call pickup by external modem [7:37532]
An external modem needs to be initialized to auto-answer in order to dial-up to work. So when I swith modem off and back on I have to manually do ats0=1. Is there any way to make it more automatic? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37532t=37532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice over IP [7:37298]
OK, I'll bite What's the drawbacks or gotcha's of choosing the 3810 over a 2600 or 3600 router?? In comparison, this is what I came up with so far: 1. No WIC modularity to speak of... you're stuck with DB-60 Serial interfaces. 2. Only one 10BT interface, so no VLAN routing :( Is this the ONLY reason why those units are much less expensive than the 1700s, 2600s, or 3600s?? Surely not! Can you do a cross-over cable between a couple of these units on their MFT T1 cards?? This would be great for VoATM simulations. As a side note, I didn't find an EOL listing for the MC3810, so I guess that is a positive. waiting patiently for reply input. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Voice over IP [7:37298] If you are ebay shopping, you can get a 3810 for cheaper than the 2600's or 3600's. Use this Ebay search (no quotes) +cisco (3810,mc3810) -nokia -singer -att -att -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Voice over IP [7:37298] Greetings all, What is the minimum equipment I need to setup/test VoIP? I've a lot 26XX and 36XX routers around here. Any suggestions would be great. ThanksNabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37520t=37298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written -Query [7:37247]
Thanks Neil, FOr your response. BTW have u taken ur written and if so how tough it is to select the right no of answers from the maximum possible options. THanks Naresh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37533t=37247 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QoS fro VPN connection [7:37534]
Hello, I Have a following problem. I have Cisco 1750 router with vpn ipsec tunnel to PIX ( Central Office) I want to encrypt with IPSEC traffic to Central LAN, but I want traffic destined for inerrnet goes through central PIX too, so I have to tunnel this traffic ( e.g with IPSEC AH) Now I have 2 questions: 1. AM I right, that Pix cannot route the incomming packet out to the same interface, so I need e.g. Proxy in central LAN where traffic destined for internet can go through? 2. Is that any way to set up some QoS for traffic on 1751 router going to central LAN ( give this traffic higher priority than traffic for the internet) Problem is packet going to central LAN and going to the internet via central PIX will have the same IP header (after IPSEC encryprtion) I found a feature called QoS for VPN but this is for 2600 and bigger router Thanks for any help. Emil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37534t=37534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: certificationZone Bridging White paper ! [7:37393]
SNIP The RIF is just referenced (not changed) in frames that are specifically routed. In other words, once the end station has found a route, it just puts it in the frame and the bridges just read it forwards or backwards and route accordingly. Could that be what he's getting at?? END SNIP I'm not sure what he's getting at really. I agree with your explanation above but also this would be the same process for a pure SRB also !!! I think it is fair to say that a Transparent bridge never adds or removes RIFS since it doesn't use one. But to use the expression in a SRT or SR/TL bridge is misleading and very confusing without a bit of an explanation of route selection. Thanks for the link. Fun with it ??? Doubtful. Phil. http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/ Have fun with it! --- Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 08:34 AM 3/6/02, Phil Barker wrote: Just been re-reading this paper by David Wolfsener. See SNIP below. In the instance where the RII indicator is a 1 the frame will be 'source routed' if the frame is 'source routed' then surely this implies that the RIF must be manipulated in order to reflect the true Source Route The RIF is just referenced (not changed) in frames that are specifically routed. In other words, once the end station has found a route, it just puts it in the frame and the bridges just read it forwards or backwards and route accordingly. Could that be what he's getting at?? On the other hand, I agree with you that on an explorer, an SRT bridge changes the RIF. SRT simply implies a couple things: 1) If the RII is zero, just perform normal Ethernet-style transparent bridging 2) If the RII is one and redundant bridges exits, use the spanning tree to determine which way to forward explorer frames. By the way, SRT is the only form of source route bridging that the IEEE ever standardized. And you can get it for free! ;-) It's in Annex C of IEEE 802.1D, which you can get here: http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/ Have fun with it! Priscilla !!! I havn't got my 'Interconnections' with me so I cannot confirm. Any ideas ? Phil. SNIP Source Route Transparent Bridging (SRT) SRT works by analyzing the RII bit to determine if a RIF is present. If the RII bit is 0, then a RIF is not present and the frame is transparently bridged. If, however, the RII bit is 1 and a RIF is present, then the frame is source routed. Note that SRT bridges do not add or remove RIFs to frames. By now, you ought to wonder how to configure SRT. END __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37535t=37393 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: QoS fro VPN connection [7:37534]
You are right, 1. The pix will not redirect traffic out the same interface it came from. You will need a proxy or another router on the inside. 2. Don't know about the 2nd part of your ? jason -Original Message- From: Emil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: QoS fro VPN connection [7:37534] Hello, I Have a following problem. I have Cisco 1750 router with vpn ipsec tunnel to PIX ( Central Office) I want to encrypt with IPSEC traffic to Central LAN, but I want traffic destined for inerrnet goes through central PIX too, so I have to tunnel this traffic ( e.g with IPSEC AH) Now I have 2 questions: 1. AM I right, that Pix cannot route the incomming packet out to the same interface, so I need e.g. Proxy in central LAN where traffic destined for internet can go through? 2. Is that any way to set up some QoS for traffic on 1751 router going to central LAN ( give this traffic higher priority than traffic for the internet) Problem is packet going to central LAN and going to the internet via central PIX will have the same IP header (after IPSEC encryprtion) I found a feature called QoS for VPN but this is for 2600 and bigger router Thanks for any help. Emil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37536t=37534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE #8886 [7:37530]
Great job. Richard Newman, CCIE#8878, CCNP, CCDP Zwaanswijk, John wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear all At last it is my turn to write this email, I've got my number at my fourth attemp in Brussel last Monday I was not a very active member of this group (sorry for that), but I've learned a lot of things from you all. I thank you all for the help and the answers you gave me. My advise for everybody is study and practice as much as you can. Good luck for anyone who is going to take his exam in the future Regards John Zwaanswijk CCIE #8886 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37538t=37530 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
Great job. Richard Newman, CCIE#8878, CCNP, CCDP George Zhang wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on Passing the CCIE Lab! this morning. I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax yesterday. I was told that there was another person scheduled yesterday but did not show up. My test started about 8:15 AM in the morning. We broke for lunch at about 12:20PM. By then, I only finished all the IGP stuff and felt some pressure on time. But I have already reviewed rest of the test and knew that I could go through the rest quickly. After the 15 min lunch break, I worked through rest of the test very quickly. By about 3:00 PM, I finished every thing except one small requirement that I had no clue how to do it. I decided to skip that item. Then, I started reviewing and checking my config. Along the way of reviewing/checking, I spotted and fixed a few issues. Just about the time I finished reviewing every thing, the proctor walked in and told me that it' time. I looked at the watch. It was 4:30 PM. My proctor was Steve. Steve is a great proctor. He answered quite a few of my questions and cleared my mis-understanding and confusion about the requirements of the test. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all people who helped me to achieve my goal. First, I would like to thank my wife for her support and understanding. Without her support, there is no way I could achieve my goal. Next, I will give my thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred of NetMasterClass. As I said earlier, the NMC1 class is the most important part of my final preparation. Thanks to Katie Wong of Cisco who scheduled me to access the ASET racks. Thats my primary resource for hands-on practices for the past couple of months. Thanks to Eric Fairfield for lending me a few routers when I was in Wisconsin. Also thanks to those that I've either studied with or have helped me one way or another. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as my story, I started my quest of the Cisco certifications a little over two and half years ago. I got my CCNA and CCNP in the first year. Three months later, I passed the CCIE written test. I wanted to take the lab a year ago. However, due to work and personal reasons, I did not get time to do it until now. Last year, I was too busy to do much study. At work, as a consultant, I was billing at least 40 hours/week for the whole year. At home, my second child was born in February, my wife finished school in July, and we moved to New Jersey from Wisconsin in September. In October of last year, I foresaw a window of opportunity for me to take the lab test early this year. Then, I lobbed my manager to let me go to the ECP1 class. By the time my manager approved my training request, I found that Mentor Technologies went belly up. However, I learned that Bruce and Val founded a new company called NetMasterClass, LLC (www.netmasterclass.net) and offering the NMC1 and NMC2 classes. I registered and took the NMC1 class by the end January. By the end of last year, the project I worked on finished. So since the beginning of this year I got a lot of time to study. For the past couple of months, I have studied 8-10 hours every day. As far as how I prepared, I have read most of the books (Doyle I II, Caslow, Halabi, Tam-Nam-Kee, Solie, Satterlee, etc.) recommended by people on this list. Among this long list of books, the only one I dont like is Solies book because there are too many errors in the book. There are a few topics I was more confused after reading the book. I dont have a home lab. So my primary resource for hands-on practice is remote labs such as Mentor Technologies vlabs (not available any more), Cisco ASET lab. Because I dont have a home lab, my preparation included more reading than hands-on practice. That actually worked out very well for me. Above all, the most important part of my preparation is the NMC1 class taught by Bruce, Val and Fred. IF I HAD NOT TAKEN THE NMC1 CLASS, IT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE TAKEN ME ONE OR TWO MORE ATTEMPTS BEFORE I COULD GET MY NUMBER. There are a lot of things that just cannot be learned from reading books or practicing. So the NMC1 class helped me to fill in that gap very well. It also helped me to access my strength and weakness. So I know what to study on the last few weeks. I strongly recommend taking the NMC1 class a few weeks before your lab date. Thanks again. George Zhang CCIE#8903, CCNA, CCNP Sr. Network Architect Compuware Corpration 1 Meadowlands Plaza, Suite 1050 East Rutherford, NJ 07073 732-494-0288 _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
Rich, I don't think you're a CCNP any more. I think the CCIE supercedes that. Am I correct? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Richard Newman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Great job. Richard Newman, CCIE#8878, CCNP, CCDP George Zhang wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on Passing the CCIE Lab! this morning. I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax yesterday. I was told that there was another person scheduled yesterday but did not show up. My test started about 8:15 AM in the morning. We broke for lunch at about 12:20PM. By then, I only finished all the IGP stuff and felt some pressure on time. But I have already reviewed rest of the test and knew that I could go through the rest quickly. After the 15 min lunch break, I worked through rest of the test very quickly. By about 3:00 PM, I finished every thing except one small requirement that I had no clue how to do it. I decided to skip that item. Then, I started reviewing and checking my config. Along the way of reviewing/checking, I spotted and fixed a few issues. Just about the time I finished reviewing every thing, the proctor walked in and told me that it' time. I looked at the watch. It was 4:30 PM. My proctor was Steve. Steve is a great proctor. He answered quite a few of my questions and cleared my mis-understanding and confusion about the requirements of the test. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all people who helped me to achieve my goal. First, I would like to thank my wife for her support and understanding. Without her support, there is no way I could achieve my goal. Next, I will give my thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred of NetMasterClass. As I said earlier, the NMC1 class is the most important part of my final preparation. Thanks to Katie Wong of Cisco who scheduled me to access the ASET racks. Thats my primary resource for hands-on practices for the past couple of months. Thanks to Eric Fairfield for lending me a few routers when I was in Wisconsin. Also thanks to those that I've either studied with or have helped me one way or another. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as my story, I started my quest of the Cisco certifications a little over two and half years ago. I got my CCNA and CCNP in the first year. Three months later, I passed the CCIE written test. I wanted to take the lab a year ago. However, due to work and personal reasons, I did not get time to do it until now. Last year, I was too busy to do much study. At work, as a consultant, I was billing at least 40 hours/week for the whole year. At home, my second child was born in February, my wife finished school in July, and we moved to New Jersey from Wisconsin in September. In October of last year, I foresaw a window of opportunity for me to take the lab test early this year. Then, I lobbed my manager to let me go to the ECP1 class. By the time my manager approved my training request, I found that Mentor Technologies went belly up. However, I learned that Bruce and Val founded a new company called NetMasterClass, LLC (www.netmasterclass.net) and offering the NMC1 and NMC2 classes. I registered and took the NMC1 class by the end January. By the end of last year, the project I worked on finished. So since the beginning of this year I got a lot of time to study. For the past couple of months, I have studied 8-10 hours every day. As far as how I prepared, I have read most of the books (Doyle I II, Caslow, Halabi, Tam-Nam-Kee, Solie, Satterlee, etc.) recommended by people on this list. Among this long list of books, the only one I dont like is Solies book because there are too many errors in the book. There are a few topics I was more confused after reading the book. I dont have a home lab. So my primary resource for hands-on practice is remote labs such as Mentor Technologies vlabs (not available any more), Cisco ASET lab. Because I dont have a home lab, my preparation included more reading than hands-on practice. That actually worked out very well for me. Above all, the most important part of my preparation is the NMC1 class taught by Bruce, Val and Fred. IF I HAD NOT TAKEN THE NMC1 CLASS, IT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE TAKEN ME ONE OR TWO MORE ATTEMPTS BEFORE I COULD GET MY NUMBER. There are a lot of things that just cannot be learned from reading books or practicing. So the NMC1 class helped me to fill in that gap very well. It also helped me to access my strength and weakness. So I know what to study on the last few weeks. I strongly recommend taking the NMC1 class a few weeks before your lab date. Thanks again. George Zhang
RE: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
George - Way to go Congratulations!! Thanks for encouraging the rest of us. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37540t=37490 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN Solution [7:37541]
Hi all, my company is trying to look at the different VPN vendors out there for a VPN solution. Has anyone any idea what criteria to look out for?. For those people who have implemented a full VPN solution on a large scale, how is the performance?. What product did you use. We are getting a lot of offfer from different vendors and it looks like we are just revolving on the same spot. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37541t=37541 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: call pickup by external modem [7:37532]
