Hello everyone,
I've recently upgraded from Win2k+Xmail 1.25 to RHEL5.5 + Xmail 1.27.
This is also on a new hosting provider in a new city.
So much has changed.
I used to be able to send to this person @ dinglepartners.com.au
However now I get error 256.
Immediately I assumed th
rd as the key on the
challenge
More explanations here for these AUTH methods
:http://www.samlogic.net/articles/smtp-commands-reference-auth.htm
Expecting the 'client' use PLAIN or LOGIN to help you quickly :)
Regards
Francis
>-Message d'origine-
>De : xmail-boun...@xmail
l wireshark and view
it a little easier - perhaps Wireshark will decode it for my viewing?
Rob :-)
-Original Message-
From: xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org [mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]
On Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:28 AM
To: 'XMail Users Maili
g]De
la part de Rob Arends
Envoye : mardi 18 janvier 2011 14:43
A : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Knowing who is failing Auth Logins
Hello,
I'm running xmail 1.27 on RHEL5.5
The SMTP logs are showing a single AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN every hour at xx:00
hours.
It is coming from t
Hello,
I'm running xmail 1.27 on RHEL5.5
The SMTP logs are showing a single AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN every hour at xx:00
hours.
It is coming from the same PC I believe, although IP changes, the ISP and
area indicated by the rDNS suggests it is the same PC.
Most mail clients attempt POP3 more
Hi Davide,
This raises an interesting question...
How do 3rd party IMAP implementations handle multiple Xmail domains.
It looks like the IMAP instance is pointed to one Xmail domain only.
Has anyone got any experience with IMAP (any brand) and Xmail with multiple
domains?
Can it be done with one
Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:22 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> Your probably correct.
> Although Xmail won't care - it will handle either.
Bingo. XMail is not as dumb as other softwares, s
ink if Rob want to fully convert windows maibox content to unix =
maildirs,
he need to use some dos2unix command (or d2u ? don't remember exactly =
the
tool name on linux) in the proposed script, no ?
:)
Francis
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EM
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RICK AND SHEILA
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:54 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
Rob, I have signed on to X-Mail to see if it will allow me to receive my
vehicle report from On- Star. Is this going to help?
They send in X-Mail Text. Rick
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 2:22 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> Davide,
>
> If I wanted to use the default unix sto
doing nothing, but on a cellular level, I'm quite
busy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 8:01 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Ar
So this will make my planned IMAP4 implementation easier.
I'm running on w32 and planning to go Linux (mail is my only legacy W32
platform) and then implement a native Linux IMAP4 server, but I remember
lots of work arounds for the CRLF/LF issue, so I was not exited about the
idea of implementing
On Thursday, September 04, 2008 4:22 AM, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
>> Davide, just out of curiosity.
>>
>> Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
>>
>> Could you have read the file and converted LF->CRLF
Davide, just out of curiosity.
Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
Could you have read the file and converted LF->CRLF on the fly while sending
the TCP data?
Or does that create a performance hit that is unacceptable?
Rob :-)
___
Harald,
You need to be clear on the difference:
Relay denied and Server down *ARE* different things.
If it is DOWN, then the next one would be used, but
If it responds with a deny, then you have an answer, end of story.
Think of DNS, it does the same thing.
If a server *responds* then your next
Hal,
You are very close to the solution.
Xmail on windows can by run as xmail2 also.
Just copy the whole xmail dir structure to a new location.
Rename the xmail binary to xmail2
Copy the registry for gnu/xmail to gnu/xmail2 (match the binary name (case
too, I think))
Ensuring correct IP bindings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 7:10 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: -ERR Invalid Syntax on PASS command (POP)
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> I believe that, at startup, if xmail does not find ALL the folders it
> requires,
nal time if I find
out what is going on simply for the sake of posterity!
Thanks,
Jeff
Rob Arends wrote:
> This will be a fault where the world uses you public IP to access your
zone
> hosted on your server, but when your server tries to resolve
> dns1.buehlertech.net it is not co
Harald / Davide,
I just read the smtpfwd link below and would expect that the next in the
list would be used at some time.
Except for the "#" random prefix, it does not state when the 2nd,3rd, etc
specified servers would be used.
