subject:"\"RE\\\: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources\\\?\""

RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-08-01 Thread Jesse Noller


If you feel that there is a problem, then follow the link I sent out, submit the FULL 
CODE for a reproducible problem into the bug report.



Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development
Unix/Linux "special guy" 

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:48 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> 
> This is great.. but its still not close to CF 5.0 "740ms" which was posted
> on here yesterday.
> 
> Jesse/Sean
> Are you guys convinced that there is a performance issue with Wddx
> on CFMX?
> If so as Jesse suggested.. can you open a Problem ticket with MM
> on
> this issue
> or give us some guidence on what do?
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:52 AM
> Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> 
> 
> > On another machine we tried the same tests and found the code took
> > 1680ms to run 1000 iterations. Interestingly enough we rewrote Sean's
> > code in Java and retried the tests. From Java we could do 1000
> > iterations in 1265ms. The Java code is below.
> >
> > import java.util.*;
> > import java.io.*;
> > import org.xml.sax.*;
> > import com.allaire.wddx.*;
> >
> > public class STest
> > {
> >   String xmlContent = null;
> >   WddxDeserializer deserializer = null;
> >
> >   public STest(String filePath) throws Exception
> >   {
> > deserializer = new
> > WddxDeserializer("org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser");
> > readInXML(filePath);
> >   }
> >
> >   public static void main(String args[])
> >   {
> > try
> > {
> >   if (args.length < 2)
> >   {
> > System.out.println("Usage: alchemy.STest filepath
> > deserializations [iterations]");
> > return;
> >   }
> >   int iterations = 1;
> >   if (args.length == 3)
> > iterations = Integer.parseInt(args[2]);
> >   STest test = new STest(args[0]);
> >   for (int i=0; i >   {
> > test.run(Integer.parseInt(args[1]));
> >   }
> > }
> > catch (Exception ex)
> > {
> >   ex.printStackTrace();
> > }
> >   }
> >
> >   private void readInXML(String filePath) throws Exception
> >   {
> > FileReader reader = null;
> > try
> > {
> >   reader = new FileReader(filePath);
> >   xmlContent = "";
> >   char[] buf = new char[512];
> >   int read = -1;
> >   while ((read = reader.read(buf)) != -1)
> >   {
> > xmlContent += new String(buf, 0, read);
> >   }
> >   xmlContent = xmlContent.trim();
> > }
> > finally
> > {
> >   if (reader != null)
> > reader.close();
> > }
> >   }
> >
> > public void run(int nTimes) throws Exception
> > {
> > Map map = null;
> > InputSource source = null;
> >
> > long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
> > for (int i=0; inTimes; i++)
> > {
> >   source = new InputSource(new StringReader(xmlContent));
> >   map = (Map)deserializer.deserialize(source);
> > }
> > long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
> > System.out.println("It took: " + (end - start) + " ms to deserialize
> > " + nTimes + " times.");
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> > Matt Liotta
> > President & CEO
> > Montara Software, Inc.
> > http://www.montarasoftware.com/
> > V: 415-577-8070
> > F: 415-341-8906
> > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:22 AM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> > >
> > > P3 866 384 RAM CFMX (2543ms)
> > >
> > > Using the below code on the same machine (5908ms)
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > tempDoc = XmlParse(temp);
> > > ctemp = StructNew();
> > >
> > > for(itr = 1; itr lte
> > > ArrayLen(tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.XmlChildren); itr = itr + 1)
> > >

Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-08-01 Thread Joe Eugene


This is great.. but its still not close to CF 5.0 "740ms" which was posted
on here yesterday.

Jesse/Sean
Are you guys convinced that there is a performance issue with Wddx
on CFMX?
If so as Jesse suggested.. can you open a Problem ticket with MM on
this issue
or give us some guidence on what do?

