Cisco equipment [7:33664]
Hai, I would like to purchase some second hand equipment for HOME lab. I got the following quotation from one of the vendor. NM-8A/S $ 750.00 NM-4A/S $ 400.00 WIC-2T $ 450.00 WS-C1924-A $ 400.00 ws-C2924-XL-EN $ 750.00 Cisco1603 $ 225.00 Cisco2501 $ 285.00 Cisco2610 $ 775.00 Please suggest me, should I buy the products at this price or any other place I can get at cheper price. Thanks kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33664&t=33664 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
Come on mate where's your sense of humour. BTW Jason is right the mouse new it was in for a hard time when it saw me so it bolted. As for Brussels you do not see any equipment, you are just sat in a classroom with keyboard, monitor, mouse (sometimes), pens, pencils, sharpener , rubber (eraser for the Americans) and paper. You can wander off at any time to get yourself a "free" can of coke or tea / coffee. I would advise this as you may as well bloat yourself with liquid as the lunch is a buffet selection of continental type rolls. For us Brits sweet rolls with some form of strange meat on them doesn't really appeal, in fact they were quite rancid. I couldn't find a decent roll despite my 6 times of trying. Next time I'm going to bring in a packed lunch, with a Capri Sun just for luck. Cat5000,Cat3924,2600's,3600. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2002 04:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor too much. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except in RTP they said not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already calibrated it before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > tone/ring on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that most of the equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken the new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers did you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? What models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it still the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > work on it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > _ > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com >_ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33665&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Route map [7:33429]
Rock, If you have intf s0 to ISP1(desired) and intf s1 to ISP2, I would try "Set int s0 s1" after the match clause. If s0 is up-up, it uses ISP1, if it goes down then it uses s1 (ISP2). At least is should be so... Constantin Tivig mcse,ccna blablabla -Original Message- From: BASSOLE Rock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 5:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Route map [7:33429] Hi group, I would like to define a route-map on a router to forward certain packets (defined by the ACL 101) to 2 different next-hop address. I use 2 next-hop addresses to avoid the single point of failure. The 2 next-hop addresses are directly attached to the router. The first next-hop address 10.10.10.10, the primary gateway, would be used to forward all packet maching ACL 101. If the primary went down then the second next-hop 11.11.11.11, the backup, would be used to forward all packets maching ACL 101. Would the following route-map do as I want? route-map test permit 10 match ip address 101 set ip next-hop 10.10.10.10 set ip next-hop 11.11.11.11 access-list 101 permit ip any host 10.10.12.12 Any information is welcome. Thank you all. Rock BASSOLE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33666&t=33429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: term no mon command [7:33658]
Hi Stuart, I think (?) that term no mon only applies to vty lines. Therefore you should use : conf t no logging console ^z Hope this helps Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33667&t=33658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN Solution -help needed [7:33668]
I have a 1601 with BRI Wic and 3COM hub with 4 users.There is only 1 ISDN BRI.I need all four users to access the main office but use the ip pool on the main 3640. Any ideas Thanks _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33668&t=33668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: term no mon command [7:33658]
no logging console CM - Original Message - From: "Stuart Laubstein" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:12 AM Subject: term no mon command [7:33658] > I have a 3620 and I have to work on the console port but I am swamped with > messages every few seconds as people try to log in via the pri. I used the > term no mon command but it doesnt work--I still get connect messages etc. > Does anyone have an idea where these message come from and how I can shut > them off. We are using 12.0(7) XK1 Early Deployment release. > > thanks > > stuart Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33669&t=33658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router doesn't hold Enable Passwrod [7:33645]
enable secret xyz - Original Message - From: "Gerd Thuemmler" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:36 AM Subject: Re: Router doesn't hold Enable Passwrod [7:33645] > Hi, > > In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > > The Syntax I entered is below > > ( > > config t > > en password password > > ) > > ...try: ena pass xyz > > > Gerd Thuemmler > Berlin, Germany Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33670&t=33645 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Router Integration with Ace Server for SecurID [7:33671]
hi, I have cisco 2621 with IOS (Firewall, Plus features and 56-bit IPSec encryption) feature set. I have client to site VPN established by the remote users with this VPN router. The users should have an external authentication using secure id. I tried configuring the ace server to work as an radius server and integrating directly with checkpoint firewall and this setup works fine I want to integrate the same ace server to work with the above router. I had added the normal aaa commands but the users are not asked for any authentication and they can access the local network after establishng the VPN. Can anyone give me sample config on intergrating the radius server with the router. --- With Best Regards Imran Obaidullah.M --- _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33671&t=33671 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: term no mon command [7:33658]
There are 4 places logging information is sent; via the monitor, the console, SNMP, and a buffer. Each logging destination can be likened to 4 different views. In each view you can control the amount or severity of the logging information (debug, informational, notification, warn, errors, alerts, critical, emergencies). When you enable a view to have a certain logging level, it enables all higher logging level messages as well to be outputted to the view. When you plug a terminal into the console port with an async cable this is called the console view (line con 0). The command 'logging console ' controls the severity of logging information sent to the console. You can totally disable all logging to the console with the command 'no logging console'. When you telnet to an active interface on the router this is called the monitor view (line vty 0 4 and line aux 0). The command 'logging monitor ' controls the severity of logging information sent to the monitor. By default, you need to type 'terminal monitor' to actually activate this view when you telnet. You can totally disable all logging to the monitor with the command 'no logging monitor'. When you configure the router to output logging information to a syslog server with 'logging ' this is called the buffered view. The command 'logging trap ' controls the severity of logging information sent to the buffer. You can totally disable all logging to the console with the command 'no logging trap'. When you configure the router to output logging information to a SNMP network management station with 'snmp-server host ' this is called the SNMP view. The command 'logging history ' controls the severity of logging information sent via SNMP. You can totally disable all logging via SNMP with the command 'no logging history '. Note: For the SNMP view you must explicitly disallow the logging severity level. If you need more information on the use of all of the logging levels and what information is actually printed at each level take a look at the troubleshooting commands guide http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/fun_r /frprt3/frtroubl.htm (watch the line wrap) Good Luck! WAYNE BAETY, MCSE, A1C, USAF Network Systems Trainer > -Original Message- > From: Stuart Laubstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: term no mon command [7:33658] > > I have a 3620 and I have to work on the console port but I am swamped with > messages every few seconds as people try to log in via the pri. I used the > term no mon command but it doesnt work--I still get connect messages etc. > Does anyone have an idea where these message come from and how I can shut > them off. We are using 12.0(7) XK1 Early Deployment release. > > thanks > > stuart Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33672&t=33658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
I love Cisco's free soda's and waters. It's got to be one of the best perks! ""McCallum, Robert"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Come on mate where's your sense of humour. > > BTW Jason is right the mouse new it was in for a hard time when it saw me so > it bolted. > > As for Brussels you do not see any equipment, you are just sat in a > classroom with keyboard, monitor, mouse (sometimes), pens, pencils, > sharpener , rubber (eraser for the Americans) and paper. You can wander off > at any time to get yourself a "free" can of coke or tea / coffee. I would > advise this > as you may as well bloat yourself with liquid as the lunch is a buffet > selection of continental type rolls. For us Brits sweet rolls with some > form of strange meat on them doesn't really appeal, in fact they were quite > rancid. I couldn't find a decent roll despite my 6 times of trying. Next > time > I'm going to bring in a packed lunch, with a Capri Sun just for luck. > > Cat5000,Cat3924,2600's,3600. > > -Original Message- > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 January 2002 04:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to > 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have > wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. > > >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan > 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor > too much. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, > January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent > One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except > in RTP they said not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already > calibrated it before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in > message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. > In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle > you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > tone/ring > on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 > PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab > Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a > monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that most of the > equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: > Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? > [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken the > new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers did > you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? What > models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it still > the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > work on > it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > http://www.hotmail.com > >_ >Do You > Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33674&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: term no mon command [7:33658]
very extensive explaination. and one more doubt is for the buffered view, having 'logging traps' command to control the size and severity level, but what the command 'logging buffer' and 'command logging facility' used for? thanks, -Original Message- From: Baety Wayne A1C 18 CS/SCBX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 2002e941f 30f% 18:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: term no mon command [7:33658] There are 4 places logging information is sent; via the monitor, the console, SNMP, and a buffer. Each logging destination can be likened to 4 different views. In each view you can control the amount or severity of the logging information (debug, informational, notification, warn, errors, alerts, critical, emergencies). When you enable a view to have a certain logging level, it enables all higher logging level messages as well to be outputted to the view. When you plug a terminal into the console port with an async cable this is called the console view (line con 0). The command 'logging console ' controls the severity of logging information sent to the console. You can totally disable all logging to the console with the command 'no logging console'. When you telnet to an active interface on the router this is called the monitor view (line vty 0 4 and line aux 0). The command 'logging monitor ' controls the severity of logging information sent to the monitor. By default, you need to type 'terminal monitor' to actually activate this view when you telnet. You can totally disable all logging to the monitor with the command 'no logging monitor'. When you configure the router to output logging information to a syslog server with 'logging ' this is called the buffered view. The command 'logging trap ' controls the severity of logging information sent to the buffer. You can totally disable all logging to the console with the command 'no logging trap'. When you configure the router to output logging information to a SNMP network management station with 'snmp-server host ' this is called the SNMP view. The command 'logging history ' controls the severity of logging information sent via SNMP. You can totally disable all logging via SNMP with the command 'no logging history '. Note: For the SNMP view you must explicitly disallow the logging severity level. If you need more information on the use of all of the logging levels and what information is actually printed at each level take a look at the troubleshooting commands guide http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/fun_r /frprt3/frtroubl.htm (watch the line wrap) Good Luck! WAYNE BAETY, MCSE, A1C, USAF Network Systems Trainer > -Original Message- > From: Stuart Laubstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: term no mon command [7:33658] > > I have a 3620 and I have to work on the console port but I am swamped with > messages every few seconds as people try to log in via the pri. I used the > term no mon command but it doesnt work--I still get connect messages etc. > Does anyone have an idea where these message come from and how I can shut > them off. We are using 12.0(7) XK1 Early Deployment release. > > thanks > > stuart Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33675&t=33658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route map [7:33429]
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, BASSOLE Rock wrote: > The first next-hop address 10.10.10.10, the primary gateway, would be used > to forward all packet maching ACL 101. If the primary went down then the > second next-hop 11.11.11.11, the backup, would be used to forward all > packets maching ACL 101. If you have CDP information from the two upstream routers, you could write a route-map using the 'verify-availability' command. Take a look at the following example and URL: route-map MOVE-STUFF permit 10 match ip address 101 set ip next-hop 192.168.0.1 set ip next-hop verify-availability route-map MOVE-STUFF permit 20 match ip address 101 set ip next-hop 192.168.1.1 http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/switch_c/xcprt3/xcdnfc.htm I have no idea if this works, I just noticed it fiddling with next-hops last week. Rgds, - I. -- Ian Henderson CCNA, CCNP Network Engineer, iiNet Limited Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33676&t=33429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: is it possible to bridge accross a tunnel? [7:33567]
I hate to admit it, but yes, I've seen this work (we needed to get 802.1q VLANs across a link that couldn't handle them). Ugly as sin, though :). Rgds, - I. On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, JEK wrote: > Well guys I think that should do it for the config, tell me if anything > looks wrong. > Also as a side note you may also want to use an ACL in the range of 700-799 > (MAC Address Acl) to limit what traffic that you want to be sent over the > dlsw > circuits. I hope this info helps and all my syntax is correct. Thanks, > > - jek > > Router A > ! > hostname RouterA > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.10.10.254 > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.10.20.254 > dlsw bridge-group 1 > ! > interface Tunnel0 > ip unnumbered Ethern0 > tunnel source Ethernet0 > tunnel destination 128.29.183.247 > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 10.10.10.254 255.255.255.0 > bridge-group 1 > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 128.29.182.247 255.255.255.252 > ! > bridge 1 protocol ieee > bridge 1 route ip > no bridge 1 bridge ip > ! > > > Router B > ! > hostname RouterB > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.10.20.254 > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.10.10.254 > dlsw bridge-group 1 > ! > interface Tunnel0 > ip unnumbered Ethern0 > tunnel source Ethernet0 > tunnel destination 128.29.182.247 > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 10.10.20.254 255.255.255.0 > bridge-group 1 > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 128.29.183.247 255.255.255.252 > ! > bridge 1 protocol ieee > bridge 1 route ip > no bridge 1 bridge ip > ! > > > > wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > how do you configure this with dlsw? > > > > 10.10.10.x --(R1)--(public network)--(R2)---10.10.10.x > > > > > > ""Jason"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Is this something you just want to do for the sake of doing? If so, I > say > > > have at it. Will it work, don't know. I have never tried it. If you > are > > > looking to do this to fulfill a production requirement I would question > > why > > > you weren't looking at using DLSW? > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > Eric Waguespack > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:38 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: is it possible to bridge accross a tunnel? [7:33567] > > > > > > > > > ok, I have looked into this, and supposedly the answer > > > is "yes" but the config is "unsupported" > > > > > > here is the network diagram > > > > > > > > > 10.10.10.x --(R1)--(public network)--(R2)---10.10.10.x > > > > > > this is supposed to do it but i can't seem to make it > > > work: > > > > > > >int tunnel 2 > > > >no ip addr > > > >tunnel source eth 0 > > > >tunnel destination 128.29.183.247 > > > >bridge-group 1 > > > > > > > > > should this work? what will work? anything? do i need > > > to do l2f instead? what did you have for breakfast? > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > -Eric > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! > > > http://auctions.yahoo.com -- Ian Henderson CCNA, CCNP Network Engineer, iiNet Limited Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33678&t=33567 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router doesn't hold Enable Passwrod [7:33645]
Do you have an Enable Secret password set? The Enable password is mainly
still around for support of older IOS code. Cisco is trying to move
everyone to using Enable Secret.
