Title: Message
Hi
Chris,
Here
is something that Steve Stroh (who is a member of this listserv and who speaks
at ALL shows including WISPCON, ISPCON, WiNOG) wrote about
WiNOG
http://www.winog.com/austin_2006/vendors/what_i_learned_at_winog.pdf
(P.S.
-- he wasn't paid by us to do this o
Title: Message
old
news =)
that
was covered at the last WiNOG
http://www.winog.com/park-city_2005/sessions/day2_900mhz_bakeoff.htm
another place to check is http://www.wispreviews.com (the login
script is broken, but if you fiddle around with it, you should be able to get
in)
-Charles
.
WiNOG targets WISPs that are well
beyond the startup phase in longevity of business, overall scale of business,
network, and number of customers, but have not yet grown to have their needs met
by the three larger conferences. This is a very real, but specialized market
segment, and Charles Wu
Title: Message
>Are there any notes from the session? The
winog website doesn’t show anything.
it's
one of those things where you "kinda have to be there"
>Also, you mention the login script is broken
on wispreviews.com but I can’t even browse the forms as a guest.
Here's
the problem
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900MHz performance (Latency, Throughput)
Charles Wu wrote:
> P.S. I'm still looking for a goodphp guy to help fix things here
>
The first step would be to stop using PHP or for that matter any othe
13-253-0240
(w)613-291-2884 (c)BLOG: http://lindaleepond.blogspot.com/
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:18
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Wispcon?
Hi
Linda,
This i
nternet, NO
WIRES!-
- Original Message -----
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'Linda Pond' ; 'WISPA General
List'
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:03
AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Wispcon? -
OFFLIST
Hi
Linda,
This is offlist, sinc
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'Linda Pond' ; 'WISPA General
List'
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
10:03 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Wispcon? -
OFFLIST
Hi Linda,
This is offlist, since I d
21, 2006 12:38 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900MHz performance (Latency, Throughput)
Charles Wu wrote:
>Do you have any better suggestions?
>
>
>
What are your requirements?
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wis
Title: Message
Hi
Matt,
Your
questions on the Skyway 7000 & Trango Atlas would be answered by our
Backhaul Bash Report (costs $3k)
or--you can go to WiNOG and see a presentation of the results
live
http://www.winog.com/austin_2006/sessions/day3_backhaul1.htm
http://www.winog.com/austin_2
Title: Message
Have
you looked at Airaya's web site?
It's
pretty informative: http://www.airaya.com/products/p2m.asp
-Charles
---WiNOG Austin, TXMarch
13-15, 2006http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt
Generally, we end up debating all day and all night on the lists of "what's
the best radio" or "who's got those cool blue lights" -- however, FWIW, I've
noticed that there seldom is any debate on "useful" topics like sales &
marketing (especially of the product positioning of license-exempt wireles
Title: Message
East
Coast Snow =(
Go
Rockies -- east coast is WAY too icy
-Charles
---WiNOG Austin, TXMarch
13-15, 2006http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
G.V
sell 3Mbps at the market price of a T1 then to
sell our lower priced "T1" service.
All of the above means that while we are a seemingly large WISP, we
don't have that many customers; our ARPU is just very high.
-Matt
Charles Wu wrote:
>Generally, we end up debating all da
're busy, it's better value for our time to install and support our own
services.
Just random thoughts on the topic...
North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061
personal correspondence to: mark at neofast dot net
sales inquiries to: purchasing at neofast dot net
Fast Interne
Maybe you stumbled upon the fact that no one offers what you want
because it isn't cost effective to do so. As much as we try to wholesale
our VoIP offers to other WISPs, they want their cake and eat it too.
Being an ISP or for that matter a VoIP provider requires either relying
on others' inf
Jory
Give me a call 773.326.4614 x534 and I'll try to work something out for you
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jory Privett
Here's an interesting concept (so interesting, in fact, that we made a
session about it at our next show)
All wireless network operators today carry Internet advertising over their
networks. All that network traffic equates to more than $14 billion dollars
per year and is growing at double-digit
I think everyone of us need to be in our own VoIP business!! I have even
given thought to a Coop kind of deal, but I need to have some more beer and
thoughts on that :-)
Mac,
You need some BEER -N- WIRELESS GEAR
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13
We pay
between $0.002 to $0.005 per minute on average for domestic long distance.
