> Oops. Forgot to mention we use CF5 Enterprise (for the
> Oracle Native drivers).
One thing you might run into, whether you migrate from CF 5 to BlueDragon or
to MX, is that you'll be using JDBC drivers to connect to Oracle, and there
are often little differences between how they w
Oops. Forgot to mention we use CF5 Enterprise (for the Oracle Native drivers).
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Lofback, Chris
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 9:52 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: BlueDragon in production?
>
>
> I am looki
I am looking at BlueDragon and would like to know who is using it for their production apps. Can you offer a brief evaluation? Stable? Fast? Any incompatibilites other than the unsupported tags mentioned in the docs? We are currently using CF5/Win2K/IIS/Oracle with client variables in a load
d Blue Dragon. Then set up a virtual directory for BD and change some of the configuration for it. To quote from the article (see http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=42069):
--
Let's take stock of what you've done to your machine thus far. ColdFusion 5, ColdFusion MX, and BlueDragon are
On Sat, 2004-04-03 at 05:08, Spectrum Web wrote:
> It's possible? Thanx in advance.
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/products/bluedragon-beta/download/home
Download the Installation Guide(pdf)
Look at section 3.2 Running Alongside ColdFusion and Servlet/JSP Engines
(
My xpdf program
It's possible? Thanx in advance.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
how far does bd 6.1 go in its i18n support? do you use cf style "locales" or
java's? fully support cultural formatting, etc.?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Hi Lola,
Yes, Unicode is supported in the BlueDragon 6.1 release, currently nearing
the end of beta testing (the final release should happen before the end of
April). Unicode is not supported in earlier releases of BlueDragon.
I'll ask the marketing folk to make this more clear on the web
Is Unicode supported in BlueDragon? If so, what is the extent of support? I checked New Atlanta's website but I don't see anything obvious.
--
Lola - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lolajl.net | Blog at http://www..lolajl.net/blog/
Terrorism delenda est! (Terrorism must be
At 12:32 PM -0800 3/10/04, Rob wrote:
>I just downloaded it... awsome product :) better the pgaccess in my
>opnion (for those of you on old postgres)
I would have to agree that this is a great product. And the developer is very responsive; there's a mailing list on Yahoogroups named aquadatastudi
On Friday 12 Mar 2004 07:35 am, Peter Tilbrook wrote:
> Macromedia just recently released an updater to JRun 4 ('tis Updater 3)
> which fixes numerous issues with JDBC drivers.
>
> If anyone on the list has info on what environment the updater is best
> applied on please let us know (eg: CFMX 6.1 s
Well it can't be any worse then EM. Might try it myself.
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yep. Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability to talk
to a
> wide variety of dbs. Of course, since it's not MS-specific, it doesn't
have all
> the bell
n.com/
_
From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2004 3:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
I just downloaded it too and it looks awesome, but am having problems
connecting to MSDE instances. I'm not sure where to specify the ins
Rob MSDE is Microsoft SQL Desktop Engine.
Aqua Data is the way to go. I have learned allot from you all today.
Thanks! ~dB
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
On Wed
P/IP. (worked nicely out of the box on postgres
7.2 - though there was no box)
... you know there were a lot of abbreviations in that; let me know if I
can help.
> -Frank
> - Original Message -
> From: Rob
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:32 PM
>
setup to use Windows Auth. I don't
> > see that option in this software.
>
> I don't know about BlueDragon specifically, but with CFMX you
> can't use Windows authentication through the MS SQL Server
> JDBC driver. If you need to use Windows authentication, you&#x
th. I don't see that option in this software.
I don't know about BlueDragon specifically, but with CFMX you can't use
Windows authentication through the MS SQL Server JDBC driver. If you need to
use Windows authentication, you'd have to use the ODBC Socket driver, and I
wouldn'
on in this software.
-Frank
- Original Message -
From: Rob
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yep. Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yep. Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability to talk to a
> wide variety of dbs. Of course, since it's not MS-specific, it doesn't have all
> the bells and whistles of EM, but it's the best thing out there if you have to
ome of the things it can do that they were relying on
> DWMX or Access for.
>
> -Matt
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2004, at 11:11 AM, David Berry wrote:
>
> > very interesting.. Altought I do code by hand I also
> > sometimes find the feature in the binding panels very h
Yep, I use the same. It rocks.
