Re: Cisco Visio Icons
Dear Smith, You can get the icons you need in the Cisco Config Maker Solftware utility..!! http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/nemnsw/cm/index.shtml Hope this helps your need..! -Chitla Suhdir CCNA, NCIP, CNA Network Analyst, Navayuga Infotech, India. --- Karen Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello guys, Could anyone tell me how can I get the icons for Visio Cisco uses on their books, such as routers, switches, etc? Are they copyrighted or can you actually use/purchase them? If so, are there other icons similar available elsewhere? I purchased Visio Professional but it didn't come with the generic icons cisco uses. Thanks, Karen Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.in address at http://mail.yahoo.co.in _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Subject
RE: cross-over roll-over : Here is THE simplest rule
On Mar 8, 3:01am, Bernard wrote: } } The rule is: } connecting devices of the same OSI layer, use cross-over cable. } connecting devices of different layers, use straight through. Hubs are at layer 1 and switches are at layer 2. If you're connecting a hub to a switch, you need to use a crossover cable. So, this rule doesn't work. The real rule is, if you're connecting a hub/switch to a hub/switch use a crossover, otherwise use a straight through cable. }-- End of excerpt from Bernard _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE 350-001: prep kit question.
On Mar 8, 5:00am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } } CCIE 350-001: prep kit } } page 332 "netBIOS is not routable, but NetBEUI is" } } Is this right? I thought that NetBEUI was unroutable? No. First off, NetBIOS is not a network protocol, it is an API (i.e. a way for an application program to use a networking protocol). So, asking whether NetBIOS is routable or not is a nonsensical question. NetBEUI is a networking protocol. It does not have the concept of a network address, only a host address, so you are right that it is non-routable. }-- End of excerpt from [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Subject
__ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CPU utlization of a single voip cirtcuit
Our company is planning to implement VoIP on top of existing cisco network and I'm conducting network audit. Can somebody advise me the resource consumption in term of CPU utilization / Buffer utilization across all platforms (26XX ... 75xx) for a single voip circuit ? My logic if my current 4700 spends 40% CPU utilization on pure data and each voice circuits (50 pps) consumes 2%, I should not put more than 10 circuits to keep cpu in the safe zone of 60%. Similar logics for buffer. The assumption of voice circuit is: VoIP, G.729r8, no VAD. If you have conducted such kind of network audit for voip implementation before, appreciate if you can share with me privately. Thanks. Yuenme _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RE: CID Test]
I used Cisco Internetwork Design by Matthew Birkner (Cisco Press) and used Boson practice tests. I passed with 87%. I don't think I could have passed without the Boson practice tests. A. Strobel "Taylor, Don" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Attachment: MIME Type: multipart/alternative - Forget the Cisco Press book; in my opinion it bounces around from topic to topic and doesn't address any single item deeply enough to be terribly helpful. Top-Down is a good book for all around network design topics, but isn't geared toward the exam. My personal preference for CID preparedness is Robert Padjen's (Sybex) Cisco Internetwork Design. - Don -Original Message- From: Hubert Pun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 9:13 PM To: Cisco Study Group Subject: CID Test I am planning to write the CID test. Which book, the Cisco Press CID book or the Top Down Network is more useful for passing the exam? and btw, which book is more useful for the CCIE written exam? and which one is actually more useful in real life? thanks in advanced _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
passed CCNP
_ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: isdn question
What about put a dialer map in Router B without a number to call ? That should work. Regards, Sebastien. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Sent: 09 November 2000 07:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: isdn question I am trying to setup an isdn scenerio, where routerA has 1 B channel, and routerB has 1 B channel. routerA calls routerB, and then traffic bi-directionally flows over the single B channel. What i am running into though, is if I leave the dialer map off routerB, then it complains "no dialer string" for the return path packets. If I put the dialer map in place, it complains "no channel available" (because its "busy" since its already connected from answering routerA's call). So my question is, how do you get the traffic to flow bi-directional over a single channel, so that routerB needs no dialer map. routerA === interface BRI0 ip address 212.1.22.146 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp bandwidth 128 dialer wait-for-carrier-time 10 dialer map ip 212.1.22.145 6711173 dialer-group 1 isdn spid1 31867111720101 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 212.1.22.145 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit routerB === interface BRI0 ip address 212.1.22.145 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp bandwidth 128 isdn spid1 31867111730101 dialer wait-for-carrier-time 10 dialer-group 1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 212.1.22.146 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit Thanks for any help, Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Do You Yahoo!? Achetez, vendez! À votre prix! Sur http://encheres.yahoo.fr _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAgP Message
Title: PAgP Message Hi, I am preparing for the CCNP Exams. I would like to know the reason for the following messages i am getting on my 6009 switch. 6000 (enable) 2000 Nov 07 01:39:08 %PAGP-5-PORTFROMSTP:Port 2/46 left bridg e port 2/46 2000 Nov 07 01:39:10 %PAGP-5-PORTTOSTP:Port 2/46 joined bridge port 2/46 2000 Nov 07 01:41:36 %PAGP-5-PORTFROMSTP:Port 2/32 left bridge port 2/32 2000 Nov 07 01:41:37 %PAGP-5-PORTTOSTP:Port 2/32 joined bridge port 2/32 2000 Nov 07 01:43:35 %PAGP-5-PORTFROMSTP:Port 2/32 left bridge port 2/32 2000 Nov 07 01:43:37 %PAGP-5-PORTTOSTP:Port 2/32 joined bridge port 2/32 This results in frequent disconnections from the ports. Need your suggestions Regds Amit
RE: Why not supernetting?
You might think also to implement MLS (Multi Layer Switching) in your Catalyst 5500, after you have followed Peter recommendations. Sebastien. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Van Oene Sent: 09 November 2000 00:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Why not supernetting? Outside of anything more "best practice design" specific which others are and I'm sure will cover, I would look at your 100 meg downlinks (connections from edge switches to aggregation switches back to 5500 in increasing order of importance) Specifically, check to ensure that your duplexes on either end of the connections are set the same. Futher, look at error counts (crc's, runts etc) to ensure that these links are performing adequately. I've seen duplex mismatches cause exactly this type of "tragic" performance as you describe it. Peter *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 11/8/2000 at 2:13 PM jeongwoo park wrote: Hi All, I am looking for advice on a LAN performance issue. i am running primarily NT4 and win2K boxes on a 100Mbit UTP Ethernet LAN. my servers are on static IPs on one subnet while my clients pick up DHCP addresses (assigned out of my control) in any one of half a dozen other subnets. file transfer and printing performance between client and server is averaging 1Mbit/sec when computers are in different subnets. switch the same two computers to static IPs in the same subnet and throughput jumps to a respectable 30-70Mbit/sec. i need to keep the clients on DHCP as i don't have enough static IPs to go around for the subnet the servers are in. all clients and servers are attached to one of 5 Allied Telesyn 8126XL 24-port managed switches. all 5 of these "edge" switches connect to another switch of the same model with a 100Mbit multi-mode (1300 nanometer) fiber uplink which connects to a Cisco Catalyst 5500 for our routing needs. When the clients are on different subnets the file transfers appear to take a long trip through the router with a huge performance penalty (1Mbit/sec). when the client and server are on the same subnet the packets do NOT appear to be routed (perhaps they are handled using ARP?) and the performance is very good. ping response times on both switches and routers is under 20ms. This is where I believe supernetting could be a solution to this slowness, because I think supernetting allows me to put all stations in the same subnet, witch avoids routing needs. I got some responses to my previous post from people saying that supernetting would slow down the speed because there would be too many stations in big broadcast domain, which contradicts what I am willing to do. Am i missing some key concepts here that might improve my understanding of this tragic performance? any help would be greatly appreciated. take care, jw __ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Do You Yahoo!? Achetez, vendez! À votre prix! Sur http://encheres.yahoo.fr _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CID (640-025)
Unless I'm reading this wrong the question refers to the CID test while the answer below refers to the DCN test. Read Advanced IP Network Design Cisco Press. Routing TCPIP - The illusive Jeff Doyle and IF you want CCIE network design fundamentals. Enjoy! -Original Message- From: Croyle, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 November 2000 20:29 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: CID (640-025) After reading Priscilla's book, I read the Cisco Press DCN, and finished the test in 90 minutes, got 830 or so, and thought it was the most straight forward Cisco test yet. Hint. Draw the case studies in completely, and refer back to them. Don't redraw, and add detail each time, that is simply a time-waster. Jim Croyle Network Engineer PS Thanks Priscilla for your assistance, both in this list, and from the book on my shelf. :-) -Original Message- From: Carl Mirsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CID (640-025) Howdy Folks. Just passed my CIT yesterday and finished my CCNP. Another goofy test. Unlike the other exams, there were no choices to select for the fill-ins. You need to know your CLI commands. I would like to thank everyone on this list for helping me out. I am planning on taking the CID next. What are the best study guides for the exam in your opinion? I already have Top Down by Priscilla and have read this for the CCDA. Thanks for your input. " Integrity Can Be Communicated" Carl Mirsky CCNP, MCSE, SCSA Technical Solutions Consultant Sprint ENS _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CID or Core Tests?
I personally would get your CCNP before your conquest on to the CID. The CID is the hardest exam in the series of NP/DP. It also bears no resemblance to the DCN. The DCN is more scenarios, whereas the CID is more into the actual workings of the protocols. In my opinion I would never have passed the CID without first taking the CCNP track. My 2p -Original Message- From: Mike McDaniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2000 03:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID or Core Tests? I have been a fly on the wall for some time. I have been able to find the answers to most of my questions from the archives or current threads, but this one has me stumped. I have had my CCNA for about a year and just recently passed the DCN test. keeping in mind I wish to complete CCNP/DP certifications, my questions is as follows. Should I sit the CID test and get that out of the way while the DCN info is fresh, or should I take the core tests to prepare for the CID? I'm leaning towards CID, but would like feedback from those who have been there. TIA, Mike _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP PC cards... Help
Dear All, We are planning to implement VoIP solution with low budget. Could any one give me the details about the VoIP PC Cards like Micom Voice Cards. I was told that "Micom Voice Cards" are not available in the market is that's true..? Thanks, Chitla Sudhir CCNA, NCIP, CNA Network Analyst, India. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.in address at http://mail.yahoo.co.in _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Interface and Routing!
Remember to add the word "broadcast" on to the end of your dialer map statement or else the routing updates will not traverse your ISDN line. -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 November 2000 22:19 To: Hans Schimek Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup Interface and Routing! On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Hans Schimek wrote: Hi! i configured a serial link and an ISDN link between two routers. the serial line is the primary line. if it fails the backup line ISDN-Interface) takes over. i configured RIP - To prevent Routing Updates from establishing the call i set the ISDN-Interface as PASSIVE. Updates didn`t initate the call anymore. BUT ! what about the routing information. if the primary fails, no routing updates won`t flow. so i configured static routes with a higher administrative distance - configure the static route with a high AD like you did. Don't make the BRI passive, instead just use a dialer-list to define RIP as "uninteresting". Something like this: interface BRI0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp bandwidth 128 isdn spid2 00055512130101 dialer map ip 192.168.1.2 5551212 dialer-group 1 ! router rip network 192.168.1.0 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 240 access-list 101 deny udp any any eq rip access-list 101 permit ip any any ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 101 IS THERE ANOTHER SOLUTION FOR THAT PROBLEM ! thanx in advance = Hans Schimek Student Fachhochschule St. Pölten f. Telekommunikation und Medien mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gsm : +43 699 10605315 fax : +43 3613 2311 4 icq : 22308773 www : www.schimek.net = _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Useful CCNA Study Material
Folks, For those of you who are about to take the CCNA test the following link :- http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/index.htm a lot of the info here will help you with this test. typically I found this stuff AFTER I sat the exam .. RgS Peter. Peter McCracken Technical Consultant DMR Consulting Ireland 00 353 1 813 6944 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NT1 needed
On Feb 5, 4:46am, Brian wrote: } } Does anyone know of an NT1 model that will allow the connection of 2 S/T } interfaces (2 different routers) so that each can use a single chennel of } the single ISDN line connected to it (like a splitter). The S/T bus is a parallel bus. You can connect up to eight devices to it (they are distinguished by their TEI -- Terminal Endpoint Idenifier). You don't need a special NT1, just a splitter which you plug into any NT1. I have seen eight-way splitters built just for this purpose, but I don't know where to get them. }-- End of excerpt from Brian _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrade Cisco 2610
Hi Guys, in my site there is a Cisco Router 2610 with the following hardware and software configuration: Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.0(5)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 17-Aug-99 13:11 by cmong ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) roma uptime is 2 weeks, 5 days, 22 hours, 47 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on at 10:44:34 UTC Fri Jan 7 2000 System image file is "flash:c2600-d-mz.120-5.T1" cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x203) with 20480K/4096K bytes of memory . Processor board ... M860 processor: part number 0, mask 49 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 2 Low-speed serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 4 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2102 The WIC ( 2 Serial Sync/Async) are busy for two sites, i must do a new site with a link at 2 Mbit. The configuration hardware ( 2 Low speed serial), of course, don't support the new link. With this architecture Can I repalce the WIC Low Speed Serial with the other WIC Serial (Sync/Async) at 2 Mbit? Regards, Carmelo _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Classes for CCNP
Take the BSCN and BCMSN courses. IMHO these are the hardest exams out of the four. I did actually go on the CIT course, but some of what this covers is in the routing and switching courses. I bought the 'Building Cisco Remote Access Networks' book by Tom Thomas, and along with the relevant Boson testers managed to attain my CCNP. Regards Shaun Wakelen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 8:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Classes for CCNP Hello all. I have a small dilemma and I need your opinions...my employer will allow me to take two of the four classes for CCNP. Which two are the most important/hardest? BCMSN, BSCN, BCRAN, CIT? Thanks! -j This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged, confidential and/or copyright information and is for the sole use of the intended addressee. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium.This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual relationship between Telindus K-NET Ltd and you. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3640 and 12.09 IOS
Does the 3640 with 12.09 support the "Format and Squeeze" commands. as its coming up with unrecognised command response. On Cisco website it covers partitioning, erasing flash but not formatting. it also covers Copying a File from a Flash Memory Card to System Flash Memory, but not squeeze command. Both commands are not highlighted in the s/w bug listed for 12.09 and 3640. Any advise appreciated _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ################### CCIE LAB Scenarios ######################
www.ccbootcamp.com is the best. www.fatkid.com is free. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN and VOICE cables for back to back connectivity
hi friends I am Ravi Kumar from Hyderabad, INDIA. I have 2* 2610 routers with 2 port sync/async card, 1 port ISDN BRI card and 2 port FXS card installed in VM. I am using these routers exclusively for my CCNP 2.0 training and preparation. I have DTE and DCE cables for two routers back to back connectivity to simulate leased lines. are there any cables with which I can simulate ISDN connectivity as well as VoIP connectivity?? your help is highly apreciated in advance. with regards ravi kumar B. Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrade Cisco 2600
Hi Guys, in my site there is a Cisco Router 2610 with the following hardware and software configuration: Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.0(5)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 17-Aug-99 13:11 by cmong ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) roma uptime is 2 weeks, 5 days, 22 hours, 47 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on at 10:44:34 UTC Fri Jan 7 2000 System image file is "flash:c2600-d-mz.120-5.T1" cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x203) with 20480K/4096K bytes of memory . Processor board ... M860 processor: part number 0, mask 49 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 2 Low-speed serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 4 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2102 The WIC ( 2 Serial Sync/Async) are busy for two sites, i must do a new site with a link at 2 Mbit. The configuration hardware ( 2 Low speed serial), of course, don't support the new link. With this architecture Can I repalce the WIC Low Speed Serial with the other WIC Serial (Sync/Async) at 2 Mbit? Regards, Carmelo Carmelo Garofalo System Support SAS Italy +39 (06) 32816650 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAS ... The Power to Know _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about 3600 as voip gateway
as we know ,3620 has 2 NM slot ,3640 has 4 slots . if i use NM-HDV-1E1-30E,how many such NM could each 3620 or 3640 support at maximum? and we also could use NM-HDV-2E1-60 . Does the router have the capability limit to support NMs? AS5300 could support 4 E1 at max. Thanks . frank _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
telnet
Hi, Can anyone help on this.I do a VPN connection on a client machine on to my network.when the connection is established, I get assigned an IP address.Then I try to telnet unto my servers which refuse the connection.I have a firewall in between doing NAT.I can ping the firewall alright but cant telnet. would be grateful if I can get any help. cheers, Dennis _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: password recovery on lightstream hyperswitch 100
That's actually for a LS1010. The password recovery on a LS100 is unbeliveably complicated. You have to enter a very cryptic string from a hidden menu on the LS100. I had to do it on mine, so you'll need to call TAC and open a case to get this resolved. There is no, "set the config register to o/r 0x142" or the like. I wrote it down on top of my LS100, but it's at the office and I don't want to give you one charachter off of that string and lock up your 100. So, just give TAC a call (provided you have any valid contract on Cisco equipment) and they will get it straightened out. Hope this helps. Regards, Frank Zahrt, CCDP, CCNP(voice) NEC Senior Network Engineer --- Sam Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_1600.html Enjoy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Jensen Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 8:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: password recovery on lightstream hyperswitch 100 Hi I acquired one of these switches and do not know the password. Any help or pointers on recovering the password would be appreciated. Craig _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade Cisco 2600
Carmelo If you are using both serials. Are they in the expansion slot or in the WAN slots. If you have a spare WAN slot you could use a WIC 2 T to give you 2 high speed ports. How have you got the 4 ISDN ports into the router ? Dave Carmelo Garofalo [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] a.sas.com cc: Sent by:Subject: Upgrade Cisco 2600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] m 11/09/2000 11:14 Please respond to Carmelo Garofalo Hi Guys, in my site there is a Cisco Router 2610 with the following hardware and software configuration: Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.0(5)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 17-Aug-99 13:11 by cmong ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) roma uptime is 2 weeks, 5 days, 22 hours, 47 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on at 10:44:34 UTC Fri Jan 7 2000 System image file is "flash:c2600-d-mz.120-5.T1" cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x203) with 20480K/4096K bytes of memory . Processor board ... M860 processor: part number 0, mask 49 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 2 Low-speed serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 4 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2102 The WIC ( 2 Serial Sync/Async) are busy for two sites, i must do a new site with a link at 2 Mbit. The configuration hardware ( 2 Low speed serial), of course, don't support the new link. With this architecture Can I repalce the WIC Low Speed Serial with the other WIC Serial (Sync/Async) at 2 Mbit? Regards, Carmelo Carmelo Garofalo System Support SAS Italy +39 (06) 32816650 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAS ... The Power to Know _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colt test
Hi group I am currently studying towards CCNA, How good are the colt tests for determining my current level? If I passed the colt test do I have a shot at the real thing? all input valuable. thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice for lab
I believe you can get a 1750-2V (that supports one voice card) or a 1750-4V, that supports tow voice cards. Ed "John Dill" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The least expensive way to go is get a 1750. The 1750 uses the same personality (VIC = FXS, EM, FXO) cards as the 2600 and you do not need the extra (expensive) voice processor card like the 2600. Careful. The 1750 DOES require a voice processor card, a PVDM-4 will provide DSP resources for one VIC card. It lists for $400, and it is not included in the base model. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: telnet
Dennis, Can I assume that the servers that you are trying to access allow telnet sessions ? If you are using a PIX firewall and an IRE client you might try this: telnet 10.127.6.5 255.255.254.0 inside telnet timeout 5 where 10.127.6.5 is the PIX inside IP address. it works in my lab. rgds, Manolito -Original Message- From: Dennis Ighomereho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 7:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: telnet Hi, Can anyone help on this.I do a VPN connection on a client machine on to my network.when the connection is established, I get assigned an IP address.Then I try to telnet unto my servers which refuse the connection.I have a firewall in between doing NAT.I can ping the firewall alright but cant telnet. would be grateful if I can get any help. cheers, Dennis _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM Question about LEC
I'm no guru, but that's what I've seen when the LEC didn't or couldn't talk to the LECS. Usually, a config error, like a fat-fingered ATM address or missing command on the LEC. Rodgers Moore ""TheFish"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8udadn$j2a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8udadn$j2a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anyone who is an ATM guru know why? LEC Client ID is unassigned.Why? Thanks, KT _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pairgain T1
It depends on the exact model, but in general NO. Pairgain was never really a CSU/DSU company, but rather a HDSL T1 repeater/extender company. They did make a few models that would take T1 on the network side, but I don't remember if these had v.35 options on the DSU side. Is this a two or a four wire version? If it's a four wire, then it may be possible. You can always try it. If it doesn't work, then do something else. Rodgers Moore "Frank Kim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi folks, I have a Pairgain T1 campus with a DSX-1/v.35 interface. Can this be used to attached to a T1? Thanks for any input. -Frank _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 books for $6 - check it out.
hello everyone ! Couldn't help - visit this site: you can get 3 books for 6 bucks and 1 additional for free. I still don't know what the catch is, but you can get CCIE/CCDP study guides too. 4 decent study guides for 6 bucks - why not ?? I ordered (didn't get yet). http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?62204 note: I am no affiliated with zdnet at all. Nodir _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Radius or Tacacs
Brian, How do you propose to configure the user id password into the PIX? There's no command to allow this. So you won't be doing any authentication, except the pre-shared key which is the same for everyone. One password between your LAN and the Internet. Feel safe? You could install Radius for NT, it comes on the Option Pack 4 CD and is free. It won't work without the radius/IIS service pack 6 and some other upgrade (I forget the name). Just be forwarned, with this software you get "exactly" what you pay for. Rodgers Moore ""Parris, Brian"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Could somebody please explain to me why I would want a Radius Server when authenticating a VPN client through my PIX on an NT Server network rather than just authenticating locally on the PIX. Also, what is the advantage of Tacacs and is there any software that can perform these duties for less than the $4000 that the Steel-Belted Radius and CiscoSecure ACS software cost. I'm not going to have but a few users and can't justify these prices. TIA, Brian Parris Network Admin. www.carotek.com http://www.carotek.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Re: How to verify the CIR from my router?]
