Thanks to you !! [7:29379]
After studying hard for a year under your influence, Groupstudy members, I passed BCRAN, BCMSN, BSCN and finaly CIT. Now, a next step before me, you know. Thanks to you all !! Zdenek Zajac CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29379t=29379 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: static routes [7:29372]
You can also either/or (to what router man suggested) remove the ip default-network command, and it would work as well.. Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29380t=29372 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed 640-505 Bcran [7:29353]
Thanks a lot and congrats ! Lee James wrote: A couple on the 700. But nothing to worry about. It was more product questions rather than set command questins. I looked over the 700 series chapter briefly, but we dont use any at our remote sites where I work so didnt put too much emphasis. Learn more then just how to configure x25. Most of the x25 questions are obscure theory questions and they are relentless with them. Again, something we dont use at work. Cristian Piatnitchi wrote: Hi How about the ugly Cisco 700 questions ? Any questions about this subject ? Michael Williams wrote: Congrats! The BCRAN is difficult, so you should have no problems with the others (assuming you study well) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29381t=29353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2509 connect fail Debug [7:29349]
Sean, Try 2 things. do a show users and see if you have already tied up that line. If so do a clear line (then the number). If that doesn't work you might have to do a stop bits=1 on your terminal line as sometimes the default is 1.5 stop bits. -Original Message- From: slloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 December 2001 21:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2509 connect fail Debug [7:29349] Here's the Debug of my 2509 connection problem R2509#telnet 10.1.1.1 2001 Trying 10.1.1.1, 2001 ... % Connection refused by remote host R2509# 06:02:47: TCB000C97C4 created 06:02:47: TCB000C97C4 setting property TCP_TOS (11) 1F2F7B 06:02:47: TCB000C97C4 bound to UNKNOWN.11035 06:02:47: TCP: sending SYN, seq 1297459931, ack 0 06:02:47: TCP0: Connection to 10.1.1.1:2001, advertising MSS 1474 06:02:47: tcp0: O CLOSED 10.1.1.1:2001 10.1.1.1:11035 seq 1297459931 OPTS 4 SYN WIN 4128 06:02:47: IP: s=10.1.1.1 (local), d=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), len 44, sending 06:02:47: TCP0: state was CLOSED - SYNSENT [11035 - 10.1.1.1(2001)] 06:02:47: IP: s=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), d=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), len 44, rcvd 3 06:02:47: tcp0: I LISTEN 10.1.1.1:11035 10.1.1.1:2001 seq 1297459931 OPTS 4 SYN WIN 4128 06:02:47: TCP: connection attempt to port 2001 06:02:47: TCP: sending RST, seq 0, ack 1297459932 06:02:47: TCP: sent RST to 10.1.1.1:11035 from 10.1.1.1:2001 06:02:47: IP: s=10.1.1.1 (local), d=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), len 40, sending 06:02:47: IP: s=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), d=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), len 40, rcvd 3 06:02:47: tcp0: I SYNSENT 10.1.1.1:2001 10.1.1.1:11035 seq 0 ACK 1297459932 RST WIN 0 06:02:47: TCP0: state was SYNSENT - CLOSED [11035 - 10.1.1.1(2001)] 06:02:47: TCP0: bad seg from 10.1.1.1 -- closing connection: seq 0 ack 129745993 2 rcvnxt 0 rcvwnd 0 06:02:47: TCP0: connection closed - remote sent RST 06:02:47: TCB 0xC97C4 destroyed IP arp mobility: aging arp mobility cache entries [Resuming connection 1 to 10.1.1.1 ... ] 06:03:01: TTY0: pause timer type 1 (OK) 06:03:01: tcp0: O ESTAB 10.1.1.1:2001 10.1.1.1:11034 seq 1270605017 ACK 1270609385 WIN 4128 06:03:01: IP: s=10.1.1.1 (local), d=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), len 40, sending 06:03:01: IP: s=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), d=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), len 40, rcvd 3 06:03:01: tcp1: I ESTAB 10.1.1.1:11034 10.1.1.1:2001 seq 1270605017 ACK 1270609385 WIN 4128 R2509# 06:03:05: tcp0: O ESTAB 10.1.1.1:2001 10.1.1.1:11034 seq 1270605017 ACK 1270609385 WIN 4128 06:03:05: IP: s=10.1.1.1 (local), d=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), len 40, sending 06:03:05: TTY0: resume timer type 1 (OK) 06:03:05: TTY0: destroy timer type 4 06:03:05: IP: s=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), d=10.1.1.1 (Loopback0), len 40, rcvd 3 06:03:05: tcp1: I ESTAB 10.1.1.1:11034 10.1.1.1:2001 seq 1270605017 ACK 1270609385 WIN 4128und all - Original Message - From: shawn lloyd To: Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 1:27 PM Subject: Re: 2509 configuration [7:29343] - Original Message - Hi I'm configuring a 2509 terminal server for my home lab. The octal cable is connected to the console ports of my 5 routers. But when I try to establish a telnet connection I receive the following : R2509#telnet 10.1.1.1 2001 Trying 10.1.1.1, 2001 ... Open But nothing else happens. I'm not able to log into the router. THe configuration of the terminal server is ! service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname R2509 ! enable secret cisco ! no ip domain-lookup ! ip host r1-2501 2001 10.1.1.1 ip host r2-2501 2002 10.1.1.1 ip host r3-2501 2003 10.1.1.1 ip host r4-2502 2004 10.1.1.1 ip host r5-2523 2005 10.1.1.1 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! ip classless ! line con 0 ! line 1 8 transport input all no exec line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Router 1 configuration R1-2501#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname R1-2501 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.2 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache shutdown no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! ip classless ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29382t=29349 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About Frame Relay [7:29383]
Does anyone know any websites that have good simple introduction/explaination on Frame Relay network ? Pls direct me. What does it mean by Frame Relay is a layer 2 protocol (Data link layer) and Frame Relay works on the layer 2 of the OSI model ? Appreciate for any enlightenment. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29383t=29383 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About Frame Relay [7:29383]
Heres a Cisco fundamentals site. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/frame.htm Brian Whalen - Original Message - From: Anthony Toh To: Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:44 AM Subject: About Frame Relay [7:29383] Does anyone know any websites that have good simple introduction/explaination on Frame Relay network ? Pls direct me. What does it mean by Frame Relay is a layer 2 protocol (Data link layer) and Frame Relay works on the layer 2 of the OSI model ? Appreciate for any enlightenment. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29390t=29383 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: IOS-Based Cat 1900 series Cat 2820 series Cat 2900XL series Set-based Cat5000 series Cat 6000 series Cat 6500 series Cat 2900 However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. Does that sound right? --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29391t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
The 1900 series is also menu-driven. To make things more confusing, their IOS-type command set is different than the IOS-like commands on the 2900XL series. John Dennis Laganiere 12/17/01 11:45:33 AM I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: IOS-Based Cat 1900 series Cat 2820 series Cat 2900XL series Set-based Cat5000 series Cat 6000 series Cat 6500 series Cat 2900 However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. Does that sound right? --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29393t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame relay traffic shaping problem [7:28590]