Stace
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
I can't remember the last time I used RDS. There's a terrific tool
called Aqua D
Access for.
-Matt
On Mar 10, 2004, at 11:11 AM, David Berry wrote:
> very interesting.. Altought I do code by hand I also
> sometimes find the feature in the binding panels very handy
> to use. I have also posted this on the blueDragon list so
> see what there response is.
>
>
Actually, the cool part of using DWMX (and CFS) here is that you can see the table/column names within the IDE. Not the generation of code!
Calvin
- Original Message -
From: Tony Weeg
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver
, David Berry wrote:
> very interesting.. Altought I do code by hand I also
> sometimes find the feature in the binding panels very handy
> to use. I have also posted this on the blueDragon list so
> see what there response is.
>
>
> > We have DW and CFMX, but our serve
very interesting.. Altought I do code by hand I also
sometimes find the feature in the binding panels very handy
to use. I have also posted this on the blueDragon list so
see what there response is.
> We have DW and CFMX, but our server guys have
> disabled RDS for security
>
> Plus you're in control of what's being written!!!
>
You can use any code generator and still retain full control of what's being
written. It just require an extra investment since you need to know the way
the code generator works and tweak it to fit your needs (DW is very
extensible).
BTW CF MX
> > Yes, it disable that feature
> >
>
> Then how do you do any database work using BlueDragon and
> Dreamweaver?
We have DW and CFMX, but our server guys have disabled RDS for security
reasons. So it's not just BlueDragon users in this boat.
We write our own code
Plus you're in control of what's being written!!!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 15:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
do it by hand. for sure. much faster/better/easier than any other ide coul
do it by hand. for sure. much faster/better/easier than any other ide could
give you
-Original Message-
From: John Beynon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
I use DWMX for all my coding but I don&#
I use DWMX for all my coding but I don't think I've ever used it's features
for 'database' work, preferring to do it by hand...
-Original Message-
From: David Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 15:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dr
> Then how do you do any database work using BlueDragon and
> Dreamweaver?
Not having the Binding Panel enabled doesn't prevent you from making any
database work :-)
After all, you just edit text file, you could easily get rid of DW at all
and still be hap
> Yes, it disable that feature
>
Then how do you do any database work using BlueDragon and
Dreamweaver?
davidBerry
BerryNet Design
Cell: 517-204-5454
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
> How do you set up your database tables using the bindings
> tab when you have to sign on using RDS and BlueDragon does
> not support it. Does this not disable a big feature of
> dreamweaver mx when using BlueDragon or am I missing
> something simple?
Yes, it disab
I have just started trying to use BlueDragon 6.1 beta on a
development box instead of macromedia coldfusion MX. One
thing I might be missing and am looking for some advise on
is within dreamweaver mx.
How do you set up your database tables using the bindings
tab when you have to sign on
To get the number of active sessions in BlueDragon, use the following:
AppMgr=CreateObject("java","com.naryx.tagfusion.cfm.application.cfAPPLICATIO
N")>
Note that this gives the total number of sessions, and not the number of
sessions for a particular application
For the first one, if you remove the closing tag it will remove
the error (the closing tag is unnecessary; if you remove it your
code is still compatible with CF5/MX). This issue is documented in the
BlueDragon CFML Compatibility Guide:
"BlueDragon does not support closing tags for tags th
Hi Rick,
You might want to post this question to the BlueDragon-Interest mailing
list, since that's where most BlueDragon users gather:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index
.cfm
Also, be sure to ask about BlueDragon's advantages compared to C
Hi Peter,
For the first one, if you remove the closing tag it will remove
the error (the closing tag is unnecessary; if you remove it your
code is still compatible with CF5/MX). This issue is documented in the
BlueDragon CFML Compatibility Guide:
"BlueDragon does not support closing tag
Am getting this error:
Type Template
Message Missing start tag
Tag
Position Line=24; Column=53
Detail The tag had no corresponding opening tag
Source 21: URLToPull = "http://www.easycfm.com/syndication/EasyFeed.xml";
22:
23:
24:
With the line of code above.
And also this error:
Type Invali
I am looking at BlueDragon Server JX and wanted to here what everyone thinks
about it.
What are its faults Compared to CF5/CFMX?
Thank you
Rick
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Greetings!
