RE: OWA Apology
Title: RE: OWA Apology when dealing with computers there is always the possibility of free beer, booze :) -Original Message-From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA Apology I'm the poor soul that started the thread and I was confused to begin with. Apology accepted (though not needed). I appreciated everyone's help. Now, if I had known there was a possibility of free beer... Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
OWA extra with E2k?
Does OWA come bundled with E2k? Kind regards Nick List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA extra with E2k?
Thanks for that -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA extra with E2k? Yes, Outlook Web Access is component included in Exchange2000. For many it has been the deciding factor to migrate to the product. William -Original Message- From: Newsletter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA extra with E2k? Does OWA come bundled with E2k? Kind regards Nick List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA extra with E2k?
No worries, mate. -Original Message- From: Newsletter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA extra with E2k? Thanks for that -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA extra with E2k? Yes, Outlook Web Access is component included in Exchange2000. For many it has been the deciding factor to migrate to the product. William -Original Message- From: Newsletter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA extra with E2k? Does OWA come bundled with E2k? Kind regards Nick List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Dependencies on start up - in E2k
Hi all, A newbie to this forum so I apologies if I'm treading on any toes. We have a fax solution on our E2k SP2 server called FAXMaker which is served by an external modem for inbound stuff and an ISDN for outbound and it works pretty wellbut when we have to ever restart the server it is important that the following services are started in order otherwise things get 'messy' Fax Service which starts C:\Winnt\system32\faxsvc.exe FAXmaker FAX Server which starts C:\Program files\FAXmaker\fmservic.exe FAXmaker Exchange Connector which starts C:\Program files\FAXmaker\fmexgway.exe Is there a reg hack or similar to get FAXmaker Exchange Connector to depend on FAXmaker FAX Server and then to be depended on by Fax Service starting? Kind regards Nick List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Dependencies on start up - in E2k
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q193888 William -Original Message- From: Newsletter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Dependencies on start up - in E2k Hi all, A newbie to this forum so I apologies if I'm treading on any toes. We have a fax solution on our E2k SP2 server called FAXMaker which is served by an external modem for inbound stuff and an ISDN for outbound and it works pretty wellbut when we have to ever restart the server it is important that the following services are started in order otherwise things get 'messy' Fax Service which starts C:\Winnt\system32\faxsvc.exe FAXmaker FAX Server which starts C:\Program files\FAXmaker\fmservic.exe FAXmaker Exchange Connector which starts C:\Program files\FAXmaker\fmexgway.exe Is there a reg hack or similar to get FAXmaker Exchange Connector to depend on FAXmaker FAX Server and then to be depended on by Fax Service starting? Kind regards Nick List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Active Directory and Exchange 5.5
Hi, I've been asked to upgrade our Windows NT4 domain to Active Directory. We are currently using Exchange 5.5, and I would hope to move to Exchange 2000 in due course. However, I think upgrading both at the same time may be a bit too much work. Is it possible to continue running Exchange 5.5 with all the users being in AD ? Is the AD connector essential in these circumstances. I played with this scenario in a test environment, and after upgrading the domain, I was still able to access Exchange without installing the AD connector. I was under the impression that AD connector HAD to be used after upgrading. My AD domain name and NT domain names were the same, ie. DOMAINNAME became DOMAINNAME.AD. I'm a bit confused as to the role of the AD connector in this scenario. Thanks, Tony. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Active Directory and Exchange 5.5
Absolutely. I consider the migration a 2 step process anyway. I would want to see a secure, stable Active Directory deployment prior to implementing the migration for Exchange. There are several subprojects really: 1) migrate users from NT to Windows2000 AD. 2) Synchronise Exchange 5.5 directory information with AD. 3) Install and migrate to exchange2000. The Active Directory Connector synchronises directory information between Exchange5.5's Directory Services and the Windows2000 Active Directory through the use of Connection Agreements. There is lots to be read. Upgrading Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 to the Windows 2000 Platform http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/55/Upgrade2000.asp And lots more: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/default.asp William -Original Message- From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 4:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Active Directory and Exchange 5.5 Hi, I've been asked to upgrade our Windows NT4 domain to Active Directory. We are currently using Exchange 5.5, and I would hope to move to Exchange 2000 in due course. However, I think upgrading both at the same time may be a bit too much work. Is it possible to continue running Exchange 5.5 with all the users being in AD ? Is the AD connector essential in these circumstances. I played with this scenario in a test environment, and after upgrading the domain, I was still able to access Exchange without installing the AD connector. I was under the impression that AD connector HAD to be used after upgrading. My AD domain name and NT domain names were the same, ie. DOMAINNAME became DOMAINNAME.AD. I'm a bit confused as to the role of the AD connector in this scenario. Thanks, Tony. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
exchnage query
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.comBuy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchnage query
WTF? Free Email? We Don't Need no Stinkin' Free Email!! -Original Message-From: naveen_ipx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: exchnage query Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.comBuy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchnage query