Have you tried typing out the full command: enable password password?
What is your configuration register set to 0x2102 or 0x2142? If is set to
0x2142, the router will ignore the startup-config which contains the Enable
and Enable Secret passwords.
If that does not fix the problem, I am out of ideas.
--
"Through Complexity there is Simplicity,
Through Simplicity there is Complexity"
David L. Blair - CCNP, CCNA, MCSE, CBE, A+, 3Wizard
""Washington Rico"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I appreciate any information you may have..
>
> I have a 3600 was IOS version 12.0.7 and I was trying to create the enable
> password. I believe I did it correctly but the router does not hold the
> enable password, it just goes directly into enable mode when I type
> ("enable"). Even after I create an enable password, anyone know why?
>
> The Syntax I entered is below
> (
> config t
> en password password
> )
>
>
> Thank in advance..
>
>
>
> _
> お店よりも気軽に！好きなモノ好きなだけ見られる MSN
ショッピング
> http://shopping.msn.co.jp/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33679&t=33645
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Router Integration with Ace Server for SecurID [7:33681]
hi, I have cisco 2621 with IOS (Firewall, Plus features and 56-bit IPSec encryption) feature set. I have client to site VPN established by the remote users with this VPN router. The users should have an external authentication using secure id. I tried configuring the ace server to work as an radius server and integrating directly with checkpoint firewall and this setup works fine I want to integrate the same ace server to work with the above router. I had added the normal aaa commands but the users are not asked for any authentication and they can freely access the local network after establishng the VPN. Can anyone give me sample config on intergrating the radius server with the router. --- With Best Regards Imran Obaidullah.M --- _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33681&t=33681 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: [INFOCON] - UNIRAS Briefing - 23/02 - Cisco - CatOS Telnet [7:33682]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- - -- UNIRAS (UK Govt CERT) Briefing Notice - 23/02 dated 30.01.02 Time: 09:32 UNIRAS is part of NISCC(National Infrastructure Security Co-ordination Centre) - -- UNIRAS material is also available from its website at www.uniras.gov.uk and Information about NISCC is available from www.niscc.gov.uk - -- Title = Cisco CatOS Telnet Buffer Vulnerability Detail == - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco CatOS Telnet Buffer Vulnerability Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2002 January 29 at 1500 UTC - - --- Summary - - --- Some Cisco Catalyst switches, running certain CatOS based software releases, have a vulnerability wherein a buffer overflow in the telnet option handling can cause the telnet daemon to crash and result in a switch reload. This vulnerability can be exploited to initiate a denial of service (DoS) attack. This vulnerability is documented as Cisco bug ID CSCdw19195. There are workarounds available to mitigate the vulnerability. This advisory will be posted at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ catos-telrcv-vuln-pub.shtml . Affected Products - - - Cisco's various Catalyst family of switches run CatOS-based releases or IOS-based releases. IOS-based releases are not vulnerable. The following Cisco Catalyst Switches are vulnerable : * Catalyst 6000 series * Catalyst 5000 series * Catalyst 4000 series * Catalyst 2948G * Catalyst 2900 For the switches above, the following CatOS based switch software revisions are vulnerable. +--- --+ | | Release 4 | Release 5 | Release 6 | Release 7 | | | code base | code base | code base | code base | |---+---+---+--+ --| | Catalyst 6000 | Not | earlier than | earlier than | earlier than | | series| Applicable |5.5(13)|6.3(4)|7.1(2) | |---+---+---+--+ --| | Catalyst 5000 | earlier than | earlier than | earlier than | Not | | series| 4.5(13a)|5.5(13)|6.3(4)| Applicable | |---+---+---+--+ --| | Catalyst 4000 | All releases | earlier than | earlier than | earlier than | | series| |5.5(13)|6.3(4)|7.1(2) | +--- --+ To determine your software revision, type show version at the command line prompt. Not Affected Products - - - The following Cisco Catalyst Switches are not vulnerable : * Catalyst 8500 series * Catalyst 4800 series * Catalyst 4200 series * Catalyst 3900 series * Catalyst 3550 series * Catalyst 3500 XL series * Catalyst 4840G * Catalyst 4908G-l3 * Catalyst 2948G-l3 * Catalyst 2950 * Catalyst 2900 XL * Catalyst 2900 LRE XL * Catalyst 2820 * Catalyst 1900 No other Cisco product is currently known to be affected by this vulnerability. Details - - --- Some Cisco Catalyst switches, running certain CatOS-based software releases, have a vulnerability wherein a buffer overflow in the telnet option handling can cause the telnet daemon to crash and result in a switch reload. This vulnerability can be exploited to initiate a denial of service (DoS) attack. Once the switch has reloaded, it is still vulnerable and the attack can be repeated as long as the switch is IP reachable on port 23 and has not been upgraded to a fixed version of CatOS switch software. This vulnerability is documented as Cisco bug ID CSCdw19195, which requires a CCO account to view and can be viewed after 2002 January 30 at 1500 UTC. Impact - - -- This vulnerability can be exploited to produce a denial of service (DoS) attack. When the vulnerability is exploited it can cause the Cisco Catalyst switch to crash and reload. Software Versions and Fixes - - --- This vulnerability has been fixed in the following switch software revisions and the fix will be carried forward in all future releases. +--- + | | Release 4 | Release 5 | Release 6 | Release 7 | | | code base | code base | code base | code base | |---+---+---+---+--- | | Cat
Fw: Pbx Fundamentals [7:33680]
- Original Message - From: salimss To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:10 PM Subject: Pbx Fundamentals Could u pls answer the following questions. 1) The SIP protocol is based upon which other protocol model? a. H.323 b. MGCP c. HTTP/WWW d. HTML 2) Which of the following are common trunk circuit usage types? a. One way in only b. One way out only c. Two way in or out d. All of the above e. None of the above 3) The term "non-blocking" when applied to a PBX indicates: a. LCR is unable to restrict calls b. The number of trunks is equal or in excess of the number of stations c. Subscribers have access to all features such as call transfers, conference, call pickup d. The switch does not support Class of Service e. There are enough time-slots to support every station engaging in a call simultaneously 4) In the Europe, ___ line code is required for ISDN PRI. a. AMI b. HDB3 c. B8ZS d. HDLC 5) SS-7 is mandatory to provide national and international ISDN. a. True b. False 6) PBX proprietary private networking cannot be supported across the data network? a. True b. False 7) Circuit switched networks are very flexible and can easily adapt to handle new applications. a. True b. False 8) The component of a PBX that manages the use of timeslots/speech paths is the . a. Control complex b. Switching complex c. Terminal interface d. None of the above 9) ___ is/are an example(s) of Call Center data that can be collected from a PBX. a. Trunk a call entered on b. Length of time a call waited c. How long a caller talked to each agent d. All of the above 10) Cell based switching is more efficient than frame based switching. a. True b. False 11) Q.Sig as opposed to DPNSS does not require a D-channel. a. True b. False 12) E&M signaling is used for which of the following? a. Trunk groups from electromechanical offices b. Centrex tie lines c. Trunks for Centrex for private networks d. A multitude of private line applications e. B and C f. All of the above 13) In the ISDN LAP-D format, the _ bits identify which network entity should process the frame. a. Terminal Endpoint Identifier (TEI) b. Command/Response (C/R) c. Extended Address (EA) d. Service Access Point Identifier (SAPI) 14) The ability for a PBX system to account for usage costs is known as __. a. Call Detail Recording b. Station Message Detail Recording c. Call Accounting d. CDR e. All of the above Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33680&t=33680 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Telnet to inside through VPN [7:33589]
Try specifying the exact IP address of the PC from where you want to initiate the Telnet session and not the block of IP. Regard. Oletu - Original Message - From: Dante Martins To: Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:50 AM Subject: PIX: Telnet to inside through VPN [7:33589] > How can I telnet to PIX inside interface from the VPN (I.E. from > 10.128.128.0 telnet 172.16.3.252). > > I have tried using telnet command: > "telnet 10.128.128.0 inside" but still no working. > > Can you help me? > > Dante > > > > > CONF MAIN PIX > PIX Version 6.0(1) > nameif ethernet0 outside security0 > nameif ethernet1 inside security100 > nameif ethernet2 DMZ1 security10 > nameif ethernet3 intf3 security15 > nameif ethernet4 intf4 security20 > nameif ethernet5 intf5 security25 > enable password *** encrypted > passwd ** encrypted > hostname MAIN > fixup protocol ftp 21 > fixup protocol http 80 > fixup protocol h323 1720 > fixup protocol rsh 514 > fixup protocol smtp 25 > fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 > fixup protocol sip 5060 > fixup protocol skinny 2000 > names > access-list 101 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 172.16.3.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 102 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 192.168.3.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 103 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.250.1.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 103 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.249.0.0 > 255.255.240.0 > access-list 104 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.250.11.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 105 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.250.95.0 > 255.255.255.0 > pager lines 24 > logging on > interface ethernet0 auto > interface ethernet1 auto > interface ethernet2 auto > interface ethernet3 auto > interface ethernet4 auto shutdown > interface ethernet5 auto shutdown > mtu outside 1500 > mtu inside 1500 > mtu DMZ1 1500 > mtu intf3 1500 > mtu intf4 1500 > mtu intf5 1500 > ip address outside 200.219.100.2 255.255.255.0 > ip address inside 10.128.159.253 255.255.224.0 > ip address DMZ1 10.255.255.254 255.255.224.0 > ip address intf3 10.250.11.254 255.255.255.0 > ip address intf4 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 > ip address intf5 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 > ip audit info action alarm > ip audit attack action alarm > no failover > failover timeout 0:00:00 > failover poll 15 > failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address DMZ1 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address intf3 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address intf4 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address intf5 0.0.0.0 > pdm history enable > arp timeout 14400 > global (outside) 1 200.219.100.100-200.219.100.199 > global (outside) 1 200.219.100.200 > global (DMZ1) 1 10.255.224.10-10.255.224.70 > nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 > nat (DMZ1) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.26 10.255.224.3 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.31 10.255.224.9 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.54 10.255.224.4 255.255.255.255 > > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.26 10.128.128.26 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.31 10.128.128.32 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.54 10.128.128.54 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > > conduit permit icmp any any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.30 eq www any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.30 eq domain any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.30 eq domain any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.31 eq www any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.31 eq domain any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.31 eq domain any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.26 eq 161 any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.26 eq 162 any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.26 eq snmp any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.26 eq snmptrap any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.54 eq domain any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.54 eq domain any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.54 eq 22 any > > route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 200.219.100.1 1 > route outside 10.0.64.0 255.255.224.0 10.128.159.252 1 > timeout xlate 3:00:00 > timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 rpc 0:10:00 h323 > 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 > timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute > aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+ > aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius > snmp-server host inside 10.128.128.21 > snmp-server location mainsite > snmp-server contact support@mainsite > snmp-server community pixpix > snmp-server enable traps > floodguard enable > sysopt connection permit-ipsec > sysopt ipsec pl-compatible > no sysopt route dnat > > crypto ipsec transform-set strong esp-des esp-sha-hmac > crypto map cmap 1 ipsec-isakmp > crypto map cmap 1 match address 101 > crypto map cmap 1 set peer 200.200.100.2 > crypto map cmap 1 set transform-set strong > crypto map cmap 2 ipsec-isakmp > crypto map cmap 2 match address 102 > crypt
RE: BGP and one backup link [7:33433]
Some ISPs can be evil and ignore path stuffing for customers - happens here in .au a lot. One way I've found around it that works very well is BGP Conditional Advertisement. Basically it can 'see' if a route is in the routing table, and if it isn't, advertise more routes. So, if you stop seeing the default route from your usual provider, you can advertise your netblocks (specified by an ACL or a prefix-list) to a second provider. Outgoing traffic could be left to the floating static, or use the same method to advertise a default route to your customer routers/cores/whatever. Reasons I like it: Works across multiple routers; works even if the physical interface is up (floating statics wont, backup interfaces won't); can be easily 'swung' by shutting down BGP sessions without shutting physical interfaces; is a much cleaner solution than path stuffing (SOMEBODY out there has a longer path than you do :)). Take a look at: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/cond_adv.html Rgds, - I. On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Joseph Brunner wrote: > Sometimes As prepending won't work.. your best bet is to telnet > to route-views.oregon-ix.net (public route server) and do a show ip bgp with > your > as # (then you will know who is using your prepended path to get there. Most > likely > one peer of your backup link providers, sets local pref or metric > on a private peering arrangement, thereby nullifying your prepends. > Unfortunately > there is nothing you can do.. if you were a hi-cap T-3 or larger customer, > they > might traffic engineer this for you. > > Joseph Brunner > ASN 21572 > MortgageIT MITLending > New York, NY 10038 > (212) 651 - 7695 Voice > (212) 651 - 7795 Fax > > > > -Original Message- > From: Alejandro Acosta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: BGP and one backup link [7:33433] > > > Hi all, > I have a BGP question. > In this moment we have one Internet link with just one provider, now, we > have got a second link just for backup. I mean, we can only use it for 180 > hrs per month. > I can easily manage my outgoing traffic (using local preferece or weight), > however the incomming traffic in more difficult. I added many prepends (9) > in the publication of the second link but there still few traffic on it. > There is not IBGP between my two providers. > > Any ideas? > > Thks in advanced. > > Alejandro Acosta -- Ian Henderson CCNA, CCNP Network Engineer, iiNet Limited Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33677&t=33433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Telnet to inside through VPN [7:33589]
