Hi, all, Just jumping back into this thread with a link to a diary post about the Comms Survey and the Comms project in general.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/courtiney/diary/401468 As I mentioned before, we are presenting at SotM US on the 9th and will post a follow-up to that sometime shortly after. Over in the community forum, Arnalie Vicario mentioned two possible next actions: 1) documenting survey best practices and 2) having BoF discussion about this in Richmond; I like both ideas, particularly if the data can guide us in the approach. There is a lot that can be done and maybe we could work asynchronously and together at SotM EU, Asia and Africa. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/survey-about-osm-communication-behaviors/98460/15 --Courtney On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 6:36 PM Courtney <courtney.william...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just to tie up a few of the loose ends. > > Nothing that anyone has said has been dismissed or downgraded as merely > "pushback." This has all been very instructive for me and I've learned a > lot. > > In the first post, Marjan described the companies and roles of the folks > to whom I'm referring to as my "team." > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-April/088217.html > > These three folks are former colleagues since I used to work at TomTom. > Now, I am a strategic communications consultant and a writer. I still > volunteer for the CWG, and I'm also consulting a bit with the OSMF on its > fundraising. Even though I'm not with TomTom anymore, I am still > interested in the communications data project, so I have continued to work > on it as a volunteer. We are presenting at SotMUS in June. We are in the > 4:30pm slot on Friday. https://2023.stateofthemap.us/schedule/ > > I don't see any way to have avoided saying that Marjan and I volunteer for > the CWG because it's relevant to the study. Being on the CWG helped us > understand more about how OSM communicates and gave us the idea to study > the channel and forum data. It also gives me a way to volunteer within the > community since I'm not a GIS expert or software engineer. > > I think this covers everything? If not, let me know. > > Don't forget to take the survey! > https://osmf.limequery.org/875881?lang=en (There is a bit more about the > project in the introduction) > > > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 4:27 PM John Whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Courtney wrote on 5/3/2023 4:00 PM: >> Compare a statement like this: >> >> "I know you may be relatively new here, so to help you be successful, >> here are some ideas for how to structure for your project" >> >> to a statement like this: >> >> "I am disappointed to yet again see someone doing this wrong and >> ignoring the requests of the community" >> >> >> There is a difference in the level of language proficiency needed to use >> the first sentence so you're asking a great deal of people using a second >> language to use that level of proficiency. >> This might be appropriate for easing people into a new situation but I >> think you also have to take into account that technical people and there >> are many here usually are more direct , blunt if you like. >> >> How would you rephrase Fredrick's post by the way? I may have missed >> your answer. >> >> Can you clarify who "your team" in this context is? You were introduced >> in Marjan's initial post as "OSMF Communication Working Group Member" and >> were the only of four names without a TomTom affiliation. You are posting >> this neither from an OSMF nor from a TomTom address but from a gmail one. >> >> Is "your team" a corporate TomTom endeavour? Is it the OSMF >> Communications working group? Or...? >> >> Unclear affiliations are a problem, as I pointed out in this thread a few >> days ago. Has everything I said been filed away under "pushback" and >> ignored? >> >> Many Thanks >> >> Cheerio John >> -- >> Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com> >> > > > -- > > --Courtney Cook Williamson > survivalbybook.substack.com >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk