Messages by Date
-
2017/11/21
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Alex Balashov
-
2017/11/21
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Alex Balashov
-
2017/11/21
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Roman Shpount
-
2017/11/21
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Olle E. Johansson
-
2017/11/20
Re: [Sip-implementors] Changing <unicast-address> in "o=" field
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/11/20
[Sip-implementors] Changing <unicast-address> in "o=" field
wisniawy
-
2017/11/18
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Alex Balashov
-
2017/11/18
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Olle E. Johansson
-
2017/11/17
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Roman Shpount
-
2017/11/17
[Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Alex Balashov
-
2017/11/08
Re: [Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Aman
-
2017/11/08
Re: [Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Jonathan Lennox
-
2017/11/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Aman
-
2017/11/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Jonathan Lennox
-
2017/11/07
[Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Aman
-
2017/11/01
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/10/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Alex Balashov
-
2017/10/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/10/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Alex Balashov
-
2017/10/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/10/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Liviu Chircu
-
2017/10/30
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Alex Balashov
-
2017/10/30
[Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Alex Balashov
-
2017/10/30
Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY method for CNAM querying
Alex Balashov
-
2017/10/30
Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY method for CNAM querying
Alex Balashov
-
2017/10/30
Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY method for CNAM querying
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/10/29
[Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY method for CNAM querying
Alex Balashov
-
2017/10/26
Re: [Sip-implementors] EVS Codec
Srinivas Ch
-
2017/10/26
[Sip-implementors] Opensource voice engine to use in VoLTE client
DeejayD
-
2017/10/25
Re: [Sip-implementors] EVS Codec
Shadab Siddiqui
-
2017/10/25
[Sip-implementors] EVS Codec
Gaurav Khare
-
2017/10/10
Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/10/10
Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/10/10
Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Ivo Vastert
-
2017/10/10
Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/10/10
[Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Ivo Vastert
-
2017/10/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/10/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/10/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/10/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Abhishek Jain
-
2017/10/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/10/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/10/06
[Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs
VARUN BHATIA
-
2017/10/06
[Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Abhishek Jain
-
2017/10/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
Andrew Pogrebennyk
-
2017/10/04
Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/10/04
Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
M. Ranganathan
-
2017/10/04
Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/10/04
[Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
Andrew Pogrebennyk
-
2017/09/21
[Sip-implementors] R-URI INVITE with not UA IP@
Ruben Barriga
-
2017/09/19
Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 session
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/09/19
[Sip-implementors] 183 session
Verma, Salil (Nokia - IN/Noida)
-
2017/09/19
Re: [Sip-implementors] SBC sending 403 Forbidden when UE includes Anonymous in From header's user part
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/09/08
Re: [Sip-implementors] Should CANCEL request include the Route set from a reliable 18X
neil corcoran
-
2017/09/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] Should CANCEL request include the Route set from a reliable 18X
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/09/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] Should CANCEL request include the Route set from a reliable 18X
AnUBhav SriVaSTavA
-
2017/09/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] Offerless Re-INVITE
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/09/07
[Sip-implementors] Offerless Re-INVITE
Rakesh
-
2017/09/07
[Sip-implementors] Should CANCEL request include the Route set from a reliable 18X
neil corcoran
-
2017/09/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] Dividing the AS, RR and RS values from NW allocated DL_MBR
Ranganatha, Bharath (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
-
2017/09/05
Re: [Sip-implementors] Dividing the AS, RR and RS values from NW allocated DL_MBR
venkat ramana
-
2017/09/05
Re: [Sip-implementors] Dividing the AS, RR and RS values from NW allocated DL_MBR
Ranganatha, Bharath (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
-
2017/09/01
[Sip-implementors] Dividing the AS, RR and RS values from NW allocated DL_MBR
Arun Tagare
-
2017/08/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Payload Format
Asim Sulaiman
-
2017/08/31
[Sip-implementors] SDP Payload Format
bidhu biswal
-
2017/08/17
Re: [Sip-implementors] In-Dialogue
