.) > > Thanks for the response > That is not working for me for some reason Do not use the shift key. Try only Alt+click -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial

Re: 5.4 Quick Filtering

BM> On Mon, 2013-07-29, Rick wrote: >> I seem to remember that there was SOME keystroke that would filter the >> currently viewed folder base on the message you were viewing (all >> email in the folder from that sender for instance) I am not talking >> about copying to the search box and l

Re: 5.4 Quick Filtering

On Mon, 2013-07-29, Rick wrote: > I seem to remember that there was SOME keystroke that would filter the > currently viewed folder base on the message you were viewing (all > email in the folder from that sender for instance) I am not talking > about copying to the search box and letting i

5.4 Quick Filtering

I seem to remember that there was SOME keystroke that would filter the currently viewed folder base on the message you were viewing (all email in the folder from that sender for instance) I am not talking about copying to the search box and letting it create a tab Does anyone remember this

Re: IMAP issues, was Filtering across accounts

On 7/27/2010 you wrote: >> Hmm. I don't use common filters. Better look at that >> ... maybe that's the ticket! > I find it much easier, since I don't need multiple duplicated filters > when a contact uses several different addresses for me. Yes, that does make sense. Sometimes old habits shoul

Re: IMAP issues, was Filtering across accounts

Hi On Tuesday 27 July 2010 at 12:00:45 AM, in , TheLimit wrote: > Hmm. I don't use common filters. Better look at that > ... maybe that's the ticket! I find it much easier, since I don't need multiple duplicated filters when a contact uses several different addresses for me. > Amazingly - b

Re: IMAP issues, was Filtering across accounts

On 7/26/2010 you wrote: > There is hope. I just tested the latest Alpha and IMAP is starting to look > like > its working much better. rotfl! I mean, it's great to know that and all, but I had hoped there was something I could do now! So should I take that to mean that my SIL has the corre

Re: IMAP issues, was Filtering across accounts

Hello TheLimit, A reminder of what TheLimit typed on: Monday, July 26, 2010 at 16:00:45 GMT -0700 T> One of the things that is driving me mad with this IMAP T> account is that there is always a lag for anything I do, T> except initiating or replying to a message. Deletes T> sometimes take all

Re:IMAP issues, was Filtering across accounts

On 7/26/2010 you wrote: > Hi > On Monday 26 July 2010 at 6:38:14 AM, in > , TheLimit wrote: >> On 7/25/2010 you wrote: >>> Hello Lynn, >>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:25:33 -0700 GMT (26/Jul/10, >>> 3:25 AM +0700 GMT), TheLimit wrote: T I thought the easy way to deal with this would just T

Re: Filtering across accounts

Hi On Monday 26 July 2010 at 6:38:14 AM, in , TheLimit wrote: > On 7/25/2010 you wrote: >> Hello Lynn, >> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:25:33 -0700 GMT (26/Jul/10, >> 3:25 AM +0700 GMT), TheLimit wrote: T>>> I thought the easy way to deal with this would just T>>> be to filter these emails from th

Re: Filtering across accounts

On 7/25/2010 you wrote: > Send us your filter for disection. Here is the redirect filter - > That's a completed different think. The Move filter will move the > message in the DB on your computer, Redirect will send it by SMTP to > the other email address, which by coincidence is also read by y

Re: Filtering across accounts

x27;t. T>> However, this isn't happening, and I can't figure out why. > Send us your filter for disection. Yessir! > My guess is that either the filtering condition isn't what you think > it is, or there is another filter catching that mail and not > continuing with o

Re: Filtering across accounts

ptions T> imply strongly that you can do just this. Yes, this works over here. If the fitler is triggered it performs a Move To action. T> However, this isn't happening, and I can't figure out why. Send us your filter for disection. My guess is that either the filtering cond

Filtering across accounts

Hey Batters - I use a lot of filters here, the filters are one of the things that make it impossible for me to use a different mailer, but I'm having some issues now. I've had to rebuild my whole email db, as I mentioned recently, and I've also acquired a few more accounts. Because of the prob

Re: Inline Filtering

Hallo Chris, On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:15:59 +1000GMT (25-6-2009, 9:15 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C> I think Roelof and MFPA may have tested the wrong thing. Nope. Roelof tested the quick search. -- Groetjes, Roelof The usual reward for saving the world is the chance to do it again. http:/

Re: Inline Filtering

Hi On Thursday 25 June 2009 at 8:15:59 AM, in , Mr Happy wrote: > Ah, I think you may be onto something Robin. I think > Roelof and MFPA may have tested the wrong thing. I can't speak for Roelof but I tested the full search function. I had forgotten about the quick search: it never gave me an

Re: Inline Filtering

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:33:18 +1000, Robin Anson wrote: >On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 at 23:30:26 +1000, Mr Happy wrote: >> Right, I think I've worked out how to reproduce it. If I highlight the >> message that will be shown when I use the filter, when I use the >> filter, the 'no message loaded' does not