No, we'd rather pay a fortune for Exchange ;-) Phil -Phil RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK -Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 02 July 2002 13:33To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchnage query WTF? Free Email? We Don't Need no Stinkin' Free Email!! -Original Message-From: naveen_ipx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: exchnage query Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.comBuy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchnage query
Title: Message www.incredimail.com :o) Because unused bandwidth is a waste. -Original Message-From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exchnage query WTF? Free Email? We Don't Need no Stinkin' Free Email!! -Original Message-From: naveen_ipx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: exchnage query Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.comBuy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Public Folder Alerts
I have installed the script from http://www.cdolive.com/code.htm which sends an alert to a distribution list when a new message is posted in a Public Folder. New postings work fine but if a reply or forward occurs, the script does not work. Hopefully someone out there has experienced this before and come up with an answer. Help!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange 5.5 Upgrade
Title: Exchange 5.5 Upgrade I've got another question. It doesn't look like my new Exchange server is going to ship for another couple of weeks, bummer. However, I did receive the Exchange 5.5 Enterprise media. My question is this: According to Q240152, I just need to run the setup.exe from the Enterprise CD to change the Type attribute to give me an unlimited store. Does anyone have an idea of how long this upgrade might take? I have an approximately 14.5 GB IS, Exchange 5.5 Standard, SP4, Windows NT 4.0, SP6. I just need a guestimate of time to determine when I can schedule an outage to do this. TIA, Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Note on moving Exch 5.5
As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past weekend. A note on a blip I experienced: I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the old server's IP (I gave the old one a completely different IP) after moving mailboxes so that I would not have to mess with router settings and such for the NAT. It worked fine, because the DNS was still correct, mail came through, etc. On Monday, when people started Outlook and it looked for the new mail server, some users had issues with the new IP. They were trying to resolve to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the old POC. A well meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS entry for the server (GOD NOO). Bad form, but it worked at that moment, which is all users seem to care about. I plan to go back and fix this issue when things settle down. I just wanted to bring this up for posterity's sake. *wink List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Public Folder Alerts
The script uses a particular event which only fires if a new item is created in that folder. If using Outlook with the Exchange provider (no IMAP or OWA) you should be able to fire up such a notification if you hook into the change event. Unfortunately I don't have the specific name of the event handy and it's been about two years when I did such 5.5 stuff. But you should be able to find it on MSDN IIRC. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: Steve Heynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Public Folder Alerts I have installed the script from http://www.cdolive.com/code.htm which sends an alert to a distribution list when a new message is posted in a Public Folder. New postings work fine but if a reply or forward occurs, the script does not work. Hopefully someone out there has experienced this before and come up with an answer. Help!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
server-domain name routing
Title: server-domain name routing I have Exchange 5.5, SP4 and am trying to receive mail from an internal Unix box that is sent as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where server is the Exchange server) I have the routing set at the Internet Mail connector as server.domain.com route to inbound The only way users can receive messages is if each user's recipient record contains a SMTP email address that is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (in addition to their [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Is there any way I can make a setting globally with out having to change each user's record? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Upgrade
Title: Exchange 5.5 Upgrade When I was forced to do this at a company I mentioned in an earlier thread about the store limitations it was done during business hours because Exchange was down J. Time to run the Enterprise setup from CD and reapply the Exchange service packs to the server and have it handling mail again was less than an hourthat was after running a backup first of course. That was on a Dell 4200 with dual processors and 512 Megs of Ram. Luckily all the inbound mail queued on a Unix relay box so we really only lost productivity time. Worked like a charm Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Upgrade I've got another question. It doesn't look like my new Exchange server is going to ship for another couple of weeks, bummer. However, I did receive the Exchange 5.5 Enterprise media. My question is this: According to Q240152, I just need to run the setup.exe from the Enterprise CD to change the Type attribute to give me an unlimited store. Does anyone have an idea of how long this upgrade might take? I have an approximately 14.5 GB IS, Exchange 5.5 Standard, SP4, Windows NT 4.0, SP6. I just need a guestimate of time to determine when I can schedule an outage to do this. TIA, Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Easy question
Hi all: I have a requeriment that the Help desk department just sent me, and I don't know how to do this,,, I am very new on exchange 2000. The thing is they want a distribution list, so the 8 employees that work at the help desk department will receive emails. But they also want them to be able to send as the HD department,, but they don't want the send on behalf detail, appear on the email message. Any ideas?? Enviroment Windows 2000 Advance Server Exchange 2000 Server Active Directory.. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: server-domain name routing