Nooo. To find CIR through Bandwith statement is not a right criteria becausee if we are using IGRP/EIGRP , we need to play with Bandwidth statement to select primary and secondary routes so we might need to change them different as Actual CIR,.. True, but "show frame map" IS the actual CIR as presented to your equipment by the Frame Relay Switch. That's the only point I was making. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Concentrator 3030
Hello, I have 2 questions regarding win2000 client for Concentrator 3030: 1. I tested win2000 client beta, everything works fine except I can't browse the network neighbor. I can map drive and use computer names to ping, telnet. 2. I tried to use Certificate service provided by Windows 2000 server. After I submitted certificate request, I can see it's pending on the server, but when I check pending request on the client, it says no pending. Any suggestion would be greately appreciated!!! Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
token ring question
Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Cisco 2610
Hi Sasa, sorry , I would want to write, if i can replace the WIC Serial (Sync/Async), with speed up to 128kb, with the WIC-2T interface. In conclusion, is it possibile do I have a router with two WIC-2T in slots? Please you answer me . Regards, Carmelo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 2:14 PM To: carmelo Garofalo Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrade Cisco 2610 carmelo Garofalo wrote: With this architecture Can I repalce the WIC Low Speed Serial with the other WIC Serial (Sync/Async) at 2 Mbit? There's no WIC sync/async for 2 Mbps. But, WIC-2T (two port, 2 Mbps SYNC serial) with do the job. Sasa _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NT1 needed
Brian, I have seen this done where six ISDN phones were connected to a BRI but only two could be used at one time. Mike John Nemeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/09 5:34 AM On Feb 5, 4:46am, Brian wrote: } } Does anyone know of an NT1 model that will allow the connection of 2 S/T } interfaces (2 different routers) so that each can use a single chennel of } the single ISDN line connected to it (like a splitter). The S/T bus is a parallel bus. You can connect up to eight devices to it (they are distinguished by their TEI -- Terminal Endpoint Idenifier). You don't need a special NT1, just a splitter which you plug into any NT1. I have seen eight-way splitters built just for this purpose, but I don't know where to get them. }-- End of excerpt from Brian _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why not supernetting?
Your problem seems to be insufficient hardware. Supernetting five subnets and putting 500 stations on one segement will cripple your network. Duck - Original Message - From: jeongwoo park [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Groupstudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:13 PM Subject: Why not supernetting? Hi All, I am looking for advice on a LAN performance issue. i am running primarily NT4 and win2K boxes on a 100Mbit UTP Ethernet LAN. my servers are on static IPs on one subnet while my clients pick up DHCP addresses (assigned out of my control) in any one of half a dozen other subnets. file transfer and printing performance between client and server is averaging 1Mbit/sec when computers are in different subnets. switch the same two computers to static IPs in the same subnet and throughput jumps to a respectable 30-70Mbit/sec. i need to keep the clients on DHCP as i don't have enough static IPs to go around for the subnet the servers are in. all clients and servers are attached to one of 5 Allied Telesyn 8126XL 24-port managed switches. all 5 of these "edge" switches connect to another switch of the same model with a 100Mbit multi-mode (1300 nanometer) fiber uplink which connects to a Cisco Catalyst 5500 for our routing needs. When the clients are on different subnets the file transfers appear to take a long trip through the router with a huge performance penalty (1Mbit/sec). when the client and server are on the same subnet the packets do NOT appear to be routed (perhaps they are handled using ARP?) and the performance is very good. ping response times on both switches and routers is under 20ms. This is where I believe supernetting could be a solution to this slowness, because I think supernetting allows me to put all stations in the same subnet, witch avoids routing needs. I got some responses to my previous post from people saying that supernetting would slow down the speed because there would be too many stations in big broadcast domain, which contradicts what I am willing to do. Am i missing some key concepts here that might improve my understanding of this tragic performance? any help would be greatly appreciated. take care, jw __ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off Topic ***********Please Help Nortell**
HEllo At my business we have a Nortel Accellar 1100 , one question i have is how to redistribute static routes via OSPF. I could not find this info in my notes and I'm not even sure if it is possible. Please let me know how this could be accomplished !! Thanks Jim Koniecki _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4 books for $6 - check it out.
Well, like in any club ;) Since I buy about 1-2 computer book a month anyway, I found it as a good deal. You're right, if you don't plan to get books later on - it's just not worth it. Terms Conditions don't specify how long you are obligated to be in the "club".. Thanks for comments ! Nodir On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Carl Mirsky wrote: Here is the catch. Basically you will get a book in the mail every so often, and get billed for it including S/H. I had joined a CD club a couple of years back with the "free" CD's. Well, the S/H was billed for EACH CD and was almost as much as the CD's would have cost me in the store, and they will keep coming. You will need to notify them EACH AND EVERY TIME that you don't want their "featured selection". Is it a good deal? Maybe. Depends on how much you think you will be saving. I can guarantee you that their "featured selection" will most likely not be what you are interested in. IMNSHO. How does the club work? You'll receive our free club magazine about every 3 weeks, up to 18 times a year, featuring a Main Selection for the club along with a dated reply card. Choose from the current Main and Alternate Selections, or from a selection of recently offered titles. NOTE:-- If you want the Main Selection, do nothing, and it will be sent to you automatically. If you prefer another selection, or no book at all, simply indicate your choice on the dated reply card included in the Announcement and return it by the date specified. You can do it through the mail, or right here, online! A shipping-and-handling charge (and sales tax, where applicable) is added to each shipment. --: END NOTE Carl Mirsky CCNP, MCSE, SCSA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nodir Nazarov Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4 books for $6 - check it out. hello everyone ! Couldn't help - visit this site: you can get 3 books for 6 bucks and 1 additional for free. I still don't know what the catch is, but you can get CCIE/CCDP study guides too. 4 decent study guides for 6 bucks - why not ?? I ordered (didn't get yet). http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?62204 note: I am no affiliated with zdnet at all. Nodir _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: After supernetting!!
If we look at this question in terms of moving the network mask to the left or to the right, all of these terms come into perspective. Take the mask ... Ones indicate the network portion. Zeros indicate the host portion. If we shrink ( move to the left ) the zeros, we are, depending upon the context, summarizing, supernetting, aggregating. If we expand ( move to the right ) the ones, we are subnetting. If we start with the same network mask, and expand the ones differently for several different subnets, we are variably subnetting, or using VLSM. I think it is more useful to understand what is happening at the bit level than to worry about terminology that is admittedly used sloppily in the various study materials we use. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Donald B Johnson Jr Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:15 PM To: Brian; jeongwoo park Cc: Groupstudy Subject:Re: After supernetting!! I thought supernetting was combining several small networks into one big one, the opposite of subnetting which takes one big network and breaks it into smaller ones. Summarizing is a technique where you combine several larger perfixs into one smaller prefix that includes the larger perfixs and then advertise the smaller prefix in routing updates. This technique reduces routing table entries. Aggregation and VLSM are different too. These terms are not interchangable. You should really have a clear understanding of these concepts for the big one. Duck - Original Message - From: Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jeongwoo park [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Groupstudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 8:57 AM Subject: Re: After supernetting!! On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, jeongwoo park wrote: Hi all Let's say there are 5 subnets (Class B/16 subnet mask) consisting of approximately 500 DHCP clients and 20 servers. Someone as a Network Expert suggested flattening the network. As a Network newbie, I simply followed the instruction from the book on how to supernet, and finally summarized those 5 contiguous subnets into following address: 123.80.0.0/14 (**this is a made-up number) Now I am done with supernetting. What is the next to be done? What should I do with this ip address? Should I go to physically to these 520 stations one by one for new tcp/ip setup? I think there should be better way than this. Supernetting, summarizing, whatever you want to call it, at aggregation points within your network is a great idea, so yes I agree that somewhere in your network you should try to aggregate routes as much as possible. Flattening a /14 worth of space and giving users a 255.252.0.0 netmask on their desktops sounds more like "Super-kludging" than "supernetting" :) Why would you have 520 stations consuming a /14 worth of space anyways? Brian Looking for your help. Thanks jw __ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4 books for $6 - check it out.
Here is the catch. Basically you will get a book in the mail every so often, and get billed for it including S/H. I had joined a CD club a couple of years back with the "free" CD's. Well, the S/H was billed for EACH CD and was almost as much as the CD's would have cost me in the store, and they will keep coming. You will need to notify them EACH AND EVERY TIME that you don't want their "featured selection". Is it a good deal? Maybe. Depends on how much you think you will be saving. I can guarantee you that their "featured selection" will most likely not be what you are interested in. IMNSHO. How does the club work? You'll receive our free club magazine about every 3 weeks, up to 18 times a year, featuring a Main Selection for the club along with a dated reply card. Choose from the current Main and Alternate Selections, or from a selection of recently offered titles. NOTE:-- If you want the Main Selection, do nothing, and it will be sent to you automatically. If you prefer another selection, or no book at all, simply indicate your choice on the dated reply card included in the Announcement and return it by the date specified. You can do it through the mail, or right here, online! A shipping-and-handling charge (and sales tax, where applicable) is added to each shipment. --: END NOTE Carl Mirsky CCNP, MCSE, SCSA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nodir Nazarov Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4 books for $6 - check it out. hello everyone ! Couldn't help - visit this site: you can get 3 books for 6 bucks and 1 additional for free. I still don't know what the catch is, but you can get CCIE/CCDP study guides too. 4 decent study guides for 6 bucks - why not ?? I ordered (didn't get yet). http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?62204 note: I am no affiliated with zdnet at all. Nodir _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: token ring question
Try it. From: Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:34:34 -0600 (CST) Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: isdn question
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Sebastien Venturoso wrote: What about put a dialer map in Router B without a number to call ? That should work. I don't believe thats valid is it? Brian Regards, Sebastien. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Sent: 09 November 2000 07:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: isdn question I am trying to setup an isdn scenerio, where routerA has 1 B channel, and routerB has 1 B channel. routerA calls routerB, and then traffic bi-directionally flows over the single B channel. What i am running into though, is if I leave the dialer map off routerB, then it complains "no dialer string" for the return path packets. If I put the dialer map in place, it complains "no channel available" (because its "busy" since its already connected from answering routerA's call). So my question is, how do you get the traffic to flow bi-directional over a single channel, so that routerB needs no dialer map. routerA === interface BRI0 ip address 212.1.22.146 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp bandwidth 128 dialer wait-for-carrier-time 10 dialer map ip 212.1.22.145 6711173 dialer-group 1 isdn spid1 31867111720101 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 212.1.22.145 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit routerB === interface BRI0 ip address 212.1.22.145 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp bandwidth 128 isdn spid1 31867111730101 dialer wait-for-carrier-time 10 dialer-group 1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 212.1.22.146 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit Thanks for any help, Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Do You Yahoo!? Achetez, vendez! À votre prix! Sur http://encheres.yahoo.fr --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pairgain T1
Title: RE: pairgain T1 Check out the following http://www.pairgain.com/PRODUCTS/enterprise_lan/cmpscsu.asp In my experience if you have a DSX-1 interface it will connect to a T1. The main difference being the signal amplitude the DS1 will go up to 6k and the DSX1 will go up to 655ft -Original Message- From: Rodgers Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 10:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pairgain T1 It depends on the exact model, but in general NO. Pairgain was never really a CSU/DSU company, but rather a HDSL T1 repeater/extender company. They did make a few models that would take T1 on the network side, but I don't remember if these had v.35 options on the DSU side. Is this a two or a four wire version? If it's a four wire, then it may be possible. You can always try it. If it doesn't work, then do something else. Rodgers Moore Frank Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]" TARGET="_blank">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi folks, I have a Pairgain T1 campus with a DSX-1/v.35 interface. Can this be used to attached to a T1? Thanks for any input. -Frank _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing protocol
I dont think the original question made any sense. Duck - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lawrence sculark [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:37 PM Subject: Re: Routing protocol A bunch of different concepts are getting mixed up in this discussion. Here's a quick note to clear the air. A routing protocol learns the path(s) to remote networks. Examples are OSPF, RIP, EIGRP, BGP, RTMP, AURP, Novell RIP and NLSP, etc. EIGRP is a routing protocol that can handle routing for IP, AppleTalk, and IPX. That makes it unique. It has a routing engine that can be used by each of these protocol suites, as well as separate mechanisms to deal with unique issues for each suite. This multiprotocol feature of EIGRP has nothing to do with redistribution. Redistribution is the process whereby a routing protocol can learn routes from some other routing protocol. For example, you can redistribute RIP routes into OSPF. I don't know if this is what the responder had in mind, but by default, the Cisco IOS software redistributes AppleTalk RTMP routes into AppleTalk EIGRP, and vice versa. By default, the Cisco IOS software redistributes IPX RIP routes into EIGRP, and vice versa. These are nice features for companies that still run RTMP and IPX RIP on their LANs but have migrated to the more efficient EIGRP on WANs. Cisco made up the silly term "routed protocol," and they use it somewhat inconsistently. But in general, it means the network-layer protocol that carries the payload that gets routed through the network. Examples include IP, DDP, IPX, etc. A router has two jobs: 1) Participating in a routing protocol to learn paths 2) Forwarding routed traffic (This is sometimes called switching, just to confuse matters) OK, that's enough for now. Priscilla At 03:08 PM 11/8/00, lawrence sculark wrote: look up "redistribution"..it will set you on the right path...lawrence From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Routing protocol I don't think this make sense. Routing protocols are used to maintain routing tables. Routed protocols are used for addressing and accessing stations on a network. The process of routing is the ability of a router being able to receive a packet, check the destination in the packet, look for a destination network in the route table and switch the packet to the appropriate interface that can reach the destination network. So routing is the process of: 1. declaring a destination 2. finding the destinaton 3. switching the packet to an interface on the path to the destination. Many protocols are involved in this process from ARP to BGP or anything in between. Duck AVI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other protocols Is it EIGRP or BGP Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help for study purpose
I am new to cisco and just started reading for the CCNA Exam. I am having one 2501 CISCO Router and I will like to make use of the aux port connected to a modem to dial to the internet. I tried to configure the aux line usin "line aux 0" but was unable to configure PPP with this interface. My IOS Ver is 11.0. Any hint on how to o this shall be higly appreciated. Francis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NT1 needed
On Apr 1, 3:29am, "Mike Momb" wrote: } } I have seen this done where six ISDN phones were connected to a BRI but only two could be used at one time. Yes, that is because there are only two B channels. } John Nemeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/09 5:34 AM } On Feb 5, 4:46am, Brian wrote: } } } } Does anyone know of an NT1 model that will allow the connection of 2 S/T } } interfaces (2 different routers) so that each can use a single chennel of } } the single ISDN line connected to it (like a splitter). } } The S/T bus is a parallel bus. You can connect up to eight } devices to it (they are distinguished by their TEI -- Terminal Endpoint } Idenifier). You don't need a special NT1, just a splitter which you } plug into any NT1. I have seen eight-way splitters built just for this } purpose, but I don't know where to get them. } }-- End of excerpt from "Mike Momb" _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT1 needed
http://www.nt1solutions.com/ makes NT-1 devices and splitters. -Original Message- From: Mike Momb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 7:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NT1 needed Brian, I have seen this done where six ISDN phones were connected to a BRI but only two could be used at one time. Mike John Nemeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/09 5:34 AM On Feb 5, 4:46am, Brian wrote: } } Does anyone know of an NT1 model that will allow the connection of 2 S/T } interfaces (2 different routers) so that each can use a single chennel of } the single ISDN line connected to it (like a splitter). The S/T bus is a parallel bus. You can connect up to eight devices to it (they are distinguished by their TEI -- Terminal Endpoint Idenifier). You don't need a special NT1, just a splitter which you plug into any NT1. I have seen eight-way splitters built just for this purpose, but I don't know where to get them. }-- End of excerpt from Brian _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get Paid To Read Email!
This is awesome! Rajeev KS here! I just had to tell you about SendMoreInfo.com! You get paid to read email! They send you information about things you are interested in and they pay you to check it out! Here's the link: http://www.sendmoreinfo.com/id/1019293 I know you are going to love this web site! Talk to you soon! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boson CCIE Written Practice test
Boson is completely rewriting CCIE #1 and CCIE #2. We will be releasing it shortly. John Swartz CCIE, MCSD, MCSE+I, CNE Boson Software http://www.boson.com We are looking for practice test authors. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Jeff, I just passed 350-001 on Nov 1 and I ordered the BOSON test around Oct 29. I have done allot of study with written materials and OJT, but it did help me pass the written. I'm not sure I could quantify how much, although one question could be the difference between passing and failing. My feeling is that $30.00 is cheaper that paying $200.00 twice. -Original Message- From: Bond Jeffrey MSgt 93 CSS/SCON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 9:19 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Boson CCIE Written Practice test Can anyone whose has passed the CCIE written commit on whether the Boson test helped you passed the 350-001? thanks Jeff _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: token ring question
NOT IN THIS LIFE TIME Even if you plug two 2500 into the same MAU, the MAU cannot be divided, it's basically too dumb. Even if you don't use IP, the MAU will see both ring addresses on the same segment, which will create a problem. You will have to have a Smart Device, that is the only way you will get away with plugging two routers into the same TokenRing device. Madge makes one, but it's a switch not a MAU, a SmartRing Switch to be exact. -Original Message- From: Frank Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: token ring question Try it. From: Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:34:34 -0600 (CST) Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade Cisco 2610
Carmelo Garofalo wrote: sorry , I would want to write, if i can replace the WIC Serial (Sync/Async), with speed up to 128kb, with the WIC-2T interface. Yes, but keep in mind that you cannot connect async line to WIC-2T. In conclusion, is it possibile do I have a router with two WIC-2T in slots? Sure. No problems. Saa _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing protocol
You can redistribute static routes, which protocol do static routes use Duck - Original Message - From: lawrence sculark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 3:08 PM Subject: Re: Routing protocol look up "redistribution"..it will set you on the right path...lawrence From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Routing protocol Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:28:38 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBBD3226D000AD820F3D2D020AF4E054A24; Wed Nov 08 14:47:10 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA03962;Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:43:24 -0500 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:22 -0500 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA01319GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:21 -0500 Received: from smtprelay3.abs.adelphia.net (smtprelay.abs.adelphia.net [64.8.20.11])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA01291GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:20 -0500 Received: from duck1 ([24.48.157.224]) by smtprelay3.abs.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id G3Q99500.J4L; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:31:53 -0500 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 08 14:48:01 2000 Message-ID: 02c801c04ab5$8f85f1f0$[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk I don't think this make sense. Routing protocols are used to maintain routing tables. Routed protocols are used for addressing and accessing stations on a network. The process of routing is the ability of a router being able to receive a packet, check the destination in the packet, look for a destination network in the route table and switch the packet to the appropriate interface that can reach the destination network. So routing is the process of: 1. declaring a destination 2. finding the destinaton 3. switching the packet to an interface on the path to the destination. Many protocols are involved in this process from ARP to BGP or anything in between. Duck AVI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other protocols Is it EIGRP or BGP Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade Cisco 2610
carmelo Garofalo wrote: With this architecture Can I repalce the WIC Low Speed Serial with the other WIC Serial (Sync/Async) at 2 Mbit? There's no WIC sync/async for 2 Mbps. But, WIC-2T (two port, 2 Mbps SYNC serial) with do the job. Saa _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help for study purpose
I am new to cisco and just started reading for the CCNA Exam. I am having one 2501 CISCO Router and I will like to make use of the aux port connected to a modem to dial to the internet. I tried to configure the aux line usin "line aux 0" but was unable to configure PPP with this interface. My IOS Ver is 11.0. Any hint on how to do this shall be higly appreciated. Francis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade Cisco 2600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Carmelo If you are using both serials. Are they in the expansion slot or in the WAN slots. If you have a spare WAN slot you could use a WIC 2 T to give you 2 high speed ports. How have you got the 4 ISDN ports into the router ? He got it with 4 port ISDN-BRI network module (NM-4B-...) NM-4B-S/T4-Port ISDN-BRI Network Module NM-4B-S/T= 4-Port ISDN-BRI Network Module NM-4B-U 4-Port ISDN-BRI with NT-1 Network Module NM-4B-U= 4-Port ISDN-BRI with NT-1 Network Module Sasa Dave Carmelo Garofalo [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] a.sas.com cc: Sent by:Subject: Upgrade Cisco 2600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] m 11/09/2000 11:14 Please respond to Carmelo Garofalo Hi Guys, in my site there is a Cisco Router 2610 with the following hardware and software configuration: Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.0(5)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 17-Aug-99 13:11 by cmong ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) roma uptime is 2 weeks, 5 days, 22 hours, 47 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on at 10:44:34 UTC Fri Jan 7 2000 System image file is "flash:c2600-d-mz.120-5.T1" cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x203) with 20480K/4096K bytes of memory . Processor board ... M860 processor: part number 0, mask 49 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 2 Low-speed serial(sync/async) network interface(s) 4 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2102 The WIC ( 2 Serial Sync/Async) are busy for two sites, i must do a new site with a link at 2 Mbit. The configuration hardware ( 2 Low speed serial), of course, don't support the new link. With this architecture Can I repalce the WIC Low Speed Serial with the other WIC Serial (Sync/Async) at 2 Mbit? Regards, Carmelo Carmelo Garofalo System Support SAS Italy +39 (06) 32816650 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAS ... The Power to Know _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: token ring question
yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau. You can't mix ring speeds however. daveh -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why not supernetting?
