Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE LAB PHONES [7940-7960] CME SIP QUESTION.

[Mike Thompson]

An important difference between 40/60 and newer phones are actually specific to 
SIP. When dialing from a 40/60 in SIP, it uses en bloc dialing, meaning that it 
sends the called party as one big set of numbers.  41/61 and later do KPML 
which acts more like SCCP in that each digit is sent as it's hit and call 
routing decisions are made with every key press. In en bloc dialing, the 
decision isn't made until the number is presented to UCM, which occurs after 
either the inter-digit timeout expires or you press the dial softkey. 

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jul 21, 2011, at 1:10 AM,  wrote:

> I’m working on putting together my home lab and have started working on CME.
> 
>  
> 
> I have researched the 7940 and 7960 and on CUCM7 they are supported with the 
> following SIP images 7940 SIP-P0S3-8-12-00 and 7960 SIP-SIP41.9-0-2SR1S.  
> Will these same images work on CME.  Does someone out there know what SIP 
> image to download for CME to support these phones for SIP?  Any suggestions 
> would be appreciated.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] What kind of server hardware are you all using for the UC Apps

[Mike Thompson]

One little side note, u can't run more than 1 physical CPU on the free license 
of ESXi.  It can have up to 8 cores if I remember right, but 1 socket

I am upgrading to a second box because I plan on messing with things like 
vmotion in the future. 

The new one is more than enough on it's own. Quad core xeon (3.3ghz) 16gb of 
ddr3 (8 would be plent for voice lab), 2 500 gb drives (don't go single drive, 
SATA I/O will be a definite bottleneck, so at least dual drives. Don't sweat 
over sata III over sata II because spinning drives won't push 6gb of data 
realistically anyway. 

Btw, I went xeon E3 series over i7 because xeon are built for virtualization 
and this will never be turned into a recreational pc. 


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Eliot Ngwa  wrote:

> I've got my network devices for my home lab. Now, I'm just curious as to what 
> kind of servers you all are using to run the CUCM, CUPS, UCCX, AND Connection 
> apps on VMWare. I was thinking of getting a Dell PE 1850 with 12GB ram but 
> not sure if that will be enough. Is there major difference in performance by 
> going with a dual dual core vs dual quad core? I would appreciate any 
> cost-effective solutions you can offer. Thank you
> 
> tony starks
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Taking the lab next week

[Mike Thompson]

Approach is entirely subjective.  Just HAVE A PLAN AND STICK TO IT. I can't 
emphasize enough that you should have a process and stick to it...especially 
the first time.  I was so scattered my first time that I wasted at least an 
hour trying to get my bearings.  It is VERY easy to do.  

Have a plan, follow your plan, and remember...it's not life or death.  Calm and 
steady is TRULY your best weapon.  

I recommend have a strong plan on documenting dial plan and notes on each 
phone.  That way you'd don't need to constantly reread.  And as u go thru and 
make your notes, put a reference to the page u got it from. At 2:00, you're not 
going to remember the note u made at 9am


Good luck !!

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:21 AM, "Peterson, Ryan"  wrote:

> Hi experts!
> 
>  
> 
> I am taking my lab next week in San Jose for the first time.  Besides the 
> excellent coffee I keep hearing about, does anyone have any advice they would 
> impart?
> 
>  
> 
> For example, I am back and forth on using the device method vs the linear 
> method.
> 
>  
> 
> Without breaking NDA, anything people would be willing to share about the 
> next few days of prep would be welcome.
> 
>  
> 
> Make it a great day!
> 
>  
> 
> Ryan
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> 
> The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
> intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
> whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
> not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
> PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
> the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
> communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GradedLabs (INE) rack rental

[Mike Thompson]

I don't necessarily like the idea of 5.5 hours, but one thing is good about 
that.  IDEALLY, you should target 5.5 to 6 hours to get most of your work done. 
Giving you an hr to troubleshoot and an hr buffer (psychological effects, etc)

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jun 25, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Bill Lake  wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I have never used them but their sessions are 5.5 hours long, but they
> do seem cheaper and this weekend they have a buy one get one free
> promo this is the email I got
> 
> Rack Rentals, Buy One Get One Free!
> 
> This weekend only! Save over 50% on your next rack rental purchase
> from INE.com. This offer applies to the following rack rental token
> bundles:
> 
>* 500 Rack Rental Tokens - Only $249 a $251 savings! - Buy Now
>* 700 Rack Rental Tokens - Only $349 a $351 savings! - Buy Now
>* 1000 Rack Rental Tokens - Only $499 a $501 savings! - Buy Now
> 
> Rack Rental Token Details
> 
> Ready to get the hands on experience needed to pass the actual CCIE
> Lab Exam? Look no further than our CCIE Rack Rentals, powered by
> Gradedlabs.com. We offer rack rentals with simplified scheduling and
> advanced management control of CCNA, CCNP, CCIE Routing & Switching,
> CCIE Voice, CCIE Security, and CCIE Service Provider Rack Rentals that
> support all of our Self-Paced and Instructor-Led product lines.
> 
> Rack rentals are sold in 5.5 hour blocks and are offered in four time slots:
> S1. 3:00am - 8:30am Pacific Daylight Time (-7 UTC)
> S2. 9:00am - 2:30pm Pacific Daylight Time (-7 UTC)
> S3. 3:00pm - 8:30pm Pacific Daylight Time (-7 UTC)
> S4. 9:00pm - 2:30am Pacific Daylight Time (-7 UTC)
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Dave  wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Can you comment on gradedlabs (INE) voice rack quality if you have used
>> before? its price is cheaper compared to IPExpert proctorlabs (2.5 times
>> cheaper) & CCBootcamp (NLI) seems the most expensive Voice Rack.
>> Can anybody comment on quality if you have used before?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dave
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto QoS for MLP LFI

[Mike Thompson]

And I dare say, if you know it properly, you can prob do both sides as quickly 
(due to cut and paste) by hand as u can with auto qos once u tweak the A qos 
config. 

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Vik Malhi  wrote:

> The most annoying thing doing MLP LFI manually is the attachment of the 
> Virtual-Template to the DLCI, the removal of the IP Address from the WAN 
> interface into the VT and the repeat on the other side. And one of the most 
> commonly forgotten commands is enabling FRTS on the physical Serial 
> interface. So I like to think of autoqos as de-risking the whole operation. 
> In saying all of this- there can be no harm in knowing how to do it manually 
> (in your practice sessions) for your own understanding.
> -- 
> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
> Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130 
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat 
>  
> 
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, 
> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE 
> (R&S, Voice, Wireless, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with 
> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and 
> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at 
> www.ipexpert.com/communities   and our 
> public website at www.ipexpert.com   
> 
> From: George Goglidze 
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:11:43 +
> To: Shrini 
> Cc: OSL Group 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto QoS for MLP LFI
> 
> well, it does not take me 20-30 minutes mate. 
> 
> the one thing I don't like of auto qos, is that in many cases it generates 
> things you might not need.
> like access lists for example, and the task might require nbar.
> 
> still doesn't take me more then  5-10 minutes once I understand what the 
> requirements are.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Shrini  wrote:
> Auto qos does the same what you are doing manually, you need to just edit 
> them and it takes 5 mins as compared to manually configuring which may take 
> 20-30 mins
> 
> 
> On 3/8/2011 3:33 PM, George Goglidze wrote:
>> 
>> do you guys recommend applying auto-qos on a router at all??
>> 
>> I tend to just configure all myself. it does not really take long. 
>> 
>> map-class
>> blahblah
>> 
>> class-map 
>> blahblah
>> 
>> policy-map
>> blahblah
>> 
>> interface virtual-template if needed
>> blah
>> 
>> interface serial0/0/0:0
>> frame-relay traffic-shaping
>> 
>> interface  serial0/0/0:0.1
>> dlci
>> class ...
>> 
>> so what does the majority of people do? auto qos... YES or NO??
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:50 PM, ccieid1ot  wrote:
>> Set the bandwidth on the pvc before applying auto qos.
>> 
>> duy
>> ccie #27737 voice
>> 
>> tmobile g2
>> 
>> On Mar 8, 2011 4:13 PM, "Ccie Voice"  wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > 
>> > could you please tell me what is the most important things that I should 
>> > adjust 
>> > if I need to use Auto QoS for MLP.
>> > 
>> > i know it depends on the requirements but there is some headlines like:
>> > 
>> > auto qos voip trust fr-atm
>> > 
>> > 1- set the priority BW for voip to 33 
>> > 2- change the mincir in map-class to 95% of CIR
>> > 
>> > 3- Any thing related to IPs
>> > 
>> > Please remind me :)
>> > 
>> > Regards,
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> 
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> ___ For more information 
> regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC

[Mike Thompson]

He probably just likes to hear people talk down to him.  Maybe that's why he 
asked the question in a educational forum. 

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Feb 21, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Roger Källberg  wrote:

> Yes you can use the + in EPNM, if that's what you meant? 
> 
> As a side note, why don't you just try and see what happens?
> 
> ** Sent from my iPhone. Excuse brevity and typographical errors. **
> 
> 21 feb 2011 kl. 09:53 skrev "khaled Saholy" :
> 
>> 
>> 
>> I mean how can we display the plus sign on Cisco IP Phones?
>> 
>> Regards.
>> 
>> Khaled
>> 
>> From: khaled_sah...@hotmail.com
>> To: roger.kallb...@cygate.se; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:31:53 +0300
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Is the + sign supported on the CIPC?
>> 
>> Khaled
>> 
>> 
>> > From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
>> > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:46:59 +0100
>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC
>> > 
>> > I really hope that this is not a serious question.
>> > 
>> > Set EPNM, External Phone Number Mask.
>> > 
>> > Roger Källberg
>> > CCIE #26199 (Voice)
>> > 
>> > ** Sent from my iPhone. Excuse brevity and typographical errors. **
>> > 
>> > 20 feb 2011 kl. 06:21 skrev "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
>> > :
>> > 
>> > > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>> > > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> > > 
>> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> > > ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>> > > 
>> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
>> > > ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>> > > 
>> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> > > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>> > > 
>> > > Hi guys,
>> > > I have been looking for the way a whole day that how to display the name 
>> > > on top line of CIPC, that CIPC registered on the CUCM. Does anybody know 
>> > > how to do that? Thanks a million.
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > ___
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> ___ For more information 
>> regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Introduction

[Mike Thompson]

He's got a funny dialect is all...must be from the east side...

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Dec 23, 2010, at 10:10 AM, "bkvalent...@gmail.com"  
wrote:

> I knew this guy was lying... John Smith from UK with broken English. 
> 
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
> 
> - Reply message -
> From: "John Smith" 
> Date: Wed, Dec 22, 2010 10:46 am
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Introduction
> To: 
> 
> HI Team,
> 
> I am john smith located in UK.
> 
> I am new to this forum. SO hello to all you guys.
> 
> I have started preparation for ccie voice since last sixth month.
> 
> Guys i would need your help and as far as i know this group is very helpful.
> 
> So many of my friends are member of this group.
> 
> I hope my query will be answered and i look to learn from this forum as
> well.
> 
> Thanks once again guys.
> 
> Rgds,
> John Smith
> 
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Striping Calling Name On MGCP Router

[Mike Thompson]

Under the route pattern, in the section where you choose Calling party 
manipulations (first section), if you set calling party name to restricted, it 
does the same thing. 

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Dec 4, 2010, at 10:57 AM, "Tamer Ismail"  wrote:

> Hello Experts,
> 
> How can we strip calling name while we sending the call to PSTN?
> 
> On VG, we can add clid strip name under dial-peer.
> 
>  
> 
> But what about MGCP router?
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  
> 
>
> 
> Tamer Ismail
> 
> CONNECT Professional Services
> 
> Website: www.connectps.com
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] retaking date

[Mike Thompson]

It won't let you schedule any earlier than you're allowed to.  Try to schedule 
it online, if it let's u...you're all set

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Nov 9, 2010, at 3:04 AM, Shady Hasan  wrote:

> I have a similar issue. 
> To be 100% sure, please register to "Cisco Certification and Communities 
> Online support"
> "https://ciscocert.secure.force.com/english/MainPage";
> 
> Ask your case and you will have official reply from Cisco within 2 business 
> days.
> Regards,
> Shady.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM, rsmail...@solcon.nl  
> wrote:
> hi,
> 
> i am wondering how the 30 day retake period counts.
> 
> the 30 days start the day after taking the exam.
> but is it that you can take a new exam on day 30 or is it also the day
> after day 30 ?
> 
> i am wondering, because otherwise i have to wait till next year before
> retaking the exam.
> 
> example:
> 25 october exam date
> 24 november retake (is the 30st day)
> 
> regards for the info
> 
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE LAB PASSED !!!

[Mike Thompson]

Eh, that's assuming the douchebag even had a number.  


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:32 AM, "Ryan Schwab"  wrote:

> Lol - just too bad he didn't let his # slip out :)
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Lawson [mailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com] 
> Sent: October-28-10 9:25 AM
> To: Duncan Hamilton-Walker
> Cc: Ryan Schwab; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; voice rascal
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE LAB PASSED !!!
> 
> We're banning this guy - please disregard. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244 (R&S)
> Founder, President & CEO - IPexpert, Inc., Proctor Labs, Inc. & Platinum 
> Solutions Group, LLC.
> Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.334.1564
> eFax: +1.810.454.0244
> 
> ::Message sent from iPhone
> 
> IPexpert & Proctor Labs are premier providers of Self-Study Workbooks, Video 
> on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the 
> Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Wireless, Security & Service Provider) 
> certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, 
> Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at 
> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com or 
> www.proctorlabs.com.
> 
> Platinum Solutions Group (PSG) provides high-end consulting and staffing 
> services with a primary emphasis on Cisco's Data Center, Network Security, 
> Service Provider, Wireless and Unified Communications technologies. Be sure 
> to visit www.platinumsolutionsgroup.com.
> 
> CCIE-focused job community located at www.platinumplacementservices.com.
> 
> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:21 AM, "Duncan Hamilton-Walker" 
>  wrote:
> 
>> NDA !!!
>> 
>> "I have all the lab as well as solutions for the lab.If anyone is 
>> interested in knowing what lab i have got and what solution i have 
>> done"
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Congrats to you man! What’s your lucky CCIE #??
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>>> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of voice 
>>> rascal
>>> Sent: October-28-10 8:25 AM
>>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE LAB PASSED !!!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hello to everyone,
>>> 
>>> Guys i have finally passed !!! Finally i have Passed.
>>> 
>>> I would like to thank this forum alot and all the members who post 
>>> help ppl like us.
>>> 
>>> I have referred to this forum for most of my queries.
>>> 
>>> Thank you all.
>>> 
>>> I have all the lab as well as solutions for the lab.
>>> 
>>> If anyone is interested in knowing what lab i have got and what 
>>> solution i have done.
>>> 
>>> I would be happy to help.
>>> 
>>> Kindly mail me back if any one interested in knowing the solution.
>>> 
>>> Thanks once again.
>>> 
>>> Rgds,
>>> Voice Pascal
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cant ping CUCM from my UNITY CONNECTION SERVER

[Mike Thompson]

If it's not VMWare, it may be windows firewall if you're running on 2008 
server. Icmp reply gets knocked down by default

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Oct 18, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Pithog Oil  wrote:

> 
> 
> --- On Mon, 10/18/10, Graham Hopkins  wrote:
> Thanks i have been knocking my head for while now.
>  
>  
> 
> From: Graham Hopkins 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cant ping CUCM from my UNITY CONNECTION SERVER
> To: "Pithog Oil" 
> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
> Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 12:56 PM
> 
> I have seen this issue with both servers running in VMWare on the same 
> hardware not idea why but think it's probably VMWare related
> 
> 
> 
> On 18 Oct 2010, at 13:50, Pithog Oil  wrote:
> 
>> Quite Strange,
>>  
>> Has anyone ran into this before, i integrated CUCM with Cisco unity 
>> connection and every thing works including MWI , but when i try to ping my 
>> CUCM from the servers in Cisco unity i get a timeout/ no response.
>>  
>> Though the AXL admin can successfully send a test.
>>  
>> Please i need suggestion on how to fix this, i dont think its consisitent 
>> with how things should work.
>> 
> 
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hotels in Columbus

[Mike Thompson]

And be careful, due to the number of hotels I'm a small area, lots of car break 
ins

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Sep 19, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Amp  wrote:

> Hey Gang,
> Can anyone tell me if the Extended Stay Deluxe - Polaris is in walking 
> distance to the IPexpert training facility?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Amp
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hotels in Columbus

[Mike Thompson]

It's about 1/2 mile

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Sep 19, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Amp  wrote:

> Hey Gang,
> Can anyone tell me if the Extended Stay Deluxe - Polaris is in walking 
> distance to the IPexpert training facility?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Amp
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] phone is not taking IP from DHCP server

[Mike Thompson]

Place a laptop in that vlan, get an IP?  Then the prob isn't UCM?  No, ten 
troubleshoot scope.  