Joe


- Original Message -
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:52 AM
Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)


> On another machine we tried the same tests and found the code took
> 1680ms to run 1000 iterations. Interestingly enough we rewrote Sean's
> code in Java and retried the tests. From Java we could do 1000
> iterations in 1265ms. The Java code is below.
>
> import java.util.*;
> import java.io.*;
> import org.xml.sax.*;
> import com.allaire.wddx.*;
>
> public class STest
> {
>   String xmlContent = null;
>   WddxDeserializer deserializer = null;
>
>   public STest(String filePath) throws Exception
>   {
> deserializer = new
> WddxDeserializer("org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser");
> readInXML(filePath);
>   }
>
>   public static void main(String args[])
>   {
> try
> {
>   if (args.length < 2)
>   {
> System.out.println("Usage: alchemy.STest filepath
> deserializations [iterations]");
> return;
>   }
>   int iterations = 1;
>   if (args.length == 3)
> iterations = Integer.parseInt(args[2]);
>   STest test = new STest(args[0]);
>   for (int i=0; i   {
> test.run(Integer.parseInt(args[1]));
>   }
> }
> catch (Exception ex)
> {
>   ex.printStackTrace();
> }
>   }
>
>   private void readInXML(String filePath) throws Exception
>   {
> FileReader reader = null;
> try
> {
>   reader = new FileReader(filePath);
>   xmlContent = "";
>   char[] buf = new char[512];
>   int read = -1;
>   while ((read = reader.read(buf)) != -1)
>   {
> xmlContent += new String(buf, 0, read);
>   }
>   xmlContent = xmlContent.trim();
> }
> finally
> {
>   if (reader != null)
> reader.close();
> }
>   }
>
> public void run(int nTimes) throws Exception
> {
> Map map = null;
> InputSource source = null;
>
> long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
> for (int i=0; inTimes; i++)
> {
>   source = new InputSource(new StringReader(xmlContent));
>   map = (Map)deserializer.deserialize(source);
> }
> long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
> System.out.println("It took: " + (end - start) + " ms to deserialize
> " + nTimes + " times.");
> }
>
> }
>
> Matt Liotta
> President & CEO
> Montara Software, Inc.
> http://www.montarasoftware.com/
> V: 415-577-8070
> F: 415-341-8906
> P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:22 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> >
> > P3 866 384 RAM CFMX (2543ms)
> >
> > Using the below code on the same machine (5908ms)
> >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > tempDoc = XmlParse(temp);
> > ctemp = StructNew();
> >
> > for(itr = 1; itr lte
> > ArrayLen(tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.XmlChildren); itr = itr + 1)
> > StructInsert(ctemp,
> > tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.var[itr].XmlAttributes.name,
> > tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.var[itr].XmlChildren[1].XmlText);
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > #GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms
> > 
> > 
> >
> > Matt Liotta
> > President & CEO
> > Montara Software, Inc.
> > http://www.montarasoftware.com/
> > V: 415-577-8070
> > F: 415-341-8906
> > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:11 AM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:27 , Joe Eugene wrote:
> > > > Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
> > >
> > > I've put together a very simple test to time wddx2cfml on various
> > systems.
> > >   I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here will
> b

RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Matt Liotta


On another machine we tried the same tests and found the code took
1680ms to run 1000 iterations. Interestingly enough we rewrote Sean's
code in Java and retried the tests. From Java we could do 1000
iterations in 1265ms. The Java code is below.

import java.util.*;
import java.io.*;
import org.xml.sax.*;
import com.allaire.wddx.*;

public class STest
{
  String xmlContent = null;
  WddxDeserializer deserializer = null;
  
  public STest(String filePath) throws Exception
  {
deserializer = new
WddxDeserializer("org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser");
readInXML(filePath);
  }