hmm, must be standards not RFCs. today I was asking en passant and was told one can teach the routers to behave like nice switches with some connect commands Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... do RFC's cover how frame switches behave? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Georg Naggies Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 8:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Frame relay traffic shaping problem [7:28590] Can it be that Cisco Routers acting as FR switches never do... AFAIR they are just not fully RFC compliant. Tom Gardiner wrote: Folks, Would any of you folks have references to working scenarious demonstrating frame relay qos. I have been tearing by hair out to make my switch mark packets with Becns without success, no matter how much I choke the pipe. I am sure I am missing something basic. I have included some of my configs, if anyone cares to critique Thanks Tom Gardiner Router_4#sh frame-relay pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0/1 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 1000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 104, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0/1 input pkts 43364 output pkts 45110in bytes 35435312 out bytes 40742346 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 Shaping adapts to BECN pvc create time 02:07:12, last time pvc status changed 02:07:12 Router_4#sh frame-relay pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0/1 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 1000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 104, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0/1 input pkts 43418 output pkts 45176in bytes 35443159 out bytes 40746686 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 Shaping adapts to BECN pvc create time 02:07:45, last time pvc status changed 02:07:45 = Switch config Router_4# hostname Router_6 ! logging rate-limit console 10 except errors ! ip subnet-zero no ip finger no ip domain-lookup ! no ip dhcp-client network-discovery frame-relay switching ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.1.1.200 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache logging event subif-link-status logging event dlci-status-change no fair-queue clockrate 400 frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay interface-dlci 401 switched class s0 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay policing frame-relay congestion-management ! interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache logging event subif-link-status logging event dlci-status-change no fair-queue frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay interface-dlci 104 switched class s1 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay policing frame-relay congestion-management ! ip kerberos source-interface any ip classless no ip http server ! ! map-class frame-relay s0 frame-relay cir 400 frame-relay mincir 200 frame-relay holdq 10 frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn ! map-class frame-relay s1 frame-relay cir 2000 frame-relay mincir 1000 frame-relay holdq 10 frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn connect s0 Serial0 401 Serial1 104 ! ! ! == typical frame relay client Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.3 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Router_2 ! ! username Router_5 password 0 ipexpert ip subnet-zero no ip finger no ip domain-lookup isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! process-max-time 200 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 200.0.0.2 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet0 description connected to Cisco1538 ip address 10.1.1.211 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 20.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation
RE: CCIE Lab Book Review [7:28991]
It is a very good introductory book. I recommend using that book and implement those labs on smaller rack (4-5 routers). Next step would be to do more advanced labs like, IPExpert or Ccbootcamp. -Keyur Shah- CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching) css1,ccna,ccda,scsa,scna,mct,mcse,mcp+i,mcp,cni,mcne,cne,cna Hello Computers Say Hello to Your Future! http://www.hellocomputers.com Toll-Free: 1.877.794.3556 Fremont: 510.795.6815 Santa Clara: 408.496.0801 Europe: +(44)20 7900 3011 Fax: 510.291.2250 -Original Message- From: Elijah Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Lab Book Review [7:28991] Does anyone have any comments on this book not many reviews on Amazon. A guy at work said this thing was so full of mistakes that he got so angry and took it out to the gun range and filled it full of 44magnum holes and has it displayed on his desk now, I just can't take his word for it and the few reviews on Amazon were good reviews. Cisco CCIE All In One Lab Lab Study Guide ISBN 0-07-212760-0 By Stephen Hutnik Micheal Satterlee Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29395t=28991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
Cisco has had two releases of the 2900XL series. The early ones were deeper and (I believe) used a 9 pin console cable. I seem to remember that they did not have the XL logo. Confirmation/denial requested from the list. For set based command switches then best to be specific: 2901, 2926. BTW 4000s are set based. 3500XL are IOS based. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] The 1900 series is also menu-driven. To make things more confusing, their IOS-type command set is different than the IOS-like commands on the 2900XL series. John Dennis Laganiere 12/17/01 11:45:33 AM I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: IOS-Based Cat 1900 series Cat 2820 series Cat 2900XL series Set-based Cat5000 series Cat 6000 series Cat 6500 series Cat 2900 However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. Does that sound right? --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29396t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame relay traffic shaping problem [7:28590]
At 03:17 AM 12/17/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: do RFC's cover how frame switches behave? Nope. Frame Relay is documented by the ITU-T and ANSI. The Frame Relay Forum specifies enhancements that they hope will become standards. I would imagine some RFCs explain issues related to running TCP/IP over Frame Relay. One that comes to mind is RFC 2390 which defines Inverse ARP. But a Frame Relay switch wouldn't care about that. But you knew that. ;-) Priscilla -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Georg Naggies Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 8:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Frame relay traffic shaping problem [7:28590] Can it be that Cisco Routers acting as FR switches never do... AFAIR they are just not fully RFC compliant. Tom Gardiner wrote: Folks, Would any of you folks have references to working scenarious demonstrating frame relay qos. I have been tearing by hair out to make my switch mark packets with Becns without success, no matter how much I choke the pipe. I am sure I am missing something basic. I have included some of my configs, if anyone cares to critique Thanks Tom Gardiner Router_4#sh frame-relay pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0/1 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 1000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 104, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0/1 input pkts 43364 output pkts 45110in bytes 35435312 out bytes 40742346 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 Shaping adapts to BECN pvc create time 02:07:12, last time pvc status changed 02:07:12 Router_4#sh frame-relay pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0/1 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 1000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 104, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0/1 input pkts 43418 output pkts 45176in bytes 35443159 out bytes 40746686 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 Shaping adapts to BECN pvc create time 02:07:45, last time pvc status changed 02:07:45 = Switch config Router_4# hostname Router_6 ! logging rate-limit console 10 except errors ! ip subnet-zero no ip finger no ip domain-lookup ! no ip dhcp-client network-discovery frame-relay switching ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.1.1.200 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache logging event subif-link-status logging event dlci-status-change no fair-queue clockrate 400 frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay interface-dlci 401 switched class s0 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay policing frame-relay congestion-management ! interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache logging event subif-link-status logging event dlci-status-change no fair-queue frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay interface-dlci 104 switched class s1 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay policing frame-relay congestion-management ! ip kerberos source-interface any ip classless no ip http server ! ! map-class frame-relay s0 frame-relay cir 400 frame-relay mincir 200 frame-relay holdq 10 frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn ! map-class frame-relay s1 frame-relay cir 2000 frame-relay mincir 1000 frame-relay holdq 10 frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn connect s0 Serial0 401 Serial1 104 ! ! ! == typical frame relay client Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.3 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Router_2 ! ! username Router_5 password 0 ipexpert ip subnet-zero no ip finger no ip domain-lookup isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! process-max-time 200 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 200.0.0.2 255.255.255.0 !
