RE: [PHP-DEV] Moderate PHP-DEV

We'll see who reads this, any responses are welcome. I see a few different issues here: 1) People who want answers for a php-general message post it to the development forum. This is clearly because they do not understand the difference, as I doubt anyone wants to waste their own time posting a

[PHP-DEV] Error_log

Is there any reason we are still supporting PHP3 for error_log? Specifically that TCP/IP stuff. I was looking at error_log and I was wondering if anyone had a good objection to me submitting a patch for it to: define constants ERRORLOG_SYSLOG, ERRORLOG_EMAIL, ERRORLOG_FILE .. It's really ugly

RE: [PHP-DEV] Doing something with an each opcode as zend_execute() handles it

>Such as overriding the opcode handlers for each opcode? I >suppose I could change what the handlers are initialized to in >zend_init_opcodes_handler() so that my new handler does the >serialization and then calls the regular handler. Does that make sense? Yep Int my_do_fetch_r_handler(ZEND_O

RE: [PHP-DEV] Doing something with an each opcode as zend_execute() handles it

Look at zend_init_opcodes_handlers() and the zend_opcode_handler array.. John >-Original Message- >From: George Schlossnagle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 6:10 PM >To: David Sklar >Cc: Sterling Hughes; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Doing someth

[PHP-DEV] Question about zend_compile

I'm playing around with the compiler/executor and I was wondering if someone could answer a question.. Is there any reasonable way to essentially push/pop the function table? What I'd like to do is get a function_table hash for only a single file (pesudo code below): PUSH_FUNCTION_TABLE(CG(func

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: new construct

I was asking myself -- I had assumed that __construct() would be searched for first. I was /am under the impression __construct() is a special function that the engine wouldn't allow you to use in PHP5 in any other context than its intended purpose. I don't know what Zeev plans on doing with th

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: new construct

>__construct is the new method of defining a constructor, but >the 'bug' you suspect is not a bug. The parser will search >for a function of the same name in the class as the >constructor for backwards compatibility with Older scripts, etc... But shouldn't __construct() be searched for and us

RE: [PHP-DEV] Weird PHP5 APXS libtools errors

> $ export SED=sed > $ ./configure ... > >Somehow, the variable SED is not set. I was just looking at the MakeFile trying to figure this out and I was thinking it must be something like that. It works now -- thanks... But why would SED suddenly stop being defined? Did I break somethi

RE: [PHP-DEV] Weird PHP5 APXS libtools errors

>Does a snapshot from snaps.php.net compile without running ./buildconf? Yep it does, actually... I'll investigate further into it when I get some sleep :) John -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] Weird PHP5 APXS libtools errors

>>upgrade your libtool to 1.4.3, it is required now. [user@localhost php5]# ./buildconf using default Zend directory buildconf: checking installation... buildconf: autoconf version 2.13 (ok) buildconf: automake version 1.4-p5 (ok) buildconf: libtool version 1.4.3 (ok) And just to be sure.. [user

[PHP-DEV] Weird PHP5 APXS libtools errors

>From HEAD: ./configure works fine (no options)... Make, everything. But... ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs Causes some weirdness on Make... [user@localhost]# make /bin/sh libtool --preserve-dup-deps --mode=compile gcc -I/home/php/php5/ext/mysql/libmysql -Iext/mysql/ -I/home/

[PHP-DEV] Segfault with ZE2

I'll file a bug report on this, but I wasn't sure if it would get noticed and figured those involved might be interested... As of the CVS from last Monday (as well as head) ZE2 is segfaulting... Here's the bt.. #0 0x081114b4 in zend_register_functions (scope=0x0, functions=0x4001a260, functi

RE: [PHP-DEV] RfC: version names

>That can be done, but that means 12 commits "a day" for a >single file. I >dont think that's a good idea. Is there some way we can harness CVS keyword subsitutuion in a case like this? John -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/un

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: str_ireplace vs. stri_replace

If your using an undocumented parameter, and that undocumented parameter changes what's the problem? The documentation doesn't say a word about a mystery undocumented parameter... I don't think we should be too concerned with someone using something they arguably shouldn't be. John >-Origin

RE: [PHP-DEV] roadmap of PHP - where? PHP 5 - when?

The reason I ask is that Shane Caraveo and I were working on the thread saftey issue, but we couldn't talk about it because we weren't invited to the PHP5-DEV list >-Original Message- >From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 5:51 AM >To: Piotr So

RE: [PHP-DEV] roadmap of PHP - where? PHP 5 - when?

