Hi!
Frankly i don’t see the meaning in getting so upset in this.
Maybe in 20 years you have your headphones built-in to your brain and pair
yourself with the iphone or what it now is.
I am not worrid at all just curious.
/A
> On 20 Jan 2016, at 23:21, Scott Granados wrote:
>
> I’m personally not
;>>> Hi!
>>>>> Possibly.
>>>>> But bluetooth is not as good quality as airplay if you’re not using the
>>>>> atpx protocol which apple doesn’t do.
>>>>> /A
>>>>>> 19 jan. 2016 kl. 00:45 skrev Christopher-Mark Gil
Remember that original CDs are not lossy I don’t believe. If memory serves it
was 44.1 KHZ stereo uncompressed which used a little less than 10 megabytes per
minute. So a 655 megabyte CD holds roughly and I mean roughly 70 minutes of
audio. So I think it fits.
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:04 PM,
Ja ja ja ja ja ja ja ja ja. Agree! The future is great!
Take care
21. jan. 2016 kl. 11:16 skrev Terje Strømberg :
Meridian company is on to something that can become a promising high quality
hifi audio sound. Tidal is one compaany that will have some amount fo songs in
their library, maybe bef
Meridian company is on to something that can become a promising high quality
hifi audio sound. Tidal is one compaany that will have some amount fo songs in
their library, maybe before this summer. If it is good, others will follow or
already is. http://www.mqa.co.uk
Take care
21. jan. 2016 k
Well, you could certainly keep AIFF or Wav files, and they’d be a lot easier to
edit, but no, I was thinking of compressed lossless encoders like FLAC and
ALAC. ALAC is Apple’s codec and is used by AirPlay and supported by iTunes.
FLAC is an open format supported by most everybody else.
--
T
Lossless encoders, like AIFF or something? That's the format I'm most familiar
with, as some Creative Commons stuff comes with MP3 and AIFF versions.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>
> Red Book CDs (i.e., the kind you play in your CD player) are
Red Book CDs (i.e., the kind you play in your CD player) are lossless PCM (i.e.
mostly like Wav or AIFF) with a 16-bit sample, 44100 samples per second, two
channels. That means it takes about 10.1 MB per minute of audio. And yes, an
hour of CD audio is about 640 MB. no problem for today’s ha
I don't think a 700MB regular CD can hold an album of lossless audio, can it?
With each song being a good 50MB or so?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>
> I seem to be very lucky in not being among those frequently beset by AirPlay
> dropouts, but
through making that 3.5 inch jack do digital as well as analog.
- Original Message -
From: "Terje Strømberg"
To:
Cc: "Terje Strømberg"
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
An iPhone repair engineer confirmed that the 3.
I seem to be very lucky in not being among those frequently beset by AirPlay
dropouts, but in any case it and Kleer are worthwhile investments for me. I
need lossless quality. Maybe not higher definition, but certainly lossless.
Encoders are the problem. Really. If we could just get decent
bluetooth model
devices out there, that maybe Apple just didn't see the point.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Hi!
One thing i am concerned about is why there’s not
I’m personally not that invested in the 3.5MM cable. If an adapter exists I’m
happy. Either way I don’t care if it’s included or not, frankly I’d rather it
was thin than had a 3.5MM jack.
But my answer changes if there’s no reasonable adapter.
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Terje Strømberg w
not using the
>>>> atpx protocol which apple doesn’t do.
>>>> /A
>>>>> 19 jan. 2016 kl. 00:45 skrev Christopher-Mark Gilland
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm wonderring if that may be because there are so many bluetooth model
>&g
essage - From: "Anders Holmberg"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Hi!
One thing i am concerned about is why there’s not any airplay headphones around
yet?
/A
On 18 Jan 2016, at 15:37, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
I’m afraid I
gt;> I'm wonderring if that may be because there are so many bluetooth model
>>> devices out there, that maybe Apple just didn't see the point.
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>> - Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
>>
s
out there, that maybe Apple just didn't see the point.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Hi!
One thing i am concerned about is why there’s not any airplay headphone
An iPhone repair engineer confirmed that the 3.5mm audio output is quite
space-requiring. So, the space saving theory have good odds.
Take care
20. jan. 2016 kl. 12:44 skrev Scott Granados :
Personally, I think the whole change comes down to space savings. They may
save money but the big thi
Hi!
As i stated in an earlier message airplay sound quality is far better than
bluetooth.
However i agree with the dropouts on airplay.
But its better than it was back 3 years ago.
/A
> 19 jan. 2016 kl. 14:24 skrev Ricardo Walker :
>
> A couple reasons. The first being money. Why pay Apple to lic
It is best to let apple know that there is many customers out there that like
to use the 3.5mm headphone connector now at this time, not later, when the
3.5mm is gone on the next model. Ehen it is gone it is gone. To late.
Take care
20. jan. 2016 kl. 12:06 skrev Bill Gallik :
I have to wonder
because there are so many bluetooth model
>>>> devices out there, that maybe Apple just didn't see the point.
>>>>
>>>> Chris.
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
>>>>
>>>>
ing if that may be because there are so many bluetooth model devices
out there, that maybe Apple just didn't see the point.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Hi!
On
gt;>> :
>>>
>>> I'm wonderring if that may be because there are so many bluetooth model
>>> devices out there, that maybe Apple just didn't see the point.
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>> - Original Message - From: "
t;>
>> Chris.
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
>> To:
>> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
>>
>>
>> Hi!
>> One thing i am concerned about is why there’
there, that maybe Apple just didn't see the point.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
>
>
> Hi!
> One thing i am concerned abo
Personally, I think the whole change comes down to space savings. They may save money but the big thing they want is more realestate to put components in the phone and or the ability to make it thinner. I doubt the human ear gains much by having the signal handed to the headphones digitally or o
I have to wonder if Apple is really planning on changing the headphone jack. I
also wonder if the eventual iPhone 7 will come complete with the necessary
audio jack adapter included?
But the bottom line to me is this, if Apple does incorporate an alternative
connection to the current jack do
Heh yes I remember that one. Well, that may be one way to "collect"
feedback.
From E.T.'s Keyboard...
ancient.ali...@icloud.com
Many believe that we have been visited
in the past. What if it were true?
On 1/19/2016 8:45 AM, Scott Granados wrote:
I wouldn’t go that far, the leak what they
I wouldn’t go that far, the leak what they want to create buzz as well. Many
of the rumors are dead on and you should weight the sources by their previous
accuracy.
Also, sometimes you even have apple leaving devices in bars, oops.:)
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 11:37 AM, E.T. wrote:
>
> Its anyb
Its anybody's guess until September. Until then, its nothing but
speculation. Apple, as well as any other company, is not in the habit of
releasing information ahead of product release to market. To do so is
suicide.
From E.T.'s Keyboard...
ancient.ali...@icloud.com
Many believe that we
Ok, I'm really confused here, how exactly is this supposed to work here? is
this secondary adapter we carry around with the headphones themselves, or a
whole different set of headphones we have to purchase?
On Jan 18, 2016, at 5:54 AM, Terje Strømberg wrote:
> Friends,
>
> If the rumours are
Exactly, My family and I are all IPhone users, and all of them accept myself
are sighted, and my dad and I have both had complaints at one point when IOS 6,
I think it was, came out, that allowed maps to announce turn-by-turn
directions, but it also had a lot of other issues, and he and I both h
new Apple TV.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So Apple has very good reason for change. Its simple. People want
>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From E.T.'s Keyboard...
>>>>>> ancient.ali...@iclou
Keyboard...
>>>> ancient.ali...@icloud.com
>>>> Many believe that we have been visited
>>>> in the past. What if it were true?
>>>>
>>>> On 1/18/2016 7:12 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
>>>>> Yes, the 3.5 m jack would go bye by
Actually, you can do more with a 3.5 MM jack than your thinking including 5.1.
I have a DAT machine that uses the 3.5 inch jack format on the DAT side to
provide SPDIF and there’s an adapter to the standard RCA type SPDIF connector.
