RE: 3500XL - duplicate IP and Windows NT/2000 server [7:73868]
You may be able to track the MAC address to a specific manufacturer. That should narrow down the source (unless it is a softcoded MAC). Here is a link to the the ieee OUI company_id address assignments. http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt Jeremy Porter, CCNP, CCDP -Original Message- From: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3500XL - duplicate IP and Windows NT/2000 server [7:73868] The log on NT says Duplicate IP found with the mac address xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx All NT servers say the same thing with same exact mac addrss, but I cannot find the mac address at all. The log on the switches show nothing interesting. Thanks wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Searching CCO, connot find a thing. Do you have logging enabled, if yes what > do the switches say? Try a protocol sniffer(receive span a problem server > port), sometimes it is nice to see ip handle things. And learn a lot... > > What did the NT system log say? > > Tried newer IOS? (long shot) > > Martijn > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: maandag 11 augustus 2003 14:19 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: 3500XL - duplicate IP and Windows NT/2000 server [7:73868] > > > I have a bunch of 3500XL switches thruout my customer's lan. > They are having a problem with unknown mac keep appearing and disappearing > from the network. > > I can trace the mac-address of the unknown station by "show mac" from the > swtich CLI. > What's strange is that it appears at one switch, but a minute later it > appears in the different switch. > > what's even more strange is that all NT/2000 servers log shows there is an > IP conflict with this mac address. > Of course, the servers IP function stops due to this duplicate IP, but comes > back in a few minutes. > All the servers report the duplicate IP comes from the same mac address. > > Has anyone seen this problem? > > Thanks > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73920&t=73868 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: electrical issues with switches [7:72151]
I'd also like to know if Cisco puts voltage protection on the blades? While not exactly the same thing, at my last position we had hundreds of serial terminal servers (Nortel Annex) connected to dumb terminals (all over the country). We found that during bad weather, or other power related issues, the terminal server's serial connections (RJ45) acted as lightning rods. While the terminal server was on APC, the dumb terminals generally were not. When the terminals received a power surge (etc..) they would happily redistribute the jolt to the the serial port and then the terminal server, frying individual ports, blades, and sometimes the entire terminal server. 95% of the time the dumb terminals were fine once the terminal server was replaced. In 2 years we probably replaced 85 of the 350 or so deployed. Jeremy Porter, CCNP, CCDA -Original Message- From: Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: electrical issues with switches [7:72151] Related to this question: Does Cisco put any kind of voltage protection on the blades? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: electrical issues with switches [7:72151] This is completely off topic and, in my case, of an operational nature, so I need to apologize in advance. Unless there is some expressed interest please respond to me privately if you would, thanks. We have suffered over the last couple of years what I would consider an unusually high number of blade failures in various switches (from several vendors including Extreme and Cisco). They have the earmarks of an electrical problem, that is, supplied current spiking and valleying. For instance, where I am located - Northern Virginia - we had some major storms move through last night. This morning I had two blade failures in two separate closets. These closets all have UPS units (usually more than one) and the switches, all of which have dual power supplies, and are split with one power supply going to one UPS, the other to another UPS. Granted both are in the same room and usually plugged into the same circuit. Seemingly this would eliminate, or at least mitigate, the bulk of any electrical fluctuations in the closets. The UPS's have been tested with various diagnostic tools and they appear to check out fine. My question is this. The failures seem to occur more often on densely populated blades (isn't that always the case?). Many people in the building leave their PC's on at night. When the power goes out in this building, the PCs in most areas will also power down. When power is restored, even if it just flickers, all these machines will boot at the same time. Is there any chance that this surge - if there is one - of current coming from the rebooted PC NIC cards could cause these issues? Or is there even a current that flows back from the NIC's (it would seem logical, but I am not an EE). I do realize that I may be grasping at straws. Any thoughts, and again I apologize for the off topic content. There are many bright folks in this group so I thought I would ask. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72163&t=72151 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: copying flash FROM PIX? [7:70731]
try write net ? -Original Message- From: Brad Dodds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: copying flash FROM PIX? [7:70731] Going to upgrade to ver 6.3 but I wanted to save the old image to tftp server first copy flash tftp doesn't work CiscoPIX515E# sh ver Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.2(2) Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 2.1(1) CiscoPIX515E# copy flash ? Usage: copy capture: tftp:/// [pcap] copy http[s]://[:@][:]/ flash[:[image | pdm]] copy tftp[:[[//location][/pathname]]] flash[:[image | pdm]] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply or by telephone and immediately delete this message and any attachments. In the U.S. call us toll free at (800) 637-5843. Spanish, French, Quebecois French, Portuguese, Polish, German, Dutch, Turkish, Russian, Japanese and Chinese: http://www.admworld.com/confidentiality.htm. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70734&t=70731 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can't ping my own interfaces?? [7:63437]
Hello All, I'm quite perplexed, please help out if you can! My PC has two ethernet cards. One is connected to a Linksys Router, which is connected to a cable modem for internet access. The other ethernet card is plugged into a 2924XL cisco switch. 1. I can ping the cable modem and access the web - no problem. 2. I can ping an IP address on the 2924XL, no problem. 3. I can ping my PC FROM the 2924XL, no problem. PROBLEM: FROM my PC, I can't ping EITHER of my local IP addresses of the ethernet cards. One IP is 192.169.1.100/24, the other is 192.168.1.67/28. Can somebody give me a clue?! Thanks in advance! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63437&t=63437 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP WITH SNIFFER PRO [7:56442]
actually what I do with Sniffer Pro to monitor the WAN (even though I wont see layer 2 stuff which the wan sniffer will see) is I port mirror the Ethernet port where the router plugs into the lan/wan switch to an open port and plug my sniffer in there. hope this helps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:alaerte@;embratel.com.br] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HELP WITH SNIFFER PRO [7:56442] You do need a WAN hardware in the Sniffer. LM2000 is one of them, to monitor HDLC/PPP/Frame-Relay. Regards, Alaerte "Manoj Ghorpade" @groupstudy.com em 29/10/2002 08:29:48 Favor responder a "Manoj Ghorpade" Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Assunto:HELP WITH SNIFFER PRO [7:56442] Hi, I have a copy of sniffer pro 4.5 and want to use it to monitor the WAN links. I don't have any WAN hardware for sniffer. Can anyone guide me on how to make the best use of it for monitoring WAN traffic ? Regards Manoj Ghorpade. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56448&t=56442 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT:Paging Rob Hugo.. [7:51014]
please email me off the list. i lost your email thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51014&t=51014 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cabletron vs Cisco Switches [7:49812]
One of my resellers told me he could get me a 2950-24 for a little over $900. i know the vh's with maintenance run us about $1100. thanks again for the input -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Reed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/27/02 12:18 PM Subject: RE: Cabletron vs Cisco Switches [7:49812] If you are swaying toward Cisco for any other reason, you can probably purchase the 2950-24's (without uplinks) as cheap as the VH2402SM and start working on your Cisco switching skill sets. I don't like the VH's very much either, but they are cheap. To make them run reasonably well, make sure you have the 2.05.00 firmware. In the Bridge Extension under VLAN learning, make sure you are running in IVL mode. SVL is evil and causes unpredictable results. Changing from SVL to IVL requires a reboot. Also make sure you enable IGMP on your VH's 2200's and 6000 to ensure the multicast traffic isn't broadcast everywhere. This setting is off by default on all your Cabletron products. Once you get all that set, they should behave pretty well. I've seen some weird spanning tree problems in poorly designed networks, but that may be getting better with the latest firmware. If you're looking for some good, inexpensive switches, check out the HP Procurves. I've had good results with them and they are a little less than the VH's. Good Luck!! Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:09 PM To: 'Jeffrey Reed '; Wright, Jeremy; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Subject: RE: Cabletron vs Cisco Switches [7:49812] I appreciate the response. Basicallly we buy the vh2402 for workgroup access layer connections. we use no stacking (i heard if you stack 7 vh2402's it takes 18 minutes to boot up..geeze!) or fiber/gig uplinks. we usually have the 2402's uplinked (over copper) to a 2h252 thats linked to our 6000 core. i wanted to get a feel for if im only needing access ports with no gig/fiber modules, would the 2950 be a better fit. i think it is based on some of the specs ive read and the experience ive had with the 2402's. i also heard that enterasys is looking at purchasing a different brand of 24-48 port work groups switches because the 2402's suck and havent had much luck. i personally hate them and would prefer to use cisco. thanks again for your input. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Reed To: Wright, Jeremy; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/26/02 8:54 PM Subject: RE: Cabletron vs Cisco Switches [7:49812] I think they are not in the same class of switches, so a direct comparison is tough. Here's some thoughts... - The 2950 is newer, therefore newer ASICs. The VH-2402, aka ELS100 has been around for about three years. -The VH is mostly ASIC based where the firmware is only 500k in size. The 2950's firmware image is over 4M. With a larger firmware base, I have to believe the 2950 will have the ability to change more drastically over time. I think the VH could be very close to end of life. - The 2950 is not very flexible when it comes to HW versions. If you want cheap, the lower cost model has 24 10/100 ports and no uplink or stacking capability. If you want 100M fiber, you have to buy the 2950C which has no GIG or stacking. If you want stacking, you have to move to the 2950G which has a list of twice the one without the GBICs. On the VH's, you have one common piece of HW and you purchase the uplinks, stacks etc. as you need them. - I think Cisco designed the 2950 internally while the VH was designed in Taiwan, not internally at Cabletron. Check out the Tiger Switches from SMC and you'll see very familiar HW at lower prices. If you have specific questions, let me know. I've sold hundreds of the VH's and a few dozen of the 2950's. Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wright, Jeremy Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 3:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cabletron vs Cisco Switches [7:49812] We are primarily a Cabletron shop. We have a lot of vh2402's and I wanted to see if there was someone on the list that had both the vh2402's and the catalyst 2950-24's. I've read the specs on both of them but I wanted to hear the real world comparison. TIA. Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49904&t=49812 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cabletron vs Cisco Switches [7:49812]
I appreciate the response. Basicallly we buy the vh2402 for workgroup access layer connections. we use no stacking (i heard if you stack 7 vh2402's it takes 18 minutes to boot up..geeze!) or fiber/gig uplinks. we usually have the 2402's uplinked (over copper) to a 2h252 thats linked to our 6000 core. i wanted to get a feel for if im only needing access ports with no gig/fiber modules, would the 2950 be a better fit. i think it is based on some of the specs ive read and the experience ive had with the 2402's. i also heard that enterasys is looking at purchasing a different brand of 24-48 port work groups switches because the 2402's suck and havent had much luck. i personally hate them and would prefer to use cisco. thanks again for your input. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Reed To: Wright, Jeremy; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/26/02 8:54 PM Subject: RE: Cabletron vs Cisco Switches [7:49812] I think they are not in the same class of switches, so a direct comparison is tough. Here's some thoughts... - The 2950 is newer, therefore newer ASICs. The VH-2402, aka ELS100 has been around for about three years. -The VH is mostly ASIC based where the firmware is only 500k in size. The 2950's firmware image is over 4M. With a larger firmware base, I have to believe the 2950 will have the ability to change more drastically over time. I think the VH could be very close to end of life. - The 2950 is not very flexible when it comes to HW versions. If you want cheap, the lower cost model has 24 10/100 ports and no uplink or stacking capability. If you want 100M fiber, you have to buy the 2950C which has no GIG or stacking. If you want stacking, you have to move to the 2950G which has a list of twice the one without the GBICs. On the VH's, you have one common piece of HW and you purchase the uplinks, stacks etc. as you need them. - I think Cisco designed the 2950 internally while the VH was designed in Taiwan, not internally at Cabletron. Check out the Tiger Switches from SMC and you'll see very familiar HW at lower prices. If you have specific questions, let me know. I've sold hundreds of the VH's and a few dozen of the 2950's. Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wright, Jeremy Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 3:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cabletron vs Cisco Switches [7:49812] We are primarily a Cabletron shop. We have a lot of vh2402's and I wanted to see if there was someone on the list that had both the vh2402's and the catalyst 2950-24's. I've read the specs on both of them but I wanted to hear the real world comparison. TIA. Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49854&t=49812 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cabletron vs Cisco Switches [7:49812]
We are primarily a Cabletron shop. We have a lot of vh2402's and I wanted to see if there was someone on the list that had both the vh2402's and the catalyst 2950-24's. I've read the specs on both of them but I wanted to hear the real world comparison. TIA. **** Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49812&t=49812 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Teaming network cards causes flapping [7:49254]