One assumes that it would be upon failure of the first server.
If i
Yes you can,
But they will use different $MailRoots
I'm fairly sure the doco covers the topic; otherwise it has certainly been
covered on this list, so a google search will help.
Rob :-)
_
It might look like I'm doing nothing, but on a cellular l
I believe that, at startup, if xmail does not find ALL the folders it
requires, then it should do one of two things.
1. create the missing folders
Or
2. terminate after logging to the log_files/ screen/ event_log, depending on
platform and or debug mode.
Currently it.
3. continues without error
This will be a fault where the world uses you public IP to access your zone
hosted on your server, but when your server tries to resolve
dns1.buehlertech.net it is not contactable (probably because of NAT on a
firewall) and so tries dns2.buehlertech.net, but it is also not contactable.
Then it goes
s. Screwed up system TEMP folder is another one.
Like they said.
>
>
> -- Harald
>
>
>
> Rob Arends wrote:
> > Any thoughts on this one Davide?
> >
> > What does the "(-20)" error indicate?
> >
> > Rob :-)
> >
> &
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 1:26 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 451 Requested action aborted: (-20) local error in
processing
Hi Davide,
There are no entries in the event log.
The only evidence there was anything wrong was that the only ent
t on a cellular level, I'm quite
busy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 10:22 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 451 Requested action aborted: (-20) local error in
processin
ober 04, 2007 3:47 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 451 Requested action aborted: (-20) local error in
processing
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> I'm just trying to move an xmail setup to a win 2003 64bit server, and
have
> got 99% of th
Hi Davide,
I'm just trying to move an xmail setup to a win 2003 64bit server, and have
got 99% of the way.
However I find that I'm getting Blacklist (EIPMAP) errors in the smtp log,
but nothing else.
Investigations from another xmail server sending to the 64bit machine, I
get:
451 Requested a
Hi Tracy,
I've done [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But not specifically tested your [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would have to lab it; so I think you are left in the same boat.
Sorry.
Rob :-)
_
It might look like I'm doing nothing, but on a cellular level, I'm quite
Gut feel says there is a firewall (appliance?) that is forcing a limited set
of SMTP commands.
Like HELO, but not EHLO.
The Cisco PIX does this if you have 'fixup smtp' on.
Just turn it off. It will also allow authenticated SMTP too then.
If not a FW, then dunno!!
Rob :-)
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 12:50 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Testing your xmail server for SMTP SSL functionality.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
> Hack ?!?!?
>
> I did it once and got a result, then typed QUIT and left.
> Dunno how that is hacking.
&g
o put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 9:53 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Testing your xmail server for SMTP SSL functionality.
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007
I came across this little command, thought someone might find it useful
testing SSL on xmail:
openssl s_client -showcerts -starttls smtp -connect
x35.xmailserver.org:25
It uses openssl to 'telnet' to your smtp server and display a hole heap of
info about the SSL info it finds.
you w
Ana Paula, I see the same as David, sorry!
I'm running under W2K SP4 Xmail 1.25pre09.
ID:
Mail From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rcpt To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Server: [200.199.251.151]
[<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was:
550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: User unknown in local recipient
a problem. I would actually tackle it myself but just
don't have the in-depth knowledge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:36 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS
See
---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edmonds, J.B.
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 12:06 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS
Thanks, it appears I can relay but must logon, presenting a different
setup up problem. How to do this in xmail?=20
-Ori
AIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:44 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: XP Issue
READ THE MANUAL
Look for the "BUILD" section. Subsection "[Windows]"
Every Win install requires this library installed ever since xmail
supports
First thing to find out is if your ISP will allow you to relay for free.
Second thing is, if you use SPF records, then include your ISP outgoing IP
address(es) in your SPF record.
Then if at least #1, then relay via ISP.
Those MTAs that deny mail from dynamic IPs, must not deny from the MTAs of
th
The cause of not getting email from xmail-list after upgrade to 1.24 =
will be
that x35.xmailserver.org is attempting to negotiate TLS, when you do =
not
have TLS correctly configured - either fully off, or with correct
certificates.
