That oem page just turns out to be about amps/turns not being as accurate
as a full calculation.
No actual coil gauss tests were made despite the writer claiming that they
should be.
Hence no magic as such, the MOD-A is calculated to be no stronger despite a
higher amps/turns, given an identical
With IndieGoGo, you can get partial funding unlike kickstarter.
So even if it doesn't reach their goal they very likely get to do what they
can with what they got.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
the crowd-funding effort on IndieGoGo
quarters
down to 7.09%. Those are not good odds.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/probability-rossi-is-real-is-now-28/
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote
, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:51 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kevin, I think you failed to account for CME and sunspot activity being
very low.
Elevated sunspot activity is related to aberrant behavior
Easy enough to take 2 salt water aquariums, fill both with sea stars etc...
Expose one to a water softening device, and the other as the control.
Second test, take some hard water and measure it's hardness somehow? And
then expose to Radar.
Tell Marine Biologists about your discovery.
Should
vapor does not imply that a
Lamborghini can be designed to use that principle or that the car will sell
in the marketplace. Designing the car requires far more science and
engineering fields than demonstrating gasoline detonation.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:53 AM, John Berry berry.joh
what we pewrceive as
shrunken hydrogen.
*From:* John Berry [mailto:berry.joh...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:54 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real
upwards, to 35%
Kevin, I can only assume you have
IS real, or he is NOT real..
There is no such thing as probability in reality.
I see..
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:12 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze's ego is astounding, thinking that he has things so well worked out
that his ramblings about probability have meaning.
Even
Blaze, a fine verbal joust.
But you must admit it is not even close to reality.
Now you are engaging in a factious argument, Rossi and his eCat are not
wave functions yet to be collapsed.
Good comedy, but if I were to take you at your word, I would consider you
needing to be picked up by some
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Everything in the universe is a wave function waiting to be collapsed.
This is how the universal simulator avoids pointless CPU processing.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:59 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
majority of LENR
experiments were in PdD because those were the ones that replicated more
often. After Rossi, the vast majority of experiments seem to be in NiH.
And he's on the precipice of generating LENR as an industrial reality.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:11 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
Kevin, I can only assume you have misunderstood what I was saying.
Earlier you said: Not even Pons Fleischmann can lay claim to having found
the effect.
Which sound to me something like the great (not even) PF can't claim they
definitively had a real effect, so Neither can Rossi be rightly
Blaze's ego is astounding, thinking that he has things so well worked out
that his ramblings about probability have meaning.
Even if he were that good at working out probability, a few facts remain
that make it worthless.
1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen or they
.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:12 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze's ego is astounding, thinking that he has things so well worked out
that his ramblings about probability have meaning.
Even if he were that good at working out probability, a few facts remain
that make it worthless
Oh, and you are more likely to die from an infection caught in hospital
than die from all forms of accident combined.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:39 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Put a gun to my head with 10,000,000 chambers and a bullet in only one of
them selected at random
So, it could be a good way to remove nickel pollution...
OR if it is doing some biological transmutation maybe it is making nickle...
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
A new plant species with an unusual lifestyle – it eats nickel for a
living – has
I did not think quarks were meant to exist in such separation?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
More:
It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction as
its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel each
In researching my near field electromagnetic inertia concept (which MUST
occur if near-field transmission is niot instantaneous) I found research
that seems to indicate that until a photon detaches the near-field seems to
propagate instantaneously.
I should also note the possibly obvious, near-fields are not necessarily
near.
They can can be extremely distant if the frequency is low or infinite if
essentially zero.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:49 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
In researching my near field electromagnetic
of an energy flow.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter7.html
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Mar 14, 2014 5:42 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic inertia
Then my idea is bust.
But so is Special Relativity
I have shared this concept before, here is try 2, I'd really like some
feedback I hope it is easy to understand and I think it is potentially
important.
The concept is that if a coil powdered with flat DC is suddenly moved, each
side of the solenoid sees it is in a new position and yet because
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
Three points for clarification:
How is the solenoid move, along the axis, perpendicular to the axis or
rotate around the axis?
In the case of increasing inertia, there is one solenoid and if you saw it
as an O
would consistently have an arc concaved in the opposite direction
from the Sun's rotation. I do not think this is observed. However, it may
not have been looked for.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, March
the
field lines come out straight from the Sun.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, March 14, 2014 1:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic inertia
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Bob Cook frobertc
to SR.
John
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:24 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:28 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, but you will have fun trying to visualize this with SR.
SR assumes that each sees the other as length contracted, as clock
Here is a snippet from the Navy:
Quote:
In principle, the critics of GPS in the relativity debate have not been
completely wrong. The neglected 7 factor could hurt us. The OCS software
should be reformulated. Nevertheless, in practice, neglect of relativity
does not now contribute measurably to
I was discussing elsewhere if a photon has mass, there are many reasons to
argue that it does, it imparts a force as it is emitted, absorbed or
reflected.