You can telnet to the outside of a pix. You have to use ipsec to do it, but it can be done as of 5.0 I am sure this is going to wrap, but this is how you do it with 5.1 http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v51/config/advanced.htm#xtocid2143047 hth, ipguru Dante Martins wrote: > How can I telnet to PIX inside interface from the VPN (I.E. from > 10.128.128.0 telnet 172.16.3.252). > > I have tried using telnet command: > "telnet 10.128.128.0 255.255.255.0 inside" but still no working. > > Can you help me? > > Dante > > CONF MAIN PIX > PIX Version 6.0(1) > nameif ethernet0 outside security0 > nameif ethernet1 inside security100 > nameif ethernet2 DMZ1 security10 > nameif ethernet3 intf3 security15 > nameif ethernet4 intf4 security20 > nameif ethernet5 intf5 security25 > enable password *** encrypted > passwd ** encrypted > hostname MAIN > fixup protocol ftp 21 > fixup protocol http 80 > fixup protocol h323 1720 > fixup protocol rsh 514 > fixup protocol smtp 25 > fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 > fixup protocol sip 5060 > fixup protocol skinny 2000 > names > access-list 101 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 172.16.3.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 102 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 192.168.3.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 103 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.250.1.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 103 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.249.0.0 > 255.255.240.0 > access-list 104 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.250.11.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 105 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.250.95.0 > 255.255.255.0 > pager lines 24 > logging on > interface ethernet0 auto > interface ethernet1 auto > interface ethernet2 auto > interface ethernet3 auto > interface ethernet4 auto shutdown > interface ethernet5 auto shutdown > mtu outside 1500 > mtu inside 1500 > mtu DMZ1 1500 > mtu intf3 1500 > mtu intf4 1500 > mtu intf5 1500 > ip address outside 200.219.100.2 255.255.255.0 > ip address inside 10.128.159.253 255.255.224.0 > ip address DMZ1 10.255.255.254 255.255.224.0 > ip address intf3 10.250.11.254 255.255.255.0 > ip address intf4 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 > ip address intf5 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 > ip audit info action alarm > ip audit attack action alarm > no failover > failover timeout 0:00:00 > failover poll 15 > failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address DMZ1 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address intf3 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address intf4 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address intf5 0.0.0.0 > pdm history enable > arp timeout 14400 > global (outside) 1 200.219.100.100-200.219.100.199 > global (outside) 1 200.219.100.200 > global (DMZ1) 1 10.255.224.10-10.255.224.70 > nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 > nat (DMZ1) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.26 10.255.224.3 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.31 10.255.224.9 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.54 10.255.224.4 255.255.255.255 > > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.26 10.128.128.26 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.31 10.128.128.32 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.54 10.128.128.54 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > > conduit permit icmp any any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.30 eq www any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.30 eq domain any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.30 eq domain any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.31 eq www any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.31 eq domain any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.31 eq domain any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.26 eq 161 any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.26 eq 162 any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.26 eq snmp any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.26 eq snmptrap any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.54 eq domain any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.54 eq domain any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.54 eq 22 any > > route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 200.219.100.1 1 > route outside 10.0.64.0 255.255.224.0 10.128.159.252 1 > timeout xlate 3:00:00 > timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 rpc 0:10:00 h323 > 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 > timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute > aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+ > aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius > snmp-server host inside 10.128.128.21 > snmp-server location mainsite > snmp-server contact support@mainsite > snmp-server community pixpix > snmp-server enable traps > floodguard enable > sysopt connection permit-ipsec > sysopt ipsec pl-compatible > no sysopt route dnat > > crypto ipsec transform-set strong esp-des esp-sha-hmac > crypto map cmap 1 ipsec-isakmp > crypto map cmap 1 match address 101 > crypto map cmap 1 set peer 200.200.100.2 > crypto map cmap 1 set transform-set strong > crypto map cmap 2 ipsec-isakmp > crypto map cma
Re: PIX % DNS Doctoring [7:33331]
Hi, Check your dns doctoring alias command: alias (inside) 200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30 255.255.255.255 The order above is wrong. I assume the assigned address to the dns server is 10.128.128.30 and 200.219.100.30 is only a globally translated address. The correct order should have been: alis (inside) 10.128.128.30 200.219.100.30 255.255.255.255 This command will try to initiate the dns dosctoring from the inside client and replace all dns response having 200.219.100.30 with 10.128.128.30 and not the other way round as you initially had configured it. Contact me again where necessary. Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Dante Martins To: Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:18 AM Subject: RE: PIX % DNS Doctoring [7:1] > I have a dns on inside using static (200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30) . The > dns database is resolving names to valid IP's. The problem is the > worktations from inside can't access these servers using the valid > IP's.I found some docs on Cisco site about DNS Doctoring ( > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/alias.html )but in the cisco > exemple the DNS is on outside. I need that dns send some zone forward to > other dns that is inside the VPN so...if I move that dns(200.219.100.30) > to outside interface he will not have access to the network > 10.250.0.0(VPN). I had the same problem in other situation but I was > using Checkpoint Firewall_1 and it works. > > There is some way to do it work ( using DNS on iside with static ) or I > need to move to outside?? > > > > CONF MAIN PIX > > PIX Version 6.0(1) > nameif ethernet0 outside security0 > nameif ethernet1 inside security100 > nameif ethernet2 DMZ1 security10 > nameif ethernet3 intf3 security15 > nameif ethernet4 intf4 security20 > nameif ethernet5 intf5 security25 > enable password *** encrypted > passwd ** encrypted > > hostname MAIN > > fixup protocol ftp 21 > fixup protocol http 80 > fixup protocol h323 1720 > fixup protocol rsh 514 > fixup protocol smtp 25 > fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 > fixup protocol sip 5060 > fixup protocol skinny 2000 > > names > access-list 101 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 172.16.3.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 102 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 192.168.3.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 103 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.250.1.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 103 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.249.0.0 > 255.255.240.0 > access-list 104 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.250.11.0 > 255.255.255.0 > access-list 105 permit ip 10.128.128.0 255.255.224.0 10.250.95.0 > 255.255.255.0 > > pager lines 24 > logging on > interface ethernet0 auto > interface ethernet1 auto > interface ethernet2 auto > interface ethernet3 auto > interface ethernet4 auto shutdown > interface ethernet5 auto shutdown > > mtu outside 1500 > mtu inside 1500 > mtu DMZ1 1500 > mtu intf3 1500 > mtu intf4 1500 > mtu intf5 1500 > > ip address outside 200.219.100.2 255.255.255.0 > ip address inside 10.128.159.253 255.255.224.0 > ip address DMZ1 10.255.255.254 255.255.224.0 > ip address intf3 10.250.11.254 255.255.255.0 > ip address intf4 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 > ip address intf5 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 > > ip audit info action alarm > ip audit attack action alarm > > no failover > failover timeout 0:00:00 > failover poll 15 > failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address DMZ1 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address intf3 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address intf4 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address intf5 0.0.0.0 > > pdm history enable > arp timeout 14400 > > global (outside) 1 200.219.100.100-200.219.100.199 > global (outside) 1 200.219.100.200 > global (DMZ1) 1 10.255.224.10-10.255.224.70 > nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 > nat (DMZ1) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 > > alias (inside) 200.219.100.26 10.255.224.3 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.31 10.255.224.9 255.255.255.255 > alias (inside) 200.219.100.54 10.255.224.4 255.255.255.255 > > > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.26 10.128.128.26 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.30 10.128.128.30 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.31 10.128.128.32 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) 200.219.100.54 10.128.128.54 netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > > > conduit permit icmp any any > > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.30 eq www any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.30 eq domain any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.30 eq domain any > > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.31 eq www any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.31 eq domain any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.31 eq domain any > > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.26 eq 161 any > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100.26 eq 162 any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.26 eq snmp any > conduit permit udp host 200.219.100.26 eq snmptrap any > > conduit permit tcp host 200.219.100
Re: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]
I am doing this exact thing right now for a customer and it works like a charm here is a moc config for you without ip addresses of course. See the config below and I made everything bold in reference to what everyone is speaking about with cef. One thing I have noticed it is supposed to be per packet but I am actually getting about 60/40% load balancing over the links according to theinterface counters and the packets going over each t1. That is one question that I have do you truly get 50/50 load balancing or is everyone else seeing this type of result with load balancing also. I am using ospf on both routers. mocrouter#sh conf Using 2582 out of 29688 bytes ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname mocrouter ! no logging console enable secret 5 X ! ! ! ! ! clock timezone EDT -5 clock summer-time EDT recurring ip subnet-zero ip cef no ip finger ip domain-name XXX ip name-server ip name-server ! ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 description loopback for mocrouter ip address ! interface FastEthernet0/0 description mocrouter ip address X ip broadcast-address speed 100 full-duplex ! interface Serial0/0 description Point to Point T1 to other end mocrouter ip address XX ip load-sharing per-packet no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/1 description Point to Point T1 to Other Moc Router ip address XX ip load-sharing per-packet no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33683&t=33599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: [INFOCON] - UNIRAS Briefing - 23/02 - Cisco - CatOS [7:33684]
Hi, Someone has any idea which CatOS for Cat6k is a stable release? I am currently using Release 6.1(1d), and I need to upgrade it. I am also looking at Release 7.1(1) with SSH support. Any advise from the experts out there?? Thanks Regards, Cheeyong At 08:48 AM 1/30/02 -0500, Hire, Ejay wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >- -- > >UNIRAS (UK Govt CERT) Briefing Notice - 23/02 dated 30.01.02 Time: 09:32 > UNIRAS is part of NISCC(National Infrastructure Security Co-ordination >Centre) >- -- > > UNIRAS material is also available from its website at www.uniras.gov.uk >and > Information about NISCC is available from www.niscc.gov.uk >- -- > > >Title >= >Cisco CatOS Telnet Buffer Vulnerability > >Detail >== > >- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco CatOS Telnet Buffer Vulnerability > > >Revision 1.0 > >For Public Release 2002 January 29 at 1500 UTC > >- - >--- > >Summary >- - --- >Some Cisco Catalyst switches, running certain CatOS based software releases, >have a vulnerability wherein a buffer overflow in the telnet option handling >can cause the telnet daemon to crash and result in a switch reload. This >vulnerability can be exploited to initiate a denial of service (DoS) attack. > >This vulnerability is documented as Cisco bug ID CSCdw19195. There are >workarounds available to mitigate the vulnerability. > >This advisory will be posted at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ >catos-telrcv-vuln-pub.shtml . > >Affected Products >- - - >Cisco's various Catalyst family of switches run CatOS-based releases or >IOS-based releases. IOS-based releases are not vulnerable. > >The following Cisco Catalyst Switches are vulnerable : > > * Catalyst 6000 series > * Catalyst 5000 series > * Catalyst 4000 series > * Catalyst 2948G > * Catalyst 2900 > >For the switches above, the following CatOS based switch software revisions >are >vulnerable. > >+--- >--+ >| | Release 4 | Release 5 | Release 6 | Release 7 >| >| | code base | code base | code base | code base >| >|---+---+---+--+ >--| >| Catalyst 6000 | Not | earlier than | earlier than | earlier >than | >| series| Applicable |5.5(13)|6.3(4)|7.1(2) >| >|---+---+---+--+ >--| >| Catalyst 5000 | earlier than | earlier than | earlier than | Not >| >| series| 4.5(13a)|5.5(13)|6.3(4)| Applicable >| >|---+---+---+--+ >--| >| Catalyst 4000 | All releases | earlier than | earlier than | earlier >than | >| series| |5.5(13)|6.3(4)|7.1(2) >| >+--- >--+ > >To determine your software revision, type show version at the command line >prompt. > >Not Affected Products >- - - >The following Cisco Catalyst Switches are not vulnerable : > > * Catalyst 8500 series > * Catalyst 4800 series > * Catalyst 4200 series > * Catalyst 3900 series > * Catalyst 3550 series > * Catalyst 3500 XL series > * Catalyst 4840G > * Catalyst 4908G-l3 > * Catalyst 2948G-l3 > * Catalyst 2950 > * Catalyst 2900 XL > * Catalyst 2900 LRE XL > * Catalyst 2820 > * Catalyst 1900 > >No other Cisco product is currently known to be affected by this >vulnerability. > >Details >- - --- >Some Cisco Catalyst switches, running certain CatOS-based software releases, >have a vulnerability wherein a buffer overflow in the telnet option handling >can cause the telnet daemon to crash and result in a switch reload. This >vulnerability can be exploited to initiate a denial of service (DoS) attack. >Once the switch has reloaded, it is still vulnerable and the attack can be >repeated as long as the switch is IP reachable on port 23 and has not been >upgraded to a fixed version of CatOS switch software. > >This vulnerability is documented as Cisco bug ID CSCdw19195, which requires >a >CCO account to view and can be viewed after 2002 January 30 at 1500 UTC. > >Impact >- - -- >This vulnerability can be exploited to produce a denial of service (DoS) >attack. When the vulnerability is exploited it can cause the Cisco Catalyst >switch to crash and reload. > >Software Versions and Fixes >- - --- >This vul
Re: Internet Router? [7:33639]
But if all you're talking about is a branch router with 2 WAN links, do you really need to carry full BGP routes? Is it really that important to get optimum routing in this situation? In fact, I even doubt that you need 64MB of RAM for your BGP. Just have both ISP's hand you a default. Or perhaps a single BGP route from, say, UUnet, and then recursively point your default to that route ""Circusnuts_1999"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I was under the impression full Internet route tables required 128 Megs > of RAM, with 256 as the target build. The 7206s have up to 512 RAM > available in the NPE, as does the Juniper M5 (just to give a few good > examples of Internet routers). I have not fitted an Internet router in > @ least 6 months, but the last time I looked we were up to 120,000 > prefixes on the net. The 3640 can definitely handle the T-1 traffic > you're describing, but with BGP as the solution, I think you may want > something like a 3660 or 7204. I believe the max upgrade for the 3640 > it 128 and the 3660 is 256 (don't quote me :o) Also- the 3660 enters in > a little more redundancy, unless you had planned to 3640s. > > .02 > Phil > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Scott Nawalaniec > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Internet Router? [7:33639] > > Hello Everybody, > > I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. > > Scenario: > I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet > connectivity > running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's > to > the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I > just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. > > My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI > port. > > Thank you for the input. > > Scott > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33685&t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pbx Fundamentals--2 [7:33686]
Could U Please reply to the following questions: 1) ___ signaling is the most common signaling scheme used in the public switched network. a. Loop start b. Ground start c. E & M d. QSIG 2)Which of the following is not a benefit of a digital Feature Telephone used with a PBX? a. Speakerphone support for hands-free operation b. One button feature activation simplifies user training and promotes feature usage c. Support for Multiple PBX vendors d. Multiple line appearances only require one line card circuit termination e. Display capability improves information to the set user 3)To the PBX system, a Voice Mail system typically appears as: a. A control link and a CTI link b. A control link and multiple lines c. A control link and an RS-232 link d. A trunk 4)What is the function of the transmission component of the PSTN? a. Provide a path between end points within the network b. Make decisions on where to route traffic between end points within the network c. Identify the destination and set up and tear down the path between end points d. A and B 5)Q.Sig as opposed to DPNSS does not require a D-channel. a. True b. False 6)Which of the following is not a key component of a PBX? a. The control complex b. The user interface c. The terminal interface d. The switching network 7)___ is/are an example(s) of Call Center data that can be collected from a PBX. a. Trunk a call entered on b. Length of time a call waited c. How long a caller talked to each agent d. All of the above Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33686&t=33686 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
Hi Everyone I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on a port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing some performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there were the usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find any explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated Regards Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33687&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