Matt,
Out of curiosity...do you mean 2-5 cents per minute? Or 0.2 to 0.5 cents per
minute?
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-O
>What are the subs that I have to have to get a system like this???
>Jory Privett
>WCCS
Hi Jory,
Are you coming to WiNOG? The people from Adzilla will be there, so you can
meet them first-hand and talk with them directly
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
M
Title: Message
Like
it or not, it is worth noting that p0rn accounts for a VAST OVERWHELMING
MAJORITY of Internet traffic
-Charles
---WiNOG Austin, TXMarch
13-15, 2006http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Join us this month in Austin, TX at WiNOG, the premier forum for the
exchange of technical information and discussion of specific implementation
issues that organizations involved in the design, deployment and operation
of wireless networks face on a daily basis.
CPT300: ADVANCED CANOPY TECHNICAL
Title: Message
another WISP / ISP OSS vendor to check out is Airpath Wireless - www.airpath.com
They
come from the WiFi side, and are trying to do a few interesting things for fixed
wireless ISPs (in respect to roaming ideas, etc)
-Charles
---WiNO
>You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
>Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point generally
>Less than 45Mbps licensed.
Hi Matt,
I am curious to see where / what you got those numbers for the Orthogon
Spectra?
-Charles
-
I'm looking at moving to a licensed solution to increase throughput across
one of out backhaul links that spans 5 hops. Distances between hops range
anywhere from 7 to 19 miles.
Can anyone recommend a licensed radio manufacturer that should net us
50Mb-100Mb per hop?
Hi Bobby,
>From reading yo
can get a Spectra for $15 to $16k wheras a
Licensed link goes from $20k and up...
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Frida
Title: Message
but
with 2' on the Spectra, you're likely only to get about 60 Mbps of REAL
THROUGHPUT at 10+ miles =(
-Charles
---WiNOG Austin, TXMarch
13-15, 2006http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail
Title: Message
>The Spectra
would be around $20k with external antennas. A licensed product is going to be
at least that, and probably $5k more.
Sit
back and actually think for a second about this comparison, and you'll realize
that a similarly performing "unlicensed" solution will cost
MUC
day, March 19, 2006 6:10 PMTo:
WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL & Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Title: Message
Charles you make a good point, but I’m going to throw a “but” in
here:
but
the Orthogon / Canopy 300 radio’s will run also run at:
64
QAM .92 dual -62 receive
sensitivity
+18 output (252.9
throughput)
64
QAM .75 dual -68 receive
se
ent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles Wu wrote:
> In an attenuated lab setup, running TCP (w/ Iperf), we see the
> following results with the Spectra @ the 300 Mbps data rate
>
>
>
> 1 Way TCP Max
Hi Matt,
To answer your questions from my relatively "limited" sales & marketing
point of view
>RFC 2018 SACK
Yes it is enabled -- if you purchase a copy of our report, it shows the
exact system parameters configured on the box (basically, >sysctl -a | grep
tcp)
>RFC 896 Nagle
Can you please e
Alvarion VL is based on a WiFi chipset (this isn't meant to knock Alvarion,
since almost every 5 GHz PtMP WISP manufacturered product out there is also
based on a similar chipset)
Alvarion BreezeMAX (they're product pending WiMAX certification) doesn't
operate in 5 GHz
-Charles
-
Higher ARPU WISPs in the business are selling their services as WiMAX
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of KyWiFi LLC
Sent: Tuesday, April
That is correct, however those companies are expected to be shipping
product ( and are taking pre orders ) that will comply with the
testing whenever the gods at wimaxforum decide to get off their
collective arses and certify 5.8. Airspan for example, already has
wimax 4.9 product and is
nded Wimax will
> be available with Aperto and Airspan.