how to disable NAT in PIX firewall (both inside an [7:29303]
Hi Everyone, I am having problem setting up a network in this scenario with my PIX515-UR firewall running version 6.1(1) with pdm version 1.1(2). I have a network with REGISTERED IP addresses. The inside interface of the PIX is on the 129.174.1.0/24 network with IP address of 129.174.1.254. The outside interface of the PIX is on the 66.61.46.0/24 network with IP address of 66.61.46.120. The inside interface has a security level of 100 and the outside interface has security level of 0. On the inside internal network, I have 10 workstations range from 129.174.1.1-10. These workstations have the default gateway point to the inside interface of the PIX. I understand that for machines from the inside network to access the Internet, the command nat and global must be used. However, since I all of my machines have valid (aka registered IP addresses), I want to disabe NAT completely. For, example, I want machine 129.174.1.1 to be able to browse and ping any machines on the Internet. At the same time, I don't want users from the Internet to be able to access any of the workstations on the inside interface. I have been searching for documentation on Cisco website but it seems likemost of the example have to do with NAT enable. There are a few examples that will disable NAT but it is relatedto VPN which is something I don't want. Furthermore, most of the examples fill with errors and pretty worthless (for PIX anyway). If anyone has done this before, let me know. I also include a copy of the config. Thanks. David PIX Version 6.1(1) nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 nameif ethernet2 dmz security50 enable password sdfkjfdjjdfjksdf encrypted passwd sdfjksdfkjsdfjksjf encrypted hostname ciscopix fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol h323 1720 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol rtsp 554 fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 fixup protocol sip 5060 fixup protocol skinny 2000 names access-list no-nat-list permit ip any any access-list no-nat-list permit icmp any any pager lines 24 interface ethernet0 auto interface ethernet1 auto interface ethernet2 auto mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 mtu dmz 1500 ip address outside 66.61.46.120 255.255.255.0 ip address inside 129.174.1.254 255.255.255.0 ip address dmz 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 ip audit info action alarm ip audit attack action alarm no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover poll 15 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address dmz 0.0.0.0 pdm history enable arp timeout 14400 nat (inside) 0 129.174.1.0 255.255.255.0 static (inside, outside) 129.174.1.0 129.174.1.0 conduit permit ip any any conduit permit icmp any any route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 66.61.46.254 1 timeout xlate 3:00:00 timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+ aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius no snmp-server location no snmp-server contact snmp-server community public no snmp-server enable traps floodguard enable no sysopt route dnat telnet timeout 5 ssh timeout 5 terminal width 80 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29303t=29303 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
right on with the menu driven on the early 1900's ... they are goofy. jason -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] Cisco has had two releases of the 2900XL series. The early ones were deeper and (I believe) used a 9 pin console cable. I seem to remember that they did not have the XL logo. Confirmation/denial requested from the list. For set based command switches then best to be specific: 2901, 2926. BTW 4000s are set based. 3500XL are IOS based. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] The 1900 series is also menu-driven. To make things more confusing, their IOS-type command set is different than the IOS-like commands on the 2900XL series. John Dennis Laganiere 12/17/01 11:45:33 AM I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: IOS-Based Cat 1900 series Cat 2820 series Cat 2900XL series Set-based Cat5000 series Cat 6000 series Cat 6500 series Cat 2900 However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. Does that sound right? --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29402t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About Frame Relay [7:29383]
See also Frame Relay Forum for basic guide, tutorials, primers and specs (Implementation Agreements). http://www.frforum.com Very briefly: Frame Relay architecture encompasses only the lowest two layers hence the _frame relay_ - at link layer. The bottom two layers are just enough (even more than that) for a fast transport WAN service over quite reliable physical links. Rita Anthony Toh wrote: Does anyone know any websites that have good simple introduction/explaination on Frame Relay network ? Pls direct me. What does it mean by Frame Relay is a layer 2 protocol (Data link layer) and Frame Relay works on the layer 2 of the OSI model ? Appreciate for any enlightenment. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29403t=29383 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
need advice [7:29392]
i have just finished my ccna programme and i am currently doing a 2 month internship programme with an outfit that runs a cyber cafe business that provides internet access services for the public. i am their interim network administrator. i have noticed a lot of loopholes in the network. and some of my problems i need answers to are:- 1. how do i use a single command line to deny access to all pornographic/adult sites on the network. 2. some computers within the network are denied access to network(to use network resources like the network printer).but the same computers can see the shared internet access. your useful advise would be appreciated. yours truly, festus taferi. __ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29392t=29392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to disable NAT in PIX firewall (both insid [7:29404]
Any address that matches a NAT command with an index of 0 will not be translated. The problem with your configuration is the STATIC command you are using. The mask is invalid and then entire command is not necessary. Also, what are you trying to do with those access-lists? They are not applied. They will compromise your security and is probably not necessary given your simple setup. Take care, Paul Borghese - Original Message - From: David Tran Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:13 PM Subject: how to disable NAT in PIX firewall (both inside an [7:29303] Hi Everyone, I am having problem setting up a network in this scenario with my PIX515-UR firewall running version 6.1(1) with pdm version 1.1(2). I have a network with REGISTERED IP addresses. The inside interface of the PIX is on the 129.174.1.0/24 network with IP address of 129.174.1.254. The outside interface of the PIX is on the 66.61.46.0/24 network with IP address of 66.61.46.120. The inside interface has a security level of 100 and the outside interface has security level of 0. On the inside internal network, I have 10 workstations range from 129.174.1.1-10. These workstations have the default gateway point to the inside interface of the PIX. I understand that for machines from the inside network to access the Internet, the command nat and global must be used. However, since I all of my machines have valid (aka registered IP addresses), I want to disabe NAT completely. For, example, I want machine 129.174.1.1 to be able to browse and ping any machines on the Internet. At the same time, I don't want users from the Internet to be able to access any of the workstations on the inside interface. I have been searching for documentation on Cisco website but it seems likemost of the example have to do with NAT enable. There are a few examples that will disable NAT but it is relatedto VPN which is something I don't want. Furthermore, most of the examples fill with errors and pretty worthless (for PIX anyway). If anyone has done this before, let me know. I also include a copy of the config. Thanks. David PIX Version 6.1(1) nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 nameif ethernet2 dmz security50 enable password sdfkjfdjjdfjksdf encrypted passwd sdfjksdfkjsdfjksjf encrypted hostname ciscopix fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol h323 1720 fixup protocol rsh 514 fixup protocol rtsp 554 fixup protocol smtp 25 fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 fixup protocol sip 5060 fixup protocol skinny 2000 names access-list no-nat-list permit ip any any access-list no-nat-list permit icmp any any pager lines 24 interface ethernet0 auto interface ethernet1 auto interface ethernet2 auto mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 mtu dmz 1500 ip address outside 66.61.46.120 255.255.255.0 ip address inside 129.174.1.254 255.255.255.0 ip address dmz 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 ip audit info action alarm ip audit attack action alarm no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover poll 15 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address dmz 0.0.0.0 pdm history enable arp timeout 14400 nat (inside) 0 129.174.1.0 255.255.255.0 static (inside, outside) 129.174.1.0 129.174.1.0 conduit permit ip any any conduit permit icmp any any route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 66.61.46.254 1 timeout xlate 3:00:00 timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+ aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius no snmp-server location no snmp-server contact snmp-server community public no snmp-server enable traps floodguard enable no sysopt route dnat telnet timeout 5 ssh timeout 5 terminal width 80 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29404t=29404 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: This Arab tried to attack me. [7:29190]