And here's the show port I forgot!! (enable) sh port 2/26 Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- - 2/26 Temp Driver server connected 990 full 100 10/100BaseTX Port AuxiliaryVlan AuxVlan-Status InlinePowered PowerAllocated Admin Oper Detected mWatt mA @42V - - -- - -- - 2/26 none none - - -- - Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex - - - --- 2/26 disabled shutdown 001 disabled 51 Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr Shutdown/Time-Left - - - -- 2/26 -- -- - Port Broadcast-Limit Broadcast-Drop --- 2/26 -0 Port Send FlowControlReceive FlowControl RxPause TxPause Unsupported adminoper adminoper opcodes - --- --- --- 2/26 off offoff off 0 0 0 Port Status Channel Admin Ch Mode Group Id - -- - - 2/26 connected auto silent 68 0 Port Align-Err FCS-ErrXmit-Err Rcv-ErrUnderSize - -- -- -- -- - 2/26 154661 138931 0 0 6246 Port Single-Col Multi-Coll Late-Coll Excess-Col Carri-Sen Runts Giants - -- -- -- -- - - -- --- 2/26 0 0 0 0 0 30531 1 Port Last-Time-Cleared - -- ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Everyone > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on a > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > some > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there were > the > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find any > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > Regards > > Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33689&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
Does anyone know what telnet client you get to use in the lab? That could make a BIG difference in how well you are able to work? __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor too much. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except in RTP they said not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already calibrated it before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > tone/ring on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that most of the equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken the new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers did you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? What models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it still the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > work on it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > _ > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com >_ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33690&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like port speed/duplex mismatch. ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Everyone > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on a > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > some > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there were > the > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find any > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > Regards > > Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33691&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
Positive, if you look at the show port (on the other mail) you'll see there are no collisions Thanks ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like port > speed/duplex mismatch. > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Everyone > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on a > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > > some > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there were > > the > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find > any > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > Regards > > > > Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33692&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN Solution -help needed [7:33668]
If you are using nat friendly applications, then you could get an Ip from the pool on the dialer interface and nat inside/outside. What are you trying to do? -Ejay -Original Message- From: Shane Stockman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN Solution -help needed [7:33668] I have a 1601 with BRI Wic and 3COM hub with 4 users.There is only 1 ISDN BRI.I need all four users to access the main office but use the ip pool on the main 3640. Any ideas Thanks _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33693&t=33668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pbx Fundamentals--2 [7:33686]
Gee, these look exactly like questions that I had on my Telephony Fundamentals test; thus, answering the questions here would be a violation of Cisco's NDA. Sorry. But, if you do some searching on Cisco's pages, and the Internet in general, you can find the answers, and the rational behind them. - Original Message - From: "salimss" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:00 AM Subject: Pbx Fundamentals--2 [7:33686] > Could U Please reply to the following questions: > > 1) ___ signaling is the most common signaling scheme used in > the public switched network. > > > a. Loop start > b. Ground start > c. E & M > d. QSIG > > 2)Which of the following is not a benefit of a digital Feature Telephone > used with a PBX? > > > a. Speakerphone support for hands-free operation > b. One button feature activation simplifies user training and > promotes feature usage > c. Support for Multiple PBX vendors > d. Multiple line appearances only require one line card circuit > termination > e. Display capability improves information to the set user > > > 3)To the PBX system, a Voice Mail system typically appears as: > > > a. A control link and a CTI link > b. A control link and multiple lines > c. A control link and an RS-232 link > d. A trunk > > 4)What is the function of the transmission component of the PSTN? > > > a. Provide a path between end points within the network > b. Make decisions on where to route traffic between end points > within the network > c. Identify the destination and set up and tear down the path > between end points > d. A and B > > > 5)Q.Sig as opposed to DPNSS does not require a D-channel. > > a. True > b. False > > 6)Which of the following is not a key component of a PBX? > > > a. The control complex > b. The user interface > c. The terminal interface > d. The switching network > > 7)___ is/are an example(s) of Call Center data that > can be collected from a PBX. > > > a. Trunk a call entered on > b. Length of time a call waited > c. How long a caller talked to each agent > d. All of the above _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33694&t=33686 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
Then try switching ports, shutting it down, different PC, etc,. It's probably the PC then ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Positive, if you look at the show port (on the other mail) you'll see there > are no collisions > > Thanks > > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like > port > > speed/duplex mismatch. > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi Everyone > > > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on > a > > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > > > some > > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there > were > > > the > > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find > > any > > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33695&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
Reflections -Original Message- From: Thomas Crowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2002 14:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] Does anyone know what telnet client you get to use in the lab? That could make a BIG difference in how well you are able to work? __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor too much. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except in RTP they said not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already calibrated it before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > tone/ring on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that most of the equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken the new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers did you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? What models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it still the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > work on it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > _ > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com >_ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33697&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Router? [7:33639]
If all you need is two t-1's with no eye towards future scalability, then just about any router will work (17xx+) the trick is you don't need to accept full routes via BGP, Just accept the default routes. -Original Message- From: Scott Nawalaniec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Internet Router? [7:33639] Hello Everybody, I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. Scenario: I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. Thank you for the input. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33698&t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP problem [7:33636]
You don't have an EIGRP problem, the routing protocol has nothing to do with an interface being up or down. 12.0.8 is prey old, before beating your head I would upgrade the IOS. Dave Vajira Wijesinghe wrote: > > I have a 2610 router having IP IOS software (12.0.8). > This is connected to two different sites with 64kbps links. > eg > interface serial 0/0 > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 > > interface serial 0/1 > ip address 192.168.1.5 255.255.255.252 > > router is running with routing protocol EIGRP > > router eigrp 100 > network 192.168.1.0 > > Problem: > > I'm able to work with only ONE serial link at a time. > ie. > If one serial link is active, other one becomes "line protocol down" > If I remove the cable of the UP interface, the OTHER interface become UP > > I suspect this is due to the operation of EIGRP > Because I cannot configure subnet mask for the network defined under > eigrp 100 > This particular IOS doesn't allow me to do this and DRAM and FLASH > limitation prevents me from upgrading the IOS. > > Can any one tell me how to overcome the situation? > > Thanks, > Vajira > > 12.0.8 ip > - (on postoffice) > > The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be > read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit > http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire > confidentiality clause. > > - -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33699&t=33636 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
Just checking, did you try some of the basic ts steps? - Connect a different cable between them. - Try a different NIC - Try a different port - etc... Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Patrick Donlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687] Positive, if you look at the show port (on the other mail) you'll see there are no collisions Thanks ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like port > speed/duplex mismatch. > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Everyone > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on a > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > > some > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there were > > the > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find > any > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > Regards > > > > Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33700&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
It's a RS6000 not a PC, I think it's running AIX ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Then try switching ports, shutting it down, different PC, etc,. It's > probably the PC then > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Positive, if you look at the show port (on the other mail) you'll see > there > > are no collisions > > > > Thanks > > > > > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like > > port > > > speed/duplex mismatch. > > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Hi Everyone > > > > > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see > on > > a > > > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was > experiencing > > > > some > > > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there > > were > > > > the > > > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't > find > > > any > > > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33701&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
You appear to have the inline power module for ip phones. I had a problem once on a server where I disabled the power on the port and this resolved the errors. C6509> (enable) set port inlinepower 2/26 off Dave Patrick Donlon wrote: > > And here's the show port I forgot!! > > (enable) sh port 2/26 > Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type > - -- -- -- -- - > 2/26 Temp Driver server connected 990 full 100 10/100BaseTX > > Port AuxiliaryVlan AuxVlan-Status InlinePowered PowerAllocated >Admin Oper Detected mWatt mA @42V > - - -- - -- - > 2/26 none none - - -- - > > Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex > - - - --- > 2/26 disabled shutdown 001 disabled 51 > > Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr > Shutdown/Time-Left > - - - > -- > 2/26 > -- -- - > > Port Broadcast-Limit Broadcast-Drop > --- > 2/26 -0 > > Port Send FlowControlReceive FlowControl RxPause TxPause Unsupported >adminoper adminoper opcodes > - --- --- --- > 2/26 off offoff off 0 0 0 > > Port Status Channel Admin Ch > Mode Group Id > - -- - - > 2/26 connected auto silent 68 0 > > Port Align-Err FCS-ErrXmit-Err Rcv-ErrUnderSize > - -- -- -- -- - > 2/26 154661 138931 0 0 6246 > > Port Single-Col Multi-Coll Late-Coll Excess-Col Carri-Sen Runts Giants > - -- -- -- -- - - -- > --- > 2/26 0 0 0 0 0 30531 > 1 > > Port Last-Time-Cleared > - -- > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Everyone > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on a > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > > some > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there were > > the > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find > any > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > Regards > > > > Patrick -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33702&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Router doesn't hold Enable Passwrod [7:33645]
This may just be me operating witout caffiene, but are you saving the config to Startup after the changes? copy run star works wonders. if I just insulted your intelligence, slap me around later. -QTone Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33703&t=33645 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
I *KNOW* I didn't just see a brit scoff at some other country's food. Not from the country that brought us meat pies and pudding that isn't. j/k :-) --Qtone Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33704&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Cisco AVVID vs. 3Com [7:33705]
Does anyone have any working experience or good opinions on Cisco's IP Telephony solution compared to 3Com? I'm trying to make a buying decision and right now am very up in the air. 3Com has a nice and more cost effective solution that even would allow me to (coming soon) be able to use my existing legacy Lucent/Nortel phones with their NBX system. But 3Com doesn't have IP to the phone yet and they seem to have some proprietary voice over ethernet... Their inline power is also consisting of power patch panels or the power coupler.. not pretty. Any comments? Thanks Cory Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33705&t=33705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
Dave tried that one first as I thought it was the most interesting, but sadly (enable) set port inline 2/26 off Feature not supported on module 2. I'll go back to basics first Ole. Thanks for the replies Pat ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > You appear to have the inline power module for ip phones. I had a > problem once on a server where I disabled the power on the port and this > resolved the errors. > > C6509> (enable) set port inlinepower 2/26 off > > Dave > > Patrick Donlon wrote: > > > > And here's the show port I forgot!! > > > > (enable) sh port 2/26 > > Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type > > - -- -- -- -- - > > 2/26 Temp Driver server connected 990 full 100 10/100BaseTX > > > > Port AuxiliaryVlan AuxVlan-Status InlinePowered PowerAllocated > >Admin Oper Detected mWatt mA @42V > > - - -- - -- - > > 2/26 none none - - -- - > > > > Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex > > - - - --- > > 2/26 disabled shutdown 001 disabled 51 > > > > Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr > > Shutdown/Time-Left > > - - - > > > -- > > 2/26 > > -- -- - > > > > Port Broadcast-Limit Broadcast-Drop > > --- > > 2/26 -0 > > > > Port Send FlowControlReceive FlowControl RxPause TxPause > Unsupported > >adminoper adminoper opcodes > > - --- --- > --- > > 2/26 off offoff off 0 0 0 > > > > Port Status Channel Admin Ch > > Mode Group Id > > - -- - - > > 2/26 connected auto silent 68 0 > > > > Port Align-Err FCS-ErrXmit-Err Rcv-ErrUnderSize > > - -- -- -- -- - > > 2/26 154661 138931 0 0 6246 > > > > Port Single-Col Multi-Coll Late-Coll Excess-Col Carri-Sen Runts > Giants > > - -- -- -- -- - - > -- > > --- > > 2/26 0 0 0 0 0 30531 > > 1 > > > > Port Last-Time-Cleared > > - -- > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi Everyone > > > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on > a > > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > > > some > > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there were > > > the > > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find > > any > > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Patrick > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33707&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE:OT: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