the teaming we have does not share the mac address. it shares the ip and you can see the mac address has 1 different character then the other. -Original Message- From: E Joseph To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/23/02 5:00 PM Subject: Re: Teaming network cards causes flapping [7:49254] I have seen a similar error when we had 2 pcs on the same switch with the same mac address. (it was a strange driver issue that caused pc's with that driver to have the same, incorrect mac address) I don't understand teaming, I would guess teaming has to come up with a "shared" mac address to work. The switch may see that address moving back and forth between teamed ports?? Maybe someone else can clarify.. Ed --- Gary Crouch wrote: > When I team our Intel NICs one of the ports on our > cat 3500xl shows > addr_flapp about once every minuet > is they any thing you need to do to support teaming? > > no errors in non teamed mode. > > Thanks > > Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49495&t=49254 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121]
I used 3 and it was a great resource to helping me pass. -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] Folks, is it only me or the Boson Tests #1 and #2 for CCIE Writen are just crap comparing to #3? I am considering to buy one of these but I am not sure wich one... Is #3 really the most close it can get to the real deal? Rgds, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49129&t=49121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055]
Please reference Doyle Episode 1 bottom of pg 485 and you will see how bandwidth and costs relate. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bandwidth command!! [7:44055] >>> "W. Alan Robertson" 5/13/02 1:06:25 PM >>> >Rajesh, > >Correct... The bandwidth statement has no impact on other routing >protocols, like OSPF. OSPF looks at the "cost" of a link in >determining best path. There's no direct correllation between >"bandwidth" and "cost." There isn't? How does OSPF determine the cost of a link? Regards, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44097&t=44055 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Let the flamin' begin....dumbass beginner question [7:43763]
did you try putting on the clock rate on the dce end of the cable. to tell what end you have, do a show controllers s on the interface you are using. dont trust what the cable says physically on it. -Original Message- From: mark To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5/9/02 12:18 PM Subject: Let the flamin' begindumbass beginner question [7:43759] I originally configured and maintain several Cisco routers at work so I'm not a TOTAL dumbass when it comes to routers but I sure do feel like one about now. I have a couple of 2500's and a 2600 router with a couple of back to back cables. I'm not doing something correctly to allow the units to talk to each other using those cables. I can telnet into each router or connect via console connection and all are working. The green lights come on the serial connections when the b to b cables are plugged in but I can't for the life of me get them to talk to each other. Can't ping from one serial port on subnet A thru the b-to-b cable to the serial port on the other router on the same subnet on any of the routers. I have checked and rechecked ip info on all. I have tried frame-relay and PPP (which I would NOT trust my configuraion of but I do know frame OK - or at least I thought I did). I have RIP and EIGRP enabled on all and have them redistributing. I have tried the DCE and the DTE at each end. This is what maybe the particularly dumbass question - Do I need to set a clock rate or data rate for a frame connection using these cables? If so the commands required would be helpful. I can look at the options available. I just need to know where to start with them. If it's not a clock rate issue, have I given enough info for anyone to give me an educated guess as to what I'm doing wrong? If not, what other info can I provide? Muchas gracias. Mark "Gump" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43763&t=43763 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst 3920 [7:42690]
Does anyone know a cheap rack that has a 3920 in it? I just want to fiddle with the vlan config, telnet and ping. Ideas?!? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42690&t=42690 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Virtual-links [7:42565]
Thanks for the reply! Good point about the router ID. After the first response, I began playing with the OSPF "router-id" command, and subsequently discovered that the virtual-link must be defined as terminating at the router-id, and not the physical interface or in any specific area. As far as joining discontiguous nonzero areas, I would be interested to see the configs... -Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF Virtual-links [7:42565] In the world of OSPF, the virtual link end points are the router RID's This is defined in the RFC. with virtual links, the hello packet has the V bit set to 1. I believe that the TTL of the IP packet transporting the VL hello is set to 255. In any case, virtual link hellos are forwarded until such time as they reach a router who meets the VL end point requirement or until they reach the end of the area over which the virtual link is to travel. I presume that virtual link packets do not wander aimlessly through an OSPF domain, but stop at the border of the defined transit area. So, in answer to your question, no, the termination point of the virtual link does not have to be an interface in area 0. in fact, virtual links can be used to join discontiguous non zero areas. There is an example of this in Terry Slattery's book Advanced IP Routing in Cisco Networks. HTH ""Jeremy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > My question is regarding OSPF and virtual links. As you can see, I have > created an area 23 between R2 and R3 such that R3 will need a virtual link > defined in order to have a connection to Area 0. My question is, does R3 > have to peer with an interface in R2 that is a member of area 0? I have > noticed that if I put R2's loopback interface (which R3 is peering to) in > area 23, it fails, whereas, if I move the interface to area 0, the virtual > link comes up. Please take a look at the crude diagram below, or the > attached visio for clarification. Please let me know your thoughts on this. > Thanks again for all of your informed help (and I apologize if this appears > to be a less-than-CCIE-caliber question). > > Topology map (excuse the crude map, if you have visio, check out the > enclosed diagram: > R5---R1 > / \ > /\ >R4R2--R3 > > Router2: > router ospf 10 > area 23 virtual-link 130.10.23.3 > network 130.10.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Loopback Interface) > network 130.10.23.2 0.0.0.0 area 23 (Link to R3 Serial Interface (S1)) > network 130.10.245.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Link to R5 Frame-Relay Interface (S0) > [DR=R5]) > > Router3: > router ospf 10 > area 23 virtual-link 130.10.2.2 (Virtual link peering to Loopback on R2 (in > area 0, does it have to be?) > network 130.10.23.3 0.0.0.0 area 23 (link to R3 Serial Interface (S0)) > > Router4: > router ospf 10 > network 130.10.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 4 (Loopback Interface) > network 130.10.245.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Link to R5 Frame-Relay Interface (S0) > [DR=R5]) > > Router5: > router ospf 10 > network 130.10.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 5 > network 130.10.245.5 0.0.0.0 area 0 > neighbor 130.10.245.2 > neighbor 130.10.245.4 > > > BTW, anyone else taking the exam on April 30th? I am...heheh... > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/vnd] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42657&t=42565 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why does IOS only allow ICMP granularity on "destination" [7:42656]
I think it relates to the fact that ICMP uses TYPES rather than PORTS. Though it still uses source and destination IP address, ports are not used, so the whole source port thing doesn't really make sense with ICMP. There really is no "source type", so they don't have granularity on the source address. Make Sense? Or did I muddy the waters further? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Why does IOS only allow ICMP granularity on "destination" [7:42618] On Sep 15, 12:40pm, "Gaz" wrote: } } I don't think you will see the source as echo reply. By that, I mean that } the echo reply will only be evident in the destination. The source could be } any port. ICMP does not have "port"s; therefore, this statement is non-sensical. } Remember ICMP is the odd protocol, which has to be allowed both ways through } a firewall, because the reply is a totally separate session. ICMP is a connectionless protocol; therefore, there is nu such thing as a "session". } If you telnet from A to B. The destination port is 23. In the reply from B } to A 'source' port is 23. Telnet uses TCP. There is no comparison. } If you use ping though for example, from A to B. The destination will be } echo. In the reply from B to A, the source will not be 'echo' it could be } anything. The important part will be the destination port which is } 'echo-reply'. ICMP does not have "port"s. It has "type"s and "code". Echo is type 8 and Echo Reply is type 0. Neither one uses codes, so the code is 0. The only information as to the source of an ICMP message is the IP address. As I said to the other guy, go read RFC 792 (especially before answering any more questions about it). } Hope I haven't confused. Hope even more that I haven't errored. You have errored. Go read the RFC, it is a simple one and will get you into the habit of going to the source when conducting your research. }-- End of excerpt from "Gaz" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42656&t=42656 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Virtual-links [7:42565]
My question is regarding OSPF and virtual links. As you can see, I have created an area 23 between R2 and R3 such that R3 will need a virtual link defined in order to have a connection to Area 0. My question is, does R3 have to peer with an interface in R2 that is a member of area 0? I have noticed that if I put R2's loopback interface (which R3 is peering to) in area 23, it fails, whereas, if I move the interface to area 0, the virtual link comes up. Please take a look at the crude diagram below, or the attached visio for clarification. Please let me know your thoughts on this. Thanks again for all of your informed help (and I apologize if this appears to be a less-than-CCIE-caliber question). Topology map (excuse the crude map, if you have visio, check out the enclosed diagram: R5---R1 / \ / \ R4R2--R3 Router2: router ospf 10 area 23 virtual-link 130.10.23.3 network 130.10.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Loopback Interface) network 130.10.23.2 0.0.0.0 area 23 (Link to R3 Serial Interface (S1)) network 130.10.245.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Link to R5 Frame-Relay Interface (S0) [DR=R5]) Router3: router ospf 10 area 23 virtual-link 130.10.2.2 (Virtual link peering to Loopback on R2 (in area 0, does it have to be?) network 130.10.23.3 0.0.0.0 area 23 (link to R3 Serial Interface (S0)) Router4: router ospf 10 network 130.10.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 4 (Loopback Interface) network 130.10.245.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 (Link to R5 Frame-Relay Interface (S0) [DR=R5]) Router5: router ospf 10 network 130.10.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 5 network 130.10.245.5 0.0.0.0 area 0 neighbor 130.10.245.2 neighbor 130.10.245.4 BTW, anyone else taking the exam on April 30th? I am...heheh... [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/vnd] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42565&t=42565 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 7507 subinterface [7:42533]
thanks everyone for the help. -Original Message- From: Abidin Kahraman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:16 AM To: Wright, Jeremy; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: 7507 subinterface Reload it. Abidin. -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:48 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: 7507 subinterface i have a 7507 that i created a subinterface on (int fa4/0/0.1) and I no longer need it. I did a no int fa4/0/0.1 and it took it ok. It does not show up in the show run but when I do a sh ip int brief it shows up but as deleted. Even though it is not in use or affecting anything, will it still always show up in sh ip int brief? Is there a way to get it out of the sh ip int brief? **** Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. *** Bu e-posta mesaji ve ekleri sadece gonderildigi kisi veya kuruma ozeldir. Eger dogru kisiye ulasmadigini dusunuyorsaniz, bu mesajin gizlenmesi, yonlendirilmesi, kopyalanmasi veya herhangi bir sekilde kullanilmasi yasaktir. Mesaj iceriginde bulunan fikir ve yorumlar, Superonline'a degil sadece gondericiye aittir. Bu mesaj bilinen tum viruslere karsi test edilmistir. *** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, forwarding, copying or use of any of the information is prohibited. The opinions expressed in this message belong to sender alone. There is no implied endorsement by SUPERONLINE. This e-mail has been scanned for all known computer viruses. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42533&t=42533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over ISDN demand circuit [7:42348]
Why not just deny the OSPF traffic in the dialer list, thereby declaring it uninteresting to bring up the link, but okay to pass over the link once the call has been established. Or, how about the no peer neighbor-route statement?Thoughts? >From CCO: Under the BRI interface that is running demand circuit, configure no peer neighbor-route. This prevents the /32 mask from being installed. You can use the configuration shown below on Router 1 only, but we recommend configuring this command on both sides for consistency. R1#configure terminal R1(config)#interface BRI1/1 R1(config-if)#no peer neighbor-route -Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erick B. Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OSPF over ISDN demand circuit [7:42348] Hi, Having passive for the ISDN int would stop OSPF multicast hellos from going across the ISDN interface. You could still do a neighbor statement though which is unicast however. If the ISDN is bouncing, it's probably due to a route-redistribution problem or some form of IP traffic going out the ISDN interface. Do you have other routing protocols sending updates out ISDN (use passive interface for those routing protocols). Check your redistribution, do you have filters to not allow the ISDN/dialer interface IP subnet to be redistributed into OSPF again? To see whats triggering the ISDN/dialer int do: show dialer (should have a reason) debug interface bri/dialer debug ip pack (see note below) Debug ip pack generates a lot of output and might/will crash the router so be careful with it. If you use the debug interface (interface) condition then the debug output will only show traffic in/out of the interface specified which will narrow down the output. --- timothy thielen wrote: > If one wishes for routing updates to bring up the > link, can one not just use > the "passive-interface" command on the ISDN > interface? > > If it is a backup link, passive interface will > keep routing updates will > keep the link from coming up for updates. Then a > couple of floating static > routes on either end should bring it up if the > primary (dynamic)link goes > down as long as the administrative distance for the > floaters are greater > then that of OSPF. > > --Tim > > Ruihai An wrote: > > > > Hi, Group, > > > > On an ISDN circuit running ospf , if I want to use > "ip ospf > > demand-circuit" > > to keep it from being brought up by ospf update, > do I need to > > define > > 224.0.0.5 as non-interesting traffic in > dialer-list? > > > > I have configured "ip ospf demand-circuit" on one > side of the > > ISDN, but > > routing update to 224.0.0.5 keeps activating the > circuit? What > > is the > > problem? > > > > Thanks > > > > Ruihai [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42532&t=42348 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 7507 subinterface [7:42525]
thats what i thought..but of course its a production router and i wont be
able to reboot it anytime soon. thanks for the help.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7507 subinterface [7:42525]
a reboot clear this
this happens quite a bit with various sub interfaces and dlci's not used on
a frame circuit.
