Re: RE: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hæ! Saturday, February 5, 2005, 09:31, Jurgen Haug wrote: > HTML *is* used for eMails. But this should not be a general habit. -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | | The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional & K9 v1.28 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

At 09:16 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 4:16pm on Saturday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: > Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote: >> This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail. > No, sorry, this would let many people go a

RE: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Thorvald, Saturday, February 5, 2005, 9:16:42 AM, you wrote: > Hæ! > Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote: >> This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail. > No, sorry, this would let many people go away. > HTML should not be used for email

Re: RE: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hæ! Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote: > This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail. No, sorry, this would let many people go away. HTML should not be used for emails. -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | <http://www.aesir.de/> | The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professi

RE: Remote Images in HTML mail?

ah, I know that. He wants to be able to open the images right in > the menu pane like Thunderbird or Pocomail does. yeah that would be nice, it would have made me convert some people to TB! This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail. Each time I show collegues TB! (am the only o

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 at 20:27:26 -0800, Melissa Reese wrote: >> Is there a way to make TB! display remote images in an HTML mail for >> email that we know is safe? Say from like Amazon.com or Newegg.com? >> I'm trying to convince a friend of mine to switch over to TB! MR

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hi David, On Friday, February 04, 2005, at 8:20:02 PM PST, you wrote: > Is there a way to make TB! display remote images in an HTML mail for > email that we know is safe? Say from like Amazon.com or Newegg.com? > I'm trying to convince a friend of mine to switch over to TB! I d

Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hey All, Is there a way to make TB! display remote images in an HTML mail for email that we know is safe? Say from like Amazon.com or Newegg.com? I'm trying to convince a friend of mine to switch over to TB! -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Hi On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 12:42:22 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: JS>>> Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's JS>>> invention. Z>> So why is TB! using it? > Dunno. Z>> TB! is not know for its adherence to MS "standards" and were can I change this Z>>

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

ON Thursday, October 28, 2004, 2:42:22 PM, you wrote: RO> Couldn't find a way in TB. Only thing I can think of is exporting to RO> .msg and then attaching it. Roelof, I did see that possibility to. I am wondering why they block EML and not MSG attachements when they are basicly the same file for

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Hallo Gerard, On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:36:21 +0200GMT (28-10-2004, 13:36 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JS>> Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's JS>> invention. Z> So why is TB! using it? Dunno. Z> TB! is not know for its adherence to MS "standards" and w

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Hello Gerard! On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 7:32 AM, you wrote: MB>> Main Window of TB!, Options/Preferences/Protection. G> Thanks for the reply but I was looking to change the EML extension G> generated by TB! when you do an alternative forward with an HTML G> msg. Ah. I'd been reading the th

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

ON Thursday, October 28, 2004, 2:04:34 PM, you wrote: MB> Main Window of TB!, Options/Preferences/Protection. Hi Mary, Thanks for the reply but I was looking to change the EML extension generated by TB! when you do an alternative forward with an HTML msg. I hope this make sense ;-) -- Best re

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Hello Gerard! On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 6:36 AM, you wrote, in part: G> were can I change this in TB! from EML to MSG? Main Window of TB!, Options/Preferences/Protection. I am so skittish of messing with TB!'s default here, however, that before I made a change I did a C&P to SmartBat, so t

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

ON Thursday, October 28, 2004, 9:15:36 AM, you wrote: JS> Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's JS> invention. Hi Jernej, So why is TB! using it? TB! is not know for its adherence to MS "standards" and were can I change this in TB! from EML to MSG? -- Best

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 8:57:24, Gerard wrote: > So is there an EML equivalent extension not on the ban list that you know of? Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's invention. -- < Jernej Simoncic ><><><><>< http://deepthought.ena.si/ > Anticipated

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

ON Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 1:17:33 PM, you wrote: RO> Specials -> Alternative forward RO> or Hi Roelof, Look what a customer of mine received in their mail when I attached the EML extension: This text was added by an EDS mail relay -

Re: [the_bat] Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

ON Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 6:05:42 PM, you wrote: ASK> If I forward an HTML message, the forward message should open as HTML and ASK> the unaltered original message should be part of any forward/redirect. Hi Alexander, My feeling exactly. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [the_bat] Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Hello Michael Acklin & everyone else 27-Okt-2004 16:21, you wrote: > I have no way of checking the actual message for sure, but I believe > the second method, as Roelof mentioned, with the box checked will show > the message in HTML to the person you are sending it to. I have tried that meanwhil