I can go one better than that. I am from a part of Britain (Scotland) that is well known for its Deep fried Mars bars done in batter. Superb!! -Original Message- From: timothy thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2002 15:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I *KNOW* I didn't just see a brit scoff at some other country's food. Not from the country that brought us meat pies and pudding that isn't. j/k :-) --Qtone Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33708&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco AVVID vs. 3Com [7:33705]
What are you trying to achive? There are many pros of the AVVID architecture which of course do have their price, it really comes down to what you do need. Antonio ""Stull, Cory"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone have any working experience or good opinions on Cisco's IP > Telephony solution compared to 3Com? I'm trying to make a buying decision > and right now am very up in the air. 3Com has a nice and more cost > effective solution that even would allow me to (coming soon) be able to use > my existing legacy Lucent/Nortel phones with their NBX system. But 3Com > doesn't have IP to the phone yet and they seem to have some proprietary > voice over ethernet... Their inline power is also consisting of power patch > panels or the power coupler.. not pretty. > > Any comments? > > Thanks > Cory Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33710&t=33705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Startup questions [7:33711]
Hi, group. I have a few questions to iron out regarding OSPF startup. 1. EXSTART - master/slave is created between each router and its adjacent DR/BDR. Q: But this "election" on who the master will be is mute because the router with the higher RID (thus) the DR/BDR acts as the master, right? If not, shouldn't the DR act as the master anyway since he ( or she) is the central distribution point for the area's topology? 2. LOADING - slave router sends an LS request if the master's DBD has a more up-to-date link-state entry. Q: "up-to-date" meaning timestamps?? But...what if there's no NTP server to synchronize them? Thanks. Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33711&t=33711 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: term no mon command [7:33658]
It may not be a good idea to turn everything off with "no logg cons". You may want to limit the message rate or severity levels. Try: "logg rate cons 10 all except crit" or "logg cons 3" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stuart Laubstein Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: term no mon command [7:33658] I have a 3620 and I have to work on the console port but I am swamped with messages every few seconds as people try to log in via the pri. I used the term no mon command but it doesnt work--I still get connect messages etc. Does anyone have an idea where these message come from and how I can shut them off. We are using 12.0(7) XK1 Early Deployment release. thanks stuart Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33713&t=33658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714]
team, For Cisco QoS configuration below, which one we should configure on both routers which one is not..? 1. RED/WRED 2. FRTS/GTS 3. rSVP 4. CAR 5. CQ, PQ 6. RTP..? thanks Grad _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33714&t=33714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
INS used to do that as well, hell we used to have free soda, food and BEER! Ah...the glory days -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I love Cisco's free soda's and waters. It's got to be one of the best perks! ""McCallum, Robert"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Come on mate where's your sense of humour. > > BTW Jason is right the mouse new it was in for a hard time when it saw me so > it bolted. > > As for Brussels you do not see any equipment, you are just sat in a > classroom with keyboard, monitor, mouse (sometimes), pens, pencils, > sharpener , rubber (eraser for the Americans) and paper. You can wander off > at any time to get yourself a "free" can of coke or tea / coffee. I would > advise this > as you may as well bloat yourself with liquid as the lunch is a buffet > selection of continental type rolls. For us Brits sweet rolls with some > form of strange meat on them doesn't really appeal, in fact they were quite > rancid. I couldn't find a decent roll despite my 6 times of trying. Next > time > I'm going to bring in a packed lunch, with a Capri Sun just for luck. > > Cat5000,Cat3924,2600's,3600. > > -Original Message- > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 January 2002 04:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to > 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have > wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. > > >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan > 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor > too much. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, > January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent > One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except > in RTP they said not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already > calibrated it before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in > message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. > In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle > you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > tone/ring > on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 > PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab > Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a > monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that most of the > equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: > Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? > [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken the > new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers did > you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? What > models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it still > the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > work on > it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > http://www.hotmail.com > >_ >Do You > Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33715&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: css 11000 [7:33498]
During a session, the CSS maintains an association between a client an a server. The association is referred to as stickiness. Stickiness enables transactions over the web when the client must remain on the same server for the entire session. Depending on the content rule, the CSS sticks a client to an appropriate server after the css has determined which load balancing method to use. Depending on the application, the site may require that the customer become stuck to one server once the connection is established, or the application may not require this until the customer starts to build a shopping cart. The CSS can use a variety of methods to achieve stickiness depending on the requirement of the application including: Source IP address Source IP address and destination port. String found in a cookie or URL SSL session ID In my case I needed the client stuck as soon as they log on to the site.. >From: "Gaz" >Reply-To: "Gaz" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: css 11000 [7:33498] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:56:34 -0500 > >I'm not doubting that there is one, but what's the importance of using >sticky for http? > >Fill a gap in my knowledge. I've only ever seen the requirement for sticky >for SSL. >I've not seen a great deal of load balancing with the CSS 11000's, we use >mainly Foundry. What's the role of the "arrowpoint-cookie". Are the servers >actually configured to issue cookies? > >If its http, don't all proxy's mess up your requirement for sticky? > >Sorry, I'm asking more questions than you did, but trying to understand >your >problem as I have an interest in this area. > >Cheers, > > >Gaz > > > >""John Neiberger"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Yes, you can load balance on the SSL Session ID. > > > > John > > > > >>> "Arinze Okafo" 1/29/02 11:07:39 AM >>> > > I don't have ssl enabled in the servers. Currently I am load balancing > > on > > port 80. I am not sure using SSL 443 would work since I do not have it > > on > > the servers. > > > > Secondly I am using ICMP for keepalive in the services. > > > > Still serching for an answer... > > > > Thanks > > >From: "Gaz" > > >Reply-To: "Gaz" > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: css 11000 [7:33498] > > >Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:38:28 -0500 > > > > > >What port are you load balancing? If it's SSL, can you load balance > > based > > >on > > >SSL session ID? > > > > > >Gaz > > > > > > > > >""Arinze Okafo"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Does anyone have a solution to this problem? > > > > > > > > I have configured a CSS 11000 switch for server load balancing, > > using > > >the > > > > advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie but some users are having > > problems > > >with > > > > stickiness. These users access the site via a mega-proxy. > > > > > > > > I have also tried to use a sticky-mask 255.255.240.0, without much > > >success . > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > Thanks Anybody for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: > > http://messenger.msn.com > > _ > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33716&t=33498 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPLS VPN [7:33717]
Anybody having experience in MPLS VPN...Please write back, I need some help. Thanks, Stanzin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33717&t=33717 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPLS VPN.. [7:33718]
Anybody having experience in MPLS VPN...Please write back, I need some help. Thanks, Stanzin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33718&t=33718 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snmp, 64bit interface counters, slightly OT but related [7:33719]
I'm experimenting with snmp. Ios 12.2(5) . Snmp configuration is simply snmp-server community community RO 4 snmp-server location somewhere snmp-server contact somebody@somewhere snmp-server chassis-id someid I'm trying to monitor some 64bit counters (ifHCInOctets ecc.) with mrtg, but can't get the correct values, in fact mrtg complains WARNING: Expected a number but got '#' with a basic configuration like Target[name.tst]: 1:community@host:2 Normal snmp v1 setup works for all the usual targets I tested (interfaces, cpu, memory, ntp for now). debug snmp headers, debug snmp packets logs 012086: Jan 30 18:11:16.117 CET: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 10.64.1.90 on FastEthernet0/0 012087: Jan 30 18:11:16.121 CET: SNMP: Get request, reqid 1180365729, errstat 0, erridx 0 ifXEntry.6.1 = NULL TYPE/VALUE ifXEntry.10.1 = NULL TYPE/VALUE sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE system.5.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE 012088: Jan 30 18:11:16.149 CET: Incoming SNMP packet 012089: Jan 30 18:11:16.149 CET: v1 packet 012090: Jan 30 18:11:16.149 CET: community string: community 012091: Jan 30 18:11:16.153 CET: SNMP: Response, reqid 1180365729, errstat 0, erridx 0 ifXEntry.6.1 = NO_SUCH_INSTANCE_EXCEPTION ifXEntry.10.1 = NO_SUCH_INSTANCE_EXCEPTION sysUpTime.0 = 415320882 system.5.0 = CiscoR2.previnet.it 012092: Jan 30 18:11:16.193 CET: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 10.64.1.90 Trying to snmwalk those counters appareantly won't work either - snmpwalk -v 2c host community ifXTable does produce everything except the 64bit counters. debug produces lots of Incoming SNMP packet 012026: Jan 30 18:02:02.874 CET: v1 packet 012027: Jan 30 18:02:02.874 CET: community string: community 012028: Jan 30 18:02:02.874 CET: SNMP: Response, reqid 709824394, errstat 0, erridx 0 ifXEntry.19.34 = 0 012029: Jan 30 18:02:02.890 CET: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 10.64.1.90 012030: Jan 30 18:02:02.894 CET: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 10.64.1.90 on FastEthernet0/0 012031: Jan 30 18:02:02.898 CET: SNMP: Get-next request, reqid 709824395, errstat 0, erridx 0 ifXEntry.19.34 = NULL TYPE/VALUE 012032: Jan 30 18:02:02.906 CET: and so on - note the "v1 packet" in both debug output. But note, snmpget -v 2c host community .iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.ifMIB.ifMIBObjects.ifXTable.ifXEntry.1. 1 ifMIB.ifMIBObjects.ifXTable.ifXEntry.ifName.1 = Fa0/0 while snmpget -v 2c host community .iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.ifMIB.ifMIBObjects.ifXTable.ifXEntry.6. 1 ifMIB.ifMIBObjects.ifXTable.ifXEntry.ifHCInOctets.1 = No Such Instance currently exists This would have been ifHCInOctets for Fa0/0 . debug printed ifXEntry.6.1 = NO_SUCH_INSTANCE_EXCEPTION so appareantly snmpget did not lie on me. I see two possibilities: a) my router config needs something else to enable v2 - but in that case debug should at least complain for a v2c packets. b) that basic mrtg conf needs something else or the version of mrtg I'm using (2.9.17) is buggy, AND I'm using snmpwalk with a wrong syntax, too (or it is buggy). c) ? Any idea at least if the problem is related to the router config or the mrtg/snmpwalk setup ? Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33719&t=33719 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco AVVID vs. 3Com [7:33705]
My company is a Cisco Voice partner and a 3Com Voice Partner. The office I work out of uses the 3Com NBX for about 20 phones. It works, no real complaints. Some of the earlier versions of code were pretty bad. Downsides, NBX has 1 hard drive, if it goes we are down. No way to backup. 3Com may be providing a new solution, I'm not sure??? Here is our position when selling to a customers. If they are a small office (0-30 phones), with no need for VoIP connecting different offices, 3Com is probably the best choice. Cost is a lot less than Cisco solution for same customer and customer wants basic features (voice-mail, auto-attendant, call-park, call-transfer, speaker phone). For customers with larger offices (40+ phones), the potential for VoIP with branch offices we go Cisco. We end up selling Cisco to 95% of our customers. In-line powered phones is a big advantage. Power outlets at the desk are usually filled, it's nice to avoid power strips at every desk. I see 3Com has a price advantage and Cisco has a Technology advantage. Support from Cisco is excellent. Lots of time the problem people have with the Cisco solution is the complexity. Cisco VoIP can work in many different environments, 3Com is more positioned for the standard/simple small office. Don't forget data integration with IP phone system. XML applications to the phone are a very good thing. Some applications on the phones our customers like are phone directories, time-clock sign-in/sign-out (for hourly staff). You have to look at the survivability of the company. 3Com has problems turning a profit. Networkers hate 3Com NICs, 3Com has exited the core switching market. They now sell NICs (most professionals hate them), modems (commodity), low end switches (commodity), home broadband routers (Cable/DSL commodity), and a low end phone system. How long will this model work Will they dump the NBX in the next 12 months??? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stull, Cory Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Cisco AVVID vs. 3Com [7:33705] Does anyone have any working experience or good opinions on Cisco's IP Telephony solution compared to 3Com? I'm trying to make a buying decision and right now am very up in the air. 3Com has a nice and more cost effective solution that even would allow me to (coming soon) be able to use my existing legacy Lucent/Nortel phones with their NBX system. But 3Com doesn't have IP to the phone yet and they seem to have some proprietary voice over ethernet... Their inline power is also consisting of power patch panels or the power coupler.. not pretty. Any comments? Thanks Cory Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33720&t=33705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Router? [7:33639]
The 3640 will work for you. I would definitely max out the RAM. Some others have commented about not needing full BGP route tables. My customers have been very happy with partial tables as described in the following CCO link. I have also had customers use 2 2650's, 1 T-1 per connection box, HSRP on the Ethernet port and run IBGP between each other for optimal routing. I then configured them with the below link. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/41.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Nawalaniec Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Internet Router? [7:33639] Hello Everybody, I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. Scenario: I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. Thank you for the input. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33721&t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for V.35 Cables [7:33619]
I just got a catalogue from www.l-m.com that has Cisco cables for a good price. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kwame Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Looking for V.35 Cables [7:33619] Looking for a couple of V.35 Cables for back to back router connection from a 7513 to 2511. Anyone? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33722&t=33619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Internet Router? [7:33639]
Scott, we just replaced our 7204 w/128 MB with a 7505 256 to handle dual DS3s. At last glimpse there were 103,000 routes. This upgrade was for future impacts. The 7204 has been reallocated to handle another DS3 all by itself. Hope this helps...just my .02 Scott Nawalaniec wrote: >Hello Everybody, > >I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. > >Scenario: >I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity >running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to >the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I >just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. > >My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. > >Thank you for the input. > >Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33723&t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Startup questions [7:33711]