Please search the archives to find the answers either way.
http
Davide, I've searched the archives & readmes, and can't seem to find the
field descriptions for the Glst 0.24 dump files.
I run
dbdump --dbfile glst.dbm --output glist.txt
dbdump --dbfile glst-lame.dbm --output glist-lame.txt
and then get (email addresses modified below)
LAME:
203.15.102.0\x
Davide, I have some domains I can play with if you like to do what you want.
What specific 'errors' do you want to create.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:51 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
> SO Getting back to the real issue at hand...
> Why would a VERY large ISP (optusnet.com.au) be b
___
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:43 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Tue, 17 Ap
ember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:49 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
> Dav
Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:53 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> > Davide,
> > I have had to turn on smartdnshost again.
> >
> > After having an e
__
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:45 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmai
READ THE MANUAL
Look for the "BUILD" section. Subsection "[Windows]"
Every Win install requires this library installed ever since xmail supports
SSL
Even if you do not use / want / configure SSL, you must install the library.
Just install it, then use the xmail binaries as you always have.
Rob
] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:13 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
> Also, using smartdnshost (local named process)
So basically you're still using 1.24 :)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe f
Also, using smartdnshost (local named process)
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Monday, April 16
Davide, running on Win2ksp4 here for 3 days - seems to be ok. (No SSL)
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Dale,
I use 7 minutes as I found 60 mins was too long, and that it works just
as well with 7 mins.
You could try less if you wanted.
Software without development just means no new features not
unsupported/dead.
There are some 'enhancements' that I'd like to propose for Davide's
implementatio
Hmm,
I think you could do that using a pre-data filter - providing the
was specified in the initial SMTP dialog.
I'm not sure if the SIZE value is mandatory.
You could also do it using a post-data filter - you would know the size of
the file on disk by then.
Rob :-)
___
What? - (re)create the symlink every day.
Talk about administrative overhead.!!
I suppose, I'm looking at most other open source applications, and I see a
single (dateless) logfile the is rotated by logwatch or similar and would
like to see similar option with xmail.
Sure I could run a cron job to
Davide,
I'm looking at methods of analysing/reporting the xmail logs better.
Really I'd like to get real-time into mysql.
One way is to use a named pipe and another is to just tail a file into
another process.
The tail method doesn't recover well from restarting the conversion process,
unless it
ter...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tracy
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:37 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Question about GLST
Rob Arends wrote:
> your spamtrap emails will be seen as individual addresses until the smtp
>
Tracy,
your spamtrap emails will be seen as individual addresses until the smtp
session is closed, then xmail puts them all in one mbox.
Glst will see them all - this will affect your db size - unless you are
bypassing glst on your spamtrap emails.
Rob :-)
Scott, you have guessed correctly 1.24 will allow you to send email from a
specific IP address.
I must admit - I looked at the Readme expecting to find the answer
plain-as-day
(searched for 'outbind' and got two hits), and not much explanation on how
to use it.
One hit is under 'POP3links.tab' &
Not having read your whole email (book!)
I read the first bit...
> use an SMTP server only - I don't need POP3 or anything else.
RTFM, here http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#command_line
And look for "Disable the service"
Rob :-)
_
Note To
Davide / Don,
I believe the third line:
>> SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/crt/yourdomainname.crt
>> SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/crt/private.key
>> SSLCACertificateFile /etc/ssl/crt/SERVERNAME.ca-bundle
...refers to a single file that is in-effect the same as the ./certs/ folder
supplied with
Dale and Scott,
I solved this by using xmail as the secondary mail server AND having a
nightly script that gathered the valid email address from the primary MTA
and created ./cmdalias/domain.com/.tab files with
"smtprelay"[tab]"mail.domain.com" inside.
Other than that xmail is set for no relay
Davide,
I was setting up an new xmail server for someone, when I got a ENODNS error
on my test email.
The error was due to a DNS timeout, because a resend of the test email
worked fine.
The error message (in part) that I got back was:
< mail.company.net.au #5.0.0 smtp; 505 Your domain has not
The base cause of this is a drop in communication b/n the MUA and the =
MTA.
(Could be a time out too).
