Simon Laws wrote:
I want to persist/read the domain model to/from disc. At the moment it's
held in memory and there's no way of reading it in or writing it out other
than via the domain API. The model itself is very limited and overlaps the
assembly model so I'm stripping out any repeated info so
wang feng wrote:
> Hi,all
> I has a scenario as below.
> When get a service,I want to use a common service class such as
> 'ServiceInvoker'.
> The use of the common class like a class reflect.
>
> ServiceInvoker.java
> public interface ServiceInvoker{
> Object invoke(String met
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I tried the plugins and it works well.
I also made the following improvements:
1) Integrate the plugin with maven scm capability, i.e. use APIs to call
"svn status" to detect if there are any local changes against SVN repo.
(Pretty fast for a single module).
Any ide
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
2007/12/5, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Some answers after researching the spec docs:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I think this issue needs to be brought up at the spec level.
Basically, the following have to be clarifi
Simon Laws wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007 5:06 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We have been painful with running the web application tests manually a few
days before a release. I think it would be beneficial to automate the
tests
as part of the maven build. To get it started, I checked
Simon Nash wrote:
This approach sounds good to me. I'd like to suggest one small
addition to the final "else" clause, based on the following spec quote:
Java SCA Annotations and APIs spec: 1531
Complex data types exchanged via remotable service interfaces must be
compatible with the marshall
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I have checked in the first cut under
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601501&view=rev. With these changes, we
now use JAXB databinding to deal with POJOs (including simple and
complex types). By the JAXB Java to XML default mapping, POJOs are
supported in line with t
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Let's take the transaction policy as an example to understand the
responsibilities of the players.
Assuming the following intents are declared against the binding or
implementation types, what code are needed to enforce the semantics?
Intent
I'm sharing this as I think it could be useful to others.
I like to build the java/sca tree before committing code changes to
check that my changes are not going to break any other module.
This gives me a peace of mind as I don't have to worry about build
breaks and is also nice to other cont
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Some answers after researching the spec docs:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I think this issue needs to be brought up at the spec level.
Basically, the following have to be clarified:
1) What interfaces are qualified to be remotable?
2) What are the characteristics
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
To get me going on this I've experimented with moving the FruitsCatalog out
of the cloud and into a webapp. The web app relies on the evolving deep
tomcat integration so starting the scenario requires the following steps
Unzip the distribution/tomcat zip over your
Some answers after researching the spec docs:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I think this issue needs to be brought up at the spec level. Basically,
the following have to be clarified:
1) What interfaces are qualified to be remotable?
2) What are the characteristics of the input/output types for re
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
2007/11/29, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
2007/11/28, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
One of the first problem that i had, when I started using Tuscany, was that
I was serialize something witho
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 5:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 1:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have discussed this behaviour before and I was sort of convinced
last
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 5:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 1:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have discussed this behaviour before and I was sort of convinced
last
time but now I'm playi
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
Heres what I am intending to do for the secure-bigbank into which I have
copied over the exiting calculator, stockquote and account demos into
secure-bigbank...
Could you commit that? it doesn't have to work, I'm sure it's going to
take a few weeks before it does,
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I suggest that we not expand too quickly into other bindings such as
RMI. Let's focus on getting your previous proposal (StockQuote,
AccountData services) implemented first.
Thanks,
Raymond
+1 to try to work through the actual scenario first.
When I brought up the
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 4:44 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 4:38 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 2:46 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 2:09 PM, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 1:52
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 1:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have discussed this behaviour before and I was sort of convinced last
time but now I'm playing with the store sample I'm not so sure. This
features comes about because of the store composite, for example,
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I've been using the calculator sample for demonstrating implementation
polices until begining of this week when I realized that I was cluttering
that sample a bit. So I decided to leave that alone and create a new sample
for demonstrating implementation policies (cal
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
The Assembly and Policy Fwk specs mention that domain-wide definitions such
as policy intents, policysets, binding type defns, impl type defns all
defined in a 'global, domain-wide file' named. definitions.xml
A single domain wide file with all definitions may not pl
Simon Nash wrote:
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
I have some suggestions here:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I prefer to have consistent rules (with respect to what the business
objects can look like or must implement) between a remotable
interface bound to an XML-based binding and a
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I propose to add the following to the BigBank scenario too to cover
transaction policies and JMS binding.