If you do from laptop / PC, then plz send switch config. 

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Sep 18, 2010, at 4:07 PM, "ratan  singh"  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have 2 phones in HQ site & 2 phone in BR1 and have created DHCP pool 
> in CUCM. HQ phones connection are
> 
> CUCM >SW1hub--->HQ phones
> 
> Configuration for HQ phones:--
> 
> HQ Router:- i have added Ip helper address(CCUM PUB IP)in the router
> In SW1:-- interface ra fa0/1-2
> switchport mode access
> switchport access vlan(data vlan ID)
> switchport voice vlan(voice vlan ID)
> 
> 
> BR1 phones connection are 
> 
> Router--->Br1 phones
> 
> Configurtaion for Br1
> 
> i have added Ip helper address(CCUM PUB IP)on voice vlan interface
> & on phones interface
> 
> interface ra fa0/1-2
> switchport mode trunk
> switchport access vlan(data vlan ID)
> switchport voice vlan(voice vlan ID)
> spanning tree portfast
> 
> 
> 
> Here is the problem, My BR1 phones are able to register with CUCM & 
> they are working fine.But my HQ phones are not taking IPs from CUCM. 
> Can anyone help me to resolve this issue?
> 
> 
> Thanks a ton in advance.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> With Warm Regards
> 
> Ratan Singh
> Network Engineer
> Mobile:-91-9818807770
> 
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Supplementary Services with Remote GK

[Mike Thompson]

Try integrating an MTP

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Aug 2, 2010, at 8:52 PM, "CCIE Voice GMAIL"  
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
>  
> 
> Is there something special you need to configure with a Remote GK in order to 
> enable transfers or holds?  I am fooling around with the various commands 
> under voice service voip, but nothing is giving me any success yet. 
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST Hunt group

[Mike Thompson]

If it's straight srst (not cme) us the alias command with sequence  
ordering under call-manager-fallback section.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:48 PM, "Ashar Siddiqui"   
wrote:



Hi all,



I came across an interesting situation today for a customer and  
thought to take input from you guys.




Customer has several sites which connects to Central CUCM cluster.  
Each site has SRST enabled.


During Out of hours the main line is forwarded to a Hunt group which  
has three internal extensions on different sites. If those are not  
reachable the call is the forwarded to an external number.




This will work fine as long as the MPLS cloud is up. If the MPLS  
cloud goes down or CUCM goes down then phones will be in SRST mode.  
How the hunt group thing will work?




I think on the gateway where the call comes in, I will  have to  
create a hunt group isn’t it?




dial-peer hunt 2



ephone-hunt 3 peer
 pilot 6400
 list 6401, 6402, 6403
 hops 3
 timeout 25
 final 901189881654


Any one there who can shed some more light on this config?



Ash>

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to creat Bill of Material for cisco devices.

[Mike Thompson]

Under Cisco.com, log in, click ordering, then click dynamic configuration
tool (DCT as it's often referred).

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rashid Khan
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 4:06 AM
To: ccie voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to creat Bill of Material for cisco
devices.

 

hey friends can't recall which tool is used to creat Bill of Material for
Cisco devices, Please help,

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

[Mike Thompson]

Utils service list will show the list of services and their status

 

 

From: Ryan Schwab [mailto:schwab...@shaw.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:15 AM
To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

Mike, on that note, are there any specific CLI commands you can think of to
verify this? :)

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: April-07-10 11:16 PM
To: 'Ryan Schwab'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

I would agree, first things is to verify that Tomcat is happy.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Schwab
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM
To: 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

>From what I understand, the Duplex message is an issue with the ESX setup,
and nothing to be considered about. If it's a nuisance, disable CDP on Fa
1/0/4 with "no cdp enable"

 

Can you SSH into the Pub? Perhaps the services have yet to fully load.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of vccie2010
Sent: April-07-10 10:59 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

I am in middle of the session on Proctor labs...

 

I am getting " %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on 
FastEthernet1/0/4 (not half duplex), with CUC7-Pub eth0 (half duplex)." on
HQ 3750 Switch.

 

I can ping 10.10.210.10 CUCM but can't web browse into it. 

 

Any help will be highly appreciated.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

[Mike Thompson]

Syntax escapes me right now, but there will be a show service or list
service command that will show the status of all services on the server.  It
should show status as well

 

From: Ryan Schwab [mailto:schwab...@shaw.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:15 AM
To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

Mike, on that note, are there any specific CLI commands you can think of to
verify this? :)

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: April-07-10 11:16 PM
To: 'Ryan Schwab'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

I would agree, first things is to verify that Tomcat is happy.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Schwab
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM
To: 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

>From what I understand, the Duplex message is an issue with the ESX setup,
and nothing to be considered about. If it's a nuisance, disable CDP on Fa
1/0/4 with "no cdp enable"

 

Can you SSH into the Pub? Perhaps the services have yet to fully load.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of vccie2010
Sent: April-07-10 10:59 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

I am in middle of the session on Proctor labs...

 

I am getting " %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on 
FastEthernet1/0/4 (not half duplex), with CUC7-Pub eth0 (half duplex)." on
HQ 3750 Switch.

 

I can ping 10.10.210.10 CUCM but can't web browse into it. 

 

Any help will be highly appreciated.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

[Mike Thompson]

I would agree, first things is to verify that Tomcat is happy.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Schwab
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM
To: 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

>From what I understand, the Duplex message is an issue with the ESX setup,
and nothing to be considered about. If it's a nuisance, disable CDP on Fa
1/0/4 with "no cdp enable"

 

Can you SSH into the Pub? Perhaps the services have yet to fully load.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of vccie2010
Sent: April-07-10 10:59 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM

 

I am in middle of the session on Proctor labs...

 

I am getting " %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on 
FastEthernet1/0/4 (not half duplex), with CUC7-Pub eth0 (half duplex)." on
HQ 3750 Switch.

 

I can ping 10.10.210.10 CUCM but can't web browse into it. 

 

Any help will be highly appreciated.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time of Day Routing

[Mike Thompson]

The way we addressed those in the past is to have any 911 calls coming from
a class room ring a internal security group (hunt group) consisting of a
dozen or so numbers of internal staff (phones that are always manned in some
form or fashion during the day).  Any calls that require actual emergency
services are then dispatched / contacted by the office staff of the school.
Another option is if they want to install CER to do e-911, then you can make
the PSAP response callback number a viable endpoint for incoming calls.

 

HTH

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Sivakumar
Mahalingam
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 10:08 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time of Day Routing

 

Hi All,

 

I need some help in tweaking the TOD routing configuration on a real
network.

 

Scenario :

 

It's a school environment where we have configured the TOD for the classroom
phones to goto VM during instruction hours( 8-5) and ring the phone after
hours.It's working and the problem we are facing is, when someone makes a
911 call during instructional hour from a classroom phone the call goes to
the PSAP and if the PSAP calls back that number ,it directs the PSAP officer
to the VM of that extension.

So my question is, is there a way to overide the TOD routing for certain
incoming numbers (say 10 numbers from PSAP) and allow those calls only to
ring the phone directly during instructional hours.

I appericiate all your ideas and help. 

Thanks in advance.

Simah.

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vouchers

[Mike Thompson]

:facepalm:
And he would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for those  
pesky kids (chat history)


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Mar 25, 2010, at 2:14 PM, "Drew LePla"  wrote:


Kapil,



We in no way condone soliciting on this list. This is strictly a  
CCIE study list and all posts should only contain topics that  
pertain to CCIE Study. Consider this you first warning, a second  
offense will result in expulsion from this list.




--Started:   23 Mar 2010  
9:05:33-


Kapil Atrish:
actually I want to offer them on the voice alias, if someone  
interested in buying

Drew LePla:
We do not allow soliciting on OSL.
Kapil Atrish:
I thought of checking with you before blindly posting it
Drew LePla:
Yeah they frown on that just strictly a support forum for CCIE  
topics.




Regards,



Drew LePla - COMP TIA A+, CCNA - IPexpert

Lead Technical Support Engineer

Mailto: dle...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 204

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130



IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco  
CCNA (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice,  
Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations  
throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check  
out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our  
public website at www.ipexpert.com




From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of kapil atrish

Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:36 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vouchers



Hi List,



I've discussed this with PL team and taken their permission before  
posting this.




I've around 20 odd vouchers available at minimal price. Those are  
left overs after passing my lab. If anyone interested pl PM me. All  
vouchers are valid for V3.




Thanks



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called & Calling Party Transformations

[Mike Thompson]

Whenever I'm building those CSS, I always name my xform patterns and
partitions accordingly.

 

Can take a few extra minutes, but I am all but guaranteed to lose more than
that troubleshooting in a lab scenario

 

From: Mike Brooks [mailto:2xcci...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 11:56 PM
To: mthompson...@gmail.com
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called & Calling Party Transformations

 

Yes, I agree. It is just sort of misleading.  You would think called party
transformations can only affect the called number, and calling party
transformations can only affect the calling number, but that is not the
case.

 

Basically, as you mentioned, they are just transformation patterns assigned
to partitions within calling search spaces.  The functionality of the
transformation pattern is entirely dependent on where the CSS is applied on
the device and not to the type of transformation pattern it is (called vs
calling).

 

Mike

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:13 PM,  wrote:

 

Mike, 
isn't that more of a partitioning question as it relates to the
transformations? 


On Mar 21, 2010 8:34pm, Mike Brooks <2xcci...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> I just discovered something on accident that seems more like a bug. 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> On the phones you can only configure the "calling party transformation
css", which makes sense because you have already reached the destination
(called #/phone). 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> BUT the "calling party transformation css" can contain "called party
transformation patterns".  Even though they are "called party
transformations" they will match the calling number and perform the
manipulation as if they were "calling party transformations". 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> Just something I noticed.  Not sure if its that important but perhaps
something to be aware of when troubleshooting an issue with calling and
called party transformations on devices.  
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> Mike Brooks 
> 
> 
> CCIE#16027 (R&S) 
> 
> 
>

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Clarification: mls qos map cos-dscp

[Mike Thompson]

This has been a topic of conversation at work between a few of us, so  
I'm interested in the feedback.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Mar 18, 2010, at 5:55 AM, "Berry, Matthew J." > wrote:


The QoS SRND states that the "auto qos voip" command adds the  
following config to the router:


C2970(config)# mls qos
C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 26 32 46 48 56

Earlier in the SRND, around page 40, it says that the old marking  
for audio signaling was AF31 (26).  That is the same DSCP marking  
listed above.


As part of our "best-practice" scenario, should we be changing the  
command to consider audio signaling as CS3 (24)?  The command would  
need to be modified:


C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56

Is this true?  Otto, can you weigh in on this one?

Thanks!

Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Mike Thompson]

??? When did that change take place?and why?

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Paul Kruger  wrote:


Hi Mike,

While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know  
that you shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore.  
They've changed it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I  
can't vouch for the other tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass  
this section to pass the lab. Even if it is only 4 points. If you  
fail this and get full 96 points from the lab, you still fail.


Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the  
test harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was  
implemented already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.


On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson  
 wrote:
Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re  
forgetting a key thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questio 
ns that are, if you’re actually prepared for the exam, elementary qu 
estions.  Each of these questions take a few minutes to answer on av 
erage.  I mean there isn’t much calculation to ‘what is the TCP  
port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an actual question I received 
).  It’s not like they want you to calculate the airspeed of an unla 
iden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take less than 15 
 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and yes, i 
t’s not really a head start, but you get the gist).  More importantl 
y, you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more point 
s to get your number.




Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points  
per minute)


Or

465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).



Just my 2 cents folks



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Tyson Scott

Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
To: 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
Cc: 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL';  
ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL |  
CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert




But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.



Regards,



Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP

Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130



IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on  
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training  
for the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)  
certification(s) with training locations throughout the United  
States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our  
online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public  
website at www.ipexpert.com




From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nadeem Rafi

Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
To: Brandon Carroll
Cc: CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com 
; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers  
from IPexpert




a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll > wrote:


Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
when you are preparing for the CCIE.



Regards,

Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
www.ipexpert.com

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic > wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll > wrote:
>> Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a  
student?

>> Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former
>> students point of viewWOW.  Unbelievable!
>
> Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically
> giving away this deal.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS SRND - Page 105

[Mike Thompson]

Damn good question!!   My thought is that the call on hold will be  
'termiated' at the call control and not to the phone.


So while a call is on hold, the bandwidth will be near 0 to the phone.



Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:17 AM, "Berry, Matthew J." > wrote:


Pulling from the QoS SRND, the following configuration is only  
supposed to allow the bandwidth for one voice call per switchport  
VLAN.  Obviously, based on the 128k, we're focused on G.711 calls  
(so my next question will not apply to G.729).


I want to know if the following command would disable the ability to  
have multiple calls (different lines) on the same phone.  For  
example: Phone A (with the policing command below) calls Phone B.   
At this point, 128k of G.711 bandwidth is consumed.  If Phone A puts  
Phone B on hold and calls Phone C, would the call no go through due  
to policing?


CAT2970(config-cmap)#policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
CAT2970(config-pmap)#class VVLAN-VOICE
CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# set ip dscp 46 ! DSCP EF (Voice)
CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# police 128000 8000 exceed-action drop

I guess what I am asking is what happens to the initial call when it  
is placed on hold?  Is the audio stream maintained between phones  
(128k), thereby eliminating the ability to place another call?


Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 123

[Mike Thompson]

OEQ is 4 questions but worth 21 points.  You need to answer 3 of 4  
questions correctly and the 21 points is all or nothing.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Mar 18, 2010, at 7:01 AM, vijay kumar yadav   
wrote:



Hi,

If OEQ is of 4 points, how much do we need on the lab part, to pass  
the exm excluding these 4 points.



Regards
Vijay Yadav


On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:05 PM, > wrote:

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
   ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
   ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great   New Offers
 from IPexpert (Angel Perez)
  2. QoS SRND - Page 105 (Berry, Matthew J.)
  3. LAB 5A Vol1 question 5.3 (kerboute kerboute)
  4. Re: about globalization and the lab's PSTN (Omotayo)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:16:27 +
From: Angel Perez 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security]
   Great   New Offers from IPexpert
To: , 
Cc: osl osl , nra...@gmail.com,
   bcarr...@ipexpert.com, tsc...@ipexpert.com
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"


Hi:



This is really a bad new...



Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:11:02 +0200
From: pauld.kru...@gmail.com
To: mthompson...@gmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; bcarr...@ipexpert.com; nra...@gmail.com 
; tsc...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL |  
CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert


Hi Mike,


While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know  
that you shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore.  
They've changed it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I  
can't vouch for the other tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass  
this section to pass the lab. Even if it is only 4 points. If you  
fail this and get full 96 points from the lab, you still fail.



Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the  
test harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was  
implemented already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.



On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson  
 wrote:





Everyone keeps talking about the ?free OEQ?, but they?re forgetting  
a key thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questions that  
are, if you?re actually prepared for the exam, elementary  
questions.  Each of these questions take a few minutes to answer on  
average.  I mean there isn?t much calculation to ?what is the TCP  
port used to control an IP Phone? (not an actual question I  
received).  It?s not like they want you to calculate the airspeed of  
an unlaiden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take less  
than 15 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and  
yes, it?s not really a head start, but you get the gist).  More  
importantly, you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or  
more points to get your number.


Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points  
per minute)

Or
465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).

Just my 2 cents folks



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Tyson Scott

Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
To: 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
Cc: 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL';  
ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL |  
CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert





But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.

Regards,

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on  
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training  
for the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)  
certification(s) with training locations throughout the United  
States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our  
online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public  
website at www.ipexpert.com



From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nadeem Rafi

Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
To: Brandon Carroll
Cc: CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Mike Thompson]

Everyone keeps talking about the 'free OEQ', but they're forgetting a key
thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questions that are, if you're
actually prepared for the exam, elementary questions.  Each of these
questions take a few minutes to answer on average.  I mean there isn't much
calculation to 'what is the TCP port used to control an IP Phone' (not an
actual question I received).  It's not like they want you to calculate the
airspeed of an unlaiden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take
less than 15 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and
yes, it's not really a head start, but you get the gist).  More importantly,
you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more points to get
your number.

 

Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points per
minute)

Or

465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).

 

Just my 2 cents folks

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Tyson Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
To: 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
Cc: 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL'; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com;
ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great
New Offers from IPexpert

 

But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP

Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130

 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
 

 

From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nadeem Rafi
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
To: Brandon Carroll
Cc: CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com;
ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from
IPexpert

 

a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll 
wrote:

Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
when you are preparing for the CCIE.



Regards,

Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
www.ipexpert.com



On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic 
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll 
wrote:
>> Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a student?
>> Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former
>> students point of viewWOW.  Unbelievable!
>
> Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically
> giving away this deal.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call Park

[Mike Thompson]

All that is needed is:
Ephone-dn XX
Number XXX (optional no-reg if in GK land)
Park-slot

U doing any CoR that would restrict access to the park slots?


