dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Steve Lawrence
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps John Wass
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Mike Beckerle
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Steve Lawrence
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps John Wass
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Mike Beckerle
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Adam Rosien
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps John Wass
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Mike Beckerle
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps John Wass
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Steve Lawrence
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Mike Beckerle
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps John Wass
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Steve Lawrence
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Mike Beckerle
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Adam Rosien
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Steve Lawrence
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps John Wass
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps John Wass
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Steve Lawrence
  • Re: vscode debugger - next steps Mike Beckerle
• Fwd: [IP-CLEARANCE] Apache Daffodil VSCode Debugger - Vote Mike Beckerle
• 2nd reviewer needed on PR Mike Beckerle
• apache email issues with Microsoft email Mike Beckerle
• Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Mike Beckerle
  • Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Mike Beckerle
  • Please review PR for - Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Mike Beckerle
  • Re: Please review PR for - Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Please review PR for - Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Mike Beckerle
  • Re: Please review PR for - Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Please review PR for - Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Mike Beckerle
  • Re: Please review PR for - Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Please review PR for - Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Mike Beckerle
  • RE: Please review PR for - Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Larry Barber
  • Re: Please review PR for - Re: Design discussion - dynamically loadable layers - DAFFODIL-1927 Mike Beckerle
• Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" Beckerle, Mike
• github issues vs. JIRA for VSCode Debugger - Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: github issues vs. JIRA for VSCode Debugger - Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" Steve Lawrence
  • Re: github issues vs. JIRA for VSCode Debugger - Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" John Wass
  • Re: github issues vs. JIRA for VSCode Debugger - Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" Adam Rosien
  • RE: github issues vs. JIRA for VSCode Debugger - Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: github issues vs. JIRA for VSCode Debugger - Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" Mike Beckerle
  • Re: github issues vs. JIRA for VSCode Debugger - Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: github issues vs. JIRA for VSCode Debugger - Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" Steve Lawrence
  • Re: github issues vs. JIRA for VSCode Debugger - Fw: Apache JIRA vs. github "issues" Mike Beckerle
• FYI: Apache emails blocked by Microsoft email spam filters Beckerle, Mike
• Try Java 17 LTS Beckerle, Mike
• verify licenses on dependencies for vscode debugger Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: verify licenses on dependencies for vscode debugger Adam Rosien
  • Re: verify licenses on dependencies for vscode debugger Adam Rosien
  • Re: verify licenses on dependencies for vscode debugger Steve Lawrence
  • Re: verify licenses on dependencies for vscode debugger John Wass
  • Re: verify licenses on dependencies for vscode debugger Steve Lawrence
• daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Steve Lawrence
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Adam Rosien
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Adam Rosien
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Steve Lawrence
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions John Wass
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Steve Lawrence
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions John Wass
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Steve Lawrence
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Adam Rosien
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Steve Lawrence
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions John Wass
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Steve Lawrence
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions John Wass
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions John Wass
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions John Wass
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Steve Lawrence
• Main development branch name change? Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Main development branch name change? Sood, Harinder
  • RE: Main development branch name change? Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: Main development branch name change? Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Main development branch name change? Dave Fisher
  • Enable CLC Scans? (was "Main development branch name change?") Steve Lawrence
  • Main development branch name change? Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: Main development branch name change? Steve Lawrence
  • Main development branch name change? Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
• Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem Attila Horvath
  • Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem Attila Horvath
  • Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem Mike Beckerle
• Please review mock up idea for checksum calculations in DFDL Beckerle, Mike
  • Please review: DFDL parity calculations also - was: Fw: Please review mock up idea for checksum calculations in DFDL Beckerle, Mike
  • RE: Please review: DFDL parity calculations also - was: Fw: Please review mock up idea for checksum calculations in DFDL Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: Please review mock up idea for checksum calculations in DFDL Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Please review mock up idea for checksum calculations in DFDL Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Please review mock up idea for checksum calculations in DFDL Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Please review mock up idea for checksum calculations in DFDL Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Please review mock up idea for checksum calculations in DFDL Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Please review mock up idea for checksum calculations in DFDL Steve Lawrence
