It's difficult to tell without seeing your deployment descriptor, but it
sounds like you're trying to use the PK class as a .
You should not be doing this. You should instead have s for
each of the fields in the PK. The only mention of the PK class in the
ejb-jar.xml should be the element.
I'
While that would work, you would have to create a separate jsp for each
document... really you should probably create your own servlet, map it
to *.doc in the same way, and use request.getPathInfo() and
request.getPathTranslated() (or just forward to the request to a URL in
a protected directory).
You should look in the Orion javadocs for DataSourceUserManager. Here's
an example of what to put in the orion-application.xml:
Note that you will also need to define your groups in principals.xml
(either the deployment version or the global version).
Good luck,
Jeff
se,
>it is Orion's
>>developers who call the shots.
>>
>>--peter
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Jeff Schnitzer
>>Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:06 AM
>>To: Ori
If I'm reading the steps correctly, this behavior is actually fully
spec-compliant. This is the reason I don't use FORM-based login.
j_security_check is only required to be valid immediately after an
attempt to visit a secured page. There is no provision to be able to
re-enter credentials from
You want to use the RoleManager:
Context ctx = new InitialContext();
RoleManager roleMan =
(RoleManager)ctx.lookup("java:comp/RoleManager");
try
{
roleMan.login(memberName, password);
}
catch (SecurityException ex)
{
return false;
}
return true;
-Original Message-
>From: Randahl Fink Isaksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>Question A: Are the ones of you who are using CMP 2.0 using
>version 1.4.4,
>1.4.5 or 1.4.7 of Orion?
I'm using 1.4.5 because 1.4.7 introduced a showstopper bug for me (fixed
in 1.4.8, whenver that happens). Bug #296.
>Question B: When
A side note:
In the current Orion release, you need to specify the action as
action="<%= request.encodeURL("/servlet/MyServlet") %>"
For some reason, Orion does not automatically rewrite action urls with
the session id like it does with other urls in pages. I've logged this
in Bugzilla.
It's
The J2EE sdk is not necessary, and probably should be removed. It is
the reference implementation of a J2EE server. You will be using Orion
instead.
Why aren't you using the 1.3 jdk?
Put the postgres jdbc driver in the orion/lib directory.
That should work :-)
Jeff
>-Original Message---
Bidirectional relationships do not yet work.
There are two workarounds that have worked for me:
Manually add (and remove!) both sides of the relationship. So your
Marketplace.addStorefront() method would look like this:
void addStorefront(Storefront front)
{
this.getStorefronts().add(f
I would like to see the documentation for the orion deployment
descriptors fleshed out. Right now it's sparse and choppy, with some
sentences just cut off in the middle. Verbose explanations with
examples would be a major improvement.
More than anything else, though, I think Orion needs a FAQ-O
Yes, this works, and is how I perform user authentication. It's not app
server portable though. :-(
Jeff
>-Original Message-
>From: Andre Vanha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 8:52 AM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: RE: Any way to "forward" to j_security_che
There are a number of posts in the archive about how to configure the
initial context (either programmatically or by using a jndi.properties
file). In addition to that:
Define a META-INF/application-client.xml and package it in the client's
jar.
Define the application client in the j2ee applicat
Unidirectional 1-1 and 1-n relationships between EJBs work, but
bidirectional relationships do not. There are easy ways to fake it,
though.
It's not strictly according to the specification - with Orion, you must
define the CMR fields as s in the . pd2 and pdf say
you shouldn't. This may have b
I frequently hear this mantra repeated, and while it is largely a good
idea, I have difficulty seeing why it should be adhered to dogmatically.
There is value in being able to define side-effects of setters and
getters or minimal bean-specific business logic. As a trivial example I
offer my Memb
Why not just put the superclass initialization in ejbCreate() and
require all the subclasses to call super.ejbCreate()?