This can be automated by using modem definitions. (at the console) conf t modemcap edit newmodem misc FS0=1 line aux 0 (assuming you are using aux 0, was not specified) modem autoconfigure type newmodem flowcontrol hard modem InOut transport input all login (optional, but you don't want people to dial in and get an exec prompt without logging in) password whatever (same reason as above) Now whenever the modem resets, it will be reset into autoanswer waiting for 1 ring. Unless you have a cabling problem that should get it working. Make sure you can reverse telnet to the modem. Since you didn't give a model number, I can't tell you what the rev telnet port will be for your router. Look it up at www.cisco.com. 2600's are port 2065 for aux 0. 2500's are port 2001 if I recall correctly. If you cannot rev telnet, check your cables. You should be using a rollover to a RJ45 - (9pin or 25 pin) cisco adapter with modem somewhere on the label. You should be able to type commands directly to the modem and get an OK. -Jason www.CCIEwannabe.com - Afforable Remote Cisco Lab Access. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37542t=37532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543]
I swear I get more error messages on my stuff than anyone! I must have that magic 'static' toouch or something! So here is the problem: I have a 6506 hooked up with both power supplies plugged in and everything says 'green'- everything except module 6 which is a 16 port gigabit card. It was working and I was pinging all downstream switches as of Tuesday afternoon. I noticed in Show Version that somehow the switch was rebooted on Tuesday night (I think it lost power and since it is not quite production it is not yet plugged into a UPS). Well, since the reboot, module 6 has been unable to register. I get the error message: SYS-5-MOD_NOREGISTRATION: No registration received from module 6...resetting module. Cisco website doesnt say much on the topic except that the module will be rebooted until it registers...but it never registers. So I guess the questions I have are 1) Has anyone ever seen this before, and 2) Could it be related to power problems? Thanks for any help. James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37543t=37543 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco IOS for 3524 switch [7:37544]
I am having strange problems with a Cisco Switch. Any devcie a pug into it, switch hub whatever is really slow. I noticed the IOS is IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.2)XU, MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE on a sh ver , what does MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE mean? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37544t=37544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543]
Does the fact that it wasn't on a UPS imply that it also wasn't on a surge supressor? extrapolate conclusion. --Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37545t=37543 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444]
If you test date is a long way off, or you are close by, start walking now. Remember to pack food and supplies for cold and warm weather. Also, a rain poncho may be wise. Carry or search for a cardboard box (the only approved Homeless/bum shelter approved for use within San Jose). Find a space to sleep either near the cisco compound or near a light-rail station. Transportation from Box to Cisco: Take the light-rail. USUALLY nobody will even check for a ticket. If the transit police DO check, at least you have a better place to sleep tomorrow night. Seriously, though, things are not cheap in San Jose. BUT, the do have an abundance of Starbucks Coffee Installations, where jack-booted Caffiene-Nazi's are likely to force you to consume the People's Drink. --Tim James wrote: Hello, I hope to get some advice from those who attempted the lab in San Jose. I have a lab scheduled soon and hope that someone can let me know where to stay at the best rates, travel arrangements from hotel to Cisco, etc.. any information is greatly appreciated. Thank you __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37546t=37444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422]
I read this and wept for joy. Then I went out to spread the good tidings to the networking masses. They were likewise moved to tears. --Tim -for God Loveth a Cheerful Cynic.Steven A. Ridder wrote: I'm in a meeting with the CCIE program manager and they will be removing Token-ring soon! -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Scott H. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Not that bad. A bunch of dates open in March and April in San Jose--if you can't do that, you are screwed until August. The one thing that I have noticed is that when people get within their 28 day window, they drop their date. This opens up dates for the more serious contenders. Best of luck! Scott AMR wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What's the wait time like nowadays? -A Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37547t=37422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE #8886 [7:37530]
Congatulations John --- Zwaanswijk, John wrote: Dear all At last it is my turn to write this email, I've got my number at my fourth attemp in Brussel last Monday I was not a very active member of this group (sorry for that), but I've learned a lot of things from you all. I thank you all for the help and the answers you gave me. My advise for everybody is study and practice as much as you can. Good luck for anyone who is going to take his exam in the future Regards John Zwaanswijk CCIE #8886 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37548t=37530 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
article [7:37549]
I found this article, just thought it was interesting. Most people I know seem to be very happy with Cisco =20 http://news.com.com/2009-1033-852570.html =20 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of image001.jpg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37549t=37549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422]
Chuck, Got a good laugh out of your statement Cisco will just go find some other piece of junk to throw a monkey wrench into your network! I couldn't agree more with that! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422] be careful what you wish for.. better the devil you know than the devil you don't. ;- I'm convinced the Cat 3920 was there just to screw with people. Now that there are lots of practice racks, not to mention a very good software simulator, Cisco will just go find some other piece of junk to throw a monkey wrench into your network. somebody else had the correct analysis. There's no big deal to configuring token ring - or ethernet for that matter. hmmm if I were Cisco, what would I do next? Maybe some things that require more than one switch? maybe put in some different transport? Cisco Nuts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... hoorraayyy!! From: William Gragido Reply-To: William Gragido To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422] Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:52:08 -0500 AWESOME -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422] I'm in a meeting with the CCIE program manager and they will be removing Token-ring soon! -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Scott H. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Not that bad. A bunch of dates open in March and April in San Jose--if you can't do that, you are screwed until August. The one thing that I have noticed is that when people get within their 28 day window, they drop their date. This opens up dates for the more serious contenders. Best of luck! Scott AMR wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What's the wait time like nowadays? -A _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37551t=37422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNA [7:37473]
Most testing-centers prefer Vue Kazan, Naim wrote: I am looking to take the exam soon. Do you guys prefer Prometric over Vue testing center or does it matter. -Original Message- From: Dennis Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422] the question should be : What are they replacing it with Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in a meeting with the CCIE program manager and they will be removing Token-ring soon! -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Scott H. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Not that bad. A bunch of dates open in March and April in San Jose--if you can't do that, you are screwed until August. The one thing that I have noticed is that when people get within their 28 day window, they drop their date. This opens up dates for the more serious contenders. Best of luck! Scott AMR wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What's the wait time like nowadays? -A Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37552t=37473 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco IOS for 3524 switch [7:37544]
That software version is fine. I run it on 200 Cat 3500XL's and 2900XL's. Sounds like you are have a duplex mismatch problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sam sneed Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco IOS for 3524 switch [7:37544] I am having strange problems with a Cisco Switch. Any devcie a pug into it, switch hub whatever is really slow. I noticed the IOS is IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.2)XU, MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE on a sh ver , what does MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE mean? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37550t=37544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE #8886 [7:37530]
Congratulations John, I'm happy for you that you finally made it. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Zwaanswijk, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE #8886 [7:37530] Dear all At last it is my turn to write this email, I've got my number at my fourth attemp in Brussel last Monday I was not a very active member of this group (sorry for that), but I've learned a lot of things from you all. I thank you all for the help and the answers you gave me. My advise for everybody is study and practice as much as you can. Good luck for anyone who is going to take his exam in the future Regards John Zwaanswijk CCIE #8886 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37554t=37530 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: confreg 0x2922 ??? [7:37318]
Thanks Kelly, I wasn't aware of that. However, it does not change the fact that it is enabled with the bit is set. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Kelly Cobean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: confreg 0x2922 ??? [7:37318] Actually, you SAY you can use break, but the reference to break in regards to the config-register means break while the router is running which is very dangerous since anyone with access to the console of the router could inadvertently pass the break sequence and cause all routing to cease. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Drews Jensen Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: confreg 0x2922 ??? [7:37318] Well, let's see it from a different angle. Normally, the left byte is 21 hex, which is 0011 binary. Here bit 8 and 13 are set (bits 0 thru 7 are in the right byte). This is what I normally have, and I can use BREAK, so it must be enabled. I also use 9600 as the baud rate, so that makes sense too. If you set bit 11, the baud rate will now change to 4800. That gives a binary pattern of 00101001, which is 29 hex, which is what your left hex (most significant byte) is set to. I don't know where you got the calculator, but I would trust Cisco's documentation (which is what I am refering to) before I would trust someone's homemade application tool. A good way to find out, would be to disable bit 8 (set it to 0) and try to use BREAK. Then try to change the values of bit 11 and 12 and see what baud rate you have to configure to talk with the router. That's not only a good way to find out what's what, but a good exercise for your studies. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:32 AM To: 'Ole Drews Jensen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: confreg 0x2922 ??? [7:37318] So what is the final answer, is the calculator correct or is Ole? -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:54 PM To: Lupi, Guy; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: confreg 0x2922 ??? [7:37318] I do not agree with you. The 2922 means that the following bits are set : 1, 5, 8, 11 and 13. If bit 8 is set, break will be enabled. If bit 11 is set but not 12, baud rate will be 4800. I have this from (watch the word wrap): http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/fun_r /frprt2/frreboot.htm#xtocid135347 Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: confreg 0x2922 ??? [7:37318] According to my config register calculator, the 9 means 9600 baud rate and break is disabled. -Original Message- From: brian kastor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: confreg 0x2922 ??? [7:37318] I have found a reason for the second '2' in this, but anyone know what the 9 is??? cisco.com says it is undefined. We are getting this on one of the 3640's running 12.2.6c nobody remembers setting anything differently?? aha, bk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37555t=37318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
Congratulations George, Thank you very much for all your info - I appreciate that. Have fun, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: George Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE#8903 [7:37490] All, The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on Passing the CCIE Lab! this morning. I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax yesterday. I was told that there was another person scheduled yesterday but did not show up. My test started about 8:15 AM in the morning. We broke for lunch at about 12:20PM. By then, I only finished all the IGP stuff and felt some pressure on time. But I have already reviewed rest of the test and knew that I could go through the rest quickly. After the 15 min lunch break, I worked through rest of the test very quickly. By about 3:00 PM, I finished every thing except one small requirement that I had no clue how to do it. I decided to skip that item. Then, I started reviewing and checking my config. Along the way of reviewing/checking, I spotted and fixed a few issues. Just about the time I finished reviewing every thing, the proctor walked in and told me that it' time. I looked at the watch. It was 4:30 PM. My proctor was Steve. Steve is a great proctor. He answered quite a few of my questions and cleared my mis-understanding and confusion about the requirements of the test. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all people who helped me to achieve my goal. First, I would like to thank my wife for her support and understanding. Without her support, there is no way I could achieve my goal. Next, I will give my thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred of NetMasterClass. As I said earlier, the NMC1 class is the most important part of my final preparation. Thanks to Katie Wong of Cisco who scheduled me to access the ASET racks. Thats my primary resource for hands-on practices for the past couple of months. Thanks to Eric Fairfield for lending me a few routers when I was in Wisconsin. Also thanks to those that I've either studied with or have helped me one way or another. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as my story, I started my quest of the Cisco certifications a little over two and half years ago. I got my CCNA and CCNP in the first year. Three months later, I passed the CCIE written test. I wanted to take the lab a year ago. However, due to work and personal reasons, I did not get time to do it until now. Last year, I was too busy to do much study. At work, as a consultant, I was billing at least 40 hours/week for the whole year. At home, my second child was born in February, my wife finished school in July, and we moved to New Jersey from Wisconsin in September. In October of last year, I foresaw a window of opportunity for me to take the lab test early this year. Then, I lobbed my manager to let me go to the ECP1 class. By the time my manager approved my training request, I found that Mentor Technologies went belly up. However, I learned that Bruce and Val founded a new company called NetMasterClass, LLC (www.netmasterclass.net) and offering the NMC1 and NMC2 classes. I registered and took the NMC1 class by the end January. By the end of last year, the project I worked on finished. So since the beginning of this year I got a lot of time to study. For the past couple of months, I have studied 8-10 hours every day. As far as how I prepared, I have read most of the books (Doyle I II, Caslow, Halabi, Tam-Nam-Kee, Solie, Satterlee, etc.) recommended by people on this list. Among this long list of books, the only one I dont like is Solies book because there are too many errors in the book. There are a few topics I was more confused after reading the book. I dont have a home lab. So my primary resource for hands-on practice is remote labs such as Mentor Technologies vlabs (not available any more), Cisco ASET lab. Because I dont have a home lab, my preparation included more reading than hands-on practice. That actually worked out very well for me. Above all, the most important part of my preparation is the NMC1 class taught by Bruce, Val and Fred. IF I HAD NOT TAKEN THE NMC1 CLASS, IT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE TAKEN ME ONE OR TWO MORE ATTEMPTS BEFORE I COULD GET MY NUMBER. There are a lot of things that just cannot be learned from reading books or practicing. So the NMC1 class helped me to fill in that gap very well. It also helped me to access my strength and
Slow FTP, -- [7:37557]
Hi all,, Need some help,, I have a WAN link going from here at Maryland to Canada, using VPN switch at both end. I have Raptor firewall on one side and Checkpoint at Canada site, Canada site using NAT at their firewall to translate address,, Everything is fine except FTP is extremely slow. Trace show FTP slow respond FTP slow first respond... Canada site is not using DNS and have static mapping of their NAT address. and can not reverse lookup to original address. Help.. Thanks in advance.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37557t=37557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: QoS fro VPN connection [7:37534]