I just ran a scan from symantec and I do have 100 infected files.I am now downloading the virus protected software.Thanks for your understanding Paul. This is for those who think I am an Arab,Which is fine with me.Because I am proud of who I am and what I believe in.I was born and raise in Trinidad and Tobago West Indies and my ancestors are from Africa and I reverted to Islam since 1974(27 years) which included changing my name from a Christian name to a Muslim name.I my heart I have no color and no nationality.I hurt when I see pain all over the world.This much I would say about myself. Muhammad Alkhattab - Original Message - From: Paul Borghese To: Muhammad Alkhattab Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 12:26 AM Subject: Re: This Arab tried to attack me. [7:29190] I have receive a number of e-mails that look like they originated from you with viruses attached. Plus I have receive complaints from others about receiving viruses from you. Not that you did this malicious. Just the automated type that is sent out after an infection. It happens to all of us. You may want to scan your system for viruses just to be safe. Of course it could be an imposter because the e-mails always had the from address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Notice the _ in the e-mail address. Take care, Paul - Original Message - From: Muhammad Alkhattab To: Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 12:54 AM Subject: Re: This Arab tried to attack me. [7:29190] Who ever you are.I have never sent you any virus.I myself has been receiving spams(mails that have never sent). Muhammad Alkhattab - Original Message - From: Jon Street To: Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:56 AM Subject: This Arab tried to attack me. [7:29190] Muhammad Alkhattab e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] must have taken offence to my statments about those who said on this fourm about us needing to understand the terrorists issues and why they are so angry with us. This little worm tried sending me viruses to screw up my computer. I just wanted to let everyone know who this person is. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29278t=29190 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
I believe you are correct that the earlier 2900XL switches were (much) deeper and required a DB9 console connector. All of the 2900s I've ever used were IOS based, not set based. However, I can't say I've used all of the different models 2900 out there =) Mike Daniel Cotts wrote: Cisco has had two releases of the 2900XL series. The early ones were deeper and (I believe) used a 9 pin console cable. I seem to remember that they did not have the XL logo. Confirmation/denial requested from the list. For set based command switches then best to be specific: 2901, 2926. BTW 4000s are set based. 3500XL are IOS based. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29406t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2509 configuration [7:29343]
just hit enter once it says open. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29407t=29343 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can I make the etherchannel over mutiple device li [7:29378]
AFAIK, I don't think this is possible. Most of the implementations of etherchannel I've seen (I could be wrong, but someone will let me know I'm sure) require the the ports in the etherchannel be contiguous. It is possible with newer version of the IOS, however, to perform Multichassis PPP Multilink. Perhaps this could be used to help your situation. Back on the topic of wierd conditions for etherchannel to work, I found a document talking about Etherchannel on the Cat5000. For instance, if you have a blade of 12 - fastethernet ports in a 5000, there are only certain ways you can setup your etherchannels. In the following (ASCII) example, each letter will represent a switchport with an 'x' indicating 'not in use' and '|' indicates a break in the logical 4 port grouping the EtherChannel Bundling Controller (EBC) sees: | | This is valid, three channels of four ports each. AABB | CCxx | DDEE This is valid, but it will be viewed as six channels of 2 ports each. | BBxx | This is valid, one channel of four ports, and one channel of 2 ports. xxAA | AAxx | This is invalid, as all ports aren't in the same group (of 4 ports) xxAA | | This is invalid, as you cannot channel ports 3/4 without ports 1/2 in a 4 port group. xAAA | | This is invalid: only 3 ports in the channel. xAAx | | This is invalid as channels MUST start with an odd numbered port. Just though it was interesting enough to share =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29410t=29378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I make the etherchannel over mutiple device like 3500? [7:29409]
I think it's possible although I've never read anywhere that you could. On a Nortel Passport 8100/8600 you can. cage wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can I make the etherchannel between the mutiple device statck like 3500? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29409t=29409 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Error on Cat6500..... [7:29411]
I had a Cat6500 setup in the basement and was using for testing on various things. We moved it up into our Data Center. I wiped NVRAM on both Sup engines (separately), and not it's booted up and running on the Sup in slot 2 (with the Sup in slot 1 (supposedly) in standby mode). From the console, I get this repeating error message: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 1 is set off (admin reque) I never received this message the entire time I was using in the basement. I'm going to go and shut it down, yank the two Sups and reseat them just to make sure they're okay Just curious to see if there was any specific cause for this message. I searched Cisco's site to no avail. Thanks! Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29411t=29411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I make the etherchannel over mutiple device li [7:29412]
Maybe I read his question wrong, but if he's got a 6500 in 1 closet and a stack of 3500's in a different closet, I believe it's possible to etherchannel from the 6500 to the stack. If he's staticng that he's trying to go from stack to stack, I'm not so sure unless the management software could handle it (and I doubt it does, since the ASIC's on some switches can be so picky). Maybe I'm reading too much into his question though. Michael Williams wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... AFAIK, I don't think this is possible. Most of the implementations of etherchannel I've seen (I could be wrong, but someone will let me know I'm sure) require the the ports in the etherchannel be contiguous. It is possible with newer version of the IOS, however, to perform Multichassis PPP Multilink. Perhaps this could be used to help your situation. Back on the topic of wierd conditions for etherchannel to work, I found a document talking about Etherchannel on the Cat5000. For instance, if you have a blade of 12 - fastethernet ports in a 5000, there are only certain ways you can setup your etherchannels. In the following (ASCII) example, each letter will represent a switchport with an 'x' indicating 'not in use' and '|' indicates a break in the logical 4 port grouping the EtherChannel Bundling Controller (EBC) sees: | | This is valid, three channels of four ports each. AABB | CCxx | DDEE This is valid, but it will be viewed as six channels of 2 ports each. | BBxx | This is valid, one channel of four ports, and one channel of 2 ports. xxAA | AAxx | This is invalid, as all ports aren't in the same group (of 4 ports) xxAA | | This is invalid, as you cannot channel ports 3/4 without ports 1/2 in a 4 port group. xAAA | | This is invalid: only 3 ports in the channel. xAAx | | This is invalid as channels MUST start with an odd numbered port. Just though it was interesting enough to share =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29412t=29412 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco academy's routing skills final ,tough!!! [7:29212]
I didn't take offense, Priscilla. BTW, we now have a ver. 2 of the BCRAN course (haven't had a chance to review it yet -- another Winter Break project) and hopefully the new skills based final will be less stressful. Part of the problem with the first one was more with the ambiguous instructions rather than the knowledge level required. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: I wasn't criticizing the teacher. I just wanted to make that clear. ;-) Designing a final exam that everyone fails just seems like a poor method of eduction. We learned to do the opposite in the education classes I took recently. I realize that the design is Cisco's, not the Academy instructor's. Priscilla At 03:13 PM 12/14/01, you wrote: I resemble that remark! Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: It sounds like some old-fashioned meanie wrote this test. Priscilla At 12:32 PM 12/14/01, brian hall wrote: Just a message to those who (like me!) thinking that reading, doing labs and taking multiple choice test will prepare you for the real world and (hopefully)the CCIE lab need to be exposed to cisco's network accademy semester 5 skills final . I just took it yesterday and failed . In fact the whole class failed. One of our students who scored high on most test and blazed through the final written exam in 10 mins, walked out in frustration . Another student who works as an administrator, was are best chance of having someone pass missed it . I myself knew after an hour that if you don't have those commands down cold with a solid understanding of how to implement them your GOOSE is cooked !!! . You do have the option to have your own written notes to help but that might weigh you down if too much is in front of you . Working on idividual labs is one thing but putting the whole environment together is a whole different animal . Once given the actual skills asessment designing, implementing and trouble shooting you assume that this ones in the bag . The environment wasn't large and looking back at the running config's there wasnt much to them other than having MED and CBAC . Ah!!! but how wrong I was!!! I'll spare the details and say that this was an eye opener . It showed me what I really don't know and to do the job in the real world will take a lot work on my part . Buyer Beware !!! Overall it was good to go through and to be pushed just shows the weak areas FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29413t=29212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco academy's routing skills final ,tough!!! [7:29212]
Oh, I don't know; maybe they might be trying to take the paper aspect out of the cert you're studying to get? Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Doug wrote: Well, I am taking my test in Aurora, CO. We will have 2.5 hrs and no group...one shot...wonderful, huh! Wonder how they come up with this final? Doug Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29414t=29212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hsrp/ospf/eigrp for redundant internet [7:29417]
Ok guys/gals, I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone that cares to respond. we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other facillites. Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's thanks! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29417t=29417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
I know that the 2948G and 2980 switches are Cat Based not IOS. -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] Cisco has had two releases of the 2900XL series. The early ones were deeper and (I believe) used a 9 pin console cable. I seem to remember that they did not have the XL logo. Confirmation/denial requested from the list. For set based command switches then best to be specific: 2901, 2926. BTW 4000s are set based. 3500XL are IOS based. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] The 1900 series is also menu-driven. To make things more confusing, their IOS-type command set is different than the IOS-like commands on the 2900XL series. John Dennis Laganiere 12/17/01 11:45:33 AM I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: IOS-Based Cat 1900 series Cat 2820 series Cat 2900XL series Set-based Cat5000 series Cat 6000 series Cat 6500 series Cat 2900 However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. Does that sound right? --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29416t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco academy's routing skills final ,tough!!! [7:29212]