The second beta of BlueDragon 6.1 is now available for download:
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/products/bluedragon-beta/download/home
In addition to numerous bug fixes, the search feature (CFCOLLECTION,
CFINDEX, and CFSEARCH) is now integrated in this release.
Note that these are
I was hoping to present a "Flex" or Central presentation at the next meeting
on December 10. Of course I was one of the many not accepted to the beta and
the NDA would no doubt be problematic.
Instead I have chosed to present BlueDragon 6.1 (beta). We need to keep CFML
alive and BlueD
n't know
that would cover things. However, maybe if others chime in we can all
get a more thorough list.
The disadvantages list is pretty easy I think. Anything CFMX does that
BlueDragon doesn't would be on that list. I believe the BlueDragon
compatibility guide does a good job
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> >> ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
> >> chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
>
> Any chance of elaboration on that point? Main advantages/disadvanta
Matt wrote:
>> ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
>> chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
Any chance of elaboration on that point? Main advantages/disadvantages?
-dc
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subs
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:56 pm, Matt Liotta wrote:
> > We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheaper alternative than CFMX.
> choice and BlueDragon's strong showing as of 6.1 just made that choice
> a lot harder than it used to be by implemented much of CFMX.
:nods
That's one of the things that h
> We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheaper alternative than CFMX.
>
While that is certainly one difference between BlueDragon and
ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
6.
New Atlanta is pleased to announce the beta1 release of BlueDragon 6.1,
which is now available for download and testing:
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/products/bluedragon-beta/download/home
Among the many new features added to BlueDragon 6.1 are:
- CFCs
- Web Services
- XML
New Atlanta now have a beta version of BlueDragon 6.1 available that not only follows CFMX's
version numbering but also adds some of the MX-specific features like CFCs, web services an
For those interested, the problem was determined to be specifically a
problem not with CFHTTP in general (in BlueDragon) but instead one of doing
CFHTTP from a page on our internal web server calling to a page on IIS. We
are investigating this particular bug and hope to have it fixed as a part of
Cheers Daniel, I have subscribed.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Ganter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 October 2003 14:13
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFHTTP Posts with Bluedragon free
Hi Craig,
I've forwarded your issue to the BlueDragon Product Interest
List.
Yo
Hi Craig,
I've forwarded your issue to the BlueDragon Product Interest
List.
You may want to join the list for more direct interaction
with our engineers:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/arch
ive_search/index.cfm
Regards,
Dan
Daniel Ganter
New Atlanta Communica
e suggestions.
-Original Message-
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 October 2003 13:13
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFHTTP Posts with Bluedragon free
Craig could it perhaps be something to do with the size? I
noticed you
said the packets are quite large. Does it wor
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 October 2003 13:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFHTTP Posts with Bluedragon free
Thanks for the suggestion Kola,
Have tried it on 5.0 and 6.1 , it works without issue.
Craig.
-Original Message-
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 October 2003
Thanks for the suggestion Kola,
Have tried it on 5.0 and 6.1 , it works without issue.
Craig.
-Original Message-
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 October 2003 13:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFHTTP Posts with Bluedragon free
As a suggestion, why don&#
with Bluedragon free
While I never usually use cfhttp, a particular client wishes to use
Bluedragon 3.0 free edition as a bridge for his internal system and our
web server, I'm formatting xml packets form his queries and posting to
our box, or trying to.
I simply cannot get CFHTTP to POST at all,
While I never usually use cfhttp, a particular client wishes to use
Bluedragon 3.0 free edition as a bridge for his internal system and our
web server, I'm formatting xml packets form his queries and posting to
our box, or trying to.
I simply cannot get CFHTTP to POST at all, GET's wor
P.S. For those of you who might be skeptical:
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.linuxworld.com
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al.