Jeff
>-Original Message-
>From: Randahl Fink Isaksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:18 PM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: Best practices: H
>From: Joseph B. Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>Why do you say "pity?" (I'm assuming you don't mean "piety" here.) Why
>should it be open source? Do you think you can apply patches
>faster than
>the Orion team? (I don't think I could, nor do I think you
For me, the value of source is no
I'm not sure the same lessons apply; while still a small company by BEA
standards, Unify has a lot of mouths to feed. Other than 1999, it looks
like all of their years have been unprofitable, and 2000 was
dramatically so. They've been financing this with equity issues, but at
the current valuati
Kaffe is the Open Source implementation of Java that is shipped with
most flavors of Linux. It looks like the Kaffe version of the java
command is higher up in the path than the Sun JDK java command, thus you
are running the wrong JVM.
I suggest "rpm --erase kaffe". That should solve your probl
That's an interesting question. The investor story is not good - they
recently terminated their CEO/President and CFO, restated a year of
earnings (which put them in the red), and reduced their heacount from
132 to 106. Their stock, which was trading ~$20 this time last year, is
now at $0.31. N
>Dude, do you really think a Swedish company with a handful of employees
>is going to be able to field a worldwide army of training
>professionals?
It just occurred to me that this sounds rather bad... I was trying to
imply that it would be unlikely for such training professionals to be
sent al
Dude, do you really think a Swedish company with a handful of employees
is going to be able to field a worldwide army of training professionals?
My guess is that the entire world population of Orion experts is reading
this right now; depending on where you are, a nicely phrased request and
an offe
:
OpenEJB is the brainchild of Richard Monson-Haefel, author of
Enterprise JavaBeans, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly 2000). The core development
team for OpenEJB is Mr. Monson-Haefel and David Blevins.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schnitzer [ mailto:[EMAIL PROT
lso attached a much more complicted buildfile
("similarity"), which shows one ejb-jar, a main web-war, a test web-war,
two application clients, and a lot of rmi compiling (some using IIOP,
which requires a nightly build version of ant).
Enjoy :-)
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ServerTest.zip
JVM
(through packaging or http) so that the client can make "native"
database calls into the database? This would require making the
database publicly accessable and potentially adds complexity to the
client packaging, but it would be the best-performing solution.
Does the applicati
Are you sure that the JDBC driver isn't finding its way into the
classpath? Did you try the console remotely from a machine that you
know doesn't have the JDBC driver?
You may already know this, but just in case: Almost all of the orion
tools (including orionconsole.jar) are simply empty jar fi
I'm fully prepared to believe that my understanding of how this works is
wrong, but if so it raises quite a few questions for me.
Connection, Statement, ResultSet, etc are just interfaces; something
must implement them. Normally they are implemented by the JDBC driver,
thus allowing the client t
>From looking at the source, counter.jar only writes to the database for
every ten keys generated. With pessimistic concurrency, loads do not
occur for each use.
Here's the relevant code from CounterEJB.java:
public String ejbCreate(String name)
throws CreateException
{
t;Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 7:52 AM
>Subject: Re: Session EJB Accessibility
>
>
>> I believe Orion uses pessimistic concurrency control.
>However, I don't
>> think optimistic concurrency control would allow dirty re
>From: Mark Bernardinis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>> It seems like what you want is either a SLSB which never
>times out and
>> is guaranteed to only have one instance in the pool, or a BMP entity
>> bean with a guarantee of serialized transactions.
>>
>
>This is exactly what I want to do. Th
>From: Gary Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>I could use a little help here. My limited understanding of entity
>beans suggests that if I create an EB using a particular
>key value, as long as I refer only to that same key value there
>would only be one instance of the EB. Is that not true bec
he list - if you would like to continue
>the discussion, please reply to my personal address.
>
>Thanks for your thoughts.
>
>I appreciate your point of view, I just disagree with it.
>
>Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
>>
>> If the client is going to use the JDBC driver, it must b
I'm confused by your comments; does it need to manage state, or doesn't
it? I'm assuming it does, otherwise you would just use a stateless
session bean.