Consider the MUA transactions in aPOP3 session.
(Pr=E9cis'd)
Connect.
Login.
Request list in mail headers with unique id.
Download mail.
Delete mail based on unique id.
Disconnect.
Now if the
Hi everyone,
The following oops was due to an older 'errors' table on the website.
(I think it was for 1.21)
> Ok, it's not ERR_SHMAT but ERR_NO_ROOT_DOMAIN_VAR. You're missing the
> "RootDomain" server.tab variable.
> I made a script to extract error codes, and that's the output ...
So I've up
> Ps: maybe I have to specify parameters at start ?
Yes you do.
The doc (readme.html) has the answers - look for "Command Line" - Note the
LOG switches are lowercase L.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
--
was that if you wanted this
feature to work you needed to follow the setup instructions.
Can the xMail application defaults be changed or can the defaults in the
server.tab be changed so that a standard install without SSL will work?
Thanks for the help, Hal...
-Original Message-
From: [
TO ANY ONE THAT IS MIGRATING TO 1.24
Please either:
1. configure the crypto keys according to the doco.
Or
2. add these lines to your server.tab
"SMTP-TLS"[tab]"0"[crlf]
"EnableCTRL-TLS"[tab]"0"[crlf]
"EnableSMTP-TLS"[tab]"0"[crlf]
"EnablePOP3-TLS"[tab]"0"[crlf]
You w
ome
compinsation for your time.
Do you have paypal?
On 1/22/07, Rob Arends <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Wasup, you are missing it altogether.
>
> Yes Xmail creates the filenames you listed (the names are a combination
> of:
> "seconds since 1/1/1970 00:00
Francis,
Sounds like yahoo is checking anti spam criteria and determining that you
are not worthy.
Perhaps the checks are asynchronous and so when the negative results come
in, the MTA abruptly and belatedly shuts the door.
I have had problems with hotmail some time ago. My fix was to use
smtpf
Francis, Sounds go on the surface.
But I think ETRN sends to the MX server, not the IP address requesting the
ETRN.
Is this correct?
If so, then the DNS would need to be updated before the ETRN issued.
Why not use the DYNDNS support in xmail on xmail(2).
Rob :-)
___
.
If the RC was 0, then xmail processes #16. If the RC was 16, then further
processing ceases.
This is how we get the forward to yahoo.com decision.
Are we clear so far?
START ---PLEASE USE THIS d:\xmail\xmail_filters\hi-pri.cmd ---
@echo off
REM Written by Rob Arends
REM
REM Script to return 16 to Xm
nd line parameters is via the above shown "%n"
variables.
So, your test.cmd should look like this:
@echo off
REM Written by Rob Arends
REM
REM Script to return 16 to Xmail if the email is NOT of high Importance.
setlocal
grep -Pqi "^X-Priority:\s*1\s" %1
set XPriHigh=%ERR
Wow, would you like some of the warmth here??
I'd really like some of the cold - but not all of it.
Yesterday it was 43C with overnight 25C
Today was 37C.
This is unusual in this neck of the woods (Coastal, South Eastern Australia
- Melbourne to be precise)
Usually over summer (Dec to March) we
put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Lord
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:03 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: gun for hire
On 15 Jan 2007, at 20:49, Rob Arends wrote:
> 4.
> What
127.0.0.1 (localhost) and use that IP
only in your smtp-server.tab
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Se
ok to allow only the mailserver ip? This way all script seem to
function again.
I also would like to change the mailserver's ip address from 213.160.217.191
to 213.160.217.171
Would this give any problems?
Erwin
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
Yes I had come to that conclusion - I am now testing @@USERAUTH="-" in a
wrapper.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of M
ide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 11:47 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> Davide, It's nice that you can confirm. !!??
>
> I'm confused with the meaning of your response.
> Le
Hmm, In that case, it would have been easier to remove the FLAG=VAL part of
the Doco, as so far not additional functionality was produced.
I suppose that the meaning of "aex" is "Auth user EXcluded". (true or false)
==> if true then don't run this filter.
Perhaps what I'm looking for is "auth",
uot;post-data" "EXCL" "-1" "-1" "D:\prog_for_auth_user.exe;"
I expected to see Message1 with the first log entry with an EXCL.