Been there. I never did find a way to do it globally in 5.5 (haven't ever tried it in 2k). The only way I ever got around having the additional smtp addresses was to stick a Sendmail box in the middle as a relay and use a ruleset to rewrite the recipient address on the way through. -Original Message- From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: server-domain name routing I have Exchange 5.5, SP4 and am trying to receive mail from an internal Unix box that is sent as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where server is the Exchange server) I have the routing set at the Internet Mail connector as server.domain.com route to inbound The only way users can receive messages is if each user's recipient record contains a SMTP email address that is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (in addition to their [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Is there any way I can make a setting globally with out having to change each user's record? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Problem with AD integration
Title: Problem with AD integration I have a new E2K Server that I just installed on my W2K native mode Network. I am having issues with Universal Distribution lists. I have one setup called IT Department that does not seem to be replicating properly. When I connect to the Exchange Admin, I can see the Group there, but when I use outlook 2002 I cannot see this group in the list, instead I still see the old CIS Department gropup that had been setup previously. Any ideas? Jason Tilley Network Development Picatinny Federal Credit Union 100 Mineral Springs Drive Dover, NJ 07801 (973) 361 - 5225 x 203 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: server-domain name routing
Title: RE: server-domain name routing I have Exchange 5.5, SP4 and am trying to receive mail from an internal Unix box that is sent as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where server is the Exchange server) I have the routing set at the Internet Mail connector as server.domain.com route to inbound The only way users can receive messages is if each user's recipient record contains a SMTP email address that is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (in addition to their [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Is there any way I can make a setting globally with out having to change each user's record? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 Upgrade
Title: Message Thanks Jay. I'm scheduling a backup to run tomorrow morning @0400 and I'll be here @0500 to do the upgrade. I do have a Linux box sitting in front of Exchange that will queue up inbound email. Sounds like an easy thing to do and I'll get an early start on the holiday weekend :) Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Upgrade When I was forced to do this at a company I mentioned in an earlier thread about the store limitations it was done during business hours because Exchange was down J. Time to run the Enterprise setup from CD and reapply the Exchange service packs to the server and have it handling mail again was less than an hour...that was after running a backup first of course. That was on a Dell 4200 with dual processors and 512 Megs of Ram. Luckily all the inbound mail queued on a Unix relay box so we really only lost productivity time. Worked like a charm Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 Upgrade I've got another question. It doesn't look like my new Exchange server is going to ship for another couple of weeks, bummer. However, I did receive the Exchange 5.5 Enterprise media. My question is this: According to Q240152, I just need to run the setup.exe from the Enterprise CD to change the Type attribute to give me an unlimited store. Does anyone have an idea of how long this upgrade might take? I have an approximately 14.5 GB IS, Exchange 5.5 Standard, SP4, Windows NT 4.0, SP6. I just need a guestimate of time to determine when I can schedule an outage to do this. TIA, Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Note on moving Exch 5.5
As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past weekend. A note on a blip I experienced: I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the old server's IP (I gave the old one a completely different IP) after moving mailboxes so that I would not have to mess with router settings and such for the NAT. It worked fine, because the DNS was still correct, mail came through, etc. On Monday, when people started Outlook and it looked for the new mail server, some users had issues with the new IP. They were trying to resolve to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the old POC. A well meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS entry for the server (GOD NOO). Bad form, but it worked at that moment, which is all users seem to care about. I plan to go back and fix this issue when things settle down. I just wanted to bring this up for posterity's sake. *wink List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Easy question
In Active Directory Users and Computers, go to the security tab and add the 8 users and check the Send As permission for each of them. Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Easy question Hi all: I have a requeriment that the Help desk department just sent me, and I don't know how to do this,,, I am very new on exchange 2000. The thing is they want a distribution list, so the 8 employees that work at the help desk department will receive emails. But they also want them to be able to send as the HD department,, but they don't want the send on behalf detail, appear on the email message. Any ideas?? Enviroment Windows 2000 Advance Server Exchange 2000 Server Active Directory.. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Reoccurring meetings broken after migration?
Anyone have any ideas on the below, or any questions to help troubleshoot? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Reoccurring meetings broken after migration? Background: We recently split off as a new company. The old company used Exchange 5.5. We created a new Exchange 2000 org (different org name) and migrated everyone over a weekend using MailMig and Exmerge when necessary. Problem: People with reoccurring meetings do not have access as meeting organizers to change or delete them. The organizer shows as their old X400 address (/o=org...) from before the migration. How do I give them access to their meetings? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Allowing access for....