Here's some fodder for conversation:
I don't think there is an EJB facility which will help you. SLSBs are
pooled and can timeout, SFSBs have
If the client is going to use the JDBC driver, it must be able to load
the class(es). This means you need to package the driver with the
client application. I'm puzzled by your comments about clients not
needing to care about drivers - are these classes just going to
materialize out of thin air?
Has anyone else noticed that 1.4.5 seems to neglect changes made to the
ejb-jar? It unpacks the ear and deploys changed war files just fine,
and if I change the ejb-jar.xml, it will unpack the ejb jar. But if I
change only the ejb class files, Orion just upacks the ear and sits.
Even restarting
I've found that it's pretty hard to beat Hypersonic for development.
The only caveat is that you need to run it in "server mode" in order to
get concurrent access to the database; otherwise the database files are
locked by Orion and you can't see what's going on.
As far as Interbase goes, there i
ncing something like this, I'm sure
the added comments would be helpful :-)
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel Cardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 4:44 AM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: RE: E_Roman e-commer
Me too. Not only are the joins expensive, but it's a lot of extra data,
too. My database is already key-heavy without the extra tables.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Dumitru Sbenghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 8:04 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: O/R
The extra table is definately unnecessary, and hopefully it will go away
in a future version of Orion. Take a look at bug #209 in Bugzilla.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001
l with with
a dependency graph this incestuous before. My build process has always
looked like the way you would set up a C++ project, mostly out of habit.
I'd like to know if I'm pointed in the right direction before I wreck my
CVS tree :-)
Thanks,
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is it really necessary to have your own user manager?
I model my users as entity EJBs. I use the vanilla
DataSourceUserManager mapped to the same table that the entities are
written to. All manipulation of user data is done through the entity
beans. The only trick is that you need to set:
I believe some browsers don't issue a referrer header.
You could always store the page history in the http session. At the top
of every JSP (using an @include or custom tag) you could have code like
this:
<%
String lastPage = session.getAttribute("lastPage");
String currURL;
You could put in the default.jsp.
Jeff
>-Original Message-
>From: Johnson, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 8:52 PM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: Best way to redirect root "/" URL to servlet with parameters
>
>
>Is there an easy way with orion to redir
Just a thought, but have you checked the system clocks on the various
machines involved? Maybe the timestamps are fouled.
"reloading" of JSPs works fine for me; my deployment process just copies
the new .ear over the old one.
Jeff
>-Original Message-
>From: Ozzie Gurkan [mailto:[EMAIL
at crap this is (yes I'm a little bitter). My modifications
are labeled with my name (Jeff Schnitzer).
This modification may or may not be necessary for you; it's obvious from
reading the mailing list (and the code) that nobody working on the JDBC
driver has any clue what PostgreSQL is
Have you successfully installed the sample junitee test in the JUnitEE
tutorial?
You shouldn't need to modify the global application.xml. Here's how my
system is set up, given that my ear contains two wars, "similarity-web"
and "similarity-test-web" (which contains my TestServlet and JUnit
tests
>From: Darren Pamatat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>I like the layout of the complex-or example more so
>than the orion-cmp primer, because it is not required
>to jar it up, and classes can just be recompiled, and
>run (if only I could run something against it). Also,
>what is the difference in th
Out of curiosity, why do you have so much logic in servlets that you
need to test them? Is your page transition logic that complicated?
I have found that by keeping all my business logic in session beans
(which are tested with JUnitEE, http://www.infohazard.org/junitee), my
servlets/JSPs stay pr
o look like they weren't
captured from VHS tape.
There is also an AWT replacement called Pure Java AWT from
www.eteks.com, but I'm scared of it. That their website is in French
only amplifies my terror. Has anyone succesfully used it with JDK1.3?
Gr.
I feel better now. At least,
I've attached a buildfile (not the orion-primer buildfile).
I wanted the source to mirror the jar file structure (I think this is
less confusing) and I didn't like the proliferation of dependencies in
the orion-primer example. This is the result.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL
ing nevertheless.