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/08/17
[Sip-implementors] In-Dialogue
Verma, Salil (Nokia - IN/Noida)
-
2017/08/08
Re: [Sip-implementors] No ACK for 200 OK
Puneet Kumar
-
2017/08/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] No ACK for 200 OK
Alex Balashov
-
2017/08/07
[Sip-implementors] No ACK for 200 OK
NK
-
2017/08/01
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/08/01
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Robert Sparks
-
2017/08/01
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/07/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Prakash K
-
2017/07/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/07/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Rohit
-
2017/07/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Prakash K
-
2017/07/31
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Asim Sulaiman
-
2017/07/31
[Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Prakash K
-
2017/07/19
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
-
2017/07/18
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/07/18
[Sip-implementors] How to insert the ephemeral port in Via header as source port
Rohit Jain
-
2017/07/18
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
-
2017/07/17
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/07/17
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
-
2017/07/17
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
-
2017/07/14
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/07/14
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/07/14
[Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
-
2017/07/10
Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv behavior
Shanbhag, Somesh (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
-
2017/07/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv behavior
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/07/07
[Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv behavior
Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
-
2017/07/07
[Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv behavior
Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
-
2017/07/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] Is it possible to fork early media?
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/07/05
Re: [Sip-implementors] Is it possible to fork early media?
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/07/05
Re: [Sip-implementors] Is it possible to fork early media?
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/07/05
[Sip-implementors] Is it possible to fork early media?
Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho
-
2017/07/04
[Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv
Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
-
2017/06/30
[Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv
Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
-
2017/06/29
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Brett Tate
-
2017/06/28
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/06/28
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/06/27
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
-
2017/06/27
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Parveen Aggarwal
-
2017/06/27
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
-
2017/06/27
[Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Parveen Aggarwal
-
2017/06/16
[Sip-implementors] indicating to send requests over TLS
Brett Tate
-
2017/06/16
[Sip-implementors] SIP ALG detector
Matt Rea
-
2017/06/15
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
-
2017/06/14
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Jan Bollen
-
2017/06/14
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
-
2017/06/14
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
-
2017/06/13
[Sip-implementors] AYUSH - Ayurveda, Yoga, Homeopathy and More invite by Directorate Of AYUSH
Directorate Of AYUSH
-
2017/06/09
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Bye before 200 OK for Initial Invite
NK
-
2017/06/09
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Bye before 200 OK for Initial Invite
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/06/09
[Sip-implementors] SIP Bye before 200 OK for Initial Invite
NK
-
2017/06/09
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Jan Bollen
-
2017/06/09
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
sampat patnaik
-
2017/06/09
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
-
2017/06/08
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Jan Bollen
-
2017/06/08
[Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
-
2017/05/26
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/05/26
[Sip-implementors] (no subject)
Martin Wang
-
2017/05/26
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Dinoop
-
2017/05/26
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/05/26
[Sip-implementors] Message Body in SIP ACK is NOT SDP
amrita chaudhary
-
2017/05/26
Re: [Sip-implementors] answer RTP/AVPF to offer RTP/AVP
Brett Tate
-
2017/05/25
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/05/25
[Sip-implementors] answer RTP/AVPF to offer RTP/AVP
Brett Tate
-
2017/05/24
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/05/24
[Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Dinoop
-
2017/05/24
Re: [Sip-implementors] Early Media and 200 OK with SDP
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/05/24
Re: [Sip-implementors] Early Media and 200 OK with SDP
Anjan Naik
-
2017/05/24
Re: [Sip-implementors] Early Media and 200 OK with SDP
Anand Konji
-
2017/05/24
[Sip-implementors] Early Media and 200 OK with SDP
Anjan Naik
-
2017/05/24
Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Ramesh Kuppili
-
2017/05/23
Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/05/23
Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/05/23
Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Shanbhag, Somesh (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
-
2017/05/22
[Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Ramesh Kuppili
-
2017/04/28
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Aman
-
2017/04/26
Re: [Sip-implementors] Receiving 481 Call Leg Transaction does not exists for INVITE with Reliable Provisioning
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/04/18
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
-
2017/04/12
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Adam Frankel
-
2017/04/12
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/04/12
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Brett Tate
-
2017/04/11
[Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Adam Frankel
-
2017/04/04
Re: [Sip-implementors] race_condition
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/04/04
Re: [Sip-implementors] race_condition
Brett Tate
-
2017/04/04
[Sip-implementors] race_condition
Verma, Salil (Nokia - IN/Noida)
-
2017/03/17
[Sip-implementors] Receiving 481 Call Leg Transaction does not exists for INVITE with Reliable Provisioning
Harshith Mulky
-
2017/03/10
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/03/10
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/03/10
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Brett Tate
-
2017/03/10
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Brett Tate
-
2017/03/10
[Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Puneet Kumar
-
2017/02/27
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/02/27
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding
Brett Tate
-
2017/02/26
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding
Alok Tiwari
-
2017/02/26
[Sip-implementors] Query regarding
Rohit Jain
-
2017/02/08
Re: [Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
Brett Tate
-
2017/02/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
dheeraj kumar
-
2017/02/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
dheeraj kumar
-
2017/02/01
Re: [Sip-implementors] X-Forwarded-For for sip traffic
Brett Tate
-
2017/02/01
[Sip-implementors] X-Forwarded-For for sip traffic
Maxim Sobolev
-
2017/01/30
Re: [Sip-implementors] Re-INVITE without SDP - Held Both
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/01/30
[Sip-implementors] Re-INVITE without SDP - Held Both
Bharath Reddy Mallepalli
-
2017/01/27
Re: [Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
Brett Tate
-
2017/01/27
[Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
Rakesh
-
2017/01/23
[Sip-implementors] RFC 7463: Contact within PUBLISH
Brett Tate
-
2017/01/20
Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 7463: PUBLISH with To tag question
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/01/19
Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 7463: PUBLISH with To tag question
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/01/19
[Sip-implementors] RFC 7463: PUBLISH with To tag question
Brett Tate
-
2017/01/07
Re: [Sip-implementors] Routing logic at network when multiple clients co-exist on same device
Senthil.Pandian
-
2017/01/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/01/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/01/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Rakesh
-
2017/01/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/01/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Rakesh
-
2017/01/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Brett Tate
-
2017/01/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Rakesh
-
2017/01/06
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Mohit Soni
-
2017/01/06
[Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Rakesh
-
2017/01/05
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Request URI Domain processing without Port
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/01/04
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Request URI Domain processing without Port
Mohit Soni
-
2017/01/04
[Sip-implementors] SIP Request URI Domain processing without Port
Varadhan Work
-
2017/01/04
Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK and RFC Compliant to RFC 2543
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/01/04
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/01/04
Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK and Proxy Servers Compliant to RFC 2543
Brett Tate
-
2017/01/04
[Sip-implementors] PRACK and Proxy Servers Compliant to RFC 2543
Vimal Tewari
-
2017/01/04
[Sip-implementors] PRACK and RFC Compliant to RFC 2543
Vimal Tewari
-
2017/01/03
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Dale R. Worley
-
2017/01/03
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
kamini gangwani
-
2017/01/03
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Brett Tate
-
2017/01/03
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Paul Kyzivat
-
2017/01/03
[Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Varadhan Work
-
2017/01/02
[Sip-implementors] Routing logic at network when multiple clients co-exist on same device
Senthil.Pandian
-
2016/12/21
Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding UAC behaviour for ACK with proxy-authentication
Tarun Gupta
-
2016/12/20
Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding UAC behaviour for ACK with proxy-authentication
sairam pokkunuri
-
2016/12/19
Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding UAC behaviour for ACK with proxy-authentication
Tarun Gupta