-Patrick
>>> "Wright, Jeremy" 04/25/02 08:47AM >>>
i have a 7507 that i created a subinterface on (int fa4/0/0.1) and I no
longer need it. I did a no int fa4/0/0.1 and it took it ok. It does not show
up in the show run but when I do a sh ip int brief it shows up but as
deleted. Even though it is not in use or affecting anything, will it still
always show up in sh ip int brief? Is there a way to get it out of the sh ip
int brief?
********
Jeremy Wright
Network Analyst
Archer Daniels Midland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(217)451-4063
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Confidentiality Disclaimer <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42531&t=42525
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7507 subinterface [7:42525]
i have a 7507 that i created a subinterface on (int fa4/0/0.1) and I no longer need it. I did a no int fa4/0/0.1 and it took it ok. It does not show up in the show run but when I do a sh ip int brief it shows up but as deleted. Even though it is not in use or affecting anything, will it still always show up in sh ip int brief? Is there a way to get it out of the sh ip int brief? Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42525&t=42525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT: Enterasys Switching [7:42216]
I have taken all of the Enterasys Certification tests and passed them all. Global Knowledge has some great classes for them. Here is the order I wouls suggest taking them. Wireless, switching, routing, and then element manager. there is no particular order to take them but element manager is a pretty tough test. i do not work for enterasys and only took them as a work requirement. -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:30 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Way OT: Enterasys Switching Sorry for posting about other vendors but I have to take a certification test for my company and I was wondering if anyone has taken the Enterasys ES Switching ceritifcation and the roamabout wireless certification test? If so, any help on what it may be like as I'm unable to find any information about it. Thanks! Tim _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42216&t=42216 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spanning Tree in a Cisco / Cabltron (Enterasys [7:41946]
i have seen this before with a similar environment but the device that was causing this was an old bay box that was generating TCN BPDU's causing respans. you might want to fire up a sniffer and filter on BPDU. as far as the root switch, i would nail down the priority on all of the switches. be aware of what the default priorities are on both the cisco and enterasys devices. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spanning Tree in a Cisco / Cabltron (Enterasys) environment [7:41944] We have a mixed environment of Enterasys E7, Cabletron 6000, Cabletron MMACs and a Cisco 2948. They are all running IEEE spanning tree. The Switches report that the Spanning tree topology keeps changing. Example, according to the Cisco 2948 its changed 9 times in under 24 hours (since I've put it in). I'm not sure what could be causing this or if this even something to be concerned about. Another thing that's got me is that I can't find the MAC address of the spanning tree root switch. I've looked at all the switched, but cannot seem to find it. Any Help appreciated. Thanks, Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41946&t=41946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41324]
wait a second. i hold that job position :) -Original Message- From: Kelly Cobean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41318] Haaa.Can I re-write the job post...Pllaasss Client is seeking a highly seasoned CCIE with 5+ years of ISP/Large Enterprise experience who has done years of project management and can tie a neck-tie. Candidate must be currently un-employed, have no plans of becoming employed in the next year, and must be willing to work for %50 of his market worth. Candidate should enjoy getting jerked around at a moments notice and despise the thought of reward for work well done. Heck yeah...Sign me up (And maybe afterwards, you can take turns stabbing me in the eye with a kabob skewer!) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mlh Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41253] Do you really think you can find a CCIE who is designed for your strict requirement? I don't think so. - Original Message - From: "Jeff Glaser" To: Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:10 PM Subject: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [3:4413] > Following is a new request that is very thin re details for competitive > reasons, but really hot. > > The client is seeking a PT (approximately 1 week a month) CCIE or near CCIE > who has worked extensively with CISCO 7000, CISCO 12000 and GSR in a > variety of situations and for multiple clients, who can be available and > travel one week a month, conduct assessments, write recommendations, etc. > The client will use this consultant, if they meet the criteria and satisfy > the end clients, about 6-12 times over the next 12 months. Therefore > communication skills, consulting skills, maturity, etc. mean something. > PLEASE understand that this is part-time, on an as-needed basis. It could > lead to full time--but given this market, that is a wish rather than a > guarantee. > > THIS IS NOT an entry level position AND IT IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR INDEPENDENT > CONSULTANTS (1099 or CORP-CORP) who are either US Citizens, Green Card > Holders or TN VISA holders. No agencies or third party > > RATE IS CRITICAL--If yu think you can bill yourself at BIG 4( sorry > Andersen) rates, then please save us both a lot of trouble.and don't send in > the reusme. > > > Send resume, contact information and billing rate (travel will be billed > separately) to me ASAP. > > Thanks. > > Jeff > > > Sincerely, > > Jeffrey Glaser > NewGen Technologies, Inc. > 703-729-3382 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41324&t=41324 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
static route description again [7:41328]
i figured it out with the help of my friend Mr. Rthugo. the description of static routes is ios specific. below is a snapshot of using ios 11.2 (you cant do it) and one with 12.1(you can do it). 12.1 router: R4(config)#ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.2 ? Distance metric for this route name Specify name of the next hop permanent permanent route tagSet tag for this route 11.2 router: router(config)#ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.2 ? Distance metric for this route permanent permanent route tagSet tag for this route Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41328&t=41328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
static route description [7:41317]
i know this has come up before, and i even think i answered it but i cant find it in the archives. how do you put a description on a static route? Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41317&t=41317 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
please insert foot into mouth now. im doing too much telnetting at once..if that is even a word :) -Original Message- From: Johnny Routing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Disable Telnet [7:41293] Surely you were joking ""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > do a no login on line vty 0 4 ie: > > conf t > line vty 0 4 > no login > > -Original Message- > From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293] > > > Hi All, > > How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want > console access. > > > Thanks, > > > Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41308&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
youre correct. i was answering too quick without thinking about it more. ive done it so many times but i havent had any caffeine this morning so i only process about half of my thoughts -Original Message- From: Dimitris Vassilopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] Jeremy, If you enter "no login" under vty 0 4, then you'll get into the router! "login" means that the router prompts " Password:". "no login" instructs the router to bypass that, giving you access immediately. Dvass Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41307&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE lab test schedule [7:41300]
its booked full. you have to schedule way in advance. you can watch for people dropping lab dates on this list though -Original Message- From: Ruihai An [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE lab test schedule [7:41300] Does anyone know why there is no available lab test between June and September? Will the lab be closed for three months? Ruihai Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41302&t=41300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
do a no login on line vty 0 4 ie: conf t line vty 0 4 no login -Original Message- From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293] Hi All, How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want console access. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41297&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
that was a key part. but nli's book is great. hint hint..get that! -Original Message- From: Nguyen, Cuong Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:41 AM To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] I aggreed with Jeremy. I read the same material. To pass the test, you just need the ccie exam cram and Boson test # 3. C.Q.Nguyen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wright, Jeremy Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] a must is caslows br&s for ccie's second edition. halabi, doyle version2, nli's written book, and exam cram is what i used to pass the written the 1st time. boson 3 is a great resource also. i have a brand new exam cram ccie routing and switching book that has never been opened im selling. email me off the list if you are interested. -Original Message- From: Kris Keen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] Hi All, I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. Please help... Thanks! Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41038&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
a must is caslows br&s for ccie's second edition. halabi, doyle version2, nli's written book, and exam cram is what i used to pass the written the 1st time. boson 3 is a great resource also. i have a brand new exam cram ccie routing and switching book that has never been opened im selling. email me off the list if you are interested. -Original Message- From: Kris Keen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] Hi All, I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the process of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more advantgeous? I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. Please help... Thanks! Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41021&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Audio Files [7:40911]
does anyone have the routing and switching bundle from this site. i was thinking of buying it but i wanted to get the groups opinion first. -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco Audio Files [7:40911] Sure, go here http://recording.safeshopper.com/ I am thinking of getting the security ones. I have some of the other ones. They send them to you on MP3s. Each lesson takes about 2 CDs. -Original Message- From: Sam Deckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Audio Files [7:40911] Hello all, Just wondering if anyone has (or knows where to get) Cisco audio files, such as from sessions at Networkers? I would like to be able to listen to them in the car Thanks for any help anyone is able to provide... Sam. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40920&t=40911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: CCIE Exam Cram Book [7:39834]
I have an Exam Cram Routing and Switching book that has never been opened. This book was sent to me by mistake along with another book. I was just curious if any of my fellow teammates would like to purchase it before I put it on EBAY. Please contact me off of the list if you are interested. Back to my OSPF nightmare now. Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39834&t=39834 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
i heard a saying one time that the only good things that came out of berkley was Free BSD and LSD ;) no offense to alumni -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657] I used to work with a guy who loved to call University of Berkely the "University of Bezerkly." -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > No, you Bostonians aren't that bad. I'll be there in June for my hubby's > MIT reunion. Should be interesting. > > I don't know the history of UDP. It sounds like it could have come from > Berkeley or Santa Cruz or Eugene or some such pinko, commie, anarchist > place! ;-) > > Priscilla > > At 03:41 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote: > >""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > The history of TCP/IP is somewhat muddy, as you can imagine. > > > > > > At 02:04 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote: > > > >I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was > > > >written by the Depertment of Defense. > > > > > > I agree that you should question that. > > > > > > > I am confident that ARPAnet was > > > >commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN > > > > > > Yes, you could say that. The Information Processing Techniques Office > > > (IPTO) of ARPA awarded the contract to build the Interface Message > > > Processors (IMP) for ARPANET to BBN in late 1968. IMPs were the early > > > routers. BBN built the IMPs with the help (or hindrance if you believe > >some > > > reports) of Honeywell. Honeywell developed and manufactured the hardware. > > > BBN did the software. > > > > > > Descriptions of the "network layer" software that ran on these IMPs > >doesn't > > > sound much like IP at all. It was connection-oriented, for one thing, and > > > handled error correction. It was very East-Coast anal-retentive stuff. > ;-) > > > > > >Us Bostonians aren't that bad, are we? > > > > > > > > The software that evolved into TCP/IP was a West-Coast hippy-dippy geeky > > > phenomenon. > > > >Is UDP a west-coast thing? > > > >UCLA, SRI, UC Santa Barbara, USC, and University of Utah > > > graduate students and researchers worked on it. Originally they had to > >make > > > sure their software interoperated with the IMPs of the ARPANET. They > > > developed a protocol called the Network Control Protocol (NCP) that > worked > > > on the end devices that communicated with the IMPs. It was a host-to-host > > > protocol that could be considered a predecessor to TCP. > > > > > > NCP worked only with ARPANET. By 1973 or so, ARPANET wasn't the only game > > > in town though. There was packet radio (which evolved into Ethernet), > > > SATNET, and others. A more general-purpose protocol was needed. Vint Cerf > > > who was with UCLA at the time and Bob Kahn, who had been at BBN but now > > > worked for ARPA directly, worked on a new protocol called Transmission > > > Control Protocol (TCP) that was general-purpose. They made the assumption > > > that the underlying network was unreliable. The new protocol shifted the > > > job of reliability from the network to the destination hosts. > > > > > > Originally TCP handled the routing of packets also. TCP had jobs that we > > > would today assign to the network and transport layers. > > > > > > And finally, in 1978, we come to the birth of the Internet Protocol (IP). > > > In 1978, the job of routing packets was broken away from TCP. TCP was > >given > > > the task of breaking messages into packets, reassembling them at the > other > > > end, detecting errors, resending anything lost, and putting packets in > the > > > right order. IP was simply responsible for forwarding individual packets. > > > The specifications for how this should work were written by Cerf at UCLA, > > > and Postel and Cohen from the University of Southern California's > > > Information Sciences Institute (ISI). > > > > > > In the early 1980s, the ARPANET got really congested and the National > > > Science Foundation created its own network for the academic computer > > > science community. It used TCP/IP and is sometimes considered the real > > > forerunner of "the Internet," although it probably could never have > > > happened without the work that went into the ARPANET. ARPANET converted > to > > > TCP/IP in 1983. It also divided into MILNET and ARPANET. It had > > > connectivity with all the other networks by then. Later it got > > > decommissioned. By 1989, it was gone, but its legacy lived on. May it > RIP. > > > ;-) > > > > > > Here's a recommendation for a terrific book about the history of the > > > Internet: > > > > > > "Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet" by Katie Hafner > > > and Matthew Lyon. > > > >I'll definitely read that book, as I love that kind of stuff. > > > > > > > >