FYI
FYI, you might be interested to know that the following web site is running
on BlueDragon Server JX (all of the ".htm" pages are really dynamic CFML
pages being served by BlueDragon--there are no static pages on the site):
http://www.linuxworld.com
That server has the
Ah there is the answer.:-)Hey, my board supports multiple CPUs. might be an idea for us over hereeventually.- Yves - -Original Message- From: Daniel Ganter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 26, 2003 10:54 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al. Mike
Alright, thanks Daniel, I appreciate the help. M -Original Message- From: Daniel Ganter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 9:54 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al. Mike, The license is for a server, with no restrictions on the number of cpus
You could try posting on this listhttp://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index.cfmI may be wrong, I'm not sure.I also just checked through the site and didn't find any reference tomultiple CPUs for the free version.This is all I found, with reference t
Mike,The license is for a server, with norestrictions on the number of cpus.The definitive source for use of BlueDragon Serveris the Software License Agreement (SLA).Regards,DanDaniel GanterNew Atlanta Communicationswww.newatlanta.com-Original Message-From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL
>I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project and considering using>BlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am not misreading>anything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drivers, costs nothing in>terms of a license. Can anyone (maybe from New Atlanta) confirm this
o: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al. The free version of BD server is free to use. In development or production/deployment. I have a copy of it (3.0.2) running on a Linux Mandrake serverfor a community project that we're building. So far I'm still in development. hav
I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project andconsidering using BlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am notmisreading anything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drivers,costs nothing in terms of a license. Can anyone (maybe from New Atlanta)confirm this is accurate
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 26, 2003 10:20 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Bluedragon Licensing et al. I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project and considering using BlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am not misreading anything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drive
I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project and considering usingBlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am not misreadinganything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drivers, costs nothing interms of a license. Can anyone (maybe from New Atlanta) confirm this isaccurate? Also
> -Original Message-
> From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:34 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: SW Costs, BlueDragon, etc. (was:DWMX 2004 - Whats new for
> us?)
>
> Jim Davis wrote:
> >
> > True. I&#
Yes, BlueDragon 3.0.2 is supported on Red Hat 9 (though I'm not sure if the
web site has been updated to reflect this). Of course, when it's released
BlueDragon 3.1 will also run on Red Hat 9.
BlueDragon 3.1 will support Apache 2.0, as well as the older Apache 1.3.x
releases.
Vince Bo
e pursuing an
> untried "free" solution.
>
Jim,
Your points are absolutely valid from the perspective of a custom project--a
few hundred dollars isn't really going to make a difference. But, let's say
you've built a "packaged" solution written in CFML that yo
On Tuesday 02 Sep 2003 16:02 pm, Jillian Carroll wrote:
> Has anybody installed it successfully on this OS? What about later
> versions of Apache (they recommend 1.3.27)
If it's only the Apache that is the sticking point, go get a copy of
ApacheTool box and roll your own (rpm) of Apache 1.3, as
I'm working on a migration plan for a Linux server I manage... and while it
is logical for us to move to RedHat 9 at this time, we are also looking at
BlueDragon --and it does not appear that it supports this version of Linux.
Has anybody installed it successfully on this OS? What about
e pros
and cons, and indeed the challenges (in the Compatibility Guide). We also
offer a BlueDragon-Interest list where both New Atlanta engineers and
customers discuss the product in a friendly, responsive environment.
As for MX features, again, the bulk of those are slated for our Release 4
vers
Greetings!
The BlueDragon 3.0.2 service pack has been released and is available for
download:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/download.jsp
This service pack contains over 70 bug fixes and performance enhancements.
Regards,
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http
Vince,
I would be very interested in participating in such a program -- looking forward to
your reply.
Jas
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_li
Jas,
We have a pilot project under way with a select number of BlueDragon
customers to do exactly what you want to do. I'll contact you privately to
discuss the details.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From:
I see,
I was hoping it would compile the cfml templates into an all in one binary executable
that included the webserver in it for easy distribution.
Appreciate the insight sean, look forward to Vince's reply.
Jas
~|
Archives:
be distributed.
I'm sure Vince will popup to explain but my understanding is that BD
"compiles" CFML to a binary format - an internal BlueDragon format -
and then lets you create archive files containing that binary code...
which you then have to deploy on a J2EE server.
Sean A
Dave,
Thanks, I just slammed my head into my keyboard. What I meant to ask
about was the "Compiled Binary Deployment" feature.
BD apparently compiles all the code into one binary executable that can
be distributed. I am wondering if someone can point me to some
documentation on the feature,
> BD website states: "Package portable CFML applications
> within standard J2EE Web ARchive (WAR) and Enterprise
> ARchive (EAR) files; "
>
> Is this feature available in all versions of BD? Or just
> specific ones? I think as a developer, it would be amazing
> to be able to whip up a self-inst
Hi,
I apologize if this question is redundant, it didnt seem to clearly
process into my head, or I haven't had enough coffee today ;)
BD website states: "Package portable CFML applications within standard
J2EE Web ARchive (WAR) and Enterprise ARchive (EAR) files; "
Is this feature available in
a couple of things.