Just to be argumentative, it is not necessarily true that 500 hosts on a single network / wire will result in a crippled network. As always, it is the usage that will determine the result. I once interviewed with a very large bank. The network team there was required to have extensive protocol analysis expertise because, in the words of the interviewer, we have very large segments, and we want to eliminate problems as son as we hear about them. He told me they had as many as 1200 machines on a subnet! Obviously, in most circumstances, the network folks believed that performance was satisfactory. They did apparently spent a lot of time tracking down misbehaving NIC's :- Cisco's published recommendations about maximum hosts on a subnet / broadcast domain are general recommendations. I suggest that if you have folks doing extensive sharing of Autocad files, or extensive desktop video conferencing, or extensive VoIP, even the Cisco recommendations may be too large for reliable LAN performance. On the other hand, if all you are doing is SNA emulation. 500 may not be bad at all. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Donald B Johnson Jr Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:00 AM To: jeongwoo park; Groupstudy Subject:Re: Why not supernetting? Your problem seems to be insufficient hardware. Supernetting five subnets and putting 500 stations on one segement will cripple your network. Duck - Original Message - From: jeongwoo park [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Groupstudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:13 PM Subject: Why not supernetting? Hi All, I am looking for advice on a LAN performance issue. i am running primarily NT4 and win2K boxes on a 100Mbit UTP Ethernet LAN. my servers are on static IPs on one subnet while my clients pick up DHCP addresses (assigned out of my control) in any one of half a dozen other subnets. file transfer and printing performance between client and server is averaging 1Mbit/sec when computers are in different subnets. switch the same two computers to static IPs in the same subnet and throughput jumps to a respectable 30-70Mbit/sec. i need to keep the clients on DHCP as i don't have enough static IPs to go around for the subnet the servers are in. all clients and servers are attached to one of 5 Allied Telesyn 8126XL 24-port managed switches. all 5 of these "edge" switches connect to another switch of the same model with a 100Mbit multi-mode (1300 nanometer) fiber uplink which connects to a Cisco Catalyst 5500 for our routing needs. When the clients are on different subnets the file transfers appear to take a long trip through the router with a huge performance penalty (1Mbit/sec). when the client and server are on the same subnet the packets do NOT appear to be routed (perhaps they are handled using ARP?) and the performance is very good. ping response times on both switches and routers is under 20ms. This is where I believe supernetting could be a solution to this slowness, because I think supernetting allows me to put all stations in the same subnet, witch avoids routing needs. I got some responses to my previous post from people saying that supernetting would slow down the speed because there would be too many stations in big broadcast domain, which contradicts what I am willing to do. Am i missing some key concepts here that might improve my understanding of this tragic performance? any help would be greatly appreciated. take care, jw __ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Logging Tool
Hi, is there a free tool for generating reports from PIX syslog-output ? Thanks __ DeTeSystem Deutsche Telekom Systemlösungen GmbH Hahnstraße 43 d, 60528 Frankfurt am Main Postfach 71 02 45, 60492 Frankfurt am Main Telefon: (069) 6 65 31 -0, Telefax: (069) 6 65 31 -4 99 Aufsichtsrat: Josef Brauner (Vorsitzender) Geschäftsführung: Christian A. Hufnagl (Vorsitzender), Joseph Eisenried, Peter Ruland, Michael Fritz, Wilfried Peters Eintrag Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main HR B 37649; USt-IdNr. DE 811 575 332 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help for study purpose
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/123/4.html http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/technotes/tech_features.shtml This should be the first place that you look. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12supdoc/dsq cg3/qcpppara.htm Might be useful. Consider buying the BCRAN, Building Cisco Remote Access Networks, book from Cisco Press. -Original Message- From: Francis Kola Eludini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help for study purpose I am new to cisco and just started reading for the CCNA Exam. I am having one 2501 CISCO Router and I will like to make use of the aux port connected to a modem to dial to the internet. I tried to configure the aux line usin "line aux 0" but was unable to configure PPP with this interface. My IOS Ver is 11.0. Any hint on how to o this shall be higly appreciated. Francis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Get Paid To Read Email!
ENOUGH ALREADY! IF I WANTED TO SELL AMWAY, I WOULD BE SUBSCRIBING TO THE AMWAY LIST!! KNOCK IT OFF! PAUL, GET THIS GUY OUT OF HERE!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Get Paid To Read Email! This is awesome! Rajeev KS here! I just had to tell you about SendMoreBullInfo.com! You get paid to read email! They send you information about things you are interested in and they pay you to check it out! Here's the link: http://www.sendmoreinfo.com/id/A**H*** I know you are going to love this web site! Talk to you soon! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: token ring question
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, NP-BASS LEON wrote: NOT IN THIS LIFE TIME Even if you plug two 2500 into the same MAU, the MAU cannot be divided, it's basically too dumb. Even if you don't use IP, the MAU will see both ring addresses on the same segment, which will create a problem. thats what I thought. You will have to have a Smart Device, that is the only way you will get away with plugging two routers into the same TokenRing device. Madge makes one, but it's a switch not a MAU, a SmartRing Switch to be exact. nod, thanks for confirming. Brian -Original Message- From: Frank Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: token ring question Try it. From: Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:34:34 -0600 (CST) Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: token ring question
HOW I would really like to know this one. If I heard it correct Brian mentioned that he had a dumb MAU, so that MAU looks at that entire box as being one network segment, so how do you place two router interfaces with two different IP or IPX addresses on the same segment??? IP will detect the conflict and IPX will beacon. -Original Message- From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:03 PM To: 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau. You can't mix ring speeds however. daveh -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4 books for $6 - check it out.
I was a member of this club and I think it was a pretty good deal. You only had to buy one or two more books at regular club prices and then your obligation was over. Also, every time you signed someone up under you they got the discounted books and they you could pick up to $120 or 3 books for free (minus SH). Their prices are cheaper than most on-line book stores, you don't need a credit card to pay or sign-up. They are slow (3-4 weeks) when delivering, but I think it's worth it for the price you pay for the books. As far as the monthly book card that comes, you can decline the book on the website and you can actually decline 3-4 months in advance. I'm not a member anymore, since it has been awhile since I ordered a book, but for someone who wants to start building a library then this is a good way to start without making a significant investment. In my particular case I received around 15 books for the $9.99 you pay for the initial set, and then buy getting some friends to sign up. I bough a couple of books at member prices and then I was finished, and SH wasn't that bad. If I remember correctly SH was usually less than $20 for 2-3 books. Now you add that to the $9.99 you paid and you couldn't get one of those books for that price. Just my $.02. Hope this clarifies some of it for everyone. Eric -Original Message- From: Nodir Nazarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 10:40 AM To: Carl Mirsky Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 4 books for $6 - check it out. Well, like in any club ;) Since I buy about 1-2 computer book a month anyway, I found it as a good deal. You're right, if you don't plan to get books later on - it's just not worth it. Terms Conditions don't specify how long you are obligated to be in the "club".. Thanks for comments ! Nodir On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Carl Mirsky wrote: Here is the catch. Basically you will get a book in the mail every so often, and get billed for it including S/H. I had joined a CD club a couple of years back with the "free" CD's. Well, the S/H was billed for EACH CD and was almost as much as the CD's would have cost me in the store, and they will keep coming. You will need to notify them EACH AND EVERY TIME that you don't want their "featured selection". Is it a good deal? Maybe. Depends on how much you think you will be saving. I can guarantee you that their "featured selection" will most likely not be what you are interested in. IMNSHO. How does the club work? You'll receive our free club magazine about every 3 weeks, up to 18 times a year, featuring a Main Selection for the club along with a dated reply card. Choose from the current Main and Alternate Selections, or from a selection of recently offered titles. NOTE:-- If you want the Main Selection, do nothing, and it will be sent to you automatically. If you prefer another selection, or no book at all, simply indicate your choice on the dated reply card included in the Announcement and return it by the date specified. You can do it through the mail, or right here, online! A shipping-and-handling charge (and sales tax, where applicable) is added to each shipment. --: END NOTE Carl Mirsky CCNP, MCSE, SCSA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nodir Nazarov Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4 books for $6 - check it out. hello everyone ! Couldn't help - visit this site: you can get 3 books for 6 bucks and 1 additional for free. I still don't know what the catch is, but you can get CCIE/CCDP study guides too. 4 decent study guides for 6 bucks - why not ?? I ordered (didn't get yet). http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?62204 note: I am no affiliated with zdnet at all. Nodir _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why not supernetting?