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:35 AM, "Robert McGhee"   
wrote:



Hi All,



What’s required to get call park working in CME?  Ju 
st the Park Slots?  Anyone ever have the Park softkey show “inactive 
” and if so what was the resolution?




Thank you…

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert¹s Workbooks ­ ALL Completed and Shipping

[Mike Thompson]

Yeah, I assumed the same thing that if the workbooks would be ‘shipping’ next 
week that download would be available now.  I just sent a support email cause I 
can’t RTFM either.

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Wayne Lawson
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 3:38 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert¹s Workbooks ­ ALL Completed and 
Shipping

 

Jason - yes!!! (I know - about time, eyh!?! ;-)

Regards,

 

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244

Founder & President - IPexpert

Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130

 

::Message sent from iPhone::

 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S, 
Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service 
Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, 
Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at 
www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com. 


On Jan 23, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Jason Granat  wrote:

This is great news. Thank you! Will the complete workbooks be available for 
download on 1/29 as well? 

 

 

On Jan 23, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Amy Ryan wrote:





All, 

Check out the latest Blog by Wayne Lawson.  This is great news that many of you 
have been waiting for!

Best Regards, 
Amy

IPexpert’s Workbooks – ALL Completed and Shipping 

 

I’ve got great news to all of our aspiring CCIE candidates out there!  We’re 
pleased to announce that this coming Friday (the 29th) ALL of our CCIE 
workbooks will be shipping (most are available now, with just a few of them 
being wrapped up and completed!).  It’s been a long and challenging journey 
for us (due to all of the changes recently made on 3 of the CCIE Labs!), but 
our workbooks are finally overhauled and ready to ship!  I have to say, these 
are the most incredible technical products we’ve ever released!  Our team has 
worked nights, weekends and holidays – over the past year+ to overhaul every 
aspect of these workbooks, including the technical content, diagrams, detailed 
solutions and format – these are DEFINITELY second-to-none in quality and 
content!  I’m sure you’ll all agree – and I’m sure that our industry-standard 
workbooks will continue to receive amazing reviews when they’re in your hands.  
I’m quite optimistic that we’ll continue to add to the world’s largest list of 
CCIEs!   (Just count them! ;-)  You’ll 
be able to tell (by reading my descriptions below) how excited I am about these 
workbooks!  Here’s a summary of what we’ve done – and will have shipping on 
Friday (Note: all existing workbook & Blended Learning Solution customers will 
have these workbooks added to your member’s area automatically!):

CCIE Routing & Switching 4.0 
 

*   Volume 1: 

  Overhauled to include 4.0 topics / technology-focused lab scenarios w/ a 
Detailed Solution Guide.  There are 34 chapters (labs) covering all topics 
you’ll see on the new blueprint.  The Detailed Solution Guide walks you through 
the lab scenarios providing an in-depth overview of what’s happening and why 
you’re doing what’s asked. 
*   Volume 2: 

  This lab workbook has been overhauled to match the new 4.0 blueprint.  It’s a 
bridge between Volume 1 and Volume 3 – consisting of 20 8-hour multiprotocol 
labs (starting easier and getting progressively harder!).  There is an 
accompanying Detailed Solution Guide that walks you through each task – 
providing a thorough overview of how to configure each task. 
*   Volume 3: 

  This workbook is AMAZING!  Our clients who have been using this have provided 
awesome feedback!  They’re telling us that this workbook is “spot on” when it 
comes to the 4.0 lab.  Our clients are breezing through the OEQ and 
Troubleshooting sections (on the current 4.0 lab!).  This workbook consists of 
10 labs that are formatted to resemble the real and current 4.0 R&S lab.  
You’ll start out with OEQ and then move on to 10 Troubleshooting tickets – then 
the configuration section.  These are the real deal!  The Detailed Solution 
Guide is EXTREMELY thorough – and provides you with a wealth of information – 
so you’re able to fully understand these lab scenarios and our solutions!  Joe 
 , Tyson 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First lab attempt

[Mike Thompson]

They are NOT flexible. If it let u schedule it, it's a system glitch  
and it will prob bite u in te rear.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Erwan Erwan  wrote:


hi all,

Does anyone know if we have to sit for first lab within 18 months  
exactly ? or can be bit flexible , mean 1 or 2 weeks more than 18  
months


As I tried to schedule for lab , and the system take it , even after  
18 months period


Thks for answer..

Rgs

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto Register

[Mike Thompson]

If call mgr group has subscriber first, config it on sub and try it  
again


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jan 6, 2010, at 9:48 PM, "Robert McGhee"   
wrote:







Anybody know why auto-registration wouldn’t work?  It’s something  
I struggled with recently and couldn’t think of reason for it not wo 
rking.  I had it enabled on the publisher, I then entered the phones 
 manually which worked fine but that takes a bit longer and every se 
cond counts.




Thanks for any info!!!

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP

[Mike Thompson]

I'm sure they're going to bring in proctors, I know there are at least a few
in SJ.  They're probably just covering the existing lab dates and not
letting anyone schedule new labs until they're back up to staff.

Just a thought.

-Original Message-
From: Robert McGhee [mailto:bobwmcg...@verizon.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 7:59 PM
To: Hough, Earl; Mark Nigh; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP

Not sure I guess cisco is looking to replace howard in rtp, i'm sure you'll
be good to go. He said there were exams scheduled after he leaves that were
still happening

-Original Message-
From: Hough, Earl 
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 7:38 PM
To: Robert McGhee ; Mark Nigh
; Mike Thompson ;
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP

What about people that already had labs scheduled between January and July?
I have one scheduled in April and have received nothing in the way of
communication telling me that it has been cancelled due to the lab being
unavailable.

Earl Hough CCIE #16508 (R&S/Security)

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Robert McGhee
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:55 PM
To: Mark Nigh; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP

Yes it is, I just left the lab in rtp and that's exactly what howard said,
cisco needs to hire a new proctor for rtp

-Original Message-
From: Mark Nigh 
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:51 PM
To: Robert McGhee ; Mike Thompson
; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP

So San Jose is our only option until July 2010?



[The entire original message is not included]

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

[Mike Thompson]

Yeah, the print drive config definitely doesn't work.  It's in the process
for the way that IPX is building the PDF.  I am trying hard to understand
how printing a duplex job is a 'security' risk, but that one is apparently
above my pay grade :o)  I could only get it to work on the laser printer at
work where I could interactively set it to duplex all print jobs.  I went as
far as to harass Wayne Lawson about it, but it went nowhere.  That was 6
months or so ago.  

GL in your studies.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Randall Crumm
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 12:53 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

Thanks Mike. I was configuring the duplex setting in the GUI and it was not
working. I tested it with a Word doc and it worked, so it is related to the
.pdf file from IPX or the plug-in as Tech Support said.

Thanks,
Randall



-Original Message-
From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:47 AM
To: Randall Crumm; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

Randall,
   I don't remember if it was you that I emailed, but you can configure most
printers (that have an interactive display) and set ALL print jobs to duplex
on the printer.  Until completed, everything will obviously print in duplex,
but it addresses you issue.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Randall Crumm
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 12:23 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

IPX Technical Support just emailed me and said the Adobe plug-in does not
allow duplex printing. I don't know why.

Anyway, thanks for those who answered.

HTH,
Randall




-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:48 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Printing Proctor Labs (Randall Crumm)
   2. Re: CCIE Voice Written Exam Study Materials (Jeff Garvas)
   3. Re: Printing Proctor Labs (Amp)
   4. Re: Printing Proctor Labs (Mike Thompson)
   5. Re: CCIE Voice Written Exam Study Materials (Mike Thompson)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:26:17 -0800
From: Randall Crumm 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Printing Proctor Labs
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Message-ID:
<9473270a65ca67458d287f3da3c9f37d0ed5138...@exch-cms.hlit.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

HI,
Is it me or can you not print the Proctor Guides with a duplexer? I
configure it to use the duplexer and it is not working.

Thanks,

Randall Crumm | Voice and Network Engineer
Direct: (408) 490-6734 | Cell: (408) 507-2373
www.harmonicinc.com
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA8D5A.A432DBD0]

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100104/ef7027b
9/attachment-0001.htm 
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6607 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url :
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100104/ef7027b
9/attachment-0001.jpg 

--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:02:00 -0500
From: Jeff Garvas 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Written Exam Study
Materials
To: A A 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID:
<3f94dfab1001041702m3aae8b1cldecb5bc236138...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Woops.  Reading the list before coffee in the morning :)   Glad someone
caught that, I was away from my email most of the day.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:57 PM, A A  wrote:

>  The link you posted is for the CCNA Voice QRSs.
>
> I'm sure you mean this one
> http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587053330
>
>
> ---

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

[Mike Thompson]

Randall,
   I don't remember if it was you that I emailed, but you can configure most
printers (that have an interactive display) and set ALL print jobs to duplex
on the printer.  Until completed, everything will obviously print in duplex,
but it addresses you issue.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Randall Crumm
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 12:23 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

IPX Technical Support just emailed me and said the Adobe plug-in does not
allow duplex printing. I don't know why.

Anyway, thanks for those who answered.

HTH,
Randall




-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:48 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Printing Proctor Labs (Randall Crumm)
   2. Re: CCIE Voice Written Exam Study Materials (Jeff Garvas)
   3. Re: Printing Proctor Labs (Amp)
   4. Re: Printing Proctor Labs (Mike Thompson)
   5. Re: CCIE Voice Written Exam Study Materials (Mike Thompson)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:26:17 -0800
From: Randall Crumm 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Printing Proctor Labs
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Message-ID:
<9473270a65ca67458d287f3da3c9f37d0ed5138...@exch-cms.hlit.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

HI,
Is it me or can you not print the Proctor Guides with a duplexer? I
configure it to use the duplexer and it is not working.

Thanks,

Randall Crumm | Voice and Network Engineer
Direct: (408) 490-6734 | Cell: (408) 507-2373
www.harmonicinc.com
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA8D5A.A432DBD0]

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100104/ef7027b
9/attachment-0001.htm 
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6607 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url :
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100104/ef7027b
9/attachment-0001.jpg 

--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:02:00 -0500
From: Jeff Garvas 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Written Exam Study
Materials
To: A A 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID:
<3f94dfab1001041702m3aae8b1cldecb5bc236138...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Woops.  Reading the list before coffee in the morning :)   Glad someone
caught that, I was away from my email most of the day.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:57 PM, A A  wrote:

>  The link you posted is for the CCNA Voice QRSs.
>
> I'm sure you mean this one
> http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587053330
>
>
> --
> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:51:23 -0500
> From: j...@cia.net
> To: kck...@yahoo.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Written Exam Study Materials
>
> I found the quick reference sheets to be very helpful after I missed the
> first attempt by a few points.
>
> http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587057670
>
> Its an adobe ebook but you can print it if you prefer to read from paper.
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Ken Kov  wrote:
>
>   Does anyone have suggestions for study material for the latest CCIE
> Voice written exam? - Not places like Test King , etc.
>
> Thanks,
> Ken
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> --
> New! Receive and respond to mail from other email accounts from within
> Hotmail Find out how. <http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394593/direct/01/>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100104/30ce5ea
5/attac

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP

[Mike Thompson]

They must be planning an overhaul of some sort, problem is isolated to RTP
and I had the same issue.

 

I guess it just validates that you're not crazy.or is it that we're BOTH
crazy.choice is yours.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Nigh
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:46 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP

 

I went to schedule my lab date (voice) in RTP and the earliest date is July
2nd, 2010. Does anyone know what is going on? Right before the holiday, I
was able to get the end of January?


Thanks.

 

Mark Nigh
Systems Engineer

  mn...@netelligent.com

(p) 314.392.6926
  img_moreThan

 

 

 

Mark Nigh
Systems Engineer

  mn...@netelligent.com

(p) 314.392.6926
  img_moreThan

 

 

  _  

This transmission and any attached files are privileged, confidential or
otherwise the exclusive property of the intended recipient or Netelligent
Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to
this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, please contact us immediately by responding to this
message or by telephone (314-392-6900) and promptly destroy the original
transmission and its attachments.

<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Written Exam Study Materials

[Mike Thompson]

Don't judge Jeff.there's still useful information in those noob books J

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:02 PM
To: A A
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Written Exam Study Materials

 

Woops.  Reading the list before coffee in the morning :)   Glad someone
caught that, I was away from my email most of the day.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:57 PM, A A  wrote:

The link you posted is for the CCNA Voice QRSs. 
 
I'm sure you mean this one
http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587053330
 
 

  _  

Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:51:23 -0500
From: j...@cia.net
To: kck...@yahoo.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Written Exam Study Materials

I found the quick reference sheets to be very helpful after I missed the
first attempt by a few points.

http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587057670

Its an adobe ebook but you can print it if you prefer to read from paper.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Ken Kov  wrote:


Does anyone have suggestions for study material for the latest CCIE Voice
written exam? - Not places like Test King , etc.

 

Thanks,

Ken



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com  

 

  _  

New! Receive and respond to mail from other email accounts from within
Hotmail Find out how.  

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Printing Proctor Labs

[Mike Thompson]

Due to a security setting in Adobe (a miss by IPX is my thought, because it
worked in the old version) that is preventing the printing in duplex.
Essentially the setting is ignored, so if you have a configuration interface
on your printer (not from the software driver in windows, OS X, etc), that's
where you need to do it.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:04 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Printing Proctor Labs

Hey Randall,
I had the same problem that you have but I was able to resolve the  
issue by not only setting the duplex setting in Adobe Reader but in  
the settings of the printer as well. Hope that helps...

Amp

Quoting Randall Crumm :

> HI,
> Is it me or can you not print the Proctor Guides with a duplexer? I   
> configure it to use the duplexer and it is not working.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Randall Crumm | Voice and Network Engineer
> Direct: (408) 490-6734 | Cell: (408) 507-2373
> www.harmonicinc.com
> [cid:image001.jpg@01CA8D5A.A432DBD0]
>
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPExpert - Chock up Another Winner!

[Mike Thompson]

Sure, send me a money order for $1 and you pay the legal fees for  
copyright infringement.

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Nov 21, 2009, at 5:31 PM, kerboute naoufal   
wrote:

> Hi Experts,
>
> Can any one share with me IP Expert Voice LAB Vol2??
>
> Kind Regards.
>
> *Naoufal Kerboute
> Technical Project Manager UC*
>
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volumme 2 lab 5

[Mike Thompson]

Actually that looks like before that point.  Make sure that you have  
dsp services dspfarm configured under the voice card.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Oct 16, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Michael Ciarfello  
 wrote:


Normal now in later IOS versions.  Reminding you the rsvp keyword  
has not been configured.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Omotayo  
[adefilabi...@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:38 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volumme 2 lab 5

Hello,
When i try to configure the mtp i keep getting the information below
dspfarm profile 1 mtp
 rpm_user_create_profile_entry :: Resource provider not registered
Any ideas
THANKS

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Omotayo   
wrote:

Hello,
i configured the lab as required, but when i try to cal from HQ to  
any branch. i get Not enough Bandwidth even when i press the message  
button

Any one with an idea of how to fix this

Also, on the branch two router i have TRANSCODER and MTP as  
configured. the transcoder registered with the UCM but the MTP has  
failed to

sccp local Loopback0
sccp ccm 10.10.210.10 identifier 2
sccp ccm 10.10.210.11 identifier 1
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
 bind interface Loopback0
 associate ccm 1 priority 1
 associate ccm 2 priority 2
 associate profile 2 register br2-rsvp-agent
 associate profile 1 register xcoder
!
dspfarm profile 1 transcode
 codec g711ulaw
 codec g711alaw
 codec g729ar8
 codec g729abr8
 maximum sessions 4
 associate application SCCP
!
dspfarm profile 2 mtp
 codec pass-through
 codec g729r8
 rsvp
 maximum sessions software 4
 associate application SCCP

Thanks for the antcipated support

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SNR issue: vol 2 lab 4, 3.1

[Mike Thompson]

Is the location set on the GW?

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Oct 7, 2009, at 6:46 AM, "Aamir Panjwani" > wrote:


ok finally spending hour on it and going through CCM traces I found  
it was “out of bandwidth” issue because I had location set to  
48K. However, I can’t understand how can this be a bandwidth issue i 
n the following scenario:




call from hqph1 5001 to hqph2 5002 it rings on mobile (PSTN line 2)  
after 2 seconds as per normal.  Answer the call at the hqph2, press  
mobility soft key then select “send call to mobile” nothing  
happens. Changed the HQ location bandwidth to 80K and it starts work 
ing




Now given that gateway, calling number 5001 and called number 5002  
are in same HQ location and on top of that I have got a dedicated  
route pattern just for SNR which routes the call out of hq gateway  
only then how come location bandwidth is kicking in










From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani

Sent: Wednesday, 7 October 2009 8:19 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SNR issue: vol 2 lab 4, 3.1



I have configured SNR few times but this time I have got weird  
problem. Call from any phone to HQ ph2 5002 it rings out to mobile  
(PSTN line 2) after 2 seconds as per requirement. I can hang up on  
mobile and can resume the call on HQ ph2 . However, when I click  
mobility softkey on HQ ph2 and select “send call to mobile phone”  
nothing happens at all. Then I press mobility softkey again and this 
 time softkey wouldn’t work as well.