Okay, I'm feeling totally dense... was I just had? g Is there such a utility, or are you just tell me to click yes every 10 minutes when it asks??? :) Sorry.. had a very bad couple of weeks and my mind is fried. Thanks, Evan _ Evan A. Brastow Director of Information Technology Automated Emblem Supplies, Inc. 61 Green Street Foxboro, MA 02035-2865 Phone: (508) 543-6511 Ext. 109 Fax: (508) 543-6512 -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Allowing access for Free utility called click yes will do this for you. You can find this and other utilities at Slipstick. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing access for Hi guys, I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from a folder. Only problem is that Outlook 2000 (SR2) only gives me the options of allowing this program access to the folder for one minute, two minutes, 5 minutes or 10 minutes. I would like to set this thing to run overnight, so I'd like, maybe, a 10 hour option? Is there any way of changing the value of these options? I checked the registry and the MSKB, but didn't find anything off the bat. Thanks, Evan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5
Well I found something. There was still a DNS entry for the old IP address. I originally intended to make it separate and make it mail2 or something similar in DNS. I removed the entry and it has cleared most of my problems. - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: Note on moving Exch 5.5 As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past weekend. A note on a blip I experienced: I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the old server's IP (I gave the old one a completely different IP) after moving mailboxes so that I would not have to mess with router settings and such for the NAT. It worked fine, because the DNS was still correct, mail came through, etc. On Monday, when people started Outlook and it looked for the new mail server, some users had issues with the new IP. They were trying to resolve to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the old POC. A well meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS entry for the server (GOD NOO). Bad form, but it worked at that moment, which is all users seem to care about. I plan to go back and fix this issue when things settle down. I just wanted to bring this up for posterity's sake. *wink List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5
Can anyone elaborate on how that works on an NT 4 domain? WINS is correct and a conflicting DNS entry is there? Why does DNS take precedence on an NT4 domain? I thought that was a 2K thing??? (I am sending this to the NT list so stop barking) - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Well I found something. There was still a DNS entry for the old IP address. I originally intended to make it separate and make it mail2 or something similar in DNS. I removed the entry and it has cleared most of my problems. - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: Note on moving Exch 5.5 As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past weekend. A note on a blip I experienced: I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the old server's IP (I gave the old one a completely different IP) after moving mailboxes so that I would not have to mess with router settings and such for the NAT. It worked fine, because the DNS was still correct, mail came through, etc. On Monday, when people started Outlook and it looked for the new mail server, some users had issues with the new IP. They were trying to resolve to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the old POC. A well meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS entry for the server (GOD NOO). Bad form, but it worked at that moment, which is all users seem to care about. I plan to go back and fix this issue when things settle down. I just wanted to bring this up for posterity's sake. *wink List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5
I think it's going to depend on how the WS is configured, particularly that little checkbox that says Use DNS for WINS resolution. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Can anyone elaborate on how that works on an NT 4 domain? WINS is correct and a conflicting DNS entry is there? Why does DNS take precedence on an NT4 domain? I thought that was a 2K thing??? (I am sending this to the NT list so stop barking) - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Well I found something. There was still a DNS entry for the old IP address. I originally intended to make it separate and make it mail2 or something similar in DNS. I removed the entry and it has cleared most of my problems. - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: Note on moving Exch 5.5 As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past weekend. A note on a blip I experienced: I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the old server's IP (I gave the old one a completely different IP) after moving mailboxes so that I would not have to mess with router settings and such for the NAT. It worked fine, because the DNS was still correct, mail came through, etc. On Monday, when people started Outlook and it looked for the new mail server, some users had issues with the new IP. They were trying to resolve to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the old POC. A well meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS entry for the server (GOD NOO). Bad form, but it worked at that moment, which is all users seem to care about. I plan to go back and fix this issue when things settle down. I just wanted to bring this up for posterity's sake. *wink List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
OWA password change
We are running Ex5.5 sp4 on W2k sp2 backend and IIS/OWA on W2k sp2 front end. Most of our consultants are never at the office and receive all there mail using OWA. The system is only exposed to the internet on SSL and we have been using the IISADMPWD .htr programs to change passwords every 90 days. With the recent problems with respect to MS02-028 Heap overrun int HTR I am wondering about alternative solutions to enable my users to change there passwords from IIS. TIA Dave Vantine List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Allowing access for....