I second your arguments, Chuck. I worked on a scenario with varying subnet sizes due to some inherent limitations on how robots PLC's work (no default gateways). I had subnets of size 1024 with 500 machines on each subnet. PC traffic is difficult to predict because of human users but machines are predictible. Habeeb -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:47 AM To: Donald B Johnson Jr; jeongwoo park; Groupstudy Subject: RE: Why not supernetting? Just to be argumentative, it is not necessarily true that 500 hosts on a single network / wire will result in a crippled network. As always, it is the usage that will determine the result. I once interviewed with a very large bank. The network team there was required to have extensive protocol analysis expertise because, in the words of the interviewer, we have very large segments, and we want to eliminate problems as son as we hear about them. He told me they had as many as 1200 machines on a subnet! Obviously, in most circumstances, the network folks believed that performance was satisfactory. They did apparently spent a lot of time tracking down misbehaving NIC's :- Cisco's published recommendations about maximum hosts on a subnet / broadcast domain are general recommendations. I suggest that if you have folks doing extensive sharing of Autocad files, or extensive desktop video conferencing, or extensive VoIP, even the Cisco recommendations may be too large for reliable LAN performance. On the other hand, if all you are doing is SNA emulation. 500 may not be bad at all. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Donald B Johnson Jr Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:00 AM To: jeongwoo park; Groupstudy Subject: Re: Why not supernetting? Your problem seems to be insufficient hardware. Supernetting five subnets and putting 500 stations on one segement will cripple your network. Duck - Original Message - From: jeongwoo park [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Groupstudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:13 PM Subject: Why not supernetting? Hi All, I am looking for advice on a LAN performance issue. i am running primarily NT4 and win2K boxes on a 100Mbit UTP Ethernet LAN. my servers are on static IPs on one subnet while my clients pick up DHCP addresses (assigned out of my control) in any one of half a dozen other subnets. file transfer and printing performance between client and server is averaging 1Mbit/sec when computers are in different subnets. switch the same two computers to static IPs in the same subnet and throughput jumps to a respectable 30-70Mbit/sec. i need to keep the clients on DHCP as i don't have enough static IPs to go around for the subnet the servers are in. all clients and servers are attached to one of 5 Allied Telesyn 8126XL 24-port managed switches. all 5 of these "edge" switches connect to another switch of the same model with a 100Mbit multi-mode (1300 nanometer) fiber uplink which connects to a Cisco Catalyst 5500 for our routing needs. When the clients are on different subnets the file transfers appear to take a long trip through the router with a huge performance penalty (1Mbit/sec). when the client and server are on the same subnet the packets do NOT appear to be routed (perhaps they are handled using ARP?) and the performance is very good. ping response times on both switches and routers is under 20ms. This is where I believe supernetting could be a solution to this slowness, because I think supernetting allows me to put all stations in the same subnet, witch avoids routing needs. I got some responses to my previous post from people saying that supernetting would slow down the speed because there would be too many stations in big broadcast domain, which contradicts what I am willing to do. Am i missing some key concepts here that might improve my understanding of this tragic performance? any help would be greatly appreciated. take care, jw __ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list
RE: token ring question
I have seen two ip ranges running on a single IBM 8228 mau (you can't get much dumber than that), and I have seen two IP ranges running on a single dumb ethernet hub. The secondary address command allows you to do that with one interface. As far as IPX, I'm not as familiar with that but I don't see why it would be different. What you will see if you do a debug is lots of messages about things arping on the wrong subnet, but things will work. The original post said multiple rings, which is maybe where I'm going wrong with regard to bridging. But if you have two router interfaces with different network addresses and put them into different bridge groups why would that be a problem. daveh -Original Message- From: NP-BASS LEON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:43 PM To: 'Hennen, David'; 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question HOW I would really like to know this one. If I heard it correct Brian mentioned that he had a dumb MAU, so that MAU looks at that entire box as being one network segment, so how do you place two router interfaces with two different IP or IPX addresses on the same segment??? IP will detect the conflict and IPX will beacon. -Original Message- From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:03 PM To: 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau. You can't mix ring speeds however. daveh -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4 books for $6 - check it out.
Thanks for the clarification. Carl Mirsky CCNP, MCSE, SCSA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McMasters,Eric Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:04 PM To: 'Nodir Nazarov'; Carl Mirsky Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 4 books for $6 - check it out. I was a member of this club and I think it was a pretty good deal. You only had to buy one or two more books at regular club prices and then your obligation was over. Also, every time you signed someone up under you they got the discounted books and they you could pick up to $120 or 3 books for free (minus SH). Their prices are cheaper than most on-line book stores, you don't need a credit card to pay or sign-up. They are slow (3-4 weeks) when delivering, but I think it's worth it for the price you pay for the books. As far as the monthly book card that comes, you can decline the book on the website and you can actually decline 3-4 months in advance. I'm not a member anymore, since it has been awhile since I ordered a book, but for someone who wants to start building a library then this is a good way to start without making a significant investment. In my particular case I received around 15 books for the $9.99 you pay for the initial set, and then buy getting some friends to sign up. I bough a couple of books at member prices and then I was finished, and SH wasn't that bad. If I remember correctly SH was usually less than $20 for 2-3 books. Now you add that to the $9.99 you paid and you couldn't get one of those books for that price. Just my $.02. Hope this clarifies some of it for everyone. Eric -Original Message- From: Nodir Nazarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 10:40 AM To: Carl Mirsky Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 4 books for $6 - check it out. Well, like in any club ;) Since I buy about 1-2 computer book a month anyway, I found it as a good deal. You're right, if you don't plan to get books later on - it's just not worth it. Terms Conditions don't specify how long you are obligated to be in the "club".. Thanks for comments ! Nodir On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Carl Mirsky wrote: Here is the catch. Basically you will get a book in the mail every so often, and get billed for it including S/H. I had joined a CD club a couple of years back with the "free" CD's. Well, the S/H was billed for EACH CD and was almost as much as the CD's would have cost me in the store, and they will keep coming. You will need to notify them EACH AND EVERY TIME that you don't want their "featured selection". Is it a good deal? Maybe. Depends on how much you think you will be saving. I can guarantee you that their "featured selection" will most likely not be what you are interested in. IMNSHO. How does the club work? You'll receive our free club magazine about every 3 weeks, up to 18 times a year, featuring a Main Selection for the club along with a dated reply card. Choose from the current Main and Alternate Selections, or from a selection of recently offered titles. NOTE:-- If you want the Main Selection, do nothing, and it will be sent to you automatically. If you prefer another selection, or no book at all, simply indicate your choice on the dated reply card included in the Announcement and return it by the date specified. You can do it through the mail, or right here, online! A shipping-and-handling charge (and sales tax, where applicable) is added to each shipment. --: END NOTE Carl Mirsky CCNP, MCSE, SCSA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nodir Nazarov Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4 books for $6 - check it out. hello everyone ! Couldn't help - visit this site: you can get 3 books for 6 bucks and 1 additional for free. I still don't know what the catch is, but you can get CCIE/CCDP study guides too. 4 decent study guides for 6 bucks - why not ?? I ordered (didn't get yet). http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?62204 note: I am no affiliated with zdnet at all. Nodir _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Area virtual links
When creating a virtual link between an ABR non-directly connected are to an ABR in the backbone should you always use the loopback address for the virtual link. Doyle does this on page 943 of his Routing TCP/IP book. Secondly is there a route to the loopback of these two routers. Maybe I'm forgetting something but how do the two routers find routes to each other if you're not advertising L0 and there is no static routes to the L0. Thanks, Keith _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MCNS 1.0 2.0
Don't know if this has been asked already Is there a difference between the 1.0 and the 2.0 exam I am currently studying for theMCNS 2.0 exam and am using the test objectives that are from the 1.0 exam I wonder if this is accurate. I know there isn't an exam objective for the MCNS 2.0 or maybe someone found it... I would appreciate any help on this Thanks. Alfred p.s. someone mentioned before that the CCIE security recert exam objective would be a good guide to follow for the mcns exam.. any thoughts? thanks again.
Re: Help for study purpose
Dr, My first suggestion would be to upgrade the code on your router so that you're running a newer code than 11.0. You'll find that ppp debugs are a lot easier to read in 11.3 and higher, and that you have a lot more functionality available to you. The configuration of a modem on the AUX port isn't too difficult, and you shouldn't have too much of a problem if you have the cabling right, a good modem (my preference is USR Sportster), and the correct configuration. Configure the modem with an appropriate initialization string (get this from the modem manufacturer) using the everse telnet procedure s outlined here; http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/76/9.html The line aux 0 is the physical port, and will not take any ppp commands. The logical configuration goes on the logical interface (async interface) which you will ned to create. To create an async interface that corresponds to the AUX port, type in 'show line' at the exec prompt. The number that precedes the word AUX in this output is what you use for the async interface. So for example, if that number is "1", your configuration would look somehing like this: ! hostname Router enable pasword cisco ! chat-script test "" "atdt\T" TIMEOUT 60 CONNECT \c ! Interface async 1 ip address negotiated encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer-group 1 dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer string 5123245 async default routing async mode interactive ppp authenication chap pap callin ppp chap hostname MyUsername ppp chap password MyPassword ppp pap sent-username MyUsername password Mypassword ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line aux 0 modem inout flowcontrol harware transport input all speed 115200 script dialer test ! You can find lots of information on this and other configs on CCO if you know your way around it.A good place to start is the Dial Access Configuration Cookbook http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/index.html Good luck on your CCNA!! Michael A From: "Dr. Francis Kola Eludini" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Dr. Francis Kola Eludini" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help for study purpose Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:20:54 +0200 I am new to cisco and just started reading for the CCNA Exam. I am having one 2501 CISCO Router and I will like to make use of the aux port connected to a modem to dial to the internet. I tried to configure the aux line usin "line aux 0" but was unable to configure PPP with this interface. My IOS Ver is 11.0. Any hint on how to do this shall be higly appreciated. Francis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anybody else take the CCIE Security beta test?