Although I would prefer that all my students passed on the first try, you are correct in your assessment. Unfortunately, having passed the CCNA exam does not guarantee success at the CCNP level. I have stated before that I like to compare the Cisco certs to the Crafts skills designators. I consider the CCNA an apprentice, the CCNP journeyman, and CCIE master craftsman level of expertise. Not all apprentices make it to the journeyman level and very few journeymen ascend to the Master craftsman level. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Brian Whalen wrote: I really don't agree that everyone should pass, tho perhaps that was a wisecrack I didn't see. Inevitably in any class some students try and some don't. If everyone fails then yes perhaps that is a problem, but given the material difficulty, I would expect a substantial failure rate. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Tom Lisa wrote: I resemble that remark! Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: It sounds like some old-fashioned meanie wrote this test. Priscilla At 12:32 PM 12/14/01, brian hall wrote: Just a message to those who (like me!) thinking that reading, doing labs and taking multiple choice test will prepare you for the real world and (hopefully)the CCIE lab need to be exposed to cisco's network accademy semester 5 skills final . I just took it yesterday and failed . In fact the whole class failed. One of our students who scored high on most test and blazed through the final written exam in 10 mins, walked out in frustration . Another student who works as an administrator, was are best chance of having someone pass missed it . I myself knew after an hour that if you don't have those commands down cold with a solid understanding of how to implement them your GOOSE is cooked !!! . You do have the option to have your own written notes to help but that might weigh you down if too much is in front of you . Working on idividual labs is one thing but putting the whole environment together is a whole different animal . Once given the actual skills asessment designing, implementing and trouble shooting you assume that this ones in the bag . The environment wasn't large and looking back at the running config's there wasnt much to them other than having MED and CBAC . Ah!!! but how wrong I was!!! I'll spare the details and say that this was an eye opener . It showed me what I really don't know and to do the job in the real world will take a lot work on my part . Buyer Beware !!! Overall it was good to go through and to be pushed just shows the weak areas FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29418t=29212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco academy's routing skills final ,tough!!! [7:29212]
Priscilla, Every component of the skills based exam is seen by the students during the semester. The academic portion is presented, and then one or more labs on that area are given. This volume of labs done during the semester, nearly 60, may also contribute to the problem. Version 2 of the curriculum combines and reduces the number of lab assignments. Time will tell whether this is good or bad. In addition to my previous comment regarding clarity of the instructions, perhaps we are requiring too much in the time allotted. BTW, my students get to use any handwritten notes they have during the exam. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: It wasn't a wisecrack, but it wasn't very well stated. The final exam should be a summary of what was taught and practiced in class. It shouldn't contain surprises or new materials or test new skills that weren't developed in the course. The course developer's goal should be that everyone passes. Everyone passing means the course worked. That doesn't mean that everyone will. In this particular example, I would imagine that to pass, a student has to spend a lot of time practicing. Ensuring that is outside the course developer's control. On the other hand, the course developer could incorporate lots of labs, practice tests, etc., into the materials. It sounds to me like the interim tests were multiple choice and the final was hands-on. That's broken. Priscilla At 05:42 PM 12/16/01, Brian Whalen wrote: I really don't agree that everyone should pass, tho perhaps that was a wisecrack I didn't see. Inevitably in any class some students try and some don't. If everyone fails then yes perhaps that is a problem, but given the material difficulty, I would expect a substantial failure rate. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Tom Lisa wrote: I resemble that remark! Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: It sounds like some old-fashioned meanie wrote this test. Priscilla At 12:32 PM 12/14/01, brian hall wrote: Just a message to those who (like me!) thinking that reading, doing labs and taking multiple choice test will prepare you for the real world and (hopefully)the CCIE lab need to be exposed to cisco's network accademy semester 5 skills final . I just took it yesterday and failed . In fact the whole class failed. One of our students who scored high on most test and blazed through the final written exam in 10 mins, walked out in frustration . Another student who works as an administrator, was are best chance of having someone pass missed it . I myself knew after an hour that if you don't have those commands down cold with a solid understanding of how to implement them your GOOSE is cooked !!! . You do have the option to have your own written notes to help but that might weigh you down if too much is in front of you . Working on idividual labs is one thing but putting the whole environment together is a whole different animal . Once given the actual skills asessment designing, implementing and trouble shooting you assume that this ones in the bag . The environment wasn't large and looking back at the running config's there wasnt much to them other than having MED and CBAC . Ah!!! but how wrong I was!!! I'll spare the details and say that this was an eye opener . It showed me what I really don't know and to do the job in the real world will take a lot work on my part FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hsrp/ospf/eigrp for redundant internet [7:29417]
If each site has multiple links, are they to the same or different providers? If each only has 1 link, then regardless of what routing method you use, a down linl=a down site. You could get an as, do ibgp between them and make them multihomed, though that costs dough. At a minumum, you could dual home each site to the same provider, thereby not needing bgp.. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: Ok guys/gals, I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone that cares to respond. we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other facillites. Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's thanks! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29421t=29417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I make the etherchannel over mutiple device li [7:29422]
Michael Williams wrote: AFAIK, I don't think this is possible. Most of the implementations of etherchannel I've seen (I could be wrong, but someone will let me know I'm sure) require the the ports in the etherchannel be contiguous. Since you asked:) It's very possible to etherchannel accross ports and even cards as long as your using 6xxx and 4xxx switches and I believe GSR's. If there are others I'm sure someone will remind me;) Dave David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29422t=29422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hsrp/ospf/eigrp for redundant internet [7:29417]
well each site has one link to the inernet but it also has it's wan link to the enterprise. What I want though is for one site's internet connection to go down and it be able to use it's wan link to find another way to get to the internet. -Patrick Brian Whalen 12/17/01 04:46PM If each site has multiple links, are they to the same or different providers? If each only has 1 link, then regardless of what routing method you use, a down linl=a down site. You could get an as, do ibgp between them and make them multihomed, though that costs dough. At a minumum, you could dual home each site to the same provider, thereby not needing bgp.. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: Ok guys/gals, I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone that cares to respond. we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other facillites. Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's thanks! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29423t=29417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hsrp/ospf/eigrp for redundant internet [7:29417]
backup default route, just use a higher metric. Assuming you are willing to do that.. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: well each site has one link to the inernet but it also has it's wan link to the enterprise. What I want though is for one site's internet connection to go down and it be able to use it's wan link to find another way to get to the internet. -Patrick Brian Whalen 12/17/01 04:46PM If each site has multiple links, are they to the same or different providers? If each only has 1 link, then regardless of what routing method you use, a down linl=a down site. You could get an as, do ibgp between them and make them multihomed, though that costs dough. At a minumum, you could dual home each site to the same provider, thereby not needing bgp.. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: Ok guys/gals, I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone that cares to respond. we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other facillites. Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's thanks! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29424t=29417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hsrp/ospf/eigrp for redundant internet [7:29417]
HSRP is for backing up LAN connections. It will not work in your situation as I understand it. If you're using OSPF you could restructure things so that your border routers are injecting 0.0.0.0/0 as an E1 route into the area. If you let those propagate throughout your network each router will choose the closest available exit. This assumes that this use of default routing won't break something else you're doing. Perhaps you could also do this manually using weighted static default routes in your areas. HTH, John Patrick Ramsey 12/17/01 3:51:08 PM Ok guys/gals, I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone that cares to respond. we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other facillites. Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's thanks! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29425t=29417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
