Ip default route
Hello It might sound trivial, but can anyone explain the difference between: ip default-gateway 10.0.1.1 and ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.1.1 Thanks Birsen Ozturk _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ip default gateway
Hello I just had a situation like this: I connected a Cisco1750 to Catalist2924, and then Catalist2924 to Catalist8540 and configured "ip default-gateway 10.0.1.1" in 1750(10.0.1.1 is the ip of 8540). Then 1750 was ping'in only 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.240's hosts and no other network in my backbone. Then I turned "ip default gateway 10.0.1.1" into "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.1.1" and my Cisco1750 started pinging every ip in my backbone. I will be grateful if anyone explains why "ip default-gateway" didn't worked and what is the difference between these two. Thanks. Birsen Ozturk _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ccnp routing frames
On the CCNP routing exam is there any questions on (i.e do i have to memorise) frame for frame the format of hello packets,DD packets,LSA packet frames...etc like ..version,type,packet length,route ID,Area ID,Checksum,Au type,Authentication etc etc or is there certain fields i should learn Any help would be useful -Original Message- From: Cisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT/PAT port pass-through Hi all, Im just experimenting with NAT/PAT and want to try to tunnel back to an internal NT server to establish a VPN with it. Say the internal address is 10.1.1.100 I want to pass all traffic from the external IP w.x.y.z(i s0) to internal 10.1.1.100(int e0) for the following ports Protocol ID TCP, Port 1723 Protocol ID 47, port all Can anyone help out with some config pointers? I've got NAT/PAT set up and working. I would like to use PPTP to the router and let the router establish the VPN but I don't think this router will support it. It is running 11.1(c1600-y-l.113-2) Any thoughts? Craig Lindstrom eSage http://www.eSage.com (801) 796-9595 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccnp routing frames
sorry for OSPF -Original Message- From: Robert Nickson Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ccnp routing frames On the CCNP routing exam is there any questions on (i.e do i have to memorise) frame for frame the format of hello packets,DD packets,LSA packet frames...etc like ..version,type,packet length,route ID,Area ID,Checksum,Au type,Authentication etc etc or is there certain fields i should learn Any help would be useful -Original Message- From: Cisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT/PAT port pass-through Hi all, Im just experimenting with NAT/PAT and want to try to tunnel back to an internal NT server to establish a VPN with it. Say the internal address is 10.1.1.100 I want to pass all traffic from the external IP w.x.y.z(i s0) to internal 10.1.1.100(int e0) for the following ports Protocol ID TCP, Port 1723 Protocol ID 47, port all Can anyone help out with some config pointers? I've got NAT/PAT set up and working. I would like to use PPTP to the router and let the router establish the VPN but I don't think this router will support it. It is running 11.1(c1600-y-l.113-2) Any thoughts? Craig Lindstrom eSage http://www.eSage.com (801) 796-9595 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: Cisco Lab Tax Write Off
I've always claimed mine. Along with any books and the cost of taking the exams. I use Turbo Tax and claim it under "Work-Related Expenses" as an "education" expense. Here is what 'turbo tax' has been telling me -> "You can deduct expenses for education - even though it may lead to a degree if - 1) It is required by your employer or the law to keep your job OR 2) It maintains or improves skills required by your present job AND it is not 1) Needed to meet the minimum requirements to qualify for a job OR 2) It will qualify you for a different job or trade" I figure all of these routers/books/test are improving my current skills (2), so that applies. PLEASE NOTE -> This is what I have been doing, but I won't guarantee it's right. If you use it and get audited, don't blame me, they will probably be doing the same here :) > Are router's/switche's/isdn simulator's purchased for the home lab > tax deductible. Also, are the ciscopress textbook's tax deductible > expense. > > Is anyone else claiming these on the Federal Taxes? > > TIA _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azlan CCIE training UK
hello, there a two trainer`s that i know who run these classes. Mike Reid and John berry Mike has been CCIE for 5 yrs + teaches SEC + VOIP ..and has a tendancy to know everything.he was recently asked by BT to write some questions for there internal BGP accreditionand has a tendency to box your ears...by making it as hard as possible without killing you. 0John is the same but has been a CCIE for 7+ yrs he teaches SEC+VOIP+SNA-IP.and has a tendency to push you in the cCIE lab as far as you can go... "i wont of them will make it easy..becuase the lab isn`t easy. So i you don`t want to waste you moneystudy hard before you come" those are his words. they have both been a great help to me in my study`s (i don`t work there i just seem to spend most of my time there) regards steve >From: "Ged Bowey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Ged Bowey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Azlan CCIE training UK >Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:22:44 - > >Hi all, has any one any experience of the CCIE R&S training program Azlan >provide. I would like feed back as to the quality of the training and it's >relevance. > >Cheers Ged Bowey CCNP. > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with configuring VPN between Cisco 7100s and Concentrator 3000s
Hi Everyone, I have to set up VPN communication for some our customers to access our network via the Internet. At my site, I will be using Cisco 7100 routers with 2interfaces, one points to the Internet (129.174.1.8), the other interface points to the internalnetwork (172.16.1.1). At the customer site, they will use cisco concentrator 3000s which has 2 interfaces as well. One interface points to the Internet (204.91.1.11), the other interface points to their internal network (192.168.1.1). They would like to be able from a work station on their network (i.e. 192.168.1.2 for example), to access on of the servers in our internal network (172.16.1.100). The VPN communication will be implemented with IPsec. I am sure that this has been done before. If someone has a similar configuration, please send it to me. I have done something between a client making a VPN connection to a server via PPTP (microsoft cheesy way of implementing VPN) before; however, I am new at this concentrator and cisco 7100s routers. Please help... John C. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pix Firewall Issue
Kevin, The newest Cisco VPN3000 client (I believe that it is 2.6b and should be on CCO within a week or 2) that supports Win2000 will terminate to a PIX running 5.2 (I believe) or newer. I would suggest loading your 515 with the newest code (5.3.1). You should be getting another email from me with the link to the code. Grab the VPN software when available. Tim O'Gilvie"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know of a vpn client for Windows 2000, I have Cisco Secure but > it doesnt run on 2000, I need to implement a vpn solution for my company > that will integrate with the PIX 515 that I just purchased.. > > Regards, > > Kevin > > > >From: "Kenny Sallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Kenny Sallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Pix Firewall Issue > >Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:55:14 -0800 > > > >Actually it's not a good idea to do a 'conduit permit icmp any any'. If > >you > >want ping traffic to originate inside then do this: > > > >conduit permit icmp 208.184.23.0 255.255.255.0 any echoreply > > > >Think about the way ping works - your workstation sends an icmp echo - the > >end station sends an icmp echo-reply - which from the PIX standpoint is a > >new inbound packet ( cuz it's stateless ). Therefore - let the echo-reply > >in only. Not all ICMP messages. > > > >Kenny > > > >"Daniel Cotts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >303479FA060CD211B893F805A88AA10F4C@EXCHANGE1">news:303479FA060CD211B893F805A88AA10F4C@EXCHANGE1... > > > You're not telling us from where you are pinging. From the PIX? From a > >host > > > behind the Firewall? From a host outside the Firewall? > > > Anyway this command is good to have in later versions if you want pings > >to > > > traverse the PIX. > > > conduit permit icmp any any > > > You may also want to modify that command or eliminate it, if you want to > > > enforce a stronger policy. > > > > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v50/config/co n > > > fig.htm#xtocid1091627 > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 1:09 PM > > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > Subject: Pix Firewall Issue > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Gang, > > > > > > > > I have a Pix Firewall 520 and wondered if this was a feature or a > > > > configuration issue on my firwall. We have an entire class C > > > > address say > > > > 208.184.23.x to use for our network. We use the 192.168.1.x > > > > network for our > > > > internal network. I am having problems pinging a machine's > > > > Internet ip > > > > address say 208.184.23.11 which I noticed is statically mapped to it's > > > > internal address say 192.168.1.10 on the pix. > > > > > > > > For example, If I ping another box 208.184.23.12 and not > > > > statically mapped > > > > to a internal ip address on the pix, I get a response. > > > > > > > > Any help or hints would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > _ > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct > > > > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >_ > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SBI/PacBell "Basic" ADSL PVCs?
Jason, I'm not a cisco expert (yet) so please forgive me when I say I'm not sure what you mean by "neither get me past Layer 2 ATM." Is it that the 1720 won't let you authenticate to the ISP? It seems your PVCs are correct, but I've seen on www.dslreports.com that some folks have tried 0/33, so you might want to try that. Also, make sure that you check to make sure that there's still a DSL signal by keeping the Westell set up as well. I hope that helps. Regards, Randy Blair - CNA, MCP Field Engineer, SBC/Advanced Solutions Inc. Ameritech Region - Original Message - From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:50 PM Subject: SBI/PacBell "Basic" ADSL PVCs? > Here's what I just sent off to PacBell's support team, but I'm sure I'll > have to battle their live tech support personnel to get in touch with an > engineer who can answer this (if someone else knows, that'd be great as my > ATM knowledge is limited to configuring a few 1417 ADSL CPE routers): > > Up until this point the customer has connected with their Westel Wirespeed > using the EnterNet 300 software. However, we're moving to a new platform for > VPN support and security: > > I'm configuring a Cisco 1720 router with an ADSL interface card for a > customer with Basic ADSL which uses PPPoE. The Cisco 1720 supports PPPoE > authentication, but I first need more ATM info. What PVC information should > I configure for the router? I've tried 0/35 & 8/35 (the two standard PVCs I > know about for Enhanced ADSL), but neither get me past Layer 2 ATM. > > -- > > As a side note, here's the base config I used on the 1720 and also on an > 827-4v for my personal static "Enhanced" ADSL connection (no need for PPPoE, > and PVC 0/35 worked): > > bridge irb > ! > ! > ! > interface ATM0 > no ip address > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > atm vc-per-vp 256 > no atm ilmi-keepalive > pvc 0/35 > ! > dsl operating-mode auto > no fair-queue > bridge-group 1 > ! > interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 192.168.45.172 255.255.255.0 > speed auto > ! > interface BVI1 > ! I configure a static MAC so that I don't have to wait > ! for the PBI router's ARP table to > ! clear out when I change routers > mac-address .0c85.8f1c > ip address 63.206.176.162 255.255.255.248 > ! > ip classless > ! > bridge 1 protocol ieee > bridge 1 route ip > > > -- > Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ > List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ > Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DB60 to RJ45 adapters?
I found the adapters at... WWW.CSDATA.COM This message was sent by Cosmiverse. http://www.cosmiverse.com Get Your Free Email Account Today! Join us Today as a Digital Passenger aboard Cosmic Voyage 2000 ( http://www.cosmicvoyage2000.com )! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ip default route
I quote from: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c/ipcprt1/1cdipadr.htm "When IP routing is disabled, the default gateway feature and the router discovery client are enabled, and proxy ARP is disabled. When IP routing is enabled, the default gateway feature is disabled and you can configure proxy ARP and the router discovery servers." "IP routing is automatically enabled in the Cisco IOS software. If you choose to set up the router to bridge rather than route IP datagrams, you must disable IP routing. To reenable IP routing if it has been disabled, use the following command in global configuration mode: ip routing" In other words, defining a "ip default-gateway" is just a method for locating routes when you set up your router to act as a bridge. birs wrote: > > Hello > > It might sound trivial, but can anyone explain the difference between: > > ip default-gateway 10.0.1.1 > > and > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.1.1 > > Thanks > > Birsen Ozturk > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mihai Dumitru Systems Engineer, ROMSYS SA tel: +40 1 2300810, mobile: +40 92 764287 fax: +40 1 2300815 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Space Phone
> Would someone send me a copy of the Cisco Space Phone email, I seemed to > have lost mine. > > Thanks > > Cameron Ashley > Sr. Network Engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Space Phone -
Thanks guys/gals for sending the email to me. Cameron Ashley Sr. Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would like to buy 2 2501 routers
Good morning, I would like to purchase 2 2501 routers minimum 4MB flash, 8 MB DRAM for a total price of around $1000. If you would like to sell them quickly, please email me. Kindly don't waste your time on telling me your thoughts on this price, use that time more wisely answering questions on this list. :-P Thank you! Jim Croyle _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Azlan CCIE training UK
ASH, they do 2 one week labs which cost 1700 quid EACH. they take place in london and wokingham ...i recon wokingham is the best location as that is where there head office is and where john berry works. are they worth it? Well it depends ...there are usually between 4-6 people on it and he will work you as hard as you can work.most people i spoke to found it an eye-opener because they thought they knew more than they did... (when he breaks the lab he is nastyto make it as real as possible). my advise take one week ...but prep before you go so you end up getting the most out of it(know the theory inside and out ...then you can concentrate on picking his brain) one group got stuck on day two because he changed an ip and no-one noticed I intend going soon ..if i can (long story) for at least a week what i intend doing is take 2 weeks of .1st week study.hands-on at home ...second week...lab that way i get the most out of it... i hope this helps steve >From: "Ash Aslam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Stephen Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Azlan CCIE training UK >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:23:30 - > >Hi Stephen, > >Any ideas how much these CCIE classes cost and the duration? > >Also are they worth the cost in your opinion? > >Thanks, >Ash > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Stephen Skinner >Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:57 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Azlan CCIE training UK > > > >hello, > >there a two trainer`s that i know who run these classes. >Mike Reid and John berry > >Mike has been CCIE for 5 yrs + teaches SEC + VOIP ..and has a tendancy to >know everything.he was recently asked by BT to write some >questions for there internal BGP accreditionand has a tendency to box >your ears...by making it as hard as possible without killing you. > >0John is the same but has been a CCIE for 7+ yrs he teaches >SEC+VOIP+SNA-IP.and has a tendency to push you in the cCIE lab as far >as >you can go... > >"i wont of them will make it easy..becuase the lab isn`t easy. > >So i you don`t want to waste you moneystudy hard before you come" > >those are his words. > >they have both been a great help to me in my study`s (i don`t work there i >just seem to spend most of my time there) > >regards > >steve > > >From: "Ged Bowey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Ged Bowey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Azlan CCIE training UK > >Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:22:44 - > > > >Hi all, has any one any experience of the CCIE R&S training program Azlan > >provide. I would like feed back as to the quality of the training and >it's > >relevance. > > > >Cheers Ged Bowey CCNP. > > > > > >_ > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fw: Is this COOL or what? Cisco Space Phones!
Have you seen the IP SoftPhone, yet? There's a demo on Cisco web site. Go to http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/largeent/avvid/solutions/collaboration. html and click on "See a Flash Demo of Cisco IP Phone" -Original Message- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:42 AM To: Arthur Simplina; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fw: Is this COOL or what? Cisco Space Phones! So, wheres the URL or info on 'Cisco Space Phones' ? --- Arthur Simplina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is COOL!!! > > >Received this today from my inside sales manager. > > > >Though you "might" consider blowing your own horn - > it is still cool. > > > >Kevin Wigle __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adding rights to privileged???