>
> What do you know Charles?
>
> George
>
> Charles Wu wrote:
>> Alvarion VL is based on a WiFi chipset (this isn't meant to knock
>> Alvarion,
>> since almost every 5 GHz PtMP WISP manufacturer
nly one to say that unlicended Wimax will be
available with Aperto and Airspan.
What do you know Charles?
George
Charles Wu wrote:
> Alvarion VL is based on a WiFi chipset (this isn't meant to knock
> Alvarion, since almost every 5 GHz PtMP WISP manufacturered product
> out ther
Maybe we should be branding our service as "Wi-Fiber". or Maybe "Ethernet
Internet Access" (of course like end users will know what Ethernet means.)
Spend trying to build a new brand around Wi-Fiber or just ride Intel /
WiMAX Forum's Marketing machine...
Here's the thing, chances are, wh
Motorola designed Canopy specifically for the WISP market, not the
carrier market.
Alvarion designed VL specifically for the carrier market, not the WISP
market.
Ah, the "mis-perceptions" of the "rugged" metal enclosure =)
Steve, can you please explain why carriers would prefer a CSMA/CA ove
The guy I spoke with on the phone (I did not get his name) told me that
these units are shipping now.
Hrm...
The guy I spoke with said that the FCC certs are pending approval and
that the unit is being tested for approval now.
Egads...
-Charles
---
2006 2:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP
agreed, VL is far from carrier grade
On Apr 12, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
>
> Motorola designed Canopy specifically for the WISP market, not the
> carrier market.
>
> Alvarion desi
Title: Message
Hi
Patrick,
I had
an interesting discussion with an Alvarion rep at WiNOG who implied that
Alvarion is reevaluating its position towards and is showing greater interest
again in the license-exempt service provider market
This
confirms that rumor =)
Good
to see you back
Does anyone provide coverage in Willis, OK -- have a business account lead
(contact offlist)
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K
FWIW -- there is a WISP in contact with the Lt Governor's Office and Crain's
about servicing this customer (they have a tower ~ 4 miles from the physical
location)
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
: 'WISPA General List'Subject: [WISPA] Charles Wu
email ?
Charles whats you
email, I lost my drive… new
laptop…
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless
Broadband Corp.
tel
787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless
Title: Message
Here
is one possible source for the information that you are looking
for
http://www.cwlab.com/testing_criteria.htm
-Charles
---CWLabTechnology
Architectshttp://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Take that "article/session" with a grain of salt -- as it is being run by an
organization that is supported by vendors trying to *sell* the concept of
muni-wifi
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
Fro
Title: Message
yes --
it's targeted towards 3G (mobile data) services
not
trying to sound snotty here -- but chances are, you're going to have a hard time
bidding on spectrum directly against verizon / cingular /
etc
-Charles
---CWLabTechnology
One thing to remember -- when buying and selling a business (or anything for
the matter) there has to be benefits on both sides (e.g., a win-win
solution)
Just as you are trying to maximize all your time and effort put into your
company, the buyer needs to be able to see a light at the end of the
OMFG
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 6:31 PM
To: WISPA General List; isp-wireless@isp-wir
Another point that's worth raising is if you (as an ISP/WISP/whatever) get
into the "value-added" services game yourself (and we all realize that the
business of just selling big dumb pipes is coming to an end)
Here's a question for the "Net Neutral" people -- if I'm a service provider,
and I deci
Systems work differently when operating under licensed vs. unlicensed bands
That said, no amount of "fancing beamforming" or signal processing or even
complex QAM modulation will bust through that -70ish noise floor
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
But what about oversubscription?
Transit costs aside, the cost of last-mile transport of even 1 Mbps of data
"pipe" is still far more than $20-30 / month
What happens when users actually start *using* the bandwidth they are
*promised*...
-Charles
---
CWLab
You can do a 5 MHz channel size on an Atheros chip (Off the top of my head,
Alvarion & Airaya have implemented it so far)
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 12:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Save the Internet (Net Neutrality)
It is? IIRC, the tariff price of 1.5 meg DSL from BellSouth is $23.95.