A mirrored sphere would reflect light and if the sphere was accelerated the
blue/red shifting of light should lead to unequal forces.
If you
, the
inertial mass would seem to turn negative, it would not resist acceleration.
John
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:43 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
I was discussing elsewhere if a photon has mass, there are many reasons to
argue that it does, it imparts a force as it is emitted
BTW the DOE are working on a variation of this concept for NASA...
http://science.howstuffworks.com/electromagnetic-propulsion1.htm
Though their version is switched, much like a patent for a similar idea I
have seen.
John
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:05 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
upon as
simultaneous events when envisaged from a system which is in motion
relatively to that system.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:54 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.neoclassicalrelativity.org/
There are 6 simple videos showing arguments against various parts
are separated by a given distance in a stationary frame and the other two
clocks A' and B' are separated by the same distance in a moving frame
aligned along a closely parallel axis. When the pairs of clocks brush past
they all start ticking.
Harry
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:58 PM, John Berry berry.joh
Jed, I am really curious how you envision a cold fusion on a consumer level
to work?
Obviously it would need an initial power source to start the reaction, the
reaction would generate heat which would need to be converted to
electricity with some realistic efficiency level.
Then the chemistry of
to support
a LENR co-generation system. Many people will still use grid power.
LENR will mostly be used to retrofit grid based power plants.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:46 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Jed, I am really curious how you envision a cold fusion on a consumer
level
http://www.neoclassicalrelativity.org/
There are 6 simple videos showing arguments against various parts of
Special Relativity.
http://www.youtube.com/user/NeoclassicRelativity
The Doppler effect is not handwaving, it is a very real effect that would
notably increase the frequency of the light emitted from the electrons
hugely (enough to account for the evidence).
Additionally absolute time dilation from the electron moving through the
aether at near light speed could
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:32 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
John, this device is real.
No doubt, so is the Doppler effect, which *will* be present.
Read the article carefully and you will understand how the frequency is
accurately explained by Lorentz contraction. Do you
-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Mar 10, 2014 8:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Time Dilation and Free-electron Laser
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:32 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
John, this device is real.
No doubt, so
I do not have enough evidence to make more sense of this, but if the photon
becomes an x-ray because of length contraction, 2 things occur to me.
Firstly if the electron is not passing by enough magnets to gain the
required frequency as far as the Lab frame is concerned, then even if the
Some of the arguments are weak, but the one with the electrons in the
closed tube is pretty solid and clear.
The same issue occurs with any rotated disk.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Another opposing view:
findings? I'm debating
someone elsewhere and she is not only unconvinced, she's far smarter and
better educated than I am.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Special Relativity has made the assumption that the speed of light is
constant
Special Relativity has a real problem with instantaneous communication,
even when it must be possible as in this case.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:54 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Both frames are in sliding contact so it takes no time for the sprayer to
leave behind a mark.
I
, it is not disallowed.
John
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
If you want to believe it is settled science as many do, you are welcome
to do so.
But I question it because no one
, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
John:
Do you have a citation for all these many findings? I'm debating
someone elsewhere and she is not only unconvinced, she's far smarter and
better educated than I am.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Berry
, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:40 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
The Sagnac effect is a very good example.
Then there are various interferometry drift experiments, and most have
shown some degree of drift, just far less that a static aether the earth
moves through, positive results are more
is not only unconvinced, she's far smarter and
better educated than I am.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Special Relativity has made the assumption that the speed of light is
constant, this is despite many findings otherwise.
Oh, and one somehow got left out of my list... If NASA doesn't think the
speed of light is insurmountable...
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/05/28/nasa-admits-they-are-working-to-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:48 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
Eric, you are welcome to your opinion, here are the facts.
2 thought experiments I have presented created a paradox that has turned
out to be correct, disproving a commonly held component of General
Relativity, that G-force has time dilation equivalent to time dilation of
gravity (2 wikipedia
The Sagnac effect is where light is sent both ways around a loop (fibre
optic cable loop/coil or an arrangement of mirrors) and the time it takes
light to complete the loop is increased in one direction and decreased in
the other from the rotation, in other words one trip would be seen to
exceed C
in that
portion.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:34 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
The Sagnac effect is where light is sent both ways around a loop (fibre
optic cable loop/coil or an arrangement of mirrors) and the time it takes
light to complete the loop is increased in one direction
What about different dielectric values different for the plastic? (or more
in-depth analysis dielectric hysteresis)
Maybe different electro-positivety/negativity? Sounds like a long shot in
a practical sense.
Could the spectra that gets through show a different pattern?