Has anyone else experienced anything like this? Since the problem shows
up intermittently, hunting it down is a real pain. I don't know if it's
a bug with partial-false, CMR fields as keys, compound keys, or only
when all three are put together :-)
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTE
I'm not sure I'm reading your message correctly. Do you want to know
how to initialize a radio button value?
You use the "checked" attribute in the tag:
/>
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-Original Message-
>From: Kemp Randy-W1
re the scene: somebody mistakenly deploys a
mangled deployment descriptor, and the app server promptly sees fit to
drop half the tables in the production database. Hey, it worked in the
test system! :-)
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
An interesting graph can be found here:
http://uptime.netcraft.com/graph?display=uptime&site=www.orionserver.com
(sorry about the previous chopped message)
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-Original Message-
>From: Scott Stirling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednes
An interesting graph can be found here:
>-Original Message-
>From: Scott Stirling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 9:02 PM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: RE: www.orionserver.com down again
>
>
>That's because it was put back up in the interim. I've noticed t
e bean instance.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-Original Message-
>From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 4:15 PM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: Orion JSP form validation and redisplay...
>
>
>Hello,
>
>Does orion have
tc to the test case - although
why that would be useful is somewhat of a mystery to me, since IMHO
important logic should all be in EJBs :-)
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-Original Message-
>From: Jason Rimmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 12:13
o((Foo)ejbContext.getEJBObject());
}
catch (java.rmi.RemoteException ex)
{
throw new EJBException(ex);
}
}
Of course you get data duplication in the database, but it works :-)
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-Original Message-
>From: Tim D
Does this mean that all the java packages will be renamed from
com.evermind.* to com.ironflare.* ? :-)
Jeff
>From: Karl Avedal
>Subject: Re: Anyone heard from evermind?
>Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 04:15:49 -0800
>
>Hello,
>I thought it was time for some explanation on our silence.
>
>Alot of thi
I have generally found that a ClassCastException (usually nested
three-layers deep in ominous sounding Orion exceptions) usually
indicates a wrong bean (or class) specified in the deployment
descriptor.
For instance, I was tearing my hair out over a ClassCastException I was
getting every time I t
Jeff
>-Original Message-
>From: James Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 7:08 AM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: Re: Changing Orion Generated SQL
>
>
>[Jeff Schnitzer]
>> Take a look at the documentation for orion-ejb-jar.xml. It's a
e server.
More than likely, though, you have something misspecified in your
deployment descriptor. Make sure you read the comments in Sun's EJB2.0
DTD thoroughly.
If this doesn't help, you can try posting your deployment descriptor.
Good luck,
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Take a look at the documentation for orion-ejb-jar.xml. It's a lot
easier if you have a few samples to look at alongside.
http://www.orionserver.com/docs/orion-ejb-jar.xml.html
What changes you have in mind?
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-Original Message-
>From:
of the stateful session bean would
pretty much follow the HttpSession (eliminating the problem anyways).
Another approach might be to do no extra checking and just simply
recreate the stateful session in the error page (if the error is
java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException). H that would be annoyi
a good discussion of one other approach; you
can also implement your own UserManager if you choose. I don't use the
principals.xml; my users are defined by "Member" entity beans and I
simply layer the DataSourceUserManager over the appropriate entity
table. There are many other ways of addressing this issue as well.
Good luck!
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to happen if they get many more comments.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, there is nothing wrong with MS SQL Server and Win2K. As someone
who is not a professional DBA and has no desire to become one (I like
building things, not maintaining tempermenal third-party software
systems), I find that SQL Server is by far the most pleasant of the big
relational databases
d rather we enter this kind of stuff in Bugzilla or just leave it
alone and wait. Maybe a separate category should be set up for EJB2.0
bugs?
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: John D'Ausilio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 200
says that the
primary key must be set by the end of ejbCreate(), but that CMR fields
must not be modified until ejbPostCreate(). If a CMR field is the
primary key, we seem to have a catch-22 problem...