1) Have separate components to represent the SavingsAccountService and
CheckingAccountService. The two services will be backed by two different
resource managers
Simon Laws wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 4:11 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
If I understand this correctly it looks like a reasonable way to extend
the
Fruit&Veg scenario. In the current scenario I believe that the catalog
services, whe
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
One of the first problem that i had, when I started using Tuscany, was that
I was serialize something without a mapping, because I wanted that a
job was something
more generics possible, i couldn't.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "serialize something without
a
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
If I understand this correctly it looks like a reasonable way to extend the
Fruit&Veg scenario. In the current scenario I believe that the catalog
services, when run from the "cloud" module are running as part of the
distributed domain but rely on the embedded Jetty supp
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
I think there are two options:
1) Make the JAXB databinding as the default databinding for POJOs
(simple and complex types).
What about doing that? any drawback?
And, jumping ahead
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
The online store tutorial application is now pretty much working.
[snip]
the tutorial does not yet show how to distribute
the application across different containers like Tomcat or Geronimo. I
think we should add that aspect too, I'll post some ide
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
I would like to make a start on improving the modularity of the
distro by building a distro containing only a base SCA runtime.
Sebastien's description of this was
- base SCA runtime (assembly, policy fwk, impl-java)
[snip]
I ha
The online store tutorial application is now pretty much working.
It shows how SCA allows a business to create an online store composite
application and recompose and evolve it as the business changes and expands.
1. How to build an online store to sell fruits online with an SCA
composite, a
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
I think there are two options:
1) Make the JAXB databinding as the default databinding for POJOs
(simple and complex types).
What about doing that? any drawback?
And, jumping ahead and assuming that any drawbacks are acceptable, what
aymond
- Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: Data transformation from/to POJO
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just did a test to see how JAXB-RI handles the POJO without any
annotat
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
I'll propose a scenario in a separate email.
Here it goes:
- We have support for SCA security policies.
- We have a Bigbank application.
- A bank application should be secure.
Looks like a perfect fit to me.
Going through a real world like scenari
Raymond Feng wrote:
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Venkata Krishnan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 2:51 AM
Subject: Policy Framework Scenarios.
Hi,
Most part of the core policy framework now implemented except
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Meanwhile, I'd like to whet and evolve whatever has been done with different
user perspectives... so here are some perspectives I could think of... could
people kindly help with their opinions and inputs on this, please also
if any of you have other scenarios or ways
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
Should autowiring work at the domain level? It doesn't at the moment.
It's
only considered within a contributed composite. To autowire at the domain
level we have to adjust the way that service endpoints and references are
matched, i.e. extend the process to looking
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Sebastien,
We would like to enable a binary Tuscany distribution to run under OSGi. I
am not sure of the level of granularity at which a bundle-ized Tuscany makes
sense in terms of providing modularity and versioning using OSGi. But I
would like to make sure that the bundl
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just did a test to see how JAXB-RI handles the POJO without any
annotations. The result seems to be promising.
I started with a POJO:
public class MyBean {
private int age;
private String name;
private List notes = new ArrayList();
public int getAge() {
Simon Nash wrote:
The following method names in domain-api and node-api include a
reference to either a domain or a node:
SCADomain.addToDomainLevelComposite()
SCADomain.removeFromDomainLevelComposite()
SCADomain.getDomainLevelComposite()
SCADomainFactory.createSCADomain()
SCADomainFinder.ge
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I'm on the same boat as Mike and you. The discussion was about how can
we simplify the data transformation of a subset of POJOs following a
strict pattern without starting from a formal model such as XSD. I don't
know any JAXB implementation can handle a POJO without J
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Simon,
I did take a look at splitting the Tuscany distribution into bundles with
the hope of defining something which makes sense for OSGi as well as
non-OSGi. I dont really think that makes much sense anymore. Grouping
modules into OSGi bundles using existing maven plugins
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
I would like to make a start on improving the modularity of the
distro by building a distro containing only a base SCA runtime.