For QoS on tunnels you must pre-classify the traffic before encryption and tunneling take place. You can do this on GRE, L2F/L2TP, and IPSec tunnels. If you are doing an Ipsec tunnel the commands you want to look at are (config)Crypto map secured-partner-x (config-crypto-map)Qos pre-classify Sincerely, Patrick J. Greene Information Technologies Enterprises, LLC Visit our Managed Hosting Division at www.AlwaysWEB.com -Original Message- From: Emil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: QoS fro VPN connection [7:37534] Hello, I Have a following problem. I have Cisco 1750 router with vpn ipsec tunnel to PIX ( Central Office) I want to encrypt with IPSEC traffic to Central LAN, but I want traffic destined for inerrnet goes through central PIX too, so I have to tunnel this traffic ( e.g with IPSEC AH) Now I have 2 questions: 1. AM I right, that Pix cannot route the incomming packet out to the same interface, so I need e.g. Proxy in central LAN where traffic destined for internet can go through? 2. Is that any way to set up some QoS for traffic on 1751 router going to central LAN ( give this traffic higher priority than traffic for the internet) Problem is packet going to central LAN and going to the internet via central PIX will have the same IP header (after IPSEC encryprtion) I found a feature called QoS for VPN but this is for 2600 and bigger router Thanks for any help. Emil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37556t=37534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco IOS for 3524 switch [7:37544]
MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE Interim builds on a major and consolidated Cisco IOS Technology releases. From: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/620/4.html#banners Are you seeing any errors when you do a show interface? Is this switch different from any similar switches that you maintain? My first thoughts are speed and duplex mismatches between the switch ports and the attached PCs. -Original Message- From: sam sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco IOS for 3524 switch [7:37544] I am having strange problems with a Cisco Switch. Any devcie a pug into it, switch hub whatever is really slow. I noticed the IOS is IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.2)XU, MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE on a sh ver , what does MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE mean? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37560t=37544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543]
Also consider that the blade may have failed and caused the reboot. Hope that it is covered under warranty or a Service Contract. -Original Message- From: Fraasch James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543] I swear I get more error messages on my stuff than anyone! I must have that magic 'static' toouch or something! So here is the problem: I have a 6506 hooked up with both power supplies plugged in and everything says 'green'- everything except module 6 which is a 16 port gigabit card. It was working and I was pinging all downstream switches as of Tuesday afternoon. I noticed in Show Version that somehow the switch was rebooted on Tuesday night (I think it lost power and since it is not quite production it is not yet plugged into a UPS). Well, since the reboot, module 6 has been unable to register. I get the error message: SYS-5-MOD_NOREGISTRATION: No registration received from module 6...resetting module. Cisco website doesnt say much on the topic except that the module will be rebooted until it registers...but it never registers. So I guess the questions I have are 1) Has anyone ever seen this before, and 2) Could it be related to power problems? Thanks for any help. James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37561t=37543 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543]
I've never seen anything like this myself, but... If it is not considered Production yet, why don't you just power the whole switch down, re-seat the GIG line card, and then power it back up?!? Of course, make sure you are console connected so you can watch the boot process. Aside from that, I would think that maybe you should look at your SmartNet contract and call TAC for a possible replacement (and start watching the rest of the switch for possible further power damage. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fraasch James Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543] I swear I get more error messages on my stuff than anyone! I must have that magic 'static' toouch or something! So here is the problem: I have a 6506 hooked up with both power supplies plugged in and everything says 'green'- everything except module 6 which is a 16 port gigabit card. It was working and I was pinging all downstream switches as of Tuesday afternoon. I noticed in Show Version that somehow the switch was rebooted on Tuesday night (I think it lost power and since it is not quite production it is not yet plugged into a UPS). Well, since the reboot, module 6 has been unable to register. I get the error message: SYS-5-MOD_NOREGISTRATION: No registration received from module 6...resetting module. Cisco website doesnt say much on the topic except that the module will be rebooted until it registers...but it never registers. So I guess the questions I have are 1) Has anyone ever seen this before, and 2) Could it be related to power problems? Thanks for any help. James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37563t=37543 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444]
There is a $50/night motel 6 with a denny's in the parking lot that is okay.I can't remember the name of the street it's on, but it's only about 2 mi. from the hq. -Ejay -Original Message- From: timothy thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444] If you test date is a long way off, or you are close by, start walking now. Remember to pack food and supplies for cold and warm weather. Also, a rain poncho may be wise. Carry or search for a cardboard box (the only approved Homeless/bum shelter approved for use within San Jose). Find a space to sleep either near the cisco compound or near a light-rail station. Transportation from Box to Cisco: Take the light-rail. USUALLY nobody will even check for a ticket. If the transit police DO check, at least you have a better place to sleep tomorrow night. Seriously, though, things are not cheap in San Jose. BUT, the do have an abundance of Starbucks Coffee Installations, where jack-booted Caffiene-Nazi's are likely to force you to consume the People's Drink. --Tim James wrote: Hello, I hope to get some advice from those who attempted the lab in San Jose. I have a lab scheduled soon and hope that someone can let me know where to stay at the best rates, travel arrangements from hotel to Cisco, etc.. any information is greatly appreciated. Thank you __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37564t=37444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: non unique mac addresses [7:37508]
Isn't there a command like standby use-bia xxx.. where you can specify the MAc to use? -Ejay -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: non unique mac addresses [7:37508] yes, along the line you mentioned, the new sup-II/MSFC-2 will only have 16 hsrp groups available...which means the groups will have to be re-used... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ashish Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: non unique mac addresses [7:37508] Hi, Today only I came to know that HSRP uses the following MAC address on all media except Token Ring: .0c07.ac** (where ** is the HSRP group number) No wonder why I saw non unique mac addresses on cisco boxes. Now my problem is that I am working on an application which assumes that each cisco box will have a unique mac address, set aside multicast and broadcast mac addresses. Can anyone help me out and let me know other scenarios where cisco boxes use such common mac addresses as in HSRP. Thanks, Ashish Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37565t=37508 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
You are correct. Since there are no prerequisites to CCIE, he is still a CCNP/CCDP. I believe they've recently amended the recertification rules, though. If you are a current CCIE, I _believe_ you don't have to continually recertify your lower-level certs. John Sean Knox 3/7/02 12:34:55 PM As you don't need to hold any Cisco certs to get your CCIE, I would assume he's still a CCNP. Anyone else know? Sean -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490] Rich, I don't think you're a CCNP any more. I think the CCIE supercedes that. Am I correct? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Richard Newman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Great job. Richard Newman, CCIE#8878, CCNP, CCDP George Zhang wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on Passing the CCIE Lab! this morning. I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax yesterday. I was told that there was another person scheduled yesterday but did not show up. My test started about 8:15 AM in the morning. We broke for lunch at about 12:20PM. By then, I only finished all the IGP stuff and felt some pressure on time. But I have already reviewed rest of the test and knew that I could go through the rest quickly. After the 15 min lunch break, I worked through rest of the test very quickly. By about 3:00 PM, I finished every thing except one small requirement that I had no clue how to do it. I decided to skip that item. Then, I started reviewing and checking my config. Along the way of reviewing/checking, I spotted and fixed a few issues. Just about the time I finished reviewing every thing, the proctor walked in and told me that it' time. I looked at the watch. It was 4:30 PM. My proctor was Steve. Steve is a great proctor. He answered quite a few of my questions and cleared my mis-understanding and confusion about the requirements of the test. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all people who helped me to achieve my goal. First, I would like to thank my wife for her support and understanding. Without her support, there is no way I could achieve my goal. Next, I will give my thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred of NetMasterClass. As I said earlier, the NMC1 class is the most important part of my final preparation. Thanks to Katie Wong of Cisco who scheduled me to access the ASET racks. That s my primary resource for hands-on practices for the past couple of months. Thanks to Eric Fairfield for lending me a few routers when I was in Wisconsin. Also thanks to those that I've either studied with or have helped me one way or another. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as my story, I started my quest of the Cisco certifications a little over two and half years ago. I got my CCNA and CCNP in the first year. Three months later, I passed the CCIE written test. I wanted to take the lab a year ago. However, due to work and personal reasons, I did not get time to do it until now. Last year, I was too busy to do much study. At work, as a consultant, I was billing at least 40 hours/week for the whole year. At home, my second child was born in February, my wife finished school in July, and we moved to New Jersey from Wisconsin in September. In October of last year, I foresaw a window of opportunity for me to take the lab test early this year. Then, I lobbed my manager to let me go to the ECP1 class. By the time my manager approved my training request, I found that Mentor Technologies went belly up. However, I learned that Bruce and Val founded a new company called NetMasterClass, LLC (www.netmasterclass.net) and offering the NMC1 and NMC2 classes. I registered and took the NMC1 class by the end January. By the end of last year, the project I worked on finished. So since the beginning of this year I got a lot of time to study. For the past couple of months, I have studied 8-10 hours every day. As far as how I prepared, I have read most of the books (Doyle I II, Caslow, Halabi, Tam-Nam-Kee, Solie, Satterlee, etc.) recommended by people on this list. Among this long list of books, the only one I don t like is Solie s book because there are too many errors in the book. There are a few topics I was more confused after reading the book. I don t have a home lab. So my primary resource for hands-on practice is remote labs such as Mentor Technologies vlabs (not available any more), Cisco ASET lab. Because I don t have a home lab, my preparation included more reading than hands-on practice. That actually worked out very well for me. Above all, the
RE: certificationZone Bridging White paper ! [7:37393]
Ken, What I was getting at was that the SRB part of the SRT bridge is still acting as a SRB bridge for those nodes on that side of the network. Therefore when end hosts on that network try to find a route through this bridge to other end hosts on the SRB side of the network the RIF field will be manipulated (for spanning and explorer packets). So to make the sweeping statement that RIF fields will never change on SRT bridges is very misleading to the newbie, (me in this instance). I conclude that it is safe to say that RIF will never be manipulated on 'Transparent only' Bridges since they don't exist. Thx for the replies, Ken. Phil. --- Sexton, Ken wrote: Phil, Can I therefore conclude that in a 'Source Route Transparent' Bridge the RIF field will indeed change ? Contrary to the whitepaper. On the above - In SRT mode, you are allowing the router to source route traffic and transparently bridge traffic on the same device (router), but any hosts on either bridging environment can not communicate amongst themselves. (i.e. a host on an SRB network cannot sent traffic destined for a host on the transparent side of the network). The SRT Bridge will never add or remove RIF information from a frame in order for the two technologies to communicate. This is where Source-route Translation bridging (SR/TLB) comes in. Now your above question needs some consideration. The router will now act as a RIF end station, where a RIF table will be built for end stations on the SRB side, and a forwarding table for the transparent side. By creating a virtual ring within the router, all the token to ethernet frame conversion will take place (i.e MTU, bit ordering, etc) before the frame is sent on its way. It makes no sense to set the RII bit to a 1 when sending the traffic to a transparent end host, as it will not understand what to do with it anyway. Hope this helps Ken Sexton Data Network Engineering ICG Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: certificationZone Bridging White paper ! [7:37393] Thanks Ken, SNIP2 The first SRB enabled bridge in the path (from originator to destination) will see that this is an explorer packet and add its route designator (RD) information to the RIF. END SNIP2 Can I therefore conclude that in a 'Source Route Transparent' Bridge the RIF field will indeed change ? Contrary to the whitepaper. Phil. --- Sexton, Ken wrote: Phil, The first bit within the Source Address Field is normally the I/G bit, to define if the source address is individual (unicast) or group (multicast) address. In an SRB bridged environment, this one bit is used to indicate if any Routing Information Field (RIF) information is present in the Token frame following the SA field. This bit will be set by hosts with the SRB environment and used by bridges to indicate the above. The hosts will keep a forwarding table on how to reach any required destination host. If the host doesn't know how to get to a particular destination, it will send out an explorer frame (all routes explorer -ARE) or a Spanning tree explorer (SPE) frame to locate the destination. It will depending on your bridged environment which explorer frame is used. The first SRB enabled bridge in the path (from originator to destination) will see that this is an explorer packet and add its route designator (RD) information to the RIF. The first bridge will add the first ring number, it's bridge number, and the ring number of the interface it going to send the explorer packet out of. When all said and done - the host will know how to reach that particular end host and include RIF information in the token frame. The RII, will tell the bridge that a RIF is present and forward the frame according to the RIF RC and RD fields. Ken Sexton Data Network Engineering ICG Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: certificationZone Bridging White paper ! [7:37393] Just been re-reading this paper by David Wolfsener. See SNIP below. In the instance where the RII indicator is a 1 the frame will be 'source routed' if the frame is 'source routed' then surely this implies that the RIF must be manipulated in order to reflect the true Source Route !!! I havn't got my 'Interconnections' with me so I cannot confirm. Any ideas ? Phil. SNIP Source Route Transparent Bridging (SRT) SRT works by analyzing the RII bit to determine if a RIF is present. If the RII bit is 0, then a RIF is not present and the frame is
RE: Cisco 4006 with Sup III [7:37504]
I haven't seen the Sup III for Cat4K's yet but I do have a bit of experience with the L3 cards and am fairly unimpressed. After working with the 6500's (with MSFCs) configuring a Cat4K with L3 module certainly seems like a few steps backwards. My current client has a couple of Cat4K's with L3 modules that we'll be replacing this year with 6509's and MSFCs. Last time I checked (perhaps this is different now) there were only three different versions of IOS available for the L3 module; to make matters worse, the code seemed to be written by the same group that writes 8540 code - based-on my personal experiences with the 8540 platform this didn't give me a high level of comfort. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Kekai Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco 4006 with Sup III [7:37504] Hello, Is anyone out there running Cisco 4006's with the new Sup III? If so what has been your experience with them? We are interested in using a pair of them as distribution switches with L3 capabilities to run OSPF. I know the 4000's had problems with this before so I was wondering if the new Sup III solved some of the old issues. Thanks in advance, Daniel _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37568t=37504 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543]