-Matt
>I was simply responding to your statement regarding just the last mile
>transport. If you want to include other considerations in the discussion
>then I don't understand your earlier email.
When considering net neutrality and its implications (e.g., allowing the TV
company to stream video over
Read below and you can decide on whether or not you will be "breaking the
law" w/ a 3650 deployment
---
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Cc: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 6:32 AM
Subject: [equipment-l] Experimental Licensing in the 3650 MHz Band -
Cl
the fact that the FCC has set the band aside for
> >>unlicensed anyways, and that the chance of the FCC cracking down on
> >>them is very low.
> >>
> >>Im not saying this is right, but reality is such that they will be
> >>evenutally amending the rules an
loyments of wisp size and not many large scale
deployments
> > outside of 2.5ghz or 700 mhz operators.
> >
> > -
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/24/06 6:14 AM, "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
To say the least -- a highly upsetting (to many operators) isse about WiMAX
is the fact that not all WiMAX is created equal...
Sure, WiMAX talks about QoS, ARQ, encryption, scheduled MACs, etc -- but is
it required for base certification today?
Hehe
-Charles
P.S. -- BREAKING NEWS FOR WISP types
lly hurry up and finish the rules to allow the
>> > industry
>> > to
>> > really take off. The common view with most manufacturers I have found
>> > is
>> > that until there is 3.5ghz or near spectrum available, there will be
>> > small
>
s going to be a shared
license program. IMHO, that means that you will only have to contend
with other operators as opposed to every consumer with a laptop.
-Matt
Charles Wu wrote:
>W/out a license, 3.6 is going to work just as *bad*
>
>You really need 700 (or a <1 GHz band) to really g
80
noise
floor
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment
Charles Wu wrote:
>W
unlicensed allocation. That is why I
>>support essentially splitting the band.
>>
>>Patrick Leary
>>AVP Marketing
>>Alvarion, Inc.
>>o: 650.314.2628
>>c: 760.580.0080
>>Vonage: 650.641.1243
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Charl
Some interesting statistics -- 30% of the WISPs who attended our last WiNOG
"claimed" on their surveys they had been in the wireless business for more
than 5 years and had more than 1k wireless CPE deployed in the field
Less than 10% of them claimed to be "pure-play" license-exempt fixed
wireless
TED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 3:35 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] This is HUGE!
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 1:34 PM
To: 'WISPA
market leader,
Motorola Canopy sold close to $100 million in gear last year alone"
In the total combined market we still lead, but for sure the real test comes
when all major TEMs field their own 802.16e-2005.
Patrick Leary
AVP Marketing
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Hi Matt,
To throw in a dose of realism -- even if you roll your own Mikrotik solution
- it will most likely cost you more than the $300-600 / unit budget that you
have (and you get ZERO support =)
Example
RB532A: $185
SR5: $105
SR2: $105
All that is is a board and 2 radio cards -- then you stil
Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 2:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
-Matt
Charles Wu wrote:
>Hi Matt,
>
>To th
>19807 Catawba Ave.
>Cornelius, NC 28031
Boun Senekham (CTI Sales Rep) actually lives in Cornelius, NC -- maybe he
might know someone?
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/U
Just do it like the mesh guys
20-30 APs / square mile
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sam Tetherow
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1
Jeffrey Thomas = Jeff Booher
Jeffrey Thomas Booher actually
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JohnnyO
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 11
I think Jon is asking about the "double VLAN" -- or a "q in q"
implementation
It's extremely useful for creating virtual bridged customer networks
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
Google (or Cisco) is your friend
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_guid
e09186a00801f0f4a.html
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt
re is abilty to creaetequivelent of virtual circuits
of Ethernet.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, June 0
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 11:34 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
Google (or Cisco) is your friend
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/io
Hi Patrick,
For clarification purposes -- 70 Mbps is achievable only in Turbo mode (40
Mhz channel sizes) correct?