Thanks, I should pay closer attention to Doyle next time. But still, i would think that regardless if there's a new router with a higher RID that comes on line, the DR/BDR should be the default MASTER to initiate the exchange since he's got all the topology/links info in the area, except of course for scenarios where there is no DR/BDR. Elmer - Original Message - From: "Rogell, Dennis" To: "'Cebuano'" Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:19 PM Subject: RE: OSPF Startup questions [7:33711] > You can make the Dr the higher rid , and the answer to 3 is it looks at > sequence numbers not timestamps.If the information it receives is the same > but the sequence number is greater that will be entered into ls database. > > hth > > Dennis Rogell CNE, CCNP > nextiraone > Formally Milgo Solutions > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: (954) 846-5128 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cebuano [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 08:38 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: OSPF Startup questions [7:33711] > > > > Hi, group. > > I have a few questions to iron out regarding OSPF startup. > > > > 1. EXSTART - master/slave is created between each router and its adjacent > > DR/BDR. > > Q: But this "election" on who the master will be is mute because the > > router with the higher RID (thus) the DR/BDR acts as the master, right? If > > not, shouldn't the DR act as the master anyway since he ( or she) is the > > central distribution point for the area's topology? > > > > 2. LOADING - slave router sends an LS request if the master's DBD has a > > more > > up-to-date link-state entry. > > Q: "up-to-date" meaning timestamps?? But...what if there's no NTP > > server > > to synchronize them? > > > > Thanks. > > Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33724&t=33711 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Errors on Ethernet Ports on 6500?!?!?! [7:32853]
I have been seeing a lot of problems with 3COM NIC's If the switch is forced 100/full and the NIC is auto we get a lot of errors, if NIC is forced 100/Full errors go away. If Switch and 3Com NIC left to auto switch will come up 100/full and NIC 100/half. You have to make sure the NIC is also forced. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Williams Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Errors on Ethernet Ports on 6500?!?!?! [7:32853] This is wild stuff, so I thought I'd run it by GroupStudy to see if anyone had seen this before or knew what caused it. We're currently migrating connections from a 5513+RSM to a new 6509+Sup2/MSFC2. There were three ethernet connections, that upon being moved from the 5500 to the 6500, starting showing input errors and CRC errors. When these connections were moved, the port on the 6500 was configured identically to the same port on the 5500 as far as speed, duplex, VLAN assignment, and spanning tree settings. These same devices (same patch cables and all) created no errors on the 5500 whatsoever. Here's the kicker: When we went back and changed the port speed/duplex to "auto" on the 6500, it negociated the same speed/duplex settings we had forced, but now there were no more errors. (i.e. a server set for 100-Full, that was plugged into a switchport on the 5500 forced to 100-Full was fine, but plugged into a port on the 6500 forced to 100-Full caused errors, and plugged into the exact same 6500 port set for "auto" speed/duplex had no errors.) Any ideas on why letting the switch detect settings caused no errors while forcing it to those same settings causes errors? Thanks, Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33725&t=32853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPX host static name possible? [7:33726]
Hi all! Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host name to an IPX address. Like we do for IP addresses This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. Thanks for any reply, Paulo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33726&t=33726 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FW: [INFOCON] - UNIRAS Briefing - 23/02 - Cisco - CatOS [7:33727]
I have been happy with 6.3(4). I would want to hold off on the 7.1(1). No experience with it, but it seems on the Cats early revisions can sometimes be flaky. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tay Chee Yong Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: [INFOCON] - UNIRAS Briefing - 23/02 - Cisco - CatOS [7:33684] Hi, Someone has any idea which CatOS for Cat6k is a stable release? I am currently using Release 6.1(1d), and I need to upgrade it. I am also looking at Release 7.1(1) with SSH support. Any advise from the experts out there?? Thanks Regards, Cheeyong At 08:48 AM 1/30/02 -0500, Hire, Ejay wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >- - - > >UNIRAS (UK Govt CERT) Briefing Notice - 23/02 dated 30.01.02 Time: 09:32 > UNIRAS is part of NISCC(National Infrastructure Security Co-ordination >Centre) >- - - > > UNIRAS material is also available from its website at www.uniras.gov.uk >and > Information about NISCC is available from www.niscc.gov.uk >- - - > > >Title >= >Cisco CatOS Telnet Buffer Vulnerability > >Detail >== > >- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco CatOS Telnet Buffer Vulnerability > > >Revision 1.0 > >For Public Release 2002 January 29 at 1500 UTC > >- - --- - >--- > >Summary >- - --- >Some Cisco Catalyst switches, running certain CatOS based software releases, >have a vulnerability wherein a buffer overflow in the telnet option handling >can cause the telnet daemon to crash and result in a switch reload. This >vulnerability can be exploited to initiate a denial of service (DoS) attack. > >This vulnerability is documented as Cisco bug ID CSCdw19195. There are >workarounds available to mitigate the vulnerability. > >This advisory will be posted at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ >catos-telrcv-vuln-pub.shtml . > >Affected Products >- - - >Cisco's various Catalyst family of switches run CatOS-based releases or >IOS-based releases. IOS-based releases are not vulnerable. > >The following Cisco Catalyst Switches are vulnerable : > > * Catalyst 6000 series > * Catalyst 5000 series > * Catalyst 4000 series > * Catalyst 2948G > * Catalyst 2900 > >For the switches above, the following CatOS based switch software revisions >are >vulnerable. > >+-- - >--+ >| | Release 4 | Release 5 | Release 6 | Release 7 >| >| | code base | code base | code base | code base >| >|---+---+---+--+--- - >--| >| Catalyst 6000 | Not | earlier than | earlier than | earlier >than | >| series| Applicable |5.5(13)|6.3(4)|7.1(2) >| >|---+---+---+--+--- - >--| >| Catalyst 5000 | earlier than | earlier than | earlier than | Not >| >| series| 4.5(13a)|5.5(13)|6.3(4)| Applicable >| >|---+---+---+--+--- - >--| >| Catalyst 4000 | All releases | earlier than | earlier than | earlier >than | >| series| |5.5(13)|6.3(4)|7.1(2) >| >+-- - >--+ > >To determine your software revision, type show version at the command line >prompt. > >Not Affected Products >- - - >The following Cisco Catalyst Switches are not vulnerable : > > * Catalyst 8500 series > * Catalyst 4800 series > * Catalyst 4200 series > * Catalyst 3900 series > * Catalyst 3550 series > * Catalyst 3500 XL series > * Catalyst 4840G > * Catalyst 4908G-l3 > * Catalyst 2948G-l3 > * Catalyst 2950 > * Catalyst 2900 XL > * Catalyst 2900 LRE XL > * Catalyst 2820 > * Catalyst 1900 > >No other Cisco product is currently known to be affected by this >vulnerability. > >Details >- - --- >Some Cisco Catalyst switches, running certain CatOS-based software releases, >have a vulnerability wherein a buffer overflow in the telnet option handling >can cause the telnet daemon to crash and result in a switch reload. This >vulnerability can be exploited to initiate a denial of service (DoS) attack. >Once the switch has reloaded, it is still vulnerable and the attack can be >repeated as long as the switch is IP reachable on port 23 and has not been >upgraded to a fixed version of CatOS switch software. > >This vulnera
IPX host static name possible? [7:33728]
Hi all! Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host name to an IPX address. Like we do for IP addresses This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. Thanks for any reply, Paulo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33728&t=33728 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS VPN.. [7:33718]
Hello Stanzin, what do you want to know ? Do you want to set up an MPLS VPN over POS or over ATM ? Please provide specfics on what you are trying to build. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33730&t=33718 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Errors on Ethernet Ports on 6500?!?!?! [7:32853]
That is a common problem with 3Com NICs you can try upgrading the dirvers witch sometimes helps but hardsetting speed and duplex to 100/full on both sides is you best bet. ""Bill Carter"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have been seeing a lot of problems with 3COM NIC's If the switch is > forced 100/full and the NIC is auto we get a lot of errors, if NIC is forced > 100/Full errors go away. If Switch and 3Com NIC left to auto switch will > come up 100/full and NIC 100/half. > > You have to make sure the NIC is also forced. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Michael Williams > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Errors on Ethernet Ports on 6500?!?!?! [7:32853] > > > This is wild stuff, so I thought I'd run it by GroupStudy to see if anyone > had seen this before or knew what caused it. > > We're currently migrating connections from a 5513+RSM to a new > 6509+Sup2/MSFC2. There were three ethernet connections, that upon being > moved from the 5500 to the 6500, starting showing input errors and CRC > errors. When these connections were moved, the port on the 6500 was > configured identically to the same port on the 5500 as far as speed, duplex, > VLAN assignment, and spanning tree settings. > > These same devices (same patch cables and all) created no errors on the 5500 > whatsoever. > > Here's the kicker: When we went back and changed the port speed/duplex to > "auto" on the 6500, it negociated the same speed/duplex settings we had > forced, but now there were no more errors. (i.e. a server set for 100-Full, > that was plugged into a switchport on the 5500 forced to 100-Full was fine, > but plugged into a port on the 6500 forced to 100-Full caused errors, and > plugged into the exact same 6500 port set for "auto" speed/duplex had no > errors.) > > Any ideas on why letting the switch detect settings caused no errors while > forcing it to those same settings causes errors? > > Thanks, > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33731&t=32853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Default-informatin originate always [7:33729]
Regarding this command... "Default-information originate [always]" this is documented as saying... this generates the default route into OSPF even if the path to the default route goes down... and... even when the router has no default route, with the magic keyword "always" it will create a "default route"...pointing to where?? Q: What's the point of advertising a route if it is indeed DOWN? Isn't this like saying i know that Exit5 is closed but I'm gona keep directing all motorists to go to Exit 5 anyway? Please clarify this for me. Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33729&t=33729 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please confirm (conf#fb792ccfb07217442883ed571180717a) [7:33732]
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quarta-feira, 30 de Janeiro de 2002 17:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please confirm (conf#fb792ccfb07217442883ed571180717a) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 12:31:24 2002 Received: from invicto.rumos.pt ([192.199.26.5]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19494 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:31:23 -0500 Received: by INVICTO with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:35:28 - Message-ID: From: Paulo Baptista To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" Subject: IPX host static name possible? Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:35:22 - MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all! Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host name to an IPX address. Like we do for IP addresses This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. Thanks for any reply, Paulo --_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" IPX host static name possible? Hi all! Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host name to an IPX address. Like we do for IP addresses <(config)# ip host NAME x.x.x.x> This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. Thanks for any reply, Paulo --_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40-- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33732&t=33732 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPX question - can workstations see the fake servers configed [7:33733]
Sorry, my attempts to test this locally have failed miserably due to other ( related ) IPX problems. If I configure SAP sources on a router - i.e. servers and printers - will I be able to see those "devices" when I browse using network neighborhood on a Windoze PC? Chuck aside - I installed the Microsoft client for Novell networks and experience a similar problem to the one described by my customer - takes a long time for a login screen to appear. agonizingly slow browsing, etc. I have a Dell with a 3com card, so I need to update my drivers, as has been discussed elsewhere ;-> Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33733&t=33733 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
Patrick Donlon wrote: > Positive, if you look at the show port (on the other mail) you'll see there > are no collisions As the port is in full duplex, the fact that it doesn't show any collisions doesn't mean anything, as it doesn't look for them. I agree with the previous poster: triple-check the NIC in the RS6000. Lots of runts, CRC errors and alignment errors on a FDX port is an almost-sure sign that the other end is set to half duplex. Regards, Marco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33735&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPX host static name possible? [7:33736]
Hi all! Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host name to an IPX address. Like we do for IP addresses This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. Thanks for any reply, Paulo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33736&t=33736 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Essentials [7:33737]
Can anyone give some advice as to the best and most reasonable place to pick up a switch and router to help complete my home lab? Thanks! David Cooper CCNP-Routing and Switching CCDP-Routing and Switching NNCSE-Nortel Networks Certified Support Expert NNCDE- Nortel Networks Certified Design Expert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33737&t=33737 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPX host static name possible? [7:33736]
Maybe if you ask one more time someone will answer. You only asked four times in ten minutes and the requirement to get an answer is five. ""Paulo Baptista"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all! > > Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host > name to an IPX address. > Like we do for IP addresses > This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. > > Thanks for any reply, > > Paulo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33738&t=33736 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
It's sad that you are supposedly a CCIE candidate and you cannot read the web site stating what equipment you are expected to know for the exam. On top of that you request people violate the NDA they signed by telling you the exact composite of the rack! ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to > 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have > wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. > > >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan > 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor > too much. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, > January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent > One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except > in RTP they said not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already > calibrated it before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in > message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. > In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle > you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > tone/ring > on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 > PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab > Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a > monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that most of the > equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: > Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? > [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken the > new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers did > you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? What > models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it still > the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > work on > it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > http://www.hotmail.com > >_ >Do You > Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33739&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP problem [7:33636]