I cant say I that I have seen that error, so I would advise calling TAC and give them the error. They can tell you what it is and what you should do. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fraasch James Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543] I swear I get more error messages on my stuff than anyone! I must have that magic 'static' toouch or something! So here is the problem: I have a 6506 hooked up with both power supplies plugged in and everything says 'green'- everything except module 6 which is a 16 port gigabit card. It was working and I was pinging all downstream switches as of Tuesday afternoon. I noticed in Show Version that somehow the switch was rebooted on Tuesday night (I think it lost power and since it is not quite production it is not yet plugged into a UPS). Well, since the reboot, module 6 has been unable to register. I get the error message: SYS-5-MOD_NOREGISTRATION: No registration received from module 6...resetting module. Cisco website doesnt say much on the topic except that the module will be rebooted until it registers...but it never registers. So I guess the questions I have are 1) Has anyone ever seen this before, and 2) Could it be related to power problems? Thanks for any help. James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37570t=37543 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN Solution [7:37541]
I use a few different VPN solutions, but my favorite is a Cisco 3000 concentrator and a Cisco 3002 Client... The performance is so good, I am able to do very good voice from NY to Malaysia over this VPN. It is excellent! Good luck, -Original Message- From: Victor Alegun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN Solution [7:37541] Hi all, my company is trying to look at the different VPN vendors out there for a VPN solution. Has anyone any idea what criteria to look out for?. For those people who have implemented a full VPN solution on a large scale, how is the performance?. What product did you use. We are getting a lot of offfer from different vendors and it looks like we are just revolving on the same spot. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37569t=37541 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VG200 [7:37394]
Waleed, You can't do thatThat's why the VG200 is cheaper than your 26XX with WIC support. Nabil Waleed Samir cc: Sent by: Subject: VG200 [7:37394] [EMAIL PROTECTED] om 03/06/2002 08:38 AM Please respond to Waleed Samir Can any one please advice me if I can install in the empty WIC slots in the VG200 WIC-4t or WIC-1T for implementing VOIP. Thanks == Waleed Samir Akl PreSales Networking Engineer Enterprise Communications Department Tritech - A Subsidiary of RAYA Holding 25 Mossadak Street, Dokki, Giza Cairo - P.O.Box 12311 - Egypt www.tritech.com.eg www.rayaholding.com Mobile: +2 012 398 71 98 Tel: +2 02 3368140 - Ext. 400 Fax: +2 02 3366469 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37572t=37394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange problem [7:37359]
Did you sniff the traffic to see where the problem is ? kaushalender cc: Sent by: Subject: strange problem [7:37359] nobody@groups tudy.com 03/05/2002 10:29 PM Please respond to kaushalender Hi group I am facing strange problem one of customer whom we have given 128Kbps linkand connected on ppp ecapsulation. They r not able to browse the website.When i did traceroute and ping it was working fine and customer is able to reach the internet .But when i typed www.yahoo.com in the browser the browser was respoding website found waiting for reply and it keeps on waiting .Can somebody can help me in identifing that why http request is dieng or geting killed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37571t=37359 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNA [7:37473]
FYI, www.2test.com is Prometric. -dlb Chris Tucker wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... i use www.2test.com Kazan, Naim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am looking to take the exam soon. Do you guys prefer Prometric over Vue testing center or does it matter. -Original Message- From: Dennis Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422] the question should be : What are they replacing it with Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in a meeting with the CCIE program manager and they will be removing Token-ring soon! -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Scott H. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Not that bad. A bunch of dates open in March and April in San Jose--if you can't do that, you are screwed until August. The one thing that I have noticed is that when people get within their 28 day window, they drop their date. This opens up dates for the more serious contenders. Best of luck! Scott AMR wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What's the wait time like nowadays? -A Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37573t=37473 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: wireless cert [7:37574]
Has any one taken the cisco wireless cert exam. If yes, what study material did you use. Is there anything besides the presentation on Cisco's CCO. Thanks Joe R. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37574t=37574 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
The CCIE does not supercede CCNP. They are different certification programs, managed by different departments at Cisco. A person can be both CCNP and CCIE. CCNP means that he or she has gone through the Career Certification Program, which last I knew was still managed by Cisco's training department. CCIE is a different program, managed by TAC I think, with no prereqs from the Career Certification Program. In reality, he'll probably stop referring to CCNP at some point, since CCIE already means that he's a guru. But there's no requirement he do this and maybe it doesn't even make sense. CCNP is a separate achievement that warrants respect on its own. Anyway, Congratulations, George! First try too! Great job. Priscilla At 02:34 PM 3/7/02, Sean Knox wrote: As you don't need to hold any Cisco certs to get your CCIE, I would assume he's still a CCNP. Anyone else know? Sean -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490] Rich, I don't think you're a CCNP any more. I think the CCIE supercedes that. Am I correct? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Richard Newman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Great job. Richard Newman, CCIE#8878, CCNP, CCDP George Zhang wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on Passing the CCIE Lab! this morning. I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax yesterday. I was told that there was another person scheduled yesterday but did not show up. My test started about 8:15 AM in the morning. We broke for lunch at about 12:20PM. By then, I only finished all the IGP stuff and felt some pressure on time. But I have already reviewed rest of the test and knew that I could go through the rest quickly. After the 15 min lunch break, I worked through rest of the test very quickly. By about 3:00 PM, I finished every thing except one small requirement that I had no clue how to do it. I decided to skip that item. Then, I started reviewing and checking my config. Along the way of reviewing/checking, I spotted and fixed a few issues. Just about the time I finished reviewing every thing, the proctor walked in and told me that it' time. I looked at the watch. It was 4:30 PM. My proctor was Steve. Steve is a great proctor. He answered quite a few of my questions and cleared my mis-understanding and confusion about the requirements of the test. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all people who helped me to achieve my goal. First, I would like to thank my wife for her support and understanding. Without her support, there is no way I could achieve my goal. Next, I will give my thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred of NetMasterClass. As I said earlier, the NMC1 class is the most important part of my final preparation. Thanks to Katie Wong of Cisco who scheduled me to access the ASET racks. Thats my primary resource for hands-on practices for the past couple of months. Thanks to Eric Fairfield for lending me a few routers when I was in Wisconsin. Also thanks to those that I've either studied with or have helped me one way or another. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as my story, I started my quest of the Cisco certifications a little over two and half years ago. I got my CCNA and CCNP in the first year. Three months later, I passed the CCIE written test. I wanted to take the lab a year ago. However, due to work and personal reasons, I did not get time to do it until now. Last year, I was too busy to do much study. At work, as a consultant, I was billing at least 40 hours/week for the whole year. At home, my second child was born in February, my wife finished school in July, and we moved to New Jersey from Wisconsin in September. In October of last year, I foresaw a window of opportunity for me to take the lab test early this year. Then, I lobbed my manager to let me go to the ECP1 class. By the time my manager approved my training request, I found that Mentor Technologies went belly up. However, I learned that Bruce and Val founded a new company called NetMasterClass, LLC (www.netmasterclass.net) and offering the NMC1 and NMC2 classes. I registered and took the NMC1 class by the end January. By the end of last year, the project I worked on finished. So since the beginning of this year I got a lot of time to study. For the past couple of months, I have studied 8-10 hours every day. As far as how I prepared, I have read most of the books (Doyle I II, Caslow, Halabi, Tam-Nam-Kee, Solie, Satterlee, etc.)
Re: CCNA [7:37473]
I have taken tests at both. A number of test centers host both Prometric and Vue. The one I goto always stamps my test with the Prometric seal even if I took the test from Vue. (Hard to get good help!!) I find the Vue easier to deal with than Prometric. I have the good fortune of having a test center that is open on Saturday's for testing. Through Complexity there is Simplicity, Through Simplicity there is Complexity David L. Blair - CCNP, CCNA, MCSE, CBE, CIW Associate, A+, 3Wizard Kazan, Naim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am looking to take the exam soon. Do you guys prefer Prometric over Vue testing center or does it matter. -Original Message- From: Dennis Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422] the question should be : What are they replacing it with Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in a meeting with the CCIE program manager and they will be removing Token-ring soon! -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Scott H. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Not that bad. A bunch of dates open in March and April in San Jose--if you can't do that, you are screwed until August. The one thing that I have noticed is that when people get within their 28 day window, they drop their date. This opens up dates for the more serious contenders. Best of luck! Scott AMR wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What's the wait time like nowadays? -A Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37575t=37473 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444]
Ejay, I think you mean the one in Sunnyvale on Mathilda just off 101? With a Burger King and Hobbee's right there as well. Wish I had a URL to share, but would seem like a good place to stay. Darrell Hire, Ejay wrote: There is a $50/night motel 6 with a denny's in the parking lot that is okay.I can't remember the name of the street it's on, but it's only about 2 mi. from the hq. -Ejay -Original Message- From: timothy thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444] If you test date is a long way off, or you are close by, start walking now. Remember to pack food and supplies for cold and warm weather. Also, a rain poncho may be wise. Carry or search for a cardboard box (the only approved Homeless/bum shelter approved for use within San Jose). Find a space to sleep either near the cisco compound or near a light-rail station. Transportation from Box to Cisco: Take the light-rail. USUALLY nobody will even check for a ticket. If the transit police DO check, at least you have a better place to sleep tomorrow night. Seriously, though, things are not cheap in San Jose. BUT, the do have an abundance of Starbucks Coffee Installations, where jack-booted Caffiene-Nazi's are likely to force you to consume the People's Drink. --Tim James wrote: Hello, I hope to get some advice from those who attempted the lab in San Jose. I have a lab scheduled soon and hope that someone can let me know where to stay at the best rates, travel arrangements from hotel to Cisco, etc.. any information is greatly appreciated. Thank you __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37577t=37444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]
The reply *should* come from the IP that the request arrived at ... ... Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179] When the two outside addresses are resolved to the single inside address (port 80) everything is OK but when the web server sends back a reply which of the address translations with be used? If the wrong one is picked any firewall will choke on it, and if no firewall, the other end of the connection may get traffic from a source address it doesn't know anything about. End result is that the two outside addresses need to be associated with two distict inside addresses. Hope this helps, Scott --- On Mon 03/04, Gaz wrote: Eventually, two separate static commands for two separate outside addresses going to two separate DMZ addresses. At the moment there is just one machine inside. Possibility of putting multiple addresses on the server but preferred option is not to do this. What I would like to miss out is the time required to wait for DNS to propagate when I split the single outside address to two. If I can leave the DNS pointing to two addresses and make the changes at the required time, there is no delay involved. Thanks, Gaz Patrick Ramsey wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... what is the overall goal? Gaz 03/04/02 03:06PM Hi all, Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one internal (DMZ) address on the same port (80) in some way. Not too difficult to get round, as I can get the DNS of one site changed and use the single address outside to single inside. The advantage would be that when the web sites are separated, to two machines inside, I would like to be able to change the pix settings immediately rather than change DNS and wait a couple of days for DNS to propagate. I'm sure there may be some simple way of doing it, but I couldn't find it whilst playing about today. Any ideas welcome. Thanks, Gaz Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37559t=37179 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What should standards be? [7:37578]
I found 3 Cisco routers dumped in the back @ work and plan on putting these in a lab. 2 are 2501 and the other is a CPA-2514. Can anyone point me to a cisco pg where I can find out the diff between the 2501 and the 2514. Also I'm wondering what the standard o/s, memory etc should be for these. I think these may have been in the back since Y2K, so after I reset pwd's I want to upgrade o/s etc... On powerup they display... 1 with System Bootstrap, Version (3.3), SOFTWARE and 2 with System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE 1 with: IOS (tm) 3000 Software (CPA25-G-L), Version 11.1(5), RELEASE SW (fc1 1 with : IOS (tm) 3000 Software (IGS-I-L), Version 10.3(19a), RELEASE SW (fc1) and 1 with: IOS (tm) 3000 Software (IGS-IN-L), Version 10.3(11), RELEASE SW (fc1) If I don't have a cisco pwd for their site, is there somewhere to download current bootstrap and ios? Also any suggestions would be appreciated Thanks Vic../ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37578t=37578 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with Nortel [7:37403]
Hi, try comp.dcom.sys.nortel or comp.dcom.sys.bay-networks or http://www.nortel-forums.com - Original Message - From: David j To: Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: Problems with Nortel [7:37403] I know that this is a Cisco forum, but anybody has been working with Nortel BPS2000 and BayStack 450? We have bought some BPS2000 and Nortel have been having troubles with cascade and fiber modules for a long time. We would be interested in talking with someone who is working with this kind of equipment. By the way, anybody knows a Nortel forum? in the archives people said that there is no one, but perhaps someone has new information. Off the topic. Do you know how to cut a specific connection in a Cisco 2600? I mean, if someone is overloading the line how can I manage to cut (only)his connection? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37579t=37403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: certificationZone Bridging White paper ! [7:37393]