I've got one of the older 2900XL switches that can't be upgraded to the newest 2900XL IOS software. It isn't deeper than any other 2900XL switch I've seen. It also uses a standard console cable - the same that you would use with a Cisco router. My early 2900XL is also IOS-based, and not CatOS nor menu-driven. The 2948G layer 3 switch (and 2980 I'd assume as well although I haven't kept on top of switch releases and this one I'm not familiar with) use CatOS commands but these switches are not part of the XL line. And if I recall correctly, the old obsoleted 2901 switch was also CatOS based (and again isn't part of the XL line). The 2900XL series is funky in that although it does use IOS-based commands, they don't follow the traditional commands - so yes Dennis you are correct. Whether you're correct on which commands differ, I can't confirm that at the moment (although I do recall that the trunking and portfast commands are different and irritatingly so). -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bolton, Travis Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] I know that the 2948G and 2980 switches are Cat Based not IOS. -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] Cisco has had two releases of the 2900XL series. The early ones were deeper and (I believe) used a 9 pin console cable. I seem to remember that they did not have the XL logo. Confirmation/denial requested from the list. For set based command switches then best to be specific: 2901, 2926. BTW 4000s are set based. 3500XL are IOS based. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] The 1900 series is also menu-driven. To make things more confusing, their IOS-type command set is different than the IOS-like commands on the 2900XL series. John Dennis Laganiere 12/17/01 11:45:33 AM I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: IOS-Based Cat 1900 series Cat 2820 series Cat 2900XL series Set-based Cat5000 series Cat 6000 series Cat 6500 series Cat 2900 However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. Does that sound right? --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29427t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
By the way Dennis - if you truly want to find the demarcation point, search all of Cisco's old press releases. You'll find the origins of each switch and understand the different OS supported by each. I found it fascinating research when I did it... -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dennis Laganiere Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: IOS-Based Cat 1900 series Cat 2820 series Cat 2900XL series Set-based Cat5000 series Cat 6000 series Cat 6500 series Cat 2900 However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. Does that sound right? --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29428t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE SECURITY WORK BOOK [7:29429]
I am planning on purchasing the CCIE SECURITY WORK BOOK for a Christmas gift. Any one have any feedback on this book or know of a cheaper price than $200? *** Employment Consultant CRG Executive Search Rescue Placement Office: 954-677-9912 Fax: 888-624-8659 *** [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Chess.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29429t=29429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
need advice [7:29392]
I am planning on purchasing the CCIE SECURITY WORK BOOK for a Christmas gift. Any one have any feedback on this book or know of a cheaper price than $200? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29430t=29392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hsrp/ospf/eigrp for redundant internet [7:29417]
No HSRP is not for you. HSPR provides redundancy when you have two routers on the same LAN. You simply need to set up a floating default to another location that makes the most sense as a backup from a particular site. Dave Patrick Ramsey wrote: Ok guys/gals, I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone that cares to respond. we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other facillites. Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's thanks! -Patrick -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29433t=29417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Error on Cat6500..... [7:29411]
Funny you mention that. I'm not seeing that particular problem but I have a couple of customers who have seen some strange messages and I cannot find any useful docs on %SYS-SP- or %OIR-SP-, the key here is ANY error messages with -SP-. Hate opening cases cause I can't find simple info but... Dave Michael Williams wrote: I had a Cat6500 setup in the basement and was using for testing on various things. We moved it up into our Data Center. I wiped NVRAM on both Sup engines (separately), and not it's booted up and running on the Sup in slot 2 (with the Sup in slot 1 (supposedly) in standby mode). From the console, I get this repeating error message: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 1 is set off (admin reque) I never received this message the entire time I was using in the basement. I'm going to go and shut it down, yank the two Sups and reseat them just to make sure they're okay Just curious to see if there was any specific cause for this message. I searched Cisco's site to no avail. Thanks! Mike W. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29432t=29411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hsrp/ospf/eigrp for redundant internet [7:29417]
This isn't a job for HSRP. HSRP provides redundancy from end-station clients to their default gateway. The clients' default gateway(s) must be in the same subnet as the clients. It doesn't sound like that would be the case for any of the non-local routers. It sounds like a job for a routing protocol. IGRP claims to figure out a candidate default route. Would it dynamically select a new route when the Internet interface went down? Or how about using OSPF and its ability to interject Type 4 routes to Autonomous System Boundary Routers? You could probably do this without a routing protocol too with a backup command of some sort of a floating static (default) route. OK, so I'm waving my hands here. ;-) But I can say for sure that you're barking up the wrong tree with HSRP. Priscilla At 05:51 PM 12/17/01, Patrick Ramsey wrote: Ok guys/gals, I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone that cares to respond. we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other facillites. Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's thanks! -Patrick Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29434t=29417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame relay switching question [7:29435]
I have a little lab set up to play around with frame-relay traffic shaping. I have 3 2501's linked up, with the one in the middle configured as a frame relay switch. Is there a way to configure the middle router to insert fecns and becns as it switches the traffic? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29435t=29435 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
Here's what I found so far, if anybody wants to fill in a few blanks... Cat 4000/5000/6000 Aquired with Crescendo uses XDI/CatOS Cat 3000 Aquired with Kalpana menu (although I don't know if you can bypass the menu to enter commands) Cat 1900/2800 Aquired with Grand Junction Menu (although I THINK you can bypass the menu to enter commands) Cat 2900XL Cisco Internal development IOS-like Cat 8500 Cisco Internal development No idea what the CLI looks like, but Clark's book seems in indicate that it was developed with the CatOS in mind... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/17/2001 3:37 PM Subject: RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] By the way Dennis - if you truly want to find the demarcation point, search all of Cisco's old press releases. You'll find the origins of each switch and understand the different OS supported by each. I found it fascinating research when I did it... -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dennis Laganiere Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: IOS-Based Cat 1900 series Cat 2820 series Cat 2900XL series Set-based Cat5000 series Cat 6000 series Cat 6500 series Cat 2900 However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. Does that sound right? --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29436t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hsrp/ospf/eigrp for redundant internet [7:29417]
yeah I think that was the consensous. : ) I'm going to do some more reading and research this a bit more. From what I can tell I think the simplest will be the floating static default route. thanks! (and to everyone else!) -Patrick Priscilla Oppenheimer 12/17/01 07:11PM This isn't a job for HSRP. HSRP provides redundancy from end-station clients to their default gateway. The clients' default gateway(s) must be in the same subnet as the clients. It doesn't sound like that would be the case for any of the non-local routers. It sounds like a job for a routing protocol. IGRP claims to figure out a candidate default route. Would it dynamically select a new route when the Internet interface went down? Or how about using OSPF and its ability to interject Type 4 routes to Autonomous System Boundary Routers? You could probably do this without a routing protocol too with a backup command of some sort of a floating static (default) route. OK, so I'm waving my hands here. ;-) But I can say for sure that you're barking up the wrong tree with HSRP. Priscilla At 05:51 PM 12/17/01, Patrick Ramsey wrote: Ok guys/gals, I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone that cares to respond. we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other facillites. Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's thanks! -Patrick Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29437t=29417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Error on Cat6500..... [7:29411]
Here's what happened. As I mentioned before, I cleared the NVRAM on both Sups separately. But, when I issued a 'reload' on Sup#1 after clearing, it failed over to Sup#2, and that's when I started getting this error. So, I powered it down, pulled and reseated both Sups, and turned it back on. Now the Power light on BOTH sups was red, and lo and behold, when I cleared NVRAM, I forgot to give it a boot system sup-bootflash:blahblah, so it booted the Sup to rommon. SO, the moral of the story is, if you get the above error, it's because the standy Sup has booted into rommon. =) Once I realized that, I consoled into Sup1, gave the boot command, let it boot, and changed the bootvar to have it boot from the IOS image in Sup-bootflash. Then I did the same on Sup#2. Problem solved =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29438t=29411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