I am working on some reader-friendly docs to answer this question, but for now you can read the ZEND_CHANGES file in the PHP CVS John >-Original Message- >From: Piotr Sobolewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 5:41 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PHP-D

RE: [PHP-DEV] foreach nastiness with references (bug #21702)

Ah, I understand now... This perhaps in a documentation problem then after all, as there is no way to change this behavior cleanly that I can see... What about making a copy of the array and all of the references associated with that array instead of just using the real array? Just a thought. Jo

RE: [PHP-DEV] foreach nastiness with references (bug #21702)

To answer part of your question: >One more thing: whether this bug is fixed or not, the >documentation must >be clarified! I don't know about you, but I simply don't >understand what >it's supposed to say. Quoting: "Note: Also note that foreach operates What the documentation means is that

RE: [PHP-DEV] Overloading object methods

>I'm asking how to call parent::method() from zend engine (C), >not from php. >Are questions regarding the C zend_engine API welcome? Ah. My appologies then -- I misunderstood your question. Yes, questions regarding development _of_ PHP/Zend Engine are welcome here :) At first (and second) read

RE: [PHP-DEV] Overloading object methods

This list is for the development _of_ PHP not _with_ PHP, please direct future questions there However, I don't understand the question you are asking... If you have this: Class A { function foo() { echo "I am function foo"; } } Class B extends A {

RE: [PHP-DEV] Generic expressions interpolation in strings

In order for such a feature to exist the your statement would have to be (ignoring the ++ operator for now): $foo = "The count is: {$count = $count + 1}"; Which means that you'd actually have to evaluate everything inside of { } as PHP code.. Although the language should be able to accomidate th

[PHP-DEV] ZE2, Win32, and PHP5

Is anyone already building Win32 ZE2/PHP executables? I'm planning on moving all of my development machines over to the ZE2 engine, but I don't have MSVC handy for my Windows box. On that note -- Someone before mentioned that we should start building the source exclusively using ZE2 (for developm

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP in 2003 (leading to PHP 5)

I tend to agree that completely separating PHP from the modules does cause a problem when it comes to support modules, etc. However, IMHO I feel that as the numbers of modules written for PHP increases there becomes a greater and greater need to separate modules from the core of PHP. When it comes

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: hitcho

Perhaps we should try to get documentation for those functions which don't have anything before we worry about trying to go through and add more examples for those that do? John >-Original Message- >From: Tularis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 5:20 PM >To:

[PHP-DEV] Yet another happy new year :)

With 4.3.0 out the door, I just wanted to take a moment and join the chourus and say Happy new year as well. Peace and happiness to all, and I'll be sure to throw one back for the success of PHP as well ;) John -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http:/

RE: [PHP-DEV] Update: Quoting behaviour exposed

Nah. Can we please put down the swords and start talking about PHP5? >-Original Message- >From: Sascha Schumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 12:47 PM >To: Zeev Suraski >Cc: Sebastian Bergmann; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Update: Quotin

RE: [PHP-DEV] Sessions, session_register()

>The problem stems from the fact that some users have been >(ab)using session_register when register_globals is off. >session_register is only supposed to be used for the >register_globals=on case. Those functions need to be updated in the manual then to reflect this change. If I s

RE: [PHP-DEV] Sessions, session_register()

>php_error(E_WARNING, "Your script possibly relies on a >session side-effect which existed until PHP 4.2.3. Please be >advised that the session extension does not consider global >variables as a source of data, unless register_globals is >enabled. You can disable this functionality and thi

RE: [PHP-DEV] Sessions, session_register()

>Where did you find that recommendation? http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.session-register.php Read the note :) I thought it was kind of strange myself... If this is changed in 4.3 I will update the docs to reflect this, but I wanted to see what everyone had to say about it first. John

[PHP-DEV] Sessions, session_register()

Can someone enlighten me as to why session_register() and $_SESSION shouldn't be used togeather? It seems to me the session_register() function(s) should just be working with $_SESSION anyway... Are they doing something different? Is this desired behavior if it is doing something different? John

RE: [PHP-DEV] php-cgi vs php-cli naming issue

>I see that renaming the CGI to php-cgi might break things indeed, and >that's never a good idea. But so is changing the name of the CLI (php) >to something else. It also breaks things, not only for me, but >also for >countless others using the CLI with the name 'php'. We also need to >think a