What about a UV
I think the better argument is the length contraction of the circumference
of a quickly rotating circular disk, if you put a measuring tape around it,
you will get a result that the disk insists can't be as it sees the
measuring tape as connected.
John
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:23 AM, David
From a discussion in another group, I can say that the view of SR would be
that what is simultaneous in the train frame would not be viewed as
simultaneous in the track frame.
But the rotary argument is hard to fault. If a disk has a circumference of
100 units of length, and with length
I have the following argument which responds to your points I believe.
Optional:* Argument why rotating frames must experience time distortion
under SR:*
*Firstly we can observe that if the linear velocity of the rim of a
rotating disk would have the observer on that disk see a light clock in a
, 2014 at 2:14 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The linear example you describe below.
Harry
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:09 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
I very much appreciate your saying so Harry!
You give me faith in humans!
Which SR experiment are you saying I
they aren't receding at high speed so we cam observe the
time dilation that is meant to be happening in real time so to speak.
John
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:33 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
If you increase the size of the disk in the non-linear example until it is
almost linear
in
Since the mirrors are biased to their frame (whatever that is) then um
well, er..
Well how can you describe reality with a theory of unreality.
John
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:58 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading the wiki page, essentially wiki and I are saying
have a real impact on the actual experiment, requiring higher
linear velocity and greater distances to pick the results up without
improving the clock, but as a thought experiment is got a bit simpler.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:20 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you go: http
. So does the thought experiment designed to test SR.
You should illustrate that as well.
harry
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:20 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Here you go: http://imageshack.com/a/img198/4812/j2s2.png
BTW if acceleration doesn't cause time dilation, even though
If you are in an accelerating space elevator, and you throw a clock upwards
and then it falls down, the clock looks to be accelerating, but it is in a
constant inertial frame not accelerating and so your time should slow due
to acceleration according to the equivalence principle of General
. In addition, it's an accelerating
acceleration vector.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:57 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
If you are in an accelerating space elevator, and you throw a clock
upwards and then it falls down, the clock looks to be accelerating, but it
is in a constant
Leaking, I guess you are implying the equivalence principle is not meant to
apply to dropped objects?
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:19 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Leaking, this does not apply to the elevator example though.
And the equivalence principle states that G-force
that you're too inept to
figure out a way to differentiate between them, but instead that there is *no
possible local experiment you can perform to tell the difference, no matter
how clever you are*.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:17 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Leaking, I guess you
believe me but you can't explain it.
But please this time, don't ignore me.
John
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:43 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
If I am wrong about this and this is an expected difference, then
the equivalence principle is often wrongly stated to be far more
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:12 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
Not at all, however, if you are accelerating at a rate away from the body
that the clock is falling towards,
No offence to you, but I thought that misunderstanding this was impossible.
You are not accelerating away from a
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:38 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I am missing something at this point as well. Isn't dilation an
effect of VELOCITY and not acceleration?
Both!
General Relativity states that time dilation occurs in gravity fields and
with acceleration (G-Force)
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:01 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
YOU said falls down. That assumes a mass and direction. Your statement
of the experiment assumes a massive body being accelerated away from. if
we are talking about in free space, then that is different.
In the
First off, it sure seems that Wikipedia and I am sure I have read books
that state that according to General Relativity, Time dilation occurs in
gravity and inertial acceleration alike since they are equivalent.
The gravitational form of time dilation is co-present with an inertial
frame.
It is
dilation/contraction
2014-02-27 0:40 GMT+01:00 John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:12 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
Not at all, however, if you are accelerating at a rate away from the
body that the clock is falling towards,
No offence to you, but I
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:54 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=237212
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:44 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
But reading this thread:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=237212
between the discs and clocks is not clear.
Can you draw a diagram of the experiment?
harry
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:34 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
For brevity, I will explain it in sentence. and the possible results in a
few more, But the longer form solves questions
Special Relativity
Sorry. I should have probably included the full version at least once.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
What does SR stand for or mean?
Bob
*From:* John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2014 3
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Then there is the quantum of largeness: S (Carl Sagan's number) which is
billions and billions
And there are 2 different billions 1,000,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000
And 2 different trillions 1,000,000,000,000,000,000
For brevity, I will explain it in sentence. and the possible results in a
few more, But the longer form solves questions and objections:
Take 2 light sensors separated at an appropriate distance, the censors are
shaped like CD and are transparent, designated A and B, rotate them at high
enough
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Europeans use a comma instead of a decimal point.
Yes, very confusing in some cases.
Russians putting dollar signs at the end: 100$
May be consistent with the what we do other things, so it is logical, but
still wrong.
David?
I really am anxiously waiting for evidence.
Not trying to rush you, but just don't forget ok?
Assuming you are still talking to me.
Yeah, patience isn't my strong suit.
John
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:51 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM
?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 23, 2014 5:31 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Time Dilation impossibility
David?