First off, let me say Shame on me for not being clear enough. There were indeed other 2900 models that were set based, like a 2-slot Cat5000 but you couldn't change the hardware. I have one of those, it's a Catalyst 2901. But these were before the XL series. As fas as my comment about the newer switches being deeper and using a DB9 console port, I may be confusing those with older 1900s instead of 2900s. Just let me know if I can spread anymore misinformation =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29439t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE SECURITY WORK BOOK [7:29429]
try a search site like www.mysimon.com.. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, CRG wrote: I am planning on purchasing the CCIE SECURITY WORK BOOK for a Christmas gift. Any one have any feedback on this book or know of a cheaper price than $200? *** Employment Consultant CRG Executive Search Rescue Placement Office: 954-677-9912 Fax: 888-624-8659 *** [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Chess.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29440t=29429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hsrp/ospf/eigrp for redundant internet [7:29417]
in its most simple form, without a routing protocol, you could at each site go; ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 internet connected interface ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 enterprise connected interface 200 Then of course with internet traffic cruising your normally private network, some security auditing may be in order, depending on your setup. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: yeah I think that was the consensous. : ) I'm going to do some more reading and research this a bit more. From what I can tell I think the simplest will be the floating static default route. thanks! (and to everyone else!) -Patrick Priscilla Oppenheimer 12/17/01 07:11PM This isn't a job for HSRP. HSRP provides redundancy from end-station clients to their default gateway. The clients' default gateway(s) must be in the same subnet as the clients. It doesn't sound like that would be the case for any of the non-local routers. It sounds like a job for a routing protocol. IGRP claims to figure out a candidate default route. Would it dynamically select a new route when the Internet interface went down? Or how about using OSPF and its ability to interject Type 4 routes to Autonomous System Boundary Routers? You could probably do this without a routing protocol too with a backup command of some sort of a floating static (default) route. OK, so I'm waving my hands here. ;-) But I can say for sure that you're barking up the wrong tree with HSRP. Priscilla At 05:51 PM 12/17/01, Patrick Ramsey wrote: Ok guys/gals, I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone that cares to respond. we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other facillites. Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's thanks! -Patrick Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29441t=29417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame relay switching question [7:29435]
afaik, NO. However you can set up DE (discard eligibility) limit and when that threshold is reached, you can see it on debugs as well as on sh frame PVC (total in DE's out DE's) Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29442t=29435 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29375]
Well, the 2 yr. limit exists because the certification itself expires in 2 yrs. So if u begin ur ccnp today by going for 1 of the tests, the new version of that test usually comes out in 2 yrs time, by which if u have or have not finished ur ccnp, ur certification has retired. Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29443t=29375 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
How does this look? Any corrections would be appreciated... Set-based Switches 7 Catalyst 1200 Series 7 Catalyst 2901 7 Catalyst 2902 7 Catalyst 2926T/F 7 Catalyst 2926GS/L 7 Catalyst 2948G 7 Catalyst 2980G 7 Catalyst 4000 Series 7 Catalyst 5000 Series 7 Catalyst 5500 Series 7 Catalyst 6000 Series 7 Catalyst 6500 Series 7 Catalyst 8500 Series IOS-like Switches 7 Catalyst 2912XL 7 Catalyst 2924XL 7 Catalyst 3550 Series 7 Catalyst 3500XL Series 7 Catalyst 2950 Series Menu Setup 7 Catalyst 1700 Series 7 Catalyst 1900 Series 7 Catalyst 2100 Series 7 Catalyst 2800 Series 7 Catalyst 2820 Series 7 Catalyst 3000 7 Catalyst 3100 7 Catalyst 3200 Switch Routers 7 Catalyst 2948G-L3 7 Catalyst 4840G 7 Catalyst 4908G-L3 Token Ring Switch 7 Catalyst 3900 7 Catalyst 2600 Other 7 Catalyst 6000 Series Switches Running Native IOS Let me know ... -=- Dennis -Original Message- From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] First off, let me say Shame on me for not being clear enough. There were indeed other 2900 models that were set based, like a 2-slot Cat5000 but you couldn't change the hardware. I have one of those, it's a Catalyst 2901. But these were before the XL series. As fas as my comment about the newer switches being deeper and using a DB9 console port, I may be confusing those with older 1900s instead of 2900s. Just let me know if I can spread anymore misinformation =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29444t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I mean the etherchannel of ranging of the multi-device ! [7:29445]
3500-3500-3500-3500(3500 stacks) |||| 3500-3500-3500-3500(3500 stacks) The 4 links between the two stacks are etherchannels, is it available? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29445t=29445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I mean the etherchannel of ranging of the multi-device ! [7:29446]
it would have to be limited to a switch by switch basis. FYI, you are maxed out on STP hops. cage wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 3500-3500-3500-3500(3500 stacks) |||| 3500-3500-3500-3500(3500 stacks) The 4 links between the two stacks are etherchannels, is it available? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29446t=29446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco academy's routing skills final ,tough!!! [7:29212]
looks like my message is moving further into the archives. But a hot subject nontheless. I wanted it to be more of a heads up to all who are about to take on sem5 . Don't think of advance routing as a course to run through just to reach a designation of ccnp and hopefully ccie. It cant work for you that way. I bit off more than I can chew by spreading myself too thin . That will be remedied. They are good skills to master and will benefit for the obvious reasons. Sounds like Prof. lisa knows what up and will but quality as well quantity of students out in the field. Thanks!for everyones input!! Brian, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29447t=29212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco academy's routing skills final ,tough!!! [7:29212]
looks like my message is moving further into the archives. But a hot subject nontheless. I wanted it to be more of a heads up to all who are about to take on sem5 . Don't think of advance routing as a course to run through just to reach a designation of ccnp and hopefully ccie. It cant work for you that way. I bit off more than I can chew by spreading myself too thin . That will be remedied. They are good skills to master and will benefit for the obvious reasons. Sounds like Prof. lisa knows what up and will but quality as well quantity of students out in the field. Thanks!for everyones input!! Brian, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29448t=29212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29449]
Thanks for your reply! You meant, CCNA had 3 years to expire, but CCNP had only 2 years, right? Oh! I never knows that, I had thought that expiration of CCNP was also 3 years!! But how comes, if I start my ccnp exam in 2002, while the exams will be upgraded in 2003? Would I have only 1 year time to finished all my ccnp exams? Even I pass, will my certifications be retired after 2003's ccnp exam upgrade? It's quite a confused question... thanks again for your kindness reply! Regards, Patrick MCSE, MCDBA, CCNA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick S. Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29375] Well, the 2 yr. limit exists because the certification itself expires in 2 yrs. So if u begin ur ccnp today by going for 1 of the tests, the new version of that test usually comes out in 2 yrs time, by which if u have or have not finished ur ccnp, ur certification has retired. Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29449t=29449 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
Cat 3000 Menu only. Also sold as the CiscoPro EtherSwitch CPW1601. Cat5K Acquired with Crescendo. Cat 4000 and 6000 series developed after it became Cisco. Looking at a 1996 Cisco Catalog I also find: Cat 2600 Token Ring switch. Cat 1900 Cat 1800 Token Ring switch. Cat 1600 Token Ring switch. Cat 1200 Eight Ethernet ports. RJ-45 or fiber connectors. FDDI uplink modules. -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] Here's what I found so far, if anybody wants to fill in a few blanks... Cat 4000/5000/6000 Aquired with Crescendo uses XDI/CatOS Cat 3000 Aquired with Kalpana menu (although I don't know if you can bypass the menu to enter commands) Cat 1900/2800 Aquired with Grand Junction Menu (although I THINK you can bypass the menu to enter commands) Cat 2900XL Cisco Internal development IOS-like Cat 8500 Cisco Internal development No idea what the CLI looks like, but Clark's book seems in indicate that it was developed with the CatOS in mind... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/17/2001 3:37 PM Subject: RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] By the way Dennis - if you truly want to find the demarcation point, search all of Cisco's old press releases. You'll find the origins of each switch and understand the different OS supported by each. I found it fascinating research when I did it... -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dennis Laganiere Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: IOS-Based Cat 1900 series Cat 2820 series Cat 2900XL series Set-based Cat5000 series Cat 6000 series Cat 6500 series Cat 2900 However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. Does that sound right? --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29450t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29451]