RE: [PHP-DEV] downgrade undefined function from fatal error

There is absolutely no reason why you cannot simply include your functions in your scripts. If you are really lazy, you can even auto_prepend an include file. John >-Original Message- >From: Dave [Hawk-Systems] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 8:56 AM >To: [E

RE: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

Esp. when some of us would love to see PHP5 start taking form :) John >-Original Message- >From: Leon Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 2:55 PM >To: Edin Kadribasic >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe > > >> P.S. I wi

RE: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

>Please mention the name change at least in the NEWS file and >maybe php-cli could even output a readable error when beeing >called as cgi. As I already said, we should put this in the message created at the end of ./configure, in the release notes, in the news file, on the website, and perhaps

RE: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

> >Maybe phpsh would be a good idea for the name of the CLI? It wouldn't >confuse ppl as much as php-cli > Why when I look at "phpsh" I think "Sushi"... John -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

As much as I understand the point of view that renaming the CGI version of PHP from php(.exe) to php-cgi(.exe) so that we don't have to type 'php-cli' perhaps isn't such a good idea, I am completely against changing it now. Changing it the first time is obviously causing problems, changing it agai

RE: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

istory of this and the problems >one will see when trying to run php.exe as a cgi (i.e. >follows one of the many install texts out there). > >This is _sorta_ documented but not really, only the >apache2 docs make any mention of it thus far. > >Regards, >Philip > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

>Yes that could happen...maybe we should have another *big* >message for the configure part and a *huge* message in the >release notes and news entries. This is no different than when register_globals suddenly got turned off. I think a big ole' message at the end of ./configure will drastically

RE: [PHP-DEV] FR: echo line

-1, no way... >-Original Message- >From: Jari Vuoksenranta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 11:57 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PHP-DEV] FR: echo line > > >I have a feature request: I'd like to have '#' comment like >macro which would expand "_ foo" t

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Cookie Session Problem

> You can turn it off by setting "session.use_trans_sid" parameter > to off (btw, it is off by default). You really should use the session.use_only_cookies directive. John >Bye, >Ivan > > >-- >PHP Development Mailing List >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/uns

RE: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

For what it's worth, I am in agreement with Derick... Consistency is important.. Besides... A rose is still a rose, even if it's called sweet_smelling_flower ;) >OK, I will admit the '_' is then OK, but I rather do not use >it in this case, since I would like to use that for a more >session

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-DOC] #20822 [Com]: getimagesize() returning null instead of false

>The return false part is ok but why not showing the warnings >from fopen? Well, the issue here is in the bugreport... It's not an issue of PHP throwing a warning when a file doesn't exist and is attempted to be opened, but it was throwing the error if the filesize was zero.. I could see that be

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-DOC] #20822 [Com]: getimagesize() returning null instead of false

long(return_value, 0, result->width); add_index_long(return_value, 1, result->height); >-Original Message- >From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:39 AM >To: John Coggeshall >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAI

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-DOC] #20822 [Com]: getimagesize() returning null instead of false

I've changed the getimagesize() function so that it RETURN_FALSE on every error, and disables the error reporting if the file fails to open (it still returns RETURN_FALSE) If no one has a problem, I'll commit. John >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names

+1 >-Original Message- >From: Ilia A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:23 PM >To: Derick Rethans; PHP Developers Mailing List >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names > > >Consistency is always good and adding aliases for newly added >functions see

RE: [PHP-DEV] pecl extensions

> Yeah I know that shady guy Shane. Heh. He is shady, isn't he? ;) > Well, it's defintly experimental. There are bindings for >opengl and glut. You can run some sample apps that use the >glut api. Its pretty cool. Me and Marcus were working on off >screen redndering with OSMesa. That would all

RE: [PHP-DEV] pecl extensions

Brad: I'm going to take a real stab in the dark here and say that you know Shane Caraveo. I was at PHPCon with him presenting in October and I was talking about an idea I had to implement opengl in PHP... He said that someone by the name of Brad (at least, that's what I recall) was working on a e

[PHP-DEV] Hashtables

Hey all I was playing around and I'm running into a problem with a hashtable... Basically, it's segfaulting my code :) Specifically, I'm trying to return the number of items in the hash... if(zend_hash_num_elements(hash) == 0) Which causes the following: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmen

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #2965

>I'm conflicted on this one. On the one hand you've got PHP >somewhat at fault for treating letters as special characters >(such that 'Z'+1 == 'AA') rather than as their ordinal >equivalents (such that 'Z'+1 == ord('Z')+1 == 91 == ord('[') >== '[' ) which IMO is an ugly thing. I personally li

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #2965

ginal Message- >From: Dan Rossi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 7:06 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #2965 > > >i'd try use chr($i) or something like that and start @ A value > >-Origina

[PHP-DEV] Bug #2965

This bug was changed to a documentation problem, and I'm a bit confused as to what exactly the issue is For($i = 'A'; $i <= 'Z' $i++) echo $i; I'm assuming this *should* echo the A-Z alphabet (which it doesn't).. But, since it was changed to a documentation problem -- is the current form in

[PHP-DEV] Bug #2965

This bug was changed to a documentation problem, and I'm a bit confused as to what exactly the issue is For($i = 'A'; $i <= 'Z' $i++) echo $i; I'm assuming this *should* echo the A-Z alphabet (which it doesn't).. But, since it was changed to a documentation problem -- is the current form in

RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel

a week about this sort of thing, so >clearly there >is interest. It seems that everyone who emails me is looking >to do it on >either a personal basis or for some proprietary extension, so >it's not like >PHP itself would suddenly become "polluted" with C++.

RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel

AFAIK, PHP is designed to function on any standard ANSI-compatible C compiler (as a goal). Unless this has changed, I don't know if opening the door for C++ development is the best of ideas (IMHO) John >-Original Message- >From: J Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, Novem

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP Memory Error

>67108860 bytes = 64 mb 64M will also work, I believe. John > > >"Jonathan Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Could someone >please help. Running Linux 7.3 RH with 512 MB Ram with >> Apache and PHP 4. I receive the following err

RE: [PHP-DEV] Redirect patch URL

ilip > >On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, John Coggeshall wrote: > >> >> http://coogle.homeip.net:81/php/patches/error_redirect.txt >> >> John >> >> >-Original Message- >> >From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >Sent: Tuesday,

RE: [PHP-DEV] Redirect patch URL

http://coogle.homeip.net:81/php/patches/error_redirect.txt John >-Original Message- >From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:22 PM >To: John Coggeshall >Cc: 'PHP Developers Mailing List' >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re

[PHP-DEV] Redirect patch URL

>Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:00 PM >To: John Coggeshall >Cc: 'Sterling Hughes'; 'Ivan Ristic'; 'James Aylett'; 'PHP >Developers Mailing List' >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Redirect on Error (not localisation) > > > > >"Jo

RE: [PHP-DEV] Redirect on Error (not localisation)

My bad then :) I was under the impression that we had moved passed this and no one had a real issue with it. I'll hold off on it then. John >-Original Message- >From: Sterling Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:18 PM >To: John Cogg

RE: [PHP-DEV] Redirect on Error (not localisation)

Unless told otherwise, I'm already planning on making a few changes and committing. John >-Original Message- >From: Ivan Ristic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:50 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: 'James Aylett'; 'PHP Developers Mailing List' >Subject: [PHP-

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

Alrighty :) I'm not going to force-feed localization down anyone's throat myself, and since there are some who seem almost pissed at the idea... Well :) Looks like there's just not a need for it. Anyway... So what of my actual patch we were discussing at some point? I never got a real answer as

RE: [PHP-DEV] Error Codes, Langs, etc

Maxim (and anyone else who is interested) Shall we try to get a patch for this working then? I'm thinking perhaps starting off with an XML file defining the error messages, which is converted to a cdb for actual use. Anyone else game? John >-Original Message- >From: Sascha Schumann [

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

>Nearly any singular operation is fast, the question is what >happens when it is >done often. For a database stored on disk we are talking at >least 2-3 drive >seeks + reading of meta information at the start of the >database. While it >may be negligible for a single process it does add up.