  public static void main(String args[])
  {
try
{
  if (args.length < 2)
  {
System.out.println("Usage: alchemy.STest filepath
deserializations [iterations]");
return; 
  }
  int iterations = 1;
  if (args.length == 3)
iterations = Integer.parseInt(args[2]);
  STest test = new STest(args[0]);
  for (int i=0; ihttp://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:22 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> 
> P3 866 384 RAM CFMX (2543ms)
> 
> Using the below code on the same machine (5908ms)
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>   
>   tempDoc = XmlParse(temp);
>   ctemp = StructNew();
> 
>   for(itr = 1; itr lte
> ArrayLen(tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.XmlChildren); itr = itr + 1)
>   StructInsert(ctemp,
> tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.var[itr].XmlAttributes.name,
> tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.var[itr].XmlChildren[1].XmlText);
>   
> 
> 
> #GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms
> 
> 
> 
> Matt Liotta
> President & CEO
> Montara Software, Inc.
> http://www.montarasoftware.com/
> V: 415-577-8070
> F: 415-341-8906
> P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:11 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> >
> > On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:27 , Joe Eugene wrote:
> > >   Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
> >
> > I've put together a very simple test to time wddx2cfml on various
> systems.
> >   I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here will
be
> able
> > to confirm / deny the speed differences.
> >
> > Two files:
> > - xfile.cfm reads the WDDX packet and then times cfwddx repeatedly
> > deserializing it
> > - joe.wddx is Joe's WDDX (with a correction: there's a missing
> 
> > on line 34!)
> >
> > I tested this on a PowerMac G4 800MHz with
> > http://127.0.0.1/xfile.cfm?loop=
> > 1000 and it consistently executed in 4000ms.
> >
> > xfile.cfm:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > #GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > joe.wddx:
> >  > name='ALTTAG'>MS Commercial > name='BODY'><P>All MS&reg; models are made in the
> USA to
> > the highest quality standards.</P><P>The
> > MS&reg; Series grew out of our decades of experience with
> > Highline<SUP>TM</SUP>, Trimline, and units combined with
> the
> > time-proven technologies of The Asian&reg; series. All
MS&reg;
> > models are made in the USA to the highest quality standards.
> > </P> > code='0A'/><H2>Key Distinguishing Feature</H2> > code='0A'/><P>North America</P><TABLE
> > cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0> > code='0A'/><TBODY><TR> code='0A'/><TD
> > class=headerWhite bgColor=#ff6633>Related Links and
> > Brochures:</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> > code='0A'/><P><A target=_new
> > href="http://@url@/pdfs/P1903.pdf">The MS Series - Commercial
> > (PDF)</A></P> > name='CONTENTITEMID'>11 > name='CONTENTTYPEID'>PMP > name='DESCRIPTION'>MS Commercial have mechanical
non-computing
> > specifically designed for industrial, and fleet
> > applications. name='ERRORS'> > name='FILES'>com.jpg,P103.pdf > name='KEYWORDS'>, industrial, fleet, north
> > america > name='NAVTEXT'>MS-Commercial > name='PUBLISHDATE'>2002-3-7T0:0:0-5:0 > name='PUBLISHDAY'>07 > name='PUBLISHMONTH'>3 > name='PUBLISHYEAR'>2002 > name='TITLE'>The
> > MS Series - Commercial > name='UPLOADIMAGE'>2A2.8_MS_com.jpg > name='UPLOADPDF'>P1903.pdf > name='USERNAME'>abc > name='VERSIONNUMBER'>42 > name='VERSIONSTATUSID'>PUB >  >
> >
> > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
> >
> > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> > -- Margaret Atwood
> >
> >
> 
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Matt Liotta


While CFMX clearly doesn't perform anywhere close to as well with WDDX
as CF 5 did, you now have a new option for handling WDDX with CFMX. You
can make use of JAXB and the Java world and easily cast the resulting
objects into CF.

If you want high performance WDDX/XML parsing in Java, you have to make
use of JAXB.

Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:55 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> 
> I guess this proves both our tests..(Load Test/Ticket Count) for
wddx
> on
> CFMX and CF5.0
> Under normal load (5-10 hits per minute) this might not be an issue...
but
> for high
> traffic sites/ Load testing the app.. this really cranks the machine.
> 
> Joe
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Craig Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:59 PM
> Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> 
> 
> > >>  I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here
> > >>will be able
> > >>to confirm / deny the speed differences.
> >
> > CFMX
> >
> > p3 733
> > Debugging on
> > No Trusted Cache
> > 3400 ms (varies a little, like maybe 100ms)
> >
> > CF 5 same machine
> > 740 ms
> >
> > Also, to run on my cf5 install I hade to modify this:
> >
> > >>
> > >>#GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > to this:
> >
> >
> > 
> > #evaluate(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime)# ms
> > 
> > 
> >
> > ---why is that?
> >
> > -Craig
> >
> >
> >
> 
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Joe Eugene


I guess this proves both our tests..(Load Test/Ticket Count) for wddx on
CFMX and CF5.0
Under normal load (5-10 hits per minute) this might not be an issue... but
for high
traffic sites/ Load testing the app.. this really cranks the machine.