Hi Group, I wanted to know if it was possible to allow somebody with only privileged level access to a device, to see more than they normally can? Basically, when they type the "show ?" command set, is there a way to allow them to see more parameters than they normally can? Also, if this is possible, would this be the same for everybody that went into the device under privileged mode? Thanks for the help all... Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNP, CCDA Saint Gobain WAN Team Cisco Network Specialist Work: (610) 341-7678 Mobile: (267) 981-1123 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: alternative to Cisco routers
Why would you not trust a Linux box to route? What experience or documentation do you have that would lead you to believe that a properly configured Linux box could not or would not do the job. There are a lot of companies using Linux these days. One of largest distributed processing systems is based on large linux clusters, most of Mariott's reservation system is based on it. Lot's of ISP's use it as their core e-mail, and web systems, and I have seen some departmental use of Linux or Windows NT machines being used as routers. A cisco router is not that much different in architecture. At the highest level, It is a processor that runs a unix kernel based OS with some NIC or serial interfaces and an application designed specifically for routing. The real difference is in the software that runs on the router. There is no special ASIC's or processors on the router. IT is a computer (less intel pentium processor except in the PIX) w/o the added multimedia and I/O hardware, driven by a unix kernel running software , very similiar to any other computer. The real difference is in the application, or software it runs, not it's hardware architecure. My understanding is that some of the processors found in the router are the same that can be found in certain Apple or Macintosh PC's and other non-windows based cpu's. This is my humble opinion based on my limited knowledge of the router architecture. However I agree that it would not be appropriate to place a linux box at the core of your network there are certainly times or applications and solutions where it would be fine. It is not designed specifically for routing, but it will certainly do the job if simple routing is all that is needed. -Original Message- From: William E. Gragido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'anthony kim' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 10:47 PM Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers >Are you serious? You would use a Linux box in place of a router Are you >mad man? I mean, I am as much a fan of Linux as the next geek, however I >would not entrust routing/switching duties to it. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >anthony kim >Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 7:24 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: alternative to Cisco routers > > >This is all well and good for the big time players, ISPs, big corps >yadda yadda yadda, and companies with cash to burn like so much old toilet >paper. The Small and Midsized Business market (SMB) almost always can >accomplish what they want with free Unix or Linux for layer 3 and >cheap stackable switches with or without 802.1q support. > >So my obligatory cisco alternative: >www.zebra.org > >On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 04:00:36PM -0600, William E. Gragido wrote: >>There ServerIronXL Layer 4-7 switches are pretty cool boxes as well. >>Foundry is also pretty nice in that their command line interface is awfully >>reminiscent of Cisco's. The transition from one to the other should not be >>too difficult. >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Christopher Kolp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:41 PM >>To: 'Brant Stevens'; 'William E. Gragido'; 'Howard C. Berkowitz'; >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers >> >> >>Foundry prices are killer and the performance is top notch. >> >>We're planning a roll out with 40 OC-12 POS. Guess who our preferred >>provider is? >> >>None other than foundry. >> >>-ck >> >> >> >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >>Brant Stevens >>Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 4:28 PM >>To: William E. Gragido; 'Howard C. Berkowitz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers >> >> >>Not to mention Foundry... >> >>Brant I. Stevens >>Internetwork Solutions Engineer >>Thrupoint, Inc. >>545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor >>New York, NY. 10017 >>646-562-6540 >> >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >>William E. Gragido >>Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:47 PM >>To: 'Howard C. Berkowitz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers >> >> >>Riding on the coat tails of Howard's comments, there are also other players >>out there like Lucent(home of the Nexibit N64000 Terabit Switch Router and >>the Ascend product lines), Avici, Charlette's Web, Nortel etc., that offer >>carrier grade solutions. >> >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >>Howard C. Berkowitz >>Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 1:20 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: alternative to Cisco routers >> >> >>A few comments, in which I think I am being reasonably objective. >> >>On this list, people periodically speak of the joys of Cisco, because >>it offers end-to-end solutions. That is a very enterprise-oriented >>view. >> >>Much more than in the enterp
adding rights to user mode??? (oops)
Sorry, got mixed up with modes...I meant user... Hi Group, I wanted to know if it was possible to allow somebody with only user level access to a device, to see more than they normally can? Basically, when they type the "show ?" command set, is there a way to allow them to see more parameters than they normally can? Also, if this is possible, would this be the same for everybody that went into the device under user mode? Thanks for the help all... Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNP, CCDA Saint Gobain WAN Team Cisco Network Specialist Work: (610) 341-7678 Mobile: (267) 981-1123 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2621 FastEthernet<-Trunking-> 2924XL <-Trunking>1912Enterprise Setup
>>> "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/14/01 6:42:19 PM >>> > >I'm looking for an example config of a 2924XL switch trunking to the a >fastethernet port on a 2621 and trunking to a 1912 using ISL. I've searched >CCO without luck. Please post anything relevent. > >Thanks - Dave Here is a sample config for trunking four vlans between a 2620 and a 2924XL. This is just a sample, but it is a working configuration. Cisco 2620: interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address speed 100 full-duplex ! interface FastEthernet0/0.1 description To User LAN encapsulation isl 1 ip address 10.12.103.70 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet0/0.2 description Branch Security VLAN encapsulation isl 2 ip address 10.12.203.129 255.255.255.224 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet0/0.3 description Voice TLAN encapsulation isl 3 ip address 10.12.203.33 255.255.255.224 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet0/0.4 description Voice ELAN encapsulation isl 4 ip address 10.12.203.65 255.255.255.224 no ip redirects ! --- Catalyst 2924XL: interface FastEthernet0/1 description ISL trunk to 2600 duplex full speed 100 switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast ! ! interface FastEthernet0/23 duplex half speed 10 switchport access vlan 3 ! interface FastEthernet0/24 duplex half speed 10 switchport access vlan 4 ! interface VLAN1 ip address 10.12.103.16 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache ! HTH, John _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ip default gateway
I think what you really wanted to do was use "Ip default-network" here is a link that will explain it to you further and what the difference is. It has to do with weather you have ip routing enabled on your system. Karl http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/default.html -Original Message- From: birs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 5:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ip default gateway Hello I just had a situation like this: I connected a Cisco1750 to Catalist2924, and then Catalist2924 to Catalist8540 and configured "ip default-gateway 10.0.1.1" in 1750(10.0.1.1 is the ip of 8540). Then 1750 was ping'in only 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.240's hosts and no other network in my backbone. Then I turned "ip default gateway 10.0.1.1" into "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.1.1" and my Cisco1750 started pinging every ip in my backbone. I will be grateful if anyone explains why "ip default-gateway" didn't worked and what is the difference between these two. Thanks. Birsen Ozturk _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SBI/PacBell "Basic" ADSL PVCs?
Why are you wasting your time with ATM over broadband? ""Jason"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 96fumt$fi9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96fumt$fi9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Here's what I just sent off to PacBell's support team, but I'm sure I'll > have to battle their live tech support personnel to get in touch with an > engineer who can answer this (if someone else knows, that'd be great as my > ATM knowledge is limited to configuring a few 1417 ADSL CPE routers): > > Up until this point the customer has connected with their Westel Wirespeed > using the EnterNet 300 software. However, we're moving to a new platform for > VPN support and security: > > I'm configuring a Cisco 1720 router with an ADSL interface card for a > customer with Basic ADSL which uses PPPoE. The Cisco 1720 supports PPPoE > authentication, but I first need more ATM info. What PVC information should > I configure for the router? I've tried 0/35 & 8/35 (the two standard PVCs I > know about for Enhanced ADSL), but neither get me past Layer 2 ATM. > > -- > > As a side note, here's the base config I used on the 1720 and also on an > 827-4v for my personal static "Enhanced" ADSL connection (no need for PPPoE, > and PVC 0/35 worked): > > bridge irb > ! > ! > ! > interface ATM0 > no ip address > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > atm vc-per-vp 256 > no atm ilmi-keepalive > pvc 0/35 > ! > dsl operating-mode auto > no fair-queue > bridge-group 1 > ! > interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 192.168.45.172 255.255.255.0 > speed auto > ! > interface BVI1 > ! I configure a static MAC so that I don't have to wait > ! for the PBI router's ARP table to > ! clear out when I change routers > mac-address .0c85.8f1c > ip address 63.206.176.162 255.255.255.248 > ! > ip classless > ! > bridge 1 protocol ieee > bridge 1 route ip > > > -- > Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ > List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ > Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
That's true, conduits are going away. The only reason you see them is for backward compatibility issues. Definitely use static commands with access-lists. Its a two-step process, but its a nice feature. HTH Nabil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command Does anybody know about the advantage of having static conduit command compare with access-list/access-group command in PIX?. I heard that the static conduit will no longer available in the future realease. Is it True??. Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding rights to privileged???
Well it depends on what your doing? Are you setting the privilege mode in the router or are you using something like CiscoSecure/Tacacs+ ? Karl -Original Message- From: Zabludovsky, Mark A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 9:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: adding rights to privileged??? Hi Group, I wanted to know if it was possible to allow somebody with only privileged level access to a device, to see more than they normally can? Basically, when they type the "show ?" command set, is there a way to allow them to see more parameters than they normally can? Also, if this is possible, would this be the same for everybody that went into the device under privileged mode? Thanks for the help all... Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNP, CCDA Saint Gobain WAN Team Cisco Network Specialist Work: (610) 341-7678 Mobile: (267) 981-1123 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INCREDIBLY OFF TOPIC: Phones?
Hi there guys, Sorry for the offtopic post, but I'm hoping to query up some info from the best and brightest in this business. Please respond to my e-mail address at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you feel the list doesn't need to hear your replies. My question is this: We have a severely aging PC-based PBX system that sucks. We were looking at VoIP and IP Phones, but have no idea where to start or how to sort out the features. Can anyone give me the location of any compare and constrast articles on the subject? or maybe a name and number of a dealer or someone I could talk to about it? Thanks in advance and once again, sorry for posting off topic. You guys are just so helpful. Denis Denis A. Baldwin - Network Administrator A+ / Network + / I-Net+ / MCP _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: alternative to Cisco routers
--- Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think Cisco, in any way, will beat a Linux box in pricing. > > As far as performance go, if you look at it in an objective way, the > advantage of a cisco router wouldn't matter that much for a company of > under > 100 people. > > I love Cisco but there is a time and a place when it comes to > implementing > their solution. In fact, Foundry switches that I had tested kicked their > butt but we ended up going with a Cisco switch because my boss "knows" > the > Cisco reputation. Being an engineer, I can only give him facts and > figures > and its up to the people signing the checks to decide who they want to > go > for. > been there, done that, didn't even get a lousy t-shirt. we all feel your pain. __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Azlan CCIE training UK
Thanks for your insight, I guess I had better get my books out before I book the course. Ged Bowey ""Stephen Skinner"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > ASH, > > they do 2 one week labs which cost 1700 quid EACH. > they take place in london and wokingham ...i recon wokingham is the best > location as that is where there head office is and where john berry works. > > are they worth it? > > Well it depends ...there are usually between 4-6 people on it and he will > work you as hard as you can work.most people i spoke to found it an > eye-opener because they thought they knew more than they did... > (when he breaks the lab he is nastyto make it as real as possible). > > my advise take one week ...but prep before you go so you end up getting the > most out of it(know the theory inside and out ...then you can concentrate on > picking his brain) one group got stuck on day two because he changed an > ip and no-one noticed > > I intend going soon ..if i can (long story) for at least a week what i > intend doing is take 2 weeks of .1st week study.hands-on at home > ...second week...lab that way i get the most out of it... > > i hope this helps > > steve > > >From: "Ash Aslam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Stephen Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: Azlan CCIE training UK > >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:23:30 - > > > >Hi Stephen, > > > >Any ideas how much these CCIE classes cost and the duration? > > > >Also are they worth the cost in your opinion? > > > >Thanks, > >Ash > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Stephen Skinner > >Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:57 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Azlan CCIE training UK > > > > > > > >hello, > > > >there a two trainer`s that i know who run these classes. > >Mike Reid and John berry > > > >Mike has been CCIE for 5 yrs + teaches SEC + VOIP ..and has a tendancy to > >know everything.he was recently asked by BT to write some > >questions for there internal BGP accreditionand has a tendency to box > >your ears...by making it as hard as possible without killing you. > > > >0John is the same but has been a CCIE for 7+ yrs he teaches > >SEC+VOIP+SNA-IP.and has a tendency to push you in the cCIE lab as far > >as > >you can go... > > > >"i wont of them will make it easy..becuase the lab isn`t easy. > > > >So i you don`t want to waste you moneystudy hard before you come" > > > >those are his words. > > > >they have both been a great help to me in my study`s (i don`t work there i > >just seem to spend most of my time there) > > > >regards > > > >steve > > > > >From: "Ged Bowey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: "Ged Bowey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Azlan CCIE training UK > > >Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:22:44 - > > > > > >Hi all, has any one any experience of the CCIE R&S training program Azlan > > >provide. I would like feed back as to the quality of the training and > >it's > > >relevance. > > > > > >Cheers Ged Bowey CCNP. > > > > > > > > >_ > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >_ > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > >_ > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work.
See comments inline: >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Paul Werner >Sent: February 14, 2001 10:09 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work. > >>Okay, here's the jist of things. > >Big huge mondo snip... > > >> So... do we have an active looped topology? I doubt it. >> Likely, Spanning Tree's working just fine. Check the LED's on both >> of your switches to see if you see a solid orange glow... > >Leigh Anne, > >I like your style and troubleshooting methodology. I think you >have honed in on the root cause of the problem (pun intended :-) >I don't have the previous day's post, but there were a few >entries that were dead culprits as to the problem. After >reviewing the snipped configs, I am now more convinced than >ever. It is a loss of connectivity issue. It is true that the >uplink ports will both need to be trunked (and only one was >shown as trunking), but that will not fully explain the STP >problem. if you looked at the 2nd post where all of the >interface stats were shown, you would have noticed that on all >of the ports that were alledged to be trunking, two of them had >duplex and speed status unknown. LAC: Pierre-Alex indicated he was providing statistics on all ports that were active - not "alleged to be trunking". A quick review of the running-config on the 2924XL showed that only 0/20 was set to actively trunk. I did review all duplex and speed configurations on all of his ports (and noted what VLANs each were set for). Active ports on the 2924XL were 1, 9, 16, 20, 21, and 24. Ports 1 and 8 were configured to be members of VLAN3. Ports 9, 16, and 24 were configured to be members of VLAN2. That only left ports 20 and 21 - both of which were running at 100 Mbps full duplex: FastEthernet0/20 is up, line protocol is up Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX FastEthernet0/21 is up, line protocol is up Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX (See the bottom of this email for excerpts from Pierre-Alex's configs for these interfaces). Fa 0/21 wasn't explicitly configured to be trunking - and a review of the port's statistics indicated that there hadn't been any input received on the port for 3 hours, 49 mins, 16 seconds. That meant that IF Fa 0/21 WAS in fact physically connected to Fa 0/27 on the 1912, Fa 0/27 wasn't sending frames. Why wouldn't it? It appeared to be functional... It should have been sending BPDUs every 2 seconds. So... for some reason, it wasn't communicating. Pierre-Alex confirmed that Fa 0/21 was in fact physically connected to Fa 0/27. The one aspect of the configuration that wasn't kosher was that Fa 0/21 wasn't set to trunk. I asked him to set it to trunk, and voila, spanning tree blocked Fa 0/27 as expected. So... I had in fact ruled out duplex and speed mismatches between the "trunking" ports - so I knew that wasn't the cause. By the way, thanks for the compliment on my troubleshooting skills. I personally really enjoyed Pierre-Alex's scenerio and I must say, my knowledge of Spanning Tree and switching was really challenged during this exercise. Took me a while to pick through everything, but my spanning tree troubleshooting skill-set increased significantly as a result of this exercise! Thanks to Paul Borghese for maintaining this list for these many months. He's really the one responsible for all of us having this opportunity to learn from stuff like this... -- Leigh Anne >That is a dead ringer for this sort of dilemma. Always hard >code your duplex and speed settings for trunks. I cannot think >of a good reason not to, and lots of good reasons against. >If you check the last config posted, you will note that the >speed and duplex were not hard coded. > >HTH, > >Paul Werner - ON THE 1912 FastEthernet 0/26 is Enabled Hardware is Built-in 100Base-TX Duplex/Flow Control setting: Auto-negotiate Auto-negotiation status: Full duplex Receive Statistics Transmit Statistics --- - Frames filtered 18511 Single collisions 0 Runt frames 0 Multiple collisions 0 No buffer discards0 Excessive collisions0 Queue full discards 0 Errors: Errors: FCS errors 0Late collisions 0 Alignment errors0Excessive deferrals 0 Giant frames0Jabber errors 0 Address violations 0Other transmit errors 0 FastEthernet 0/27 is Enabled Duplex/Flow Control setting: Auto-negotiate Auto-negotiation status: Full duplex Receive Statistics Transmit Statistics --- - Frames filtered 0 Single collisions 0 Runt frames 0 Multiple collisions 0 No buffer discards
RE: adding rights to privileged???(DONE)
Sorry, I meant user mode, and I already figured out that my problem wasn't a problem at all. Thanks for the time though... ;o) -Original Message- From: West, Karl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:49 AM To: Zabludovsky, Mark A; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: adding rights to privileged??? Well it depends on what your doing? Are you setting the privilege mode in the router or are you using something like CiscoSecure/Tacacs+ ? Karl -Original Message- From: Zabludovsky, Mark A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 9:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: adding rights to privileged??? Hi Group, I wanted to know if it was possible to allow somebody with only privileged level access to a device, to see more than they normally can? Basically, when they type the "show ?" command set, is there a way to allow them to see more parameters than they normally can? Also, if this is possible, would this be the same for everybody that went into the device under privileged mode? Thanks for the help all... Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNP, CCDA Saint Gobain WAN Team Cisco Network Specialist Work: (610) 341-7678 Mobile: (267) 981-1123 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: modem dialer/tester
greetings all, Sorry for the off-top subject!!! I'm looking for a little utility to dial my RAS lines and check for ring-no answer line, busy signals and handshake signals. I've about 25 ras/nas boxes, I want to have the program dial and log each box. Any feed back or suggestions would be great. Thanks, Nabil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which CVOICE book???