RE: [PHP-DEV] Error Codes, Langs, etc

>I had wanted to avoid this whole thread, but decided to read this one >message, and ouch. While I'm all for internationalization in general, >I'm realy not all for using xml wherever possible just because it can >be. There are existing techniques and libraries designed for >this, find >one

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

>Because errors need to be loaded into memory by some >mechanism, stored in a >hash table? Meaning that during startup I will be penalized >for this process. >Hash table has it own overhead as well meaning that PHP memory >usage will >increase, for a server running 200-300 apache children >c

RE: [PHP-DEV] Error Codes, Langs, etc

>I am definitely -1 for this idea. XML is a buzzword, it is >good in some cases >not so good in others, definitely not a one size fits all >solution. In PHP's >case it would add decency on an XML parser, make life of >developers adding, >modifying, removing error messages difficult and just l

[PHP-DEV] Error Codes, Langs, etc

Wow.. Alrighty... I've read through all of this stuff -- everyone seems to have quite a strong opinion on this one :) Since I kinda brought it up with Maxim, let me provide a concept of implementation and defend it... I'd of course love to hear what you guys have to say... I am completely +1 to

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

>Multi-lingual error codes open's up pandora's box, let's not go >there. I have to disagree with you here Sterling. Worrying about support for non-english errors in php-general, etc is a bad, bad excuse not to implement them. The benefits of a completely constant-based error system (with human-f

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

>[1] The annoying thing is that FATAL errors can't be handled >by an error >handler With the patch they can be handled without any issues. > I don't like the 500 way either, because you simply loose >the entire >environment > the bug occured in. You'll lose the entire environment i

RE: [PHP-DEV] error reporting for PHP5

I've been cut off from my e-mail since Thursday, so I'm going to have to play catch-up a little here... Issue #1: Maxim's Error handling suggestions I completely agree with the concept of language-specific errors. I'll be happy to implement a system on that. However before we do that I think wh

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

hurt anyone and makes it That much more efficient. >marcus > >At 12:56 21.11.2002, John Coggeshall wrote: > >>Okay... >> >>Well, even though I've yet to convince Derick and a few >others... I did >>see enough interest in this to create a patch. This c

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

ror -- perl, cgi, mod_include, etc all do >> it, so why shouldn't php? >> >> -- james >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: John Coggeshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:06 PM >> > To: 'Jame

[PHP-DEV] Windows Threads

Shane (and everyone else): >Why don't we move PHP into a separate executable. Design a >"thin" ISAPI DLL which purely passes the data which the ISAPI >DLL exposes between the IIS process and the PHP process (or >process-pool for added reliability). The resulting page is >processed in the app

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

Okay... Well, even though I've yet to convince Derick and a few others... I did see enough interest in this to create a patch. This creates two new directives: error_redirect (bool) which turns this on/off, and error_redirect_url (string) which is the URL to redirect to upon error. In order for t

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

>Who cares? :) It really would be much better if some person >who thinks >IIS rulez fixes the ISAPI module. If that doesn't work >correctly nobody >should use it at all. I'm not saying I'm a IIS fan. :) I rather implement one solution Which works, period. IMHO that's better than have differen

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

> >If ErrorDocument is implemented as a sub-request in Apache, it >would be >enough for PHP to set one or more Apache notes with the necessary >information. Again, what about IIS, etc? John -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsu

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

t flexablity to deal with any error PHP is going to throw at a user without breaking old code. Please RFC of course :) John >-Original Message- >From: Chris Shiflett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:31 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

don't think PHP can say "turn this into a 500 error" to Apache. John > > -- james > >> -Original Message- >> From: John Coggeshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:48 PM >> To: 'James Cox'

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

|>And how about that we change PHP so that it changes |>the status of the response to 500 on a fatal error? Then |>you would be able to use the Apache directive |> |>ErrorDocument 500 /handle-my-errors.php |> |>to deal with them. You would have to use output buffering, |>o

RE: [PHP-DEV] Just a little question (sidenote)

On a sidenote, is it possible in Zend to implmement something such as: $string = "Foobar"; $string = &$string[1]; I actually thought that would work, however upon testing it throws an error... Just curious. John -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: htt

[PHP-DEV] Error Handler

Did we ever come to some sort of agreement on the error handler thing? I'd like to maybe look into working on maybe putting together the redirect-on-error system we discussed (implementing a new directive which if set will re-direct the user to another web page if PHP errors out). Someone grun

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

>> http://somewhere.com/error.php?errno=4";); ?> > >> This way, users who don't care can still re-direct a browser >to a nice >> and pretty "sorry, the server is really screwed" HTML page... Or, if >> they'd like, they can simply take that error number and create a >> error-handler in PHP witho

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

>hmm, I really thought we didn't have one, as it doesn't make sense at >all :) Ha! I'm not crazy! :) >>Having a solid way to >> gracefully bow-out because my cat managed to open, fill with >junk, and >> save a critical include file would just be nice. The choice between >> the blank screen,