Re: [the_bat] Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 7:02:48 AM, (Internet Time - @543) you wrote: Hello Alexander, ASK> When I use alternative forward, I end up with an empty reply template ASK> and a "1.eml" attachment with the original HTML message just as you ASK> said but em... ASK> Well, forwarding messages

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Hello Roelof, Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 1:17:33 PM, you wrote: Z>> Isn't alternative forward the same a redirect? > No. You can forward a message in two ways, with the original message > in the body of your message or with the original message as an > attachment. What is normal and what is al

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:02:55 +0200, "Alexander S. Kunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I want to forward/redirect HTML and preserve the original message - >IMHO this is a must-have function, is this on the wishlist already? A whole lot of flaws regarding HTML formatting should be solved ages ago, bu

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Hallo Gerard, On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:03:24 +0200GMT (27-10-2004, 13:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO>> Use alternative forward, that way the original message is sent as it RO>> is, as an attachment. Z> lIsn't alternative forward the same a redirect? No. You can forward a message in two way

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

ON Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 11:54:37 AM, you wrote: RO> Use alternative forward, that way the original message is sent as it RO> is, as an attachment. Hi Roelof, lIsn't alternative forward the same a redirect? If not how do you do this alernative forward? -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Hello Gerard, Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 11:40:40 AM, you wrote: > Can I please get some help on forwarding a HTML mail. [...] Funny - I've had the same problem just yesterday... > Does anyone have a solution for this? I haven't, sorry. Whats worse - same happens wh

Re: Forwarding a HTML mail

Hallo Gerard, On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:40:40 +0200GMT (27-10-2004, 11:40 +0200, where I live), you wrote: Z> Can I please get some help on forwarding a HTML mail. Z> The problem seems to be with embedded pictures. All the Z> receiving party sees when they select the HTML part is the t

Forwarding a HTML mail

Hi Bat Users, Can I please get some help on forwarding a HTML mail. The problem seems to be with embedded pictures. All the receiving party sees when they select the HTML part is the text and the little redboxes were the pictures should go and a list of JPG's on the side. I have

Re[2]: OT: reply to html mail with Outlook without image download (was: Re: New Competition for The Bat!)

Hi Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 8:01:40 PM, Bryan Anderson wrote: > even when the account was set to ALWAYS send in plain text, > it still tries to download the images when you reply. I asked on > support newsgroups and no-one has an answer for it.oh, it's > the way that it works...it's

Re: What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail.

On Tuesday, September 21, 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated: M> Consequences would be a larger message, in HTML, and more than doubly M> larger with Html/Plain text editing. Kinda backwards there .. plaintext may increase the size by .2% vice 200% A pure plaintext message may be 1K The identical mes

Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail.)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo WilWilWil, On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:35:32 +0200GMT (22-9-2004, 0:35 +0200, where I live), you wrote: W> ===End of original message text=== Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person b

Re[2]: What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail.

==Original message text=== From: Ludovic LE MOAL To: WilWilWil Date: Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 6:23:35 PM Subject: What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail. LLM> Hi, LLM> On Tuesday, September 21, 2004 at 12:12:26 PM, WilWilWil wrote: &

Re: What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail.

Hi, On Tuesday, September 21, 2004 at 12:12:26 PM, WilWilWil wrote: > What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail. > What are consequences for my editing, and for the person it is addressed to ? Pure HTML mail are often considered as Spam and Html/Plain off

Re: What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail.

***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 21 Sep 2004, @ @ at 12:12:26 +0200, when WilWilWil wrote: > What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail. > What are consequences for my editing, and for the person it is addressed

What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail.

What is the difference between HTML mail and Html/Plain text mail. What are consequences for my editing, and for the person it is addressed to ? -- WilWilWil (France) TB 3.0 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using

redirecting html mail to gmail

In TB, I've noticed that I receive two types of HTML mail: both show the full message as message.html attachment, but they differ in one type being able to the delete the attachment. I can't delete the html attachment with Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--(s

Re: OT: reply to html mail with Outlook without image download (was: Re: New Competition for The Bat!)