Hi Group, Wanted to know which book/s I should read to prep for the CVOICE specialization exam. I like Lammle's style of writing (understandable). I don't just want to pass the test cause I think that voice is gonna be huge, so I also want a book that will teach my what I need to know. Anybody that has taken the test or read any of these books please help me out. I want to place my order asap on the book. Thanks, Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNP, CCDA Saint Gobain WAN Team Cisco Network Specialist Work: (610) 341-7678 Mobile: (267) 981-1123 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate!
"Why did yours reset to its original value while mine retained its new path cost? We're both running 9.00.04 code so I wouldn't suspect a bug to be the cause of the problem... One possibility may be that if you set your port path cost and then immediately reset your switch" This is precisely the mistake I made. While I figured it out, everything worked OK. Thanks again. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 6:58 PM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! "Once the root bridge has been selected, all bridges and switches in the network calculate the shortest path distance between itself and the root bridge. Each port sends a configuration BPDU message to determine the cost between itself and the root bridge. The port with the lowest cost is designated as the root port for the bridge. " On my Catalyst 1924-F-EN, I set the port cost of Ethernet 0/1 to 50 using the "spantree cost 50" command. I then typed reload. Once the switch was back up, I issued the command "show span". Results were: Port Ethernet 0/1 of VLAN1 is Forwarding Port path cost 50, Port priority 128 Why did yours reset to its original value while mine retained its new path cost? We're both running 9.00.04 code so I wouldn't suspect a bug to be the cause of the problem... One possibility may be that if you set your port path cost and then immediately reset your switch, your changes may not have been saved in NVRAM. Verify that you used the appropriate command and that you waited at least 20 seconds before issuing a "reload" command. Give it another try... "Port ID: Each port on a bridge or switch is assigned a unique 2-byte identifier. The Port ID is composed of a one-byte priority value configurable by an administrator, followed by a 1-byte value assigned by the device to the port." Port priority does influence the selection of the designated or root port when two or more ports on the bridge are connected the same remote bridge/switch. So, why won't setting the port priority influence which port becomes blocked? Give this a whirl and then let me know what happens--try equalizing port priorities on 0/26 and 0/27 on the 1912 (restore to default settings). Now alter the port priorities on the 2924XL's 0/20 and 0/21 ports. Does it make a difference? -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pierre-Alex Sent: February 14, 2001 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! Here is another challenging problem I have. Anyone? Switch 1912-EN is connected to Switch 2924XL via two trunks (Port A and port B.) The spanning tree has disabled port B to prevent a loop. I am trying to force B to go in fowarding mode and have A be in blocking mode. I tried changing the cost of the path, but the swith rectified it to 10. So I thought: "well, I can change the priority of the interfaces and reload the switch and that should do the trick". Well it did not (See below). I can only think of two things: A. I have not understood proprely the use of a port priority and I am changing the wrong parameter B. I have changed the right parameter but there is something else that I am missing in the configuration. Port FastEthernet 0/26 of VLAN1 is Forwarding Port path cost 10, Port priority 100<-- I changed this from 128 to 100 Designated root has priority 32768, address 0050.3EF0.3580 Designated bridge has priority 32768, address 0050.3EF0.3580 Designated port is 22, path cost 0 Timers: message age 20, forward delay 15, hold 1 --More-- Port FastEthernet 0/27 of VLAN1 is Blocking Port path cost 10, Port priority 0 <--I changed this from 128 to 0 Designated root has priority 32768, address 0050.3EF0.3580 Designated bridge has priority 32768, address 0050.3EF0.3580 Designated port is 23, path cost 0 Timers: message age 20, forward delay 15, hold 1 Pierre-Alex As several people have found out recently, I **love** understanding all the nuances of why technology works the way it does. When things go wrong, it's so much easier to identify a problem when you can compare what SHOULD be happening to what IS occurring. Took me a while to pick through everything, but my spanning tree troubleshooting skill-set increased significantly as a result of this exercise! Thanks for the opportunity! -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 14, 2001 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail) Cc: Dale Cunningham; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:PROBLEM FIXED: --> DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Does not Work. HI LEIGH ANNE and everyone, The problem was fixed by a
RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate!
There was a typo in my previous message (see below) "While I figured " Should be read: "When I figured it ..." Pierre-Alex "Why did yours reset to its original value while mine retained its new path cost? We're both running 9.00.04 code so I wouldn't suspect a bug to be the cause of the problem... One possibility may be that if you set your port path cost and then immediately reset your switch" This is precisely the mistake I made. While I figured it out, everything worked OK. Thanks again. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 6:58 PM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! "Once the root bridge has been selected, all bridges and switches in the network calculate the shortest path distance between itself and the root bridge. Each port sends a configuration BPDU message to determine the cost between itself and the root bridge. The port with the lowest cost is designated as the root port for the bridge. " On my Catalyst 1924-F-EN, I set the port cost of Ethernet 0/1 to 50 using the "spantree cost 50" command. I then typed reload. Once the switch was back up, I issued the command "show span". Results were: Port Ethernet 0/1 of VLAN1 is Forwarding Port path cost 50, Port priority 128 Why did yours reset to its original value while mine retained its new path cost? We're both running 9.00.04 code so I wouldn't suspect a bug to be the cause of the problem... One possibility may be that if you set your port path cost and then immediately reset your switch, your changes may not have been saved in NVRAM. Verify that you used the appropriate command and that you waited at least 20 seconds before issuing a "reload" command. Give it another try... "Port ID: Each port on a bridge or switch is assigned a unique 2-byte identifier. The Port ID is composed of a one-byte priority value configurable by an administrator, followed by a 1-byte value assigned by the device to the port." Port priority does influence the selection of the designated or root port when two or more ports on the bridge are connected the same remote bridge/switch. So, why won't setting the port priority influence which port becomes blocked? Give this a whirl and then let me know what happens--try equalizing port priorities on 0/26 and 0/27 on the 1912 (restore to default settings). Now alter the port priorities on the 2924XL's 0/20 and 0/21 ports. Does it make a difference? -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pierre-Alex Sent: February 14, 2001 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! Here is another challenging problem I have. Anyone? Switch 1912-EN is connected to Switch 2924XL via two trunks (Port A and port B.) The spanning tree has disabled port B to prevent a loop. I am trying to force B to go in fowarding mode and have A be in blocking mode. I tried changing the cost of the path, but the swith rectified it to 10. So I thought: "well, I can change the priority of the interfaces and reload the switch and that should do the trick". Well it did not (See below). I can only think of two things: A. I have not understood proprely the use of a port priority and I am changing the wrong parameter B. I have changed the right parameter but there is something else that I am missing in the configuration. Port FastEthernet 0/26 of VLAN1 is Forwarding Port path cost 10, Port priority 100<-- I changed this from 128 to 100 Designated root has priority 32768, address 0050.3EF0.3580 Designated bridge has priority 32768, address 0050.3EF0.3580 Designated port is 22, path cost 0 Timers: message age 20, forward delay 15, hold 1 --More-- Port FastEthernet 0/27 of VLAN1 is Blocking Port path cost 10, Port priority 0 <--I changed this from 128 to 0 Designated root has priority 32768, address 0050.3EF0.3580 Designated bridge has priority 32768, address 0050.3EF0.3580 Designated port is 23, path cost 0 Timers: message age 20, forward delay 15, hold 1 Pierre-Alex As several people have found out recently, I **love** understanding all the nuances of why technology works the way it does. When things go wrong, it's so much easier to identify a problem when you can compare what SHOULD be happening to what IS occurring. Took me a while to pick through everything, but my spanning tree troubleshooting skill-set increased significantly as a result of this exercise! Thanks for the opportunity! -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 14, 2001 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail) Cc: Dale Cunningham; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:PROBLEM FIXED: --
RE: Cisco Space Phone
Here it is: - Original Message - From: "Will Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 9:15 AM Subject: Is this COOL or what? Cisco Space Phones! > Enjoy the read!! > > > >>Yesterday, at approximately 4:09 PM Central, the first phone call from > space was made. Astronaut Marsha Ivin, using a Cisco IP SoftPhone on the > Space Shuttle Atlantis, made the first and second telephone calls EVER from > space. > >> > >> > >>NASA has had CallManager software in a development lab since prior to > the Selsius acquisition by Cisco. The Selsius, and now second-generation > Cisco phones, have been unusually tolerant to the satellite delay between > Mission Control in Houston and the Shuttle. Brett Parrish, lead NASA > engineer on this project, holds our CallManager software in very high > regard, especially since finding it works over satellite delay without > modification between our hardware-based phones (tested to up to 1.2 seconds > of delay). Brett has stated that it is very unusual for an application to > work out of the box with this type of delay. > >> > >> > >>Since certification for flight is an extremely long and, at times, > extremely political process, NASA decided to use SoftPhone for the first > trial. The main reason for this is that the laptop PCs used by NASA > astronauts have already been certified, and getting a software process in > flight is much easier than launching hardware. Extensive testing was > performed at NASA using custom-built equipment to replicate the delays and > LOS (Loss Of Signal) conditions common with the Space Shuttle. Minor > modifications were made to CallManager (inclusion of a service parameter) > and to SoftPhone (change in the order of events for call acceptance) by > Cisco development to address TAPI issues with delay, and SoftPhone was > approved for a trial flight. Unfortunately, this was not an official goal > of the Space Shuttle Atlantis, which simply meant testing was not > scheduled, and not guaranteed. Despite the lack of official stature for > this test, optimism that SoftPhone would be tested was very high as the > Astronauts had seen the application and were demanding that it fly with the > Shuttle. Imagine being out in space with no way to call home! Imagine being > IN space and being able to make a normal phone call anywhere! Despite all > the technological advances, separation is very apparent when out in space. > Never has an Astronaut been able to pick up a phone and place a call. > >> > >> > >>At approximately 4:00PM Central the opportunity to make a call using the > Cisco IP SoftPhone became available. Marsha Ivin, with a brief break in > official tasks, asked Space Command if there was time to try the IP > SoftPhone. The Flight Commander gave the go-ahead and the test was on!. > Marsha booted up the SoftPhone and at approximately 4:09PM made a call to > the Flight Director. The call went from her SoftPhone software through a > VG-200 gateway, over an FXO port, through a PBX to the phone on the Flight > Director s desk. They held a long and animated conversation (though what > was actually discussed is unknown) and at the end Marsha was granted > permission to call one of the 7960 phones in the POC (Payload Operations > Center). She made the call and it was answered by Brett Parrish. Marsha > asked So how do you like getting the second ever call from space? . After > speaking with Brett, Steve Schadelbauer of NASA was put on the line and he > spoke with Marsha. The conversations with Marsha lasted for several > minutes. Both Brett and Steve commented at how clear the conversation was > much better than the audio quality found on the radio conversations with > the Shuttle. > >> > >> > >>It was amazing at how much of a non-event this was. History in the > making but no scrambling, no trouble-shooting. IT JUST WORKS !!! Most of > the credit goes to Brett and Steve for their tireless testing and > replication of the Shuttle s environment. On the other hand, this is truly > an illustration of how Cisco s IP Telephony makes geographic location > irrelevant to audio communications. Anywhere, and that means ANYWHERE, you > have IP connectivity you have a COMMUNICATIONS network, which includes > telephony. The network works, no excuses! > >> > >> > >>This is a tribute to many things. Brett and Steve put our software and > hardware through the ringer at NASA subjecting it to delay, loss of signal, > and bit error rates well above what would be found even between Mission > Control and the Shuttle. As a result, this historic moment was a non event. > Also as a result, future applications are so real that only official > testing and approval stand in the way. We have successfully tested 7960 > phones in the Space Station and in the Shuttle and they work better than > the SoftPhone. It will be a while before we see them as mission
Re: ccnp routing frames
I didn't get any questions about the fields in the headers at all. I took it last week (and passed). "Robert Nickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message C05E7DA1218ED411BF8A00105AC95A8E01683F26@SV-CNTRMAIL">news:C05E7DA1218ED411BF8A00105AC95A8E01683F26@SV-CNTRMAIL... > On the CCNP routing exam is there any questions on (i.e do i have to > memorise) > frame for frame the format of hello packets,DD packets,LSA packet > frames...etc > like ..version,type,packet length,route ID,Area ID,Checksum,Au > type,Authentication etc etc > or is there certain fields i should learn > > Any help would be useful > -Original Message- > From: Cisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: NAT/PAT port pass-through > > > Hi all, > Im just experimenting with NAT/PAT and want to try to tunnel back to an > internal NT server to establish a VPN with it. Say the internal address is > 10.1.1.100 I want to pass all traffic from the external IP w.x.y.z(i s0) to > internal 10.1.1.100(int e0) for the following ports > > Protocol ID TCP, Port 1723 > Protocol ID 47, port all > > Can anyone help out with some config pointers? > > I've got NAT/PAT set up and working. > > I would like to use PPTP to the router and let the router establish the VPN > but I don't think this router will support it. It is running > 11.1(c1600-y-l.113-2) > > Any thoughts? > > Craig Lindstrom > eSage > http://www.eSage.com > (801) 796-9595 > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE:
Sathesh, in my bcran book there is a full chapter of 700. Check C's website though. martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 14 februari 2001 22:35 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: guyz: any comprehensive resource fo BCRAN ? any idea if there are questions on cisco 700 ? thanks,, - Get free personalized email at http://email.lycos.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate!
Dear Anne, I can answer this question. :) Case Scenario: (You may want to draw as you go along...) Swith A is the root bridge, and Switch B is the non-root bridge Switch A is connected to Switch B via to links of equal cost. We will call the ports on Switch A: W and X, and the ports on Switch B:Y and Z W is connected to Y and X is connected to Z Changing the priority of port Y or Z will have NO effect on the spanning tree. However changing the the priority of W or X will cause the following: 1) If W is greater than X, then Z will be blocked 2) If X is greater than W, then Y will be blocked I tried many other case scenarios yesterday evening. I can summurize them as follows: 1) If the cost of link WY and the cost of link XZ are not equal, then cost IS the criteria for deciding which port will be blocked and no change of priority (on W, X , Y ,Z) is going to change the spanning tree 2) If the cost of link WY and the cost of link XZ are equal, then the priorities set by ports X and W of the root bridge will be the determining factors. 3) If the priority of link WY and the priority of link XZ are the same, the non root bridge will choose as the root port, the sending port that had the lowest mac address (If we assume that W has a lower mac address than X, then port Y will be the root port and port Z will be blocked) Did that fulfill some of your thurst for knowledge? :) Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:38 AM To: Pierre-Alex Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! By the way... if you've got a few moments, would you like to try something for me? At the bottom of my email, I wanted to know why setting the port priority didn't influence which port becomes blocked. If the path costs of 0/26 and 0/27 were identical, which port priority values need to be altered to influence spanning tree path selection? Is it port priority on the 1912 or the 2924XL? -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 15, 2001 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! "Why did yours reset to its original value while mine retained its new path cost? We're both running 9.00.04 code so I wouldn't suspect a bug to be the cause of the problem... One possibility may be that if you set your port path cost and then immediately reset your switch" This is precisely the mistake I made. While I figured it out, everything worked OK. Thanks again. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 6:58 PM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! "Once the root bridge has been selected, all bridges and switches in the network calculate the shortest path distance between itself and the root bridge. Each port sends a configuration BPDU message to determine the cost between itself and the root bridge. The port with the lowest cost is designated as the root port for the bridge. " On my Catalyst 1924-F-EN, I set the port cost of Ethernet 0/1 to 50 using the "spantree cost 50" command. I then typed reload. Once the switch was back up, I issued the command "show span". Results were: Port Ethernet 0/1 of VLAN1 is Forwarding Port path cost 50, Port priority 128 Why did yours reset to its original value while mine retained its new path cost? We're both running 9.00.04 code so I wouldn't suspect a bug to be the cause of the problem... One possibility may be that if you set your port path cost and then immediately reset your switch, your changes may not have been saved in NVRAM. Verify that you used the appropriate command and that you waited at least 20 seconds before issuing a "reload" command. Give it another try... "Port ID: Each port on a bridge or switch is assigned a unique 2-byte identifier. The Port ID is composed of a one-byte priority value configurable by an administrator, followed by a 1-byte value assigned by the device to the port." Port priority does influence the selection of the designated or root port when two or more ports on the bridge are connected the same remote bridge/switch. So, why won't setting the port priority influence which port becomes blocked? Give this a whirl and then let me know what happens--try equalizing port priorities on 0/26 and 0/27 on the 1912 (restore to default settings). Now alter the port priorities on the 2924XL's 0/20 and 0/21 ports. Does it make a difference? -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pierre-Alex Sent: February 14, 2001 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! Here is another challenging problem I have.
Re: alitlle confused.