Re: Inline Filtering

On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 at 23:30:26 +1000, Mr Happy wrote: > Right, I think I've worked out how to reproduce it. If I highlight the > message that will be shown when I use the filter, when I use the > filter, the 'no message loaded' does not appear (ie it works fine). > However, if I highlight the mess

Re: Inline Filtering

On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:18:11 +0100, MFPA wrote: >Works OK here using v4.0.38 on Windows XP. I just searched for >messages where header contains <753412370.20090621220...@otten.tv>, >which is the message-id of Roelof's post I'm replying to. Obviously it >only found one. When I select that one by c

Re: Inline Filtering

Hi On Sunday 21 June 2009 at 9:00:36 PM, in , Roelof Otten wrote: > Cannot confirm Works OK here using v4.0.38 on Windows XP. I just searched for messages where header contains <753412370.20090621220...@otten.tv>, which is the message-id of Roelof's post I'm replying to. Obviously it only fo

Re: Inline Filtering

Hallo Chris, On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:03:42 +1000GMT (21-6-2009, 15:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C> I think there may be a bug in the inline filtering. Open my inbox, C> click in the filtering field, type in some text (say a persons name), C> it only finds one match. I then clic

Inline Filtering

Hi everyone, I think there may be a bug in the inline filtering. Open my inbox, click in the filtering field, type in some text (say a persons name), it only finds one match. I then click on that message, but all it says in the preview pane is 'no message loaded'. If your filtering fi

Re: IMAP filtering

Dwight, On 21-03-2009 19:52, you wrote in : > I don't understand why you don't sort the mail in your IMAP account > as it arrives there. I do virtually no filtering with TB! anymore. Possible reasons: * If you are unable to do server side filtering * If you sometimes read m

Re: IMAP filtering

our IMAP account > as it arrives there. I do virtually no filtering with TB! anymore. Because I can't. It's my work account and our admin does not allow us to do anything at all besides recieving and sending mail. I guess they haven't figured out the benefits or are reluctant

Re: IMAP filtering

On Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 1:15:06 PM, Peter Fjelsten wrote: >> Has anyone encountered a similar problem or any idea why this happens? I don't understand why you don't sort the mail in your IMAP account as it arrives there. I do virtually no filtering with TB! anymore

Re: IMAP filtering

simbabque, On 17-03-2009 16:11, you wrote in : > Has anyone encountered a similar problem or any idea why this happens? Yes and no. I think it's the weak IMAP implementation (I have a 20/2 MBit line). -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 4.0.39.33 (BETA) Pro MyGate, AVG 12 IMAP (Courier)

IMAP filtering

Hello Tbudl, I've got an IMAP account with lots of mail. I connect through the internet with a 1024/128 kbit/s line. The account is checked in intervals of 10 minutes and it disconnects after 2 minutes. Only mails below a certain size get downloaded completely. For the others, it only gets the hea

Change Defaults for Re-Filtering?

Is there anyplace -- even a registry entry or .ini file -- where I can change the defaults on the "Re-Filter Messages" command so that it does _NOT_ default to log results? -- Jonathan Andrew Sheen http://www.leviathanstudios.com Leviathan of the GEI (Detached.) jsh...@leviathanstudios.com "

Re: Auto filtering of incoming mail

Hi Sefan: I hope all is well with you. I have not heard anything further and am wondering if this will ever get resolved. Jon ___ Using The Bat! v4.0.34.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 -- "What is your ambitions?" — Bush, s

Re: Auto filtering of incoming mail

On Monday, September 15, 2008, 4:48:48 AM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST> Hello Jon, JP>> I sent the files as instructed, but have not heard back. Did you JP>> receive them? ST> Yes I did. Please excuse me for answering so late - I had to ST> resolve some local problems last week... Any update

Re: Auto filtering of incoming mail

ny anomaly so far - ST> everything just works fine, I can add, edit, delete filters and they ST> continue to work. Same here, but they just do not trigger automatically during the download process. If I use the original file (untouched), the filtering is automatic, but for some reason

Re: Auto filtering of incoming mail

On Friday, September 5, 2008, 5:29:11 AM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST> Hello Jon, ST> I need to examine both of the .srb files (the original one and the ST> other one after modification). Could you please send them to me ST> privately? Hi Stefan: I sent the files as instructed, but have not heard

Re: Auto filtering of incoming mail

On Friday, September 5, 2008, 5:29:11 AM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST> Hello Jon, JP>> Thanks for replying. No, they are not set to manual. The funny thing JP>> is that when I restore the account.srb files (I have several accounts) JP>> from version 3.99, the filters all work automatically. ST> I

Re: Auto filtering of incoming mail

Hello Jon, JP> Thanks for replying. No, they are not set to manual. The funny thing JP> is that when I restore the account.srb files (I have several accounts) JP> from version 3.99, the filters all work automatically. I need to examine both of the .srb files (the original one and the other one a

Re: Auto filtering of incoming mail

On Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 12:23:12 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST> Could you please check whether those filters have the Manual Only flag ST> set? Thanks for replying. No, they are not set to manual. The funny thing is that when I restore the account.srb files (I have several accounts) from

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >