hris Howe mentioned this quite a few times, about keeping primary keys clean and not incorrectly
coupled to interpreted application data. But Chris is probably a database designer.
Whatever works in OFBiz is useful.
Jonathon
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
I don't understand. Explain?
Jonat
the permission
settings (in SecurityGroupPermission) and the permission checking code
don't care at all.
The main reason for this is the support for entity-specific permissions,
and there would be thousands of those so we don't want to create them
explicitly.
-David
On May 8, 20
Hi John,
In this case, I think it is a mistake. It shouldn't be a "one-nofk" relation. Should be a "one"
relation. Not sure why there is any reason for this to be "one-nofk".
This isn't the usual "[primary key, fromDate]" composite key issue. That would have a reason for
ditching the FK.
Th
o other systems we introduce these ofbiz haches to may not use these
without the ofbiz encryption - that’s bad - as it should comply to the
standard or clearly state that’s its different/wrong as it seems not
to be
sha1.
Kind Regards
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jonathon -- Im
t pass again.
So other systems we introduce these ofbiz haches to may not use these
without the ofbiz encryption - that’s bad - as it should comply to the
standard or clearly state that’s its different/wrong as it seems not to be
sha1.
Kind Regards
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachri
Martin,
> A brief analysis shows that the implementation might start here being
> problematic:
>
> getDigestHash in trunk/base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/crypto/HashCrypt.java
Yup. That's where the OFBiz-specific implementation (or rehashing) is.
> Conclusion: the hashes in customer dbs are not re
Anne,
> So it is worth me making some effort to make my code good enough to be
> integrated.
I'm sure your codes will be good enough to be integrated; good codes make bug-catching easier, so
that's a powerful incentive.
As you mentioned in another post, you're finding [integrating your codes
ase caching versus entity engine caching just setup your database
to turn on caching for a certain table and then from the WebTools main
page click on the "Entity Engine" link under the "Performance Tests"
heading.
BTW, the session management in OFBiz is handled by Tomc
aching ever
be faster than local caching? In other words, I was asking because I
must be misunderstanding something as this doesn't seem to make any sense.
Not sure what you mean by "Oh my goodness. Not again." It's really not
that sensational, just basic computer stuff, real
entries? :) You
designed it, I believe. You would know. Thanks!
Jonathon
David E Jones wrote:
On Apr 19, 2008, at 2:04 AM, Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Chris is right that dynamic view entities are exactly like view
entities. Both run through the same Entity Engine. Caching by OFBiz is
also good
Hi Ritz,
First, the Entity Engine in OFBiz is really neat. You will want to avoid unstructured (and
possibly mile-long) strings of SQL commands if possible. Also good to avoid RDBMS-specific native
languages.
Chris is right that dynamic view entities are exactly like view entities. Both run t
ated into the main code base.
I don't need to worry about the accounting side yet, so I'm leaving that
area of GST madness until (and if) I really need to deal with it.
Thanks for the heads up with order items. I'm just now starting to look
at that code properly.
Cheers,
Anne.
Jo
Hi Anne,
Yes, you're right. In fact, for just about EVERY project I did involving rentals or similar, I've
had to completely overhaul that Java file.
I've found myself coding very unique order calcs and handling for every unique business. Not sure
how any of those can be rolled into OFBiz for
man sent the following on 12/31/2007 2:11 AM:
http://ofbiz.apache.org/docs/control.html#RequestHandler
to my knowledge it is not used in ofbiz.
Jonathon -- Improov sent the following on 12/31/2007 1:33 AM:
Does it work? I'm talking about the attribute "external-view" for
subelement of a . How does it work?
Jonathon
Does it work? I'm talking about the attribute "external-view" for subelement of a
. How does it work?
Jonathon
Yes, that is possible.
Jonathon
Brendan Vogt wrote:
I think they put restrictions on the site as to what country may or may not
access it. All sites work from my PC, except this one.
-Original Message-
From: guo weizhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 8:34
About a few months back, I investigated similar OFBiz-SVN related issues.
You just have to keep re-trying until it works. Or search for the thread I
created for this. :)
Let me know if anyone here knows about SVN server/client and internet protocol such and wants to
discuss. But I doubt we hav
Cool. Reminds me of the controversy over using antiseptic to aid open wound
healing.
Most antiseptics were tested in vitro. In vivo tests results recently show marked differences from
prior in vitro results.
Hmm. Example... say... PVP-I and cadexomer iodine. PVP-I with low concentration actua
display whatever i want, as it may be troublesome to update the java code when
we upgrade ofbiz to higher version in future.
Thanks!
rgds,
Ryan
- Original Message ----
From: Jonathon -- Improov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 11 December, 2007 2:17:24 PM
Su
gs all set up, so you really only have 6 days. I
payed licensing fees for it for a couple of years, but stopped when the need
went away.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 10:07 PM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject:
Ryan,
Well, to answer your question specifically... you can't disable the sorting.
In folder /framework/base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/component , see file
ComponentConfig.java line 276.
All the webapp names are put into a java.util.TreeMap (webapp names are the keys). That TreeMap
sorts its ke
Or just hire a reverse-engineer to take this apart for you quickly. On average, 100K lines of
codes can be processed (or eliminated from "suspects list") inside of 1 hour.
I still haven't found a profiler software that can do what my human engineers do well. Some things
just can't be done by co
rote:
OK. I changed this line:
$JAVA $VMARGS -jar ofbiz.jar $* >>$OFBIZ_LOG 2>>$OFBIZ_LOG&
to
$JAVA $VMARGS -jar ofbiz.jar $* >>/dev/null 2>>/dev/null&
Not sure why OFBIZ_LOG is listed twice, but I'm no shell script guru.
- Original Message -
From: &qu
at it's
not completely correct coding form, sorry.
Jonathon
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Forms can be written in total widget or total FTL, not a combination.
That's the problem.
See the editcontactmech.ftl example I gave.
Also, see the skip-start and s
eeman wrote:
ignorant question.
if you can include a screen and a screen can include a form.
what am I missing.
Jonathon -- Improov sent the following on 12/4/2007 9:49 PM:
Skip,
Yes, I knew we can include screen widgets in FTL. I told you "screens as
building blocks", remember?
Sorry, it should be this:
Jonathon
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Skip,
Yes, I knew we can include screen widgets in FTL. I told you "screens as
building blocks", remember?
Also, check out ${sections.render('section_name')}, by the
er("component://ar/widget/opentaps/collections/screens/Collect
ionScreens.xml#collectionWorkArea")}
<#if chartURL?has_content>
<#else>
No chart Image
<#else>
${uiLabelMap.PartyNoPar
Skip,
Agreed. I usually redirect console.log to dev null (discard).
Log4J in OFBiz does capture output in rotated logs, so the console.log is just extra. Moreover,
debug messages shouldn't be done with System.out.println.
Jonathon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vince
It is my view that a product
None of the responses pertain to this thread? :(
Help? Anyone?
Jonathon
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Ah sheesh, too late to correct my own thoughts. Responses came in.
Anyway, notes to self here.
- Foreign keys must point to UNIQUE or PRIMARY indexes
I don't see a point in having a rel
Skip,
> First, I have read EVERY document I can get my hands on concerning Ofbiz
> ... nowhere in them is the tag mentioned and I am betting many other
> equally cool features.
There's was a remark by Andy some years back, kind of apologizing for lack of documentation.
Reason given was that OF
Skip,
> Ah well, "undocumented" is probably not the right word given that we all
> have the source. Perhaps "hidden" might be better? But no, that would
> imply the intent to hide something which is surely not the case. Perhaps
> "unpublished"?
Actually, for open source and free software, "as
s as well as ways to
creating
indexes on non-key fields. There is a great performance increase having
an
index in some tables. Now I have to do in manually inside of the DB which
is fine.
Skip
-----Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, Dece
tables. Now I have to do in manually inside of the DB which
is fine.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:08 AM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Entity engine, "many" relations, foreign keys
Ah, wait
quot; will mean a one-to-one foreign key constraint
enforced by the application.
No real foreign key will be created in database.
What do you think?
And now, to read the many responses...
Jonathon
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
More thoughts aloud.
> Of course, that would mean we ca
fields.
Speaking of "ON UPDATE CASCADE", should we allow an attribute in for this? Do we also
want to auto-detect the RDBMS being used, and scream a warning if we encounter one that doesn't
support "ON UPDATE CASCADE"?
Am I missing a whole chunk of the Entity Engine?
chId such that no such combination exists.
Advice? Or should we live without foreign key checks in such cases?
Jonathon
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
I found this from David Jones:
> Foreign keys are done for type "one" relationships, not type many. A
type
> "many" relati
I found this from David Jones:
> Foreign keys are done for type "one" relationships, not type many. A type
> "many" relationship is usually just the reverse direction of a type "one"
> relationship so the FK covers both.
>
> What would it mean to have a foreign key on a type "many" relationship?"
That's right. We cannot nest comments.
The 1st "" closes the comment. The 2nd one is an error.
Jonathon
Vikas Mayur wrote:
I do not see any nested comment in ofbiz-containers.xml in the latest
version.
Can you please mention which version are you talking about.
If I am correct, We can not nes
library of
macros (sold, privatized, again, sigh).
Jonathon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Widgets in FTL is the only way currently to get some things done if you want
to use widgets.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December
are better.
I did not see anything about including widget in FTL.
guess I missed that.
Jonathon -- Improov sent the following on 12/3/2007 5:36 PM:
Actually, this isn't going backwards. It's going forward.
Some screens are best done in ftl. This was discussed countless times
before.
ets.
Jonathon
BJ Freeman wrote:
seems your going backwards.
remove the ftl and use screen widgets that include formwidgets.
add a class (style) and use the css for aligning tables.
Jonathon -- Improov sent the following on 12/2/2007 8:48 PM:
The problem I'm facing now is that form widgets a
clude formwidgets.
add a class (style) and use the css for aligning tables.
Jonathon -- Improov sent the following on 12/2/2007 8:48 PM:
The problem I'm facing now is that form widgets always have the start
and end wrappers ( and wrapper.
Getting form widgets to say skip-table could solve this probl
The problem I'm facing now is that form widgets always have the start and end wrappers (cellspacing...> and done in ftl.
Attributes skip-start and skip-end only remove the wrapper.
Getting form widgets to say skip-table could solve this problem, though it's not intuitive to use
form widgets as
red screen directly to the response's output stream. That wouldn't
work because in the two file formats mentioned - xsl-fo and zip - there
needs to be an intermediate document that is parsed and converted.
-Adrian
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Adrian,
The rest of my email (of whi
that same method, it would solve your issue with serving up large files of arbitrary binary
data.
Jonathon
Adrian Crum wrote:
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Why render to a temp file? Why not simply render to a byte array like
ScreenFopViewHandler (pdf) does? Temp files need cleaning up.
Because t
TED] wrote:
I'd be happy to buy the first copy! Count me in for a paid subscription.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 7:32 PM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Widgets, Forms, Containers, etc
Coming soon, so
Skip,
A quick one here, since I'm currently writing on this privately.
A screen widget is your stackable building block. Use it everywhere.
Screen widgets can include other screen widgets.
For what you want, use , which outputs a HTML . Use CSS to float the s left
or right.
Sometimes, you m
Coming soon, soon. :)
I'm currently ripping through the framework codes to write docs for framework usage and behavior.
Quirks and all.
Jonathon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well Jonathon, here a topic ripe for the author just breaking to get out.
BTW, the author of the mention document, Torst
Currently, it seems that the element inside a merely triggers a re-reading
of the 's element, where is the parent of . Is this true?
Any plans to complete this implementation anytime soon?
Jonathon
About SVN being development oriented, I agree!
As for whether compressHTML would make any diff, I thought it won't. Extra spaces compress really
well with zip, so traffic won't be affected much.
Maybe javascript works faster (gets parsed more quickly) with compressedHTML on?
Jonathon
David E
Skip,
If you're talking about being retarded and working many projects for fun without money, then yes,
I'm worse than you. If it's just about being retarded, I think I'm in some hall of fame.
I've been watching your personality, Skip. Pardon me. Are you a techie? I bet you are great with
cus
Why render to a temp file? Why not simply render to a byte array like ScreenFopViewHandler (pdf)
does? Temp files need cleaning up.
The best way I can think of now is to have a generic ByteArrayViewHandler or similar, that outputs
any arbitrary byte array to the browser (via HttpServletResponse
Not too difficult.
In your controller.xml and in the "findTransaction" request map, have 2 "success" responses, 1
named "success" and the other named "onlyOne". In the , do your finding of transactions,
and redirect to the proper response path depending on whether there is only one transaction
Yup, for a few UK clients. I thought it's already in OFBiz?
Oh, wait. I think not. I remember a heated argument at beginning of this year. Some European folks
complained that VAT isn't in OFBiz.
By the way, I had also done GST for Singapore and neighbors.
As for my "inputs", I notice that suc
Now that you mention it, yeah, that doesn't seem possible.
Even with , you cannot have "conditional joiners". Joins in are
restricted to "key-to-key/field" (equality) joins only.
What's , by the way? Anybody knows? I don't see it used?
It shouldn't be difficult to extend so that it supports
Sorry to come in so late in this thread.
Did you mean you want to introduce your own new variable in web.xml, something like how
"mainDecoratorLocation" works?
Jonathon
sqlien wrote:
Unfortunately i have not succeed.
Thanks for your responses
BJ Freeman wrote:
Did you secceed?
If yes
Walter,
SQL cross-products are quite simple, actually, although not immediately obvious
to start with.
Consider that every join you make is for a specific purpose.
Here's a quick contrived example, for illustration only, not congruent with
OFBiz entities.
Say you join "Party.employees" to "P
sary(??). I think I misunderstood him again.
Jonathon
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Jonathon,
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Maybe we could write an eBook on "Keeping Up With Official OFBiz
Updates -- Version Control Strategies"? Will that be useful to the
OFBiz community.
Jonathon
onathon
BJ Freeman wrote:
I am a simple person
I find that keeping my code in a separate application folder lets me
dump the newest version in and not worry about overwriting my code.
and you make the human part of the individual evaluation as simple.
from my experience of 25 years of programming I have
Yes, the "vendor branch" is a clean copy. You're right.
The point is to be able to bring in "official updates" into your customized branch in a systematic
fashion. And that is to be able to identify *individual* official updates in as unit a granularity
as possible. Some change sets can be huge
BJ,
I would ask that you say your original message again too. I couldn't understand
either.
How would running any (typo "and"?) SECAs cause problems with a (typo "an"?) SECA, or any SECA at
all? If I understand it right (I'm sure I didn't), it sounds very much like "eating bread and
butter is
Case,
As long as your OFBiz is deployed on the server you want to access, you can access OFBiz via any
names that server has.
It can be 127.0.0.1 (if you're accessing from the OFBiz server itself), or whatever IP addresses
the OFBiz computer has. Or even any domain names assigned to that mach
Vedam,
I'm gonna try to comprehensively document all such ERP-related stuff in OFBiz, starting next year
Feb. You wanna join me? It's gonna be a huge project. Yeah, OFBiz is that huge.
Currently, as suggested by BJ, we need to figure out the meaning of those fields by
reverse-engineering on-t
lues. So it still doesn't address our issue of moving users (50,000+) to a new system.
Is this correct, or are you suggesting the changes you outlined would also work with existing encrypted pw's from osCommerce.
Vince Clark
Global Era
The Freedom of Open Source
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No problems with this approach. Except...
Isn't it possible to clear specific cache lines in a cache? More fine-grained.
We will need to do a good comb-through to find all spots in OFBiz where the price rule can be
affected. For each of those spots, wire in a "cache clear" or "cache recalculate
e Clark
Global Era
The Freedom of Open Source
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(303) 493-6723
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathon -- Improov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2007 9:58:00 AM (GMT-0700) America/Denver
Subject: Re: Using O
Check the length of the password hash in osCommerce. It could be 35
characters, 2 characters longer than MD5's 32 (with a ":" in between).