RE: Blocking OSPF LSA [7:39191]
would writing an access list to block 224.0.0.5 and .6 do the trick? -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Blocking OSPF LSA [7:39191] You could use 'passive-interface' in the ospf config or you could choose not to include a network statement that includes that interface. If you need to advertise that prefix, a possibility might be to redistribute connected. Of course, it all depends on what you're really trying to accomplish. HTH, John >>> "Larry Whitfill" 3/22/02 11:28:35 AM >>> I know how to reduce the number of LSA's being injected into an area by an ABR by using the stub, no-summary command. However, area 3 LSA's are still sent into the area (default route LSA). I know I cab stop them with "database filter," but does anyone know of another way to block all LSA's? Thanks, Larry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39209&t=39191 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VTP Servers [7:39083]
show vtp domain or show vtp status ..i think -Original Message- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VTP Servers [7:39083] Hello, The switches use the VTP database with the highest config-revision. IE: You can be playing with a switch not attached to the network and then attach it to the network and if it's config-revision is higher it will wipe out the other switches. Changing the VTP domain makes the config-revision 0 again. So it is important to make sure the config-revision is 0 before you plug it into a live network if you don't want this switch to overwrite your VLAN databases. I don't recall offhand the 'show vtp ...' command that shows you what the current config-revision value is but it is there. Also, be aware that a VTP CLIENT can send out VTP updates and wipe out your VLAN database config. IE: A quick-fix is not to change from Server to client mode. HTH, Erick --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: > If I have an existing VTP domain server with many > VLANs configured and then > add another VTP server does the first server update > the new server? No > chance of the new server updating the old server and > wiping out the VTP > database, right? > > Thanks!! > > Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards. http://movies.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39088&t=39083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Coyotepoint Load Balancers [7:38953]
havent used it. we just installed F5 load balancing and it doesnt work. we havent had any problems with our local director but it is not going to be supported any more. -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Coyotepoint Load Balancers [7:38953] I hope this is not too far off topic, but has anyone ever used this companies load balancers or products or have any feedback on it. http://www.coyotepoint.com One thing I noticed is that it only has 1 port in, and one out. Is that not normal? I have used Alteon Before, any feedback would be helpful. Thanks in Advance. Brian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38963&t=38953 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Who is Priscilla Oppenheimer ? [7:38662]
As Jerry Seinfeld once said "look to the cookie" -Original Message- From: Mark Odette II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Who is Priscilla Oppenheimer ? [7:38662] Padding Here for your protection :) See http://www.priscilla.com for your answer. She's one talented cookie! Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of dk Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Who is Priscilla Oppenheimer ? [7:38662] Who is this mystery woman .. who seems to know everything ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38681&t=38662 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]
make sure your route table isnt goofy. also maybe check the arp cache for mac/ip problems. i have seen this happen with a faulty arp cache. i cleared the arp cache, reset the devices, and verify the arp cache again. hope this helps -Original Message- From: Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187] I do Telnet from a client on VLAN1 and I reach the server just fine. VLAN1 is where the server is also connected to. I do Telnet from any other VLAN: Telnet takes a long time, then it times out. That tells me it is something in the InterVLAN routing. What would be the next step to troubleshoot the problem ? I look into the Cat 5000 configuration but I can't see any relevant changes that caused the problem. If I use a Sniffer, I noticed a delta time larger for the Telnet. However, I don't see any brodcast that could such delay. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38222&t=38187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice Cert [7:37965]
Hi there, I was wondering if anyone can help me on this. I just took the CIPT test and there was a question on there that I can not seem to locate the answer for. I am not looking for the answer, merely a resource as to where I can find it. The question is as follows: "What is the error message on the call manager when no more DNs are available. I have looked in the Cisco Press Ip Telephony book as well as searching on the Cisco site. Once again, is there anyone that could help me locate a resource to finding this answer? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37965&t=37965 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISL or 802.1q? [7:37859]
good point. i think they are working on a standard for that now but i may be
wrong.
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL or 802.1q? [7:37859]
add the CAT4K to your list of dot1q only devices. The old arguement
of dot1q not supporting per VLAN spanning is also moot.
Dave
Patrick Ramsey wrote:
>
> well here is a quote from cisco's site
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html
>
> "Catalyst 2950 series switches only support 802.1q trunking. They do not
> support ISL trunking"
>
> and the 2950 is one of their best of breed switches...maybe this means
they
> will begettign rid of isl soon...
>
> -Patrick
>
> >>> "Audy Bautista" 03/11/02 10:18AM >>>
> I've always had the same question in my head. In our environment (all
> Cisco; at least 4 6509s and about a dozen 2948s, some 3548s, 2924s, etc.)
we
> use 802.1q mostly because the 2948s don't support ISL. We even trunk the
> 6509s using 802.1q even though of course 6509s support ISL and 802.1q.
But
> I don't know which one is better, and I've done similar searches in the
past
> for more info; no luck.
>
> Audy
>
> ""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Repost. First one didn't make it.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Kaminski, Shawn G
> > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:54 PM
> > > To: 'Groupstudy'
> > > Subject: ISL or 802.1q?
> > >
> > > After a search of the archives and reading the posts, I realize this
has
> > > been discussed before. I also searched CCO. However, there didn't seem
> to
> > > be a clear answer on what I was looking for. We have two Distribution
> > > Cisco 6509 switches trunked together and there is an argument as to
> > > whether we should use ISL or 802.1q on this trunk. Our network is all
> > > Cisco. Some people are saying 802.1q on everything because Cisco is
> > > leaning towards this direction anyway. Some say ISL should be used
> between
> > > the Distribution switches and 802.1q between Distribution and Access
> > > switches. I don't know why because I couldn't find anything on this.
> Some
> > > of the people here keep saying that ISL has more "features" than
802.1q.
> > > Could some of you please give your opinions about what you would use
> (ISL
> > > or 802.1q) in this situation?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shawn G. Kaminski
> > > EDS Network Engineering - DowNET
> > Confidentiality DisclaimerThis email and any files
transmitted with it may contain confidential and
> /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
> Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to
whom
> addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
> privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
> copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
> subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
> email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete
this
> email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
--
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367
"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37876&t=37859
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISL or 802.1q? [7:37859]
i have always practiced using Q trunks because they are a standard. im not sure any one is better than the other. since isl is proprietary, i like the Q's. -Original Message- From: Audy Bautista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISL or 802.1q? [7:37859] I've always had the same question in my head. In our environment (all Cisco; at least 4 6509s and about a dozen 2948s, some 3548s, 2924s, etc.) we use 802.1q mostly because the 2948s don't support ISL. We even trunk the 6509s using 802.1q even though of course 6509s support ISL and 802.1q. But I don't know which one is better, and I've done similar searches in the past for more info; no luck. Audy ""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Repost. First one didn't make it. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kaminski, Shawn G > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:54 PM > > To: 'Groupstudy' > > Subject: ISL or 802.1q? > > > > After a search of the archives and reading the posts, I realize this has > > been discussed before. I also searched CCO. However, there didn't seem to > > be a clear answer on what I was looking for. We have two Distribution > > Cisco 6509 switches trunked together and there is an argument as to > > whether we should use ISL or 802.1q on this trunk. Our network is all > > Cisco. Some people are saying 802.1q on everything because Cisco is > > leaning towards this direction anyway. Some say ISL should be used between > > the Distribution switches and 802.1q between Distribution and Access > > switches. I don't know why because I couldn't find anything on this. Some > > of the people here keep saying that ISL has more "features" than 802.1q. > > Could some of you please give your opinions about what you would use (ISL > > or 802.1q) in this situation? > > > > Thanks, > > Shawn G. Kaminski > > EDS Network Engineering - DowNET Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37862&t=37859 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dennis Laganiere's rif examples [7:36228]
actually Dennis has a book out with ccbootcamp. you can find it on amazon isbn #1931881006. I went to a class that Dennis put on and he helped me understand all about bridging and RIF's. This book is a good asset to have in your CCIE library..i also have that book reviewed on amazon. -Original Message- From: Eric Mwambaji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dennis Laganiere's rif examples [7:36228] Does anyone have a url to Dennis Laganiere's rif examples? I almost have this RIF thing down but I could use a few more examples. Eric CCNP __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36235&t=36228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dennis Laganiere's rif examples [7:36228]
hes on this list somewhere ...:) but you might want to check the groupstudy archive -Original Message- From: Eric Mwambaji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dennis Laganiere's rif examples [7:36228] Does anyone have a url to Dennis Laganiere's rif examples? I almost have this RIF thing down but I could use a few more examples. Eric CCNP __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36232&t=36228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on th [7:35549]
telent is also a good one -Original Message- From: s vermill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on th [7:35549] Yes, I should create aliases to respond to my constant attempts to get the router to 'ship' things (sh ip), 'sharp' things (sh arp), and my personal favorite, 'show urn' (you guessed it - sh run). Wright, Jeremy wrote: > > look into creating aliases...those are always good for saving > time Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35848&t=35549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on the CCIE lab. [7:35550]
also, check the groupstudy database...there was a list of aliases that a guy put on the list -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on the CCIE lab. [7:35547] Better than the CTRL+R that I've been using. > -Original Message- > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on the CCIE lab. > [7:35541] > > > That's a really good one. I hate it when the console blasts > some stupid > message at you while you're typing. It still throws me off > even though I > should be used to it. ;-) Thanks for telling us about this. > > Priscilla > > At 02:11 PM 2/15/02, Sean Knox wrote: > >I always enter console config and turn on "logging > synchronous"; it inserts > >a carriage return automatically after system messages show > up. Doesn't hurt > >to enable it on the vtys either. > > > >core8500#conf t > >Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > >core8500(config)#line con 0 > >core8500(config-line)#logg sync > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:32 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on the CCIE lab. > >[7:35523] > > > > > >no ip domain-lookup (how do you spell pnig again) > >terminal escape-char 3 (Press Ctrl-c to break out of ping & Telnet) > > > >Anybody got others? > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35550&t=35550 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on the CCIE lab. [7:35549]
look into creating aliases...those are always good for saving time -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on the CCIE lab. [7:35547] Better than the CTRL+R that I've been using. > -Original Message- > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on the CCIE lab. > [7:35541] > > > That's a really good one. I hate it when the console blasts > some stupid > message at you while you're typing. It still throws me off > even though I > should be used to it. ;-) Thanks for telling us about this. > > Priscilla > > At 02:11 PM 2/15/02, Sean Knox wrote: > >I always enter console config and turn on "logging > synchronous"; it inserts > >a carriage return automatically after system messages show > up. Doesn't hurt > >to enable it on the vtys either. > > > >core8500#conf t > >Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > >core8500(config)#line con 0 > >core8500(config-line)#logg sync > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:32 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on the CCIE lab. > >[7:35523] > > > > > >no ip domain-lookup (how do you spell pnig again) > >terminal escape-char 3 (Press Ctrl-c to break out of ping & Telnet) > > > >Anybody got others? > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35549&t=35549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secondary ip address and ip helper-address [7:35533]