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

>uhm, John, we dont have a E_PARSE yet. It's late... I actually stared at that sentence for about 30 seconds trying to determine if I had spelled PARSE wrong... Then I actually went and checked the manual to make sure I hadn't lost my mind and there was actually a E_PARSE constant... Now I'm just

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

>> Can't argue with that, however (;)), I find it annoying that >PHP stops >> processing if there is a parse error passed to an eval() >command. I'd >> like a way to make eval() just return E_PARSE if the script >passed to >> it fails. This is exactly the type of situation where E_PARSE real

FW: [PHP-DEV] error handling

This is what I sent Derick about a possible method of implementing a custom error handler for E_PARSE, etc... Free to flame if I'm off base here :) >-Original Message- >From: John Coggeshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 3:52 AM >To

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

>Both? I'm not totally sure what you mean with "when the custom error >handler also has errors". Can you elaborate? Okay Which would output something like this: Error: There was an parse error on line X of file.php. Additional Error: Custom error handler myerrorhandler() also errored in l

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

|And this can never be supported safely, as a parse error leaves the |parse in an unstable state. Also, I really don't think that we should |try to add hacks to make this possible. Is this directed toward my wish (of having a secondary error if the custom error handler also errors) or toward Ma

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

|I know this is possible now, but not within the error handling |function of PHP, or without setting a custom error handler. Well, it's not really possible now -- a E_PARSE won't get thrown to a custom PHP handler, it'll just die with a parse error. If there is an improvement to be made, perha

[PHP-DEV] Re: php4 / configure.in /main php_version.h

|What is left to do to get 4.3.0 out the door? Anyone have any |sort of list or idea Of where things need to be polished/cleaned up? I meant of course beyond the little TODO already posted :) John -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: php4 / configure.in /main php_version.h

|I thought we're going with 5.0.0 after 4.3.0? Obviously we'd |maintain the |4.3.0 branch and continue to release bug fix releases. Or do |you think we |should wait for 4.3.1? I'm a bit concerned about 5.0 lingering for too |long. You can see how 4.3 has lingered. I was under the impression

RE: [PHP-DEV] show_source()

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] show_source() | | |I would actually love to see that :) | | |"John Coggeshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message |news:000701c28c5e$ac9cb200$9d10fea9@;coogle... | |If no one has an objection, I'll look into making some of that happ

[PHP-DEV] CVS Daily??

I haven't received a CVS Daily report in a couple of days... Something broken? John -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] show_source()

If no one has an objection, I'll look into making some of that happen. John |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nicos@;php.net] |Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:15 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [PHP-DEV] show_source() | | |Hello, | |Some users are reques

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.3 ToDo

| >* Make all extensions thread-safe. | |lol: How do we know that? Partly er rely on external |libraries...discussed |elsewhere I don't think we're going to get the extensions all thread-safe... That could very well be a third-party library issue having little to do with PHP. If we can set t

RE: [PHP-DEV] is_*

The validation for an e-mail address is huge, if you don't believe me pick up a copy of Mastering Regular Expressions by O'Reilly and look it up And they can't claim it's perfect... I don't know about is_alpha() or is_alnum(), IMHO, I think is_valid_email() just doesn't belong. John |

RE: [PHP-DEV] prototypes for getters and setters.

also makes the assumtion that the user knows how the syntax |works.. - |eg. searching the file for getOrange would return nothing... | |Regards |Alan | |John Coggeshall wrote: | |>What about something like this... |> |>Class foo { |> |> var $myfoo; // "Private

RE: [PHP-DEV] prototypes for getters and setters.

What about something like this... Class foo { var $myfoo; // "Private" variable pubvar $myfoo2; // "Public" variable } Class bar extends foo { pubvar $mystuff; } $a = new foo(); $a->setmyfoo2(5); echo $a->getmyfoo2(); $b = new bar(); $b->setmyfoo2(10);

RE: [PHP-DEV] prototypes for getters and setters.

|syntax: | var [getter method] [setter method] $variable .; I think this syntax looks pretty interesting. It would allow the developer to create get/set if desired and doesn't look too strange either.. I'd like to see it in action myself :) John -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] Glob, anyone paying attention?

I was just playing with glob() and realized that its pretty undocumented (no flags doc'd) and none of the constants (GLOB_ONLYDIR for example) are actually defined in PHP Just wanted to see if anyone is doing something with this, if not (unless someone has an objection) I'll get put the const

  1   2   >