Next, look into osCommerce password-generating codes. I believe
osCommerce password hashes are salted.
There's no way you can easily reverse-engineer thos
A christmas list is fine, IMHO. Always nice to have more feedback than less. The list should
represent real-world requirements.
With a longer list, we'll have more items to choose from. A long list isn't going to kill us, long
as we can still exercise the prudence/right to pick the few we can c
-----
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:14 PM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Management style for OFBiz project (was shipments made for
out of stock items)
> You're in Singapore, am I remembering that right Jonathon?
Yup.
o
think would be valuable for all, but not as a top-down management sort
of thing, more as a chance for people to collaborate more effectively by
communicating what we'd all like to see in the near and distant future
for the project.
-David
On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Jonathon -- Improov
Jonathon, you obviously don't live
in the U.S where there are two lawmakers for every citizen! :)
-----Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:52 PM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: shipments made for out of stock it
I agree with BJ.
A lawyer friend here (very good lawyer too) also had the same idea that patents make for good
control. I told him the exact same thing that BJ just mentioned. Patents make for clear
concessions (for the patent holder).
But then, lawyers do make a living suing for patent infri
Well, I think you're being a "jerk" (firm?) about this. But jerks get the job
done.
I've been accused way too many times of being too soft. If I were married, my wife would complain
that I'm always "fooling around" being Mr. Fun Guy.
About finding yourself "coaching" people too often, maybe t
Certainly inappropriate. There are also many other inappropriate (or largely missing) parts in
OFBiz, like EFT handling (different in my part of the world, maybe).
But we have to consider that we have many cooks (we all want in on it), and just one soup (OFBiz,
framework, foundation functionali
Skip,
Just my rambling 2 cents here. :)
It takes time to write "If it has wide appeal and does not break existing users, we can consider
it". Quicker to write, "It'll most likely be rejected" (so ask me more about why, or just shoot me).
I'd like to bring up a curious experience in my 13-year
A recent news also stated that SAP intends to target really small businesses, I think with an ASP
or SAS model. Like NetSuite.
Jonathon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought you all might be interested as SAP is the only real Ofbiz
competition:
SAN FRANCISCO -- German enterprise software company S
Currently, I just go through them all. I maintain my own database of records that point to JIRA
issues.
Yes, it's true that there's a great wealth of submitted codes we can reuse. As for why it isn't in
OFBiz, it's just not all that easy to fit every imaginable submission into a central framewo
I don't think Dynamic Views can help here. The "purchasing recommendation" is generated once, and
is then presented again and again to the end-user. It is not generated every time the end-user
needs to see it.
How about creating a permanent table for both "purchasing recommendation" and aging A
Hi Vince,
> I think where I am getting confused is that if you render content via CMS you
> are already past the point of having access to lower level functionality such
> as screen widgets and the controller.xml file.
Like David said, this certainly is possible in theory.
What it takes may be
> The main reason is that version control of code for reliable rollouts of a
> tested set of code is vital for most sites (unless their tolerance for errors
> and bugs is very high).
>
> The more common approach is to have the templates in general in the file
> system using current methods, and pu
Yes, your interpretation is correct.
It doesn't need an external database, since it has Derby. But it's usual to run OFBiz with a
competent RDBMS. Derby is purely Java, and so may be slower than MySQL and other RDBMSes.
All you really need is a JDK to compile OFBiz, and a JVM to run it.
Jonat
Agreed. The field availableToPromise should only be updated when an actual
commitment is made.
Same for inventory reservations.
Question is, will the availableToPromise field, if value is 1, be put into negative value when a
few customers do an "add-to-cart" at the same time, and then check ou
ork for a particular company. I would expect my work to be
used by many, so the ROI increases with each installation.
I see room for both methods depending on the customers' needs.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03
t generate
responses, typically HTML pages, to HTTP requests from clients much the same
as ASP
Java and JavaScript are commonly mistaken as somehow related to each other
however this is not true
cheers
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the default is inclue="all". Which means, pk and nonpk fields are
included.