i guess if you wanted to bounce the interface by flip flopping (please note my english skills) the primary and secondary addresses and see what happens..unless of course this is a major production router -Original Message- From: J-B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Secondary ip address and ip helper-address [7:35533] I have done what you just mentioned(everything works except DHCP), the range that needs to be pass out is the new range which is related to the new ip secondary address. The user in Hub site(current ip layout is 192.168.1.0) should get an ip address for the new layout(192.168.13.0) ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > As a test, statically configure a client to be on the 192.168.2.0 network > with correct gateway info, mask, etc. Then 1, try pinging the server and see > if that works, and two, change config to dhcp then. What range is the dhcp > server supposed to be passing out, the secondary addresses range, because it > won't work either. The DHCP server must pass out the primary address range > because that's where the packet is coming from. > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > ""J-B"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well the clients have not ip address, what we are doing is remove all ip > > address from the clients and enable DHCP > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I bet the clients are on the new secondary networks? Is that true, > > because > > > if so, ip helper only works on the primary interface's address and not > on > > > the clients on the secondary network. It won't pick up the secondary > > > networks broadcasts. > > > > > > -- > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > ""J-B"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Team, > > > > I have the following problem: > > > > > > > > Our network has 10 sites, I am in the process of readdressing current > > > > network. I have setup secondary ip address on every site, At the > present > > > > time I am setting up a wk2000 dhcp/win server in one site. The problem > > is > > > > that I am not able to obtain ip address from the DHCP server via the > > WAN, > > > it > > > > works fine in the site where it is locate. The layout is the > following: > > > > > > > > Hub site > > > > > > > > interface Ethernet0 > > > > ip address 192.168.13.1 255.255.255.0 secondary > > > > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > ip helper-address 192.168.12.17 > > > > ip directed-broadcast > > > > no cdp enable > > > > > > > > interface Serial0 > > > > no ip address > > > > ip directed-broadcast > > > > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > > > > no ip mroute-cache > > > > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > > > > > > > > interface Serial0.3 point-to-point > > > > description Spoke site > > > > bandwidth 384 > > > > ip unnumbered Ethernet0 > > > > ip helper-address 192.168.12.17 > > > > ip directed-broadcast > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 26 > > > > > > > > Spoke site > > > > > > > > interface Ethernet0 > > > > ip address 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.0 secondary > > > > ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > > > interface Serial0 > > > > no ip address > > > > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > > > > no fair-queue > > > > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > > > > ! > > > > interface Serial0.1 point-to-point > > > > description connection to Hub > > > > ip unnumbered Ethernet0 > > > > bandwidth 384 > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 16 > > > > ! > > > > > > > > The ip address of the DHCP sever is 192.168.12.17 > > > > > > > > Be aware that I have not problem pinging to the DHCP server from the > Hub > > > > site. > > > > > > > > Team, what I am doing wrong > here...HELP > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks (nothing can replace experiencewo) > > > > > > > > > > > > JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35545&t=35533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secondary ip address and ip helper-address [7:35539]
do you have a scope setup in dhcp server for that range? -Original Message- From: J-B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Secondary ip address and ip helper-address HELPP [7:35532] Team, I have the following problem: Our network has 10 sites, I am in the process of readdressing current network. I have setup secondary ip address on every site, At the present time I am setting up a wk2000 dhcp/win server in one site. The problem is that I am not able to obtain ip address from the DHCP server via the WAN, it works fine in the site where it is locate. The layout is the following: Hub site interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.13.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 192.168.12.17 ip directed-broadcast no cdp enable interface Serial0 no ip address ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay IETF no ip mroute-cache frame-relay lmi-type ansi interface Serial0.3 point-to-point description Spoke site bandwidth 384 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 ip helper-address 192.168.12.17 ip directed-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 26 Spoke site interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF no fair-queue frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point description connection to Hub ip unnumbered Ethernet0 bandwidth 384 frame-relay interface-dlci 16 ! The ip address of the DHCP sever is 192.168.12.17 Be aware that I have not problem pinging to the DHCP server from the Hub site. Team, what I am doing wrong here...HELP Thanks (nothing can replace experiencewo) JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35539&t=35539 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash & DRam [7:35490]
use the IOS upgrade planner on cisco's site -Original Message- From: richard roe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 7:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash & DRam [7:35490] To the powers that be, What is the recommended flash and ram capacity in MB, that is required to run IOS 12.0 & above? and are there different requirements for different types/series of switches and routers? Am trying to put together a lab with a couple of routers and switches for testing purposes and was wondering about the hardware requirements. Any comments/insights/help on this would be appreciated. thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35494&t=35490 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VLan Ooops [7:34680]
check into making that port a trunkisl, 802.1q (isl=cisco proprietary, q=standard) -Original Message- From: Nisus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLan Ooops [7:34680] Hello All, I have been posting questions about VLans and I think I may have not worded the question right. If I have multiple VLans can they all go out the uplink port on my switch to my router ? I am setting up VLans by port NOT IP or MAC address ??? Thanks a ton Steven M Aiello Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34685&t=34680 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Average afterwork time Tech learning commitment? [7:34634]
i tend to stick with leslie nielson's sayings..."like a midget at a urinal, ill have to stay on my toes" (in reference to my lab studying) back to OSPF -Original Message- From: Cebuano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Average afterwork time Tech learning commitment? [7:34634] As Joe jackson said... We don't know what happens when we die We only know we die too soon But then we have to try Or else the world becomes a waiting room. Now on to Doyle, Parkhurst, Solie, Caslow, Berkowitz... - Original Message - From: "Mike Sweeney" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:17 PM Subject: RE: Average afterwork time Tech learning commitment? [7:34634] > You get out it what you put into it. Its that simple. > > I know far too many people who would do well but refuse to admit that they > need to spend some time studying. "why wont they pay for it" is the biggest > whine.. you are entitled to NOTHING in this world except to die at some > point so it's really up to you where to go and how to get there. > > In my years, I have had the commute from hell and I used audio tapes and > studied during lunchtime instead of going out with the guys. I squeezed in > some class time at the college. I've spent time carpooling with the express > idea of reading.. I have a laptop so I can at the least run sims on the run. > I take it to family functions and it's understood that after a few hours of > togetherness, I will disappear for a few hours of study time. I've explained > to my daughter that even daddy has homework to do and so we each do our > *homework* at the same time. She normally is done first :) > > And yes, a long suffering wife helps out alot. And I do make a point of some > days, blowing off Cisco/networks/PCs to spend time with family and friends.. > it's a tough balancing act to do. > > If there is a will, there is a way. > > MikeS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34684&t=34634 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pinging all the way!!! [7:34611]
ping 1.1.1.1 -t -Original Message- From: Tel Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pinging all the way!!! [7:34611] Hi folks, As far as i know if you ping an address it will usally responsed with 4 lines TTL. If i want to continue the ping lets say for over an hour is there a command to do this? Thanks in advance. Tel Example: C:\>ping cisco.com Pinging cisco.com [198.133.219.25] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 198.133.219.25: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=238 Reply from 198.133.219.25: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=238 Reply from 198.133.219.25: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=238 Reply from 198.133.219.25: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=238 Ping statistics for 198.133.219.25: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 160ms, Maximum = 161ms, Average = 160ms Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34616&t=34611 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TAC Update [7:34115]
Just wanted to let you guys know if you haven't seen this: The new "Hardware Troubleshooting Index" page on the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC) Web Site brings you a suite of documents that can help prevent downtime due to unnecessarily replacing the most common routers, switches, and modems. Organized by Cisco platform, the resources on the "Hardware Troubleshooting Index" page help you determine if a problem is due to hardware failure. If you do have a hardware problem, these documents further assist in pinpointing the exact component that needs to be replaced. Troubleshooting documents are available for the following products: * Cisco AS5200 and AS5300 Series universal access servers * Cisco Modem ISDN Channel Aggregation (MICA) modems * Cisco 1600, 2600, 3600, 6400, and 7200 Series routers * Cisco uBR7200 Series and uBR7246 VXR universal broadband routers * Cisco 7500 Series routers, route switch processors (RSPs), and versatile interface processors (VIPs) * Cisco CVA120 and uBR900 Series cable modems * Cisco Catalyst(R) 2900XL/3500XL Series switches * Cisco Catalyst 5500/5000/2926G/2926 Series switches * Cisco Catalyst 2948G-L3/4908G-L3 Series switches * Cisco Catalyst 6000 Series switches * Cisco Gigabit Switch Router (GSR) 12000 Series line cards * Catalyst 6500/6000 Multilayer Switch Feature Card (MSFC1 and MSFC2) Keep your downtime to a minimum with the new "Hardware Troubleshooting Index" page: http://www.cisco.com/tac/newsflash/hardware_troubleshoot_013102.html Sincerely, Cisco Technical Assistance Center Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34115&t=34115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
I would offer them a CCIE engraved toilet bowl because they would be full of...i wont finish that sentence Paul :) just joking -Original Message- From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE starting pay [7:33899] Man that's an insult. A CCIE with no experience. I guess I will go back to building race cars. -Original Message- From: Joe Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE starting pay [7:33899] what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33930&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please confirm (conf#fb792ccfb07217442883ed571180717a) [7:33734]
-Original Message- From: Paulo Baptista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Please confirm (conf#fb792ccfb07217442883ed571180717a) [7:33732] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quarta-feira, 30 de Janeiro de 2002 17:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please confirm (conf#fb792ccfb07217442883ed571180717a) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 12:31:24 2002 Received: from invicto.rumos.pt ([192.199.26.5]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19494 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:31:23 -0500 Received: by INVICTO with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:35:28 - Message-ID: From: Paulo Baptista To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" Subject: IPX host static name possible? Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:35:22 - MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all! Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host name to an IPX address. Like we do for IP addresses This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. Thanks for any reply, Paulo --_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" IPX host static name possible? Hi all! Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host name to an IPX address. Like we do for IP addresses <(config)# ip host NAME x.x.x.x> This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. Thanks for any reply, Paulo --_=_NextPart_001_01C1A9B4.7E6FFB40-- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33734&t=33734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
no mouse?? :) -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I never actually saw any equipment just a monitor and keyboard. I could hazzard a guess though that most of the equipment was Cisco. ;-> -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] Hello, Has anyone is this group taken the new one-day lab recently? Wanted to know what kind of routers did you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or still just 6? What models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, is it still the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and work on it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) Thanks! _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33607&t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ** MEAN router tricks, (was RE: **stupid router tricks) [7:32318]
aliasescan be pretty nasty if you think about it -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ** MEAN router tricks, (was RE: **stupid router tricks) [7:32314] I guess some of us are more devious than others, in honor of those members, lets hear your worst trick that you played on some poor ccna candidate, or was played on you by a student, etc... (e.g.) -exec-timeout 1 -banner motd (thanks Priscilla =) SYNTAX ERROR ROUTER CANNOT INITIALIZE CONTACT CISCO TECHNICAL SUPPORT IMMEDIATELY -hostname to # or > or to the name of some other router that they frequently Telnet to. -"test crash" __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32318&t=32318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Custom Telnet Application [7:31889]
count me in -Original Message- From: Brad Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Custom Telnet Application [7:31889] Would anyone be interested in using a custom telnet application that has some built-in macros? (sh ip route, some initial setup stuff, automated switching between devices on a comm-server, etc) If you're interested in something like this, please RESPOND to this message on Groupstudy with your email address. If there's enough of a response, I'll write the app and email it to you when it's done. Also, if you want to suggest some custom macro's or custom features, include them in your post. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31908&t=31889 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - CCIE Written class [7:31437]
I took this class and Dennis helped out tremendously. I would recommend it to anyone wanting to cap off their studying for the test and to clear up any gray areaslike the wonderful world of bridging. No I dont work for Dennis. -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT - CCIE Written class [7:31437] I'm going to be teaching one of my occasional 3-day CCIE Written BootCamp sessions in Los Angeles the first week in February. CCBootCamp is sponsoring the event, and we've had very good success with it in the past. We spend two days lecturing and reviewing the topics covered on the exam, interspersed with pop quizzes and drills. The third day we do a mock exam, last minute review and then take the actual exam. You'll find feedback on the class in the group archives. Please check the ccbootcamp webpage or contact me off-line if you're interested in joining us. Thanks... --- Dennis Laganiere Author of Boson CCIE Written exam #3, and the NLI Study Guide for the CCIE Written Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31474&t=31437 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 2950-24 [7:31137]