Sebastien's description of this was
- base SCA runtime (assembly, policy fwk, impl-java)
[snip]
I haven't yet figured out how to do a sandbo
Simon Laws wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007 3:59 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Are you sure that this is the right semantics? Can you help me
understand why we need to change the naming of the service if there's a
a callback?
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Au
Are you sure that this is the right semantics? Can you help me
understand why we need to change the naming of the service if there's a
a callback?
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: slaws
Date: Tue Nov 20 06:35:45 2007
New Revision: 596692
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596692&
shaoguang geng wrote:
Hi, Lucaino:
I tried more, and I noticed that to make JSONObject->pojo work, I need to
annote the service interface as @Remoteable.
The actual transform happens as:
JSONObject->JSON2XMLStreamReader->XMLStreamReader->XML2JavaBeanTransformer->pojo
So inside this chain, I
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
Samples are very important for beginning users. For users who have
moved beyond that stage and are doing real development using Tuscany,
samples are not very important. If people in this category do want
samples, they are likely to just want to refer to samples source c
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
The javadoc in QName.valueOf(String) method has some explanations:
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/api/javax/xml/namespace/QName.html#valueOf(java.lang.String)
Thanks,
Raymond
OK Thanks, what about the other questions?
Also, I'm not sure I understand the code
ant elder wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Rajini Sivaram to become a
Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Rajini!
...ant
Welcome Rajini!
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
kelvin goodson wrote:
I missed you last point in my reply. getStaticType() is required to
underpin fundamental EMF behaviour. Without it EMF's capacity to know
the class of an EObject (which all our DataObjects are derived from)
is broken for all static classes, and that would break many SDO
b
kelvin goodson wrote:
Sebastien,
There's the basis of a Java interface to SDO generator at [1] but it
hasn't been developed to a working state and hasn't been looked since
the initial drop of code into Tuscany. It would be great to get this
or similar function up and running.
If you take a loo
Simon Laws wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007 6:21 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Should the domain api allow users to create service references to
services
that don't exist in the domain yet. Currently they can and they get an
exception if they try
Raymond Feng wrote:
Please see comments inline.
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: Data transformation from/to POJO
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
With the recent de
Raymond Feng wrote:
Please see comments inline.
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: Data transformation from/to POJO
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
With the recent de
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
By the Namespaces in XML 1.0 (second edition) [1]:
[Definition: An XML namespace is identified by a URI reference
[RFC3986]; element and attribute names may be placed in an XML
namespace using the mechanisms described in this specification. ]
By RFC3986 [2]:
URI
Simon Laws wrote:
Should the domain api allow users to create service references to services
that don't exist in the domain yet. Currently they can and they get an
exception if they try and use it. This is consistent with the way that
references are injected into components work. I'm comfortable
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 9:11 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Try removing the test scope from derby dependency on the
implementation-data pom.
Did that and it
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
With the recent development of the online store tutorial, we encounter
quite a few issues around the transformation between POJO and other
databindings (such as XML, JSON).
Yeah :)
Let's take the POJO <--> XML as an example. Here is a set of questions
to be answer
Simon Laws wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 5:59 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: jsdelfino
Date: Wed Nov 14 21:59:04 2007
New Revision: 595217
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595217&view=rev
Log:
Configure the default HTTP port from service uris declared in the
composite running on a nod
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
The spec case is slightly different as the syntax is
namespace#wsdl.xxx(...). We know the # before wsdl.xxx(...) is the
delimiter.
[snip]
2) # is valid character for namespace, using # as the delimiter
could lead
to conflict.
[snip]
Isn't there a problem then wi
kelvin goodson wrote:
If you are discounting using XSD for the source of metadata to
describe the SDO types then there is the SDO API provided for dynamic
metadata creation. The sample at [1] gives an introduction to this.