So I don't quite remember its history. I may install from scratch.
I am running w2k, ntfs. cleaning registry now...
Eric
From: "Vince Bonfanti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: FREE BlueD
Hi Eric,
See responses inserted below.
Vince
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:14 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
>
>
> When I install on a machine without
crashes when I go there later.
Does this make sense?
Eric
From: "Vince Bonfanti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:10:31 -0500
Yes CFMX and BlueDragon (and C
I ahev installed Blue Dragon Server on my WinXP machine at the house with
excellent results, but I have tried to run it at work on our Win2K server
with IIS 5.0 and I have some issues... Maybe one of you know why...
When I hit http://localhost with my machine I get the Blue Dragon Default
page...
examples.
Finally, for anyone who's interested, we'll be demonstrating BlueDragon for
.NET in our booth at MXNorth (the first ever public demonstration).
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mail
On Saturday, Feb 22, 2003, at 07:24 US/Pacific, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> My apologies--CFMX does indeed offer similar capabilities as
> BlueDragon in
> this regard. It was an oversight on my part, and not a deliberate
> attempt to
> mislead.
No problem. I expected it was just an
On Saturday, February 22, 2003, at 10:24 AM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> Note that the BlueDragon implementation is via the new PAGE attribute
> of the
> CFINCLUDE tag (and not via the GetPageContext function), which allows
> you to
> include the output of JSP pages or servlets
> > You don't even have to do that. You can just enable
> > BlueDragon or CFMX or CF5 within specific virtual
> > servers or directories, on Apache or IIS.
>
> I would be interested in seeing more details on this
> "feature"
I've described this
|
| You don't even have to do that. You can just enable BlueDragon or CFMX or
| CF5 within specific virtual servers or directories, on Apache or IIS.
|
| Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
| http://www.figleaf.com/
| voice: (202) 797-5496
| fax: (202) 797-5444
|
I would be interest
> > The only conflict to watch out for is when you go to
> > install a web server adapter to IIS or Apache--in that
> > case you can only have one of BlueDragon/CFMX/CF5
> > attached to the web server.
>
> But you can just use ProxyPass or mod_rewrite to map the
On Saturday 22 Feb 2003 17:10 pm, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> The only conflict to watch out for is when you go to install a web server
> adapter to IIS or Apache--in that case you can only have one of
> BlueDragon/CFMX/CF5 attached to the web server.
But you can just use ProxyPass or mod_r
Contact "Aaron Z. Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about it.
Also, there's a seperate BlueDragon list on House of Fusion where BD specific
issues can be discussed. Hosting, install, admin and the like are perfect for
that list. In addition, there's a list on the DB site itself
Howdy,
Is anyone hosting third-party commercial sites running under BlueDragon
yet? If so, is there a list of BlueDragon hosts anywhere?
--
Chris Montgomerymonty @ airtightweb.com
Airtight Web Services http://www.airtightweb.com
Web Development, Web Project Management, Software Sales
Yes CFMX and BlueDragon (and CF5) can all peacefully co-exist on the same
machine.
CFMX has a built-in web server that runs on port 8500 by default. BlueDragon
Server has a built-in web server that runs on port 8080 by default--as long
as you don't have anything already installed using port
Vince,
I apologize if I missed your response on this, but my question was if CFMX
and BlueDragon can co-exist on a development server for testing and maybe
access blue dragon on a port other that 80?
Thanks,
Frank Mamone
- Original Message -
From: "Vince Bonfanti" <[EM
My apologies--CFMX does indeed offer similar capabilities as BlueDragon in
this regard. It was an oversight on my part, and not a deliberate attempt to
mislead.
Note that the BlueDragon implementation is via the new PAGE attribute of the
CFINCLUDE tag (and not via the GetPageContext function
tlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: AJ W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 6:54 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
>
>
> I hope that New Atlanta has worked on the compatibility
> problems I was seeing l
On Friday, Feb 21, 2003, at 13:49 US/Pacific, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> In this case we're using the BlueDragon/J2EE edition running within a
> standard J2EE WAR file side-by-side with the JSP pages. In fact, some
> of the
> common page elements (headers, footers, menu bars) ar
601 - 700 of 914 matches
Mail list logo