> I convert all emails to plain text and that would not probably > not cause the need to download the images. > You're correct about the stupid "ok/cancel" choice, but you > could convert the email to plain text before replying - I believe. Not that I could see anywhereeven when the account w

OT: reply to html mail with Outlook without image download (was: Re: New Competition for The Bat!)

Hello TBUDL, on Tue, 14. Sep 2004 at 15:06:02 +0100 Bryan Anderson wrote: > Then I want to replya window pops up saying that I have to > connect to the server and download the imagespress OK or Cancel. > No option to reply WITHOUT including the images or reply and not > download them at a

Re[3]: composing html mail

jwayne, Saturday, July 10, 2004, 9:24:42 PM, you wrote: j> Ya, know, I used to be a die-hard text-only email user and composer. But after j> delving more into usability studies, the importance of font and layout control j> in _email_ became very apparent. My experience also. j> (And the p

Re[2]: composing html mail

On Saturday, July 10, 2004, 12:10:05 AM, Russell L. Farabee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RLF> jwayne, RLF> Friday, July 9, 2004, 6:25:25 PM, you wrote: == RLF> It's a mess. I have a work around that involves inserting the html code via search and replace, but it is cum

Re: composing html mail

jwayne, Friday, July 9, 2004, 6:25:25 PM, you wrote: j> If I compose within TB using HTML/Plain Text and then switch to HTML only, HTML j> formatting is lost. I can't cut/paste from one HTML message into another. If I j> import text with HTML into the plain text editor and switch to HTML/Plain T

composing html mail

Having various problems with html mail. If I compose within TB using HTML/Plain Text and then switch to HTML only, HTML formatting is lost. I can't cut/paste from one HTML message into another. If I import text with HTML into the plain text editor and switch to HTML/Plain Text, almost all

Re: HTML mail forward & reply

Hello jwayne, On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:29:54 -0400 GMT (11/06/2004, 02:29 +0700 GMT), jwayne wrote: j> If I forward HTML mail or reply to it, how do I get the j> original message body to stay in HTML format? As is, it gets j> converted to plain text. You don't say which TB version

HTML mail forward & reply

If I forward HTML mail or reply to it, how do I get the original message body to stay in HTML format? As is, it gets converted to plain text. Thanks - jon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' informa

HTML mail problems & a question

I'm putting together some email newsletters in HTML format. (Please, no rants against HTML email. For some purposes it is far superior than plain text for readability.) But what's the deal with TB's HTML editor? Almost NOTHING works from the menu. Search (find, replace) does NOTHING. Utilities i

Displaying HTML mail (to what version and does it include css)?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, What versions of HTML will be displayed correctly when receiving an html mail? Looking at some mails it does not support css. Is that correct? - -- Cheers, Edgar Communicating with TB! v2.02 CE, Windows 2000 5.0.2195 - From the point

Re[2]: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hi, Leif Gregory wrote: > Please trim replies to context. Oops, sorry, accidentally forgot to trim it this time... Antje Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A -- | Antje Lehmann | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hello Roelof, Wednesday, September 17, 2003, 1:59:31 PM, you wrote: RO> Who's Christian and why should he feel singled out? ;-) I was dinking with the template earlier yesterday and I had cut and pasted from one I'd moderated. Forgot to fix it. Thanks for catching it. :-) -- Leif (TB list mo

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hallo Leif, On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:16:53 -0600GMT (17-9-03, 21:16 +0200, where I live), you wrote: LG> Hello Antje, LG> this reply. Please don't feel singled out Christian. Who's Christian and why should he feel singled out? ;-) You're using TB and that's a great program to 'personalise' messag

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hello Antje, Wednesday, September 17, 2003, 11:57:24 AM, you wrote: AL> I understand now that there are different opinions on this issue, AL> and that's what I wanted to know when I asked what you thought AL> about it. This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the p

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hello Antje, > I know, I know... but I'm a lazy person, you know ;-))) We all are ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.00.6 Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.co

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hello Roelof, > BTW Please don't suggest that TB should be able to access pics > anywhere on the internet. Not even as a configurable option. Something > like that is no function of an e-mail client. Fully agree. Many people around the world still use dial-up connections, the connect, download e-