Doubled checked the config but don’t see any problem…has anyone  
come across this issue before?






thanks






__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab blueprint question

[Mike Thompson]

The Lab 4 reference is solely because they have you exit CUE to an external
number and then queue the call.  BACD is the only mechanism (barring a UCCX
/ CME implementation) to implement call queueing in IOS / CME.   I won't
play spoiler, but they have you do BACD pretty extensively if you read
through carefully.

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 9:22 PM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab blueprint question

 

Someone just mentioned that BACD is on Vol 2 Lab 4 (which I'm getting ready
to do), I must have missed it when I reviewed the mock labs this morning.

 

I hope mock labs 6 - 10 more accurately reflect the material on the exam,
not that I mind spending training time on 40 things that won't be on the
lab.  And, honestly, if it's not on the blueprint I don't know how someone
can say that it might still be on the test.  No mention of BACD (maybe it's
called something else.)



 

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Michael Ciarfello 
wrote:

One (or more, I haven't done them all yet.) have BACD.  (I'm pretty sure.
The lab I'm working on seems to imply it's looking for BACD.  I just quickly
read the test and am working on other sections.  I just put on my quick
notes to prepare for BACD.  Looks like they snuck in some implied AAR which
I didn't pickup on with my initial read and I've had to waste time to go
back and reconfigure or visit objects again.)

 

For other topics not covered, I think anything is game.

Run through the CCME Admin guide, SRND, etc and pickup other topics (MLPP,
E911, voiceview, etc.)  NO ONE ever talked about MLPP for instance in the v2
days. Doesn't mean it won't be on the test.  Ipexpert doesn't seem to have
call monitoring and recording.  Security was said to be a testable topic by
Ben Ng during the last Ask the Expert.  

 

I would run through at least once topics that SEEM to have a low probability
of being on the exam and know how to quickly find the documentation.  

  _  

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
[shikam...@kagadis.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 11:05 AM 


To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab blueprint question

 

I'm looking through the mock labs to find topics that weren't covered in
labs 1 & 2 (Presence and BACD, namely).  I noticed a couple of things and
need a reality check;

 

- There's a problem in mock lab 5, it looks like it's combining lab 4 and 5
in the lab 5 pdf.  Is it just me?  (Other than that, looks like lab 5 has
all six sections.)

 

- The Cisco lab blueprint doesn't seem to mention BACD on CME and the mock
labs don't have any BACD sections either.  The only instance of BACD seems
to be in the volume 1 material.  Does this necessarily mean that it's not a
covered topic in the lab?

 

- In preparation for my upcoming boot camp, I've been working through mock
labs and taking extensive notes so that I can work on speed and memorization
in the last 3 1/2 months of preparation.  I think mock labs 1,2 and 4 should
cover all of the known topics (1, 2, and 3 don't cover Presence.)  Are there
any sections that cover CME integration with CUCM?  I couldn't find any.  



-- 
-Shikamaru






-- 
-Shikamaru

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Documentation

[Mike Thompson]

Only copy I found so far is buried in the CUE area and it's a dead link for
BACD for CME3.3.

 

 

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 10:05 PM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: BACD Documentation

 

Has anyone found good BACD documentation in the Cisco Documentation pages
(the one's we'll have access to during the lab).  I'm not going to remember
a lot of these details and I don't want to risk not having the Read Me to
refer to.  Problem is that I get into the TCL script area (voice/Comm
Infrastructure/voice GW/TCL) it doesn't give any of the BACD documentation,
it's general TCL programming info.

 

Any better leads??  I'm taking the test Monday, so anything would be GREATLY
appreciated.

 

MT

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Documentation

[Mike Thompson]

Has anyone found good BACD documentation in the Cisco Documentation pages
(the one's we'll have access to during the lab).  I'm not going to remember
a lot of these details and I don't want to risk not having the Read Me to
refer to.  Problem is that I get into the TCL script area (voice/Comm
Infrastructure/voice GW/TCL) it doesn't give any of the BACD documentation,
it's general TCL programming info.

 

Any better leads??  I'm taking the test Monday, so anything would be GREATLY
appreciated.

 

MT

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] just wanted to let you all know

[Mike Thompson]

Both, but 79X1 phones will do it properly. Marks comment about the  
7961 was about the IP Blue in 7961 phone, and not a testiment of the  
7961 itself.

I'm short, you're fine. The globalized 'storage' of numbers won't  
occur on cme anyway since there is no database to hold the number.

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Oct 1, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Mark Holloway  wrote:

> I haven't looked, but is globalization in the labs required for the
> CME phones or just UCM7 phones?  I have 7961's for CME and HQ/BR1 has
> 7962 phones
>
> On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Mark Snow wrote:
>
>> Neither CIPC, IPBlue (even as a 7961), nor any Gen 2 or older phone
>> (7960, 7940, etc) support Globalization for Call History lists. This
>> is due to the fact that all of these devices store the Call History
>> local on the phone (or computer in case of CIPC/IPBlue software) -
>> rather than with the Gen 3 phones, all of the Call History lists are
>> stored in the DB on the CUCM server - rather than on the local phone.
>> And since the number is globalized on the CUCM, it is always  
>> preserved
>> there as the globalized number. It is Localized *before* being handed
>> off to the actual IP Phone, and therefore the devices that store that
>> information locally - cannot inherently support globalization in any
>> form.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> -- 
>> Mark Snow
>> CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
>>
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Fax: +1.309.413.4097
>> Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
>> --
>> Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
>> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
>> --
>> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video- 
>> On-
>> Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S
>> Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab  
>> and
>> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Michael Ciarfello wrote:
>>
>>> While you're all playing with CIPC and engaging in bad touch can you
>>> see if localization works? Reports from two people so far that the
>>> number will show localized on the phone display, but not show the
>>> E164 number in the call lists (like the restriction on the 40/60.)
>>> Whatever shows on the phone display shows in the call lists.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-
>>> boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Peter Slow
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:31 AM
>>> To: OSL Group
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] just wanted to let you all know
>>>
>>> ...That even though your CIPC may LOOK like a 7975, trying to  
>>> press a
>>> button on the screen with your finger only results in a smudge on
>>> your
>>> PC's LCD panel.
>>>
>>> Not that I just tried that.
>>>
>>> -Peter
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] just wanted to let you all know

[Mike Thompson]

Peter,
I tell you what...not sure what time zone you're in (saying that
because your email came in at 1:30am), so I'm not judging.

You might want to close the book and get to sleep :)

Thank you for that by the way.  Laughing my ass off to start the day is a
REAL good start :)

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Peter Slow
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:31 AM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] just wanted to let you all know

...That even though your CIPC may LOOK like a 7975, trying to press a
button on the screen with your finger only results in a smudge on your
PC's LCD panel.

Not that I just tried that.

-Peter
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Mike Thompson]

I agree, there should be a LOT more output to a RSVP ALL debug.

 

I had the same issue when I first configured it.  my issue was that my ip
rspv bandwidth 112 statement didn't 'stick' when I first configured it
(likely a user entry error due to long lab hours).  Once I corrected that,
it worked fine.

 

If I recall, I was getting a similar message initially.

 

From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:54 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I am not an RSVP debug expert, but I think this is what's getting you.
There should also be a LOT more output.

Do you have ip rsvp command on all interfaces in the path?  Bandwidth on the
WAN interfaces you want to subtract from.

 

Sep 30 04:34:03.166: RSVP-MSG: 10.10.101.1 _17284->10.10.200.3
_17888[0.0.0.0]: no matching path state for Resv

  _  

From: Aamir Panjwani [aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:49 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

Please see attached output of "debug ip rsvp all" from HQ and BR1 side

 

Test call was made from HQ to BR1

 

From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 2:25 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

Do you get output if do debug ip rsvp all?

 

  _  

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
[aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:22 AM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

Yep all registered in their own MRG/MRGL..location bandwidth resync didn't
make any difference.

 

Restarted CCM service too...only thing left is to reboot the gateways

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:48 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

So they're all registered.

 

Each of them is in their own MRG, etc.

 

Did you do a resync bandwidth after making any Location changes?

 

From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

show sccp output below

 

HQ

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization
Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

BR1

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization
Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

 

 

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:11 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time
not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough bandwidth"
on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't pickup anything
obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both
MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I
set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Mike Thompson]

So they're all registered.

 

Each of them is in their own MRG, etc.

 

Did you do a resync bandwidth after making any Location changes?

 

From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

show sccp output below

 

HQ

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization
Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

BR1

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization
Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

 

 

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:11 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time
not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough bandwidth"
on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't pickup anything
obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both
MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I
set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video bandwidth
set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

*

 

sccp local Vlan230

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface Vlan230

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Mike Thompson]

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time
not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough bandwidth"
on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't pickup anything
obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both
MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I
set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video bandwidth
set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

*

 

sccp local Vlan230

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface Vlan230

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

[Mike Thompson]

Guys, don't forget that in the 'my configs' section on the IPExpert page,
there is a working config for each lab.  Within those configs are the
configs to emulate the PSTN router that includes the PSTN and WAN Frame
Relay configuration.

 

Anyone taking this exam should be able to modify that configuration to suit
their needs (maybe not build it from scratch in a short afternoon, but at
least modify it).

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:12 AM
To: anupam TYAGI
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

 

I'm using a 2821 (borrowed from work).  Two ports need to terminate T1 PRIs
from HQ and BR1, the other port needs to terminate an E1 from BR2.  After
you put it together, you'll be spending time configuring dial peers that
work with the IPexpert labs but it works like a dream after everything's
done.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:54 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

Hi , 

 

I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,

 

Thanks 

Anu


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com  






-- 
-Shikamaru

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

[Mike Thompson]

Pretty much the exact thing I did.  Since I had a glut of VWIC-2MFT and no
VWIC2-2MFT floating around the lab, I just went the route of assuming a Euro
PRI would be T-1 format.  As long as in your mind you keep track of the
difference in the lab (D channel being on 16 vs 23, linecoding / framing
differences), there really isn't any difference.  This is of course until
they get E1-R2 back into the mix, but Ben has pretty much stated (based off
Networkers and different VoD products) that E1 CAS won't be in the lab in
the near future.

 

Just my two pennies.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:35 AM
To: anupam TYAGI
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

 

I used a 2811 just because they were available here at work.

I have a combination of VWIC2-xMFT-T1/E1 cards populated in it aligned with
the ipexpert configuration for the PSTN router so I can paste their PSTN
configuration into my PSTN router without having to make too many
modifications.

It may not be the most cost effective solution for a home lab.

-jeff

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

Hi , 

 

I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,

 

Thanks 

Anu


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

[Mike Thompson]

No, that’s the key thing.  But the problem is that CIR defaults to ½ of the
port speed (1/2 of 56k), so you’re pulling a lot of traffic across a 28k
link.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:17 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

 

Aamir,

I haven't bought the second volume yet and you have me scratching my head.
Is it something other / more significant than FRTS defaulting to 56k?  

-Jeff



On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Aamir Panjwani
 wrote:

Please refer to ipexpert vol 2 lab 3 question 5.3 for answer to this
particular problem.

That explains why CUE goes crazy when QOS is only configured on one PVC...





-Original Message-
From: ccieid1ot [mailto:ccieid...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 28 September 2009 11:40 PM
To: Cisco Dave
Cc: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

Make sure it's on both sides if you enable it.  You will need it for
QOS anyways.

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Cisco Dave  wrote:
> Yes, it was a misplaced command as seen here below. Removing that one
> command resolved my issue.
>
> interface Serial0/1/0:0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> no fair-queue
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
>
> -Dave
>
> 
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:44:43 +1000
> From: aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
> To: ciscod...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> Dave,
>
>
>
> Are  you saying that you had to remove  "frame-relay traffic shaping"
> command from the physical interface?
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> From: Cisco Dave [mailto:ciscod...@live.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 26 September 2009 8:07 AM
> To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
>
>
>
> I put a base config on both routers and ended up with the same situation.
> After a closer look I noticed a shaping command on the HQ router.  All is
> working great after removing that statement.
>
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction,
> cd
>
>
> 
>
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:17:13 +1000
> From: aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
> To: ciscod...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> It seems to happen when you have QOS setup on one of the PVC's.  remove
all
> the QOS config and try again
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cisco Dave
> Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 6:13 PM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
>
>
>
> When setting up CUE and integrating it with CallManager my remote site
> bandwidth is choked.  Dial tone on my phones if very slow.  The
integration
> itself seems to timeout.  It takes me several attempts and it is very
> slooow, pings timeout or are 2 to 3 seconds.
>
> Anyone having the same issue or any thought on getting around this?  Since
> there is nothing else on the network I really did not expect this type of
> behavior.
>
> Thanks,
> cd
>
> 
>
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 
>
> Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits. Check
> it out.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 

> Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web. Try Bing(tm) now

> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Device Mobility

[Mike Thompson]

Only place I know off hand is at the phone itself.

 

You can click on the link next to the line where you set the mobility mode.
It says 'view current device mobility settings'.

 

No less of a pain that calling out, but you can see all the info there.

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 11:39 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Device Mobility

 

Guys,

 

I have configured Device Mobility and Local Route Lists and have them both
working very nicely with one another.  My question is pretty simply but I
cannot figure out where to do it.  Is there a place in CUCM ( probably in
Real Time Monitoring Tool ) where you can see what phones are physically
roaming and to which DMI and DMG they are roaming in?  

 

I am testing my calls on the gateway now to see which gateway the calls are
going out, but it's getting cumbersome...

 

Thanks,

 

Alex

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

[Mike Thompson]

DAMN IT JIM!  THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING OF!

 

Thank you Brian!!!

 

NO, you absolutely can NOT transcode multicast.  It was the exact opposite,
you can't use a transcoder.you NEED to set the serv param to allow g.729
natively.

 

Sorry for the Engineering Olympics Nara, I had a little cranial - rectal
inversion.

 

From: Brian Valentine [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:50 PM
To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'Nara Shikamaru'
Cc: 'OSL Group'
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

Can we even transcode a multicast moh feed?  

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mike Thompson
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:46 PM
To: 'Nara Shikamaru'
Cc: 'OSL Group'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

No, if you set that Ent Param, it allowed the MoH to stream it natively, no
longer requiring transcoding.

 

There's something in the back of my head nagging that there's an issue when
you enable native G.729 in MoH.  basically, if you have it stream g.729
natively that there's something else that doesn't work.  I can't think of it
off hand though.

 

If I'm thinking of something else (and it doesn't break anything) and the
lab doesn't specifically state that transcoding must be invoked.then there's
no issue doing it.

 

From: Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:42 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

The MRG doesn't have a transcoder in it.

 

Maybe I'm overthinking this.  Phones in each site speak G711 amonst
themselves but G729 when the stream is intersite.  There wouldn't be any
transcoding taking place because point-to-point they're speaking the same
codec, right?

 

When I do a show sccp connections (as Aamir suggested), nothing shouws up,
no sessions.  When I configured the Enterprise parameter to allow MOH to use
g729, is that transcoding anything as well?

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Mike Thompson 
wrote:

If you look at the MOH server that is being called by the HQ phone, it has a
MRGL assigned to it.


That MRGL will have a transcoder in it.  that (those) transcoder(s) will be
used in order of precedence that they occur in the MRGL, top to bottom.

 

That being said, I would assume that the MOH referred to in the HQ MRGL is
using HQ transcoders.  If you session into the HQ router, there will be a
variety of show SCCP options.  That will give you a lot of insight into how
the DSP Farm resources are being utilized (for MTP/RSVP, for Xcode, for
conference, etc).

 

Poke around in there, it has very valuable info.

 

From: Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:27 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

I think I was distracted when I originally sent out this thread, sorry about
that.  Yes, that sounds right, the transcode should happen on the HQ side
before the stream is sent to the phone on hold at BR1.  One question,
though.  Now that MOH is working, I'd like to verify that the transcoding is
taking place (clearly, it is I know).  I don't have a transcoder configured
on CUCM, but I have one set up on the HQ gateway to handle calls g711/g729
calls going to the gateway.  Is this transcoder being used for MOH (it would
have to be, right?)  How do I verify?/

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Mike Thompson 
wrote:

Someone jump in if I get this incorrect:

 

Nara,

   You're a little off in the MoH logic.  The way MOH and MRGL
works together goes like this.

 

HQ and BR1 are in a call.

   BR1 hits hold (a user hold).  The BR1 phone MRGL is accessed
to find the MoH to be played to the HQ phone.  We'll call that MoH resource,
MoH-BR1.  This one is working fine, right?  