personally, I would call the telco and whine and complain and rant and rave at them. It may not be their problem ( based on the problem description ) but it's a great stress reliever. It is also possible that there is a hardware problem. perhaps a TAC case should be opened? Also, it is possible that the IOS image is corrupt. One can still download similar images from CCO, provided one has a contract. I agree- EIGRP would be the last place I would look as a cause. Chuck ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > You don't have an EIGRP problem, the routing protocol has nothing to > do with an interface being up or down. 12.0.8 is prey old, before > beating your head I would upgrade the IOS. > > Dave > > Vajira Wijesinghe wrote: > > > > I have a 2610 router having IP IOS software (12.0.8). > > This is connected to two different sites with 64kbps links. > > eg > > interface serial 0/0 > > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 > > > > interface serial 0/1 > > ip address 192.168.1.5 255.255.255.252 > > > > router is running with routing protocol EIGRP > > > > router eigrp 100 > > network 192.168.1.0 > > > > Problem: > > > > I'm able to work with only ONE serial link at a time. > > ie. > > If one serial link is active, other one becomes "line protocol down" > > If I remove the cable of the UP interface, the OTHER interface become UP > > > > I suspect this is due to the operation of EIGRP > > Because I cannot configure subnet mask for the network defined under > > eigrp 100 > > This particular IOS doesn't allow me to do this and DRAM and FLASH > > limitation prevents me from upgrading the IOS. > > > > Can any one tell me how to overcome the situation? > > > > Thanks, > > Vajira > > > > 12.0.8 ip > > - (on postoffice) > > > > The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be > > read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit > > http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire > > confidentiality clause. > > > > - > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33740&t=33636 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Router? [7:33639]
Hello, Thank you for all your input. I will be looking into a few different possibilities from the ideas you guys and gals came up with and had experience with installations. Thanx Scott >Hello Everybody, > >I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. > >Scenario: >I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity >running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to >the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I >just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. > >My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. > >Thank you for the input. > >Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33741&t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
idle curiousity - in what way(s) would you expect that the telnet client would effect your work in the lab? Chuck ""Thomas Crowe"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know what telnet client you get to use in the lab? That could > make a BIG difference in how well you are able to work? > > __ > > Thomas Crowe > Senior Systems Engineer / Architect > CTS Professional Services - Atlanta > __ > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to > 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have > wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. > > >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan > 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor > too much. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, > January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent > One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except > in RTP they said not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already > calibrated it before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in > message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. > In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle > you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > tone/ring > on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 > PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab > Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment just a > monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that most of the > equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: > Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? > [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken the > new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers did > you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? What > models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it still > the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > work on > it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and > > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > http://www.hotmail.com > >_ >Do You > Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name > of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33742&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Router? [7:33639]
Have you checked the utilization on those 2650's? I'd bet it's never gotten above 15%. The 2650's can handle a lot more than 1 t-1's worth of traffic. -Ejay -Original Message- From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Internet Router? [7:33639] The 3640 will work for you. I would definitely max out the RAM. Some others have commented about not needing full BGP route tables. My customers have been very happy with partial tables as described in the following CCO link. I have also had customers use 2 2650's, 1 T-1 per connection box, HSRP on the Ethernet port and run IBGP between each other for optimal routing. I then configured them with the below link. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/41.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Nawalaniec Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Internet Router? [7:33639] Hello Everybody, I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. Scenario: I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. Thank you for the input. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33743&t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Router problem inserting into token ring [7:33304]
Thank you all for your replies. I have solved the problem, apparently these MAU's are not capable of 16mb speeds. I chaned the speed on the token ring cards and the routers to 4mb and everything is working great. I don't need 16mb anyway because this is a non production lab. Thank you all for you help. Joseph J. Slawinski AT&T Global Networks Network Technician CCNP,CCNA,A+,Apple,HP,Canon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33744&t=33304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please confirm (conf#fb792ccfb07217442883ed571180717a) [7:33734]
-Original Message- From: Paulo Baptista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Please confirm (conf#fb792ccfb07217442883ed571180717a) [7:33732] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quarta-feira, 30 de Janeiro de 2002 17:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please confirm (conf#fb792ccfb07217442883ed571180717a) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 12:31:24 2002 Received: from invicto.rumos.pt ([192.199.26.5]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19494 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:31:23 -0500 Received: by INVICTO with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:35:28 - Message-ID: From: Paulo Baptista To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" Subject: IPX host static name possible? Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:35:22 - MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all! Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host name to an IPX address. Like we do for IP addresses This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. Thanks for any reply, Paulo --_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" IPX host static name possible? Hi all! Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host name to an IPX address. Like we do for IP addresses <(config)# ip host NAME x.x.x.x> This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. Thanks for any reply, Paulo --_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40-- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33734&t=33734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714]
3 ""Grad Alfons Kanon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > team, > > For Cisco QoS configuration below, which one we should configure on both > routers which one is not..? > > > 1. RED/WRED > 2. FRTS/GTS > 3. rSVP > 4. CAR > 5. CQ, PQ > 6. RTP..? > > > thanks > > > Grad > > _ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33747&t=33714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714]
I believe RSVP and RTP should be configured on both ends. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714] 3 ""Grad Alfons Kanon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > team, > > For Cisco QoS configuration below, which one we should configure on > both routers which one is not..? > > > 1. RED/WRED > 2. FRTS/GTS > 3. rSVP > 4. CAR > 5. CQ, PQ > 6. RTP..? > > > thanks > > > Grad > > _ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33749&t=33714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714]
RTP as in Real Time Protocol? It's not even a command. It's a transport layer addition to UDP. You really can't tell a router to use RTP. You can tell it to do cRTP, or ip rtp priority. cRTP is both ends, IP RTP priority doesn't have to be. But RTP isn't even a valid choice. ""Jim Brown"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I believe RSVP and RTP should be configured on both ends. > > -Original Message- > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714] > > > 3 > ""Grad Alfons Kanon"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > team, > > > > For Cisco QoS configuration below, which one we should configure on > > both routers which one is not..? > > > > > > 1. RED/WRED > > 2. FRTS/GTS > > 3. rSVP > > 4. CAR > > 5. CQ, PQ > > 6. RTP..? > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > Grad > > > > _ > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33750&t=33714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pbx Fundamentals [7:33680]
You planning on copying in the entire test for people to answer for you? - Original Message - From: "salimss" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:53 AM Subject: Fw: Pbx Fundamentals [7:33680] > - Original Message - > From: salimss > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:10 PM > Subject: Pbx Fundamentals > > > Could u pls answer the following questions. > > > > > 1) The SIP protocol is based upon which other protocol model? > > > a. H.323 > b. MGCP >c. HTTP/WWW > d. HTML > 2) Which of the following are common trunk circuit usage types? > > > a. One way in only > b. One way out only > c. Two way in or out > d. All of the above > e. None of the above > > 3) The term "non-blocking" when applied to a PBX indicates: > > > a. LCR is unable to restrict calls > b. The number of trunks is equal or in excess of the number of > stations > c. Subscribers have access to all features such as call transfers, > conference, call pickup > d. The switch does not support Class of Service > e. There are enough time-slots to support every station engaging in > a > call simultaneously > > 4) In the Europe, ___ line code is required for ISDN PRI. > > > a. AMI > b. HDB3 > c. B8ZS > d. HDLC > > 5) SS-7 is mandatory to provide national and international ISDN. > > > a. True > b. False > > 6) PBX proprietary private networking cannot be supported across the data > network? > > > a. True > b. False > > 7) Circuit switched networks are very flexible and can easily adapt to > handle new applications. > > > a. True > b. False > > 8) The component of a PBX that manages the use of timeslots/speech > paths is the . > > > a. Control complex > b. Switching complex > c. Terminal interface > d. None of the above > > 9) ___ is/are an example(s) of Call Center data that > can > be collected from a PBX. > > > a. Trunk a call entered on > b. Length of time a call waited > c. How long a caller talked to each agent > d. All of the above > > 10) Cell based switching is more efficient than frame based switching. > > > a. True > b. False > > 11) Q.Sig as opposed to DPNSS does not require a D-channel. > > > a. True > b. False > > 12) E&M signaling is used for which of the following? > > > a. Trunk groups from electromechanical offices > b. Centrex tie lines > c. Trunks for Centrex for private networks > d. A multitude of private line applications > e. B and C > f. All of the above > > 13) In the ISDN LAP-D format, the _ bits identify which > network entity should process the frame. > > > a. Terminal Endpoint Identifier (TEI) > b. Command/Response (C/R) > c. Extended Address (EA) > d. Service Access Point Identifier (SAPI) > > > 14) The ability for a PBX system to account for usage costs is > known as __. > > > a. Call Detail Recording > b. Station Message Detail Recording > c. Call Accounting > d. CDR > e. All of the above _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33696&t=33680 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco equipment [7:33664]
the router prices you were quoted were very good, however memory/flash considerations should be looked at. 1924-a/en and 2924-xl can be gotten for less on ebay (300$ and 550) respectively, modules can be gotten for less on ebay as well. Definately look into buying the routers though. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33709&t=33664 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what to do ? (longish) [7:33392] -Reply [7:33745]
I think he means CISSP (Certified Information Systems Security Professional). If you want to know more about it check www.isc2.org >>> "Cisco Nuts" 01/29/02 06:51pm >>> CSSP?? Is that a new cert regarding MPLS. I know about the new CCIP but CSSP? :-( >From: "Brad Ellis" >Reply-To: "Brad Ellis" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: what to do ? (longish) [7:33392] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:15:05 -0500 > >Why do you want to complete the other certs? Is there something extra they >will do for you that your current standing wont? If not, then go for your >CCIE. If the other certs will open other doors for you in your current >position (or in the seeking of another position), determine where you would >like to be 1yr, 2yr, 5yrs from now and follow that path accordingly (ie, if >you want to eventually become a CCIE in Security, then go the CSS1 route, >if >you want to become a CCIE in C&S go for the CSSP, etc). > >Just my personal thoughts. > >(also, your post isn't that long...go look in the archives at howard's >posts...those are long!) > >thanks, >-Brad Ellis >CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) >Network Learning Inc >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net >CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html > >""Johnny McKenzie"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm contemplating my next move, finished my CCNP, and am currently >studying > > for my CCIE written. But I'm a long way from being ready for the CCIE >lab, > > probally a year or more. In the meantime, I would like to complete some >other > > cisco certs. > > > > So I see some options as follows: > > > > Do my DA and DP. Two papers for two certs is pretty tempting. But it is >the > > infamous CID exam, and I'm not sure how much design I'm going to do > > > > Follow Ole's footsteps and do CSS1 - Security will always be a good >field > > (thanks for the switching apps Ole) > > > > Do the CSSP - And become a MPLS guy - looks like a growth area > > > > Study hard and go straight for CCIE R&S > > > > And thoughts on other options ? > > > > > > At my new job ( large telco ) I've been looking for an area to upskill >and >no > > one has done anything about IPv6. Done some research and it appears that > > deployment is still in very early stages. Anybody else doing much here ? > > Could this be a good chance to be first in the door for what will be the > > biggest upgrade ever ? > > > > Thanks for your input > > > > Johnny _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33745&t=33745 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab Essentials [7:33737]
My personal choices would be either eBay or Brad Ellis at Optsys ( www.optsys.net ). I have purchased equipment from both. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Cooper, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lab Essentials [7:33737] Can anyone give some advice as to the best and most reasonable place to pick up a switch and router to help complete my home lab? Thanks! David Cooper CCNP-Routing and Switching CCDP-Routing and Switching NNCSE-Nortel Networks Certified Support Expert NNCDE- Nortel Networks Certified Design Expert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33746&t=33737 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab Essentials [7:33737]
Rather than a place I'll mention some situations: 1) Your employer gives/loans you some gear. 2) You are aware of a company that ceases business. They directly sell you gear. 3) You buy equipment coming off lease. Either you have a contact with the leasing company or know the buyout price for the company holding the gear. 4) Similar to (2). An auction of a company that has gone out of business. Problem is that many can be bidding. 5) An equipment reseller. Many acquire their inventory by one of the above methods. 6) eBay auctions. Always a good place to look under "completed auctions" to get an idea of fair value. Decide which switch and which router and start hunting. Good luck! > -Original Message- > From: Cooper, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Lab Essentials [7:33737] > > > Can anyone give some advice as to the best and most > reasonable place to pick > up a switch and router to help complete my home lab? Thanks! > > David Cooper > CCNP-Routing and Switching > CCDP-Routing and Switching > NNCSE-Nortel Networks Certified Support Expert > NNCDE- Nortel Networks Certified Design Expert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33748&t=33737 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP problem [7:33636]