Phil, Can I therefore conclude that in a 'Source Route Transparent' Bridge the RIF field will indeed change ? Contrary to the whitepaper. On the above - In SRT mode, you are allowing the router to source route traffic and transparently bridge traffic on the same device (router), but any hosts on either bridging environment can not communicate amongst themselves. (i.e. a host on an SRB network cannot sent traffic destined for a host on the transparent side of the network). The SRT Bridge will never add or remove RIF information from a frame in order for the two technologies to communicate. This is where Source-route Translation bridging (SR/TLB) comes in. Now your above question needs some consideration. The router will now act as a RIF end station, where a RIF table will be built for end stations on the SRB side, and a forwarding table for the transparent side. By creating a virtual ring within the router, all the token to ethernet frame conversion will take place (i.e MTU, bit ordering, etc) before the frame is sent on its way. It makes no sense to set the RII bit to a 1 when sending the traffic to a transparent end host, as it will not understand what to do with it anyway. Hope this helps Ken Sexton Data Network Engineering ICG Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: certificationZone Bridging White paper ! [7:37393] Thanks Ken, SNIP2 The first SRB enabled bridge in the path (from originator to destination) will see that this is an explorer packet and add its route designator (RD) information to the RIF. END SNIP2 Can I therefore conclude that in a 'Source Route Transparent' Bridge the RIF field will indeed change ? Contrary to the whitepaper. Phil. --- Sexton, Ken wrote: Phil, The first bit within the Source Address Field is normally the I/G bit, to define if the source address is individual (unicast) or group (multicast) address. In an SRB bridged environment, this one bit is used to indicate if any Routing Information Field (RIF) information is present in the Token frame following the SA field. This bit will be set by hosts with the SRB environment and used by bridges to indicate the above. The hosts will keep a forwarding table on how to reach any required destination host. If the host doesn't know how to get to a particular destination, it will send out an explorer frame (all routes explorer -ARE) or a Spanning tree explorer (SPE) frame to locate the destination. It will depending on your bridged environment which explorer frame is used. The first SRB enabled bridge in the path (from originator to destination) will see that this is an explorer packet and add its route designator (RD) information to the RIF. The first bridge will add the first ring number, it's bridge number, and the ring number of the interface it going to send the explorer packet out of. When all said and done - the host will know how to reach that particular end host and include RIF information in the token frame. The RII, will tell the bridge that a RIF is present and forward the frame according to the RIF RC and RD fields. Ken Sexton Data Network Engineering ICG Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: certificationZone Bridging White paper ! [7:37393] Just been re-reading this paper by David Wolfsener. See SNIP below. In the instance where the RII indicator is a 1 the frame will be 'source routed' if the frame is 'source routed' then surely this implies that the RIF must be manipulated in order to reflect the true Source Route !!! I havn't got my 'Interconnections' with me so I cannot confirm. Any ideas ? Phil. SNIP Source Route Transparent Bridging (SRT) SRT works by analyzing the RII bit to determine if a RIF is present. If the RII bit is 0, then a RIF is not present and the frame is transparently bridged. If, however, the RII bit is 1 and a RIF is present, then the frame is source routed. Note that SRT bridges do not add or remove RIFs to frames. By now, you ought to wonder how to configure SRT. END __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37580t=37393 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and
Re: Cisco 4006 with Sup III [7:37504]
I agree, the L3 card is a step back, back to the 6000 and the MSM. The SUPIII is like the MSFC, inter vlan x ... without having to build gig channels and all the BS. Dave R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: I haven't seen the Sup III for Cat4K's yet but I do have a bit of experience with the L3 cards and am fairly unimpressed. After working with the 6500's (with MSFCs) configuring a Cat4K with L3 module certainly seems like a few steps backwards. My current client has a couple of Cat4K's with L3 modules that we'll be replacing this year with 6509's and MSFCs. Last time I checked (perhaps this is different now) there were only three different versions of IOS available for the L3 module; to make matters worse, the code seemed to be written by the same group that writes 8540 code - based-on my personal experiences with the 8540 platform this didn't give me a high level of comfort. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Kekai Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco 4006 with Sup III [7:37504] Hello, Is anyone out there running Cisco 4006's with the new Sup III? If so what has been your experience with them? We are interested in using a pair of them as distribution switches with L3 capabilities to run OSPF. I know the 4000's had problems with this before so I was wondering if the new Sup III solved some of the old issues. Thanks in advance, Daniel _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications Inc. 612-664-3367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37581t=37504 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wireless cert [7:37574]
I passed all three of Cisco's wireless exams, AM, SE, and FE. All the prep material you need is in the VOD files on PEC. I recently took the cwna exam from Planet3 Wireless (www.cwne.com). It's a vendor neutral wireless certification. I used the book, Wireless LANs, Implementing High Performance IEEE 802.11 Networks, by Jim Geier to prepare for the exam as well as some of the Cisco VOD presentations. It's an interesting, well rounded exam, focusing on 802.11 network fundamentals; basic design, implementation, and troubleshooting as well as RF fundamentals were covered. Tim Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice, CCDP Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joseph Rago Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: re: wireless cert [7:37574] Has any one taken the cisco wireless cert exam. If yes, what study material did you use. Is there anything besides the presentation on Cisco's CCO. Thanks Joe R. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37582t=37574 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
after CCNA [7:37583]
hi, I passed CCNA two days back... and now I am thinking of next level of certification. I am thinking of CCNP now. Meanwhile, I was also looking at the option of CWNA (Certified Wireless Network Administrator). Has anyone gone through this certification.and any insights to its recognition in the IT market. Thanks, Ashish Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37583t=37583 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444]
nopes.. there is motel 6 right on brokaw and north 1st street intersection and it is nearest to cisco san jose location. - Original Message - From: Darrell Newcomb To: Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Re: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444] Ejay, I think you mean the one in Sunnyvale on Mathilda just off 101? With a Burger King and Hobbee's right there as well. Wish I had a URL to share, but would seem like a good place to stay. Darrell Hire, Ejay wrote: There is a $50/night motel 6 with a denny's in the parking lot that is okay.I can't remember the name of the street it's on, but it's only about 2 mi. from the hq. -Ejay -Original Message- From: timothy thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444] If you test date is a long way off, or you are close by, start walking now. Remember to pack food and supplies for cold and warm weather. Also, a rain poncho may be wise. Carry or search for a cardboard box (the only approved Homeless/bum shelter approved for use within San Jose). Find a space to sleep either near the cisco compound or near a light-rail station. Transportation from Box to Cisco: Take the light-rail. USUALLY nobody will even check for a ticket. If the transit police DO check, at least you have a better place to sleep tomorrow night. Seriously, though, things are not cheap in San Jose. BUT, the do have an abundance of Starbucks Coffee Installations, where jack-booted Caffiene-Nazi's are likely to force you to consume the People's Drink. --Tim James wrote: Hello, I hope to get some advice from those who attempted the lab in San Jose. I have a lab scheduled soon and hope that someone can let me know where to stay at the best rates, travel arrangements from hotel to Cisco, etc.. any information is greatly appreciated. Thank you __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37584t=37444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What should standards be? [7:37578]
2514 has two ethernets as you have probably surmized. The CPA part sounds like the old cisco pro model, is the chassis a vanilla color?? Cisco quit making the pro line a while back and I never messed with them but I do believe they are upgradeable to full 2500 status. The two routers running boot 5.2.8a (10.2.8a in reality) should be fine. If the other is a Cisco Pro maybe someone else on the list has done the upgrade as I'm not sure what's required. There is no standard IOS or memory, just depends on what IOS you want to download. Dave Vic Mendham wrote: I found 3 Cisco routers dumped in the back @ work and plan on putting these in a lab. 2 are 2501 and the other is a CPA-2514. Can anyone point me to a cisco pg where I can find out the diff between the 2501 and the 2514. Also I'm wondering what the standard o/s, memory etc should be for these. I think these may have been in the back since Y2K, so after I reset pwd's I want to upgrade o/s etc... On powerup they display... 1 with System Bootstrap, Version (3.3), SOFTWARE and 2 with System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE 1 with: IOS (tm) 3000 Software (CPA25-G-L), Version 11.1(5), RELEASE SW (fc1 1 with : IOS (tm) 3000 Software (IGS-I-L), Version 10.3(19a), RELEASE SW (fc1) and 1 with: IOS (tm) 3000 Software (IGS-IN-L), Version 10.3(11), RELEASE SW (fc1) If I don't have a cisco pwd for their site, is there somewhere to download current bootstrap and ios? Also any suggestions would be appreciated Thanks Vic../ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications Inc. 612-664-3367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37585t=37578 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2500 flash memory SIMMs don't work [7:37586]
A couple of months ago I bought some (non-approved) 8M flash for c2500 for $76 per SIMM (ouch). I couldn't write to them. I have now upgraded to bootrom version 11.0(10c)XB2. I still can't write to them. The SIMMs are marked SMART SM73228XV1CAVS0. Does anybody know whether these modules should work? The vendor is a bit unresponsive. rgds Marc Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37586t=37586 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: oc3 config [7:37587]
Guys, I have been reading on the list for sometime, and I am always in awe. Anyone out there know a quick and dirty trick to configure a point to point ATM OC3 between two cisco routers? the line is offered by verizon and I am using 2 7500 cisco routers. help. thanks! jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37587t=37587 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]
I'm taking the Routing Beta tomorrow. Is it really 3 hours instead of 1 hour And was it three hours? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37588t=37500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco IOS for 3524 switch [7:37544]
I manually set the cisco and extreme summit48 switch to 100 full duplex, there are almost no interface errors yet it a file copy happens at 9k/s .ridiculously slow. the servers are sun with the nic's set to full duplex 100 Mb. very strange problem. Bill Carter wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... That software version is fine. I run it on 200 Cat 3500XL's and 2900XL's. Sounds like you are have a duplex mismatch problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sam sneed Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco IOS for 3524 switch [7:37544] I am having strange problems with a Cisco Switch. Any devcie a pug into it, switch hub whatever is really slow. I noticed the IOS is IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.2)XU, MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE on a sh ver , what does MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE mean? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37589t=37544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: after CCNA [7:37583]
How bout this, download Checkpoint firewall software on trial. Download the admin guide from their site.Install it on NT and and get CCSA certified. You could probably finish in less than 5 weeks, less if do it 2 hours a day. ashish wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... hi, I passed CCNA two days back... and now I am thinking of next level of certification. I am thinking of CCNP now. Meanwhile, I was also looking at the option of CWNA (Certified Wireless Network Administrator). Has anyone gone through this certification.and any insights to its recognition in the IT market. Thanks, Ashish Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37593t=37583 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
Actually, if I remember the agreements correctly - you can list the lower level certs (CCxA, CCxP) with the CCIE. It is when you are a CCxP that you should not list the corresponding CCxA. Mike - Original Message - From: Steven A. Ridder To: Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 8:10 AM Subject: Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490] Rich, I don't think you're a CCNP any more. I think the CCIE supercedes that. Am I correct? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Richard Newman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Great job. Richard Newman, CCIE#8878, CCNP, CCDP George Zhang wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on Passing the CCIE Lab! this morning. I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax yesterday. I was told that there was another person scheduled yesterday but did not show up. My test started about 8:15 AM in the morning. We broke for lunch at about 12:20PM. By then, I only finished all the IGP stuff and felt some pressure on time. But I have already reviewed rest of the test and knew that I could go through the rest quickly. After the 15 min lunch break, I worked through rest of the test very quickly. By about 3:00 PM, I finished every thing except one small requirement that I had no clue how to do it. I decided to skip that item. Then, I started reviewing and checking my config. Along the way of reviewing/checking, I spotted and fixed a few issues. Just about the time I finished reviewing every thing, the proctor walked in and told me that it' time. I looked at the watch. It was 4:30 PM. My proctor was Steve. Steve is a great proctor. He answered quite a few of my questions and cleared my mis-understanding and confusion about the requirements of the test. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all people who helped me to achieve my goal. First, I would like to thank my wife for her support and understanding. Without her support, there is no way I could achieve my goal. Next, I will give my thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred of NetMasterClass. As I said earlier, the NMC1 class is the most important part of my final preparation. Thanks to Katie Wong of Cisco who scheduled me to access the ASET racks. Thats my primary resource for hands-on practices for the past couple of months. Thanks to Eric Fairfield for lending me a few routers when I was in Wisconsin. Also thanks to those that I've either studied with or have helped me one way or another. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as my story, I started my quest of the Cisco certifications a little over two and half years ago. I got my CCNA and CCNP in the first year. Three months later, I passed the CCIE written test. I wanted to take the lab a year ago. However, due to work and personal reasons, I did not get time to do it until now. Last year, I was too busy to do much study. At work, as a consultant, I was billing at least 40 hours/week for the whole year. At home, my second child was born in February, my wife finished school in July, and we moved to New Jersey from Wisconsin in September. In October of last year, I foresaw a window of opportunity for me to take the lab test early this year. Then, I lobbed my manager to let me go to the ECP1 class. By the time my manager approved my training request, I found that Mentor Technologies went belly up. However, I learned that Bruce and Val founded a new company called NetMasterClass, LLC (www.netmasterclass.net) and offering the NMC1 and NMC2 classes. I registered and took the NMC1 class by the end January. By the end of last year, the project I worked on finished. So since the beginning of this year I got a lot of time to study. For the past couple of months, I have studied 8-10 hours every day. As far as how I prepared, I have read most of the books (Doyle I II, Caslow, Halabi, Tam-Nam-Kee, Solie, Satterlee, etc.) recommended by people on this list. Among this long list of books, the only one I dont like is Solies book because there are too many errors in the book. There are a few topics I was more confused after reading the book. I dont have a home lab. So my primary resource for hands-on practice is remote labs such as Mentor Technologies vlabs (not available any more), Cisco ASET lab. Because I dont have a home lab, my preparation included more reading than hands-on practice. That actually worked out very well for me. Above all, the most important part of my preparation is the NMC1 class taught by Bruce, Val and Fred. IF I HAD NOT TAKEN THE NMC1 CLASS, IT PROBABLY WOULD
CCNP LAB QUESTION [7:37595]
Hi All, I am studying to take the BSCN exam for CCNP track and I have two questions, one about building a frame-relay lab/switch and the other about serial connections. I have three routers a cisco 1605 and two cisco 1720s they each have two WIC cards with integrated cscu/dsu. the 1605 has the same type of WIC card. I know the commands to make the router, for example, the 1720 with two WIC cards, to act as a frame relay switch. can you tell me what other equipment I need to be able to actually create the FR cloud and to be able to connect the other routers with serial interfaces into it? Second question: are there any equipment out there that can simulate a serial connection such as ppp or hdlc? I appreciate any feedback. thx. Tony __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37595t=37595 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2nd try - 2501 console port doesn't like reverse telnet [7:37597]