You’re drinking the cool aid to much on the lightning cable, a
Hi,
I think "have to" isn’t the way too look at it. I mean, we didn’t have to
abandon the 3.5 floppy, or the optical drive, or traditional hard disks. We
didn’t have to abandon CRT monitors, and non USB connections for keyboards and
mice. For either form or function, something better comes a lo
A couple reasons. The first being money. Why pay Apple to license airplay to
put in your headphones, when you can just use bluetooth for wireless
connectivity. Second is quality. I can tell you, I’ve had airplay drop far more
than I’ve had bluetooth drop.
hth
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 5:12 PM, Ande
@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2016 2:49 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
None of that explains why they have to abandon the headphone jack. Your point
about the M4A encoding quality doesn't real
: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2016 2:49 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
None of that explains why they have to abandon the headphone jack. Your point
about the M4A encoding qu
hange audio routing. I'd say Airplay has a lot more delay than
Bluetooth does, for whatever reason.
- Original Message - From: "Christopher-Mark Gilland"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
I'm wonderring if that ma
tooth does, for
whatever reason.
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher-Mark Gilland"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
I'm wonderring if that may be because there are so many bluetooth model
devices out there, that ma
I'm wonderring if that may be because there are so many bluetooth model
devices out there, that maybe Apple just didn't see the point.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: "Anders Holmberg"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headp
:
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
But if you go to Europe with AC powered devices in tow, you do need
adapters. And that concept is exactly what will make this change by
Apple quite edible if in fact it is true.
From E.T.'s Keyboard...
o: "'Chris Blouch' via MacVisionaries"
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
I think the issue with Apple “Moving on” is that the consumer is never ready
for it. In a sense, that’s a testament to Apple’s forward-thinking
approach, but it
: Monday, January 18, 2016 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Ray,
You! are also failing to see something though. You're point is valid and
well taken, don't get me wrong here, but what about those who don't have
headphones with a lightning connecter. Or wh
Hi!
One thing i am concerned about is why there’s not any airplay headphones around
yet?
/A
> On 18 Jan 2016, at 15:37, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>
> I’m afraid I just can’t quite bring myself to be sufficiently moved. I don’t
> like planned obsolescence or proprietary standards either, but
Hi!
And why fight about this?
Its what it is and we can not do much about it.
Even if we sign a petition or anything i don’t think its gonna be worse.
Why don’t make voiceover more accessible and more flexible.
Personally i would like apple to understand how important voiceover is for us
blind peo
d truly get that benefit is no adapter. Plug directly in,
which means new headphones for us, which means more marketting by Apple, and
more money for Apple.
I'm just sayin'.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Ray Foret Jr
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, Janua
To: "'Chris Blouch' via MacVisionaries"
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Standards are good. I love standards.
Europe standardised on Micro USB so iPhone users could charge from many
points. Apple’s response was to make u
Hi Chris,
No, you could continue to use Lightning. Europe simply standardised the
universal charger to be Micro USB. In other words, your phone had to support
it, somehow, in order to be compliant. This was intended to reduce electrical
waste, a laudable goal in itself, by reducing the numbe
aries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Maybe a one finger triple press.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 18, 2016, at 3:15 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
wrote:
What I! want to know is, if they're doing away with the home button,
t: Monday, January 18, 2016 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Standards are good. I love standards.
Europe standardised on Micro USB so iPhone users could charge from many
points. Apple’s response was to make us an adaptor, at cost, which is not
available outside the EEA. Th
: Monday, January 18, 2016 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
if this shockingly stupid decision is taken by apple do you think adapters
would become available?
this would be a very stupid decision, think of the bad press is what i would
be screaming at them.
On 19 Jan 2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
--
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
list.
If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you
feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or
moderators
which I'm
> quite confident they will do so.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: David Chittenden
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 2:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
>
> According to variou
Standards are good. I love standards.
Europe standardised on Micro USB so iPhone users could charge from many points.
Apple’s response was to make us an adaptor, at cost, which is not available
outside the EEA. This rather negated its purpose, of course; now you had to
remember to bring the
ary 18, 2016 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
According to various rumour sources, there are a few reasons Apple is likely
to abandon the headset jack.
Thin iPhone - the iPhone is as thin as it can be currently. Apple likes thin
devices, and so do several 'people I have a
6, at 3:06 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
> wrote:
>
> Wut?
>
> LOL!
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "Sabahattin Gucukoglu"
> To: "'Chris Blouch' via MacVisionaries"
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 11:18 AM
>
Wut?