   If HQ hits hold, the HQ phone MRGL is accessed to look a MoH
resource, MoH-HQ.  This is where the issue services, because it needs to
transcode to get over to BR1, right?  The MRGL of the MoH-HQ resource is the
accessed (THIS IS THE KEY) to look for a transcoder.  If the MoH-HQ MRGL
doesn't have a transcoder, it won't be able to convert to G.729 to get over
to BR1.

 

Check for transcoder resources applied to MoH-HQ.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:46 PM 


To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

Working through the Media section of this lab, I'm having what I think is a
transcoding problem with MOH.  All RTP streams across WAN, in this lab, are
g729.  MOH works okay for HQ but not for BR1.  If HQ phone calls the BR1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

[Mike Thompson]

No, if you set that Ent Param, it allowed the MoH to stream it natively, no
longer requiring transcoding.

 

There's something in the back of my head nagging that there's an issue when
you enable native G.729 in MoH.  basically, if you have it stream g.729
natively that there's something else that doesn't work.  I can't think of it
off hand though.

 

If I'm thinking of something else (and it doesn't break anything) and the
lab doesn't specifically state that transcoding must be invoked.then there's
no issue doing it.

 

From: Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:42 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

The MRG doesn't have a transcoder in it.

 

Maybe I'm overthinking this.  Phones in each site speak G711 amonst
themselves but G729 when the stream is intersite.  There wouldn't be any
transcoding taking place because point-to-point they're speaking the same
codec, right?

 

When I do a show sccp connections (as Aamir suggested), nothing shouws up,
no sessions.  When I configured the Enterprise parameter to allow MOH to use
g729, is that transcoding anything as well?

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Mike Thompson 
wrote:

If you look at the MOH server that is being called by the HQ phone, it has a
MRGL assigned to it.


That MRGL will have a transcoder in it.  that (those) transcoder(s) will be
used in order of precedence that they occur in the MRGL, top to bottom.

 

That being said, I would assume that the MOH referred to in the HQ MRGL is
using HQ transcoders.  If you session into the HQ router, there will be a
variety of show SCCP options.  That will give you a lot of insight into how
the DSP Farm resources are being utilized (for MTP/RSVP, for Xcode, for
conference, etc).

 

Poke around in there, it has very valuable info.

 

From: Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:27 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

I think I was distracted when I originally sent out this thread, sorry about
that.  Yes, that sounds right, the transcode should happen on the HQ side
before the stream is sent to the phone on hold at BR1.  One question,
though.  Now that MOH is working, I'd like to verify that the transcoding is
taking place (clearly, it is I know).  I don't have a transcoder configured
on CUCM, but I have one set up on the HQ gateway to handle calls g711/g729
calls going to the gateway.  Is this transcoder being used for MOH (it would
have to be, right?)  How do I verify?/

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Mike Thompson 
wrote:

Someone jump in if I get this incorrect:

 

Nara,

   You're a little off in the MoH logic.  The way MOH and MRGL
works together goes like this.

 

HQ and BR1 are in a call.

   BR1 hits hold (a user hold).  The BR1 phone MRGL is accessed
to find the MoH to be played to the HQ phone.  We'll call that MoH resource,
MoH-BR1.  This one is working fine, right?  

   If HQ hits hold, the HQ phone MRGL is accessed to look a MoH
resource, MoH-HQ.  This is where the issue services, because it needs to
transcode to get over to BR1, right?  The MRGL of the MoH-HQ resource is the
accessed (THIS IS THE KEY) to look for a transcoder.  If the MoH-HQ MRGL
doesn't have a transcoder, it won't be able to convert to G.729 to get over
to BR1.

 

Check for transcoder resources applied to MoH-HQ.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:46 PM 


To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

Working through the Media section of this lab, I'm having what I think is a
transcoding problem with MOH.  All RTP streams across WAN, in this lab, are
g729.  MOH works okay for HQ but not for BR1.  If HQ phone calls the BR1
phone and BR1 presses hold, music plays on HQ.  If the opposite happens (BR1
is placed on hold by HQ), there is tone-on-hold.  If I change the region
setting so that traffic between sites is g711, moh works fine.  That sounds
like a transcoding problem.  I've configured a transcoder on the BR1 gateway
and registered it to CUCM, but still no dice.  Anyone know where the issue
might be?

 

Also, I am aware that question 7.3 requires unicast moh off of the local
moh.au file on flash, but I'd like to get this working before moving on to
that section just for the sake of education.



-- 
-Shikamaru






-- 
-Shikamaru






-- 
-Shikamaru

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

[Mike Thompson]

If you look at the MOH server that is being called by the HQ phone, it has a
MRGL assigned to it.


That MRGL will have a transcoder in it.  that (those) transcoder(s) will be
used in order of precedence that they occur in the MRGL, top to bottom.

 

That being said, I would assume that the MOH referred to in the HQ MRGL is
using HQ transcoders.  If you session into the HQ router, there will be a
variety of show SCCP options.  That will give you a lot of insight into how
the DSP Farm resources are being utilized (for MTP/RSVP, for Xcode, for
conference, etc).

 

Poke around in there, it has very valuable info.

 

From: Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:27 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

I think I was distracted when I originally sent out this thread, sorry about
that.  Yes, that sounds right, the transcode should happen on the HQ side
before the stream is sent to the phone on hold at BR1.  One question,
though.  Now that MOH is working, I'd like to verify that the transcoding is
taking place (clearly, it is I know).  I don't have a transcoder configured
on CUCM, but I have one set up on the HQ gateway to handle calls g711/g729
calls going to the gateway.  Is this transcoder being used for MOH (it would
have to be, right?)  How do I verify?/

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Mike Thompson 
wrote:

Someone jump in if I get this incorrect:

 

Nara,

   You're a little off in the MoH logic.  The way MOH and MRGL
works together goes like this.

 

HQ and BR1 are in a call.

   BR1 hits hold (a user hold).  The BR1 phone MRGL is accessed
to find the MoH to be played to the HQ phone.  We'll call that MoH resource,
MoH-BR1.  This one is working fine, right?  

   If HQ hits hold, the HQ phone MRGL is accessed to look a MoH
resource, MoH-HQ.  This is where the issue services, because it needs to
transcode to get over to BR1, right?  The MRGL of the MoH-HQ resource is the
accessed (THIS IS THE KEY) to look for a transcoder.  If the MoH-HQ MRGL
doesn't have a transcoder, it won't be able to convert to G.729 to get over
to BR1.

 

Check for transcoder resources applied to MoH-HQ.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:46 PM 


To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

Working through the Media section of this lab, I'm having what I think is a
transcoding problem with MOH.  All RTP streams across WAN, in this lab, are
g729.  MOH works okay for HQ but not for BR1.  If HQ phone calls the BR1
phone and BR1 presses hold, music plays on HQ.  If the opposite happens (BR1
is placed on hold by HQ), there is tone-on-hold.  If I change the region
setting so that traffic between sites is g711, moh works fine.  That sounds
like a transcoding problem.  I've configured a transcoder on the BR1 gateway
and registered it to CUCM, but still no dice.  Anyone know where the issue
might be?

 

Also, I am aware that question 7.3 requires unicast moh off of the local
moh.au file on flash, but I'd like to get this working before moving on to
that section just for the sake of education.



-- 
-Shikamaru






-- 
-Shikamaru

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal calls between all phones should dispaly 4 digit

[Mike Thompson]

No, if you uncheck that box it will NOT refer back to the DP.

 

My thought was configure it on the phone and uncheck that box (as a test).

 

NOTE:  if you do configure it on the phone, but leave the box
checked..whatever is on the Device Pool will interfere with what's
configured on the phone.

 

From: ABIOLA ADEFILA [mailto:adefilabi...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:30 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal calls between all phones should
dispaly 4 digit

 

Hello,

You mean i should uncheck the Use Device Pool Calling Party Transformation
CSS and leave the one on the device pool?

Regards

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Mike Thompson 
wrote:

Did you try applying it at the phone and unchecking the Device Pool box?

 

Just as a comparison.EITHER one of those options SHOULD work.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ABIOLA ADEFILA
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:46 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal calls between all phones should dispaly
4 digit

 

Hello,

i passed all internal calls throught a translation pattern so as to expand
the ANI , testing it shows the full E.164 number in the missed and received
directory

 

in order for it to show 4 digit, i configured the calling party
transformation pattern and applied it to the device pool, yes it showed 4
digit but the missed/received calls are not showing the full E.164 anylonger

 

Anyone with an idea of how to fix this

 

Regards

 

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

[Mike Thompson]

Someone jump in if I get this incorrect:

 

Nara,

   You're a little off in the MoH logic.  The way MOH and MRGL
works together goes like this.

 

HQ and BR1 are in a call.

   BR1 hits hold (a user hold).  The BR1 phone MRGL is accessed
to find the MoH to be played to the HQ phone.  We'll call that MoH resource,
MoH-BR1.  This one is working fine, right?  

   If HQ hits hold, the HQ phone MRGL is accessed to look a MoH
resource, MoH-HQ.  This is where the issue services, because it needs to
transcode to get over to BR1, right?  The MRGL of the MoH-HQ resource is the
accessed (THIS IS THE KEY) to look for a transcoder.  If the MoH-HQ MRGL
doesn't have a transcoder, it won't be able to convert to G.729 to get over
to BR1.

 

Check for transcoder resources applied to MoH-HQ.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:46 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X

 

Working through the Media section of this lab, I'm having what I think is a
transcoding problem with MOH.  All RTP streams across WAN, in this lab, are
g729.  MOH works okay for HQ but not for BR1.  If HQ phone calls the BR1
phone and BR1 presses hold, music plays on HQ.  If the opposite happens (BR1
is placed on hold by HQ), there is tone-on-hold.  If I change the region
setting so that traffic between sites is g711, moh works fine.  That sounds
like a transcoding problem.  I've configured a transcoder on the BR1 gateway
and registered it to CUCM, but still no dice.  Anyone know where the issue
might be?

 

Also, I am aware that question 7.3 requires unicast moh off of the local
moh.au file on flash, but I'd like to get this working before moving on to
that section just for the sake of education.



-- 
-Shikamaru

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab scoring

[Mike Thompson]

To further on Craig's point.  It is a 'strategy' for those very weak in an
area, say UCCX, to totally skip an area and hope that they ace other
sections to make up for it.

 

Definitely not something I would recommend since most of us will not ace
sections on this exam due to the complexity of what is presented.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Craig Staffin
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:55 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab scoring

 

it is 80% overall NOT per section.



On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Aamir Panjwani
 wrote:

Hi Folks,

 

My understanding is to pass the voice lab we have to score not only 80% in
total but also must score 80% in each individual section. Say for example if
the lab consist of 10 sections and my score is 75% in a particular section
but my overall average score is 90% that would still be a fail??

 

Someone told me recently above is not true and we only need to score 80%
overall...can anyone please confirm if you know for sure..

 

thanks

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab scoring

[Mike Thompson]

And to be more specific, you need to get 80 POINTS total.

 

The reason that's important is that the 'Open Ended Questions' are worth 21
of your TOTAL available points.  If you don't get 3 out of 4, you only are
CAPABLE of getting 79 points (a failing grade).  If you get the OEQ correct,
you get 21 'freebies' out of your 100.

 

That means that out of your questions in the lab, you only need to get 59
total points (plus your OEQ 21) to reach your 80 point plateau of passing.

 

Now, Cisco did of course make up for that by making the questions worth a
little less (those 4 point questions in the last version are now worth 3).

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Craig Staffin
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 7:55 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab scoring

 

it is 80% overall NOT per section.



On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Aamir Panjwani
 wrote:

Hi Folks,

 

My understanding is to pass the voice lab we have to score not only 80% in
total but also must score 80% in each individual section. Say for example if
the lab consist of 10 sections and my score is 75% in a particular section
but my overall average score is 90% that would still be a fail??

 

Someone told me recently above is not true and we only need to score 80%
overall...can anyone please confirm if you know for sure..

 

thanks

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

[Mike Thompson]

Doubt it.  he's in a shack in the hills of India peddling his cheat sheets.
That's where a few of those places are based (there or Pakistan).

 

For those of you pushing that sh#&, please do it somewhere else.  We know
it's out there, it that's how we wanted to pass, we'll call you.  if we
don't, take the f'ing hint and just go away.

 

Like dealing with a telemarketer, except we can't just leave the phone on
the desk and walk away.

 

From: Thomas Koch [mailto:koch1...@comcast.net] 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 9:24 PM
To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'voice master'; j...@cia.net; groupst...@ipexpert.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

 

I'm with Mike.I hope he's in the Chicago market..

 

Thomas J Koch
Owner/Consultant 
Digitones, LLC
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail: digito...@comcast.net

  _  

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mike Thompson
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:02 PM
To: 'voice master'; j...@cia.net; groupst...@ipexpert.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

 

Wayne.can you just tell us where this guy comes from and we'll go shut him
up ourselves?

 

From: voice master [mailto:voicemaster2...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:26 PM
To: j...@cia.net; groupst...@ipexpert.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

 


 Hi,
 
 I am not getting money out here to tell you the lies or i am not here to
force someone.
 
All the active member understand how difficult is 2 pass the Voice lab
 
They really required hard work on real lab so that they can pass easily its
no point i think to waste 3 years on the same. Whatever i am not here to
explain
 
2 learn a technology is different to pass the lab is different, To pass the
lab you required real labs otherwise no one can pass and if someone says
they passed the lab without real labs or without discussing breaking NDA
(Cisco) with study partner that means that he is joking and he is not a true
friend.
 
If you start CCIE and makes study partner whenever u attempt u share the lab
with the partner. Ah ha (what it means)
 
Boss if there is no real lab no one can pass i have taken cert but there
were just 10% in the real lab stupid fakers i failed in ver 2 and now i got
something really special heads off 2 ccie voice labs . c o m what a real lab
they have built wow really enjoyed.
 
Yestarday i met 5 CCIE guy (TaXXn) and found the same (ah ha). Can u believe
a guy can be 5 CCIE in just 35 years + CCIE voice not be able to configure
Extension mobility  
 
Without dumps people will not even pass CCVP exam how they will clear CCIE
is all policy.
 
Whoever archieved is archieve thats what i think! :)
 
But thats fine. Now CCIE WIRELESS Guys i am comming.
 
Thks

  _  

Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:27:38 -0400
From: j...@cia.net
To: groupst...@ipexpert.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Wayne Lawson 
wrote:

He's being yanked. It's incredible - does this idiot really think the list
believes him?!  Pretty annoying...


I have to commend him.  I just want to pass once and he seems to pass every
other week.


 

 

  _  

Get easy photo sharing with Windows LiveT Photos. Drag n
<http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/photos.aspx> ' drop

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

[Mike Thompson]

Wayne.can you just tell us where this guy comes from and we'll go shut him
up ourselves?

 

From: voice master [mailto:voicemaster2...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:26 PM
To: j...@cia.net; groupst...@ipexpert.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

 


 Hi,
 
 I am not getting money out here to tell you the lies or i am not here to
force someone.
 
All the active member understand how difficult is 2 pass the Voice lab
 
They really required hard work on real lab so that they can pass easily its
no point i think to waste 3 years on the same. Whatever i am not here to
explain
 
2 learn a technology is different to pass the lab is different, To pass the
lab you required real labs otherwise no one can pass and if someone says
they passed the lab without real labs or without discussing breaking NDA
(Cisco) with study partner that means that he is joking and he is not a true
friend.
 
If you start CCIE and makes study partner whenever u attempt u share the lab
with the partner. Ah ha (what it means)
 
Boss if there is no real lab no one can pass i have taken cert but there
were just 10% in the real lab stupid fakers i failed in ver 2 and now i got
something really special heads off 2 ccie voice labs . c o m what a real lab
they have built wow really enjoyed.
 
Yestarday i met 5 CCIE guy (TaXXn) and found the same (ah ha). Can u believe
a guy can be 5 CCIE in just 35 years + CCIE voice not be able to configure
Extension mobility  
 
Without dumps people will not even pass CCVP exam how they will clear CCIE
is all policy.
 
Whoever archieved is archieve thats what i think! :)
 
But thats fine. Now CCIE WIRELESS Guys i am comming.
 
Thks

  _  

Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:27:38 -0400
From: j...@cia.net
To: groupst...@ipexpert.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed



On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Wayne Lawson 
wrote:

He's being yanked. It's incredible - does this idiot really think the list
believes him?!  Pretty annoying...


I have to commend him.  I just want to pass once and he seems to pass every
other week.


 

 

  _  

Get easy photo sharing with Windows LiveT Photos. Drag n
 ' drop

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

[Mike Thompson]

And the douche bags strike again.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of voice master
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:53 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

 

Hi,
 
Thanks to everyone who has helped me to archieve the same.
 
I am so so so happy to get this ID, struggled from last 1 year.
 
Made 2 attempts on ver 2 but unsuccessful.
 