Gurus, I posted this question a few days ago, but didn't get anywhere. I thought I might try again with a slightly different explanation of the problem. The last explanation got me a lots of kind advice about how to setup and use a reverse telnet connection, but that's not what I need. I have 12 routers, mostly 25xx's with a couple 26xx's and a 4500, along with a Cat 5000. All of this equipment is connected to a 2511, which is serving as an access server. The 2511 is configured to provide reverse telnet connections into the console ports of my lab equipment. All of the 2511's asynch lines are configured the same: line 1 16 no exec modem InOut transport input all I am able to make a successful connection to all my equipment, except for one 2501. With this 2501, I get an open response when attempting the connection, but no further response to the connection. When I swap the cable connection with another piece of equipment, the problem follows the 2501, not the asych line on the 2511, leading me to believe the problem isn't the 2511 or the cable. I've telneted into the 2501 to do a show line con 0, and compared it to the console port on a working router, and I don't see any difference. The strange thing is, if I take the problem 2501 and connect the console port to my computer's com1 port using a standard blue console cable, I can connect to the port just fine! So my question is, what the difference between the 2511 2501 connection and the com1 port 2501 connection? And why does this difference only affect one router, and not the rest of the routers? Thanks Mike Dickson MCSE+Internet, MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP Dickson Network Designs voice (512)-422-3192 fax (512) 394-0320 www.dicksonnetworks.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37597t=37597 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: oc3 config [7:37587]
I personally don't have any experience with ATM, but a quick search on CCO yielded this page... hopefully you find something in here in addition to advice from other groupstudy members. Watch the wrap: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:ATM:A TM_Generals=Implementation_and_Configuration -Sean -Original Message- From: Bullock, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: oc3 config [7:37587] Guys, I have been reading on the list for sometime, and I am always in awe. Anyone out there know a quick and dirty trick to configure a point to point ATM OC3 between two cisco routers? the line is offered by verizon and I am using 2 7500 cisco routers. help. thanks! jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37596t=37587 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: after CCNA [7:37583]
With the constantly changing wireless standards and guidelines, I don't think wireless certification really makes sense right now. In fact, I'm a little shocked to hear that there is such a thing... I think it should be part of some other existing certification if anything. Just my 0.02. - Seam -Original Message- From: ashish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: after CCNA [7:37583] hi, I passed CCNA two days back... and now I am thinking of next level of certification. I am thinking of CCNP now. Meanwhile, I was also looking at the option of CWNA (Certified Wireless Network Administrator). Has anyone gone through this certification.and any insights to its recognition in the IT market. Thanks, Ashish Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37598t=37583 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: after CCNA [7:37583]
CWNA is very good certification. They also looking for Wireless Engineer at dice.com and monster.com now Sean Knox wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... With the constantly changing wireless standards and guidelines, I don't think wireless certification really makes sense right now. In fact, I'm a little shocked to hear that there is such a thing... I think it should be part of some other existing certification if anything. Just my 0.02. - Seam -Original Message- From: ashish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: after CCNA [7:37583] hi, I passed CCNA two days back... and now I am thinking of next level of certification. I am thinking of CCNP now. Meanwhile, I was also looking at the option of CWNA (Certified Wireless Network Administrator). Has anyone gone through this certification.and any insights to its recognition in the IT market. Thanks, Ashish Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37599t=37583 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444]
Its also about 15 mins away from cisco as well as the airport.. Its a good location... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ashish Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444] nopes.. there is motel 6 right on brokaw and north 1st street intersection and it is nearest to cisco san jose location. - Original Message - From: Darrell Newcomb To: Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Re: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444] Ejay, I think you mean the one in Sunnyvale on Mathilda just off 101? With a Burger King and Hobbee's right there as well. Wish I had a URL to share, but would seem like a good place to stay. Darrell Hire, Ejay wrote: There is a $50/night motel 6 with a denny's in the parking lot that is okay.I can't remember the name of the street it's on, but it's only about 2 mi. from the hq. -Ejay -Original Message- From: timothy thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444] If you test date is a long way off, or you are close by, start walking now. Remember to pack food and supplies for cold and warm weather. Also, a rain poncho may be wise. Carry or search for a cardboard box (the only approved Homeless/bum shelter approved for use within San Jose). Find a space to sleep either near the cisco compound or near a light-rail station. Transportation from Box to Cisco: Take the light-rail. USUALLY nobody will even check for a ticket. If the transit police DO check, at least you have a better place to sleep tomorrow night. Seriously, though, things are not cheap in San Jose. BUT, the do have an abundance of Starbucks Coffee Installations, where jack-booted Caffiene-Nazi's are likely to force you to consume the People's Drink. --Tim James wrote: Hello, I hope to get some advice from those who attempted the lab in San Jose. I have a lab scheduled soon and hope that someone can let me know where to stay at the best rates, travel arrangements from hotel to Cisco, etc.. any information is greatly appreciated. Thank you __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37600t=37444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2nd try - 2501 console port doesn't like reverse telnet [7:37601]
Why console itself if it ain't working Just connect it to the aux port and you will be able to get in to the router.. For some strange reason (which only the Gurus can answer) I have the same problem on my 2502...I just use the aux port :-) From: Mike Dickson Reply-To: Mike Dickson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2nd try - 2501 console port doesn't like reverse telnet [7:37597] Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 18:15:07 -0500 Gurus, I posted this question a few days ago, but didn't get anywhere. I thought I might try again with a slightly different explanation of the problem. The last explanation got me a lots of kind advice about how to setup and use a reverse telnet connection, but that's not what I need. I have 12 routers, mostly 25xx's with a couple 26xx's and a 4500, along with a Cat 5000. All of this equipment is connected to a 2511, which is serving as an access server. The 2511 is configured to provide reverse telnet connections into the console ports of my lab equipment. All of the 2511's asynch lines are configured the same: line 1 16 no exec modem InOut transport input all I am able to make a successful connection to all my equipment, except for one 2501. With this 2501, I get an open response when attempting the connection, but no further response to the connection. When I swap the cable connection with another piece of equipment, the problem follows the 2501, not the asych line on the 2511, leading me to believe the problem isn't the 2511 or the cable. I've telneted into the 2501 to do a show line con 0, and compared it to the console port on a working router, and I don't see any difference. The strange thing is, if I take the problem 2501 and connect the console port to my computer's com1 port using a standard blue console cable, I can connect to the port just fine! So my question is, what the difference between the 2511 2501 connection and the com1 port 2501 connection? And why does this difference only affect one router, and not the rest of the routers? Thanks Mike Dickson MCSE+Internet, MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP Dickson Network Designs voice (512)-422-3192 fax (512) 394-0320 www.dicksonnetworks.com _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37601t=37601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]
any confirmation on the time? i plan to take it next week. byron - Original Message - From: EMW_Tech To: Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] I'm taking the Routing Beta tomorrow. Is it really 3 hours instead of 1 hour And was it three hours? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37602t=37500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
But it helps when applying for jobs where they want a CCNA and have no clue what a CCNP is. I had a job interview today where they asked what a CCIE was. :-) Ken Michael J. Doherty 03/07/02 04:28PM Actually, if I remember the agreements correctly - you can list the lower level certs (CCxA, CCxP) with the CCIE. It is when you are a CCxP that you should not list the corresponding CCxA. Mike [snip] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37603t=37490 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP LAB QUESTION [7:37595]
You can set up the frame switch with 2 serial ports in one router. There are some frame switching commands and routing map commands that need to be done. You dont raelly need the hdlc simulator, you can use v.35 dte/dce or t/1 crossovers to use back/back T/1 connections for hdlc and ppp over T/1. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Ramsey Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP LAB QUESTION [7:37595] Hi All, I am studying to take the BSCN exam for CCNP track and I have two questions, one about building a frame-relay lab/switch and the other about serial connections. I have three routers a cisco 1605 and two cisco 1720s they each have two WIC cards with integrated cscu/dsu. the 1605 has the same type of WIC card. I know the commands to make the router, for example, the 1720 with two WIC cards, to act as a frame relay switch. can you tell me what other equipment I need to be able to actually create the FR cloud and to be able to connect the other routers with serial interfaces into it? Second question: are there any equipment out there that can simulate a serial connection such as ppp or hdlc? I appreciate any feedback. thx. Tony __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37604t=37595 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF with Riverstone.(RS3000) [7:37523]
Thank you for your feed back Peter, I also tried to add ALL the interface by using below command ospf add interface all to-area backbone And then tried to set some of the interfaces passive, individually. ospf set interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx passive but this failed, so I tried using interface name. ospf set interface InterfaceName passive. But this also gave me the same error meesage that the interface is not recognized. I tried Riverstone Homepages and tried to get more info, but with no avail. Would anybody like to share his/her knowledge? Never touched a Riverstone box before, but your summary-range certainly looks much more like type 3 summarizing rather that adding interfaces to the ospf process. At 01:27 AM 3/7/2002 -0500, you wrote: Hello everybody, I know this doesn`t have much to do with Cisco, but if anyone would like to share his/her knowledge, I would be very grateful. Has anyone worked with Riverstone RS3000 before? I have set up OSPF backbone area on RS 3000, ospf create area backbone Then I wanted all the ports to autumatically belong to the backbone area. So I tried below. ospf add summary-range xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx./xx to-area backbone Then I wanted some of the ports to be set passive so that networks that are connected to the ports and my backbone area wouldn`t exchange routing info. ospf set interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx passive I thought this would be sufficient but I got an error message saying that, the system doesn`t recognize the interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. I DID try to add individual interface to backbone area and set them passive individually then it worked. But as more network is attached to the RS3000. This will be alot of work. Does anyone have any idea? Thank you very much in advance. sean k` Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37605t=37523 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]
The beta exams are mostly slotted for 3 hours. I took the CCNA 2.0 beta a year or so back and was done in a little over an hour -Original Message- From: Byron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] any confirmation on the time? i plan to take it next week. byron - Original Message - From: EMW_Tech To: Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] I'm taking the Routing Beta tomorrow. Is it really 3 hours instead of 1 hour And was it three hours? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37606t=37500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]
Yes, all Cisco beta tests are three hours or more long. The reason is in a beta test you are asked around 150 questions whereas a production test is around 60 questions. Almost every test vendor does the same for their beta tests. You are asked more questions to validate the questions. Vendors want to develop a test that can be passed. The beta process is their means for determining which test questions will be used in the production test pool of questions. In turn, the test vendor makes the test available at a reduced cost or free in some cases. Through Complexity there is Simplicity, Through Simplicity there is Complexity David L. Blair - CCNP, CCNA, MCSE, CBE, CIW Associate, A+, 3Wizard Tarek Sabry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm taking the Routing Beta tomorrow. Is it really 3 hours instead of 1 hour or do I have wrong information??? I may have to call them in the AM but would appreciate it if someone can tell me if they know. Thanks Tarek Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37607t=37500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No go on CCIE prequal... [7:37608]
Hi all, Went for my CCIE written exam here at Networkers in Brisbane - failed by 6% :( But it showed me what to expect next time, and the areas I need work on. A few suggestions: - Somebody said a while ago the CIT is harder, but the CCIE has borader topics. I concur - the CIT was evil! - Jeff Doyle's TCP/IP books are fantastic. Read them. - Expect to fail your written or lab, and budget to try again. It shows what you need to work on (ok, every exam is different, but as far as general areas of study go). So, for now I'm going to ignore studying, finish my holiday and take things back up when I return to Perth next weekend :) Rgds, - I. -- Ian Henderson CCNA, CCNP Network Engineer, iiNet Limited Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37608t=37608 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No go on CCIE prequal... [7:37608]
Ian, Pretty sure you can get it the next time. But regarding CIT, heck, this was the easiest for my CCNP exams. Sad thing is I thought I scheduled BCRAN but the night before the exam, I realized it will be gonna be CIT so I had a few hours to browse the book and off I went hoping to get at least 300 points :) But I passed it easily. So, if you do routers/switches daily.no need to review at all. Ian Henderson wrote: Hi all, Went for my CCIE written exam here at Networkers in Brisbane - failed by 6% :( But it showed me what to expect next time, and the areas I need work on. A few suggestions: - Somebody said a while ago the CIT is harder, but the CCIE has borader topics. I concur - the CIT was evil! - Jeff Doyle's TCP/IP books are fantastic. Read them. - Expect to fail your written or lab, and budget to try again. It shows what you need to work on (ok, every exam is different, but as far as general areas of study go). So, for now I'm going to ignore studying, finish my holiday and take things back up when I return to Perth next weekend :) Rgds, - I. -- Ian Henderson CCNA, CCNP Network Engineer, iiNet Limited Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37610t=37608 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unicast flooding:question [7:37609]
I have a scenario I wanted to bounce of the group. I never really thought about this before, just wanted to confirm what Im thinking is correct. By default I think a Cisco router maintains an ARP entry for 2 hours, at which time if its not been used it ages out. In a Cisco switch however cam entries age out in a much shorter rate, I think 10 minutes. On that note can't you get unicast flooding as a result of this?? Because the cam entry for a device has disappeared and the directly attached router still has an Arp entry?? Wont packets destine for that device from another Vlan still be sent to that network and get unicast flooded??? (A switch floods a packet when it doesnt not have a cam entry for it, if the device is shut off the cam isnt going to come back) This could be fixed by a clear Arp but unless I'm missing something it seems what I stated above would happen, and could happen regularly for up to a 2 hour period ?? __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37609t=37609 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP LAB QUESTION [7:37595]