Need a little more detail ... and yes it could be an access list configuration issue. Can you actually ping from a node in network a the Unix Box in network B that you are attempting to telnet to ? Can you actually ping from the Unix Box in B to the node in Network A ? Can you telnet to the UNIX box in Network B from a host in Network B ? Or of course you can check the access-list settings on the router(s). - raj "Moahzam Durrani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > IF THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT NETWORKS A AND B , AND WE COULD PING FROM NETWORK A > TO B , BUT NOT TELNET TO A CERTAIN UNIX BOX ON NETWORK B, IS THIS AN > ACCESS-LIST ISSUE OR IS IT AT THE UNIX BOX THAT IS NOT PERMITTING TELNET . > > Mo Durrani > IS&T > WYSE\EDS > phone:408-473 1246 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alitlle confused.
IF THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT NETWORKS A AND B , AND WE COULD PING FROM NETWORK A TO B , BUT NOT TELNET TO A CERTAIN UNIX BOX ON NETWORK B, IS THIS AN ACCESS-LIST ISSUE OR IS IT AT THE UNIX BOX THAT IS NOT PERMITTING TELNET . Mo Durrani IS&T WYSE\EDS phone:408-473 1246 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: alitlle confused.
It could be either. Can you telnet to the box in network B from network B? Denis Denis A. Baldwin - Network Administrator A+ / Network + / I-Net+ / MCP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Moahzam Durrani Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: alitlle confused. IF THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT NETWORKS A AND B , AND WE COULD PING FROM NETWORK A TO B , BUT NOT TELNET TO A CERTAIN UNIX BOX ON NETWORK B, IS THIS AN ACCESS-LIST ISSUE OR IS IT AT THE UNIX BOX THAT IS NOT PERMITTING TELNET . Mo Durrani IS&T WYSE\EDS phone:408-473 1246 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: alitlle confused.
It depends Check if there is access-list on router that does not permit telnet to go through or Check the Unix box , and make sure it has telnetd --- Moahzam Durrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IF THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT NETWORKS A AND B , AND WE > COULD PING FROM NETWORK A > TO B , BUT NOT TELNET TO A CERTAIN UNIX BOX ON > NETWORK B, IS THIS AN > ACCESS-LIST ISSUE OR IS IT AT THE UNIX BOX THAT IS > NOT PERMITTING TELNET . > > Mo Durrani > IS&T > WYSE\EDS > phone:408-473 1246 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thought youd enjoy this
Heehee, well this gave me a laugh and I thought you guys might like it. Ive removed the name in case the person who needs a clue is around. xx wrote: > > what ro u mean > > --- Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > try using the internet. Youll be expected to. > > > > xx wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sir > > > I have mcse and ccna > > > now i am doing ccnp > > > ihope i will complete this within this month > > > i am from india and want to move to uk > > > can u tell me that i can find the job in uk eaisly > > or > > > not. > > > pls also let me that how much salary i can earn on > > the > > > bases of ccnp. > > > thanks. > > > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate!
Okay Pierre-Alex, here's my diagram: W A X (root bridge) - 2924XL (0/20 and 0/21) | | | | Y B Z (non-root bridge) - 1912 (0/26 and 0/27) You wrote: Changing the priority of port Y or Z (ports on the 1912) will have NO effect on the spanning tree. That's what I suspected when you first presented your problem when establishing a lower port priority on port Z (0/27) didn't result in 0/27 switching to forwarding mode with Y (0/26) being blocked upon reload of the switch. Radia's "Interconnections, Second Edition" led me to believe that you would have to lower the port priority on the 2924XL (0/21) rather than the 1912 but I tend to find sometimes her writing style difficult to understand. That's why I asked you to reset the port priorities on the 1912 and instead alter the port priorities on the 2924XL's 0/20 and 0/21 ports. Yes I know that you really only had to alter port priority on the port you wanted to be forwarding rather than blocking... but I thought I'd keep with your previous 1912 configuration methodology... Glad to know everything's now working! -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 15, 2001 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! Dear Anne, I can answer this question. :) Case Scenario: (You may want to draw as you go along...) Swith A is the root bridge, and Switch B is the non-root bridge Switch A is connected to Switch B via to links of equal cost. We will call the ports on Switch A: W and X, and the ports on Switch B:Y and Z W is connected to Y and X is connected to Z Changing the priority of port Y or Z will have NO effect on the spanning tree. However changing the the priority of W or X will cause the following: 1) If W is greater than X, then Z will be blocked 2) If X is greater than W, then Y will be blocked I tried many other case scenarios yesterday evening. I can summurize them as follows: 1) If the cost of link WY and the cost of link XZ are not equal, then cost IS the criteria for deciding which port will be blocked and no change of priority (on W, X , Y ,Z) is going to change the spanning tree 2) If the cost of link WY and the cost of link XZ are equal, then the priorities set by ports X and W of the root bridge will be the determining factors. 3) If the priority of link WY and the priority of link XZ are the same, the non root bridge will choose as the root port, the sending port that had the lowest mac address (If we assume that W has a lower mac address than X, then port Y will be the root port and port Z will be blocked) Did that fulfill some of your thurst for knowledge? :) Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:38 AM To: Pierre-Alex Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! By the way... if you've got a few moments, would you like to try something for me? At the bottom of my email, I wanted to know why setting the port priority didn't influence which port becomes blocked. If the path costs of 0/26 and 0/27 were identical, which port priority values need to be altered to influence spanning tree path selection? Is it port priority on the 1912 or the 2924XL? -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 15, 2001 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! "Why did yours reset to its original value while mine retained its new path cost? We're both running 9.00.04 code so I wouldn't suspect a bug to be the cause of the problem... One possibility may be that if you set your port path cost and then immediately reset your switch" This is precisely the mistake I made. While I figured it out, everything worked OK. Thanks again. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 6:58 PM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! "Once the root bridge has been selected, all bridges and switches in the network calculate the shortest path distance between itself and the root bridge. Each port sends a configuration BPDU message to determine the cost between itself and the root bridge. The port with the lowest cost is designated as the root port for the bridge. " On my Catalyst 1924-F-EN, I set the port cost of Ethernet 0/1 to 50 using the "spantree cost 50" command. I then typed reload. Once the switch was back up, I issued the command "show span". Results were: Port Ethernet 0/1 of VLAN1 is Forwarding Port path cost 50, Port priority 128 Why did yours reset to its original value while mine retained its new path cost? We're both running 9.00.04 code so I wouldn't suspect
Which Job Should I Take?
I was wondering if you all could share your opinions with me. I have a = choice of two jobs to take listed below. Both are an increase in pay of = about 9k. 1. My current Job: They are going to title me "network engineer" working = 4 10 hour days 1 pm to midnight ( I love the hours) , but we work with = cabletron, checkpoint and cisco. We have a campus and WAN support = responsibility. Sometimes it's a bit slow when nothing is happening and = I may get some "Win NT" duties, yuck I would have sunday, monday and = tuesdays off and could possibly get some good side gigs. Last but not = least, it's business casual. 2. New Job Offer: I will be titled a "network administrator" working 8 = to 5 monday through friday ( I hate waking up early ), but getting = exposure to ATM, Voice over IP and voice over ATM. Lots of MC 3810s = about 50 or so with conections all over the US. One thing is for sure is = there are NT admins to handle the "Win NT" issues, I really want to = graduate from the NT support world for good. This company is also = pre-ipo and although they are a huge company, this is a new "division" = and pre-ipo makes me nervous because I have a family to support. One = cool thing is that they are a cisco gold partner. One bad thing is that = they are business dress, yes the whole tie thing. The pre-ipo thing = makes me nervous because they say "yea when we go public, lots of the = big wigs will be rich"... Does this mean new management takeovers = etc...?? Anyway, thanks for any input... _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Thought youd enjoy this
What is wrong with someone asking a question of any kind? Do you spite someone for trying to improve themselves or give them encouragement to continue? Everyone needs a clue at some point in time. Hope to see your resume some time! Mark Krysinski CTO -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lauren Child Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Thought youd enjoy this Heehee, well this gave me a laugh and I thought you guys might like it. Ive removed the name in case the person who needs a clue is around. xx wrote: > > what ro u mean > > --- Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > try using the internet. Youll be expected to. > > > > xx wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sir > > > I have mcse and ccna > > > now i am doing ccnp > > > ihope i will complete this within this month > > > i am from india and want to move to uk > > > can u tell me that i can find the job in uk eaisly > > or > > > not. > > > pls also let me that how much salary i can earn on > > the > > > bases of ccnp. > > > thanks. > > > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAT/PAT port pass-through
I used PPTP for a VPN I just set up, but I was using a PIX, not a router. You'll probably need to get a higher level of IOS, one with encryption, which will allow you to do the vpdn commands for PPTP. I would suggest going to the below link to get an intro to the vpdn commands for PPTP setup: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v53/config/adv anced.htm#xtocid579420 I found it relatively easy to set up, considering this was my first time configuring a VPN. Also, I did get this to work with NAT, but according to CCO, it will not work with PAT. Good luck. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:NAT/PAT port pass-through Hi all, Im just experimenting with NAT/PAT and want to try to tunnel back to an internal NT server to establish a VPN with it. Say the internal address is 10.1.1.100 I want to pass all traffic from the external IP w.x.y.z(i s0) to internal 10.1.1.100(int e0) for the following ports Protocol ID TCP, Port 1723 Protocol ID 47, port all Can anyone help out with some config pointers? I've got NAT/PAT set up and working. I would like to use PPTP to the router and let the router establish the VPN but I don't think this router will support it. It is running 11.1(c1600-y-l.113-2) Any thoughts? Craig Lindstrom eSage http://www.eSage.com (801) 796-9595 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DB60 to RJ45 adapters?
For $63.95 I'd skip the adapters and get the real deal. Dan Pontrelli Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC CCNP, MCSE, CNA - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 7:14 AM Subject: Re: DB60 to RJ45 adapters? > I found the adapters at... > WWW.CSDATA.COM > > > > > > This message was sent by Cosmiverse. > http://www.cosmiverse.com > Get Your Free Email Account Today! > Join us Today as a Digital Passenger aboard > Cosmic Voyage 2000 ( http://www.cosmicvoyage2000.com )! > > > > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DB60 to RJ45 adapters?
You probably didn't finish reading the applications. Your are not limited to the distance of the cable you purchase. The real bagain comes in for sdlc environments. You replace the Cisco cable, 25 lead rs-232 cable and possibly any IBM cabling for controllers if required for the price of two adapters and a CAT 5 run. > For $63.95 I'd skip the adapters and get the real deal. > > Dan Pontrelli > Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC > CCNP, MCSE, CNA > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 7:14 AM > Subject: Re: DB60 to RJ45 adapters? > > > > I found the adapters at... > > WWW.CSDATA.COM > > > > > > > > > > > > This message was sent by Cosmiverse. > > http://www.cosmiverse.com > > Get Your Free Email Account Today! > > Join us Today as a Digital Passenger aboard > > Cosmic Voyage 2000 ( http://www.cosmicvoyage2000.com )! > > > > > > > > > This message was sent by Cosmiverse. http://www.cosmiverse.com Get Your Free Email Account Today! Join us Today as a Digital Passenger aboard Cosmic Voyage 2000 ( http://www.cosmicvoyage2000.com )! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which Job Should I Take?
I would also ask if either of these requires you to be "on call" 24/7. That would be a major factor for me. --- Traceroute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering if you all could share your opinions > with me. I have a = > choice of two jobs to take listed below. Both are an > increase in pay of = > about 9k. > > 1. My current Job: They are going to title me > "network engineer" working = > 4 10 hour days 1 pm to midnight ( I love the hours) > , but we work with = > cabletron, checkpoint and cisco. We have a campus > and WAN support = > responsibility. Sometimes it's a bit slow when > nothing is happening and = > I may get some "Win NT" duties, yuck I would > have sunday, monday and = > tuesdays off and could possibly get some good side > gigs. Last but not = > least, it's business casual. > > 2. New Job Offer: I will be titled a "network > administrator" working 8 = > to 5 monday through friday ( I hate waking up early > ), but getting = > exposure to ATM, Voice over IP and voice over ATM. > Lots of MC 3810s = > about 50 or so with conections all over the US. One > thing is for sure is = > there are NT admins to handle the "Win NT" issues, I > really want to = > graduate from the NT support world for good. This > company is also = > pre-ipo and although they are a huge company, this > is a new "division" = > and pre-ipo makes me nervous because I have a family > to support. One = > cool thing is that they are a cisco gold partner. > One bad thing is that = > they are business dress, yes the whole tie thing. > The pre-ipo thing = > makes me nervous because they say "yea when we go > public, lots of the = > big wigs will be rich"... Does this mean new > management takeovers = > etc...?? > > > Anyway, thanks for any input... > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = from The Big Lebowski... The Dude: You sure he won't mind? Bunny: Dieter doesn't care about anything. He's a nihilist. The Dude: Ohhh, that must be exhausting... __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Number of new CCIE's (off topic)
Sorry, I must rant. The Dr./lawyer analogy does not fly. If you could pay 100 bucks and be an M.D. or $200.00 to pass the bar without any real merit your damn right Doctors and Lawyers would be up in arms about it., they would be discussing and fighting all the way. Not to mention the patients and clients. I do agree however even in a situation such as this that if your good your good and people will see that and you will be paid and treated appropriatly. I also love it when one or 2 people decide what should or shouldn't be on a list they simply belong to with thousands of others who may be interested in discussing a topic related to Cisco Certification. A very valid concern in my mind. Instead of simply moving on you contribute to this supposed waste of bandwidth and time, and then on top of that to try and dictate what does or doesn't belong on the list. If this topic was not for you why not just pass it by or delete instead of participating in it only to tell all the others who have an interest that it does or does not belong on a list that is not yours. You can tell by the subject what it is about. move on. This is not specific to this thread, I have seen it many times. Sometimes things clearly are not on topic but it is still discussed without comment. This is very close to topic and although I agree that if your good your good and you don't have to worry many people would like to discuss it. Especially if Cisco really does open the flood gates. >-Original Message- >From: Rene Mendoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:04 PM >Subject: Re: Number of new CCIE's (off topic) > > >>Kenneth has read my mind exactly. This whole thread or future similar >types of >>threads do not belong here. We are wasting bandwidth and time replying to >these >>postings. Let's just keep concentrating on our studies please! >> >> >>Kenneth Sacca wrote: >> >>> Jeez this topic is boring and so out of touch with >>> reality. I bet most of the complainers here are >>> former MCSE, CNE, ASE, A+ and all of those other >>> certification holders. >>> >>> Your career isn't based on a certification. You >>> will never have a little fraternity of 5000 CCIEs >>> worldwide, where no one else can join the club. >>> Do you think lawyers or doctors write about this >>> crap all the time when a new class of people pass >>> the bar and medical board exams? Do CPAs complain >>> that the passing rate was 60% for their exam? Do >>> CEOs complain about each class that graduates from >>> Harvard Business school? >>> >>> What you do on the job matters. If you are good, >>> then the money will come. If you suck, no matter >>> what your cert, you will be paid what you are worth. >>> Excel individually as a person, and stop worrying >>> about this crap. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> > X-Originating-IP: [213.120.56.45] >>> > From: "Mark Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > Subject: RE: Number of new CCIE's (off topic) >>> > Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:07:40 >>> > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2001 17:07:40.0605 (UTC) >>> FILETIME=[CDCA26D0:01C09771] >>> > >>> > >>> > IF this is true, I'll be really pd off with Cisco - all that hard >work, >>> > and now the cert is going down the toilet. >>> > >>> > Mark >>> > CCIE#6280 >>> > >>> > >From: "Yurchenko, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > >Reply-To: "Yurchenko, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > >To: "'Jason T. Rohm'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"CCIELIST (E-mail)" >>> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > >Subject: RE: Number of new CCIE's (off topic) >>> > >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:27:33 -0500 >>> > > >>> > >Well, recently I have seen a post that all 5 individuals who attempted >the >>> > >test passed it successfully, and it looks like the rate at which the >new >>> > >CCIEs are being produced - close to 200 a month - would lead me to >believe >>> > >that we could possibly hit 1 by the end of the year. >>> > > >>> > >Michael Yurchenko >>> > >CCIE# 6695, CCDP, CCNP ATM Specialist, MCSE >>> > >Customer Support Engineer - 2 >>> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > >610-407-2154 >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >-Original Message- >>> > >From: Jason T. Rohm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> > >Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:16 AM >>> > >To: CCIELIST (E-mail) >>> > >Subject: Number of new CCIE's (off topic) >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >I just got my CCIE a few days ago and was disapointed at how easy the >test >>> > >was (by comparision to my other attempts). >>> > > >>> > >The raw number of new CCIE in the last few weeks seems to confirm that >the >>> > >new tests are infact easier than the old ones. >>> > > >>> > >While I am quite happy to have passed, I am also quite concerned that >the >>> > >number of CCIEs is going to double this year with the newly watered >down >>> > >tests and bigger labs. >>> > > >>> > >Does anyone else have a comment on this? >>> > > >>> > >Thank you, >>> > > >>> > >
RE: Which Job Should I Take?