There have been at least two reports on group study over the last couple of weeks. I wrote one of them. Rodgers Moore wrote another. You should be able to find them in the recent archives. Both of us agreed that the blueprint Cisco published on CCO is very accurate. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arthur Stewart Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Anybody else take the CCIE Security beta test? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Help
I am using a static mapping on the pix for an inside illegal address to an outside legal address. I want to allow the inside machine to be pinged from the outside as well as allow http traffic to that machine. Lets say the inside address is 10.1.1.5 and the internet legal address is 45.33.20.5 This is what I did: static (inside, outside) 45.33.20.5 10.1.1.5 conduit permit icmp host 45.33.20.5 any conduit permit tcp host 45.33.20.5 eq www any I cannot ping the inside machine from the internet with this config. Please help. Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WIC 2T module question
Do the WIC 1T and 2T modular cards for the 2600/3600 routers have db 60 sync/async ports just like a 2500 series router? _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: token ring question
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Mask Of Zorro wrote: OK - that's one issue... BUT there is still the original question which had to do with connecting two routers to the MAU and doing some bridging between them. In the previous scenario, we "virtualized" the network by using addressing at layer 3. This split one layer 2 network into two layer 3 networks. The router was used to connect the "virtual" networks together. nod, what I had asked was about "multiple rings", like you say, in a bridging scenerio, which doesn't sound possible on one MAU. I think some people on this list got confused because they are confusing network segments (layer 3) with a ring which is layer 2. Brian Z From: NP-BASS LEON [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: NP-BASS LEON [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Hennen, David'" [EMAIL PROTECTED],"'Brian'" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:42:38 -0500 HOW I would really like to know this one. If I heard it correct Brian mentioned that he had a dumb MAU, so that MAU looks at that entire box as being one network segment, so how do you place two router interfaces with two different IP or IPX addresses on the same segment??? IP will detect the conflict and IPX will beacon. -Original Message- From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:03 PM To: 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau. You can't mix ring speeds however. daveh -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN Backup
Hi, I'm having some issues with ISDN backup failover and hopefully someone has done this before. -Central site with a dedicated T1 through serial int. to Remote site router -Central site also has a ISDN to Remote site to a second router The Central serial has the BRI as a backup. Also, we are NOT using RIP (although this is not out of the question) When we pull the T1 the ISDN comes up and everything seems fine. But when the T1 is put back, there are very weird things happening. I'm pretty sure its routing, so I've include the route commands of each router. Any thoughts, ideas, suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Chris Central Router 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.10 ---This route goes to the internet ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 123.123.123.1 -- This goes to the Remote site through the T1 router ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer1 50 -- This goes to Remote site through ISDN router Remote Site T1 Router ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 123.123.123.2 - Goes to Central T1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 50 - Goes to Central through Remote ISDN (192.168.1.2 is LAN side of ISDN router) Remote site ISDN Router ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 - 2.1 is ethernet side of Central router (ipunnumbered over ISDN) Hope this is clear enough. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help for study purpose
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, michael owuor wrote: Dr, My first suggestion would be to upgrade the code on your router so that you're running a newer code than 11.0. You'll find that ppp debugs are a lot easier to read in 11.3 and higher, and that you have a lot more functionality available to you. And if you're limited to 8MB of flash and want to do Enterprise, look at 11.2(24)P which fits the bill and is an Early Deployment (feature rich) release with relativley few caveats. Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Area virtual links
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Keith Townsend wrote: When creating a virtual link between an ABR non-directly connected are to an ABR in the backbone should you always use the loopback address for the virtual link. Doyle does this on page 943 of his Routing TCP/IP book. loopbacks are always good to use for terminating things like that. Secondly is there a route to the loopback of these two routers. Maybe I'm forgetting something but how do the two routers find routes to each other if you're not advertising L0 and there is no static routes to the L0. you would of course need to advertise the l0 via a routing protocol, or like you say, make static routes. Brian Thanks, Keith _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Area virtual links
The connection is actually from OSPF router ID ( RID ) to router i.d. In the case of Doyle, his example is so nicely numbered that the RIDs and the loopback addresses are the same. ;- I am guessing that this is one of the gotcha's that evil lab proctors might throw into the break-fix, or maybe one of the gotcha's that may cause the loss of points in the early phases of the lab. In the CCIE Lab prep advice I have been circulating www.chuck.to/CCIEAdvice.txt ) two different CCIE's mention the value of preparing a solid IP addressing scheme prior to beginning lab configuration. One of them warns about issues like changing RID's when routers are reloaded during the lab ( and in real life too :- ) Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Townsend Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:OSPF Area virtual links When creating a virtual link between an ABR non-directly connected are to an ABR in the backbone should you always use the loopback address for the virtual link. Doyle does this on page 943 of his Routing TCP/IP book. Secondly is there a route to the loopback of these two routers. Maybe I'm forgetting something but how do the two routers find routes to each other if you're not advertising L0 and there is no static routes to the L0. Thanks, Keith _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Area virtual links
Keith, Generally the router being used to connect you to area 0 will be on the same subnet. Therefore no routing issues. As far as loopback you have to use the router ID as the IP address of the router so if you are using a loopback address to be the router ID that would explain it. Cory -Original Message- From: Keith Townsend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF Area virtual links When creating a virtual link between an ABR non-directly connected are to an ABR in the backbone should you always use the loopback address for the virtual link. Doyle does this on page 943 of his Routing TCP/IP book. Secondly is there a route to the loopback of these two routers. Maybe I'm forgetting something but how do the two routers find routes to each other if you're not advertising L0 and there is no static routes to the L0. Thanks, Keith _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: token ring question
IPX doesn't beacon... Beaconing is a Token RIng function that happens at layer 2. IPX happens at layer 3. This is a simple case of OSI confusion (as opposed to OSI envy, which we won't get into...). Token Ring is Layer 2. IP and IPX are layer 3. The Token Ring MAU is part of that Layer 2 ring. At layer 2, with one MAU you have only one ring. BUT - at layer 3, you can run multiple network segments on that same ring. They won't be able to see each other unless you have a router that has an interface configured on each one. For example, take an 8-port 8228 MAU and connect 4 PC's to it. Configure each PC with TCP/IP. Configure 2 of them to use IP addresses 10.10.10.1/24 and 10.10.10.2/24 respectively (and respectfully...). Configure the other 2 PC's to use IP addresses 192.168.16.1/24 and 192.168.16.2/24. MAKE SURE ALL 4 PC's are configured for the same speed (4 or 16). Guess what happens - the 192.168.16.x stations can ping each other, but can't ping the 10.10.10.x's. Likewise, the 10.10.10.x's can ping each other, but not the 192.168.16.x's. NOW - connect a router with 2 TR interfaces to the MAU. Assign one interface to 10.10.10.3/24 and one to 192.168.16.3/24 - again make sure they are both set to the same speed as the PC's. Look at the router's routing table - both networks appear as they are both directly connected. You'll note that the 10.10.10.x's can now ping the 192.168.16.x's and vice versa. OK - that's one issue... BUT there is still the original question which had to do with connecting two routers to the MAU and doing some bridging between them. In the previous scenario, we "virtualized" the network by using addressing at layer 3. This split one layer 2 network into two layer 3 networks. The router was used to connect the "virtual" networks together. In a bridging scenario, we want to connect networks together at layer 2 to "simulate" one larger layer 2 network. Do we have two layer 2 networks? No. Can we use routers to "virtualize" the layer two network, split it in two, then use bridging on the routers to connect it back again? Hmmm... I've held you hand this far - now y'all walk a bit on your own... Z From: NP-BASS LEON [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: NP-BASS LEON [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Hennen, David'" [EMAIL PROTECTED],"'Brian'" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:42:38 -0500 HOW I would really like to know this one. If I heard it correct Brian mentioned that he had a dumb MAU, so that MAU looks at that entire box as being one network segment, so how do you place two router interfaces with two different IP or IPX addresses on the same segment??? IP will detect the conflict and IPX will beacon. -Original Message- From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:03 PM To: 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau. You can't mix ring speeds however. daveh -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Subject
_ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Help
Make sure the translation is in the xlate table ( sh xlate ). If not ping out from the inside host then check it again. Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Help I am using a static mapping on the pix for an inside illegal address to an outside legal address. I want to allow the inside machine to be pinged from the outside as well as allow http traffic to that machine. Lets say the inside address is 10.1.1.5 and the internet legal address is 45.33.20.5 This is what I did: static (inside, outside) 45.33.20.5 10.1.1.5 conduit permit icmp host 45.33.20.5 any conduit permit tcp host 45.33.20.5 eq www any I cannot ping the inside machine from the internet with this config. Please help. Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WIC 2T module question
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Frank Wells wrote: Do the WIC 1T and 2T modular cards for the 2600/3600 routers have db 60 sync/async ports just like a 2500 series router? yes _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey ... its the Thursday follies of ...'How quick can I purge that groupstudy message listing'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I guess the message title tells it all ... you can take it that 'some' ain't too happy when the gremlins do clean up with these messages at groupstudy. Arrggghhh!! Paul B. ... appreciate the thoughtfulnes but is it possible to keep the retention longer than one weeks worth prior to your cleanup(automated or not)!! (I know ... the archives ... sorry .. this puppy had enough of www surfing!) Just my two cents! grumble grumble Kirby -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBOKcQw7HZxLjukiixEQLIiQCeMTIluw6uobv3BZknfhhfO+hS+OYAoIzA FgffCHprKU1jIgFl8Q6mQxj4 =9Lr6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CID or Core Tests?