Also -- will it support a "slim" 5 or 10 Mhz channel mode?
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Me
Title: Message
are
you planning on getting your customer an AS & running
BGP?
if not
-- and you're willing to roll up your sleaves a bit, you can "hack it" w/ some
Mikrotik scripting (In my ISP days, one of my customers back in 2002/2003, Larry
Yunker actually, was doing this b/n our conn
Title: Message
it's a
bit more complicated than OSPF if you're trying to backup ANOTHER provider's
connection (assuming separate ASes, etc)
-Charles
P.S.
-- ASes = Plural for Autonamous Systems, not that other dirty word
=/
---CWLabTechnology
Hi Tom,
Not to add another "chink" to your debate -- but it is worth noting that
Mikrotik is more of a "jack of all trades" solution (they do routing,
hotspot, etc) than a wireless solution
While they do an ok job w/ wireless, IMO, their strength is more the
convenience coming from the integratio
d have to voice support for the
OS.
Sure do compare with Star-OS and others; or a real DIY: build
it from bare hardware and FreeBSD/Linux with WiFi drivers or whatever... but
as this thread came from "vendor products" I thought it worth chipping in -
just my £0.01's wort
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $
6K
Hi Tom,
Not to add another "chink" to your
Title: Message
Screenshot of NMS from full-speed lab testing,
83Mbps UDP traffic with ~20% CPU loadhttp://www.cablefreesolutions.com/radio/HPR%20lab%20testing%20UDP.pngScreenshot
of NMS from full-speed lab testing, 74Mbps TCP/IP traffic with ~20% CPU
loadhttp://www.cablefreesolutions.com/
feedback
>saying consistently "performance better than Brand X" even comparing a
>simple L2 wireless bridge then I'd have to voice support for the OS.
>
>Sure do compare with Star-OS and others; or a real DIY: build it from
>bare hardware and FreeBSD/Linux with WiFi dr
re and FreeBSD/Linux with WiFi drivers or whatever... but as
this thread came from "vendor products" I thought it worth chipping in
- just my £0.01's worth.
Regards
Stephen
CableFree Solutions
www.cablefreesolutions.com
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL & Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 11:56
AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps
- was OT:
It generally isn't an issue
I'd be more worried about windmills
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
Sent: Tuesday, June
Title: Message
out of
curiosity (would like input from the pro net neutral people) -- would blocking
something like FON constitute a violation of net neutrality?
-Charles
---CWLabTechnology
Architectshttp://www.cwlab.com
-Original Messa
And don't forget that it's WiFi vs. a proprietary engineered outdoor WISP
protocol
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sen
y effect WISP network in a major way.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008 http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Wednesday
>a whole 49 square feet, eh ? Real hard. :)
Some interesting thoughts for Friday
I forget the exact numbers, but Tropos recommends something like 20 APs /
square mile to get 95% coverage at b/g rates
49 square miles = 49*20 ~ 960 Aps
Part# MTR-52103000-500AA is a 500 pack of HotZone Aps on t
ess Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 1:43 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Program
>a whole 49 square feet, eh ? Rea
More importantly -- from a cochannel and receiver sensitivity perspective --
FH doesn't get the processing gain benefits of "spread" spectrum
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 900 radio
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Charles Wu wrote:
>More importantly -- from a cochannel and receiver sensitivity
>perspective -- FH doesn&
Hi Patrick
How did you guys measure throughput? TCP / UDP / Smartbits?
Inquiring minds would like to know
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Beha
Title: Message
maybe
you're a customer and just don't know it
-Charles
---CWLabTechnology
Architectshttp://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gino A. VillariniSent: Thurs
1. yes
2. Part 101 (Same as 11, 18, 23)
3. yes
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:34 PM
To: WISPA Ge
Check out:
http://www.shorecliffcommunications.com/magazine/volume.asp?Vol=39&story=365
-Charles
P.S. -- we also do frequency coordination
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
I personally know them, and FWIW there's a lot of bark there...
-Charles
---
WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Near You
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent:
1 - 100 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