Jonathon
sqlien wrote:
if I make without
include="pk" / include="nonpk", pk and non pk fields are implicitly passed
IN or not ?
sqlien wrote:
hi,
Can anyone tell me what mean these two lines in services.
Compiere has a similar "auto-deploy" mechanism. So that solves the "deploy" issue. There's still
the issue of creating and maintaining 2 separate UI modules: one for Java app, the other for browser.
Which reminds me. OFBiz browser UIs don't care about the case where javascript is disabled.
Anyw
at any time (and no associated aggravation). Their
work is never interrupted or slowed (assuming the database server is not
overloaded.)
5. "Those folks writing the "offloading algorithms" won't know how
fast/slow my computer is." Gads Jonathon, I couldnt agree more. I
> You might be surprised by how expensive such a solution would be to
> create/maintain/deploy and how little it will help on server resources.
I have many clients wanting to move away from that distributed (client codes) model to the
centralized (server codes) model. Yes, it is proving to be ex
Sometimes, when you need only the reference to an existing record, you will want service callers
to pass in PK (primary key) fields. PK fields are combined to form the "key" to look up a
particular record. Non-PK fields form the "data" for the record.
Other times, when you need to update an exi
Er... correction. I think my clients needed to use SDK 1.4 . And there was no support for 64-bit
AMD (or 64-bit anything, can't recall).
There should be SDKs for 64-bit AMD and Intel from SDK 1.5 and above.
Jonathon
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
For 64-bit AMD? That'll be good. Last I
Not sure if overrides an . There's .
In , there's also , so you can selectively exclude some attributes in
the entity specified in .
Usually, you'll use to override the "optional" attribute of an
attribute. For eg,
I skipped several attributes in the above eg.
Jonathon
Amine AZZI
rivers.
C
-Original Message-----
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 9:27 PM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Linux distro?
A couple of clients I have use 64-bit AMD machines. I recall there weren't
any official Sun SDKs
supporting
A couple of clients I have use 64-bit AMD machines. I recall there weren't any official Sun SDKs
supporting those machines. My clients were forced to use some other non-Sun SDKs. Not good. Lots
of bizarre issues.
As for 64-bit gotchas, I wouldn't be surprised. Newer hardwares often have new pro
.
Jonathon
BJ Freeman wrote:
Jonathon:
I believe the original context was the manpower to do this.
it sounds like you experiencing the same problem and want to shift it to
the ofbiz svn.
Still though it is a manpower problem even if the ideas put forth are
good ones.
Jonathon -- Improov sent
OFBiz structure. Very convenient.
A separate text file, conveniently copied and modified from the MD5 manifest, will serve as
documentation of the version and source of the libraries, much like at
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Libraries+Included+in+OFBiz .
Jonathon
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
A Linux distro that works perfectly with the JDK/JRE needed. The JDK/JRE used
now is 1.5.
Beyond that consideration, you should just go with a distro you like most, one that feels most
cuddly or shiny or something.
Jonathon
Philip Laing wrote:
Thanks BJ ... Now what distro would be more sui
component.xml as
The question is, how can I override the original definition without
modifying Ofbiz code. i.e. can I put an identically named service
definition in hot-deploy or somewhere and have all of Ofbiz use my new
calculateProductPrice?
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- I
Roux wrote:
Jonathon, Skip,
I'm not sure of what Jonathon means (have not time to look at
services_authorizedotnet.xml right now); maybe he wants to allude that
there is an interface mechanism for services too. Just look for the word
"interface" in services definitions.
Jacques
ion is, how can I override the original definition without
modifying Ofbiz code. i.e. can I put an identically named service
definition in hot-deploy or somewhere and have all of Ofbiz use my new
calculateProductPrice?
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Yes, overriding that method will mean you won't touch the OFBiz codes. That could mean you can
continue to use your custom method, while still conveniently watching the community's updates to
the original method.
Such a method override will also kinda "document" your custom method as "being rel
1 - 100 of 395 matches
Mail list logo