Re[2]: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hi Roelof, > First of all, I didn't test this. ;-) > Create an incoming filter for your Daily Dilbert Mail that extracts > the attached file to disk and let the same filter start an external > program, in this case your browser with a parameter that makes it open > your attachment. > Since 'extrac

Re[2]: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hi, Roelof Otten wrote: > Hallo Joseph, > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:40:59 -0500GMT (17-9-03, 17:40 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: JN>> I didn't test your idea either, but it seems like a brilliant JN>> approach. > I think that's a bit too much, but thanks anyhow. ;-) JN>> If it were packaged

Re[2]: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hi Miguel, > As I say, maybe I didn't understand a word of what this thread is all > about. But if I did... My goodness! All is needed is a double click! I know, I know... but I'm a lazy person, you know ;-))) And I simply thought there might be a way for me to not have to open the browser every

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hello Roelof, On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 18:21:33 +0200 GMT (17/09/2003, 23:21 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: JN>> and also requiring some user confirmation to avoid automated JN>> problems, it would be a good feature addition to TB! > As another feature it would be bloatware. As far as the user > con

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hello Joseph, > If it were packaged in a way to be easily triggered by the user, and > also requiring some user confirmation to avoid automated problems, it > would be a good feature addition to TB! I may have not understood what this whole thread is about but, what is wrong with double clicking

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hallo Joseph, On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:40:59 -0500GMT (17-9-03, 17:40 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JN> I didn't test your idea either, but it seems like a brilliant JN> approach. I think that's a bit too much, but thanks anyhow. ;-) JN> If it were packaged in a way to be easily triggered by t

Re[2]: HTML Mail selective image display?

On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, Roelof Otten wrote in : RO> First of all, I didn't test this. ;-) Create an incoming filter RO> for your Daily Dilbert Mail that extracts the attached file to RO> disk and let the same filter start an external program, in this RO> case yo

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hallo Antje, On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:39:39 +0200GMT (17-9-03, 12:39 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AL> Is there any chance that one has the possibility to select certain AL> originating addresses one can trust so that TB! shows these images AL> right away in the HTML viewer? First of all, I did

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, Antje Lehmann wrote in : AL> Is there any chance that one has the possibility to select AL> certain originating addresses one can trust so that TB! shows AL> these images right away in the HTML viewer? Antje, I think your idea is a goo

Re: HTML Mail selective image display?

Hello Antje On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, you wrote > Is there any chance that > one has the possibility to select certain originating addresses one > can trust so that TB! shows these images right away in the HTML > viewer? If not, that would be a feature I'd wish for... what do you > think?

HTML Mail selective image display?

Hi all, like most of you I normally don't like getting dubious HTML mails and am therefore happy that TB! doesn't display images that are not embedded in the message but linked to some external servers. Obviously that's very useful when spammers send images of lonely housewives or whatever ;-)) Bu

Re: HTML mail

Tuesday, 12/3/2002, 2:44 PM Hi Simon, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, at 13:59:47 [GMT +] (which was 5:59 AM where I live) you wrote about: 'HTML mail' S> Although I have absolutely no wish to use an HTML feature should it be S> introduced, the addition of such a feature as

Re: HTML mail

On Tuesday, December 03, 2002 Kevin stated: K> I'd like to know what other mailer those who say they would dump TB! K> if it became capable of creating HTML mail would go to since many K> other mailers already have this function. Easy .. keep the last non-html creating version of

Re: HTML mail

Hello Spike, On Tuesday, 3. December 2002 at 14:11:00 [GMT -0500] you wrote: MD>> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD>> in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background MD>> images...background sounds I know might be too muc

Re: HTML mail

Hello Mean Drake, On or about Monday, December 02, 2002 at 02:46:32GMT +0530 (which was 4:16 PM in the tropics where I live) Mean Drake scribbled; MD> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD> in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background MD&g

Re[2]: HTML mail

Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 2:55:07 PM, you wrote: > I am very glad you didn't write this one here: > http://ccug.apcug.org/newsApr02.htm ;-) :-) ... yeah... Imagine the flames it would set up here...rushing for fireproof clothing. > Please continue to ask. I encourage you to write one on The B