honestly, you dont even need a lab to take the CCNP. Of course, my assumption is you have experience working on Cisco products Anthony Ramsey wrote: Hi All, I am studying to take the BSCN exam for CCNP track and I have two questions, one about building a frame-relay lab/switch and the other about serial connections. I have three routers a cisco 1605 and two cisco 1720s they each have two WIC cards with integrated cscu/dsu. the 1605 has the same type of WIC card. I know the commands to make the router, for example, the 1720 with two WIC cards, to act as a frame relay switch. can you tell me what other equipment I need to be able to actually create the FR cloud and to be able to connect the other routers with serial interfaces into it? Second question: are there any equipment out there that can simulate a serial connection such as ppp or hdlc? I appreciate any feedback. thx. Tony __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37611t=37595 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2nd try - 2501 console port doesn't like reverse telnet [7:37613]
Have you tried the Modem Host command on the line with the 2501? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Dickson Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 17:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2nd try - 2501 console port doesn't like reverse telnet [7:37597] Gurus, I posted this question a few days ago, but didn't get anywhere. I thought I might try again with a slightly different explanation of the problem. The last explanation got me a lots of kind advice about how to setup and use a reverse telnet connection, but that's not what I need. I have 12 routers, mostly 25xx's with a couple 26xx's and a 4500, along with a Cat 5000. All of this equipment is connected to a 2511, which is serving as an access server. The 2511 is configured to provide reverse telnet connections into the console ports of my lab equipment. All of the 2511's asynch lines are configured the same: line 1 16 no exec modem InOut transport input all I am able to make a successful connection to all my equipment, except for one 2501. With this 2501, I get an open response when attempting the connection, but no further response to the connection. When I swap the cable connection with another piece of equipment, the problem follows the 2501, not the asych line on the 2511, leading me to believe the problem isn't the 2511 or the cable. I've telneted into the 2501 to do a show line con 0, and compared it to the console port on a working router, and I don't see any difference. The strange thing is, if I take the problem 2501 and connect the console port to my computer's com1 port using a standard blue console cable, I can connect to the port just fine! So my question is, what the difference between the 2511 2501 connection and the com1 port 2501 connection? And why does this difference only affect one router, and not the rest of the routers? Thanks Mike Dickson MCSE+Internet, MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP Dickson Network Designs voice (512)-422-3192 fax (512) 394-0320 www.dicksonnetworks.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37613t=37613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543]
Is it possible that somehow when it rebooted it came up on a older code rev?? (ie: multiple images in bootflash) I know depending on the gig mod you need a certain code rev to support it. Not sure what you get if your running code prior to that first supported rev --- Mark Odette II wrote: I've never seen anything like this myself, but... If it is not considered Production yet, why don't you just power the whole switch down, re-seat the GIG line card, and then power it back up?!? Of course, make sure you are console connected so you can watch the boot process. Aside from that, I would think that maybe you should look at your SmartNet contract and call TAC for a possible replacement (and start watching the rest of the switch for possible further power damage. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fraasch James Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cat 6505 Error Message [7:37543] I swear I get more error messages on my stuff than anyone! I must have that magic 'static' toouch or something! So here is the problem: I have a 6506 hooked up with both power supplies plugged in and everything says 'green'- everything except module 6 which is a 16 port gigabit card. It was working and I was pinging all downstream switches as of Tuesday afternoon. I noticed in Show Version that somehow the switch was rebooted on Tuesday night (I think it lost power and since it is not quite production it is not yet plugged into a UPS). Well, since the reboot, module 6 has been unable to register. I get the error message: SYS-5-MOD_NOREGISTRATION: No registration received from module 6...resetting module. Cisco website doesnt say much on the topic except that the module will be rebooted until it registers...but it never registers. So I guess the questions I have are 1) Has anyone ever seen this before, and 2) Could it be related to power problems? Thanks for any help. James [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37612t=37543 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF with Riverstone.(RS3000) [7:37523]
Do you have the ability to use this command? ospf set interface blah state disable I don't have a box that is not in production to test this on, I would be curious to see if the router still announces the network but just does not send hello's. I am also running an older version of code on this box so you may not be able to use this command. Also, why is it that you are adding all interfaces to the backbone area? Does it make sense for you to only add those interfaces you want to the backbone area and then redistribute connected networks for those interfaces you don't want hellos sent on, or are there just too many interfaces to make adding only certain ones to the backbone efficient? ~-Original Message- ~From: Sean Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ~Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:18 PM ~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~Subject: Re: OSPF with Riverstone.(RS3000) [7:37523] ~ ~ ~Thank you for your feed back Peter, ~I also tried to add ALL the interface by using below command ~ ~ospf add interface all to-area backbone ~ ~And then tried to set some of the interfaces passive, individually. ~ ~ ospf set interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx passive ~ ~but this failed, so I tried using interface name. ~ ~ospf set interface InterfaceName passive. ~ ~But this also gave me the same error meesage that the interface ~is not recognized. ~I tried Riverstone Homepages and tried to get more info, ~but with no avail. ~ ~Would anybody like to share his/her knowledge? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Never touched a Riverstone box before, but your summary-range certainly ~looks much more like type 3 summarizing rather that adding ~interfaces to ~the ospf process. ~ ~ ~At 01:27 AM 3/7/2002 -0500, you wrote: ~Hello everybody, ~ ~I know this doesn`t have much to do with Cisco, ~but if anyone would like to share his/her knowledge, ~I would be very grateful. ~Has anyone worked with Riverstone RS3000 before? ~I have set up OSPF backbone area on RS 3000, ~ ~ospf create area backbone ~ ~Then I wanted all the ports to autumatically belong to the ~backbone area. ~So I tried below. ~ ~ospf add summary-range xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx./xx to-area backbone ~ ~Then I wanted some of the ports to be set passive so that ~networks that are connected to the ports and my backbone area ~wouldn`t exchange routing info. ~ ~ospf set interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx passive ~ ~I thought this would be sufficient but I got an error message ~saying that, ~the system doesn`t recognize the interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. ~I DID try to add individual interface to backbone area and ~set them passive individually then it worked. ~But as more network is attached to the RS3000. ~This will be alot of work. ~ ~Does anyone have any idea? ~ ~Thank you very much in advance. ~ ~sean k` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Report misconduct ~and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37614t=37523 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
As you don't need to hold any Cisco certs to get your CCIE, I would assume he's still a CCNP. Anyone else know? Sean -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490] Rich, I don't think you're a CCNP any more. I think the CCIE supercedes that. Am I correct? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Richard Newman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Great job. Richard Newman, CCIE#8878, CCNP, CCDP George Zhang wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on Passing the CCIE Lab! this morning. I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax yesterday. I was told that there was another person scheduled yesterday but did not show up. My test started about 8:15 AM in the morning. We broke for lunch at about 12:20PM. By then, I only finished all the IGP stuff and felt some pressure on time. But I have already reviewed rest of the test and knew that I could go through the rest quickly. After the 15 min lunch break, I worked through rest of the test very quickly. By about 3:00 PM, I finished every thing except one small requirement that I had no clue how to do it. I decided to skip that item. Then, I started reviewing and checking my config. Along the way of reviewing/checking, I spotted and fixed a few issues. Just about the time I finished reviewing every thing, the proctor walked in and told me that it' time. I looked at the watch. It was 4:30 PM. My proctor was Steve. Steve is a great proctor. He answered quite a few of my questions and cleared my mis-understanding and confusion about the requirements of the test. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all people who helped me to achieve my goal. First, I would like to thank my wife for her support and understanding. Without her support, there is no way I could achieve my goal. Next, I will give my thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred of NetMasterClass. As I said earlier, the NMC1 class is the most important part of my final preparation. Thanks to Katie Wong of Cisco who scheduled me to access the ASET racks. Thats my primary resource for hands-on practices for the past couple of months. Thanks to Eric Fairfield for lending me a few routers when I was in Wisconsin. Also thanks to those that I've either studied with or have helped me one way or another. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as my story, I started my quest of the Cisco certifications a little over two and half years ago. I got my CCNA and CCNP in the first year. Three months later, I passed the CCIE written test. I wanted to take the lab a year ago. However, due to work and personal reasons, I did not get time to do it until now. Last year, I was too busy to do much study. At work, as a consultant, I was billing at least 40 hours/week for the whole year. At home, my second child was born in February, my wife finished school in July, and we moved to New Jersey from Wisconsin in September. In October of last year, I foresaw a window of opportunity for me to take the lab test early this year. Then, I lobbed my manager to let me go to the ECP1 class. By the time my manager approved my training request, I found that Mentor Technologies went belly up. However, I learned that Bruce and Val founded a new company called NetMasterClass, LLC (www.netmasterclass.net) and offering the NMC1 and NMC2 classes. I registered and took the NMC1 class by the end January. By the end of last year, the project I worked on finished. So since the beginning of this year I got a lot of time to study. For the past couple of months, I have studied 8-10 hours every day. As far as how I prepared, I have read most of the books (Doyle I II, Caslow, Halabi, Tam-Nam-Kee, Solie, Satterlee, etc.) recommended by people on this list. Among this long list of books, the only one I dont like is Solies book because there are too many errors in the book. There are a few topics I was more confused after reading the book. I dont have a home lab. So my primary resource for hands-on practice is remote labs such as Mentor Technologies vlabs (not available any more), Cisco ASET lab. Because I dont have a home lab, my preparation included more reading than hands-on practice. That actually worked out very well for me. Above all, the most important part of my preparation is the NMC1 class taught by Bruce, Val and Fred. IF I HAD NOT TAKEN THE NMC1 CLASS, IT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE TAKEN ME ONE OR TWO MORE ATTEMPTS BEFORE I COULD GET MY NUMBER. There are a lot of things that just cannot be learned from reading books or
RE: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
Exactly, it depends on the circumstances. On a resume, I'll list everything from CCNA to CCNP. This includes MS stuff like MCSE/MCP/etc, because some HR people are so clueless they think that just because is missing from your resume (despite work experience), you don't have a certain skill set. So I list everything I have just to be safe. In a forum such as this one, none of that is necessary. - Sean -Original Message- From: Ken Diliberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490] But it helps when applying for jobs where they want a CCNA and have no clue what a CCNP is. I had a job interview today where they asked what a CCIE was. :-) Ken Michael J. Doherty 03/07/02 04:28PM Actually, if I remember the agreements correctly - you can list the lower level certs (CCxA, CCxP) with the CCIE. It is when you are a CCxP that you should not list the corresponding CCxA. Mike [snip] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37615t=37490 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: oc3 config [7:37587]
Make sure that you ask the following from Verizon if you are configureing POS OC3 Framing - SONET OR SDH SONET is default for Cisco router Clock - Internal or line If back to back then one of your router is providing the clock WIll be great if you have an Adtect tester so that you can test the link first if it is clea or not to avoid future headache. Its really easy to configure Get the latest IOS just in case. Bullock, Jason wrote: Guys, I have been reading on the list for sometime, and I am always in awe. Anyone out there know a quick and dirty trick to configure a point to point ATM OC3 between two cisco routers? the line is offered by verizon and I am using 2 7500 cisco routers. help. thanks! jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37616t=37587 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home LAB for CCIE ??? [7:37618]
I am building my home CCIE lab. I got already 8 X 2500 series router , a 4000 router and a 2924XL catalyst switch. I am wondering whether this catalyst has everything I need to cover CAT 5000 OS.Should I need a 2926T or a CAT 5000 ?. Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37618t=37618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: oc3 config [7:37587]
Just so happens I have one in the lab I just set up between a 7507 and a 12008. As you can see there is not much to it. Set one side for clocking and rock n roll. I have no shaping defined so I have a full OC3. Dave 7507 interface ATM0/1/0 ip address 100.1.1.1 255.255.255.192 no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache atm clock INTERNAL atm sonet stm-1 atm ilmi-keepalive no atm enable-ilmi-trap pvc madgsr 1/32 encapsulation aal5snap ! 12008 interface ATM4/0 ip address 100.1.1.2 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast atm pvc 1 1 32 aal5snap no atm ilmi-keepalive no atm enable-ilmi-trap ! Bullock, Jason wrote: Guys, I have been reading on the list for sometime, and I am always in awe. Anyone out there know a quick and dirty trick to configure a point to point ATM OC3 between two cisco routers? the line is offered by verizon and I am using 2 7500 cisco routers. help. thanks! jason -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications Inc. 612-664-3367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37619t=37587 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: oc3 config [7:37587]
Here's a working config. Routers are running 11.3 and CX-AIP cards. TGE_7513# interface ATM12/0 description Location xxx_East. no ip address ! interface ATM12/0.1 multipoint description pvc to xxx_North ip address aaa.bbb.7.249 255.255.255.252 secondary ip address 10.1.19.1 255.255.255.0 atm pvc 1 0 35 aal5snap map-group TGE appletalk cable-range 10119-10119 10119.1 appletalk zone ATM ! map-list TGE ip 10.1.19.2 atm-vc 1 broadcast ip aaa.bbb.7.250 atm-vc 1 broadcast appletalk 10119.2 atm-vc 1 broadcast TGN_7507# interface ATM6/0 description Location xxx_North no ip address atm clock INTERNAL ! interface ATM6/0.1 multipoint description pvc to xxx_East ip address aaa.bbb.7.250 255.255.255.252 secondary ip address 10.1.19.2 255.255.255.0 atm pvc 1 0 35 aal5snap map-group TGN appletalk cable-range 10119-10119 10119.2 appletalk zone ATM ! map-list TGN ip 10.1.19.1 atm-vc 1 broadcast ip aaa.bbb.7.249 atm-vc 1 broadcast appletalk 10119.1 atm-vc 1 broadcast -Original Message- From: Bullock, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: oc3 config [7:37587] Guys, I have been reading on the list for sometime, and I am always in awe. Anyone out there know a quick and dirty trick to configure a point to point ATM OC3 between two cisco routers? the line is offered by verizon and I am using 2 7500 cisco routers. help. thanks! jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37620t=37587 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]