• trying to rerun checks on PR - no option for it? Beckerle, Mike
  • RE: trying to rerun checks on PR - no option for it? Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: trying to rerun checks on PR - no option for it? Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: trying to rerun checks on PR - no option for it? Steve Lawrence
  • Re: trying to rerun checks on PR - no option for it? Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: trying to rerun checks on PR - no option for it? Steve Lawrence
• daffodil issue reported Attila Horvath
  • Re: daffodil issue reported Steve Lawrence
  • Re: daffodil issue reported Attila Horvath
  • Re: daffodil issue reported Attila Horvath
• DFDL Getting started Anil Khiani
  • Re: DFDL Getting started Steve Lawrence
• How to list offset and length of DFDL elements within native data? Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: How to list offset and length of DFDL elements within native data? Beckerle, Mike
• Java 9's Modules System - not a help for dependency isolation problem Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Java 9's Modules System - not a help for dependency isolation problem Adam Rosien
  • Re: Java 9's Modules System - not a help for dependency isolation problem Christofer Dutz
  • Re: Java 9's Modules System - not a help for dependency isolation problem Christofer Dutz
  • Re: Java 9's Modules System - not a help for dependency isolation problem Christofer Dutz
• Squash last commit and newest commit Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • RE: Squash last commit and newest commit Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • RE: Squash last commit and newest commit Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
• Jira contributor access Aung, Min Phyo
  • Re: Jira contributor access Steve Lawrence
• So many automated PRs... do we need to count them separately? Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: So many automated PRs... do we need to count them separately? Steve Lawrence
  • Re: So many automated PRs... do we need to count them separately? Beckerle, Mike
• test cases - examples Attila Horvath
  • Re: test cases - examples Beckerle, Mike
• transformation example Beckerle, Mike
• SonarCloud Code Smell Reduction? Helge Pfeiffer
  • RE: SonarCloud Code Smell Reduction? Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: SonarCloud Code Smell Reduction? Kilo, Olabusayo
  • Re: SonarCloud Code Smell Reduction? Helge Pfeiffer
• VSCode License - we're good Beckerle, Mike
• Use GitHub Releases John Wass
  • Re: Use GitHub Releases John Wass
  • Re: Use GitHub Releases Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Use GitHub Releases John Wass
  • Re: Use GitHub Releases Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Use GitHub Releases John Wass
• XML Catalogs feature - should we deprecate it Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: XML Catalogs feature - should we deprecate it Steve Lawrence
• broke master 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT branch with latest commit Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: broke master 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT branch with latest commit Beckerle, Mike
• DAFFODIL-1927 Sandeep Kumar
  • Re: DAFFODIL-1927 Beckerle, Mike
• ICU library version - was: IBM DFDL is upgrading ICU level Beckerle, Mike
  • RE: ICU library version - was: IBM DFDL is upgrading ICU level Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Daffodil 3.1.0 Released Steve Lawrence
• Re: [GitHub] [daffodil] stevedlawrence commented on pull request #567: Update scala-library, scala-reflect to 2.13.6 Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: [GitHub] [daffodil] stevedlawrence commented on pull request #567: Update scala-library, scala-reflect to 2.13.6 Steve Lawrence
• 224 legacy Resolved Daffodil JIRA tickets Thompson, Dave
  • RE: 224 legacy Resolved Daffodil JIRA tickets Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • RE: 224 legacy Resolved Daffodil JIRA tickets Sood, Harinder
  • Re: 224 legacy Resolved Daffodil JIRA tickets Steve Lawrence
• [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Steve Lawrence
• Windows debug clues needed Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Windows debug clues needed Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Windows debug clues needed Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Windows debug clues needed Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Windows debug clues needed Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Windows debug clues needed Beckerle, Mike
• [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Steve Lawrence
  • RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Steve Lawrence
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Adams, Joshua
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 John Wass
  • [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Steve Lawrence
  • RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Thompson, Dave
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Olabusayo Kilo
• [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 Steve Lawrence
  • RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 Steve Lawrence
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 Adams, Joshua
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1 Steve Lawrence
• sbt testOnly command line for running exactly one integration test? Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: sbt testOnly command line for running exactly one integration test? Steve Lawrence
• [GitHub] [daffodil-vscode] stevedlawrence opened a new pull request #1: Add LICENSE/NOTICE/asf.yml files GitBox
  • [GitHub] [daffodil-vscode] tuxji commented on a change in pull request #1: Add LICENSE/NOTICE/asf.yml files GitBox
  • [GitHub] [daffodil-vscode] stevedlawrence commented on a change in pull request #1: Add LICENSE/NOTICE/asf.yml files GitBox
  • [GitHub] [daffodil-vscode] stevedlawrence merged pull request #1: Add LICENSE/NOTICE/asf.yml files GitBox
• Daffodil DAP debugger modules and repos Adam Rosien
  • Re: Daffodil DAP debugger modules and repos Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Daffodil DAP debugger modules and repos Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Daffodil DAP debugger modules and repos Adam Rosien
  • Re: Daffodil DAP debugger modules and repos Steve Lawrence
  • Re: Daffodil DAP debugger modules and repos Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: Daffodil DAP debugger modules and repos Adam Rosien
  • Re: Daffodil DAP debugger modules and repos Steve Lawrence
• draft may board report - due on 12th. Beckerle, Mike
  • RE: draft may board report - due on 12th. Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)
  • release 3.1.0 critical bugs still outstanding Beckerle, Mike
  • Re: release 3.1.0 critical bugs still outstanding Steve Lawrence
  • Re: release 3.1.0 critical bugs still outstanding Beckerle, Mike
  • RE: release 3.1.0 critical bugs still outstanding Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)

• Earlier messages
• Later messages