I know what I would do, but that should not influate your decision. We all have different goals, and if you have a family to support, you should talk with them first before you make your choice. With a wife and kids there's big difference from working 9-5 to 1-midnight. You'll get used to the business dress very quickly, so don't let that scare you too much. A title is "just" a title, but maybe they would offer you a better one at your current job if you deside to go with the new one. I have no idea what pre-ipo means, so I can't guide you in that matter. Hth, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.CiscoKing.com NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: Traceroute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Which Job Should I Take? I was wondering if you all could share your opinions with me. I have a = choice of two jobs to take listed below. Both are an increase in pay of = about 9k. 1. My current Job: They are going to title me "network engineer" working = 4 10 hour days 1 pm to midnight ( I love the hours) , but we work with = cabletron, checkpoint and cisco. We have a campus and WAN support = responsibility. Sometimes it's a bit slow when nothing is happening and = I may get some "Win NT" duties, yuck I would have sunday, monday and = tuesdays off and could possibly get some good side gigs. Last but not = least, it's business casual. 2. New Job Offer: I will be titled a "network administrator" working 8 = to 5 monday through friday ( I hate waking up early ), but getting = exposure to ATM, Voice over IP and voice over ATM. Lots of MC 3810s = about 50 or so with conections all over the US. One thing is for sure is = there are NT admins to handle the "Win NT" issues, I really want to = graduate from the NT support world for good. This company is also = pre-ipo and although they are a huge company, this is a new "division" = and pre-ipo makes me nervous because I have a family to support. One = cool thing is that they are a cisco gold partner. One bad thing is that = they are business dress, yes the whole tie thing. The pre-ipo thing = makes me nervous because they say "yea when we go public, lots of the = big wigs will be rich"... Does this mean new management takeovers = etc...?? Anyway, thanks for any input... _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Thought youd enjoy this
I think you made it clear on "who needs a clue" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lauren Child Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Thought youd enjoy this Heehee, well this gave me a laugh and I thought you guys might like it. Ive removed the name in case the person who needs a clue is around. xx wrote: > > what ro u mean > > --- Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > try using the internet. Youll be expected to. > > > > xx wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sir > > > I have mcse and ccna > > > now i am doing ccnp > > > ihope i will complete this within this month > > > i am from india and want to move to uk > > > can u tell me that i can find the job in uk eaisly > > or > > > not. > > > pls also let me that how much salary i can earn on > > the _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: alternative to Cisco routers
Depends what you mean by "route." Linux, or other flavors of UNIX, work reasonably well in RsD route servers with huge routing tables, but limited numbers of peering interfaces and no forwarding requirements. In a small organization, these do not necessarily impose practical limits. The major limit there is the time and skill needed for support. Let's put it this way -- I am quite capable of designing routers. I use commercial routers in my home office simply because I have finite time, and I'd rather use my time for generating revenue than doing administration. I do administer my UNIX boxes, because I use them for development and it's productive for me to customize them. My environment includes Mac, Wintel, and Sun, because either someone supplies a particular platform and requires me to use it for their work, or that I made a certain decision in the past (with personal dollars) and found no compelling reason to discard a particular architecture. Conventional UNIX flavors are interrupt-driven. In general, real-time operating systems are run-to-completion, because at a certain real-time load (seen with forwarding, process control, etc.) the OS cost of servicing interrupts is too high. Yes, JunOS is a UNIX derivative, but with a radically rewritten kernel. Without any inside knowledge, I would suspect that an open implementation that resembles JunOS would be (at the lower levels) a pthreads interface to a Mach kernel. Again for large organizations, forwarding does lend itself to special hardware, or at least independent processors. There's no reason that the route processing for these couldn't live on UNIX/Linux. >Why would you not trust a Linux box to route? What experience or >documentation do you have that would lead you to believe that a properly >configured Linux box could not or would not do the job. There are a lot of >companies using Linux these days. One of largest distributed processing >systems is based on large linux clusters, most of Mariott's reservation >system is based on it. Lot's of ISP's use it as their core e-mail, and web >systems, and I have seen some departmental use of Linux or Windows NT >machines being used as routers. > >A cisco router is not that much different in architecture. At the highest >level, It is a processor that runs a unix kernel based OS with some NIC or >serial interfaces and an application designed specifically for routing. The >real difference is in the software that runs on the router. There is no >special ASIC's or processors on the router. IT is a computer (less intel >pentium processor except in the PIX) w/o the added multimedia and I/O >hardware, driven by a unix kernel running software , very similiar to any >other computer. The real difference is in the application, or software it >runs, not it's hardware architecure. > >My understanding is that some of the processors found in the router are the >same that can be found in certain Apple or Macintosh PC's and other >non-windows based cpu's. > > >This is my humble opinion based on my limited knowledge of the router >architecture. However I agree that it would not be appropriate to place a >linux box at the core of your network there are certainly times or >applications and solutions where it would be fine. It is not designed >specifically for routing, but it will certainly do the job if simple routing >is all that is needed. > > > >-Original Message- >From: William E. Gragido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: 'anthony kim' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 10:47 PM >Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers > > >>Are you serious? You would use a Linux box in place of a router Are you >>mad man? I mean, I am as much a fan of Linux as the next geek, however I >>would not entrust routing/switching duties to it. >> >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >>anthony kim >>Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 7:24 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: alternative to Cisco routers >> >> >>This is all well and good for the big time players, ISPs, big corps >>yadda yadda yadda, and companies with cash to burn like so much old toilet >>paper. The Small and Midsized Business market (SMB) almost always can >>accomplish what they want with free Unix or Linux for layer 3 and >>cheap stackable switches with or without 802.1q support. >> >>So my obligatory cisco alternative: >>www.zebra.org >> >>On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 04:00:36PM -0600, William E. Gragido wrote: >>>There ServerIronXL Layer 4-7 switches are pretty cool boxes as well. >>>Foundry is also pretty nice in that their command line interface is >awfully >>>reminiscent of Cisco's. The transition from one to the other should not >be >>>too difficult. >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Christopher Kolp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:41 PM >>>To: 'Brant Stevens'; 'William E. Gr
Re: Which Job Should I Take?
This is all going to come down to your personal preference. I would gather from your comments that you are leaning towards the first one. It sounds like the route I would go even though I would hate the shift it's still better than putting on a tie, but you stated you liked that shift so that would not be a problem for you. - Original Message - From: "Traceroute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 12:52 PM Subject: Which Job Should I Take? > I was wondering if you all could share your opinions with me. I have a = > choice of two jobs to take listed below. Both are an increase in pay of = > about 9k. > > 1. My current Job: They are going to title me "network engineer" working = > 4 10 hour days 1 pm to midnight ( I love the hours) , but we work with = > cabletron, checkpoint and cisco. We have a campus and WAN support = > responsibility. Sometimes it's a bit slow when nothing is happening and = > I may get some "Win NT" duties, yuck I would have sunday, monday and = > tuesdays off and could possibly get some good side gigs. Last but not = > least, it's business casual. > > 2. New Job Offer: I will be titled a "network administrator" working 8 = > to 5 monday through friday ( I hate waking up early ), but getting = > exposure to ATM, Voice over IP and voice over ATM. Lots of MC 3810s = > about 50 or so with conections all over the US. One thing is for sure is = > there are NT admins to handle the "Win NT" issues, I really want to = > graduate from the NT support world for good. This company is also = > pre-ipo and although they are a huge company, this is a new "division" = > and pre-ipo makes me nervous because I have a family to support. One = > cool thing is that they are a cisco gold partner. One bad thing is that = > they are business dress, yes the whole tie thing. The pre-ipo thing = > makes me nervous because they say "yea when we go public, lots of the = > big wigs will be rich"... Does this mean new management takeovers = > etc...?? > > > Anyway, thanks for any input... > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thought youd enjoy this
Perhaps you should make fun of me too. I think it's a reasonable question and I fail to see the humor. Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Heehee, well this gave me a laugh and I thought you guys might like it. > > Ive removed the name in case the person who needs a clue is around. > > xx wrote: > > > > what ro u mean > > > > --- Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > try using the internet. Youll be expected to. > > > > > > xx wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sir > > > > I have mcse and ccna > > > > now i am doing ccnp > > > > ihope i will complete this within this month > > > > i am from india and want to move to uk > > > > can u tell me that i can find the job in uk eaisly > > > or > > > > not. > > > > pls also let me that how much salary i can earn on > > > the > > > > bases of ccnp. > > > > thanks. > > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
affordable cisco switch
hello, Is anybody in the market to sell an affordable cisco switch. The only requirements are that it's in good working condition & the ports must be autosensing-capable. 24 ports would be preferrable. Please respond if you are willing to sell a switch. Thanks, __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no domain controller available
Hello, I have users at different buildings (on different subnets), when they move their laptop to another building, they have to do ip release/renew, otherwise, they won't get new ip address. Swithes are 5000/5500/6500. Port fast is already enabled. Anything needs to be done on PCs? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thought youd enjoy this
"Roberts, Timothy" wrote: > > Obviously english is not this persons first language. Why should this > person be made fun of because he has not fully mastered it yet? > He shouldnt. He should be made fun of for having an MCSE and CCNA, and working for CCNP, and not mastering the search engine. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Number of new CCIE's (off topic)
I do apologize to Rene as it would appear this rant is a direct result of his/her post. And the topic of the Group is Lab study so he/she is right. But there has to be some grey area right? I mean there are many off topic posts that generate some very good discussions. Although this one is off topic I think it has some real merit and should be watched closely. I was asked if I would stop persuing the CCIE if there was to many. No, but I would not persue it if it didn't mean much and it was terribly easy to pass. What would be the point. I am already very good at what I do so why persue it now? Because it is percieved as meaning you are on of the best. You are top-notch and know what you are talking about. It is the Ph.D of network certs. Of course that does not always apply to every individual, but that is how the CCIE is percieved. If it wasn't seen that way why would anyone want it? -Original Message- From: mtieast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:57 PM Subject: Fw: Number of new CCIE's (off topic) > > > >Sorry, I must rant. > >The Dr./lawyer analogy does not fly. If you could pay 100 bucks and be an >M.D. or $200.00 to pass the bar without any real merit your damn right >Doctors and Lawyers would be >up in arms about it., they would be discussing and fighting all the way. Not >to mention the patients and clients. I do agree however even in a situation >such as this that if your good your good and people will see that and you >will be paid and treated appropriatly. > >I also love it when one or 2 people decide what should or shouldn't be on a >list >they simply belong to with thousands of others who may be interested in >discussing a topic related to Cisco Certification. A very valid concern in >my mind. > > Instead of simply moving on you contribute to this supposed waste of >bandwidth and time, and then on top of that to try and dictate what does or >doesn't belong on the list. > >If this topic was not for you why not just pass it by or delete instead of >participating in it only to tell all the others who have an interest that it >does or does not belong >on a list that is not yours. > >You can tell by the subject what it is about. move on. > >This is not specific to this thread, I have seen it many times. Sometimes >things clearly are not on topic but it is still discussed without comment. >This is very close to topic and although I agree that if your good your good >and you don't have to worry many people would like to discuss it. Especially >if Cisco really does open the flood gates. > > > > > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Rene Mendoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Date: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:04 PM >>Subject: Re: Number of new CCIE's (off topic) >> >> >>>Kenneth has read my mind exactly. This whole thread or future similar >>types of >>>threads do not belong here. We are wasting bandwidth and time replying to >>these >>>postings. Let's just keep concentrating on our studies please! >>> >>> >>>Kenneth Sacca wrote: >>> Jeez this topic is boring and so out of touch with reality. I bet most of the complainers here are former MCSE, CNE, ASE, A+ and all of those other certification holders. Your career isn't based on a certification. You will never have a little fraternity of 5000 CCIEs worldwide, where no one else can join the club. Do you think lawyers or doctors write about this crap all the time when a new class of people pass the bar and medical board exams? Do CPAs complain that the passing rate was 60% for their exam? Do CEOs complain about each class that graduates from Harvard Business school? What you do on the job matters. If you are good, then the money will come. If you suck, no matter what your cert, you will be paid what you are worth. Excel individually as a person, and stop worrying about this crap. Regards > X-Originating-IP: [213.120.56.45] > From: "Mark Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Number of new CCIE's (off topic) > Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:07:40 > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2001 17:07:40.0605 (UTC) FILETIME=[CDCA26D0:01C09771] > > > IF this is true, I'll be really pd off with Cisco - all that hard >>work, > and now the cert is going down the toilet. > > Mark > CCIE#6280 > > >From: "Yurchenko, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Yurchenko, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "'Jason T. Rohm'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"CCIELIST >(E-mail)" > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: Number of new CCIE's (off topic) > >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:27:33 -0500 > > > >Well, recently I have seen a post that all 5 individuals who >attempted >>the > >test p
Re: Thought youd enjoy this
Perhaps they would like to respond back to this gentleman's e-mail in Swahili. Let's see if they can still walk with the shoe on the other foot. Kelly D Griffin, CCNA, CCDA Network Engineer Kg2 Network Design http://www.kg2.com - Original Message - From: "Chris Sees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 12:32 PM Subject: RE: Thought youd enjoy this > I think you made it clear on "who needs a clue" > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Lauren Child > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 12:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Thought youd enjoy this > > > Heehee, well this gave me a laugh and I thought you guys might like it. > > Ive removed the name in case the person who needs a clue is around. > > xx wrote: > > > > what ro u mean > > > > --- Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > try using the internet. Youll be expected to. > > > > > > xx wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sir > > > > I have mcse and ccna > > > > now i am doing ccnp > > > > ihope i will complete this within this month > > > > i am from india and want to move to uk > > > > can u tell me that i can find the job in uk eaisly > > > or > > > > not. > > > > pls also let me that how much salary i can earn on > > > the > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://1cis.com > Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes > 1st Class Internet Solutions http://1cis.com Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes 1st Class Internet Solutions _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
USER MODE PASSWORD!!!
I FOUND IT! Cisco1912(config)# enable secret level 1 cisco will require the password of "cisco" before allowing access to USER mode! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:50 PM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MORE TECHNICAL DETAILS ON PROBLEM SOLVED: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT : Think really hard. You CAN do it. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 13, 2001 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MORE TECHNICAL DETAILS ON PROBLEM SOLVED: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT : I think the answer to your question is no. The only password that you can set on the 1900 is the enable password/secret ... Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:09 PM To: Pierre-Alex; Dale Cunningham Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MORE TECHNICAL DETAILS ON PROBLEM SOLVED: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT : Pierre, I see that Jorge Moreira managed to answer your question about vty passwords on the Cisco Catalyst 1900 series switch. What threw me (and Rik as well) was your inclusion of "XL" after 1912--the Cisco Catalyst 1912 (and 1924) switches are not part of the XL series. I needed a few minutes to make sure that Cisco hadn't come out with a new XL series switch for which I was unaware before I re-responded to your query. As you've discovered, Jorge is correct--it's the "enable" password on the Catalyst 1900 series switch that is used to enable telnet access. But since we're discussing password usage on the 1900 series... here's a bit of a brainteaser for you, the answer for which I had included in last month's CCNA LAN Switching paper on CertificationZone: You'll notice that when you access your Catalyst switch via the console port, that without issuing any sort of password, you're immediately able to access several commands on the switch -- you've immediately got access to "user mode". In some organizations, this can present a security risk. Can you set a "user-mode" password for the Catalyst 1900 series switch? If so, how? -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 13, 2001 12:39 PM To: Dale Cunningham; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MORE TECHNICAL DETAILS ON PROBLEM SOLVED: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT : Hi all, Technically speaking, there is no such thing as a console password on version 9.00.04. of the catalyst 1912XL-EN. Although it is called a console password, it is really an enable password. Following are the steps that demonstrate this: 1) Erase nvram to start "fresh" 2) Type P to set the console password to cisco 3) Press K to enter the command line mode. You will be in enable mode WITHOUT any prompt for a password. 4) Now try to enter enable mode. You are required to enter a password. (cisco) 5) Go to config mode, set the enable password to demo, then exit 6) The next time you try to access the exec mode, the password that will let you in will be demo, NOT cisco. This proves that the console password is really an enable password. Trying to understand why the user mode is unprotected (no console password -strictly speaking) I typed ? at the user mode. This is what I got: >? Exec commands: enableTurn on privileged commands exit Exit from the EXEC help Description of the interactive help system ping Send echo messages session Tunnel to module show Show running system information terminal Set terminal line parameters At first sight it looks like there is nothing major that you could do with those commands, but if you explore the show options you will see at least 2 powerful commands: show ip and show cdp neighbors that could be used to document or hack into the network. CONCLUSION: The 1912 does not have a console password and since there is no good reason for this state of affair appropriate (physical) security measures should be taken to prevent unauthorized console access. Kind Regards to all, Pierre-Alex . Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:30 AM To: Dale Cunningham; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PROBLEM RESOLVED: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT : So, I found out the hard way that VERSION IOS version 9. of the 1912XL-EN switch does NOT have VTY LINES. It ONLY has a Console Line. As soon as I put the password on the Console line, I was able to telnet remotely to the switch. Thanks all for all helping, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:27 AM To: 'Pierre-Alex'; Dale Cunningham Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT!