The paper at [2] discusses the subject also, and the program
underlying t
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 3:30 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
If
implementation-data needs derby to be used then whats wrong with
defining
that as a dependency?
implementation-data doesn't require derby, you should be
Antollini, Mario wrote:
Jean-Sebastien,
I added the amazon cart to jire:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12369533/tutorial-amazo
n.zip
Sadly, I could not get the test running, therefore I am not sure it will
run properly.
I committed your new module with the follow
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 9:11 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Try removing the test scope from derby dependency on the
implementation-data pom.
Did that and it works around the problem, but it's a workaround :)
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Are you referring to the binary distro?
Yes
AFAIK, the binary distro only contains artifacts under modules and
their compile/runtime dependencies.
Correct
I think it should be individiual sample's reponsiblity to declare
extra dependencies.
Yes, makes sense.
Luciano Resende wrote:
Try removing the test scope from derby dependency on the
implementation-data pom.
Did that and it works around the problem, but it's a workaround :)
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
Dependencies from our samples do not seem to be pulled in the distro,
unless a module under modules/ also has a runtime or compile dependency
on them.
For example if you build a distro containing the implementation-data
module (but not containing implementation-bpel which has a compile
depend
Antollini, Mario wrote:
Jean-Sebastien,
I added the amazon cart to jire:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12369533/tutorial-amazo
n.zip
Sadly, I could not get the test running, therefore I am not sure it will
run properly.
Mario,
Mario E. Antollini
Intel Softwa
The online store tutorial currently uses a simple handwritten JavaBean
to represent the Items in the store catalog and shopping cart. I'm able
to flow that Item bean over local calls, WS, Atom and JSON bindings.
Here's what it looks like:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/
[snip]
Luciano Resende wrote:
I can handle moving the BPEL unit tests to iTest as I'm currently
working on the BPEL implementation.
As for the build order issue, I guess we can fix that by adding
wsdl2java as a dependency to the project or to the plugin. This should
make wsdl2java build first
Luciano Resende wrote:
How are you going to invoke the WSDL2Java class during the "generate"
phase of the maven build, in order have the necessary java artifacts
for compile ?
Like that (untested):
org.codehaus.mojo
exec-maven-plugin
generate-test-source
generate
:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.javabeans.JavaBean2XMLStreamReader;source=java:complexType,target=javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamReader,weight=79000
Build the databinding module. You should get the exception at the bottom
of that email.
Thanks.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien De
Modules/implementation-bpel currently uses the Tuscany maven-wsdl2java
Maven plugin to generate Java interfaces for its unit test cases.
It's the only module that does that. I'd like to switch it to use the
WSDL2Java class directly as Maven does not seem to want to build that
plugin before ru
Simon Laws wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007 4:04 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Now that 1.0.1 is well on the way I'd like to suggest that we start to
think about our next feature release (1.1).
+1
We need to decide w
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Now that 1.0.1 is well on the way I'd like to suggest that we start to
think about our next feature release (1.1).
+1
We need to decide what we want in and when we want to get the release out.
Aside from the roadmap page, is there already a list with what peop
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Thanks for the comments. I think we are pretty close on the sequence. It may
be that we differ on how this is plumbed into the infrastructure.
OK I'll take a look at the code if it's already in SVN.
For steps
3 and 4 I'm dealing with all of the services, references in
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'm trying to add some support for business objects to the Tutorial
(instead of just flowing the catalog and cart items as strings).
My business objects are simple JavaBeans with an
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'm trying to add some support for business objects to the Tutorial
(instead of just flowing the catalog and cart items as strings).
My business objects are simple JavaBeans with an empty constructor. I
need to flow them as
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'm trying to add some support for business objects to the Tutorial
(instead of just flowing the catalog and cart items as strings).
My business objects are simple JavaBeans with an empty constructor. I
need to flow them as Java objects through local se
Simon Laws wrote:
I've started putting some code in the node implementation to allow remote
bindings to make use of reference targets for identifying service endpoints.