does anyone have any experience with the Cisco 2950-24 port switch? We are thinking of purchasing a few but i wanted to get some feedback from the list first. thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31137&t=31137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: packet loss in LAN [7:30210]
we have had numerous problems with auto negotiation. 100 half 10 half with 100 full capabilities yada yada yada. you might also want to make sure that your uplinks are nailed down to the correct speed/duplex so the autonegotiation wont screw that up too. -Original Message- From: Walker, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: packet loss in LAN [7:30210] Check to see if you are able to run 100meg/full duplex and set the switch port accordingly. Jim Walker Master Network Engineer Partners HealthCare System, Inc. Information Systems / Technical Services & Operations Tel. (617) 732-8803 Fax (617) 264-5130 This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of this message and attachments. Thank you. -Original Message- From: Rajneesh Yadav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 1:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: packet loss in LAN [7:30210] Hi, I am getting packet loss in my LAN network,If i ping to any Machine I got some packet loss after 10or 5 minutes.I changed the Switch and also checked the Cabling also,i dint find any error.I have compaq WIN NT server and workstations.Please help me out. Regards Rajneesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30218&t=30210 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Completely OT: StarWars [7:28204]
i personally like: router(config)# no route-flap -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Completely OT: StarWars [7:28204] Yes and I found another helpful global command this morning Router(config)#service do as i think not as i type Dave Bill Carter wrote: > > I don't want anyone to break the NDA, but is this on the CCIE lab?? The > trick is, you would have to use > > service compress-config > > ip route 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 R2D2 > ip route 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 C3PO > > Router bgp 4 > neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 5 > neighbor 1.1.1.1 ebgp-multihop GalaxyFarFarAway > > Router ospf 1 > redistribute static subnets subgalaxies > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Sasa Milic > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Completely OT: StarWars [7:28204] > > StarWars episode IV in text mode: > > telnet to towel.blinkenlights.nl -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28226&t=28204 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP process [7:28068]
on our core router, every once in a while we will drop some telnet connections. When this happens I look at "show proc cpu" and see that overall util is 89% in which 69% of that traffic is snmp. Obviously this is not good. The router is a 7507. Anyone have any suggestions on this? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28068&t=28068 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE R/S written [7:27968]
i believe that would be boson #3 -Original Message- From: juno vtv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE R/S written [7:27968] The boson exam with over 400 question was written by Dennis Laganiere. Sorry if I mangled your last name Dennis. -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28014&t=27968 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sniffer Pro Graph Bandwidth [7:27324]
talk to sniffer about getting the Reporter addition to the Pro. It automatically generates reports, charts, bar graphs..yada yada yada...stuff with a lot of color that will impress your boss even though you only clicked a few buttons. -Original Message- From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Sniffer Pro Graph Bandwidth [7:27324] Hello, I would like to know if it is possible for me to generate a graph showing network throughput from a capture I have done in Sniffer Pro. I am trying to get a good idea of how specific actions on an end-station use bandwidth, but the only info I can find is an "average utilization", which doesn't do me any good for seeing bandwidth spikes, etc Any info is appreciated! Thanks! Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27327&t=27324 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Packet analyzer [7:27295]
I would also check into the distributed sniffer... -Original Message- From: Mike Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Packet analyzer [7:27295] For those using Sniffer, it's SnifferBook or the older version which is a the WANBook.. it's a smallish chassis that has changable cards with a couple of ether interfaces plus serial. Like said before, these *toys* are pricy but effective. MikeS Angel Leiva wrote: > > Akim, > > The product that you may be looking for is made by Agilent > Technologies (a > HP spinoff). > For more information visit this URL: > > http://onenetworks.comms.agilent.com/agilentadvisor/J2300E.asp > > The Agilent Advisor is powerful and imho offers similar levels > of packet > capture/decoding as the products you mentioned. > Just beware, it isn't any cheap. As to where you physically > connect the > Agilent Advisor: it goes connected between your CSU/DSU and/or > router and > the physical media you use for that serial connection. Thus, it > is service > disrupting. In a production environment, you would need to use > it during a > scheduled maintenance window. > > Hth, > > Angel > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of > A.Steinbock > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 10:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Packet analyzer [7:27295] > > > I use Etherpeek to capture Ethernet packets and analyze them. > The same company has a similar product "Tokenpeek" that can > capture Token > rings packets. Data for both are captured by connecting to the > Ether or > Token > switch. > > My question is: How do you capture the packets on a serial line? > What software do you use and where do you physically connect? > > Tks, > Akim > > > > > > Get free e-mail and a permanent address at > http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27319&t=27295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advanced BGP Class [7:26838]
they really need to update their web site...they are still teaching crappletalk according to it...along with other technologies that were eliminated a long while back by Cisco. -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Advanced BGP Class [7:26838] check out computerdata.com, they're just a cisco training partner that hires mr. mobley. I think the class is $3995 for the week. Not bad if work's paying. Here's some confirmation info from computer data. This is to confirm your seat in the following course: Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Starting on November 26, 2001 Length of class: 5 days Prereq: A good understanding of the operation and configuration of Interior Routing Protocols especially EIGRP and OSPF. This class is intended to introduce students to the concepts and configuration of the Border Gateway Protocol and lead students to an understanding of many of the tools and techniques used in more advanced BGP implementations. All of the configurations and labs will be conducted using Cisco Systems routers. This course will be taught by Larry Mobley, who also developed the course. The Cisco equipment will be accessed remotely. All courses start at 9:00 a.m. on the first day of class. Classes end approximately at 5:00 p.m. with an hour for lunch. We are located at 25786 Commerce Drive, Madison Heights, MI 48071 (Northwest of the I-696 and Dequindre intersection, just West of Lincoln Avenue and North off the I-696 Service Drive). For detailed map see attached. In the event that you need to reschedule or cancel your registration for this course, arrangements must be made at least 30 days prior to the class start date to prevent a charge to your company. Cancellation or rescheduling a class less than 30 days will be charged full course tuition. Thank you for choosing Computer Data, Inc. Please call me if you have any questions at 810-212-1296. > -Original Message- > From: Lupi, Guy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Advanced BGP Class [7:26838] > > Tim, how much was the class, is there a url that you can give me? Sounds > interesting. > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Deal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Advanced BGP Class [7:26838] > > > ""Ouellette, Tim"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm taking the Computer Data Advanced BGP class next week taught by > Larry > > Mobley. I was wondering if anyone has taken this class and if so what > they > > thought of it. A couple of guys here at EDS have taken it and just loved > it > > and was wondering if that's the global consensus. Anything I should > review > > prior to the class. I'm planning on reviewing the IRA book by Halabi. > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > Tim, > > I have worked with Larry in the past before--he was the first person that > I > knew of that had developed a 5-day BGP class. At this time Global > Knowledge > had a 3-day one and Cisco didn't even have one. Having taught for many > years, when I saw Larry teach, I knew, hands-down, that he was the best > instructor that I had ever seen. You'll really like him and you'll really > enjoy the BGP class he developed. If I recall correctly, each BGP router > pod > has 5 routers which you and a classmate will share. If you are planning > for > the CCIE, this is a must-have class! > > One thing that surprised me about your post was that Computer Data was > sponsoring the class--Larry used to do his teaching through IMS in > Atlanta. > I've had problems with IMS in the past (ie, them not paying me money they > owed me) and Larry probably ran into the same thing. If you take the > class, > please tell Larry I said "hi!" and I'd be curious to find out what he's up > to. > > Best of luck Time! > -- > __ > > Richard Deal > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web: http://pages.prodigy.net/richard.deal > > * Just finished a CCNA ebook available at Boson (www.boson.com): > + "CCNA Secrets Revealed!" > > * CCNP test author for QuizWare (www.quizware.com) > + CCNA #1 and #2 -- 550 questions each! > + CCNP Routing #1 -- 500 questions > + CCNP Switching #1 -- 500 questions > + CCNP Remote Access #1 -- 500 questions > + CCNP Support #1 -- 500 questions > > * Author of the following Coriolis books: > + "CCNP Switching Exam Cram" > + "CCNP Remote Access Exam Prep" > + "CCNP Cisco Lan Switch Configuration Exam Cram" > __ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26894&t=26838 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription in
RE: Passed CCIE written! [7:26765]
congrats... -Original Message- From: Tim Booth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passed CCIE written! [7:26765] Hello all, I'm happy to report I passed my IE written just today. Whew!! Now on to the lab.. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26766&t=26765 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is the NLI CCIE Lab package worth $650? [7:26653]
Brent, I feel like there lab package is worth the money. You can probably get some other items for less but it won't hit you as hard or as much in certain key areas, which I feel is essential...I have numerous study aids but nothing has helped me more than lab scenarios/rack time that kicks my butt...that is the only way it gets drilled in my head. Most people will tell you that their packages are a great addition to your arsenal. Yeah other people have other preferences..but just wanted to tell you what I have had luck with. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26757&t=26653 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920]
I wasn't trying to be mean at all. I'm sure they have a decent product. But my thought process is that ccbootcamp has a proven success record with teaching CCIE level material and I would prefer to stick with that type of history. Their website is www.ccbootcamp.com -Original Message- From: Thompson, Kenny (K.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:34 AM To: 'Jeremy Wright'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] ouch! That was hard, but I think I will go with your suggestion Jeremy. In the mean time do you know the site for the ccboot camp so I can get the lab material. Rgds kenny -Original Message- From: Jeremy Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] You've been selling your labs since July and no one has passed using them? I'd say they are a complete waste of money if that's the case. I've met the guys from ccbootcamp and I guarantee they run a first class operation. I think the smartest move is to use what has a proven track record in the CCIE process. > From: ""Michael Cinquanti"" > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:12 PM > Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] > > > > I too am completely biased (since I'm the > Publisher of CertificationZone > > and we sell the IPexpert Lab Workbook), but the > fact that Mr. Ellis knows > > 150 CCIEs who have used his service does not > support the idea that > > one Lab reference is the *best choice*. Since the > ZONE has only been > > selling the IPexpert Lab Workbook since July, Brad > knows that we do not > yet > > have 150 customers who have used our book and > passed the Lab Exam. But > > based on the way our book is flying off the shelf > and based on the fact > > that qualified reviewers have told us that our > reference is an excellent > > study > > tool, I suspect that it won't be too long before > we do have that many > > CCIEs and more. > > > > As for constant updating, in the past three > months, the IPexpert Workbook > > has been updated two times and already includes a > sample lab in the new > > one-day format. Yet another Update is being > prepared now and will be > > distributed, free-of-charge, to anyone who owns a > previous version. > > > > We have also had people who've passed the lab and > people who've failed the > > lab review our book from cover-to-cover. The > results are unanimous. They > > think the IPexpert Book is a great preparation > resource for the Lab Exam > > and worth every penny it costs. We've published > one such review (from a > guy > > who's currently preparing for his second Lab Exam > attempt) at the ZONE > > website. We should have a second review (from a > guy who's already earned > > his CCIE) posted at the site sometime this month. > > > > But I can't answer Pieter-Jan's original question > -- and neither can Brad > > Ellis. Postings on Newsgroups and Mailing Lists > can be helpful, but don't > > depend completely on what you read there. I urge > all CCIE lab candidates > > looking for appropriate references to examine all > the alternatives > > carefully. Visit the websites, use e-mail and > those toll free phone > > numbers, examine the qualifications of the > authors, ask for references, > and > > contact those references directly. If you find two > you like and can afford > > to do so, buy them both. Good luck with the Lab > Exam. > > > > >I am completely biased (since I am one of the > owner's of NLI), but I do > know > > >of over 150 CCIE's that have used the ccbootcamp > labs to get their > CCIE...I > > >havent heard of one CCIE yet that has used the > other labs to get their #. > > >:) > > > > > >Also, the bootcamp labs are constantly being > updated and added on to. In > > >fact, we are in the process of modifying all of > our old labs by removing > the > > >obsolete technology and changing them to a 1-day > format (which means we > give > > >you pre-config files with IP addresses, not a > real big deal there). > > > > > >thanks, > > >-Brad Ellis > > >CCIE#5796 > > >Network Learning Inc > > >www.ccbootcamp.com > > > > > >""Pieter-Jan Bakhu
Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920]
You've been selling your labs since July and no one has passed using them? I'd say they are a complete waste of money if that's the case. I've met the guys from ccbootcamp and I guarantee they run a first class operation. I think the smartest move is to use what has a proven track record in the CCIE process. > From: ""Michael Cinquanti"" > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:12 PM > Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] > > > > I too am completely biased (since I'm the > Publisher of CertificationZone > > and we sell the IPexpert Lab Workbook), but the > fact that Mr. Ellis knows > > 150 CCIEs who have used his service does not > support the idea that > > one Lab reference is the *best choice*. Since the > ZONE has only been > > selling the IPexpert Lab Workbook since July, Brad > knows that we do not > yet > > have 150 customers who have used our book and > passed the Lab Exam. But > > based on the way our book is flying off the shelf > and based on the fact > > that qualified reviewers have told us that our > reference is an excellent > > study > > tool, I suspect that it won't be too long before > we do have that many > > CCIEs and more. > > > > As for constant updating, in the past three > months, the IPexpert Workbook > > has been updated two times and already includes a > sample lab in the new > > one-day format. Yet another Update is being > prepared now and will be > > distributed, free-of-charge, to anyone who owns a > previous version. > > > > We have also had people who've passed the lab and > people who've failed the > > lab review our book from cover-to-cover. The > results are unanimous. They > > think the IPexpert Book is a great preparation > resource for the Lab Exam > > and worth every penny it costs. We've published > one such review (from a > guy > > who's currently preparing for his second Lab Exam > attempt) at the ZONE > > website. We should have a second review (from a > guy who's already earned > > his CCIE) posted at the site sometime this month. > > > > But I can't answer Pieter-Jan's original question > -- and neither can Brad > > Ellis. Postings on Newsgroups and Mailing Lists > can be helpful, but don't > > depend completely on what you read there. I urge > all CCIE lab candidates > > looking for appropriate references to examine all > the alternatives > > carefully. Visit the websites, use e-mail and > those toll free phone > > numbers, examine the qualifications of the > authors, ask for references, > and > > contact those references directly. If you find two > you like and can afford > > to do so, buy them both. Good luck with the Lab > Exam. > > > > >I am completely biased (since I am one of the > owner's of NLI), but I do > know > > >of over 150 CCIE's that have used the ccbootcamp > labs to get their > CCIE...I > > >havent heard of one CCIE yet that has used the > other labs to get their #. > > >:) > > > > > >Also, the bootcamp labs are constantly being > updated and added on to. In > > >fact, we are in the process of modifying all of > our old labs by removing > the > > >obsolete technology and changing them to a 1-day > format (which means we > give > > >you pre-config files with IP addresses, not a > real big deal there). > > > > > >thanks, > > >-Brad Ellis > > >CCIE#5796 > > >Network Learning Inc > > >www.ccbootcamp.com > > > > > >""Pieter-Jan Bakhuyzen"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm looking to buy a CCIE Lab Workbook to > prepare for my CCIE Lab in > June > > >> 2002. > > >> I've found the following two on the net: > > >> > > >> - Certificationzone - IPexpert Lab Preparation > Workbook 2.0 > > >> - CCBootcamp - CCIE LAB Package Subscription > > >> > > >> Has anybody used these and which one is > considered the best choice? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Pieter-Jan Bakhuyzen > > >> CCNP, CCDP, MCSE > > Mike Cinquanti > > President > > Genium Publishing Corporation > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26303&t=24920 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE LAB SETUP [7:26281]
check out ccbootcamp.com ...i purchased all of my pod from them. -Original Message- From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE LAB SETUP [7:26281] Hey guys and gals, quick question... sorta... We have some end-of-year-money (govt) and I need a quick list of a minimum and the extras list of hardware for a good CCIE lab. Something that's identical to the actual equipment used in the lab or that's pretty damn close. In other words, if you had a shitload of $ for a lab, what would you buy yourself? I do already have the following: Cat5k w/RSm 7206 w/4port 10BaseT, 4port Fast-Serial several 1900/2900's 2-804w/NT1 isdn routers isdn simulator 2-2502 2-2600 w/WIC1 Cheers, Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26284&t=26281 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Written test [7:24909]
search the archives and you will find many of threads..but for a quick rehash: Caslow, Halabi, Doyle, Boson 1-3, CCIE written book/camp by ccbootcamp.com. This was the exact path I took and I passed with an 810 first try. There is also a little web site called cisco.com that may have a few answers ;) -Original Message- From: DAve Diaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Written test [7:24909] What are some good guides for the written test, wanna buy just one book, any idea? thanks in advance _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24926&t=24909 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What do you cats do for motivation? [7:24549]
I have an 8 port Netgear switch to donate...I'm sure it has all of the functionality of a cat 3900/5500...vtp, isl, vlans yada yada yada :) just joking -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: What do you cats do for motivation? [7:24549] Does anyone here want to setup a free (forever free) online lab? Maybe we could setup a way that we could donate older equipment and have a hub setup somewhere of all this equipment. Each person would swap out setting up labs for that week and each of the other members would have say an hour/day to use the lab. Is this a logistical nightmare? Am I barking up the wrong tree? -Patrick >>> "John Neiberger" 10/29/01 03:18PM >>> If you hear any good suggestions, pass them on! I've been very unmotivated the last couple of days. I was doing really well the last week or so but then I did a DLSw+ lab that kicked my hiney and it sucked the life right out of me. So, I stopped studying for a couple of days a read a Dean Koontz book. :-) I'm hoping that when I go home tonight I'll be back in a studying mood. It definitely can be difficult to remain focused for long periods of time. I think the trick is to keep it interesting, and I get uninterested when I'm studying topics that bore me...like DLSw+ ! That's probably the key right there. Certain topics really interest me (like BGP and general IP routing) but others are tough for me to tackle. If I can make it over those particular hurdles I think I'll be okay. Good luck1 John >>> "Ouellette, Tim" 10/29/01 12:52:21 PM >>> Man O Man. I'm finding it super-tough to stay motivated with all of this super-duper-heavy-geeky CCIE studying that I have to do. How do you guys keep your mind focused and your eyes straight ahead? I find it really easy to answer my phone on a friday night and talk to my buddies, next thing you know i'm at the local pub forgetting my name. I've got soo many books to ready, and soo man labs that I want to do. The light at the end of the tunnel isn't even close to being visable and it's tough. Can anyone help? btw, anyone used any audio tapes/cd's to listen to cisco type stuff during the commute to work? I was thinking about doing something like that but I think hearing my own voice speak would be enough to drive me insane. Any thoughtS? Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24562&t=24549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISL/802.1q info [7:24266]
thanks bryan -Original Message- From: Bryan Osoro To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/26/01 12:40 PM Subject: Re: ISL/802.1q info To All: Here are two links that show the frame formats of ISL and Dot1q, to aide in your "sniffing" process ISL http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/741/4.html 802.1q http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft /121t/121t3/dtbridge.htm -Bryan >From: "Wright, Jeremy" >Reply-To: "Wright, Jeremy" >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" >CC: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" >Subject: ISL/802.1q info >Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:27:19 -0500 > >For you sniffer buffs out thereif you look at a sniffer trace and >compare isl to 802.1q you will see that with isl, the vlan tag info will >come first before the source and destination...in 802.1q you will see the >source and dest. address first then the vlan tagging info. Just some more >info to help with comparison of the two. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24266&t=24266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISL/802.1q info [7:24256]
For you sniffer buffs out thereif you look at a sniffer trace and compare isl to 802.1q you will see that with isl, the vlan tag info will come first before the source and destination...in 802.1q you will see the source and dest. address first then the vlan tagging info. Just some more info to help with comparison of the two. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24256&t=24256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CBAC Performance Issues [7:23573]
Thanks Keyur for the info
-Original Message-
From: Keyur Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:26 PM
To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; Keyur Shah; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: CBAC Performance Issues [7:23573]
If you setup your acl to monitor just telnet traffic, then I would not worry
about perfornamce drop. If you are going to inspect every(or lots of)
tcp/udp packets, then I would.
Remember in cbac, if you apply on external interface, you have to deny
everything you want inspected. But if you apply acl on internal interface
then permit what you want inspected. Also, icmp can not be inspected thru
cbac.
-Keyur Shah-
CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching)
CSS1,CCNA,CCDA,SCSA,SCNA,MCT,MCSE,MCP+I,MCP,CNI,MCNE,CNE,CNA
Hello Computers
"Say Hello to Your Future!"
http://www.hellocomputers.com
Toll-Free: 1.877.794.3556
International: 1.510.795.6815
Eurpoe: +(44)20 7900 3011
Fax: 1.510.291.2250
-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:14 PM
To: 'Keyur Shah'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: CBAC Performance Issues [7:23573]
well we have a 1000 or so devices and there are a lot of internal telnet
sessions going all day...I was thinking about using CBAC on other protocols
besides telnet on the internal interfaces and use the extra secutiy features
like DOS prevention etc. Was thinking about monitoring telnet and all other
connections on the external interfaces.
-Original Message-
From: Keyur Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CBAC Performance Issues [7:23573]
What kind of traffic are you talking about Jeremy? Few megs or 10s or 100s
of mbps?
-Keyur Shah-
CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching)
CSS1,CCNA,CCDA,SCSA,SCNA,MCT,MCSE,MCP+I,MCP,CNI,MCNE,CNE,CNA
Hello Computers
"Say Hello to Your Future!"
http://www.hellocomputers.com
Toll-Free: 1.877.794.3556
International: 1.510.795.6815
Eurpoe: +(44)20 7900 3011
Fax: 1.510.291.2250
-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:46 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: CBAC Performance Issues
What type of network degradation (if any) should I expect if I implement
CBAC? I've read CCO but I would like some real world answers. Thanks for any
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23761&t=23573
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CBAC Performance Issues [7:23573]
well we have a 1000 or so devices and there are a lot of internal telnet sessions going all day...I was thinking about using CBAC on other protocols besides telnet on the internal interfaces and use the extra secutiy features like DOS prevention etc. Was thinking about monitoring telnet and all other connections on the external interfaces. -Original Message- From: Keyur Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CBAC Performance Issues [7:23573] What kind of traffic are you talking about Jeremy? Few megs or 10s or 100s of mbps? -Keyur Shah- CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching) CSS1,CCNA,CCDA,SCSA,SCNA,MCT,MCSE,MCP+I,MCP,CNI,MCNE,CNE,CNA Hello Computers "Say Hello to Your Future!" http://www.hellocomputers.com Toll-Free: 1.877.794.3556 International: 1.510.795.6815 Eurpoe: +(44)20 7900 3011 Fax: 1.510.291.2250 -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:46 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: CBAC Performance Issues What type of network degradation (if any) should I expect if I implement CBAC? I've read CCO but I would like some real world answers. Thanks for any Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23575&t=23573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CBAC Performance Issues [7:23571]
What type of network degradation (if any) should I expect if I implement CBAC? I've read CCO but I would like some real world answers. Thanks for any input. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23571&t=23571 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Question [7:23519]
that is what i thoughtI just needed some verification...we don't have an access-list that would block thatthanks for your help -Original Message- From: Kent Hundley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: LDAP Question [7:23519] No. Unless your have things like access-lists, policy-based routing, etc. configured the router will not know or care about anything above layer 3. i.e. It will only care about IP addresses and IP layer information. (correct checksum, correct MTU, etc) HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wright, Jeremy Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LDAP Question [7:23519] Are there any special configurations on a router to allow LDAP out over my WAN? Thanks for any input... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23547&t=23519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDAP Question [7:23519]
Are there any special configurations on a router to allow LDAP out over my WAN? Thanks for any input... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23519&t=23519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE LAB [7:23303]
www.ccbootcamp.com has all you need in that department -Original Message- From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:CCIE LAB [7:23303] Does anyone out there know where I can get some practice CCIE LABS??? James Williams CCNP,CCDA,MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23351&t=23303 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Security Book [7:22239]
Well, the question came about if there was a security book geared towards the ccie security written. I was just trying to help out a fellow team member with their searching. I have used this company before and have had much success with them, so I'm going in that direction. Thanks, Jeremy -Original Message- From: William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: CCIE Written Security Book [7:22239] Here is the $64,000 though, is it worth the money? Has anyone on the list used it to pass the written? I am interested, very interested in the book if it is truly worth the expense. Thanks, Will -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wright, Jeremy Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 12:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written Security Book [7:22239] Here is the link to the written security book that was floating around early. I'm leaning on going this direction along with some other books: http://www.optsys.net/specials.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22244&t=22239 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: National Geek Guard To Save Data [7:22208]
Yeah, I replied to the author of this article explaining my interest in it.