RE: Thought you'd enjoy this (way off topic)
As a word of caution to all on the list, there are those who join these list to learn, brag, and look to hire. Also, when you post you are representing yourself to all on the list. When you post and your post includes a url where people can discover things about yourself. (I.E. when you piss someone off and they discover they know the supervisor your work for, such as, hummm, lets say Cable and Wireless) It is a small world. Instead of joking about someone, what can you learn from that person that could possibly make you more employable/valuable? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Sees Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Thought youd enjoy this I think you made it clear on "who needs a clue" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lauren Child Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Thought youd enjoy this Heehee, well this gave me a laugh and I thought you guys might like it. Ive removed the name in case the person who needs a clue is around. xx wrote: > > what ro u mean > > --- Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > try using the internet. Youll be expected to. > > > > xx wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sir > > > I have mcse and ccna > > > now i am doing ccnp > > > ihope i will complete this within this month > > > i am from india and want to move to uk > > > can u tell me that i can find the job in uk eaisly > > or > > > not. > > > pls also let me that how much salary i can earn on > > the _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccnp routing frames
At 10:19 AM 2/15/01, Robert Nickson wrote: >sorry for OSPF You should have left out that extra piece of information that the packets you mention are for OSPF, and anyone who didn't know that should go back to studying. &;-) This is an odd way of saying that you would have to know at least that much for the routing exam. You don't have to know the exact frame formats. It's must more important to understand the general principles of how OSPF routers become adjacent and synchronize their databases, and to be able to recognize the commonality in the frame formats. With regards to frame formats, I think you should know the following: OSPF runs directly above IP, using protocol type 89. (It does not use TCP or UDP.) OSPF packets have an IP TTL of 1. OSPF packets are sent to a reserved multicast address, either AllSPFRouters (224.0.0.5) or AllDRouters (224.0.0.6). Each OSPF packet type begins with an OSPF packet header. The Hello packet is used to find neighbors and detect problems. All the other packet types carry link-state advertisement information of some sort. The best book for describing what you should "really care about" when learning OSPF is Howard Berkowitz's "Designing Routing and Switching Architectures." I think he does a better job than Doyle in making sure the reader focuses on what really matters. And, as we know, he dispels urban myths with style and aplomb. Priscilla >-Original Message- >From: Robert Nickson >Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:10 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: ccnp routing frames > > >On the CCNP routing exam is there any questions on (i.e do i have to >memorise) >frame for frame the format of hello packets,DD packets,LSA packet >frames...etc >like ..version,type,packet length,route ID,Area ID,Checksum,Au >type,Authentication etc etc >or is there certain fields i should learn > >Any help would be useful Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP 2513 SCREWED UP !!!
Folks, I'am hoping someone can help here, I have 2 2513s in my lab with exactly this same amount of flash/memory 16/16 and IOS 12.0(6)IP feature set. I upgraded the first one to enterprise 12.0 using cisco's TFTP server on a pc, I then decided to upgrade the other one following a paper that I found here http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/fun_c/fcprt2/fcaddfun.htm I used the part where you configure the router with the IOS you need downloading as a TFTP server and the one to be upgraded as a client. It went on for hours with CCC on hyperterm and never came round, now when I boots it all it does is spew out C and I can't even break into it and I've search CCO. I will really appreciate you help if someone knows a link on CCO or else where. Thanks in advance = Michael Ibidunni __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which CVOICE book???
"Integrating Voice and Data Networks," by Scott Keagy. It's a book for engineers, not just test takers. If you like simple books that are thrown together as fast as possible to get market share, you might not like this book. But if you like books that are detailed, accurate, and relevant, this book is superb. Priscilla At 11:21 AM 2/15/01, Zabludovsky, Mark A wrote: >Hi Group, > Wanted to know which book/s I should read to prep for the CVOICE >specialization exam. I like Lammle's style of writing (understandable). I >don't just want to pass the test cause I think that voice is gonna be huge, >so I also want a book that will teach my what I need to know. Anybody that >has taken the test or read any of these books please help me out. I want to >place my order asap on the book. Thanks, > >Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNP, CCDA >Saint Gobain WAN Team >Cisco Network Specialist >Work: (610) 341-7678 >Mobile: (267) 981-1123 > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Which Job Should I Take?
Pre-IPO indicates the company has plans to go public (ie sell shares of the company on the stock market). This topic should also probably be moved to the jobs list. As far as the two job options, I'd chose the opportunity that will allow you to work with the technology you want to work with. These two jobs are very different from each other. I'd think the major decision would be "do I want to focus/pursue VoX technology?" That should make your decision fairly easy as in my experience you will either love the Voice arena or you will hate it. I'd say getting involved with the Voice arena has a high chance of getting you off the R&S studies. But on the other hand the Voice arena is getting huge! Opportunities are popping up left and right for people focused on Cisco AVVID technologies. I'd evaluate your interest in Voice and then make your decision based on that. Another side note, if you determine that you are in fact interested in pursuing Voice technology then I wouldn't worry about the company being pre-IPO. If they fail, and the department you work in gets cut, you will find getting another job dealing with Voice to be no problem. Remember, hours and dress are petty concerns compared to what you actually "do" for a living. HTH Best Regards, --Mike > -Original Message- > From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:22 AM > To: 'Traceroute'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Which Job Should I Take? > > > I know what I would do, but that should not influate your > decision. We all > have different goals, and if you have a family to support, > you should talk > with them first before you make your choice. With a wife and > kids there's > big difference from working 9-5 to 1-midnight. > > You'll get used to the business dress very quickly, so don't > let that scare > you too much. > > A title is "just" a title, but maybe they would offer you a > better one at > your current job if you deside to go with the new one. > > I have no idea what pre-ipo means, so I can't guide you in > that matter. > > Hth, > > Ole > > > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.CiscoKing.com > > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Traceroute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Which Job Should I Take? > > > I was wondering if you all could share your opinions with me. > I have a = > choice of two jobs to take listed below. Both are an increase > in pay of = > about 9k. > > 1. My current Job: They are going to title me "network > engineer" working = > 4 10 hour days 1 pm to midnight ( I love the hours) , but we > work with = > cabletron, checkpoint and cisco. We have a campus and WAN support = > responsibility. Sometimes it's a bit slow when nothing is > happening and = > I may get some "Win NT" duties, yuck I would have sunday, > monday and = > tuesdays off and could possibly get some good side gigs. Last > but not = > least, it's business casual. > > 2. New Job Offer: I will be titled a "network administrator" > working 8 = > to 5 monday through friday ( I hate waking up early ), but getting = > exposure to ATM, Voice over IP and voice over ATM. Lots of MC 3810s = > about 50 or so with conections all over the US. One thing is > for sure is = > there are NT admins to handle the "Win NT" issues, I really want to = > graduate from the NT support world for good. This company is also = > pre-ipo and although they are a huge company, this is a new > "division" = > and pre-ipo makes me nervous because I have a family to support. One = > cool thing is that they are a cisco gold partner. One bad > thing is that = > they are business dress, yes the whole tie thing. The pre-ipo thing = > makes me nervous because they say "yea when we go public, > lots of the = > big wigs will be rich"... Does this mean new management takeovers = > etc...?? > > > Anyway, thanks for any input... > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thought youd enjoy this
In my opinion this guy should not be made fun of AT ALL. Why do you take it for granted that this guy has internet access whenever he wants it? While we are at it , the cisco website can answer most questions asked on this list, does that make people who ask foolish? I think not. I think it does no harm to assume the next guy has some intelligence Nnanna --- Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Roberts, Timothy" wrote: > > > > Obviously english is not this persons first language. Why should > this > > person be made fun of because he has not fully mastered it yet? > > > > He shouldnt. He should be made fun of for having an MCSE and CCNA, > and > working for CCNP, and not mastering the search engine. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Nnanna Obuba CCIE # 6586 www.nantech.com Online lab for CCIE preparation __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Equipment
Hello Gang, I am looking for 25xx/26xx series routers & 2901 switch. Any seller on the list, if so, contact me directly. Thanks RamanG _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting another vendor's switch to Cisco's
We have a partner company that needs to do some heavy duty testing relating to the network. We currently have them on a Cisco 3548XL switch. They would like to buy a generic switch that has some gigabit ports and then create a channel to the Cisco switch with 4 ports. Would this be possible? How does Cisco's equipment play wth others? Thanks, Jeff _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Thought youd enjoy this
Lauren, I don't think it had anything to do with a search engine. If I may correct his poor english skills, it sounds like: >To Whom It Concerns, > >I currently hold MCSE and CCNA certification, and am finishing my CCNP >shortly. I am a citizen in India and would like to relocate to the UK if >possible. > >In your opinion, what is the job market for a person such as myself? >Also, I'm sure the salary over there is different than here, what would I >be looking at? > >Thank you. Am I wrong?? ck > > > Dear Sir > > > I have mcse and ccna > > > now i am doing ccnp > > > ihope i will complete this within this month > > > i am from india and want to move to uk > > > can u tell me that i can find the job in uk eaisly > > or > > > not. > > > pls also let me that how much salary i can earn on > > the > > > bases of ccnp. > > > thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lauren Child Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Roberts, Timothy Subject: Re: Thought youd enjoy this "Roberts, Timothy" wrote: > > Obviously english is not this persons first language. Why should this > person be made fun of because he has not fully mastered it yet? > He shouldnt. He should be made fun of for having an MCSE and CCNA, and working for CCNP, and not mastering the search engine. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Connecting another vendor's switch to Cisco's
I can tell you from personal experience that Extreme Networks works well with Cisco gear. The only problems we have had are on multicast version compatibility, but even that was worked out. Kelly D Griffin, CCNA, CCDA Network Engineer Kg2 Network Design http://www.kg2.com - Original Message - From: "Jeff Walzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Cisco'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:19 PM Subject: Connecting another vendor's switch to Cisco's > We have a partner company that needs to do some heavy duty testing relating > to the network. We currently have them on a Cisco 3548XL switch. They would > like to buy a generic switch that has some gigabit ports and then create a > channel to the Cisco switch with 4 ports. Would this be possible? How does > Cisco's equipment play wth others? > > Thanks, > Jeff > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://1cis.com > Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes > 1st Class Internet Solutions http://1cis.com Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes 1st Class Internet Solutions _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco secure policy manager
Will not work with 2000 Regards, Manny Colon Computer Services Information Builders Inc. ML wrote: > Anyone try running CSPM on a Windows 2000 box. Let me know how it worked. > > THanks, > ML > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: alternative to Cisco routers
How is current layer 3 switching any different from routing? I believe your concern would lie with forwarding performance? *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 2/14/2001 at 10:43 PM Kenneth wrote: >You obviously can't do layer 3 SWITCHING with a box loaded with Linux. It >might do routing but definitely can't be used in an enterprise nor an ISP. > >anthony kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> This is all well and good for the big time players, ISPs, big corps >> yadda yadda yadda, and companies with cash to burn like so much old toilet >> paper. The Small and Midsized Business market (SMB) almost always can >> accomplish what they want with free Unix or Linux for layer 3 and >> cheap stackable switches with or without 802.1q support. >> >> So my obligatory cisco alternative: >> www.zebra.org >> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 04:00:36PM -0600, William E. Gragido wrote: >> >There ServerIronXL Layer 4-7 switches are pretty cool boxes as well. >> >Foundry is also pretty nice in that their command line interface is >awfully >> >reminiscent of Cisco's. The transition from one to the other should not >be >> >too difficult. >> > >> >-Original Message- >> >From: Christopher Kolp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:41 PM >> >To: 'Brant Stevens'; 'William E. Gragido'; 'Howard C. Berkowitz'; >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers >> > >> > >> >Foundry prices are killer and the performance is top notch. >> > >> >We're planning a roll out with 40 OC-12 POS. Guess who our preferred >> >provider is? >> > >> >None other than foundry. >> > >> >-ck >> > >> > >> > >> >-Original Message- >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >> >Brant Stevens >> >Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 4:28 PM >> >To: William E. Gragido; 'Howard C. Berkowitz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers >> > >> > >> >Not to mention Foundry... >> > >> >Brant I. Stevens >> >Internetwork Solutions Engineer >> >Thrupoint, Inc. >> >545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor >> >New York, NY. 10017 >> >646-562-6540 >> > >> >-Original Message- >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >> >William E. Gragido >> >Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:47 PM >> >To: 'Howard C. Berkowitz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers >> > >> > >> >Riding on the coat tails of Howard's comments, there are also other >players >> >out there like Lucent(home of the Nexibit N64000 Terabit Switch Router >and >> >the Ascend product lines), Avici, Charlette's Web, Nortel etc., that >offer >> >carrier grade solutions. >> > >> >-Original Message- >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >> >Howard C. Berkowitz >> >Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 1:20 PM >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: Re: alternative to Cisco routers >> > >> > >> >A few comments, in which I think I am being reasonably objective. >> > >> >On this list, people periodically speak of the joys of Cisco, because >> >it offers end-to-end solutions. That is a very enterprise-oriented >> >view. >> > >> >Much more than in the enterprise space, carriers/ISPs tend to _want_ >> >multivendor solutions. There are several reasons. They are >> >protected, to some extent, from bugs in the hardware or software of a >> >specific implementation. Next, if they have several qualified >> >vendors, they can get some protection against delivery backlogs from >> >one of them. The larger provider also can play competitive discount >> >and service games with the vendors. >> > >> >In this market, Juniper has the advantage of having built a product >> >as carrier-oriented from the ground up. There's a lot of bloat in IOS >> >due to the perception or need for legacy, usually >> >enterprise-oriented, features. Independent reviewers, such as the >> >Tolly group, have indicated that Junipers may have as good or better >> >throughput than equivalent Cisco products. >> > >> >No one vendor owns the entire carrier router space. Cisco's >> >advertising that ninety-some percent of the traffic in the internet >> >goes over the equipment of one company doesn't necessarily mean the >> >core bandwidth, but that the traffic at some point hits an enterprise >> >or carrier Cisco device. In any case, I prefer the variant of this >> >slogan I saw in someone's .sig (hoping I don't hit a filter) >> >"ninety-some percent of the p*rn*graphy in the Internet goes through >> >the equipment of one company." Said comment could be equally true of >> >Cisco's routers or Nortel's optics. >> > >> >Juniper and Cisco both make fine products. >> > >> > >> >>John, >> >> >> >>I went to a BGP study session and the instructor said that major ISP use >> >>Juniper router to run BGP. Hope this help. PEACE >> >> >> >> >> >>Raheem >> >> >> >> >> >>>From: John C
Passed BSCN
Hey all, Passed BSCN 2.0 today with an 896. Pretty surprised at relative low difficulty of most of the questions. Any recommendations on which test should be next? Christopher Supino Senior Systems Engineer, CCNA, MCSE, Novell CNA, Compaq ASE TransNet Corp. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Which Job Should I Take?
"Pre-IPO" in our current market could mean you might strike it rich over night over looking for a new job the next day. I tend to be more of a traditionalist and stick with estabilished companies, but there is something to say for sticking your neck out. No matter what, have a back up plan. Denis I have no idea what pre-ipo means, so I can't guide you in that matter. Hth, Ole _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Thought youd enjoy this
As do I. Granted, english is my first language, and I tend to pick this stuff up pretty easily, but there are hundreds of times where I looked around the cisco site and didn't find anything only to ask the list and have an answer within a few minutes. Denis Denis A. Baldwin - Network Administrator A+ / Network + / I-Net+ / MCP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lurker Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Thought youd enjoy this Perhaps you should make fun of me too. I think it's a reasonable question and I fail to see the humor. Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Heehee, well this gave me a laugh and I thought you guys might like it. > > Ive removed the name in case the person who needs a clue is around. > > xx wrote: > > > > what ro u mean > > > > --- Lauren Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > try using the internet. Youll be expected to. > > > > > > xx wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sir > > > > I have mcse and ccna > > > > now i am doing ccnp > > > > ihope i will complete this within this month > > > > i am from india and want to move to uk > > > > can u tell me that i can find the job in uk eaisly > > > or > > > > not. > > > > pls also let me that how much salary i can earn on > > > the > > > > bases of ccnp. > > > > thanks. > > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tragedy of the Commons (was Thought youd enjoy this
There's a basic concept in economic theory called the "tragedy of the commons." The commons, in this case, was a shared pasture in which the village livestock could graze. As long as the number of cattle fit the basic needs of each family, the commons provided enough grazing land for all. But less cooperative people decided that they could increase their personal profits by having more cows and sheep. Nothing wrong with that -- except the also expected to pasture them on the common land, rather than set up private pastures for private herds and flocks. The commons, however, had just so much capacity, and, when it was overgrazed by the additional beasts, the grass could no longer recover, and the entire resource died. Nothing could graze any longer. Information based on people's time is a modern version. It takes time to scan a list for irrelevant messages, especially when people don't use informative subject headings. Outside North America, there is often a monetary cost to downloading more and more material that may not be of interest. So yes -- when people ask questions that could be answered with reasonable use of a search engine, I get a bit annoyed. CCO, I realize, can be uncooperative, and I am sympathetic to people who say "I tried to find this on CCO but didn't get anything useful." There is no question that I'm usually rude to telemarketers. Sometimes, they whine that they won't take much of my time. But I really try to create a hostile work environment for telemarketers, because if encouraged, they will waste so much of my time that I won't be able to earn money to buy their products. Hopefully, my parable may convey something about effective and fair use of lists. >Lauren Child wrote, >"Roberts, Timothy" wrote: > > >> Obviously english is not this persons first language. Why should this >> person be made fun of because he has not fully mastered it yet? >> > >He shouldnt. He should be made fun of for having an MCSE and CCNA, and >working for CCNP, and not mastering the search engine. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DB60 to RJ45 adapters?
They are a little expensive compared to generic DCE to DTE cables but you could use these and put them in a standard RJ45 patch panel. This would make swapping lab topologies around very easy. Brian Dennis CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DB60 to RJ45 adapters? For $63.95 I'd skip the adapters and get the real deal. Dan Pontrelli Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC CCNP, MCSE, CNA - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 7:14 AM Subject: Re: DB60 to RJ45 adapters? > I found the adapters at... > WWW.CSDATA.COM > > > > > > This message was sent by Cosmiverse. > http://www.cosmiverse.com > Get Your Free Email Account Today! > Join us Today as a Digital Passenger aboard > Cosmic Voyage 2000 ( http://www.cosmicvoyage2000.com )! > > > > ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: no domain controller available
Jim, You could set up VMPS and VTP to solve the problem. The campus-wide VLAN model provides the flexibility to have statically configured end stations move to a different floor or building within the campus. Cisco's VLAN Membership Policy Server (VMPS) and the VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) make this possible. For example, a mobile user plugs a laptop PC into a LAN port in another building. The local Catalyst switch sends a query to the VMPS to determine the access policy and VLAN membership for the user. Then the Catalyst switch adds the user's port to the appropriate VLAN. - raj "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > I have users at different buildings (on different > subnets), when they move their laptop to another > building, they have to do ip release/renew, otherwise, > they won't get new ip address. Swithes are > 5000/5500/6500. Port fast is already enabled. Anything > needs to be done on PCs? > > Thanks in advance. > > > Jim > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccnp routing frames
>At 10:19 AM 2/15/01, Robert Nickson wrote: >>sorry for OSPF > >You should have left out that extra piece of information that the packets >you mention are for OSPF, and anyone who didn't know that should go back to >studying. &;-) This is an odd way of saying that you would have to know at >least that much for the routing exam. You don't have to know the exact >frame formats. It's must more important to understand the general >principles of how OSPF routers become adjacent and synchronize their >databases, and to be able to recognize the commonality in the frame formats. I'll have a "metapaper" about link state routing protocols appearing shortly at CertZone (I think March 1), which identifies the general principles that apply to both OSPF and ISIS. There will be a series of more detailed papers following, on both single area and hierarchical OSPF and ISIS. > >With regards to frame formats, I think you should know the following: > >OSPF runs directly above IP, using protocol type 89. (It does not use TCP >or UDP.) > >OSPF packets have an IP TTL of 1. > >OSPF packets are sent to a reserved multicast address, either AllSPFRouters >(224.0.0.5) or AllDRouters (224.0.0.6). > >Each OSPF packet type begins with an OSPF packet header. 5 packet types, all but hello carrying one or more Link State Advertisements (LSA). One thing that can really be confusing is that one of the packet types is Link State Acknowledgement. This packet is usually abbreviated LSAck to avoid conflict with LSA. A LSAck can carry one or more LSA headers (LSA's have both fixed-length headers and variable-length specific information). > >The Hello packet is used to find neighbors and detect problems. > >All the other packet types carry link-state advertisement information of >some sort. There are about a dozen LSA types. Some (e.g., type 6 and type 8) are not used by Cisco. Others (type 9 and above) are still experimental or used in new technologies such as OSPF traffic engineering. For general consumption, know about 1-5 and 7. > >The best book for describing what you should "really care about" when >learning OSPF is Howard Berkowitz's "Designing Routing and Switching >Architectures." I think he does a better job than Doyle in making sure the >reader focuses on what really matters. And, as we know, he dispels urban >myths with style and aplomb. > >Priscilla I can't help but giggle a bit here. I was the reviewer for Jeff's OSPF chapter, and he reviewed some of my CertZone BGP papers. We hold each other in high respect, I believe, but we have different writing styles. Jeff, for example, feels that it's valuable to quote a lot of RFC-ish material at the start of a chapter, to establish precision for the discussion in the latter part of the chapter. It's probably fair to say that his mental model is more bottom-up/synthetic than mine, which is more top-down/analytic. As far as urban myth dispelling, I can't help but wonder if aplombing is one of the characteristics of a roto-router. Apologies to those outside North America for the regional reference. When I wrote the Designing Routing and Switching Book, I was concentrating neither on configuration and troubleshooting (more Jeff's focus) nor why various alternative choices were made in the protocol itself (see John Moy's and Radia Perlman's books). I may be submitting some proposed extensions to OSPF to the IETF, but then I will be wearing my protocol architect hat, which is different from my network architect hat. > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Robert Nickson >>Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:10 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: ccnp routing frames >> >> >>On the CCNP routing exam is there any questions on (i.e do i have to >>memorise) >>frame for frame the format of hello packets,DD packets,LSA packet >>frames...etc >>like ..version,type,packet length,route ID,Area ID,Checksum,Au >>type,Authentication etc etc >>or is there certain fields i should learn >> >>Any help would be useful > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: alternative to Cisco routers
yea, point taken, but I wouldn't want a router that's slow or unreliable either... --- Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A router is a device that routes layer 3 packets. > > Doesn't matter if it's fast or slow, reliable or > not. > > John Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > On May 31, 8:23pm, anthony kim wrote: > > } --- John Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > } > On Jul 7, 4:07am, "Fowler, Robert J." wrote: > > } > } > > } > } However it might be a good choice for > someone who is building a > > } > home lab. It > > } > } is much cheaper to piece together some > computers and throw zebra > > } > on it than > > } > } to buy several routers. I've never used > Zebra but it sounds like > > } > if you had > > } > } some existing equipment and wanted to expand > on that, couldn't > > } > afford to buy > > } > } another router but had some old PC's it > would be the way to go, > > } > since > > } > } speed/reliability wouldn't be a real factor > in a home lab. Any > > } > thoughts? > > } > > > } > Although, you may learn something about > the protocols, you > > } > won't > > } > learn anything about real routers. You > definitely need to get > > } > hands on > > } > with real routers. Zebra could be used to > simulate a secondary > > } > router > > } > in a multi-router experiment, but it isn't > sufficient by itself. > > } > > } Is a real router a device which routes layer 3 > packets? Or a device > > } "specifically designed" to route layer 3 > packets. Your statement > > } implies the latter. Whereas I believe the > former. > > > > The latter. A PC make be able to route > packets, but that doesn't > > make it a real router. The hardware device is > going to be faster > > (especially at the high end), more reliable, > require much less > > maintenance (which makes it cheaper in the long > run), and easier to > > install and setup (not to mention take up far less > space). I'm a huge > > fan of UNIX and will tend to run just about > everything on UNIX systems, > > but even I realise that UNIX host based systems > are not the correct > > solution for every problem. > > > > } You *will* learn about real routers because the > pc is a real router. > > } You may *not learn* anything about IOS or > $VENDOR's routers. > > > > That is the purpose of getting Cisco certs... > > > > }-- End of excerpt from anthony kim > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = from The Big Lebowski... The Dude: You sure he won't mind? Bunny: Dieter doesn't care about anything. He's a nihilist. The Dude: Ohhh, that must be exhausting... __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: no domain controller available
Jim, Also look at these links they may help. The Basics http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/rtrmgmt/cw2000/fam_prod/user _reg/2_0/urt20/useguide/urt_bscs.htm Planning for User Registration http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/rtrmgmt/cw2000/fam_prod/user _reg/1_2_1/use_reg/ur1plan.htm - raj "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > I have users at different buildings (on different > subnets), when they move their laptop to another > building, they have to do ip release/renew, otherwise, > they won't get new ip address. Swithes are > 5000/5500/6500. Port fast is already enabled. Anything > needs to be done on PCs? > > Thanks in advance. > > > Jim > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Space Phone
Cool! Just like the movie "2001: A Space Odyssey!" By the way, for live coverage of NASA activities, see this link: http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/realdata/nasatv/index.html Priscilla At 10:37 AM 2/15/01, Buri, Heather H wrote: >Here it is: > >- Original Message - >From: "Will Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: >Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 9:15 AM >Subject: Is this COOL or what? Cisco Space Phones! > > > > Enjoy the read!! > > > > > > >>Yesterday, at approximately 4:09 PM Central, the first phone call from > > space was made. Astronaut Marsha Ivin, using a Cisco IP SoftPhone on the > > Space Shuttle Atlantis, made the first and second telephone calls EVER >from > > space. > > >> > > >> > > >>NASA has had CallManager software in a development lab since prior to > > the Selsius acquisition by Cisco. The Selsius, and now second-generation > > Cisco phones, have been unusually tolerant to the satellite delay between > > Mission Control in Houston and the Shuttle. Brett Parrish, lead NASA > > engineer on this project, holds our CallManager software in very high > > regard, especially since finding it works over satellite delay without > > modification between our hardware-based phones (tested to up to 1.2 >seconds > > of delay). Brett has stated that it is very unusual for an application to > > work out of the box with this type of delay. > > >> > > >> > > >>Since certification for flight is an extremely long and, at times, > > extremely political process, NASA decided to use SoftPhone for the first > > trial. The main reason for this is that the laptop PCs used by NASA > > astronauts have already been certified, and getting a software process in > > flight is much easier than launching hardware. Extensive testing was > > performed at NASA using custom-built equipment to replicate the delays and > > > LOS (Loss Of Signal) conditions common with the Space Shuttle. Minor > > modifications were made to CallManager (inclusion of a service parameter) > > and to SoftPhone (change in the order of events for call acceptance) by > > Cisco development to address TAPI issues with delay, and SoftPhone was > > approved for a trial flight. Unfortunately, this was not an official goal > > of the Space Shuttle Atlantis, which simply meant testing was not > > scheduled, and not guaranteed. Despite the lack of official stature for > > this test, optimism that SoftPhone would be tested was very high as the > > Astronauts had seen the application and were demanding that it fly with >the > > Shuttle. Imagine being out in space with no way to call home! Imagine >being > > IN space and being able to make a normal phone call anywhere! Despite all > > the technological advances, separation is very apparent when out in space. > > > Never has an Astronaut been able to pick up a phone and place a call. > > >> > > >> > > >>At approximately 4:00PM Central the opportunity to make a call using >the > > Cisco IP SoftPhone became available. Marsha Ivin, with a brief break in > > official tasks, asked Space Command if there was time to try the IP > > SoftPhone. The Flight Commander gave the go-ahead and the test was on!. > > Marsha booted up the SoftPhone and at approximately 4:09PM made a call to > > the Flight Director. The call went from her SoftPhone software through a > > VG-200 gateway, over an FXO port, through a PBX to the phone on the Flight > > > Director s desk. They held a long and animated conversation (though what > > was actually discussed is unknown) and at the end Marsha was granted > > permission to call one of the 7960 phones in the POC (Payload Operations > > Center). She made the call and it was answered by Brett Parrish. Marsha > > asked So how do you like getting the second ever call from space? . After > > speaking with Brett, Steve Schadelbauer of NASA was put on the line and he > > > spoke with Marsha. The conversations with Marsha lasted for several > > minutes. Both Brett and Steve commented at how clear the conversation was > > much better than the audio quality found on the radio conversations with > > the Shuttle. > > >> > > >> > > >>It was amazing at how much of a non-event this was. History in the > > making but no scrambling, no trouble-shooting. IT JUST WORKS !!! Most of > > the credit goes to Brett and Steve for their tireless testing and > > replication of the Shuttle s environment. On the other hand, this is truly > > > an illustration of how Cisco s IP Telephony makes geographic location > > irrelevant to audio communications. Anywhere, and that means ANYWHERE, you > > > have IP connectivity you have a COMMUNICATIONS network, which includes > > telephony. The network works, no excuses! > > >> > > >> > > >>This is a tribute to many things. Brett and Steve put our software and > > hardware through the ringer at NASA subjecting it to delay, loss of >signal, > > and bit error rates well above what would be found even between Mission > > Control and the Shuttle. As a result, this hi
Re: Thought youd enjoy this
Christopher Kolp wrote: > > Lauren, > > I don't think it had anything to do with a search engine. > > If I may correct his poor english skills, it sounds like: > I dont know about you but Id say that - > > > > can u tell me that i can find the job in uk eaisly > > > or > > > > not. > > > > pls also let me that how much salary i can earn on > > > the > > > > bases of ccnp. sounds remarkedly like asking me to do his boring work for him. Ive helped other people with career issues before, but I dont like being taken for granted or treated as google. Hes a lazy twonk reguardless of where hes from. Anyhows, thats it Im ignoring any more emails justifying someone who just assumed Id give him all the info he needed without him having to lift a finger. Hes supposed to be an engineer. And I and a number of others found it funny that hed actually got that many certs while remaining fundamentally crap. TTFN Lauren _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate!
You are Brilliant! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leigh Anne Chisholm Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:45 AM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! Okay Pierre-Alex, here's my diagram: W A X (root bridge) - 2924XL (0/20 and 0/21) | | | | Y B Z (non-root bridge) - 1912 (0/26 and 0/27) You wrote: Changing the priority of port Y or Z (ports on the 1912) will have NO effect on the spanning tree. That's what I suspected when you first presented your problem when establishing a lower port priority on port Z (0/27) didn't result in 0/27 switching to forwarding mode with Y (0/26) being blocked upon reload of the switch. Radia's "Interconnections, Second Edition" led me to believe that you would have to lower the port priority on the 2924XL (0/21) rather than the 1912 but I tend to find sometimes her writing style difficult to understand. That's why I asked you to reset the port priorities on the 1912 and instead alter the port priorities on the 2924XL's 0/20 and 0/21 ports. Yes I know that you really only had to alter port priority on the port you wanted to be forwarding rather than blocking... but I thought I'd keep with your previous 1912 configuration methodology... Glad to know everything's now working! -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 15, 2001 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! Dear Anne, I can answer this question. :) Case Scenario: (You may want to draw as you go along...) Swith A is the root bridge, and Switch B is the non-root bridge Switch A is connected to Switch B via to links of equal cost. We will call the ports on Switch A: W and X, and the ports on Switch B:Y and Z W is connected to Y and X is connected to Z Changing the priority of port Y or Z will have NO effect on the spanning tree. However changing the the priority of W or X will cause the following: 1) If W is greater than X, then Z will be blocked 2) If X is greater than W, then Y will be blocked I tried many other case scenarios yesterday evening. I can summurize them as follows: 1) If the cost of link WY and the cost of link XZ are not equal, then cost IS the criteria for deciding which port will be blocked and no change of priority (on W, X , Y ,Z) is going to change the spanning tree 2) If the cost of link WY and the cost of link XZ are equal, then the priorities set by ports X and W of the root bridge will be the determining factors. 3) If the priority of link WY and the priority of link XZ are the same, the non root bridge will choose as the root port, the sending port that had the lowest mac address (If we assume that W has a lower mac address than X, then port Y will be the root port and port Z will be blocked) Did that fulfill some of your thurst for knowledge? :) Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:38 AM To: Pierre-Alex Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! By the way... if you've got a few moments, would you like to try something for me? At the bottom of my email, I wanted to know why setting the port priority didn't influence which port becomes blocked. If the path costs of 0/26 and 0/27 were identical, which port priority values need to be altered to influence spanning tree path selection? Is it port priority on the 1912 or the 2924XL? -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 15, 2001 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! "Why did yours reset to its original value while mine retained its new path cost? We're both running 9.00.04 code so I wouldn't suspect a bug to be the cause of the problem... One possibility may be that if you set your port path cost and then immediately reset your switch" This is precisely the mistake I made. While I figured it out, everything worked OK. Thanks again. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 6:58 PM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DISTURBING: Spanning Tree Protocol Refuses to Cooperate! "Once the root bridge has been selected, all bridges and switches in the network calculate the shortest path distance between itself and the root bridge. Each port sends a configuration BPDU message to determine the cost between itself and the root bridge. The port with the lowest cost is designated as the root port for the bridge. " On my Catalyst 1924-F-EN, I set the port cost of Ethernet 0/1 to 50 using the "spantree cost 50" command. I then typed reload. O
Lab Date Swap
I have a lab scheduled in San Jose for March 12. I am willing to swap with anyone(in San Jose or RTP) for an April, May, or early June date. Please let me know --WW _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which Job Should I Take?