LOL!
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: "Sabahattin Gucukoglu"
To: "'Chris Blouch' via MacVisionaries"
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
On 18 Jan 2016, at 15:44, George Cassell wrote:
I came in
6 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
I came in a little late on this thread. Will somebody please tell me who is
the Democrat and who is the Republican in this debate?
On Jan 18, 2016, at 5:49 AM, 'onlineeagle' via MacVisionaries
wrote:
None of that
as going to use headphones, I'd
go the bluetooth route.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: "E.T."
To:
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Change is ever so very difficult yet change is exactly what brings
us to this point in
ctly functional, or stand in
>>>>>> line overnight to get that new Apple TV.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So Apple has very good reason for change. Its simple. People want
>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>&
have a lightning plug on the end,
like your charger, instead of the rounded 3.5M plug.
Chris.
- Original Message -
*From:* Kawal Gucukoglu <mailto:kgli...@icloud.com>
*To:* Macvisionaries <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 10:01 AM
;>>>> So Apple has very good reason for change. Its simple. People want
>>>>> change.
>>>>>
>>>>> From E.T.'s Keyboard...
>>>>> ancient.ali...@icloud.com
>>>>> Many believe that we have been visited
>>>>
new Apple TV.
>>>>>
>>>>> So Apple has very good reason for change. Its simple. People want
>>>>> change.
>>>>>
>>>>> From E.T.'s Keyboard...
>>>>> ancient.ali...@icloud.com
>>>>> Many b
I don’t suppose Activision will mind too terribly if you buy the Lost Treasures
app, then unpack it and extract the game data files, which you can then play in
Frotz. It would be the honest thing to do if you’ve paid for them.
But, honestly, these games have been so thoroughly treasured and loo
age -
*From:* Kawal Gucukoglu <mailto:kgli...@icloud.com>
*To:* Macvisionaries <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 10:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: Apple's headphone scam
Please could someone tell me how headphones could fit in a
lightening
Hmm, I’m not convinced that making the thinnest iPhone ever is their priority.
The newest iPhone is a tad thicker than the previous year and I personally
think that a better battery should be the priority over a thinner phone. That’s
just me though. I believe their are other waterproof phones on
And there is the Lost Treasures iOS app which was last updated in
2013 but last I read, it was not accessible.
From E.T.'s Keyboard...
ancient.ali...@icloud.com
Many believe that we have been visited
in the past. What if it were true?
On 1/18/2016 11:17 AM, 'Jason White' via MacVisionarie
E.T. wrote:
>Oh Zork! Is it still alive? I never got far in it but twas a neat text
> advcenture game.
If I remember correctly, it was made freely available by the current copyright
holder. You should be able to use it under OS X in the terminal with an
interpreter program such as Frotz, whi
According to various rumour sources, there are a few reasons Apple is likely to
abandon the headset jack.
Thin iPhone - the iPhone is as thin as it can be currently. Apple likes thin
devices, and so do several 'people I have asked. The jack needs to go for any
thinner to be possible.
Water res
ke your charger, instead of the rounded 3.5M plug.
Chris.
- Original Message -
*From:* Kawal Gucukoglu <mailto:kgli...@icloud.com>
*To:* Macvisionaries <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 10:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: Apple's
l, or stand in
>>>>> line overnight to get that new Apple TV.
>>>>>
>>>>> So Apple has very good reason for change. Its simple. People want
>>>>> change.
>>>>>
>>>>> From E.T.'s Keyboard...
>>>>>
I think the issue with Apple “Moving on” is that the consumer is never ready
for it. In a sense, that’s a testament to Apple’s forward-thinking approach,
but it also means that they are the first to draw the fire for having the
audacity to bring something to market without standardising it by c
ger, instead of the rounded 3.5M plug.
Chris.
- Original Message -
*From:* Kawal Gucukoglu <mailto:kgli...@icloud.com>
*To:* Macvisionaries <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 10:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: Apple's headphone scam
ry good reason for change. Its simple. People want
>>>> change.
>>>>
>>>> From E.T.'s Keyboard...
>>>> ancient.ali...@icloud.com
>>>> Many believe that we have been visited
>>>> in the past. What if it were tr
>> So Apple has very good reason for change. Its simple. People want
>>>> change.
