r6rs-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Derick Eddington
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Alan Watson
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments David Van Horn
  • [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? Carl Eastlund
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? Jon Wilson
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? Keith Wright
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Jon Wilson
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Elf
  • [r6rs-discuss] +/- nan/inf .0 Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] +/- nan/inf .0 John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] +/- nan/inf .0 Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Elf
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Elf
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Elf
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Jon Wilson
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Keith Wright
  • [r6rs-discuss] some questions lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Jon Wilson
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Jon Wilson
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? Jon Wilson
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Complex <? Ken Dickey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Bradley Lucier
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Jed Davis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Jens Axel Soegaard
  • [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Alan Bawden
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Alan Bawden
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Alan Bawden
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Isaac Morland
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Isaac Morland
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments Isaac Morland
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] Scheme workshop survey Marc Feeley
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Scheme workshop survey Mitchell Wand
• [r6rs-discuss] New Steering Committee Aaron W. Hsu
• [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Scheme Language Steering Committee election: preliminary announcement Mitchell Wand
• [r6rs-discuss] ANN: Call for registration: 2008 Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] incorrect result in example for expt William D Clinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] incorrect result in example for expt Chongkai Zhu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] incorrect result in example for expt Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] incorrect result in example for expt Chongkai Zhu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] incorrect result in example for expt Elf
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] incorrect result in example for expt Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] Where is the type predicate for enumerations? Göran Weinholt
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Where is the type predicate for enumerations? Abdulaziz Ghuloum
• [r6rs-discuss] What about list of R6RS compatible implementations? Stanislav Ievlev
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] What about list of R6RS compatible implementations? leppie
• [r6rs-discuss] Behaviour of lookahead-u8 and lookahead-char on custom ports leppie
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Behaviour of lookahead-u8 and lookahead-char on custom ports William D Clinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Behaviour of lookahead-u8 and lookahead-char on custom ports leppie
• [r6rs-discuss] Be smarter, get your medicaments online. , [email protected] VIAGRA � Trusted Shop
• [r6rs-discuss] interpretation of file options William D Clinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] interpretation of file options Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] interpretation of file options William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] overcomplicated numeric syntax. Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] overcomplicated numeric syntax. John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] overcomplicated numeric syntax. Abdulaziz Ghuloum
• [r6rs-discuss] bitwise-rotate-bit-field count Per Bothner
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Validity of nan.0 and inf.0 using a radix other than 10. William D Clinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Validity of nan.0 and inf.0 using a radix other than 10. William D Clinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Validity of nan.0 and inf.0 using a radix other than 10. Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Validity of nan.0 and inf.0 using a radix other than 10. leppie
• [r6rs-discuss] Validity of nan.0 and inf.0 using a radix other than 10. leppie
  • [r6rs-discuss] Validity of nan.0 and inf.0 using a radix other than 10. leppie
• [r6rs-discuss] bitwise-copy-bit-field Per Bothner
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] bitwise-copy-bit-field Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] bitwise-copy-bit-field Per Bothner
• [r6rs-discuss] bitwise-copy-bit Per Bothner
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] bitwise-copy-bit Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] guard re-raising and continuable exceptions Derick Eddington
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] guard re-raising and continuable exceptions Derick Eddington
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] guard re-raising and continuable exceptions Derick Eddington
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] guard re-raising and continuable exceptions Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] guard re-raising and continuable exceptions Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] @ should be a valid identifier Derick Eddington
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] @ should be a valid identifier John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] @ should be a valid identifier Derick Eddington
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] @ should be a valid identifier John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] @ should be a valid identifier Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] @ should be a valid identifier John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] @ should be a valid identifier Shiro Kawai
• [r6rs-discuss] No way to set current-output-port to a non-file port? Ryan Newton
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] No way to set current-output-port to a non-file port? Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] No way to set current-output-port to a non-file port? Ryan Newton
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] No way to set current-output-port to a non-file port? Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] Was exporting records ever discussed? Ryan Newton
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Was exporting records ever discussed? Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Was exporting records ever discussed? Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Was exporting records ever discussed? John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Was exporting records ever discussed? Ryan Newton
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Was exporting records ever discussed? R. Kent Dybvig
• [r6rs-discuss] Typos Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos R. Kent Dybvig
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typos Llewellyn Pritchard
• [r6rs-discuss] Error in imag-part example? Llewellyn Pritchard
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Error in imag-part example? Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] SRFI 97: SRFI Libraries David Van Horn
• [r6rs-discuss] Morphology of symbols: are you sure? Henrik Theiling
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Morphology of symbols: are you sure? John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] gcd & lcm argument requirements Llewellyn Pritchard
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] gcd & lcm argument requirements Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] gcd & lcm argument requirements Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] gcd & lcm argument requirements Abdulaziz Ghuloum
• [r6rs-discuss] fixnum->flonum but no flonum->fixnum? Bradley Lucier
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] fixnum->flonum but no flonum->fixnum? John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] fixnum->flonum but no flonum->fixnum? Bradley Lucier
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] fixnum->flonum but no flonum->fixnum? Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] fixnum->flonum but no flonum->fixnum? Bradley Lucier
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] fixnum->flonum but no flonum->fixnum? Abdulaziz Ghuloum
• [r6rs-discuss] Is this pattern matching behavior allowed by R6RS or not? Derick Eddington
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Is this pattern matching behavior allowed by R6RS or not? R. Kent Dybvig
  • [r6rs-discuss] Improper lists (pattern matching) Keith Wright
• [r6rs-discuss] ANN: Ikarus 0.0.3 released Abdulaziz Ghuloum
• [r6rs-discuss] Typo in R6RS zick
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typo in R6RS Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] Errata list online Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 1.2 of r6rs-lib? Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 1.2 of r6rs-lib? Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 1.2 of r6rs-lib? Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 1.2 of r6rs-lib? Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 1.2 of r6rs-lib? John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 1.2 of r6rs-lib? Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 1.2 of r6rs-lib? Alan Watson
• [r6rs-discuss] ANN: Larceny v0.96 "Fluoridation" William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] Case Folding Alan Watson
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Case Folding Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] environment examples incorrect Llewellyn Pritchard
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] environment examples incorrect Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] environment examples incorrect Llewellyn Pritchard
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] environment examples incorrect Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] environment examples incorrect Llewellyn Pritchard
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] environment examples incorrect Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] enum-set-subset? not clear Llewellyn Pritchard
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] enum-set-subset? not clear Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] enum-set-subset? not clear Llewellyn Pritchard
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] enum-set-subset? not clear Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] enum-set-subset? not clear Llewellyn Pritchard
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] enum-set-subset? not clear Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] enum-set-subset? not clear Llewellyn Pritchard
• [r6rs-discuss] BOM at start of ports Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] BOM at start of ports John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] BOM at start of ports William D Clinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] BOM at start of ports William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] Incorrect sample code for vector-sort! Llewellyn Pritchard
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Incorrect sample code for vector-sort! Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] -nan.0 Alan Watson
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] ANN: R6RS benchmarks Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] ANN: R6RS benchmarks William D Clinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] ANN: R6RS benchmarks Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] ANN: R6RS benchmarks Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] ANN: R6RS benchmarks Michael Sperber
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] ANN: R6RS benchmarks Abdulaziz Ghuloum

• Later messages