Joe

- Original Message -
From: "Craig Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:59 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)


> >>  I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here
> >>will be able
> >>to confirm / deny the speed differences.
>
> CFMX
>
> p3 733
> Debugging on
> No Trusted Cache
> 3400 ms (varies a little, like maybe 100ms)
>
> CF 5 same machine
> 740 ms
>
> Also, to run on my cf5 install I hade to modify this:
>
> >>
> >>#GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms
> >>
> >>
>
> to this:
>
>
> 
> #evaluate(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime)# ms
> 
> 
>
> ---why is that?
>
> -Craig
>
>
> 
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Dick Applebaum

On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:11 AM, Sean A Corfield wrote:

> I tested this on a PowerMac G4 800MHz with 
> http://127.0.0.1/xfile.cfm?loop=
> 1000 and it consistently executed in 4000ms.
>

First, the last line of the WDDX file needs > added as first char.

Second, same config as Sean

Running everything on same box

OS X
Aqua GUI
CFMX
Airport wireless networking
IE Browser

33 Processes in all--  about the minimum for all on one box

results in the 4000-4200 range

Same as above except access from separate machine via Airport

OS X
Aqua GUI
CFMX
Airport wireless networking

32 Processes in all--  about the minimum for using Full 
(workstation) OS X as a Server OS

(Apple makes a separate OS X, OS X Server that is 
configured/tuned for Web/Lan serving)

results consistently in the 3654-3677 range (one result was 4043)

Dick

__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Matt Liotta


P3 866 384 RAM CFMX (2543ms)

Using the below code on the same machine (5908ms)




 


tempDoc = XmlParse(temp);
ctemp = StructNew();

for(itr = 1; itr lte
ArrayLen(tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.XmlChildren); itr = itr + 1)
StructInsert(ctemp,
tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.var[itr].XmlAttributes.name,
tempDoc.wddxpacket.data.struct.var[itr].XmlChildren[1].XmlText);



#GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms



Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:11 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
> 
> On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:27 , Joe Eugene wrote:
> > Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
> 
> I've put together a very simple test to time wddx2cfml on various
systems.
>   I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here will be
able
> to confirm / deny the speed differences.
> 
> Two files:
> - xfile.cfm reads the WDDX packet and then times cfwddx repeatedly
> deserializing it
> - joe.wddx is Joe's WDDX (with a correction: there's a missing

> on line 34!)
> 
> I tested this on a PowerMac G4 800MHz with
> http://127.0.0.1/xfile.cfm?loop=
> 1000 and it consistently executed in 4000ms.
> 
> xfile.cfm:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> #GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms
> 
> 
> 
> 
> joe.wddx:
>  name='ALTTAG'>MS Commercial name='BODY'><P>All MS&reg; models are made in the
USA to
> the highest quality standards.</P><P>The
> MS&reg; Series grew out of our decades of experience with
> Highline<SUP>TM</SUP>, Trimline, and units combined with
the
> time-proven technologies of The Asian&reg; series. All MS&reg;
> models are made in the USA to the highest quality standards.
> </P> code='0A'/><H2>Key Distinguishing Feature</H2> code='0A'/><P>North America</P><TABLE
> cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0> code='0A'/><TBODY><TR><TD
> class=headerWhite bgColor=#ff6633>Related Links and
> Brochures:</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> code='0A'/><P><A target=_new
> href="http://@url@/pdfs/P1903.pdf">The MS Series - Commercial
> (PDF)</A></P> name='CONTENTITEMID'>11 name='CONTENTTYPEID'>PMP name='DESCRIPTION'>MS Commercial have mechanical non-computing
> specifically designed for industrial, and fleet
> applications. name='FILES'>com.jpg,P103.pdf name='KEYWORDS'>, industrial, fleet, north
> america name='NAVTEXT'>MS-Commercial name='PUBLISHDATE'>2002-3-7T0:0:0-5:0 name='PUBLISHDAY'>07 name='PUBLISHMONTH'>3 name='PUBLISHYEAR'>2002 name='TITLE'>The
> MS Series - Commercial name='UPLOADIMAGE'>2A2.8_MS_com.jpg name='UPLOADPDF'>P1903.pdf name='USERNAME'>abc name='VERSIONNUMBER'>42 name='VERSIONSTATUSID'>PUB  >
> 
> Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
> 
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
> 
> 
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Re: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread ksuh


Wow.  It looks like we can put evaluatives between hashes again.  
Shades of CF3.

To answer your question, in CF4-5, you cannot put evaluatives between 
hashes.