Re[2]: HTML mail

who say they would dump TB! if it became capable of creating HTML mail would go to since many other mailers already have this function. -- Kevin __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Ema

Re: HTML mail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 'Lo Don, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 09:27:42 -0500 your time, you said: DZ> The only time I find html mail useful is on certain newsletters I DZ> receive. I can't even abide html newsletters Don! Sign up for a text based email, and

Re: HTML mail

a good thing, surely? And I am sure that any > _remaining_ 'die hard' core users would soon be able to whop the > *text-based email illiterati* into shape - well from my experiences of > this list I am in no doubt of that ;-) The only time I find html mail useful is on cer

Re: HTML mail

B! are carried over to the elusive v2, and other often requested features are to be added to v2 as well, it would be completely foolish IMO to even begin to consider dumping TB! simply because of the inclusion of an option that you don't wish to make use of yourself. Let's face it, peop

Re: HTML mail

Hello Mean, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:11:56 +0530 GMT (03/12/02, 12:41 +0700 GMT), Mean Drake wrote: >> Are your software reviews on the internet, so we can read a bit? > Thanks to all of those who replied. Indeed amny of the reviews are > online. I am webmaster and Editor for the Colony Computer Us

Re: HTML mail

Hello Mean, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 at 11:11:56[GMT +0530](which was 05:41 where I live) you wrote: MD> http://ccug.apcug.org the newsletter section has all my reviews. MD> Planning to write one on the Bat! I am a recent user still getting my MD> feet wet...that's why the elementary question. Do you

Re[2]: HTML mail

Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 5:53:41 AM, you wrote: > Hello Mean, > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 04:04:47 +0530 GMT (03/12/02, 05:34 +0700 GMT), > Mean Drake wrote: MD>>>> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD>>>> in Outlooklike have

Re: HTML mail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, December 02, 2002 Marck D Pearlstone stated: MDP> Version 2, currently under development is scheduled to include HTML MDP> composition. Many die-hard users are still disgusted with this and MDP> are threatening jumping ship should it indeed

Re: HTML mail

Hello Mean, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 04:04:47 +0530 GMT (03/12/02, 05:34 +0700 GMT), Mean Drake wrote: MD>>> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD>>> in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background MD>>> images...background sounds

Re: HTML mail

it all. MD> Need to kow things I can put in my review. Did I step in MD> something mucky here? http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml It is possible to send "HTML mail" with the current version of TB and the method is explained in the FAQ. This version of

Re: HTML mail

Ciao Mean, in data lunedì 2 dicembre 2002, alle 22:16, hai scritto: MD> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD> in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background MD> images...background sounds I know might be too much to ask :-) thanks to God,

Re: HTML mail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Monday, December 02, 2002 6:07:23 PM RE: "HTML mail" Greetings Mean, On Monday, December 2, 2002, 4:16:32 PM, you wrote: MD> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD> in Outlooklike have in

Re: HTML mail

Hi TBUDL, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, at 04:04:47 [GMT +0530] you wrote: MD> Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 3:54:30 AM, you wrote: >> Hi TBUDL, >> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, at 02:46:32 [GMT +0530] you wrote: MD>>> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do

Re: HTML mail

Hello Mean, On Tuesday, 3. December 2002 at 02:46:32 [GMT +0530] you wrote: > Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do > in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background > images...background sounds I know might be too much to ask :-) here we

Re[2]: HTML mail

Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 3:54:30 AM, you wrote: > Hi TBUDL, > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, at 02:46:32 [GMT +0530] you wrote: MD>> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD>> in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background MD>> images...

Re: HTML mail

Good evening Mean, It was foretold that on 2-12-2002 @ 02:46:32 GMT+0530 (which was 22:16:32 where I live) Mean Drake would mumble: MD> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail No. -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The

Re: HTML mail

Hi TBUDL, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, at 02:46:32 [GMT +0530] you wrote: MD> Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD> in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background MD> images...background sounds I know might be too much to ask :-) Ooooh here we go agai

HTML mail

Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background images...background sounds I know might be too much to ask :-) Best regards, Mean mailto:mean at activewin.com

Re: Crashes through HTML mail?

On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 11:22:35 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote: > One of the newsletters I receive is the New York Times one. At > first I signed up to receive the HTML format which most of the > times seemed to work. I get Today's Headlines, Movie Update, Circuits, and Election Countdown.