OK I just took it. Yes 3 hours. But the number of questions is horrendous! It definitely took me by surprise. I thought as I have been studying for my CCIE lab for the past year or so (on and off) then this will be a walk in the park. Was NOT! First of all I did not know that you cannot go back to questions. Definitely I would have had a different strategy. I wasn't simply prepared for that so I ended up spending too long on some questions, which I regretted later because I had a lot of very difficult questions in the beginning and a lot of easy ones in the end that I wish I could spend like 20 seconds on each instead of 3! I had 10 minutes to answer 45 questions in the end!!! I never took CCNP v2 but rumor has it that its routing exam isn't that hard. Well, maybe I'm not that competent, but today I had real tricky questions in this Beta. Well, but again the way the questions were asked was also really bad in some instances. For the first time in an exam I just had to leave some comments for some of the questions. I don't know if I'll pass or not. I think I still did OK. The lesson I learned from taking this test without preparing for it is that CCNP and CCIE are just very different ball games, and not just 2 levels of competence. You can get get away with some uncertainties as to how things really work, but in the CCNP (or at least this new version) this is much less the case. Tarek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Byron Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] any confirmation on the time? i plan to take it next week. byron - Original Message - From: EMW_Tech To: Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] I'm taking the Routing Beta tomorrow. Is it really 3 hours instead of 1 hour And was it three hours? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37621t=37500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF with Riverstone.(RS3000) [7:37523]
Thank you very much for your response Lupi, And no, I am using something called Rapid OS by Riverstone,(kind of like Cisco IOS) and it doesn`t have that command. I work for an IDC company that is starting up, and I joined a few days ago when the backbone was just completed. We are expecting 10s of customers within next couple of month, and probably more in the future. And I didn`t want to spend alot of time, adding each customer to the opsf backbone, and setting the interfaces passive, individually. So I wanted to add all the interfaces to backbone area, and set the interfaces passive individually, if needed. sean Do you have the ability to use this command? ospf set interface blah state disable I don't have a box that is not in production to test this on, I would be curious to see if the router still announces the network but just does not send hello's. I am also running an older version of code on this box so you may not be able to use this command. Also, why is it that you are adding all interfaces to the backbone area? Does it make sense for you to only add those interfaces you want to the backbone area and then redistribute connected networks for those interfaces you don't want hellos sent on, or are there just too many interfaces to make adding only certain ones to the backbone efficient? ~-Original Message- ~From: Sean Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ~Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:18 PM ~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~Subject: Re: OSPF with Riverstone.(RS3000) [7:37523] ~ ~ ~Thank you for your feed back Peter, ~I also tried to add ALL the interface by using below command ~ ~ospf add interface all to-area backbone ~ ~And then tried to set some of the interfaces passive, individually. ~ ~ ospf set interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx passive ~ ~but this failed, so I tried using interface name. ~ ~ospf set interface InterfaceName passive. ~ ~But this also gave me the same error meesage that the interface ~is not recognized. ~I tried Riverstone Homepages and tried to get more info, ~but with no avail. ~ ~Would anybody like to share his/her knowledge? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Never touched a Riverstone box before, but your summary-range certainly ~looks much more like type 3 summarizing rather that adding ~interfaces to ~the ospf process. ~ ~ ~At 01:27 AM 3/7/2002 -0500, you wrote: ~Hello everybody, ~ ~I know this doesn`t have much to do with Cisco, ~but if anyone would like to share his/her knowledge, ~I would be very grateful. ~Has anyone worked with Riverstone RS3000 before? ~I have set up OSPF backbone area on RS 3000, ~ ~ospf create area backbone ~ ~Then I wanted all the ports to autumatically belong to the ~backbone area. ~So I tried below. ~ ~ospf add summary-range xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx./xx to-area backbone ~ ~Then I wanted some of the ports to be set passive so that ~networks that are connected to the ports and my backbone area ~wouldn`t exchange routing info. ~ ~ospf set interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx passive ~ ~I thought this would be sufficient but I got an error message ~saying that, ~the system doesn`t recognize the interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. ~I DID try to add individual interface to backbone area and ~set them passive individually then it worked. ~But as more network is attached to the RS3000. ~This will be alot of work. ~ ~Does anyone have any idea? ~ ~Thank you very much in advance. ~ ~sean k` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Report misconduct ~and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37622t=37523 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab - San Jose [7:37444]
Hi, I believe there is a new major-name hotel open now down the street at the end of the Cisco campus that looked walking distance to bldg C. Forgot the name... can someone help? Since it's one of the bigger hotel names, probably a bit pricy then the cheap motels/inns in the area. When I've been, I stay at the Vagabond Inn on North 1st street by the airport which is cheap cost wise. It's a nice place. It's about a 10 min drive. Theres a few more motels/inns along north first between 101 and tazman to. The light rail train/trolley runs down north 1st and tazman also so that could be helpful if you can't swing a car, but I'd check the schedule ahead of time so you get to bldg C in plenty of time. Erick --- James wrote: Hello, I hope to get some advice from those who attempted the lab in San Jose. I have a lab scheduled soon and hope that someone can let me know where to stay at the best rates, travel arrangements from hotel to Cisco, etc.. any information is greatly appreciated. Thank you __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37623t=37444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sharing IP address - int sc0 int vlan 1 [7:37624]
Does anyone know of a possible configuration where the ip address that is assigned to a Cat5k sc0 interface can be shared with a vlan interface on the Cat5k RSM? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37624t=37624 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]
How can the routing exam for the CCNP be 3 hours long? Do you mean the CCNPv3 Foundation Beta? - Sean -Original Message- From: Tarek Sabry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 6:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] OK I just took it. Yes 3 hours. But the number of questions is horrendous! It definitely took me by surprise. I thought as I have been studying for my CCIE lab for the past year or so (on and off) then this will be a walk in the park. Was NOT! First of all I did not know that you cannot go back to questions. Definitely I would have had a different strategy. I wasn't simply prepared for that so I ended up spending too long on some questions, which I regretted later because I had a lot of very difficult questions in the beginning and a lot of easy ones in the end that I wish I could spend like 20 seconds on each instead of 3! I had 10 minutes to answer 45 questions in the end!!! I never took CCNP v2 but rumor has it that its routing exam isn't that hard. Well, maybe I'm not that competent, but today I had real tricky questions in this Beta. Well, but again the way the questions were asked was also really bad in some instances. For the first time in an exam I just had to leave some comments for some of the questions. I don't know if I'll pass or not. I think I still did OK. The lesson I learned from taking this test without preparing for it is that CCNP and CCIE are just very different ball games, and not just 2 levels of competence. You can get get away with some uncertainties as to how things really work, but in the CCNP (or at least this new version) this is much less the case. Tarek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Byron Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] any confirmation on the time? i plan to take it next week. byron - Original Message - From: EMW_Tech To: Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] I'm taking the Routing Beta tomorrow. Is it really 3 hours instead of 1 hour And was it three hours? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37625t=37500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500]
Beta. Torture! -Original Message- From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:23 PM To: 'Tarek Sabry'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] How can the routing exam for the CCNP be 3 hours long? Do you mean the CCNPv3 Foundation Beta? - Sean -Original Message- From: Tarek Sabry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 6:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] OK I just took it. Yes 3 hours. But the number of questions is horrendous! It definitely took me by surprise. I thought as I have been studying for my CCIE lab for the past year or so (on and off) then this will be a walk in the park. Was NOT! First of all I did not know that you cannot go back to questions. Definitely I would have had a different strategy. I wasn't simply prepared for that so I ended up spending too long on some questions, which I regretted later because I had a lot of very difficult questions in the beginning and a lot of easy ones in the end that I wish I could spend like 20 seconds on each instead of 3! I had 10 minutes to answer 45 questions in the end!!! I never took CCNP v2 but rumor has it that its routing exam isn't that hard. Well, maybe I'm not that competent, but today I had real tricky questions in this Beta. Well, but again the way the questions were asked was also really bad in some instances. For the first time in an exam I just had to leave some comments for some of the questions. I don't know if I'll pass or not. I think I still did OK. The lesson I learned from taking this test without preparing for it is that CCNP and CCIE are just very different ball games, and not just 2 levels of competence. You can get get away with some uncertainties as to how things really work, but in the CCNP (or at least this new version) this is much less the case. Tarek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Byron Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] any confirmation on the time? i plan to take it next week. byron - Original Message - From: EMW_Tech To: Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: Re: CCNP v3.0 [7:37500] I'm taking the Routing Beta tomorrow. Is it really 3 hours instead of 1 hour And was it three hours? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37626t=37500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Infrastructure Upgrade..... [7:37627]
Team, I am in the process of upgrading all hubs in 4 different sites, each site has 8 hubs, I will replace each site with a 2950(24 ports)10/100mbs. I will connect each switch(2,3,4) to the switch(1) on the basement where a router will be available to connect to the Frame Relay cloud. Questions: Will it make more sense to get the 1900 switch(10mbs) and not the 2950 Will I be able to set any one port to full(100mbs) on the 2950 Will I be able to set up vlans and isl (as long as my route has a fastethernet port) Is this the appropriate replacements for the hubs(we don't have a lot of money to spend) Thanks, JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37627t=37627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
possible quirk in cisco IOS [7:37628]
All, I recently uploaded a new IOS to a flash card on a cisco device and did not reboot it, I just left it up there so I could relod it al a later time. I set the boot prompt to boot from the new IOS though. For some reason a dumb ass colegue at work thinks there might be a bug in the IOS (ver 12.6) that makes the router go into stall mode when 2 IOS images reside in the IOS. I was wondering, has any one else experienced this ? Thanks Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37628t=37628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2901 switch image upgrade [7:35137]
Ass hole Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37629t=35137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sharing IP address - int sc0 int vlan 1 [7:37624]
maybe I am not interpreting this correctly...but if you do what I think you are saying you want to do, you would lose connectivity to one of the hosts...I mean...how would you be able to telnet into the switch portion to make a change if your router had the same ip? -Patrick Tim Booth 03/07/02 09:48PM Does anyone know of a possible configuration where the ip address that is assigned to a Cat5k sc0 interface can be shared with a vlan interface on the Cat5k RSM? Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37630t=37624 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Infrastructure Upgrade..... [7:37631]
Team, I am in the process of upgrading all hubs in 4 different sites, each site has 8 hubs, I will replace each site with a 2950(24 ports)10/100mbs. I will connect each switch(2,3,4) to the switch(1) on the basement where a router will be available to connect to the Frame Relay cloud. Questions: Will it make more sense to get the 1900 switch(10mbs) and not the 2950 Will I be able to set any one port to full(100mbs) on the 2950 Will I be able to set up vlans and isl (as long as my route has a fastethernet port) Is this the appropriate replacements for the hubs(we don't have a lot of money to spend) Thanks, JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37631t=37631 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Universal Dial Access Specialisation [7:37632]
Hi, Like to check has anyone taken the Cisco Universal Dial Access test? If yes, I would appreciate if you could let me know where are the reference material that I can pick up and study. Thank you have a nice weekend. With Regards Steven Quek Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37632t=37632 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Infrastructure Upgrade..... [7:37627]
Everything you are asking is freely available on Cisco's website. Check out CCO for information about the 2900s (it will tell you port capabilities, VLAN/trunking with ISL/802.1q info). As far as your question regarding the purchase of a 1900 over a 2950, this really depends on the end devices connected and how much traffic traverses your network. - Sean -Original Message- From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Infrastructure Upgrade. [7:37627] Team, I am in the process of upgrading all hubs in 4 different sites, each site has 8 hubs, I will replace each site with a 2950(24 ports)10/100mbs. I will connect each switch(2,3,4) to the switch(1) on the basement where a router will be available to connect to the Frame Relay cloud. Questions: Will it make more sense to get the 1900 switch(10mbs) and not the 2950 Will I be able to set any one port to full(100mbs) on the 2950 Will I be able to set up vlans and isl (as long as my route has a fastethernet port) Is this the appropriate replacements for the hubs(we don't have a lot of money to spend) Thanks, JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37633t=37627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Infrastructure Upgrade..... [7:37627]
Well, You did pick a pretty expensive switch to purchase...hehe the 1900's are 10mb to the desktop... You'll see some improvement over 10mb hubs on the lan but across the frame connection, it's really irrelevant. Are you looking to increase lan speed? In this day in age, I never reccommend hubs...but if you are really tight on cash flow, you would probably do better to purchase a 12 port 100mb switch and 8 100mb hubs. -Patrick Juan Blanco 03/07/02 10:27PM Team, I am in the process of upgrading all hubs in 4 different sites, each site has 8 hubs, I will replace each site with a 2950(24 ports)10/100mbs. I will connect each switch(2,3,4) to the switch(1) on the basement where a router will be available to connect to the Frame Relay cloud. Questions: Will it make more sense to get the 1900 switch(10mbs) and not the 2950 Will I be able to set any one port to full(100mbs) on the 2950 Will I be able to set up vlans and isl (as long as my route has a fastethernet port) Is this the appropriate replacements for the hubs(we don't have a lot of money to spend) Thanks, JB Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37634t=37627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: possible quirk in cisco IOS [7:37628]
did a quick search on cisco and no results for stall mode.. you may want to check www.cisco.com/tac and go to Tool Index then Bug Toolkit mike rose wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, I recently uploaded a new IOS to a flash card on a cisco device and did not reboot it, I just left it up there so I could relod it al a later time. I set the boot prompt to boot from the new IOS though. For some reason a dumb ass colegue at work thinks there might be a bug in the IOS (ver 12.6) that makes the router go into stall mode when 2 IOS images reside in the IOS. I was wondering, has any one else experienced this ? Thanks Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37635t=37628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