I have practise on proctorlabs.com, NLI workbook to learn the technology
which i do not know.
 
And at last the masters of voice ccie-voice-labs(dot)com they are really the
best. 
Heads off 2 them labs was same. 
 
I was trying to workout more on GK, SIP but after seeing thier lab there was
nothing much but yes call routing was difficult but i have done some
practise so thats fine.
 
It was a good experience. Now i will run behind CCIE wireless.
 
Thks once again to everyone.
 
THks 

  _  

MSN Battles We pitch one stalwart against the other and give you the power.
Who will you vote for? Share   photos while you
chat with Windows Live Messenger.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEHO-- Using globalised route pattern-Volume2 lab4

[Mike Thompson]

You have a separate TEHO translation pattern for your globalization,
correct?  You shouldn't need to modify your route patterns to account for
TEHO, it should be addressed via the XLation Pattern.



-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Kumar, Narinder
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:20 PM
To: vineet sanghi; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEHO-- Using globalised route
pattern-Volume2 lab4

I try to simulate this and yes you are correct on the BR2 phone when the
calls goes out from HQ GW instead of showing the full E.164 it shows only 7
D on the BR2 phone.
This is not correct from a end user experience.

I tried couple of thing but couldn't get it correct when using the
Globalised/localised dial plan.

Anyone else got the same issue ?

In real life we can educate the end user about this behaviour but is this
correct from a Lab point of view ?

Thanks
Narinder

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of vineet sanghi
Sent: Saturday, 19 September 2009 10:57 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEHO-- Using globalised route pattern-Volume2
lab4

When we use globalised & localised dial plan for TEHO the end user phone is
showing 7D no instead of full dialed international number.eg

when BR2 user( 3001) dials 90012123942123 the call goes via HQ gateway(TEHO)
dialed no on BR2 user( 3001) shows 7D(3942123) instead of 90012123942123
because of Gateway called party transformation.

How can i achieve this by  globalised & localised dial plan?

Alternatively I can use separate Route Pattern for TEHO.

Thanks
Vineet



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com


CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message
is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not
an authorised recipient of this message please contact UXC Getronics
Australia immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from
your computer.  Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or
part thereof, is strictly prohibited.
DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions
expressed in this email are those of the sender and not UXC Getronics
Australia.  While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses,
UXC Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments
are free of viruses or any other defects or errors.  It is the duty of the
recipient to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this
email before loading onto any computer system.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Local Route List question...

[Mike Thompson]

One thing to remember is that with Extension Mobility, it's really the LINE
that you take over.  The device (and associated device CSS, device pool (a
la local route group) ) is still the same device it was when you sat in
front of it.  

 

That being said, the device specific settings are the same whether you use
EM or not:

1)  Local route group dictating your RL/RG for phone calls

2)  911 calls, because they use the Device CSS

3)  Device transformation patterns

4)  Etc.

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:02 PM
To: jonv...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Local Route List question...

 

Oh one last add on,

 

I am using Line Device approach now, where I do my restrictions on the Line
and my patterns to the gateway in the Device partitions.  

 

I guess I am confused on how to handle the device partition with Mobility
and LRG.. with Extension Mobility ontop of all that.  

 

Alex

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Alex Hannah  wrote:

Jonathan,

 

Thanks for your answer...  I had one follow up question. 

 

With regards to Extension Mobility -  If a user in San Jose logs into an IP
Phone in NYC, then Device Mobility kicks in and as you stated... "sees that
the phone is in NYC and applies the NYC device pool to the LRG..", how /
what mechanism do you use to ensure the user calls out to the PSTN the same
way they did in San Jose... ie if they pick up a phone, they will dial
9.1212XXX instead of just 9.212XXX, because to them that call they
make to NYC is still LD since they are used to dialing it that way in San
Jose... I guess does that question make sense?  Would you just handle it via
the Route Patterns if it was MGCP or Dial Peers if it was H.323?  ie you
would add a pattern matching 91.212XXX and discard predot?  If that's
the case then you would need to handle their local calling as well since
they would be used to dialing local calls in San Jose using 407XX and
you would prepend 1 right?  

 

How do you handle the dial plan for a user using extension mobility when
they log into a phone in a different NPA/NXX area then where their home
phone is located?  And the phone they log into will be routing out a
differnet gateway then they usually go out since it's LRG and Device
Mobility enabled?  

 

Thanks again,

 

Alex

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Robert McGhee 
wrote:

Unless they're physically bringing the phone from SD to NY then I don't
think they would need device mobility, the calls would just use the device
pool/local route group assigned to that NY phone


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 7:33 PM
To: Alex Hannah
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Local Route List question...

1. Device Mobility kicks in, sees that the phone is in NYC and applies
the NYC device pool to the LRG...

2. You would create a new RL called 212RL, with NYC as first RG, and
then SLRG as second.


Jonathan

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Alex Hannah  wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I am trying to wrap my head around the local route list concept.  I know
it
> in effect decouples the route list from the route group.  I have
> successfully configured it in my lab here at home with two sites (
simulated
> NYC and San Jose )...  And I can run debug isdn q931 and DNA and see the
> call going out the proper gateway according to the calling parties device
> pool.
>
> Here is my question(s).
>
> 1.  How does a Local Route list play with Extension Mobility?  In this
> scenerio, a user from San Jose logs into a phone in NYC, according to the
> device pool the call will route out the NYC gateway.  However, the Ext
> Mobility Profile and number is still based in San Jose...  would I need to
> use Device Mobility in conjunction with this in order to correct any
issues?
>
> 2.  Tail end hop off ( TEHO ) / Toll Bypass - if I wanted to configure
TEHO
> in this scenerio ( ie all calls from San Jose to NYC would route out NYC
> gateway ), In the Partition containing the route patterns used by Local
> Route Group would I simply create a RP for toll bypass ( 1212XXX) and
> point it to an independant RL > RG > NYC gateway?
>
> Is there any other "gotcha's" I should be concerned with concerning Local
> route group?  We are considering implimenting it in production but I'm
> trying to limit anything from catching me off guard here.
>
> Thanks a million,
>
> Alex
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com  
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, plea

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AMD Duals and Quads W/VMWARE

[Mike Thompson]

INITIAL install of the apps will fail on AMD.  You can install on an Intel
box and then copy it over (turn it into an appliance and then import also
works).

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jim Van Kirk
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 10:23 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AMD Duals and Quads W/VMWARE

 

 

 

I know the subject of VMWARE on servers has been beat into the ground, but I
just wanted to see if anyone has experienced any problems with AMD
processors with VMWARE or any of the Cisco apps. I'm looking to purchase a
new server and wanted to be sure before I took the plunge.

 

As always, thanks in advance.

 

Cheers!

Jim

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about building CUCM/UC/UCCX/CUPS on VMware

[Mike Thompson]

For the amount of bandwidth we'd be pushing out of the servers, there's no
reason to have a dedicated NIC.

 

Two important notes on this:

 

1)  If all of your servers are on the same physical VMWare host.  All
inter-server traffic occurs via RAM within the host.nothing hits the NIC.

2)  The only advantage I can think of for having a separate NIC is to
'seclude' your Windows2003 server from the UCM network (unless you can VLAN
the NIC on the server).

 

My 2 cents, but HTH

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie8340tx
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 2:29 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about building CUCM/UC/UCCX/CUPS on
VMware

 

Folks:

 

I finally have a windows 2003 server built and getting ready to load vmware.
I have read instructions from Mark Hollaway's website and find it very
helpful. Thanks Mark.

 

Question now. I am new to vmware and I understand that in order to setup
each of the above servers, one needs  avirtual switch configured on VMWARE
server either on the same host OS NIC nic or a dedicated second NIC

 

So is that the best way to go about this ?

 

Appreciate any ideas on best way to go about this.

 

Thanks,Padhu

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two

[Mike Thompson]

Jason...YOU my friend, need help :)

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:42 PM
To: Brian Valentine; Jonathan Charles
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two

25309, hmm... 2+5+3+0+9 = 19, 1+9 = 10, 10 = 2 in binary. Since this was
your second attempt I think it all adds up...

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brian Valentine
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:34 AM
To: Jonathan Charles
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two

CONGRATS!   25309 is a round enough number, huh?!  I bet you can live with
that!

That's quite the achievement!  And to think, you left 30 minutes and a
few points on the table and still passed.  You are my hero!

Best wishes in all your future endeavors.


On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> OK, I got 25309
>
> Weird, I passed who knew?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:13 AM, kapil atrish wrote:
>> I cracked mine on 3rd go in V2. Be consistent...good luck
>>
>> --- On Wed, 9/2/09, Ravindra Lakpriya  wrote:
>>
>> From: Ravindra Lakpriya 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two
>> To: "Tanner Ezell" 
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 11:00 AM
>>
>> Let's hope for the best man. U ll nail it. All the best dude.
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 2, 2009, Tanner Ezell 
>> wrote:
>>> Good luck Jonathan, look forward to hearing the results!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Jonathan Charles 
>>> wrote:
>>> OK, took v3 again in RTP today... finished 30 minutes early...
>>>
>>> Well, not really... what happened was that I was doing some last
>>> minute tweaking (just retesting stuff, cleaning up some config) and
>>> some key huge point items stopped working... I undid what I did to
>>> break stuff, got up and walked away... yes, there was 30 minutes on
>>> the table, but it could have been the death of me...
>>>
>>> Anyway, waiting on results I would like to claim optimism, as I
>>> studied the crap out of my shortcomings last time, but I have done
>>> this before where I walked out of a lab pretty confident to see zero
>>> on sections I thought I aced... to be honest, I am like 85% sure I
>>> failed again.
>>>
>>> As they all say, the test is fair, nothing out of left field, some
>>> surprises on what was on there and what wasn't... there are some
>>> sleazy traps, but if you have a clue, you will work around em pretty
>>> quick...
>>>
>>>
>>> Took the first one in SJ, took this one in RTP... so, I can compare...
>>>
>>> In SJ, the phones are nailed to the walls in the cubicle... in RTP,
>>> they are on the desk (so you can flip em over and look at em...)...
>>> not sure which I prefer... I kinda like throwing them at the wall...
>>> But then again, in SJ, Ben Ng is sitting 4 feet from you, so, no
>>> intimidation there...
>>>
>>> I saw the remnants of the old v2 labs sitting in RTP, still had phones
>>> and fax machines... looked abandoned...
>>>
>>> Everything else I could say would be NDA... so, guys, do what you
>>> always do, look for the flurry of questions on 'how do I" in this
>>> group or as veiled customer issues on Puck
>>>
>>> As a joke, here are the four questions I would ask:
>>>
>>> Why on this day are we limited on how we can dial? When on all other
>>> days we can dial however we want?
>>> Why on this day must we use frame-relay, when on all other days, all
>>> of our customers have MPLS?
>>> Why on this day are we running unpatched, basically beta-versions of
>>> CUCM, CUPS, CUCCX, when on other days we can install patches to get
>>> around bugs?
>>> Why on this day do I have to fly all the way to Raleigh and start the
>>> test at 7:15AM, when the guys who go to San Jose get to sleep in and
>>> take their test at 9:00?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>> If you are Jewish, those are funny.
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ravindra Lakpriya
>> +94 773 532 094
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCX Scripting

[Mike Thompson]

Buried in the crypts of CCO, there is a nice set of docs for scripting.

Cisco unified contact center express getting started with scripts is  
the first one. Each is bout 10mb so no emailing


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:34 PM, ABIOLA ADEFILA   
wrote:

> Hello,
> does anyone have an idea of a guide that will help understand how to  
> write a script apart from the documents from CCO
>
> thanks in advance
>
> Rgd
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] "Desk phone control" option missing from CUPS application menu

[Mike Thompson]

Verify user - device association at all the appropriate locations

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Aug 8, 2009, at 2:52 AM, jeremy co  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> could be very stupid question since I have no exp in CUPS.
>
> anybody can explain to me why this option is missing ?
>
> "Desk phone control" option missing from CUPS application menu
>
> How could I bring it over?
>
>
>
> Jeremy
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCXX 7.0 high Availability ?

[Mike Thompson]

No failover UCCX server from what I understand. The failover of UCCX  
means that it is integrated to pin and sub.

AD / DNS is testable, but won't be done for month (please correct if  
anyone knows anything different).

Some features for CUPS are AD dependant, but many are not.

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Aug 8, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Azeem ahamed  wrote:

> Hi there
>
> I am not sure whether this was discussed before in the forum but  
> still wanted a confirmation for the below as i am building a home  
> lab for voice
>
> 1. Is UCCX 7.0 to be configured for High Availability? In that case  
> do we require to instance of UCCX 7.0 running ?
> 2. As per my understanding there is NO DNS as well AD for the ver  
> 3.0, then how will we deploy CUPS?
> 3. If there is a windows based DNS as well as AD will it be on one  
> of the UC aplliance or a seperate server ?
>
> Thanks
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab exam points

[Mike Thompson]

It is the same for the voice lab. OEQ is 21 points and the remaining Q  
are worth 79 total. Same amount of work but less 3 and 4 point  
questions.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Aug 7, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Brett  wrote:

At least with R&S, the OEQs are 21 pts and the remainder of the lab  
had 79 pts allocated across the various tasks.  You require an  
overall score of 80% to pass the exam.  Note the OEQs mark must be  
3/4 questions answered correctly or more in order to get the 21 pts  
from that section.  You can 'pass' the lab portion but if you fail  
the OEQs, you will fail the lab as a whole. (Been there, done  
that).  So you'll need at least 59 pts from the lab (75%) and a pass  
on the OEQs to get your number.  Note that your score report only  
lists percentages per section, and not actual points scored.


Rereads are not available if you do not pass the OEQ section,  
regardless of your lab score, and the 'company line' is that you  
cannot request a reread of the OEQs alone if you failed that  
section, though they will be reevaluated should you be eligible for  
a reread.


HTH,
Brett

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Mick Vaites   
wrote:

Hi All,

Not sure if this has been covered.

With the addition of the OEQs do the points associate with the lab  
tasks add up to 79 or 100?


I vaguely remember seeing something about only needing 58% and not  
80% on the main lab.


Again apologies if this has already been asked – please put it down  
to sleep deprivation ;-)


Best regards

Mick

E: m...@pobox.net.uk

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMWare on Linux vs. Windows Vista x64

[Mike Thompson]

Anyone else think Mr Ciarfello is just bragging about his toys?? :)

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:32 PM
To: Mark Holloway; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMWare on Linux vs. Windows Vista x64

Don't know.  But I can offer Google.  Search for performance tests or
something.
Or put Windows as a guest on each and run a benchmarking program.
What type of CPU and how much RAM do you have?

My I7 processor with 12 GB RAM probably won't notice much performance
difference between your three host environments.  The CPU meter barely is
breathing heavy when 2 CCM's, UC, IPCC, and CUP is running.

Would probably go for ease of administration, manageability, etc for fast
CPU's rather than squeezing the orange a little harder.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
[...@markholloway.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:37 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMWare on Linux vs. Windows Vista x64

Is there a significant performance difference between VMWare
Workstation 6.x on Linux (CentOS? Mint?) compared to Workstation on
Vista x64?  I know ESXi provides a speed bump over Vista, but I have
other VM's I am running with Workstation and prefer not to derail.

Thanks,
Mark



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 and 2 Initial configs.

[Mike Thompson]

I believe that's all we'll get.  The rest all feed off of the volume 5
config (building off each other).

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:52 PM
To: Bill Hatcher; ccievoice
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 and 2 Initial configs.

 

I get the same thing.  

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Bill Hatcher
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:34 AM
To: ccievoice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 and 2 Initial configs.

 

I seem to only have up to lab 5b in my configs.  Have they released a more
updated set of configs, and my account just has not been updated?

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 and Videos?

[Mike Thompson]

Anyone else seeing anything in their 'my hard drive' area?  I assume it will
either be there or something they ship, but I don't see any update on the
blog either.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:35 AM
To: Mike Down
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 and Videos?

Do we need to do anything, or does it ship automatically?