- Original Message -
From: Craig Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:59 am
Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

> >>  I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here 
> >>will be able 
> >>to confirm / deny the speed differences.
> 
> CFMX
> 
> p3 733
> Debugging on
> No Trusted Cache
> 3400 ms (varies a little, like maybe 100ms)
> 
> CF 5 same machine 
> 740 ms
> 
> Also, to run on my cf5 install I hade to modify this:
> 
> >>
> >>#GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms
> >>
> >>
> 
> to this:
> 
> 
> 
> #evaluate(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime)# ms
> 
> 
> 
> ---why is that?
> 
> -Craig
> 
> 
> 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Craig Thomas


>>  I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here 
>>will be able 
>>to confirm / deny the speed differences.

CFMX

p3 733
Debugging on
No Trusted Cache
3400 ms (varies a little, like maybe 100ms)

CF 5 same machine 
740 ms

Also, to run on my cf5 install I hade to modify this:

>>
>>#GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms
>>
>>

to this:



#evaluate(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime)# ms



---why is that?

-Craig


__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Chad Gray


/test2.cfm?loop=1000 
CF MX
P3 500
Debugging on
No Trusted Cache
5709 ms - 6629 ms

I don't have CF 5.0 either.


-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:27 , Joe Eugene wrote:
>   Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.

I've put together a very simple test to time wddx2cfml on various
systems.
  I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here will be
able 
to confirm / deny the speed differences.

Two files:
- xfile.cfm reads the WDDX packet and then times cfwddx repeatedly 
deserializing it
- joe.wddx is Joe's WDDX (with a correction: there's a missing 

on line 34!)

I tested this on a PowerMac G4 800MHz with
http://127.0.0.1/xfile.cfm?loop=
1000 and it consistently executed in 4000ms.

xfile.cfm:







 


#GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms




joe.wddx:
MS Commercial<P>All MS&reg; models are made in the USA
to
the highest quality standards.</P><P>The
MS&reg; Series grew out of our decades of experience with
Highline<SUP>TM</SUP>, Trimline, and units combined with the
time-proven technologies of The Asian&reg; series. All MS&reg;
models are made in the USA to the highest quality standards. 
</P><H2>Key Distinguishing Feature</H2><P>North America</P><TABLE
cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD
class=headerWhite bgColor=#ff6633>Related Links and
Brochures:</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><P><A target=_new
href="http://@url@/pdfs/P1903.pdf">The MS Series - Commercial
(PDF)</A></P>11PMPMS Commercial have mechanical non-computing
specifically designed for industrial, and fleet
applications.com.jpg,P103.pdf, industrial, fleet, north
americaMS-Commercial2002-3-7T0:0:0-5:00732002The
MS Series - Commercial2A2.8_MS_com.jpgP1903.pdfabc42PUB

Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood


__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Sean A Corfield

On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:11 , Sean A Corfield wrote:
> I've put together a very simple test to time wddx2cfml on various systems.
> ...
> 

I put both files in a 'bacfug' folder inside my web root - old habits die 
hard :)

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Sean A Corfield

On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:27 , Joe Eugene wrote: > Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX. I've put together a very simple test to time wddx2cfml on various systems. I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here will be able to confirm / deny the speed differences. Two files: - xfile.cfm reads the WDDX packet and then times cfwddx repeatedly deserializing it - joe.wddx is Joe's WDDX (with a correction: there's a missing on line 34!) I tested this on a PowerMac G4 800MHz with http://127.0.0.1/xfile.cfm?loop= 1000 and it consistently executed in 4000ms. xfile.cfm: #GetTickCount() - request.StartTime# ms joe.wddx: MS Commercial

All MS® models are made in the USA to the highest quality standards.

The MS® Series grew out of our decades of experience with Highline^TM, Trimline, and units combined with the time-proven technologies of The Asian® series. All MS® models are made in the USA to the highest quality standards.

Key Distinguishing Feature

North America

Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-31 Thread Jesse Houwing


Joe Eugene wrote:
> Noticed the "evaluate" as well but thats very minor.. right? 10ms maybe?

Yeah, but it may be yet another 10 ms. If you have a lot of traffic and 
there need to be a lot of evaluates it should introduce extra CPU load.

Jesse


__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-30 Thread Sean A Corfield


On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:27 , Joe Eugene wrote:
>   Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.

Thank you for (finally) posting some example code and data that we can try 
out. I'll try to have a look at this tomorrow (although, as I say, I don't 
have CF5 to test against). I expect other folks here will now try out your 
WDDX packet on both systems and see what happens.

I'd still recommend you actually put some getTickCount() calls around the 
code and report back the times on both CF5 and CFMX - as several people 
have (repeatedly) said here, the response time is really more important 
than the CPU usage.

Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-30 Thread Joe Eugene

Noticed the "evaluate" as well but thats very minor.. right? 10ms maybe?

Joe
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

>   // Pass the structure back to the caller
>   x = Evaluate("caller.#Attributes.ReturnStruct# = strTemp");

You could start by removing this evaluate (it shouldn't matter that 
much, but should make it faster if written as:

Jesse

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-30 Thread Jesse Houwing


>   // Pass the structure back to the caller
>   x = Evaluate("caller.#Attributes.ReturnStruct# = strTemp");

You could start by removing this evaluate (it shouldn't matter that 
much, but should make it faster if written as:



Jesse


__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-30 Thread brook


This may have been asked already, but any difference in the query time on 
CFMX?

At 01:27 AM 7/31/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Jesse/Sean,
> Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
> Scenario (Problems seen in pages where #NO 1,3,4  exists(CPU average
>85-95% ).
>
> 1. Data/Content is saved in the database (SQL2k) as a WDDX
> See wddxpacket below. Items in the packet are
>--
>(ALTTAG,BODY,CONTENTITEMID,CONTENTTYPEID,DESCRIPTION,ERRORS,
>FILES,KEYWORDS,NAVTEXT,PUBLISHDATE,PUBLISHDAY,PUBLISHMONTH,
>PUBLISHYEAR,TITLE,UPLOADIMAGE,UPLOADPDF,USERNAME,VERSIONNUMBER,VERSIONSTATUS
>ID
>--
> 2. There is a backend server that creates and populates the 
> CONTENT for
>wddxPacket..
> "We are NOT concerned with the backend".
>
> 3. Custom Tag used to get wddxPacket Data when passed the 
> ContentItemID
> 
>-
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> SELECT WDDXPacket   FROMContentVersion
> WHERE   ContentItemID = #Attributes.ContentItemID#
> AND VersionStatusID = 'PUB'
> 
> 
> 
>  output="strTemp">
> 
> // Pass the structure back to the caller
> x = Evaluate("caller.#Attributes.ReturnStruct# = strTemp");
> // Pass the successful boolean return code
> caller.bolReturnCode = 1;
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>---
>-
>
> 4. Custom Tag Call in the dynamic page when passed
>(?ContentItemID=1,..7...,20)
> -
>  ContentItemID="#url.ContentItemID#"
> ReturnStruct="strProduct">
> -
>
> 5.Output Content
> -
> #strProduct.Title#,#strProduct.BODY# 
> -
> 6.When we ran other sections of the application WITHOUT any WDDX..
> All of them ran ok and scaled quite well.
>
> 7. Load Test Results for CF5.0 and CFMX for ABOVE section of code
> gave the below results.
> CF5.0   CFMX
> Win2k   Win2k
> 600 Mhx P3  2(Dual) 750Mhx P3 (NOTE.. Bigger box)
> Avg 12% CPU Avg 85%-95% CPU
>
> Any ideas why we are seeing CPU usage shoot up in CFMX?
>Joe
>
>wddxPacket is stored in SQL2K as ntext(16) TYPE and can get upto 2-4
>pages long.
>WDDX in SQL2k saved in one FIELD(WDDXPacket) of the Table
>(ContentVersion)***
>name='ALTTAG'>MS Commercialname='BODY'><P>All MS&reg; models are made in the USA to
>the highest quality standards.</P><P>The
>MS&reg; Series grew out of our decades of experience with
>Highline<SUP>TM</SUP>, Trimline, and units combined with the
>time-proven technologies of The Asian&reg; series. All MS&reg;
>models are made in the USA to the highest quality standards. </P>code='0A'/><H2>Key Distinguishing Feature</H2>code='0A'/><P>North America</P><TABLE
>cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0>code='0A'/><TBODY><TR><TD
>class=headerWhite bgColor=#ff6633>Related Links and
>Brochures:</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>code='0A'/><P><A target=_new
>href="http://@url@/pdfs/P1903.pdf">The MS Series - Commercial
>(PDF)</A></P>name='CONTENTITEMID'>11name='CONTENTTYPEID'>PMPname='DESCRIPTION'>MS Commercial have mechanical non-computing
>specifically designed for industrial, and fleet
>applications.name='FILES'>com.jpg,P103.pdfname='KEYWORDS'>, industrial, fleet, north
>americaname='NAVTEXT'>MS-Commercialname='PUBLISHDATE'>2002-3-7T0:0:0-5:0name='PUBLISHDAY'>07name='PUBLISHMONTH'>3name='PUBLISHYEAR'>2002The
>MS Series - Commercialname='UPLOADIMAGE'>2A2.8_MS_com.jpgname='UPLOADPDF'>P1903.pdfname='USERNAME'>abc>name='VERSIONNUMBER'>42name='VERSIONSTATUSID'>PUBt>
>
>---

RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)

2002-07-30 Thread Joe Eugene


Jesse/Sean,
Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
Scenario (Problems seen in pages where #NO 1,3,4  exists(CPU average
85-95% ).

1. Data/Content is saved in the database (SQL2k) as a WDDX
See wddxpacket below. Items in the packet are
--
(ALTTAG,BODY,CONTENTITEMID,CONTENTTYPEID,DESCRIPTION,ERRORS,
FILES,KEYWORDS,NAVTEXT,PUBLISHDATE,PUBLISHDAY,PUBLISHMONTH,
PUBLISHYEAR,TITLE,UPLOADIMAGE,UPLOADPDF,USERNAME,VERSIONNUMBER,VERSIONSTATUS
ID
--
2. There is a backend server that creates and populates the CONTENT for
wddxPacket..
"We are NOT concerned with the backend".

3. Custom Tag used to get wddxPacket Data when passed the ContentItemID
-






SELECT WDDXPacket   FROMContentVersion
WHERE   ContentItemID = #Attributes.ContentItemID#
AND VersionStatusID = 'PUB'





// Pass the structure back to the caller
x = Evaluate("caller.#Attributes.ReturnStruct# = strTemp");
// Pass the successful boolean return code
caller.bolReturnCode = 1;





---
-

4. Custom Tag Call in the dynamic page when passed
(?ContentItemID=1,..7...,20)
-

-

5.Output Content
-
#strProduct.Title#,#strProduct.BODY# 
-
6.When we ran other sections of the application WITHOUT any WDDX..
All of them ran ok and scaled quite well.

7. Load Test Results for CF5.0 and CFMX for ABOVE section of code
gave the below results.
CF5.0   CFMX
Win2k   Win2k
600 Mhx P3  2(Dual) 750Mhx P3 (NOTE.. Bigger box)
Avg 12% CPU Avg 85%-95% CPU

Any ideas why we are seeing CPU usage shoot up in CFMX?
Joe

wddxPacket is stored in SQL2K as ntext(16) TYPE and can get upto 2-4
pages long.
WDDX in SQL2k saved in one FIELD(WDDXPacket) of the Table
(ContentVersion)***
MS Commercial<P>All MS&reg; models are made in the USA to
the highest quality standards.</P><P>The
MS&reg; Series grew out of our decades of experience with
Highline<SUP>TM</SUP>, Trimline, and units combined with the
time-proven technologies of The Asian&reg; series. All MS&reg;
models are made in the USA to the highest quality standards. </P><H2>Key Distinguishing Feature</H2><P>North America</P><TABLE
cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD
class=headerWhite bgColor=#ff6633>Related Links and
Brochures:</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><P><A target=_new
href="http://@url@/pdfs/P1903.pdf">The MS Series - Commercial
(PDF)</A></P>11PMPMS Commercial have mechanical non-computing
specifically designed for industrial, and fleet
applications.com.jpg,P103.pdf, industrial, fleet, north
americaMS-Commercial2002-3-7T0:0:0-5:00732002The
MS Series - Commercial2A2.8_MS_com.jpgP1903.pdfabc>42PUB

--------------------
---
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?


Joe-

I'll weigh in here and try to make it simple:

Q: What is different in WDDX?

A: Everything. Every slice, splice and piece of code. Completely and totally
different.

What is changed in the syntax? Not much.


The question everyone wants to know is: What code are you running that you
are saying is slower than CF5?

Much like the current thread on the loading of the text file: What is the
template you are running that is going slow?

Engineering/Development here in-house cannot fix a bug we cannot define, or
identify.

Saying "WDDX is slow" does nothing. Saying "WDDX translation given X and Y
data is slow vs CF5" helps us more.

This way, a bug can be entered, escalated and a patch can be generated.

Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development
Unix/Linux "special guy"

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:08 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?
>
> >
> > OK, th

Key Distinguishing Feature

96 matches

Mail list logo