You should be looking down a couple layers. EIGRP operation can't cause the line protocol to go down. The line protocol being down indicates a data-link layer problem or maybe a physical-layer problem. What more can you tell us about this installation? There must be some more clues if you refocus your attention away from EIGRP. Priscilla At 11:13 PM 1/29/02, Vajira Wijesinghe wrote: >I have a 2610 router having IP IOS software (12.0.8). >This is connected to two different sites with 64kbps links. >eg >interface serial 0/0 >ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 > >interface serial 0/1 >ip address 192.168.1.5 255.255.255.252 > >router is running with routing protocol EIGRP > >router eigrp 100 >network 192.168.1.0 > > >Problem: > >I'm able to work with only ONE serial link at a time. >ie. >If one serial link is active, other one becomes "line protocol down" >If I remove the cable of the UP interface, the OTHER interface become UP > >I suspect this is due to the operation of EIGRP >Because I cannot configure subnet mask for the network defined under >eigrp 100 >This particular IOS doesn't allow me to do this and DRAM and FLASH >limitation prevents me from upgrading the IOS. > >Can any one tell me how to overcome the situation? > >Thanks, >Vajira > > > > > > > >12.0.8 ip >- (on postoffice) > >The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be >read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit >http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire >confidentiality clause. > >- Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33751&t=33636 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
I don't believe that "Cisco Nuts" is breaking the NDA by asking what equipment is in the lab. Cisco gives this information out freely on their site but they have a habit of not updating it when they add new equipment to the lab. It's bad enough we have to fork out all that money to take the lab (the average is about three times). The least we should know is what equipment we're going to be working on so we can simulate our home labs to match the actual lab. Just my opinion. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: c1sc0k1d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] It's sad that you are supposedly a CCIE candidate and you cannot read the web site stating what equipment you are expected to know for the exam. On top of that you request people violate the NDA they signed by telling you the exact composite of the rack! ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed > to 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem > to have wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. > Sad.. > > >From: "Louie Belt" >Reply-To: "Louie Belt" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] >Date: Tue, 29 Jan > 2002 19:57:21 -0500 > >You'll go blind if you touch your flux > capacitor too much. > >-Original Message- >From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >c1sc0k1d >Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:35 PM >To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? > [7:33592] > > >I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except in RTP they said > not to touch the flux >capacitor as the proctor already calibrated it > before the lab started. > > > > >""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm surprised. In > san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to >the > > cubicle > you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial > > > tone/ring on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. > > > > -Ejay > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: McCallum, Robert > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 > 3:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Recent One-Day > Lab Takers?? [7:33592] > > > > > > I never actually saw any equipment > just a monitor and keyboard. I could > > hazzard a guess though that > most of the equipment was Cisco. ;-> > > > > -Original > Message- > > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? > [7:33592] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone is this group taken > the new one-day lab recently? Wanted to >know > > what kind of routers > did you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or > > still just 6? > What models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, > > is it > still the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and > > > work on it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab > and > > busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > http://www.hotmail.com > >_ >Do You > Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > -- > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click > Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33752&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714]
I would bet my last dollar the original poster is referring to cRTP. This is why I included it into the "both ends" category. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714] RTP as in Real Time Protocol? It's not even a command. It's a transport layer addition to UDP. You really can't tell a router to use RTP. You can tell it to do cRTP, or ip rtp priority. cRTP is both ends, IP RTP priority doesn't have to be. But RTP isn't even a valid choice. ""Jim Brown"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I believe RSVP and RTP should be configured on both ends. > > -Original Message- > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714] > > > 3 > ""Grad Alfons Kanon"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > team, > > > > For Cisco QoS configuration below, which one we should configure on > > both routers which one is not..? > > > > > > 1. RED/WRED > > 2. FRTS/GTS > > 3. rSVP > > 4. CAR > > 5. CQ, PQ > > 6. RTP..? > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > Grad > > > > _ > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33753&t=33714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Router? [7:33639]
The highest I have seen was around 20% when I did a clear bgp ne * Great boxes and the Ethernet interface is 100MB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Internet Router? [7:33639] Have you checked the utilization on those 2650's? I'd bet it's never gotten above 15%. The 2650's can handle a lot more than 1 t-1's worth of traffic. -Ejay -Original Message- From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Internet Router? [7:33639] The 3640 will work for you. I would definitely max out the RAM. Some others have commented about not needing full BGP route tables. My customers have been very happy with partial tables as described in the following CCO link. I have also had customers use 2 2650's, 1 T-1 per connection box, HSRP on the Ethernet port and run IBGP between each other for optimal routing. I then configured them with the below link. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/41.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Nawalaniec Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Internet Router? [7:33639] Hello Everybody, I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. Scenario: I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. Thank you for the input. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33754&t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
At 09:35 AM 1/30/02, Patrick Donlon wrote: >Positive, if you look at the show port (on the other mail) you'll see there >are no collisions This side is set (or auto-negotiated) to full duplex. Receiving while sending is not an error. This side should never report a collision. That doesn't mean that there can't be a duplex-mode mismatch. A mismatch could result in both sides reporting errors, just of different sorts. The other side could be set (or auto-negotiated) to half-duplex. You should check if it has errors, including collisions. If the half-duplex side does its normal CSMA/CD thing, senses no data, and happens to send while the other side is sending, the result is a collision from the half-duplex sender's viewpoint. The half-duplex side stops sending and backs off, in the middle of its frame. The result is probably a runt with either an alignment and/or Frame Check Sequence (FCS) error. The recipient receives an errored frame, even though it can't correlate this with a collision event. The recipient reports a runt and/or FCS or alignment error. Now, if you are sure that you don't have the obvious problem that everyone is going to assume you have (duplex mismatch), and you are still seeing alignment and FCS errors, then it's time to start investigating what else besides collisions could damage frames. An FCS means that the FCS placed in the frame by the sender doesn't match the FCS calculated by the recipient. In other words, a bit got changed. An alignment error means that the frame didn't end on an 8-bit boundary. In other words, a bit got dropped. Besides collisions, these errors could be caused by crosstalk, impedance mismatch, noise, running a power generator next the cables, lightning strikes, etc. Hope that makes sense. Please let us know the resolution. It will be a good learning experience. Priscilla >Thanks > > >""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like >port > > speed/duplex mismatch. > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi Everyone > > > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on >a > > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > > > some > > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there >were > > > the > > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find > > any > > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Patrick Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33755&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PBX course [7:33756]
Someone mentioned theere being an online course for PBX fundamentals. Is this a free resource? I checked cisco.com, but I may have missed it. Thanks, Ejay Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33756&t=33756 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPAN question for 6000 IDSM [7:33757]
Hi, How do I go about SPANning multiple vlans to a port. I have a 6000 IDSM blade in slot 9 and the monitoring port is 1. However, I can only span one vlan (one ingress session for both directions) at any one time. "set span "vlan#" 9/1" Running this command again for another vlan will only make the previous vlan inactive for SPANning. My goal is to SPAN several (15) vlans or ALL the vlans. Any suggestions? thanks, Telemachus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33757&t=33757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How prevalent is ISL in the "real world"? [7:33758]
Is ISL still widely used? Are there still many shops out there using it? (I assume Cisco only outfits) It seems that Cisco has all but dropped support for it in favor of dot1q. Sean Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33758&t=33758 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How prevalent is ISL in the "real world"? [7:33759]
Is ISL still widely used? Are there still many shops out there using it? (I assume Cisco only outfits) It seems that Cisco has all but dropped support for it in favor of dot1q. Sean Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33759&t=33759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IGRP over EIGRP...How?? [7:33760]
Hello, I have 3 routers running both Eigrp 1 and Igrp 100. I configed. a distance of 4 for Igrp so that it would be the preferred protocol but the routing table shows both Eigrp and Igrp learned route for the same netw. I am trying to understand why? I expected to only see Igrp learned routes since the lower admin dist. of 4 would take over Eigrp's dist. of 90...but it is not apparently so. Any ideas? Thank you. Example on RTC: 6.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks D 6.6.6.6/32 [90/4064] via 192.168.10.241, 00:00:05, Serial0 I 6.0.0.0/8 [4/158750] via 192.168.10.241, 00:00:05, Serial Config. on RTC: ! router eigrp 1 passive-interface Ethernet0 network 7.0.0.0 network 192.168.10.0 no auto-summary ! router igrp 100 passive-interface Ethernet0 network 7.0.0.0 network 192.168.10.0 distance 4 ! _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33760&t=33760 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Internet Router? [7:33639]
Take a look at the 7401 - only 1 RU and plenty of ram available... Berry At 11:45 PM 1/29/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Hello Everybody, > >I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. > >Scenario: >I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity >running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to >the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I >just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. > >My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. > >Thank you for the input. > >Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33761&t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Router? [7:33639]
Partial tables are probably fine. If you must do full tables (probably due to a customer power trip) and your customer will have BGP connections to two or more ASes (ISPs) then I'd strongly recommend a box that can handle 128MB. 64 just isn't enough to crunch all those paths, I've seen quite a few 7200s with 64mb blow up in that very environment. --- Mike Bernico [EMAIL PROTECTED] Illinois Century Network http://www.illinois.net (217) 557-6555 > -Original Message- > From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Internet Router? [7:33639] > > > The highest I have seen was around 20% when I did a clear bgp ne * > > Great boxes and the Ethernet interface is 100MB > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Hire, Ejay > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Internet Router? [7:33639] > > > Have you checked the utilization on those 2650's? I'd bet > it's never gotten > above 15%. The 2650's can handle a lot more than 1 t-1's > worth of traffic. > > -Ejay > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Internet Router? [7:33639] > > > The 3640 will work for you. I would definitely max out the RAM. Some > others have commented about not needing full BGP route > tables. My customers > have been very happy with partial tables as described in the > following CCO > link. I have also had customers use 2 2650's, 1 T-1 per > connection box, > HSRP on the Ethernet port and run IBGP between each other for optimal > routing. I then configured them with the below link. > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/41.shtml > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Scott Nawalaniec > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Internet Router? [7:33639] > > > Hello Everybody, > > I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. > > Scenario: > I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing > Internet connectivity > running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 > PTP T1's to > the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for > BGP routes. I > just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. > > My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or > a HSSI port. > > Thank you for the input. > > Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33762&t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How prevalent is ISL in the "real world"? [7:33758]
There are lots of ISL trunks still working, if it ain't broke... But yes the direction is dot1q and I have been suggesting customers consider dot1q on new installs. The original argument, dot1q does not support per VLAN spanning, is no longer valid. Dave Sean Knox wrote: > > Is ISL still widely used? Are there still many shops out there using it? (I > assume Cisco only outfits) It seems that Cisco has all but dropped support > for it in favor of dot1q. > > Sean -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33763&t=33758 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
I'm sure we'll keep seeing this problem for years to come... Auto negotiate does NOT work properly for a lot of NICs with older drivers. If you can, upgrade the driver on the RS6000. I know a while back IBM used the 3Com chipset in RS6000s, I don't know if that's true anymore but I bet it is. IBM may or may not have a driver that addresses this issue, in which case you are going to have to force the duplex on the RS6000 to full and do the same on the switch. - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:38 PM Subject: Re: ethernet errors explained [7:33687] > At 09:35 AM 1/30/02, Patrick Donlon wrote: > >Positive, if you look at the show port (on the other mail) you'll see there > >are no collisions > > This side is set (or auto-negotiated) to full duplex. Receiving while > sending is not an error. This side should never report a collision. That > doesn't mean that there can't be a duplex-mode mismatch. A mismatch could > result in both sides reporting errors, just of different sorts. > > The other side could be set (or auto-negotiated) to half-duplex. You should > check if it has errors, including collisions. If the half-duplex side does > its normal CSMA/CD thing, senses no data, and happens to send while the > other side is sending, the result is a collision from the half-duplex > sender's viewpoint. The half-duplex side stops sending and backs off, in > the middle of its frame. The result is probably a runt with either an > alignment and/or Frame Check Sequence (FCS) error. The recipient receives > an errored frame, even though it can't correlate this with a collision > event. The recipient reports a runt and/or FCS or alignment error. > > Now, if you are sure that you don't have the obvious problem that everyone > is going to assume you have (duplex mismatch), and you are still seeing > alignment and FCS errors, then it's time to start investigating what else > besides collisions could damage frames. An FCS means that the FCS placed in > the frame by the sender doesn't match the FCS calculated by the recipient. > In other words, a bit got changed. An alignment error means that the frame > didn't end on an 8-bit boundary. In other words, a bit got dropped. > > Besides collisions, these errors could be caused by crosstalk, impedance > mismatch, noise, running a power generator next the cables, lightning > strikes, etc. > > Hope that makes sense. Please let us know the resolution. It will be a good > learning experience. > > Priscilla > > > >Thanks > > > > > >""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like > >port > > > speed/duplex mismatch. > > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Hi Everyone > > > > > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see > on > >a > > > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was > experiencing > > > > some > > > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there > >were > > > > the > > > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't > find > > > any > > > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Patrick > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33764&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