Re: Crashes through HTML mail?

Hello Markus! On Wednesday, October 9, 2002 at 7:11:50 PM you wrote: > Try to keep track of GDI resources. The HTML parser might use them all > up. I don't know what tools are out there to check GDI usage on Win98, > though. Thanks, the part about GDI I knew. what I try to find out is, what exa

Re: Crashes through HTML mail?

Hi, Dierk Haasis wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : > Anybody else encountering such behaviour. Try to keep track of GDI resources. The HTML parser might use them all up. I don't know what tools are out there to check GDI usage on Win98, though. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.62/Beta5 u

Crashes through HTML mail?

Hello TBUDL Members! One of the newsletters I receive is the New York Times one. At first I signed up to receive the HTML format which most of the times seemed to work. Nonetheless sometimes when I try to scroll the NYT newsletter it invariably brings down the system. I get an error me

Re: I hate HTML mail

Hi Allie, on Wed, 17 Jul 2002 17:58:29 -0500GMT (18.07.02, 00:58 +0200GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : ACM> Take any further discussion on this thread off-list. ACM> Thanks! I'm sorry for this mail to appear in this thread which should be considered a dead hor

Re: I hate HTML mail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Meyns [PM] wrote: PM> Any follow-up on other mothers' PCs should occur on TBOT, I think. PM> It might be an interesting topic... ;o) Yes, please!! Take any further discussion on this th

Re: I hate HTML mail

Hi Richard, on Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:27:03 +0100GMT (16.07.02, 19:27 +0200GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : RE> I am trying to convince my Mother to switch from "lookout" to the bat RE> whilst she is quite impressed with the ease of use and functionality RE> she

DEAD HORSE (was [OT] I hate HTML mail)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dierk, @17 July 2002, 18:10 +0200 (17:10 UK time) Dierk Haasis [DH] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Ben Kennish: >> NOOO! Why do you use Opera? It isn't properly CSS or HTML compliant! DH> Actually it is 100% HTML 4 complia

Re: [OT] I hate HTML mail

Hello Ben! On Wednesday, July 17, 2002 at 1:35:03 AM you wrote: > NOOO! Why do you use Opera? It isn't properly CSS or HTML compliant! Actually it is 100% HTML 4 compliant. And CSS. It only lacks in DOM. > Please please please use a browser based on the Gecko engine Please, please use a car

Re[3]: [OT] I hate HTML mail

Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 4:35:03 PM, you wrote: [snip] BK> NOOO! Why do you use Opera? It isn't properly CSS or HTML compliant! BK> Please please please use a browser based on the Gecko engine (like BK> Mozilla or K-Meleon) to give web site designers (such as me) an actual BK> standard that we

Re[2]: I hate HTML mail

o some html messages are totally unreadable because of this issue too. even the plain text doesn't show what is missing in the html view.. almost all of my html mail have x's where the pictures are. -- Best regards, alistsmailto:

Re[2]: I hate HTML mail

Hello Markus, Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 10:16:34 AM, you wrote : MG> This doesn't always work. I think it depends on the attachment storage MG> option and on the Content Disposition MIME tag. I know that there are MG> HTML messages that display fine (with images) within the bat but the MG> imag

Re: I hate HTML mail

Hi, Thomas F wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : > Why not? When I receive HTML mails with embedded objects, they display > fine. Just click on the tab below the message. > A work-around is to click on the HTML attachment. The whole HTML > message will then display in the system-default browser.

Re[2]: [OT] I hate HTML mail

Hi Sudip, On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 2:24:19 AM, you [SP] wrote: SP> Hi Ben, SP> On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:35:03 +0100 GMT (Jul 17, 05:20 my local time), SP> you [BK] wrote: BK>> Mozilla 1.0 supports tabs just like Opera, comes without any BK>> adverts and supports resumeable downloads. SP> I'

Re: [OT] I hate HTML mail

Hello Ben, On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:35:03 +0100 GMT (17/07/02, 06:35 +0700 GMT), Ben Kennish wrote: BK> Please please please use a browser based on the Gecko engine (like BK> Mozilla or K-Meleon) to give web site designers (such as me) an actual BK> standard that we can work to without fear of bro

<    1   2   3   4   >