Hi Patrick, In respective of the date you started any of your CCNP or CCDP track, you are certified on the very date you wrote the last exam in each of the serials. eg If I write Routing 2.0 on 1/1/2001 and wrote the other two any date in between, but for one reason or the other I now write the last exam say CIT 3.0 on 1/1/2003. You will become CCNP on 1/1/2003 ie if you passed CIT 3.0 and the two years expiration of your certicate start counting from 1/1/2003 not 1/1/2001 when you first wrote the exam. However, you might be having a problem if the course you are yet to write get upgraded, it means, you probably are going to buy new books, look for new exam scenerios, would not have a familar exam format and all that. Apart from that, you will still be on course. If for example one of the exams you have written got upgraded before you complete all four, you are not required to go back and write that exam again, you have passed it already and it still count towards your credit. Another thing you also have to bear in mind is that, Cisco normally upgrade the whole certificate at interval of times, eg the current CCNA v2 was upgraded June 2000 from v1. I donot know the current version of CCNP we have now, assuming it is version 2, and you were not able to upgrade before say version 3 came up, You will still have the version 2 exams available for you to write at the end of the day, you will have CCNP v2 for you to get CCNP v3, you have to write just one upgrade exam and that is all., so your CCNP v2 by that exam would be upgraded to CCNP v3. Good luck Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Patrick Zhou To: Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: RE: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29449] Thanks for your reply! You meant, CCNA had 3 years to expire, but CCNP had only 2 years, right? Oh! I never knows that, I had thought that expiration of CCNP was also 3 years!! But how comes, if I start my ccnp exam in 2002, while the exams will be upgraded in 2003? Would I have only 1 year time to finished all my ccnp exams? Even I pass, will my certifications be retired after 2003's ccnp exam upgrade? It's quite a confused question... thanks again for your kindness reply! Regards, Patrick MCSE, MCDBA, CCNA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick S. Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29375] Well, the 2 yr. limit exists because the certification itself expires in 2 yrs. So if u begin ur ccnp today by going for 1 of the tests, the new version of that test usually comes out in 2 yrs time, by which if u have or have not finished ur ccnp, ur certification has retired. Nick _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29451t=29451 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29452]
Hi Godswill, Thank you very much! Your answer is very clear! From your mail, I learned: 1. The CCNP's expiration is two years. 2. We can write CCNP V2 exams and CCNP v3 exams mixed, but we can only get the CCNP V2 certification. 3. After we get CCNP V2 certification, we can upgrade to V3 with an upgrade exam. Is it all I should know? Thanks again for your kindness!! Regards, Patrick -Original Message- From: Godswill HO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:02 PM To: Patrick Zhou; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29449] Hi Patrick, In respective of the date you started any of your CCNP or CCDP track, you are certified on the very date you wrote the last exam in each of the serials. eg If I write Routing 2.0 on 1/1/2001 and wrote the other two any date in between, but for one reason or the other I now write the last exam say CIT 3.0 on 1/1/2003. You will become CCNP on 1/1/2003 ie if you passed CIT 3.0 and the two years expiration of your certicate start counting from 1/1/2003 not 1/1/2001 when you first wrote the exam. However, you might be having a problem if the course you are yet to write get upgraded, it means, you probably are going to buy new books, look for new exam scenerios, would not have a familar exam format and all that. Apart from that, you will still be on course. If for example one of the exams you have written got upgraded before you complete all four, you are not required to go back and write that exam again, you have passed it already and it still count towards your credit. Another thing you also have to bear in mind is that, Cisco normally upgrade the whole certificate at interval of times, eg the current CCNA v2 was upgraded June 2000 from v1. I donot know the current version of CCNP we have now, assuming it is version 2, and you were not able to upgrade before say version 3 came up, You will still have the version 2 exams available for you to write at the end of the day, you will have CCNP v2 for you to get CCNP v3, you have to write just one upgrade exam and that is all., so your CCNP v2 by that exam would be upgraded to CCNP v3. Good luck Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Patrick Zhou To: Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: RE: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29449] Thanks for your reply! You meant, CCNA had 3 years to expire, but CCNP had only 2 years, right? Oh! I never knows that, I had thought that expiration of CCNP was also 3 years!! But how comes, if I start my ccnp exam in 2002, while the exams will be upgraded in 2003? Would I have only 1 year time to finished all my ccnp exams? Even I pass, will my certifications be retired after 2003's ccnp exam upgrade? It's quite a confused question... thanks again for your kindness reply! Regards, Patrick MCSE, MCDBA, CCNA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick S. Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is there a time limited for taking all the CCNP ex [7:29375] Well, the 2 yr. limit exists because the certification itself expires in 2 yrs. So if u begin ur ccnp today by going for 1 of the tests, the new version of that test usually comes out in 2 yrs time, by which if u have or have not finished ur ccnp, ur certification has retired. Nick _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29452t=29452 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: Error on Cat6500..... [7:29411]
across a nifty tool I never knew existed. Cisco has an Error Message Decoder utility on their site that can be accessed by clicking on the following link: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Errordecoder/home.pl (You need to log into Cisco's site in order to use this tool). This, and many other handy utilities and tools can be found in the Technical Assistance Center section of Cisco's website under the Tool Index that can be found at this handy link: http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/support/tac/t_index.shtml This index of available tools is something also that I didn't know existed. Note that the tools available will differ depending on what account type (if any) you are logged in with... -- Leigh Anne PS. Not surprisingly since you couldn't find anything on Michael's problem on Cisco's site, the Error Message Decoder didn't have anything on this message in its database... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Williams Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Error on Cat6500. [7:29411] Here's what happened. As I mentioned before, I cleared the NVRAM on both Sups separately. But, when I issued a 'reload' on Sup#1 after clearing, it failed over to Sup#2, and that's when I started getting this error. So, I powered it down, pulled and reseated both Sups, and turned it back on. Now the Power light on BOTH sups was red, and lo and behold, when I cleared NVRAM, I forgot to give it a boot system sup-bootflash:blahblah, so it booted the Sup to rommon. SO, the moral of the story is, if you get the above error, it's because the standy Sup has booted into rommon. =) Once I realized that, I consoled into Sup1, gave the boot command, let it boot, and changed the bootvar to have it boot from the IOS image in Sup-bootflash. Then I did the same on Sup#2. Problem solved =) Mike W. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Error on Cat6500. [7:29411] Funny you mention that. I'm not seeing that particular problem but I have a couple of customers who have seen some strange messages and I cannot find any useful docs on %SYS-SP- or %OIR-SP-, the key here is ANY error messages with -SP-. Hate opening cases cause I can't find simple info but... Dave Michael Williams wrote: I had a Cat6500 setup in the basement and was using for testing on various things. We moved it up into our Data Center. I wiped NVRAM on both Sup engines (separately), and not it's booted up and running on the Sup in slot 2 (with the Sup in slot 1 (supposedly) in standby mode). From the console, I get this repeating error message: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 1 is set off (admin reque) I never received this message the entire time I was using in the basement. I'm going to go and shut it down, yank the two Sups and reseat them just to make sure they're okay Just curious to see if there was any specific cause for this message. I searched Cisco's site to no avail. Thanks! Mike W. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29453t=29411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE SECURITY WORK BOOK [7:29429]
I purchased this book while it was yet a beta release. It has been very useful for me. CRG wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am planning on purchasing the CCIE SECURITY WORK BOOK for a Christmas gift. Any one have any feedback on this book or know of a cheaper price than $200? *** Employment Consultant CRG Executive Search Rescue Placement Office: 954-677-9912 Fax: 888-624-8659 *** [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Chess.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29454t=29429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391]
Just a quick note on the 1900s. The old 1900c switches, (size of a pizza box) and db-9 console port were menu driven. the 1924-A standard edition (software upgradeable to Enterprise edition) and enterprise catalyst switches (1924-EN), you can choose IOS from the menu and is just like a 2924xl. They are half the size of the older models, and they have an rj45 console port. (9.00.004) is the latest revision Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29455t=29391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X.28 to ip conversion [7:29456]
Dear Group, I have a requirement which is mentioned below:- The link is like this.. .. Kiosk --R1---Modem IP cloud.---IP host The kiosk has got a RS232 port which is connected to my router (R1) Ethernet port (via RS232 to RJ45 cable). On the serial interface of router modem is connected it is dialing to an IP network reaching to a host which runs on IP. The kiosk is sending me X.28 packets from its RS232 port to my Ethernet port of R1. My question is how do I make conversion from X.28 to IP so that my Ethernet port will understand. Finally these packets will be sent to the IP host in IP format only. Or what solution do I implement for the same. Earlier I tried with serial to IP converter hardware device (between kiosk R1) Now I want to do it without this hardware. Any suggestions... Thanx in Advance.. Sonu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29456t=29456 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Metro Ethernet [7:29457]
Hello, Anyone has experience with Metro Ethernet? Is it good? (on pricing, availability, QOS etc.)? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29457t=29457 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