CID isn't much like DCN. CID expects advanced technology expertise, especially in legacy protocols. CID does not have any case studies and only a few "methodology" questions. It mostly has strangely-worded questions about Cisco solutions to problems network engineers face when growing and enhancing enterprise networks. Bottom line: I think it would be hard to pass CID if you don't have the knowledge to pass the other core CCDP tests. Also, if you wait on CID, maybe you'll be able to take a test that isn't ancient. I haven't heard that Cisco is updating CID, but I would think that they must be. Priscilla At 10:04 PM 11/8/00, Mike McDaniel wrote: I have been a fly on the wall for some time. I have been able to find the answers to most of my questions from the archives or current threads, but this one has me stumped. I have had my CCNA for about a year and just recently passed the DCN test. keeping in mind I wish to complete CCNP/DP certifications, my questions is as follows. Should I sit the CID test and get that out of the way while the DCN info is fresh, or should I take the core tests to prepare for the CID? I'm leaning towards CID, but would like feedback from those who have been there. TIA, Mike _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSCN book
I am a little behind in reading, but like www.mysimin.com to find stuff cheap. Brian On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Jeff Duchin wrote: Do you guys know where I can get this for lower than the retail price? If I go through my work I get a discount but it takes too damn long... I'm taking a trip next week and want it sooner. Any suggestions? Cheers, Jeff _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Colt test
If you pass the Colt test you should pass the real thing no problem, the boson tests are not as difficult but cover more of the area that the exams are actually based on. rgs peter. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need Advise - Cisco AVVID
Title: In need of Sr. Networking Engineer Mohan, What specifically are you looking for as far as info/help/etc? I have quite a bit of experience with the AVVID products. I am involved in a large centralized, multi-tenant Cisco Call Manager 3.0 project using a myriad of gateways, conference bridges, etc. We primarily use the Cisco 7960 IP Phones but have also used the older Cisco VIP30 and 12SP phones. I'd be glad to assist with whatever info I can provide. I'd have to agree that Cisco's docs on the AVVID products are a bit thin. tim Tim Medley - CCNA/CCDA Network Architect Voice Engineering iReadyWorld 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-525-9119 - Faz 877-6iReady - 24/7 Helpdesk -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MohanSent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 10:48 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: Need Advise - Cisco AVVID Dear all, has anyone successfully implemented Cisco AVVID, appreciate if you could share your experience and share some of the problem you encountered... need some info. on the following, cisco web-site has lots of Cisco AVVID marketing doc. but not so much of configuration and tips. Any doc. on configuring IVR function on Cisco voice digital gateway (3640) and Cisco dial-out utility... many thanks, mohan
RE: WIC 2T module question
the WIC-2T has two little tiny ports called smart serial ports. The WIC-1T has a regular db60 like on a 2500, I don't think they could fit two of those on a WIC daveh -Original Message- From: Frank Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 2:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WIC 2T module question Do the WIC 1T and 2T modular cards for the 2600/3600 routers have db 60 sync/async ports just like a 2500 series router? _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN and VOICE cables for back to back connectivity
In the US we can test FXS voice ports easily. At just about any supermarket we can buy analog phones for less than $20 US. That's all it takes. I would guess that you can get analog phones for pretty cheap there too? I don't think you can easily simulate ISDN, though, but check the archives for an answer. ISDN simulators were discussed just recently. Good luck. Priscilla At 04:19 AM 11/9/00, Ravi Kumar wrote: hi friends I am Ravi Kumar from Hyderabad, INDIA. I have 2* 2610 routers with 2 port sync/async card, 1 port ISDN BRI card and 2 port FXS card installed in VM. I am using these routers exclusively for my CCNP 2.0 training and preparation. I have DTE and DCE cables for two routers back to back connectivity to simulate leased lines. are there any cables with which I can simulate ISDN connectivity as well as VoIP connectivity?? your help is highly apreciated in advance. with regards ravi kumar B. Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Backup
Chris, What are the specific problems you are seeing the T1 comes back up? The only routing issues I would look for would be to make sure you have recursive routing configured wherever you have IP unnumbered configured. Either that, or I would get rid of ip unnumbered alltogether since this is a private network, and there is no risk of running out of IP address space. Does the ISDN router have a recursive host route to the 2.1 address which says it is reachable through the BRI/dialer? I think the easiest/cleanest way to do his would be to run the routing protocol, and have the Remote ISDN router do the dialing when needed. Have the Central router advertise a default route to the Remote T1 router, which would also have the floating default route pointing to the ISDN Router. When the T1 connection is lost, the floating static route is installed, and traffic is directed to the ISDN router which only needs a static default route going out its BRI. Since the remote routers share a LAN segment, you could also look into implementing HSRP where the Remote T1 router is confiured as the active router, and therefore receives all traffic from the LAN users who need to get to the Central site. If that router fails, or if the T1 interface goes down, the ISDN router now becomes the active router and receives the traffic from the LAN users and sends it out the ISDN interface. A combination of floating static routes with a dynamic rouing protocol and HSRP is a good design to go with, since you achive redundancy on layer 1, 2 and 3. Floating statics with a routing protocol ensure the Remote T1 router is notified when, for example, the T1 interface on the central site goes down. In such a case, the T1 interface on the Remote could stay up and floating statics alone would not notify the Remote T1 router of the loss of connection. The dynamic routing protocol will. HSRP allows the ISDN router to be notified when the T1 interface or the ethernet interface on the Remote T1 router goes down, or when the entire router fails. michael a.o From: "Chris Sees" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Chris Sees" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN Backup Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 14:21:21 -0500 Hi, I'm having some issues with ISDN backup failover and hopefully someone has done this before. -Central site with a dedicated T1 through serial int. to Remote site router -Central site also has a ISDN to Remote site to a second router The Central serial has the BRI as a backup. Also, we are NOT using RIP (although this is not out of the question) When we pull the T1 the ISDN comes up and everything seems fine. But when the T1 is put back, there are very weird things happening. I'm pretty sure its routing, so I've include the route commands of each router. Any thoughts, ideas, suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Chris Central Router 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.10 ---This route goes to the internet ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 123.123.123.1 -- This goes to the Remote site through the T1 router ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer1 50 -- This goes to Remote site through ISDN router Remote Site T1 Router ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 123.123.123.2 - Goes to Central T1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 50 - Goes to Central through Remote ISDN (192.168.1.2 is LAN side of ISDN router) Remote site ISDN Router ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 - 2.1 is ethernet side of Central router (ipunnumbered over ISDN) Hope this is clear enough. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colt test for BCMSN
Has any one tried Colt BCMSNe exam on cisco site? Is it harder than real test? How is it compare to Boson or real exam ? Is boson exams any good for BCMSN ? Thanks everyone in advance. Inamul _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX Help
Not working .. it is translated ... ""Plambeck, Todd"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 616662531243D411887000805F65999503C341@HTSCORPPDC">news:616662531243D411887000805F65999503C341@HTSCORPPDC... Make sure the translation is in the xlate table ( sh xlate ). If not ping out from the inside host then check it again. Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Help I am using a static mapping on the pix for an inside illegal address to an outside legal address. I want to allow the inside machine to be pinged from the outside as well as allow http traffic to that machine. Lets say the inside address is 10.1.1.5 and the internet legal address is 45.33.20.5 This is what I did: static (inside, outside) 45.33.20.5 10.1.1.5 conduit permit icmp host 45.33.20.5 any conduit permit tcp host 45.33.20.5 eq www any I cannot ping the inside machine from the internet with this config. Please help. Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: token ring question
The initial question did not mention secondary addresses. They simply stated that they wanted to place TWO seperate routers, with TWO different IP subnets. David, If you could explain how you configured that please let me in on it Thanks in advance. P.S Always looking for new GURU tricks of the trade. -Original Message- From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:56 PM To: NP-BASS LEON; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question I have seen two ip ranges running on a single IBM 8228 mau (you can't get much dumber than that), and I have seen two IP ranges running on a single dumb ethernet hub. The secondary address command allows you to do that with one interface. As far as IPX, I'm not as familiar with that but I don't see why it would be different. What you will see if you do a debug is lots of messages about things arping on the wrong subnet, but things will work. The original post said multiple rings, which is maybe where I'm going wrong with regard to bridging. But if you have two router interfaces with different network addresses and put them into different bridge groups why would that be a problem. daveh -Original Message- From: NP-BASS LEON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:43 PM To: 'Hennen, David'; 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question HOW I would really like to know this one. If I heard it correct Brian mentioned that he had a dumb MAU, so that MAU looks at that entire box as being one network segment, so how do you place two router interfaces with two different IP or IPX addresses on the same segment??? IP will detect the conflict and IPX will beacon. -Original Message- From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:03 PM To: 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau. You can't mix ring speeds however. daveh -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WIC 2T module question
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Bill Sucevic wrote: Actually, the WIC-1T has a DB60, and the WIC-2T has an SS (Super Serial) connector. thats right.I was thinking of an nm2w with 2 wic1t's At 01:55 PM 11/9/00 -0600, Brian wrote: On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Frank Wells wrote: Do the WIC 1T and 2T modular cards for the 2600/3600 routers have db 60 sync/async ports just like a 2500 series router? yes _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CID or Core Tests?
Actually the CID 4.0 course is about to debut in web based/e-learning format. The courseware should come out fairly soon after that. I was actually communicating with the Product Manager for the CID course and was going to sit in the beta class, but it was cancelled as their focus had changed to the web format. I'd suppose that the CID 4.0 exam would be developed a few months after the course is developed. --Mike -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Mike McDaniel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/9/00 12:28 PM Subject: Re: CID or Core Tests? CID isn't much like DCN. CID expects advanced technology expertise, especially in legacy protocols. CID does not have any case studies and only a few "methodology" questions. It mostly has strangely-worded questions about Cisco solutions to problems network engineers face when growing and enhancing enterprise networks. Bottom line: I think it would be hard to pass CID if you don't have the knowledge to pass the other core CCDP tests. Also, if you wait on CID, maybe you'll be able to take a test that isn't ancient. I haven't heard that Cisco is updating CID, but I would think that they must be. Priscilla At 10:04 PM 11/8/00, Mike McDaniel wrote: I have been a fly on the wall for some time. I have been able to find the answers to most of my questions from the archives or current threads, but this one has me stumped. I have had my CCNA for about a year and just recently passed the DCN test. keeping in mind I wish to complete CCNP/DP certifications, my questions is as follows. Should I sit the CID test and get that out of the way while the DCN info is fresh, or should I take the core tests to prepare for the CID? I'm leaning towards CID, but would like feedback from those who have been there. TIA, Mike _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: token ring question
At 01:42 PM 11/9/00, NP-BASS LEON wrote: HOW I would really like to know this one. If I heard it correct Brian mentioned that he had a dumb MAU, so that MAU looks at that entire box as being one network segment, so how do you place two router interfaces with two different IP or IPX addresses on the same segment??? IP will detect the conflict and IPX will beacon. IPX can't beacon!!! ;-) I don't know how we managed to move up to the network layer anyway. The question was "Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU?" The answer is no. A MAU is a physical-layer relay. It's like an Ethernet hub. Two rings requires at least a bridge or switch. To be honest, I don't know what would actually happen if you plugged two 2500s into the same MAU and assigned two different ring numbers. I can't think of anything in the Token Ring protocols that addresses this problem. But I do know that it would be illogical, illegal, and downright ugly, kind of like what's going on in Florida. ;-) Priscilla -Original Message- From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 1:03 PM To: 'Brian'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: token ring question yes you can, as far as having two IP or IPX ranges running on a single mau. You can't mix ring speeds however. daveh -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: token ring question Can you configure multiple rings on a single MAU? I mean If I plug 2 2502's into a MAU can I set different rings for them, or do you really need two MAU's to do multi-ring/bridging scenerios? Brian --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