It's very simple at the moment. The node implementation uses the
startComposite event as a trigger to
1/ scan all services in
Luciano Resende wrote:
While working with the BPEL component type implementation, I came
across some WSDL files that define PortTypes, but no services. These
files, when processed by Wsdl2Java tool, fails to generate any java
artifacts as it looks like the code we have today only process
services
Still trying to make the Tutorial use simple business objects instead of
Strings... I need to add minimum support for generics to the Java
interface introspector.
This will allow it to correctly introspect the Cart interface, defined
as follows:
@Remotable
public interface Cart extends Colle
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
The PolicyFwk specs has the following : -
984
985
987 …
988 *
991 …
992
993 …
994
The xsd for 'implementation' (sca:Implementation) in the Assembly Model
specs does not seem to have the element 'operation' defined as child
element. Is this so
I'm trying to add some support for business objects to the Tutorial
(instead of just flowing the catalog and cart items as strings).
My business objects are simple JavaBeans with an empty constructor. I
need to flow them as Java objects through local service calls, XML (in
Atom payloads) and J
Anyone going to ApacheCon?
I'm there at the Hackathon today and will be there all week.
Drop me an email if you're going to be there and want to meet!
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addition
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of
Tuscany SCA for Java.
The RC5 contains a few fixes to issues discovered in RC4. Thank you
for reporting and fixing the issues promptly.
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tag
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
I just went through the samples that I had problems with before and they
look good now. The only issue I have is that helloworld-ws-reference-jms is
still in there but that's not a blocker as we can ask people to ignore it.
I missed this one, +1 to remove it if we'r
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I have to fix a few classes to get the working (with
some limitations) for remote URLs. I'm not sure if we should rush this
into 1.0.1.
Should we just remove the WSDL and document how to get it from the
internet?
Thanks,
Raymond
+1 to not rush and just remove th
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
On 11/6/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The itest-conversations-ws breaks the continuum build as it uses port
8080.
I tried to replace the port with 8085 but I realized that it's very
annoying
to add the explicit URIs to all the including the service
Raymond Feng wrote:
The WSDL is used to access a live StockQuote web service:
http://www.xmethods.net/ve2/ViewListing.po?key=uuid:52A2D109-F37A-7DE1-E66B-C477BC8FF764.
Unfortunately I cannot find any license information about the WSDL. We
need to figure out a better way to handle these situt
Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hi JS,
The binding-notification-* samples can be run in isolation via ant run.
But also to run them from the command line, they assume that the
ntm runs on port 8083 and so the sample that is started first needs
to use that port. The sample command in the README for the
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of
Tuscany
SCA for Java.
The RC4 contains a few fixes to issues discovered in RC3. Thank you for
reporting and fixing the issues promptly.
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Hello,
Implementation scripts are currently resolved by the thread context
classloader.
The code in org.apache.tuscany.sca.extension.helper.utils.
ResourceUtil.readResource(String scriptName) is:
...
//FIXME The classloader should be passed in
ClassLoader cl =
Luciano Resende wrote:
As for the delete operation, I think we should only allow deletions of
a given table record and throw some exception when there is no ID
provided
Thoughts ?
I found the ability to delete the whole collection in the table useful
in the Tutorial's ShoppingCart for
Comments and more questions :) inline.
[snip]
wang feng wrote:
> hi Jean-Sebastien,
>
> Please see my comments below.
>
> Thanks,
> wangfeng
>
>
> On 2007-10-20, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> wang feng wrote:
>
A few comments inline.
[snip]
Douglas Leite wrote:
With the data being manipulated like a XmlStreamReader, I suppose that a
good way to implement the update operator is use a stream that contains the
modifications. Something like that:
int update(XmlStreamReader modifications);
Therefore, the
ant elder wrote:
On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
sca/tools/wsdl2java
sca/tools/java2wsdl
sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
sca/tools/
ant elder wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Mark Combellack to become
a Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Mark!
...ant
Congratulations Mark!
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-
ant elder wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simon Laws wrote:
I seem to remember in the past that adding remote bindings to services with
interfaces not marked as remotable used to cause and error or a warning.
This cropped up in the domain manager app which defines the following
component.
Simon Laws wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wro
601 - 700 of 3461 matches
Mail list logo