>>>>
>>>> From E.T.'s Keyboard...
>>>> ancient.ali...@icloud.com
>>>> Many believe that we have been visited
>>>> in the past. What if it
Bottom line for me is that I trust apple. I have for years. They say if you are
an apple fan to never get too attached to anything because apple likes to
change things up. :) No company is perfect so I don’t expect perfection but I
do trust that if apple makes a change it will all be just fine.
the
end,
like your charger, instead of the rounded 3.5M plug.
Chris.
- Original Message -
*From:* Kawal Gucukoglu <mailto:kgli...@icloud.com>
*To:* Macvisionaries <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 10:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: Appl
.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 10:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: Apple's headphone scam
Please could someone tell me how headphones could fit in a
lightening adaptor? You mean there would be a different kind of
thing to put in a socket?
I don’t understand this headph
gt;
*To:* Macvisionaries <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 10:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: Apple's headphone scam
Please could someone tell me how headphones could fit in a
lightening adaptor? You mean there would be a different kind
On 18 Jan 2016, at 15:44, George Cassell wrote:
> I came in a little late on this thread. Will somebody please tell me who is
> the Democrat and who is the Republican in this debate?
Never mind that—where’s the link to Nazi Germany on this thread?
--
The following information is important for
I came in a little late on this thread. Will somebody please tell me who is
the Democrat and who is the Republican in this debate?
On Jan 18, 2016, at 5:49 AM, 'onlineeagle' via MacVisionaries
wrote:
> None of that explains why they have to abandon the headphone jack. Your point
> about the
Gucukoglu <mailto:kgli...@icloud.com>
*To:* Macvisionaries <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 10:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: Apple's headphone scam
Please could someone tell me how headphones could fit in a
lightening adaptor?
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Please could someone tell me how headphones could fit in a lightening
adaptor? You mean there would be a different kind of thing to put in a socket?
I don’t understand this headphone lightening connector thin
Please could someone tell me how headphones could fit in a lightening adaptor?
You mean there would be a different kind of thing to put in a socket?
I don’t understand this headphone lightening connector thing. When I sell my I
phones, I normally sell the headphones as well if they are still w
I’m afraid I just can’t quite bring myself to be sufficiently moved. I don’t
like planned obsolescence or proprietary standards either, but I’m also in the
market for a new pair of travel headphones, and I actually would love a digital
path between my iPhone and my headset. I was not among tho
s, which means more marketting
> by Apple, and more money for Apple.
>
> I'm just sayin'.
>
> Chris.
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Ray Foret Jr <mailto:rforet7...@comcast.net>
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com <mail
ies@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
None of that explains why they have to abandon the headphone jack. Your point
about the M4A encoding quality doesn't really address the issue, which is that
ITunes and Apple Music do not pr
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: Apple's headphone scam
Frankly, I think you are looking for a reason to abandin Apple anyway.
Sounds like it to me. I know that audio can both be received by the lightning
jack as well as send it out. Furthermore,
ter. Plug directly in,
which means new headphones for us, which means more marketting by Apple, and
more money for Apple.
I'm just sayin'.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Ray Foret Jr
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 6:17 AM
S
None of that explains why they have to abandon the headphone jack. Your point
about the M4A encoding quality doesn't really address the issue, which is that
ITunes and Apple Music do not provide as good audio quality as other providers.
Surely, you are own guessing Apple's reasons for implimenti
Frankly, I think you are looking for a reason to abandin Apple anyway. Sounds
like it to me. I know that audio can both be received by the lightning jack as
well as send it out. Furthermore, the lightning jack can render true 5.1
channel sound. Can your precious 3.5 MM jack do that? Of cou
Does seem like a cynical money making scheme. There's no reason why they can't
have both options. All this means is that potentially people are going to find
there old headphones redundant. If Apple provide lightning to headphone jack
adapters then maybe this won't be so bad, but Apple are prett
I would advise having nothing to do with this. You are overlooking an obvious
benefit; and it's not just more money for Apple: rather it's this. The plain
fact is that it's better to lose the headphone jack because you can get much
better audio out of the lightning connecter than you can out
95 matches
Mail list logo