I took a pre-ipo offer with 2000 shares of non-existent stock. Unfortunately it was a .com that started a year before the .com crash Looking back I don't regret it though. I got a ton of experience setting up frame-relay circuits, firewalls, and all other network administration. It all has to balance out with what you enjoy doing, the stability of the company (layoffs or shutdowns are possible in pre-ipo), and of course..$$. - Original Message - From: "Denis A. Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ole Drews Jensen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Traceroute'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:54 PM Subject: RE: Which Job Should I Take? > "Pre-IPO" in our current market could mean you might strike it rich over > night over looking for a new job the next day. I tend to be more of a > traditionalist and stick with estabilished companies, but there is something > to say for sticking your neck out. No matter what, have a back up plan. > > Denis > > I have no idea what pre-ipo means, so I can't guide you in that matter. > > Hth, > > Ole > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tragedy of the Commons (was Thought youd enjoy this
I read a bit of callousness in Lauren's approach, but I agree with the general idea Lauren proposes. I have sent out similar emails to people who waste my time, instead of doing a bit of research. I also oppose the use of "shorthand" english in public emails. It is offputting, so I tend to ignore those people entirely. But, Howard, aren't you being a little too cryptic? The commons obviously is the listserv. But who are putting too many sheep out? Lauren (and me, I guess, by association with that point of view), or all the others who criticize? Or both sides? I agree, it is time to end this thread. Ray Mosely CCNA, MCSE BTW, Howard, our first communiques ended up with you bashing me. Thank you, sincerely, because I was humbled. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tragedy of the Commons (was Thought youd enjoy this There's a basic concept in economic theory called the "tragedy of the commons." The commons, in this case, was a shared pasture in which the village livestock could graze. As long as the number of cattle fit the basic needs of each family, the commons provided enough grazing land for all. But less cooperative people decided that they could increase their personal profits by having more cows and sheep. Nothing wrong with that -- except the also expected to pasture them on the common land, rather than set up private pastures for private herds and flocks. The commons, however, had just so much capacity, and, when it was overgrazed by the additional beasts, the grass could no longer recover, and the entire resource died. Nothing could graze any longer. Information based on people's time is a modern version. It takes time to scan a list for irrelevant messages, especially when people don't use informative subject headings. Outside North America, there is often a monetary cost to downloading more and more material that may not be of interest. So yes -- when people ask questions that could be answered with reasonable use of a search engine, I get a bit annoyed. CCO, I realize, can be uncooperative, and I am sympathetic to people who say "I tried to find this on CCO but didn't get anything useful." There is no question that I'm usually rude to telemarketers. Sometimes, they whine that they won't take much of my time. But I really try to create a hostile work environment for telemarketers, because if encouraged, they will waste so much of my time that I won't be able to earn money to buy their products. Hopefully, my parable may convey something about effective and fair use of lists. >Lauren Child wrote, >"Roberts, Timothy" wrote: > > >> Obviously english is not this persons first language. Why should this >> person be made fun of because he has not fully mastered it yet? >> > >He shouldnt. He should be made fun of for having an MCSE and CCNA, and >working for CCNP, and not mastering the search engine. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: USER MODE PASSWORD!!!
Congratulations Pierre-Alex, you're really on a roll! Here's the excerpt I wrote on how to do it that can be found in CertificationZone's CCNA LAN Switching White Paper. Note that it doesn't have to be the "enable secret" password in order to force the Catalyst 1900 series switch to prompt for a user-mode password. Since it's a standard IOS command, it could likely be used on any Cisco IOS-based switch where access to user mode isn't restricted by default. "The global-configuration mode command enable password is used to secure access to the privileged exec mode. An enable password can be set to secure access to user exec mode if exec level 1 is specified in conjunction with the enable password command. For example: SwitchA(config)#enable password level 1 ." -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Tom Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 15, 2001 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT It looks like Pierre-Alex found it, enable secret level 1 cisco, although I haven't seen your response to his post yet. Tom -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 15, 2001 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dale Cunningham; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: USER MODE PASSWORD!!! I FOUND IT! Cisco1912(config)# enable secret level 1 cisco will require the password of "cisco" before allowing access to USER mode! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:50 PM To: Pierre-Alex Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MORE TECHNICAL DETAILS ON PROBLEM SOLVED: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT : Think really hard. You CAN do it. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 13, 2001 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MORE TECHNICAL DETAILS ON PROBLEM SOLVED: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT : I think the answer to your question is no. The only password that you can set on the 1900 is the enable password/secret ... Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:09 PM To: Pierre-Alex; Dale Cunningham Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MORE TECHNICAL DETAILS ON PROBLEM SOLVED: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT : Pierre, I see that Jorge Moreira managed to answer your question about vty passwords on the Cisco Catalyst 1900 series switch. What threw me (and Rik as well) was your inclusion of "XL" after 1912--the Cisco Catalyst 1912 (and 1924) switches are not part of the XL series. I needed a few minutes to make sure that Cisco hadn't come out with a new XL series switch for which I was unaware before I re-responded to your query. As you've discovered, Jorge is correct--it's the "enable" password on the Catalyst 1900 series switch that is used to enable telnet access. But since we're discussing password usage on the 1900 series... here's a bit of a brainteaser for you, the answer for which I had included in last month's CCNA LAN Switching paper on CertificationZone: You'll notice that when you access your Catalyst switch via the console port, that without issuing any sort of password, you're immediately able to access several commands on the switch -- you've immediately got access to "user mode". In some organizations, this can present a security risk. Can you set a "user-mode" password for the Catalyst 1900 series switch? If so, how? -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 13, 2001 12:39 PM To: Dale Cunningham; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MORE TECHNICAL DETAILS ON PROBLEM SOLVED: VTY LINES NON EXISTENT : Hi all, Technically speaking, there is no such thing as a console password on version 9.00.04. of the catalyst 1912XL-EN. Although it is called a console password, it is really an enable password. Following are the steps that demonstrate this: 1) Erase nvram to start "fresh" 2) Type P to set the console password to cisco 3) Press K to enter the command line mode. You will be in enable mode WITHOUT any prompt for a password. 4) Now try to enter enable mode. You are required to enter a password. (cisco) 5) Go to config mode, set the enable password to demo, then exit 6) The next time you try to access the exec mode, the password that will let you in will be demo, NOT cisco. This proves that the console password is really an enable password. Trying to understand why the user mode is unprotected (no console password -strictly speaking) I typed ? at the user mode. This is what I got: >? Exec commands: enableTurn on privileged commands exit Exit from the EXEC help Description of the interactive help system ping Send echo messages session Tunnel to module show Show running system information terminal Set terminal line par
Security Reject Count: command?
On a 1900, "the security reject count collumn of the Switch manager displays the number of unauthorized addresses seen on the secure port." (Cisco) Is it possible to get this information from the command line? Pierre-Alex _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thought youd enjoy this
Kelly D Griffin wrote: > > Perhaps they would like to respond back to this gentleman's e-mail in > Swahili. Let's see if they can still walk with the shoe on the other foot. > Language is irellevent - I thought his English was very good personally. It was posted to give people a laugh and provoke conversation over how someone can get certs like that and a) not know how to use a search engine. I was also indignant at the traditional AOL launch style "I bought the internet and so everyone on it is there for my support" attitude of it. Theres a difference between asking in a forum for help and privmailing expecting someone to run around and work their butt of like a helpdesk - I do enough of that in the day without finding it in my inbox when I get home. If I was looking for a job in India, and could speak swahili, Id use an appropriate search engine and ask on a forum. If people get the idea its OK to privmail questions like that, then every person who wants the same info will do the same, and Ill become the search engine, assuming my mailbox isnt full. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back to the point/ontopic Re: Thought youd enjoy this
OK. Whether people found it funny isnt really on topic. What I was aiming to do was povoke a discussion on how people fely about this stuff. How do people feel if a) their cisco certified status is used to declare open season for anyone wanting a job in their area reslulting in emails like that one filling up your inbox b) people are gaining certifications and applying for jobs in their field when they havent grasped rudimentary internet skills. TTFN Lauren CCNP-ATM, CCDP certified. aka Lauren, Free career advice, feel free to grab my email from usenet and use me to save you a few minutes of your precious time. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tragedy of the Commons (was Thought youd enjoy this
>I read a bit of callousness in Lauren's approach, >but I agree with the general idea Lauren proposes. >I have sent out similar emails to people who waste >my time, instead of doing a bit of research. I also >oppose the use of "shorthand" english in public emails. >It is offputting, so I tend to ignore those people >entirely. I, too, have a real problem with 3l33t d00dz and the like--whether it's meant to be the private language of an in-group (i.e., the previous example being Elite Dudes) or simply a way of avoiding typing. Believe me, I know there's a value for cryptic typing in bandwidth-constrained interactions such as telecommunications devices for the deaf (TDD), or old-style UNIX chat on machines with 300 bps connections. But the "shorthand" in no way improves readability, and, in my perhaps crotchety view, sends a message that the typist's time is more valuable than that of the reader. As the reader, that leaves me less than enchanted. > >But, Howard, aren't you being a little too cryptic? >The commons obviously is the listserv. But who are >putting too many sheep out? Lauren (and me, I guess, >by association with that point of view), or all the >others who criticize? > >Or both sides? I agree, it is time to end this thread. Baa, humbug, he said, sheepishly. > >Ray Mosely >CCNA, MCSE > >BTW, Howard, our first communiques ended up with you >bashing me. Thank you, sincerely, because I was humbled. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Howard C. Berkowitz >Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:55 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Tragedy of the Commons (was Thought youd enjoy this > > >There's a basic concept in economic theory called the "tragedy of the >commons." The commons, in this case, was a shared pasture in which >the village livestock could graze. As long as the number of cattle >fit the basic needs of each family, the commons provided enough >grazing land for all. > >But less cooperative people decided that they could increase their >personal profits by having more cows and sheep. Nothing wrong with >that -- except the also expected to pasture them on the common land, >rather than set up private pastures for private herds and flocks. > >The commons, however, had just so much capacity, and, when it was >overgrazed by the additional beasts, the grass could no longer >recover, and the entire resource died. Nothing could graze any >longer. > >Information based on people's time is a modern version. It takes >time to scan a list for irrelevant messages, especially when people >don't use informative subject headings. Outside North America, there >is often a monetary cost to downloading more and more material that >may not be of interest. > >So yes -- when people ask questions that could be answered with >reasonable use of a search engine, I get a bit annoyed. CCO, I >realize, can be uncooperative, and I am sympathetic to people who say >"I tried to find this on CCO but didn't get anything useful." > >There is no question that I'm usually rude to telemarketers. >Sometimes, they whine that they won't take much of my time. But I >really try to create a hostile work environment for telemarketers, >because if encouraged, they will waste so much of my time that I >won't be able to earn money to buy their products. > >Hopefully, my parable may convey something about effective and fair >use of lists. > >>Lauren Child wrote, > > > >>"Roberts, Timothy" wrote: >> > >>> Obviously english is not this persons first language. Why should this >>> person be made fun of because he has not fully mastered it yet? >>> >> >>He shouldnt. He should be made fun of for having an MCSE and CCNA, and >>working for CCNP, and not mastering the search engine. > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tragedy of the Commons (was Thought youd enjoy this
Ray Mosely wrote: > > I read a bit of callousness in Lauren's approach, > but I agree with the general idea Lauren proposes. > I have sent out similar emails to people who waste > my time, instead of doing a bit of research. I also > oppose the use of "shorthand" english in public emails. > It is offputting, so I tend to ignore those people > entirely. > Thank you, yes I was callous, but I was in a callous mood and am getting pretty fed up with people grabbing my address of usenet instead of posting to usenet and keeping the pasture going. Personally I think I have the right to get fed up when this is happenning a lot. Theres a difference between sharing a pasture, and half a dozen sheep running over and pestering you asking you personally to "please pass the grass", as they cant be bothered to bend over. If he'd tried a search engine and/or posted to a group or listserv that he needed help, then Id have *volunteered* my help, as I have done many times before. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISP/Dial Lab swap
I am looking to trade my May 23rd ISP-Dial lab date in Halifax for any = earlier date. I will accept anything with 10 days notice. Please = E-mail me if you are interested. I also would like to trade my Halifax = date for a San Jose date if possible. Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thought youd enjoy this
"Denis A. Baldwin" wrote: but there are hundreds of times where I looked > around the cisco site and didn't find anything only to ask the list and have > an answer within a few minutes. > yup but he didnt search and he didnt ask the list. If he had Id have replied sensibly. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE vs CCNP
The CCIE written test is much more difficult than the CCNP. It covers a lot of topics that CCNP not. I passed CCIE written first. The score is not high. After than, I did all 4 CCNP exams within one week and they are quite easy. I did my CCNP just for changing job. Anyway, CCNP is a certificate and then CCIE qualification exam not. You'd better go CCNP first and get good job & opportunities to work on CCIE. Chan. ""James"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 96fa9g$kfr$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96fa9g$kfr$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Is it reasonable to take the CCIE written instead of CCNP? I've been working > with Cisco equipment and software for over 10 years and decided to go ahead > with certification. The CCNP looks like a good choice, but it appears the > CCIE written only requires a few more months of study. Of course, the lab is > a different story. Has anyone tried this? > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IGRP to EIGRP conversion #2
I have a hub site with 5 remote sites connecting to it via frame relay. They are all running IGRP with the same AS. What would be the best way to migrate from IGRP to EIGRP? Starting by enabling EIGRP on the core router and run both IGRP and EIGRP. Then convert the spokes one by one. Then remove IGRP from the core. Can I just enable EIGRP on the remotes, allow some time to propagate routes in to the table, and then disable IGRP? The people up stairs will not allow for any significant down time. Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: adding rights to user mode??? (oops)
Mark, You can use a local security database (Username...) to set up user accounts with the privilege levels you want. Here's some URLs that have info and config samples. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113ed_cr/secur_c/scprt5/scpasswd.htm http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/dsqcg/qcsecur.htm#xtocid1133722 Hope this helps Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 2/15/2001 at 10:18 AM Zabludovsky, Mark A wrote: :Sorry, got mixed up with modes...I meant user... : :Hi Group, : I wanted to know if it was possible to allow somebody with only :user level access to a device, to see more than they normally can? :Basically, when they type the "show ?" command set, is there a way to allow :them to see more parameters than they normally can? Also, if this is :possible, would this be the same for everybody that went into the device :under user mode? Thanks for the help all... : :Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNP, CCDA :Saint Gobain WAN Team :Cisco Network Specialist :Work: (610) 341-7678 :Mobile: (267) 981-1123 : : :_ :FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html :Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
265x vs 3600 and BGP
It looks as if the 2650/2651 might just be the answer to some people's prayers for a lower end router that's capable of handling several full views of the BGP tables without springing for a 3640 or a 3660. The 265x models have one or two fast ether interfaces, and are designated "high performance", which I suppose means a better processor than the regular 2600s. They take up to 128 meg of dram, vs the 64 meg cap on the 2600s and the 3620. Cheaper base price than the cost of a 3640 even before factoring in the cost of an NM for LAN connectivity that's needed for the 3600. If you get the 2651, you have that second 10/100 ether, which could be used for a DMZ subnet for public-access machines. 128 meg of dram should be enough for 3-4 views of a 90k prefix BGP table, and the processor ought to be up to the task. Thoughts on this? Granted, with a lower end router, you lose out on some of the high-availability features of a 3660 or better, such as OIR and redundant power supplies, but RPS options also exist for the 2600. Does anyone know how the 3600 processors stack up against the 265x processor? For the majority of us who would purchase an ethernet interface for a 3620 anyway, it seems like there's little reason to look at the 3620 anymore at all. Ben -- Ben Hockenhull [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