LOL. There is actually a utility called ClickYes. http://www.express-soft.com/mailmate/clickyes.html Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for Okay, I'm feeling totally dense... was I just had? g Is there such a utility, or are you just tell me to click yes every 10 minutes when it asks??? :) Sorry.. had a very bad couple of weeks and my mind is fried. Thanks, Evan _ Evan A. Brastow Director of Information Technology Automated Emblem Supplies, Inc. 61 Green Street Foxboro, MA 02035-2865 Phone: (508) 543-6511 Ext. 109 Fax: (508) 543-6512 -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Allowing access for Free utility called click yes will do this for you. You can find this and other utilities at Slipstick. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing access for Hi guys, I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from a folder. Only problem is that Outlook 2000 (SR2) only gives me the options of allowing this program access to the folder for one minute, two minutes, 5 minutes or 10 minutes. I would like to set this thing to run overnight, so I'd like, maybe, a 10 hour option? Is there any way of changing the value of these options? I checked the registry and the MSKB, but didn't find anything off the bat. Thanks, Evan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Allowing access for....
S... It's for virus propagation then. Good to know. Ick! From the website quote Express ClickYes is a tiny program that sits in the System Tray and clicks the Yes button on behalf of you, when Outlook's Security Guard opens prompt dialog saying that a program is trying to send an email with Outlook or access its address book. /quote -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for LOL. There is actually a utility called ClickYes. http://www.express-soft.com/mailmate/clickyes.html Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for Okay, I'm feeling totally dense... was I just had? g Is there such a utility, or are you just tell me to click yes every 10 minutes when it asks??? :) Sorry.. had a very bad couple of weeks and my mind is fried. Thanks, Evan _ Evan A. Brastow Director of Information Technology Automated Emblem Supplies, Inc. 61 Green Street Foxboro, MA 02035-2865 Phone: (508) 543-6511 Ext. 109 Fax: (508) 543-6512 -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Allowing access for Free utility called click yes will do this for you. You can find this and other utilities at Slipstick. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing access for Hi guys, I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from a folder. Only problem is that Outlook 2000 (SR2) only gives me the options of allowing this program access to the folder for one minute, two minutes, 5 minutes or 10 minutes. I would like to set this thing to run overnight, so I'd like, maybe, a 10 hour option? Is there any way of changing the value of these options? I checked the registry and the MSKB, but didn't find anything off the bat. Thanks, Evan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Allowing access for....
I've yet to come across a virus that was stopped because OutLook would not allow access. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for S... It's for virus propagation then. Good to know. Ick! From the website quote Express ClickYes is a tiny program that sits in the System Tray and clicks the Yes button on behalf of you, when Outlook's Security Guard opens prompt dialog saying that a program is trying to send an email with Outlook or access its address book. /quote -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for LOL. There is actually a utility called ClickYes. http://www.express-soft.com/mailmate/clickyes.html Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for Okay, I'm feeling totally dense... was I just had? g Is there such a utility, or are you just tell me to click yes every 10 minutes when it asks??? :) Sorry.. had a very bad couple of weeks and my mind is fried. Thanks, Evan _ Evan A. Brastow Director of Information Technology Automated Emblem Supplies, Inc. 61 Green Street Foxboro, MA 02035-2865 Phone: (508) 543-6511 Ext. 109 Fax: (508) 543-6512 -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Allowing access for Free utility called click yes will do this for you. You can find this and other utilities at Slipstick. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing access for Hi guys, I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from a folder. Only problem is that Outlook 2000 (SR2) only gives me the options of allowing this program access to the folder for one minute, two minutes, 5 minutes or 10 minutes. I would like to set this thing to run overnight, so I'd like, maybe, a 10 hour option? Is there any way of changing the value of these options? I checked the registry and the MSKB, but didn't find anything off the bat. Thanks, Evan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Allowing access for....