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Archer [m
ed in EJB2.0 CMR has got to be pretty
obscure. I've got some pretty wacky relationships and it all works
reasonably well.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Cory Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 12:11 AM
to
the system, but the web-application tag doesn't seem to be
implemented yet. So I want to give a limited security role to "guest".
Heeelp!
Thanks,
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, you don't need to specify the new DOCTYPE. I haven't, and I'm
making extensive use of EJB2.0 beans.
Tim, you probably are missing something important in the deployment
descriptor. It's hard to say what without seeing it. Do you have
2.x
in your block? You should post your descriptor
David Kenzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] said:
>
> IMO, the mailing list is just fine. If there are too many
> messages for your
> inbox, then you should filter it away. All the popular mail
> clients will
> handle this.
>
> [...]
I would like to add another voice to this opinion; I don't thin
agnus for the taglibs tutorial,
it's *much* more useful than the chapter in the Wrox JSP book.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
agnus for the taglibs tutorial,
it's *much* more useful than the chapter in the Wrox JSP book.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
zilla :-)
Good luck,
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 1:54 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Cc: Jeff Schnitzer
> Subject: RE: Please help! I get null pointer exception after calling
> createonan EB wi
Unless you have some especially complicated logic for authenticating
users, you might want to simply use the DataSourceUserManager.
Search the list archive for "DataSourceUserManager" and you'll find a
pretty good discussion of UserManagers.
I set this up last weekend. Users in my system are re
I have had no problems creating CMP entity beans from session beans with
EJB2.0. Seems to work as advertsied :-)
I suggest posting your code and descriptors; I'll take a look, and the
more examples of EJB2.0 beans floating around the better :-)
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Arc
the zipfile.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Greg Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 11:11 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: userThreads + calling EJBs from outside orion.
i'm trying to create a do
It's in Chapter 21 of the EJB2.0 Public Draft. Sun has not released the
DTD in any other form, and isn't planning to until the final version of
the spec. At least, that's what the two architects who are writing the
spec said in the (way too short) chat Sun hosted a couple weeks ago.
Has a
/junitee>
The tutorial may be a little rough; comments and suggestions are always
welcome.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
a or just assume that
the authors are busily working on this very problem and don't need yet
another monkey on their backs? :-)
Is anyone else working with EJB2.0 beans?
Thanks,
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
World article).
For anyone else interested, here's a link to the JavaWorld article:
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/javatips/jw-javatip91.html
Thanks,
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: wim veninga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, Septemb
is it
something that Sun needs to take care of?
For the moment I suppose I can rip the class file out of ejb.jar and add
my own EJBException.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ests?), and the output is
a lot more attractive :-) I would also like to enhance it with any
features that anyone thinks might be useful for unit testing EJBs, so
I'm open to any suggestions!
Later,
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
azard.org/junitee
>< http://www.infohazard.org/junitee>
great, but the link seems to be wrong. could you check?
robert
>
>Enjoy :-)
>
>Jeff Schnitzer
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] <
es a small Ant buildfile for anyone that is interested.
You can find it at http://www.infohazard.org/junitee
<http://www.infohazard.org/junitee>
Enjoy :-)
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I apologize if anyone is receiving this twice. It looks
Doesn't the use of the Address dependent object in the Person remote
interface violate section 9.4.11 of the EJB2.0 spec? Specifically:
-
The Bean Provider must not expose the dependent object classes or the
persistent Collection classes that are used in container managed
relationships throu
nonexistant? I can't
seem to find anything in the EJB spec which says one way or another.
What defines the user/group of the unauthenticated client? The stock
principals.xml implies that it is a user named "anonymous", but this
doesn't seem to work. Is this a bug? Do I
of role "users" to group "users". The master
principals.xml has both "anonymous" and "guest" as users which belong to
the "users" group.
Both the atm and news demos work fine. I presume it is because they
explicitly authenticate somewhere in code, but I haven't been able to
figure out how or why.
Help? :-)
Thanks,
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
101 - 190 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