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Mike Down wrote:
> The VOD should be shipping today/Monday at the latest.  Existing customers
> are entitled to the updates.  I would suggest you following our blog at
> http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com for information regarding product releases,
> special promotions and techtorials.
>
>
> Best wishes,
> Mike Down
>
> Training Advisor - Proctor Labs, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 x 206
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: md...@proctorlabs.com
> Skype: mikedownipexpert
> --
> Follow me on Twitter!
> Check out My Blog!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:01 AM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 41, Issue 224
>
> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>        ccie_vo...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Volume 2 and Videos? (Jonathan Charles)
>   2. Re: Volume 2 and Videos? (Jason Granat)
>   3. Re: Volume 2 and Videos? (smael)
>   4. Re: IPBlue 7962 support. (ccieid1ot)
>   5. Re: Volume 2 and Videos? (ctpresident)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:34:01 -0500
> From: Jonathan Charles 
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 and Videos?
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Message-ID:
>        <5d093f9a0907310734i7812e07dv17c345a94f077...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Were they supposed to be out today?
>
> Also, if those of us with pre-existing BLS are not entitled to the new
> material, how do we go about getting the upgrade?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:39:42 -0700
> From: Jason Granat 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 and Videos?
> To: Jonathan Charles ,
>        "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
> 
> Message-ID:
>        <4b7c6fa1c76f2e45b236701f379ad4ad0165165de...@mx2.lab.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I hope those of us that purchased the old BLS are entitled to the new
> material until we pass:
>
>
>
> http://www.ipexpert.com/Guarantee
>
>
>
> This is one of the big reasons I use IPExpert (that and of course they
rock
> :))
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Charles
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 7:34 AM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 and Videos?
>
>
>
> Were they supposed to be out today?
>
>
>
> Also, if those of us with pre-existing BLS are not entitled to the new
>
> material, how do we go about getting the upgrade?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> ___
>
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> 
>
>
> http://slash128.com
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090731/a85c44b
> b/attachment-0001.htm
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:45:11 -0400
> From: smael 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 and Videos?
> To: Jason Granat , Jonathan Charles
>        ,    "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
>        
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I purchased the latest BLS for V3 lab by the June 30th, 2009 deadline, but
> it came loaded with the older version.
>
> It should be a supported upgrade
>
>
>
>
> On 7/31/09 10:39 AM, "Jason Granat"  wrote:
>
>> I hope those of us that purchased the old BLS are entitled to the new
> material
>> until we pass:
>>
>> http://www.ipexpert.com/Guarantee
>>
>> This is one of the big reasons I use IPExpert (that and of course they
> rock J)
>>
>>
>> -

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] esx 4 settings for voice servers

[Mike Thompson]

Make sure that you aren't running an AMD processor.  UCM (and I assume
others) are assuming Intel since both the HP and Intel servers use them.  I
built my machines on another machine and exported them to the AMD box, they
run fine, just won't install.

MT

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Scott ODonnell
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 11:15 AM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] esx 4 settings for voice servers

 

if anyone is using esx or esxi for hosting, could you please reply with the
underlying virtual machine settings? (nic,hd,etc)

 

I cant get a successful install on esx

it runs almost to the end but errors out indicating ine if the install
scripts timed out

 

thanks

scott

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Where to start

[Mike Thompson]

Since Layer 2 can either be a 3750 or a ESW, you need at least 1 or 2 HQ
phones off of the 3750.  To simulate the ESW, you can get a 3550 for the
basic fact that the port REQUIRES trunking in an ESW and on the 3550.  I
didn't get into the QoS differences.  If you can swing 2 or 3 drops off the
3750 (1 or 2 for phones and the other for trunk), then that should be
sufficient.

 

My 2 pennies.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 10:55 AM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Where to start

 


I've been putting off the lab for various reasons but finally bought the V1
workbooks last week.  Now that I have the first volume at my finger tips I'm
curious how those of you who have been here for awhile started your
studying?  

I've printed out the entire SRND just because I do better reading from paper
at times.   I'm curious, when its said to "know the SRND" to what extent are
we talking about?

On a technical note, I have a 3750 switch that is about 100 cable feet away
from where I'm going to have my phones and limited runs of ethernet.  For
those of you who have progressed through the V3 labs should I focus on the
phones being plugged directly into the 3750 or can I use a 3560 at the desk
trunked off the 3750?   I'm concerned there may be 3750 specific QoS or
port-level trusting that expects the phones to be direct connected to a 3750
vs a 3560 and I'd rather not read ahead in the labs to answer this question
if someone here can.
(My lab is racked in a data center for power/cooling)

Any tips from those of you on how you wished you had started I'm open to
hearing.  I've probably been lurking here for over a year, reading the blogs
of many of you here since the last few phases of the V2 exams.

I have a history of working with 4.1.3 and 6.1.2 with both MGCP and H.323
endpoints, some UCCx scripting, Unity, etc for the past 3-4 years.  Limited
exposure to CME/CUE.

Thanks,

-Jeff Garvas










___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Phone

[Mike Thompson]

You still get prompted for the password, or do you not start the upgrade
after the reboot?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Bill Hatcher
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:32 AM
To: c george; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Phone

 

Yeah, you would think that should work, but it does not.  I looked on
google, and it seems that a lot of people have this issue too.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:23 PM, c george  wrote:

try a factory reset

please verify this procedure on cisco web site etc

power off the phone and while holding down the pound sign plugg the phone
back in and when the lights on the buuton pad all blink then press
123456789*0#

the phone should then display upgrading

Respectfully Charles George




  _  

Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:02:46 +0300
From: wchatc...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Phone 

 

I have a 7960 that was ordered form e-bay with a MGCP phone load on it.  It
is locked with a password, and there was not one supplied with it.  Does
anyone know the default password, and how to do a password recovery on this
device?

 

Bill Hatcher

 

  _  

Windows LiveT HotmailR: Celebrate the moment with your favorite sports pics.
Check it out.
 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Error in study guide/proctor guide (5.18 - 5.19) or bug in 7.0.1 for Mobility??

[Mike Thompson]

To rule out a few of those things I called from BR1 phones and then from HQ
phones.

 

It only happened from the BR1 phones (it also worked fine from PSTN phones).

 

Doing more research, it actually looks like it's being caused by the calling
number transformation pattern from a previous step even though I have the
box unchecked on the phones as that dictates to use Device Pool Calling
party Transformation.

 

The Transformation Pattern is set to use Calling Party's external number
mask for 1XXX calls.

 

 

From: c george [mailto:cisco...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:46 PM
To: mthompson...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Error in study guide/proctor guide (5.18 -
5.19) or bug in 7.0.1 for Mobility??

 

if ypou are following the guide did you do the application rules setup.

I had the same issue doing it on my own. followed the guide and did
application rules, restarted mobility service and all is well


Respectfully Charles George




  _  

From: mthompson...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:33:34 -0400
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Error in study guide/proctor guide (5.18 - 5.19)
or bug in 7.0.1 for Mobility??

In testing mobility questions, when I call from BR1 Phone 2 (as is
recommended by the proctor guide) the call does not forward out to my remote
destination.  When I call from 5001 (or external numbers) it works fine.  So
I started thinking.

 

- The numbering scheme for BR1 is obviously 6178631XXX.  

- The pattern 617XXX is in our block scheme for the access list on the
RDP.

- The call is presented to HQ Phone 2 as 1002 when I call from BR1 Phone 2.
HOWEVER, call isn't forwarded out to the Remote Destination.

 

Hmmm, I wonder.  I removed the external number mask from the DN 1002, lo and
behold  *** call extends to the RD ***.  SO, question is.is this a bug or an
error in the proctor guide / study guide?

 

I'm about to upgrade to 7.0.1 SU1a to see if the issue persists. 

 

 

 

  _  

Windows LiveT HotmailR: Search, add, and share the web's latest sports
videos. Check it out.
 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Error in study guide/proctor guide (5.18 - 5.19) or bug in 7.0.1 for Mobility??

[Mike Thompson]

In testing mobility questions, when I call from BR1 Phone 2 (as is
recommended by the proctor guide) the call does not forward out to my remote
destination.  When I call from 5001 (or external numbers) it works fine.  So
I started thinking.

 

- The numbering scheme for BR1 is obviously 6178631XXX.  

- The pattern 617XXX is in our block scheme for the access list on the
RDP.

- The call is presented to HQ Phone 2 as 1002 when I call from BR1 Phone 2.
HOWEVER, call isn't forwarded out to the Remote Destination.

 

Hmmm, I wonder.  I removed the external number mask from the DN 1002, lo and
behold  *** call extends to the RD ***.  SO, question is.is this a bug or an
error in the proctor guide / study guide?

 

I'm about to upgrade to 7.0.1 SU1a to see if the issue persists. 

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Initial Configs for lab 7+

[Mike Thompson]

My understanding was that beyond that everything built off the previous lab.
That may have just been for UCM though.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Larry Hadrava
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:12 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Initial Configs for lab 7+

 

Hello All:

I'm checking on this for you.


Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP 
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com



On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Aamir Panjwani
 wrote:

I would like to know about that too. I was told 2 weeks ago that initial
config for all volume 1 labs will be available in 1-2 days!

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steve Sarrick
Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2009 9:36 AM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Initial Configs for lab 7+

 

I don't see a load initial config for labs above 6.  I would assume we use
lab 6 for lab 6 and all labs after, but it didn't jump out and bite me yet
in the documentation.  Would I be correct, or please set me straight!
Thanks as always.

 

Steve Sarrick


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com  

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice command

[Mike Thompson]

Because it's VERY possible that the lab may tell you that you're not allowed
to use it.  if it does, then you REALLY need to know the 'long way' to do
the MGCP configuration.


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 2:21 PM
To: Peter Slow
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice command

OK, I have tested this to a reasonably great extent.

It works fine.

The command, isdn busy b_channel 7-24 works perfectly... thank you!

I did not know this existed, and considering it was released in 12.1,
I feel kinda dumb...

So, the question is, why has everyone (including IPExpert, et al) been
telling us for years not to use ccm config




Jonathan



On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Will that command stay there when ccm config is applied?
>
>
> J
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Peter Slow wrote:
>> John,
>>   Saying "no, you're wrong and you'll get 0 points." isn't going to
>> get you very far. If you want to paste me some show commands showing
>> something in an informational, constructive and helpful way, I'd
>> welcome whatever you have to teach me. I promise to do the same for
>> you ;)
>>   My thoughts were that a status enquiry should be sent for each
>> channel at reinitializtion of the D channel, but perhaps that's not
>> the case or will depend on configuration. Even with that the case,
>> there is still a command to get around the issue.
>>
>> verfakizon#sh run | inc controller|slots
>> controller T1 2/0
>>  pri-group timeslots 1-24
>> verfakizon#conf t
>> Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
>> verfakizon(config)#int serial 2/0:23
>> verfakizon(config-if)#isdn busy b_channel 9-24
>>  ISDN:Se2/0:23 Warning: D-channel specified in channel range
>> verfakizon(config-if)#^Z
>> verfakizon#show isdn serv se 2/0:23
>> 1w1d: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by humboldt on vty0
>> (10.18.63.131)
>> PRI Channel Statistics:
>> ISDN Se2/0:23, Channel [1-24]
>>  Configured Isdn Interface (dsl) 0
>>   Channel State (0=Idle 1=Proposed 2=Busy 3=Reserved 4=Restart
5=Maint_Pend)
>>    Channel :  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4
>>    State   :  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
>>   Service State (0=Inservice 1=Maint 2=Outofservice 8=MaintPend
9=OOSPend)
>>    Channel :  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4
>>    State   :  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
>> verfakizon#
>>
>> Throw that command under the serial int and your calls should avoid
>> the busied out channels once you fall back to h.323
>>
>> -Pete
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Jonathan Charles
wrote:
>>> And then you will go into SRST, and your calls will fail, and you will
>>> get 0 for high availability.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Peter Slow wrote:
 Tim,
  I don't think you shodl end up in this situation. If you've got that
 service parameter configured in CUCM it should match the timeslot
 configuration under the controller in IOS - additionally, each channel
 needs to be brought in service at initialization - even with 24/30
 channels configured on the IOS side the network side should tell you
 that those channels are out of service and the ISDN stack should know
 not to try to send a call out of them.

 -Pete

 On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
> Aha! yep thats the one... had been a while since I'd touched a
fractional
> PRI.
>
> Under MGCP with serv parameter they wont fail.. but that is dead on..
you
> are stuffed when you flick over to SRST and fallback to H323.. then
you get
> the full 30 channels as the GW and calls trying to use channels that
arent
> active.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Jonathan Charles 
wrote:
>>
>> I didn't say the PRI wouldn't come up. I am saying that your calls
will
>> fail.
>>
>> Especially on BR2 with SRST...
>>
>>
>> J
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Tim Smith
wrote:
>> > I dont think that is correct. Pretty sure the PRI will come up
>> > regardless.
>> >
>> > The issue with fractional PRI and ccm-manager config is that it
>> > provisions
>> > all 30 channels automatically, and you cant tell it to provision
any
>> > less.
>> > This causes issues on channel selection for in / outbound calls -
i.e.
>> > using
>> > channels that dont exist.
>> >
>> > You can use the B-Channel maintenance service parameter to work
around
>> > this
>> > issue for small deployments. (only works for 5 gateways) but it
lets you
>> > provision all 30 and then busy out the channels you are not using.
>> >
>> >
http://supportwiki.cisco.c

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A style versus function

[Mike Thompson]

I don't know that it would matter.  The originating ANI (the PSTN phone) is
what is showing on 1002 when it rings.so caller ID is preserved.  It will
show a redirecting value of 3000, but I can't think of an issue (barring
specific translation rule manipulation) that would make that a show stopper.
I don't know what 1002 being forwarded to VM has to do with the function
thru the BR2 router.  Can you be more specific as to what you feel might be
lost in that event?

 

From: vineet sanghi [mailto:vineet_san...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 10:16 AM
To: Michael Thompson
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A style versus function

 

The one of the caveats for the second case, if 1002 is forwarded to VM . 

 

  _  

From: Michael Thompson 
To: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam 
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 10:38:40 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A style versus function

looking for opinions on what I could be missing on 2 facets of the tasks.

 

There are 2 things that I'm looking at that are style points that I want to
get opinions on.

 

for the calls out via the E1-PRI from the HQ/BR1 sites.  creating the dial
peer fo the outbound call, is there an advantage / necessity to creating it
with a 901134T destination pattern versus simply making it 901134?  since
we're obviously dealing with the T.302 timer on the UCM side, we won't be
adding more digits once the call is submitted to the h.323 gateway (BR2
router).  adding a T on the end of the destination patter adds ambiguity and
seems sloppy.  

 

the other is regarding inbound calls to the CME router.  I know that
creating the translation rule and forwarding the call as it comes in is
sexier, but the same can be accomplished by creating an ephone-dn w/ number
3000 and CFwdAll to 1002.  that is very likely over simplifying it, but I
can't find anything in this question that would predicate us from doing so.
That being said, I know that the exercise of this is to gain comfort with
more complex configuration and structure.  BUT, that complexity would cost
you a little valuable time.

 

what caveats am I missing that would make the CFwdAll solution fail?

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTP Environment.

[Mike Thompson]

Take ear plugs!!

 

You’ll likely have fans from equipment in the racks 10 to 20 feet away (if
similar to San Jose).  More importantly, if you’re taking the lab with other
voice candidates, you don’t want to have their ringing phones mess with your
mojo.

 

Some people will fart around ½ hr to 1 hr in and start ringing phones to
test (and you KNOW they aren’t close to being completed with anything yet).
If you hear that, it may subconsciously get you thinking that you’re behind
and you’ll start making mistakes.

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steve Sarrick
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 3:57 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTP Environment.

 

Quick question.  What is the RTP lab environment like.  Are you in your own
relatively quiet place?  I’m just trying to picture if I’m going to be in my
own little world or in a room with other voice IE candidates separated by a
cubicle wall or something.  

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip 7961 upgrade failure

[Mike Thompson]

I basically did a tftp debug in cme to watch what files it needed to  
load the phone. It's essentially the .sbn and .loads files (I uses  
term61.default as my load reference).  I did have to add tftp-server  
statements for the jar*.sbn, the dsp*.sbn, the cvm*.sbn, the cnu*.sbn,  
and the apps*.sbn files.