Thanks,
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter log info..
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> Davide,
> The doc does not offer wait-timeout for pre/post filters.
>
> 1. how do you control/set the timeout of a filter that is not an
> in/out filter.
> 2. What is the defau
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 9:04 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex
Ok, thanks, so I'll test with
"!aex=1"[tab]"prog" <- user is auth
witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:18 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter log info..
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Does an
later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:59 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> > Ok, for consi
___
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:46 AM
To: XMail mailing list
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Da
Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 7:49 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> Davide, let me first quote your documentation:
>
>
> "!flags"[TAB]"command"[TAB]"
nzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:14 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: macros available to various filters
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
> I just noticed that macros @@MSGID & @@MSGREF are available in in/out
> filters, but return nothing when used in a pos
Hi,
Does anyone know the layout of the logs.
I've seen http://www.henry.it/xmail/logs.html which tells me that column
7Filter Info
8Exec Result
9Exit Code
I'd like to know what might appear in Filter Info, mine always show "".
I see that Exit Code is "
Davide,
I just noticed that macros @@MSGID & @@MSGREF are available in in/out
filters, but return nothing when used in a post-data filter.
Also the values of @@REMOTEADDR & @@LOCALADDR return "[1.2.3.4]:25" for
in/out filters, but for post-data, it returns just the IP address, not even
the bracke
Davide, let me first quote your documentation:
"!flags"[TAB]"command"[TAB]"arg-or-macro"[TAB]...[NEWLINE]
Each file may contain multiple commands, that will be executed in strictly
sequential order. The first command that will trigger a rejection code will
make the filtering process to end. T
Just one note:
In the Filters.log relating to the @@FILE macro.
Now that you are logging the full command line to the log, I notice that
in/out filters seem to be getting \\?\D:\Mailroot\spool\etc
But post-rcpt/pre-data (and maybe post-data) are getting C:\WINNT\TEMP\etc
The issue is not the loc
Same here (w2ksp4) with filters (in/out/pre-data/post-rcpt)
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ana Paula Fernandes
Se
It's like this
Mailproc.tab is explained in the doco (readme.html) so please start there.
What OS are you running?
What language will the script be in?
There are so many questions you need to answer, but have not.
The script you are looking for does not exist. This means it will need to
be
member to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 5:40 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
>
alf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 13 November 2006 3:26 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> Davide, in the case where xmail emits an error - **other than**
> smail/smtp/filter/etc log files... =20 Where does Xmai
On
Behalf Of Filip Supera
Sent: Monday, 13 November 2006 10:13 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages
Rob Arends a écrit :
> Davide, in the case where xmail emits an error - **other than**
> smail/smtp/filter/etc log files...
> Where does Xmail write error
Davide, in the case where xmail emits an error - **other than**
smail/smtp/filter/etc log files...
Where does Xmail write errors like "file missing on return from filter"??
I know in sendmail this is written to the maillog. In debug mode it might
write to screen, but that information is lost i
Running pre 14, win2k sp4. with in/out/pre-data/post-rcpt filters; good so
far.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Da
Still on pre11, but I've been running with a post-rcpt glst filter for 24
hrs now without problem, in addition to the existing post/pre-data in/out
filters.
Running on W2k sp4.
I'll move to pre 12 now.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put som
Hmm, I had that under 1.23pre04. I then removed the port-rcpt filter and
upgraded to 1.23pre11
I'll have a look at adding the port-rcpt filter again and if it fails, then
look at the jit debugger.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put somethin
: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.23-pre11 ...
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Francesco Vertova wrote:
>
> At 13.20 08/11/06, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> >And found this in the readme:
> >
> >
> >MACRO SUBSTITUTION
> >XMail support two ki
Running on pre11 - see how we go. (Not using any new features yet)
(w2kSP4)
Davide, the last 1.23pre I installed was pre04, I had xmail terminate with
an error in the event viewer - something about Filters.
At the time I backed out and ran 1.22 as I didn't have time to investigate.
I had creat
1 - 100 of 448 matches
Mail list logo