Please let me/us know if you hear anything.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: National Geek Guard To Save Data
[7:22208]
It's the senator from my state (Sen. Wyden from Oregon)
calling for the
volunteer geek force to help in emergencies. He calls it the
National
Emergency Technology Guard. I think it's a good idea. My
only question is
whether he's over-reacting a bit. I didn't get the
impression that
communications was so terribly poor during the aftermath of
the attacks.
But I wasn't there either.
Anyway, I'm going to look into it. I'll let you all know
what I find out.
Priscilla
At 08:54 AM 10/5/01, Wright, Jeremy wrote:
>Look at this if you have a sec:
>http://www.msnbc.com/news/637621.asp?0dm=C18KT
>
>
>For all you uptight people...I'm not suggesting anything,
starting anything,
>saying I believe in it, saying it will happen...just relax,
it's an
>msnbc.com article...THAT"S IT
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22242&t=22208
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written Security Book [7:22239]
Here is the link to the written security book that was floating around early. I'm leaning on going this direction along with some other books: http://www.optsys.net/specials.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22239&t=22239 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Geek Guard To Save Data [7:22208]
Look at this if you have a sec: http://www.msnbc.com/news/637621.asp?0dm=C18KT For all you uptight people...I'm not suggesting anything, starting anything, saying I believe in it, saying it will happen...just relax, it's an msnbc.com article...THAT"S IT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22208&t=22208 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: guidance needed for CCIE written exam [7:21807]
Doyle volume 1, Halabi, boson 2 and 3, ccie written workbook/camp from ccbootcamp.com -Original Message- From: kruegel kurt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: guidance needed for CCIE written exam [7:21807] personally i am using "bridges router and switches for ccie's" by caslow and boson #1 for prep i'd also like input from anyone else who has passed cciew [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21894&t=21807 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Nationwide Toll Free Outage [7:21859]
Where are you located? We've been hearing reports that it is mostly affecting the midwest, possibly the west coast, but that the east cost is fine. - Jeremy - Original Message - From: "B.J. Wilson" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:00 AM Subject: Re: Nationwide Toll Free Outage [7:21859] > Looks like this database doesn't handle 888 numbers, however - I just called > one with no problem. > > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Jeremy Felt" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:45 AM > Subject: Fw: Nationwide Toll Free Outage [7:21859] > > > > Hi all, > > > > This message was forwarded to me, I was just wondering if anybody knew > > anything further about it. I know not everybody is affected, because we > are > > still getting limited calls on 800 numbers, but we aren't able to dial any > > at all. > > > > - Jeremy > > > > > The centralized database (known as "SMS") that handles the routing for > all > > > toll free numbers in the US is down, so consequently all toll free lines > > in > > > the country are non-operational. This is *not* carrier-specific... it > is > > > affecting all long distance carriers. > > > > > > Unfortunately, I have no additional information at this time. I will > pass > > > along additional information when I receive it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21871&t=21859 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Nationwide Toll Free Outage [7:21859]
Hi all, This message was forwarded to me, I was just wondering if anybody knew anything further about it. I know not everybody is affected, because we are still getting limited calls on 800 numbers, but we aren't able to dial any at all. - Jeremy > The centralized database (known as "SMS") that handles the routing for all > toll free numbers in the US is down, so consequently all toll free lines in > the country are non-operational. This is *not* carrier-specific... it is > affecting all long distance carriers. > > Unfortunately, I have no additional information at this time. I will pass > along additional information when I receive it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21859&t=21859 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Way OT: Interesting Date today [7:21675]
Still OT Next ones: 01-02-2010 11-02-2011 02-02-2020 12-02-2021 03-02-2030 04-02-2040 05-02-2050 06-02-2060 07-02-2070 08-02-2080 09-02-2090 10-12-2101 Sorry, couldn't help it. I love useless information. - Jeremy Felt - Original Message - From: "John Neiberger" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:03 AM Subject: Way OT: Interesting Date today [7:21675] > 10-02-2001... It's a palindrome! When was the last date where this > occurred? Here at work we think it was 08-31-1380. When will the next > one be? :-) Sorry for the OT post, I just thought this was amusing. > > Back to the morning coffee > > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21695&t=21675 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A Whole CCIE Lab For sale [7:21596]
Try boson 1,2,3 and ccbootcamp.com's written workbook or their bootcamp, that is what I used primarily on top of the following...halabi,caslow and doyle...they also have good deals on CCIE lab kits and rack time -Original Message- From: wol kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: A Whole CCIE Lab For sale [7:21596] Hi, Louie I want to know how much does your ccie lab costs for sale ? And also let me know if you have any good study materials for the written exam because i failed the exam last week. It was harder than i thought. Thanks. You can reach me at email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21601&t=21596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Lab Info [7:21067]
Team, thought you might be interested in some of this info if you weren't already aware... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/new_format.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21067&t=21067 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Re: Bet who is the Youngest CCIE [7:21043]
I started studying for my lab at age 4:-) -Original Message- From: Williams, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:59 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: OT Re: Bet who is the Youngest CCIE I was just hoping to get mine before Alzheimer's kicks in. ;) GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT Re: Bet who is the Youngest CCIE Really, let's not depress those of us(i.e. ME) that are stupid enough to think their going to be a young CCIE, hopefully I'll have mine before i turn 27. Ignorance is definately bliss! -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:46 PM To: Majszak, Monty; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT Re: Bet who is the Youngest CCIE Yeah, This is a hard hitting topic. You would probably get 4x's the replies on the CCNA list though. I think they got a twelve year old CCIE over there. When I do my BGP labs I think about who is the oldest CCIE cause I may break that record. Don - Original Message - From: To: ; ; Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:35 AM Subject: RE: OT Re: Bet who is the Youngest CCIE > don't i look stupid right about now, guess there was more people who cared > about this then i thought, sorry Mamoor, over reacted on that one > > -Monty > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:29 AM > To: Majszak, Monty; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OT Re: Bet who is the Youngest CCIE > > > i act 15 sometimes does that count? > > - Original Message - > From: > To: ; > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:01 AM > Subject: RE: Bet who is the Youngest CCIE > > > > talk about way off topic, who cares!? my friend got his right after > turning > > 22, sorry, you wont the youngest CCIE > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:40 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Bet who is the Youngest CCIE > > > > > > Hi group, > >Just wondering when doing my bgp labs that who is the youngest > > CCIE > > If i pass > > the exam in Feb 2002 i will be of 24ys what about u ??? > > Just let this post go on to hunt for the youngest. > > > > > > -Mamoor > > > > Remember E = Mc2 > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21043&t=21043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advise on CCIE Needed [7:20816]
Try using the CCIE written bootcamp or the written workbook from ccbootcamp.com. Boson 1,2, and 3 are good resources too. -Original Message- From: Shahid Muhammad Shafi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 1:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Advise on CCIE Needed [7:20816] Hi Guys I am preparing for my CCIE written and will give it next month. I am using clark for Swithching, Doyle for Routing and Halabi for BGP. My question is that Caslow is enough for all WAN,Bridging and Voice stuff or I have to consult more resources? Any input highly appreciated. Thanks, Shahid CCDP,CCNP, Wanna be CCIE and JNCIE within one year:) = Shahid Muhammad Shafi Network Engineer Level(3) Communications MCSE+I/MCSE(Win2K),CNA,CCNP,CCDP Please help feed hungry people worldwide http://www.hungersite.com/ A small thing each of us can do to help others less fortunate than ourselves __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20894&t=20816 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Static Route Info [7:19817]
I figured out how to put a description on a static route. I know it probably won't help many of you, but this is one of the anal things I had to do for my boss: ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.2 name static route to web server Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19817&t=19817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Static Route Question [7:19797]
Quick question, what would be the best way to configure a description of a static route, if possible? For example: ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.2 ! Static route to Web Server I know how to put the description on an interface, but the static route table is separate. Any suggestions on what to do? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19797&t=19797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Exam [7:19354]
Oops...sorry about that. My written workbook came with the written bootcamp
so you are right about the price of $129 for just the book. I know it is a
good buy. Check out the written bootcamp if that is do-able. I'm getting
ready to purchase the lab workbook soon.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Luancing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:31 AM
To: Wright, Jeremy
Subject:RE: CCIE Written Exam [7:19354]
Sorry to bother you again, but I see the CCIE Exam
Qualification workbook is $129, the lab exam study
guide is $160. Did you buy the lab or Qualification
study guide?
- Dave
--- "Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
> The workbook is $160 and not the bootcamp but yes
> the workbook is well worth
> the money. Look through there web site for more
> detailed info.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Luancing
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 6:10
PM
> To: Wright, Jeremy
> Subject:RE: CCIE Written Exam
[7:19354]
>
> Jeremy,
> Thanks for your reply.
> Is the CCIE Written bootcamp by
www.ccbootcamp.com
>
> worth the $160? I bought Boson 1.
>
> - Dave
> --- "Wright, Jeremy"
> wrote:
> > I read the CCIE Sybex book and thought
that it
> was
> > ok. It seems to me that
> > it is more of a summary of all of the
topics
> that
> > you need to know. Here is
> > what I used:
> > Jeff Doyle, Routing TCP/IP, Volume 1
> > Caslow, Bridging, Routing, and Switching
for
> CCIE's
> > Volume 2
> > Sybex, CCIE, (Just skimmed over)
> > Halabi, IRA
> > CCIE Written prep book from
www.ccbootcamp.com
> > Boson 1, 2, 3 (Some people have mentioned
that 1
> and
> > 2 where sufficient but
> > I also used 3 and I felt it gave me the
extra
> push I
> > needed)
> > CCIE Written bootcamp by
www.ccbootcamp.com
> > This helped me nail down the topics I was
> > uncomfortable withbridging,
> > RIF's yada yada yada.
> > Drop me an email if I can help you more. I
just
> > passed last Friday using all
> > of the info above.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James liu007
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September
10, 2001 9:49 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:CCIE Written
Exam [7:19354]
> >
> > Hello Group.
> >
> > I am preaparing for CCIE
Exam. I will
> appreciate
> > if you can
> > give me some
> > feedback about Todd Lammle's
CCIE book.
> >
> > Moreover, I have lot of CCIE
BDs /Exam
> notes. I
> > would like
> > to trad
RE: CCIE Written [7:19295]
No, I believe the only way you can get it is through their web site or contacting them directly. Let me know if you need anything else. Jeremy Wright -Original Message- From: Olympia Ric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: CCIE Written [7:19295] Thanks Jeremy. Is the r/s written workbook from ccbootcamp.com also available from bookstores? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19744&t=19295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