I really am anxiously waiting for evidence.
Not trying to rush you, but just don't forget
Here we go again...
I have strongly argued that according to SR, magnetic fields occur due to
relative motion between electric charges, maybe also electric fields and an
observer with a relative motion to the charge/fields.
This view makes a lot of sense because you can even show that all
, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Here we go again...
I have strongly argued that according to SR, magnetic fields occur due to
relative motion between electric charges, maybe also electric fields and an
observer with a relative motion to the charge/fields
Absolutely Harry!
Another thing is that if acceleration changes anything, then you end up in
a even weirder paradox.
Let's propose that when travelling at near C the twin that accelerated
picks up a hitch-hiker alien that has always been in this reference frame.
Then when the twins are passing
a ridiculous
paradox as you say.
So this seems to be evidence for an aether, to be added to the big pile of
evidence for the establishment to ignore.
John
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:10 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
I don't see why the direction of the 2 friends matter
When it comes to the ability to observe the rate of time the other party is
experiencing it is everything.
If one friend sees the other as receding, this
Time to go back to work on the ol' FTL drive...
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
From the Daily Grail:
In his wonderful fictional series The Hitchhiker's Guide to the
Galaxy, the late Douglas Adams introduced the 'Total Perspective
Vortex' - a
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:51 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Harry, I am currently supporting the idea that acceleration is the main
reason for the clock differences because it would not appear reasonble to
expect a difference in clock readings if both observers continued to move
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:46 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I do not follow your description of the trains. What is the purpose of
the relative speed being 99.9%c during construction?
Because the reason given for which twin in the classic twin paradox is
younger comes down to
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
John, it is great that we are now in agreement concerning my example of
the two parallel moving charges. It comes as a complete surprise to me
that you now accept the fact that the field observed by the stationary lab
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:53 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Dramatic!
As alternate way of revealing the paradox, I imagined the two charged
balls connected by a spring which counter balances the force of repulsion.
In the reference frame where the balls are moving, a magnetic force
, it won't exist in
electric to magnetic.
John
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:14 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:53 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Dramatic!
As alternate way of revealing the paradox, I imagined the two charged
balls connected
My view on SR is of course that it can not be possible.
But it does give some interesting and correct answers, now impossible is
still impossible, but...
If we reduce the magnet in Einstein's example to an electromagnet, or
better yet just one straight wire carrying a DC current. (or a macro
evidenced on the rotating frame?
I have heard of HV charged disks effecting a compass.
John
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:46 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
My view on SR is of course that it can not be possible.
But it does give some interesting and correct answers, now
due to 250 experiments performed?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:51 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-First-Test-That-Proves-General-Theory-of-Relativity-Wrong-20259.shtml
According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, a moving mass
should
I would have thought that relative motion to an electric field would
probably create the observation of a magnetic field, both in SR (that I
reject) and in an aether model.
But I am starting to question that, I would appreciate any answer to the
following:
Take a long piece of dowel, apply
in superconductivity.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:43 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
I would have thought that relative motion to an electric field would
probably create the observation of a magnetic field, both in SR (that I
reject) and in an aether model.
But I am starting to question
I have been trying to conceive of experiments that would give a different
result based on if a magnetic field was created by only the electrons in a
wire, or also created by the protons in a wire dependant on relative
velocity.
I have thought of many that do not even need testing and furnish the
in an N-machine without 2 reference frames
for the same reasons, opposing voltages are induced.
With a hall effect censor the current through the censor provides the
second reference frame.
A hall effect censor looks a lot like a solid state N-machine.
John
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:01 PM, John
Here is a sample:
http://benthamscience.com/ebooks/Sample/9781608053995-sample.pdf
You can buy it for $30 here:
http://www.eurekaselect.com/100222/chapter/study-of-light-interaction-with-gravity-impulses-and-measurements-of-the-speed-of-gravity-impulse
You may be able to get it off this guy
This post contains 2 thoughts, one an idea of how to show why time dilation
in SR can't work, the other to point to interesting conclusions of various
arguments.
First is a train on a large turntable, the larger the turn table the less G
force needs to be.
The turn table either accelerates to a
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:21 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Let's take a pulse of light, some observers on the ground measuring the
time this pulse takes to traverse 2 detectors 1 meter apart, they get
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:38 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Are you arguing that this is impossible?
This is a thought experiment so it only has to be theoretically possible
to make such a measuring
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Remember this one?
http://phys.org/news/2011-11-scientists-vacuum.html
*Scientists create light from vacuum*
The speed of light in a vacuum can be effected by EMF based influences
such as magnetic fields, spin
principles will help codify the
theory of everything.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18612-knowing-the-mind-of-god-seven-theories-of-everything.html#.UwSqfs6YbyQ
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:44 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Axil Axil janap
201 - 300 of 975 matches
Mail list logo