Well, there is that :) -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for I've yet to come across a virus that was stopped because OutLook would not allow access. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for S... It's for virus propagation then. Good to know. Ick! From the website quote Express ClickYes is a tiny program that sits in the System Tray and clicks the Yes button on behalf of you, when Outlook's Security Guard opens prompt dialog saying that a program is trying to send an email with Outlook or access its address book. /quote -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for LOL. There is actually a utility called ClickYes. http://www.express-soft.com/mailmate/clickyes.html Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Allowing access for Okay, I'm feeling totally dense... was I just had? g Is there such a utility, or are you just tell me to click yes every 10 minutes when it asks??? :) Sorry.. had a very bad couple of weeks and my mind is fried. Thanks, Evan _ Evan A. Brastow Director of Information Technology Automated Emblem Supplies, Inc. 61 Green Street Foxboro, MA 02035-2865 Phone: (508) 543-6511 Ext. 109 Fax: (508) 543-6512 -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Allowing access for Free utility called click yes will do this for you. You can find this and other utilities at Slipstick. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing access for Hi guys, I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from a folder. Only problem is that Outlook 2000 (SR2) only gives me the options of allowing this program access to the folder for one minute, two minutes, 5 minutes or 10 minutes. I would like to set this thing to run overnight, so I'd like, maybe, a 10 hour option? Is there any way of changing the value of these options? I checked the registry and the MSKB, but didn't find anything off the bat. Thanks, Evan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5
Title: RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Matthew, Windows NT networks will try querying an DNS server before trying WINS, by default. See MS article Q172218, for further explanation. Don Guyer Information Systems Citadel Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 www.citadelfcu.org -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Outlook name resolution. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Can anyone elaborate on how that works on an NT 4 domain? WINS is correct and a conflicting DNS entry is there? Why does DNS take precedence on an NT4 domain? I thought that was a 2K thing??? (I am sending this to the NT list so stop barking) - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Well I found something. There was still a DNS entry for the old IP address. I originally intended to make it separate and make it mail2 or something similar in DNS. I removed the entry and it has cleared most of my problems. - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: Note on moving Exch 5.5 As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past weekend. A note on a blip I experienced: I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the old server's IP (I gave the old one a completely different IP) after moving mailboxes so that I would not have to mess with router settings and such for the NAT. It worked fine, because the DNS was still correct, mail came through, etc. On Monday, when people started Outlook and it looked for the new mail server, some users had issues with the new IP. They were trying to resolve to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the old POC. A well meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS entry for the server (GOD NOO). Bad form, but it worked at that moment, which is all users seem to care about. I plan to go back and fix this issue when things settle down. I just wanted to bring this up for posterity's sake. *wink List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5
NT networks typically will use NetBIOS over TCP/IP for name resolution, i.e. WINS before DNS. That article refers to host name resolution (Hosts, DNS etc... before WINS) which *Outlook* as well as other applications will use to resolve. -Original Message- From: Don Guyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Matthew, Windows NT networks will try querying an DNS server before trying WINS, by default. See MS article Q172218, for further explanation. Don Guyer Information Systems Citadel Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 www.citadelfcu.org -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Outlook name resolution. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Can anyone elaborate on how that works on an NT 4 domain? WINS is correct and a conflicting DNS entry is there? Why does DNS take precedence on an NT4 domain? I thought that was a 2K thing??? (I am sending this to the NT list so stop barking) - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Well I found something. There was still a DNS entry for the old IP address. I originally intended to make it separate and make it mail2 or something similar in DNS. I removed the entry and it has cleared most of my problems. - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: Note on moving Exch 5.5 As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past weekend. A note on a blip I experienced: I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the old server's IP (I gave the old one a completely different IP) after moving mailboxes so that I would not have to mess with router settings and such for the NAT. It worked fine, because the DNS was still correct, mail came through, etc. On Monday, when people started Outlook and it looked for the new mail server, some users had issues with the new IP. They were trying to resolve to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the old POC. A well meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS entry for the server (GOD NOO). Bad form, but it worked at that moment, which is all users seem to care about. I plan to go back and fix this issue when things settle down. I just wanted to bring this up for posterity's sake. *wink List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
I'm not helping, you guys raised stamp prices again -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
Stamp, mail? What are they? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem I'm not helping, you guys raised stamp prices again -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
Ahhhaaa, Steve Clark appears to be the reason for a 1.6 billion dollar loss for the postal service. Busted! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Stamp, mail? What are they? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem I'm not helping, you guys raised stamp prices again -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
Is the account being stamped by the RUS? Typically this has to happen before the account shows up in the GAL which is required before Outlook can resolve the name. Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
Bahaha, that's right they did raise prices :-) however, I am just a lowly sub contractor :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:21 PM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem I'm not helping, you guys raised stamp prices again -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
Porn mail seems to be a bit low these days. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Ahhhaaa, Steve Clark appears to be the reason for a 1.6 billion dollar loss for the postal service. Busted! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Stamp, mail? What are they? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem I'm not helping, you guys raised stamp prices again -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
Yes, RUS is stamping it. We actually found a q article that stated a reg fix that will fix a screw up the security roll up did. The keeper of the GC's int hat domain will do this and then let us know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:30 PM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Is the account being stamped by the RUS? Typically this has to happen before the account shows up in the GAL which is required before Outlook can resolve the name. Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Blocked Attachment
Does anyone know why, or how to change the setting in outlook/exchange 5.5 from blocking .com and .exe attachments? Thanks All List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
How about posing the Q number ? :) -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Yes, RUS is stamping it. We actually found a q article that stated a reg fix that will fix a screw up the security roll up did. The keeper of the GC's int hat domain will do this and then let us know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:30 PM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Is the account being stamped by the RUS? Typically this has to happen before the account shows up in the GAL which is required before Outlook can resolve the name. Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Blocked Attachment
Exchange 5.5 doesn't block attachments...you either are blocking at the client, or using an antivirus for exchange that is blocking...Outlook XP will block and I use a tool like detachxp.exe to change these settings in outlook. Steve -Original Message- From: Gary Wheaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocked Attachment Does anyone know why, or how to change the setting in outlook/exchange 5.5 from blocking .com and .exe attachments? Thanks All List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Blocked Attachment
Assuming that you're talking about the Outlook Security Update: Q262631 Jim Busick Database Network Analyst, MCSE Santee School District -Original Message- From: Gary Wheaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocked Attachment Does anyone know why, or how to change the setting in outlook/exchange 5.5 from blocking .com and .exe attachments? Thanks All List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
HAVE TO RUN~!!