HTH.
MY

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jul 15, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Michael Ciarfello  
 wrote:


No joke, no hint.  Maybe someone else can chime in here.  I don’t ne 
ed any of these


tftp-server syncinfo.xml url flash:/syncinfo.xml
tftp-server SIPDefault.cnf url flash:/SIPDefault.cnf
tftp-server softkeyDefault_kpml.xml url flash:/softkeyDefault_kpml.xml
tftp-server softkeyDefault.xml url flash:/softkeyDefault.xml
tftp-server softkey1_kpml.xml url flash:/softkey1_kpml.xml
tftp-server softkey1.xml url flash:/softkey1.xml
tftp-server cme_dialplan_1.xml url flash:/cme_dialplan_1.xml
tftp-server SIP000BBEF9E5A6.cnf url flash:/SIP000BBEF9E5A6.cnf
tftp-server SEP001818D88251.cnf.xml url flash:/SEP001818D88251.cnf.xml




The only commands I have are phone firmware files:  Everything seems  
to work fine.


tftp-path flash:

tftp-server flash:SCCP70.8-4-2S.loads

tftp-server flash:apps70.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:cnu70.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:cvm70sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:dsp70.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:ds

tftp-server flash:jar70sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:term70.default.loads

tftp-server flash:P00308000500.bin

tftp-server flash:P00308000500.loads

tftp-server flash:P00308000500.sb2

tftp-server flash:P00308000500.sbn

tftp-server flash:cvm70sip.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:jar70sip.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:SIP70.8-4-2S.loads

tftp-server flash:term71.default.loads

tftp-server flash:P003-08-11-00.sbn

tftp-server flash:P003-08-11-00.bin

tftp-server flash:P003-08-11-00.sb2

tftp-server flash:P003-08-11-00.loads

tftp-server flash:apps41.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:cnu41.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:cvm41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:dsp41.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:jar41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:SCCP41.8-4-2S.loads

tftp-server flash:term41.default.loads

tftp-server flash:term61.default.loads

tftp-server flash:cvm41sip.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:jar41sip.8-4-1-23.sbn

tftp-server flash:SIP41.8-4-2S.loads

tftp-server flash:/CP7912080003SCCP070409A

tftp-server flash:/CP7912080003SCCP070409A.sbin

tftp-server flash:/apps70.8-3-3ES2.sbn alias apps70.8-3-3ES2.sbn

tftp-server flash:/cnu70.8-3-3ES2.sbn alias cnu70.8-3-3ES2.sbn

tftp-server flash:/cvm70sip.8-3-3ES2.sbn alias cvm70sip.8-3-3ES2.sbn

tftp-server flash:/dsp70.8-3-3ES2.sbn alias dsp70.8-3-3ES2.sbn

tftp-server flash:/jar70sip.8-3-3ES2.sbn alias jar70sip.8-3-3ES2.sbn

tftp-server flash:/SIP70.8-3-3SR2S.loads alias SIP70.8-3-3SR2S.loads

tftp-server flash:/OS79XX.TXT alias OS79XX.TXT

tftp-server flash:/P0S3-08-6-00.loads alias P0S3-08-6-00.loads

tftp-server flash:/P0S3-08-6-00.sb2 alias P0S3-08-6-00.sb2

tftp-server flash:/P003-08-6-00.bin alias P003-08-6-00.bin

tftp-server flash:/P003-08-6-00.sbn alias P003-08-6-00.sbn



From: c george [mailto:cisco...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:46 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip 7961 upgrade failure



thats the joke. You do need them and have to manually add them. when  
you extract the files into flash you must still reference them even  
in cme 7.1 unless there is something I do not know


are you hinting something to me?

Respectfully Charles George


From: mciarfe...@iplogic.com
To: cisco...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:26:44 -0400
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip 7961 upgrade failure

Glad you got it working.  The tftp-server requirement is hidden in  
the CCME Administrator guide somewhere towards the beginning.  The  
WHOLE book will be worth a good read at least a couple times.




Yea, those files are created (the CNF files, etc in, for example,  
flash) , but the tftp-command's are not needed as far as I know or  
automatically added to the configuration.  Where did you get them  
from?  I don't see a requirement for them in the admin guide.




From: c george [cisco...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:30 PM
To: Michael Ciarfello; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip 7961 upgrade failure

that was the issue. I forgot to add the tftp-server files for the  
7961.


although they were in flash and I had the tftp-path flash command  
under voice register I still had to add manually the tftp-server  
flash: command for all files


as far these files below they are created when you do cre prof under  
voice reg global



tftp-server syncinfo.xml url flash:/syncinfo.xml
tftp-server SIPDefault.cnf url flash:/SIPDefault

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP +H323 route groups

[Mike Thompson]

And that's one of the reasons you set the H-323 setup timer to 3 seconds.

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:48 PM
To: Nara Shikamaru
Cc: OSL Group; GRAFL Philipp
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP
+H323 route groups

 

Did you wait enough time for the h323 call to fail before it kicked over to
the MGCP gateway entry?  I remember it taking a while.  I can try it later
tonight.  Also, what do your trace files indicate is happening?

 

From: Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 2:27 PM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: GRAFL Philipp; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP
+H323 route groups

 

The detail for this setting states that it's for ICT calls, so I don't know
if it will work for this particular issue.  I've worked through the issue by
adding voip dial peer pointed at an alternate gateway with lower preferences
that are used in case the pots dial peers fail.  Of course, the side effect
is that I have a ton of dial peers now.  Maybe Vik or Mark have an opinion?

 

It seems to me that this would be a problem for both H323 and SIP gateways.

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael Ciarfello 
wrote:

You bring up an interesting question that would be good to get down solid.
I haven't researched it FULLY yet, but try this as an answer.  I'm sure
someone has a more exacting answer or knows where the answer is.

 

I think because the call could not go out the H323 connection (for whatever
reason), the error returned will be unallocated number and cause us to go to
the route list member.  You should be able to look at a trace file to see
what happens as your H323 call fails and the error that returns.  You should
also see it try the next member in the route list (MGCP this time.)

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 12:56 PM
To: GRAFL Philipp
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP
+H323 route groups

 

Sorry, I have no idea how this flag is related to my original question.  Can
you explain?

 

 


Stop Routing on Unallocated Number Flag: Error! Filename not specified.

This parameter determines routing behavior for intercluster trunk calls to
an unallocated number. An unallocated number represents a dialed directory
number that does not exist in a Cisco cluster. Valid values specify True or
False. When the parameter is set to True and a call that is being routed to
a remote Cisco cluster through a route list is released by a remote Cisco
CallManager because of the unallocated number, a local Cisco CallManager
will stop routing the call to a next device in the route list. When the
parameter is set to False, the local Cisco CallManager will route the call
to the next device. 

 

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:10 AM, GRAFL Philipp 
wrote:

Try in CCM-Service parameter: Stop routing on unallocated number flag =
false.

 

 

 

Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Im Auftrag von Nara
Shikamaru
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 09. Juli 2009 18:08
An: OSL Group
Betreff: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP +H323
route groups

 

I'm working on a situation whereby a route list has two route groups, each
contain end points with different call controls.  Primary is H323, secondary
is MGCP.  I've run into an unfortunate shortcoming that I hope I'm wrong
abount.  In order to get calls routed to the second route group in the list,
it LOOKS like the H323 end point has to be completely inaccessible.  In
other words, it's not enough that the PRI is down; the whole device needs to
be unreachable.  I suspect this is due to the fact that on an H323 gateway
the PRI is not being backhauled to CUCM so the cluster has no way of knowing
that the circuit is down, so it continues to be engaged.  I would LIKE to
set up a situation whereby if the PRI is not functional, the second route
group in the list is used.  Does this mean that I would have to configure
the first gateway as MGCP instead?  



-- 
-Shikamaru






-- 
-Shikamaru




-- 
-Shikamaru

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Date

[Mike Thompson]

So CTPresident, to actually ANSWER your question (ß jokingly nudges Mr.
Ciarfello).  Yes, the system is smart enough.  I had tried to schedule a
date too far out previously and it wouldn’t let me do so.  It wasn’t
specific in the message (i.e. it didn’t tell me that I was scheduling too
far past my written), it merely wouldn’t let me schedule it.


MT

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:00 PM
To: ctpresident; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Date

 

http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/policies/index.html#7

 

Written Exam: Expiration
Candidates must make an initial attempt of the CCIE lab exam within 18
months of passing the CCIE written exam. Candidates who do not pass must
re-attempt the lab exam within 12 months of their last scored attempt in
order for their written exam to remain valid. If a candidate does not pass
the lab exam within three years of passing the written exam, he or she must
retake the written exam before being allowed to attempt the lab exam again.

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ctpresident
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 8:08 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Date

 

Hey gang!

Sorry to ask a non-study related question, but just want to make sure all my
ducks are in a row:

I wrote the written exam on the 9th of May last year, and booked the lab for
the 9th of November this year. That's exactly 18 calendar moths. So it
should be good, right? I haven't tried booking for a later date, so I don't
know if the booking database is clever enough to tell you, you've booked for
a date that's out of the valid range. If it is clever enough, then I should
be good to go, cause it allowed my booking. I'm just afraid it's not,
accepts my booking, but when the time comes, they tell me: "Well sorry, you
should have taken the lab WITHIN the 18 month period".

I'm sure it should be OK, but paranoia is setting in, and I guess, I just
want some reassurance from anyone who has the facts.

Thanks!

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX 7 with vmware..

[Mike Thompson]

No workaround, it is a Microsoft licensing issue. If you are using a  
valid copy of cisco / Microsoft load, make sure it isn't the 2003 load  
that had a bug that acted just the way you are talking about (valid s/ 
n but it wouldn't register with m'soft). It was a real early 2003  
cisco build.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jul 1, 2009, at 6:28 AM, Ravindra Lakpriya   
wrote:



Hello guys,

This is my first mail to this mailing group.

Im trying to install UCCX in vmware. i have installed Cisco windows  
2003 OS. But it is asking to activate.


Anyone is having any workaround for this ??

when i tried to activate over the internet its saying that this is  
not a valid serial.


Please assist.

--
Ravindra Lakpriya

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] San Jose start time?

[Mike Thompson]

If memory serves, SJ is a little after 8 (8:15 or 8:30, but be early).  RTP
is earlier, I think a 7:30 start (get there about 7am).

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:33 PM
To: Cliff McGlamry; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] San Jose start time?

 

Mine in February was 8:15am.

I think I got there at about 7:30 and sat in the car listening to music.

I think your confirmation e-mail has the time.  Here's a snippet from mine.
Title of the e-mail was "Online Lab Scheduling Confirmation"

 

LAB LOCATION and START TIME:

Cisco Systems

150 West Tasman Drive

Bldg C, 1st floor

San Jose, CA  USA  95134

 

Hours:  8:15am to 5:10pm

 

GENERAL EXAM INFORMATION:

1. Please arrive on time for the exam.  If you arrive late, you will be
expected to finish with the group.  If you arrive more than 2 hours late,
you will not be allowed to start.  The hands-on lab exam runs for 8 hours
with additional time scheduled for the initial exam briefing and a lunch
break.

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:29 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] San Jose start time?

 

I'm looking at Cisco's web site for start time and directions for the lab
exam in San Jose.  I thought they started at 7 AM, but the web site says
8:15 AM start time.  

 

I'm a little confused.  Anyone been over there lately that can comment on
this?  

 

Cliff

 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is different than what happened when calling from phone !!!! , any idea ?

[Mike Thompson]

I don't think you can.  Since TP are all urgent priority, AS SOON as it gets
a match, it will start routing.  If you start your 'Direct to VM' pattern
with a # (or something other than [23]) the first won't match and therefore
will follow the second pattern.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:06 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed num analyzer result is different than
what happened when calling from phone  , any idea ?

 

Hi,

I have 2 TP

[23]xxx
2[23]xxx

Callmanager will not wait for 5th digit to dial and keep matching on first
pattern.
Dialed num analyzer shows that it match second pattern correctly when I dial
22001.

I cleaned up Dial plan report as well, restarted ccm service , but same.

Any idea how can I fix this ?

Jeremy

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] overlapping dialpeer in ccm problem

[Mike Thompson]

As a rule I go int RP report regularly and delete unassigned numbers.  
Not sure of that works withTP, but would assume so


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jun 29, 2009, at 8:29 AM, jeremy co  wrote:


solved,

CCM didn't delete my previous configs ,although I delete TP, It was  
still could be seen in Dial plan report.


Anybody know a good way to make CCM clean up mess like this, that u  
delete sth but it's still in dial plan report?


restarting ccm service didn't help


Any idea ?


On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:50 PM, jeremy co   
wrote:

Hi,

I have to pattern in CCM that overlap and mess up my configs.

[23]xxx -> translate unallocated numbers to CTI and then forward  
it to unity

2[23]xxx  > Direct VM

problem is since first one has less digits it would match , no  
matter how much I narrow down second one , like if I change scond  
one to 2[23][01]xx ,make no difference.


adding "!" to the end of pattern add interdigit delay to that which  
is not desirable.


Any idea ?

Jeremy

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert's CCIE Voice (Blueprint Version3.0) Workbook and Proctor Guide, Volume 1 - Now Shipping!

[Mike Thompson]

IMHO, I'm glad focus was put on content vs  worrying about paper.   
Saving a pack of paper won't get me thru the lab.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jun 29, 2009, at 8:24 AM, Wayne Lawson   
wrote:


It's also very annoying on our end - the only other option is to  
discontinue electronic copies all together.


Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder, President & CEO:
- IPexpert, Inc.
- Proctor Labs, Inc.
- Platinum Solutions Group, LLC.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564

:: Message sent from iPhone.

On Jun 29, 2009, at 8:13 AM, Mike Thompson   
wrote:


I also asked about the unnecessary dead trees. Don't expect any  
change any time soon on that.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jun 29, 2009, at 7:56 AM, "GRAFL Philipp" > wrote:


Same here, my print counter is also reset, I cannot print the  
additional 5C lab. Also a very annoying thing is that I cannot  
print the PDFs double-sided.




Philipp



Von: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 29. Juni 2009 13:42
An: GRAFL Philipp
Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist
Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert's CCIE Voice (Blueprint  
Version3.0) Workbook and Proctor Guide, Volume 1 - Now Shipping!




Negative. Emailed support about 10 mon ago to ask. Also wondering  
if adding 5c reset my print counter for that module. I had a  
misprint first run thru.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.


On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 AM, "GRAFL Philipp" > wrote:


Has anyone got more yet than the 5A_5B_5C Labs in his ebook section?



Philipp



Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
] Im Auftrag von Jeffrey Hall

Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Juni 2009 04:22
An: CCIE Voice Maillist
Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert's CCIE Voice (Blueprint  
Version3.0) Workbook and Proctor Guide, Volume 1 - Now Shipping!




I do see the additional labs 5A_5B_5C thru 13A in the CCIE v3 BP  
Volume 1 section, as well as the proctor guides.


Is this what was supposed to be added, or is there a single  
downloadable file for the entire workbook?


Jeff

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Brian Valentine > wrote:


Hasn't hit my account either.  Maybe it's a global issue.

Brian

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert's CCIE Voice (Blueprint Version3.0) Workbook and Proctor Guide, Volume 1 - Now Shipping!

[Mike Thompson]

I also asked about the unnecessary dead trees. Don't expect any change  
any time soon on that.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jun 29, 2009, at 7:56 AM, "GRAFL Philipp" > wrote:


Same here, my print counter is also reset, I cannot print the  
additional 5C lab. Also a very annoying thing is that I cannot print  
the PDFs double-sided.




Philipp



Von: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 29. Juni 2009 13:42
An: GRAFL Philipp
Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist
Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert's CCIE Voice (Blueprint  
Version3.0) Workbook and Proctor Guide, Volume 1 - Now Shipping!




Negative. Emailed support about 10 mon ago to ask. Also wondering if  
adding 5c reset my print counter for that module. I had a misprint  
first run thru.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.


On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 AM, "GRAFL Philipp" > wrote:


Has anyone got more yet than the 5A_5B_5C Labs in his ebook section?



Philipp



Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
] Im Auftrag von Jeffrey Hall

Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Juni 2009 04:22
An: CCIE Voice Maillist
Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert's CCIE Voice (Blueprint  
Version3.0) Workbook and Proctor Guide, Volume 1 - Now Shipping!




I do see the additional labs 5A_5B_5C thru 13A in the CCIE v3 BP  
Volume 1 section, as well as the proctor guides.


Is this what was supposed to be added, or is there a single  
downloadable file for the entire workbook?


Jeff

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Brian Valentine > wrote:


Hasn't hit my account either.  Maybe it's a global issue.

Brian

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert's CCIE Voice (Blueprint Version3.0) Workbook and Proctor Guide, Volume 1 - Now Shipping!

[Mike Thompson]

Negative. Emailed support about 10 mon ago to ask. Also wondering if  
adding 5c reset my print counter for that module. I had a misprint  
first run thru.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 AM, "GRAFL Philipp" > wrote:



Has anyone got more yet than the 5A_5B_5C Labs in his ebook section?



Philipp



Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
] Im Auftrag von Jeffrey Hall

Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Juni 2009 04:22
An: CCIE Voice Maillist
Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert's CCIE Voice (Blueprint  
Version3.0) Workbook and Proctor Guide, Volume 1 - Now Shipping!




I do see the additional labs 5A_5B_5C thru 13A in the CCIE v3 BP  
Volume 1 section, as well as the proctor guides.


Is this what was supposed to be added, or is there a single  
downloadable file for the entire workbook?


Jeff

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Brian Valentine > wrote:


Hasn't hit my account either.  Maybe it's a global issue.

Brian

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS support over MPLS network in a GRE tunnel

[Mike Thompson]

Benny,
Take a look at the QoS pre-qualify statement. I believe that  
copies the info the gee


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On May 8, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Benny Chung  wrote:


I have a situation where two locations on a MPLS network are using GRE
Tunnel to pass all the traffic. I was just wondering if the GRE header
will copy the TOS bit into MPLS Tag for the network support end to end
QOS? If not is there any way to provide end to end QOS for voice
traffic in a GRE tunnel?

Thanks
Benny

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3560 vs 3750

[Mike Thompson]

For the version 3 lab, has anyone found distinct limitations that would
prevent me from effectively using a 3560 in my lab?

 

I have not been able to find any discernable difference in the port QoS
config that would cause any issues.

 

Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Mike