I have to run all. It is flooding here!! I have had 13 inches of rain at home since Friday. They are sending everyone here home early. Have a good one til tomorrow List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Blocked Attachment
There is a little app that can change that. I will look, I have it here, but it is not a good idea to stop the block really - Original Message - From: Jim Busick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:55 PM Subject: RE: Blocked Attachment Assuming that you're talking about the Outlook Security Update: Q262631 Jim Busick Database Network Analyst, MCSE Santee School District -Original Message- From: Gary Wheaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocked Attachment Does anyone know why, or how to change the setting in outlook/exchange 5.5 from blocking .com and .exe attachments? Thanks All List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Blocked Attachment
I thought you had to run? What about all that water? GO MAN! -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Blocked Attachment There is a little app that can change that. I will look, I have it here, but it is not a good idea to stop the block really - Original Message - From: Jim Busick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:55 PM Subject: RE: Blocked Attachment Assuming that you're talking about the Outlook Security Update: Q262631 Jim Busick Database Network Analyst, MCSE Santee School District -Original Message- From: Gary Wheaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocked Attachment Does anyone know why, or how to change the setting in outlook/exchange 5.5 from blocking .com and .exe attachments? Thanks All List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem
Once you had your exchange 2000 server installed in your dev domain did you ever reboot your global catalog server(s)? I had some very similar issues until I figured out that the NSPI addition to the global catalog servers required a reboot. Technet article q256976 was helpful to me (describes how mapi clients access AD) Clyde Burns my $0.37 worth. - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:25 PM Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Ahhhaaa, Steve Clark appears to be the reason for a 1.6 billion dollar loss for the postal service. Busted! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Stamp, mail? What are they? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem I'm not helping, you guys raised stamp prices again -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange/Outlook Resolution problem Here is one that will stump even the best of you (although I kind of hope it doesn't). Here is our situation - we have a development 2000 domain with an exchange 2000 server in it, basically all for testing and staging build tests. We are trying to test a blackberry server build from start to finish. One of the things blackberry depends on is using an outlook profile to attach to exchange. The only problem is - we cannot resolve any user we create in AD and generate an email address for. The email address gets generated, it propagates and all is good. However, when trying to attach to that profile (resolve it from the outlook client) it says it cannot resolve. 1) It appears the servers are talking to the GC's. 2) We are able to ping the NetBIOS name. 3) Even directly on the exchange server with a client installed, it gets the same error 4) The first exchange server has been ripped out and reinstalled many times already (my theory is this is the problem) What I am asking is if anyone ever heard of such a problem and what you guys suggest. Thanks!!! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Blocked Attachment
Hey Gary - There are all sorts of applications that you can install at the client level that will remove all the security blocking. Take a gander at Slipstick - there are quite a few. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Gary Wheaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocked Attachment Does anyone know why, or how to change the setting in outlook/exchange 5.5 from blocking .com and .exe attachments? Thanks All List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Blocked Attachment
I think the best work around is to rename the extension. Safer that way.. Hey Steve, need any work done on the west cost? Talk soon -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocked Attachment Hey Gary - There are all sorts of applications that you can install at the client level that will remove all the security blocking. Take a gander at Slipstick - there are quite a few. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Gary Wheaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocked Attachment Does anyone know why, or how to change the setting in outlook/exchange 5.5 from blocking .com and .exe attachments? Thanks All List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: HAVE TO RUN~!!
Don't drown ! -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 4:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: HAVE TO RUN~!! I have to run all. It is flooding here!! I have had 13 inches of rain at home since Friday. They are sending everyone here home early. Have a good one til tomorrow List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
McAfee The final Results.
Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Attachments and Exchange
Is this link dead? Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments and Exchange http://www.praetor.net this thing should do it. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments and Exchange Yes.. It starts with a P... Let me go find it. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments and Exchange I remember a product from a few years ago that would take all incoming attachments on Exchange and strip them from the mail, then store them elsewhere while still making them available to the user as if they were in the DB. I can't find it now. Does anyone remember this tool? MailEssentials will strip them, but I don't think it allows the user to retrieve them as if they are still in the DB. J List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
I have seen the exact same results when moving from McAfee to OfficeScan and have seen similar but not as bad when moving from Norton to OfficeScan. The worst is when you see it is a computer that has been troublesome but never able to diagnose correctly. Good job on the move~ -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Maximum suckyness level. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Yea I have to ask that question too just cause. I know the default is programs only. But hopefully this fall I am moveing away from mcafee to one of the two that most people mention for exchange. BWT which is better trend or antigen? dave -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail Content Filtering Recommendations
Is this link dead? Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: E-mail Content Filtering Recommendations Praetor, I love it www.cmsconnect.com - Original Message - From: Paul Mullis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:04 AM Subject: E-mail Content Filtering Recommendations We are about to deploy Exchange 2000 and I would like to get some recommendations for content filtering products in order to help cut down on spam. I'm not sure if it matters, but we will be using Trend Micro's NeatSuite for virus protection. We are a fairly small firm (50 people), but the President of the company has begun receiving a lot of spam so I'm trying to find options. I would like to find something reasonably inexpensive. Thanks for the help Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Toggling the RUS through scripting?
Is there a way to toggle the RUS on multiple accounts through scripting? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Heheheh you don't really want to agitate the masses do you? ANTIGEN ANTIGEN ANTIGEN ANTIGEN... Preston Jeffares - Antigen Cult Member Since 2000 Network Engineer Georgia Department of Motor Vehicle Safety [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Yea I have to ask that question too just cause. I know the default is programs only. But hopefully this fall I am moveing away from mcafee to one of the two that most people mention for exchange. BWT which is better trend or antigen? dave -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
I can't speak for Trend, but I just installed Antigen last night. The installation was relatively painless, the file extensions to block have to be entered manually one by one, the auto update for the sigs works great, their support people so far have been very good, the subject line content filter works well but is very particular, it uses, in my case four different virus engines and it makes me coffee in the morning. OK. So it really doesn't make me coffee. The bad news is I'm having an issue with end users not receiving notifications of virus laden emails. Antigen is catching them and stripping the infected attachments but not notifying the recipients. I need to rename some Antigen .adb files then stop and start all services. Then enter all my file extensions by hand again (by the way, thank you Martin for the list). Guess who's going in real real early tomorrow. Steve -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Yea I have to ask that question too just cause. I know the default is programs only. But hopefully this fall I am moveing away from mcafee to one of the two that most people mention for exchange. BWT which is better trend or antigen? dave -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Hey, it's better than Norton. That one swallows. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Maximum suckyness level. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Personally I use Trend. I have always had excellent experiences with it. I demo'd anitgen and while it is a great program, I found the interface to be kludgy. Also the fact that I have to enter the file extensions one at a time did not please me. Frankly, both are excellent products and you cant go wrong with eihter. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Antigen. No comments from AB on this. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Yea I have to ask that question too just cause. I know the default is programs only. But hopefully this fall I am moveing away from mcafee to one of the two that most people mention for exchange. BWT which is better trend or antigen? dave -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
can you buy trend from any software var (insight,cdw)? what sort of pricing structure can you get. I have about 600 mailboxes. I like stirring up this nest because it makes my job easier to go upwards and get the ok to change from groupshield. dave -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Personally I use Trend. I have always had excellent experiences with it. I demo'd anitgen and while it is a great program, I found the interface to be kludgy. Also the fact that I have to enter the file extensions one at a time did not please me. Frankly, both are excellent products and you cant go wrong with eihter. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Antigen. No comments from AB on this. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Yea I have to ask that question too just cause. I know the default is programs only. But hopefully this fall I am moveing away from mcafee to one of the two that most people mention for exchange. BWT which is better trend or antigen? dave -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Title: RE: McAfee The final Results. I can't speak for or against Trend as I've never used it. OTOH, I installed Antigen a year and a half ago and I've loved it. To my knowledge, we haven't recieved a single virus through company email since. The only thing I would change is that I wish files were scanned for viruses before they were filtered by attachment type. I filter all executables and Antigen doesn't give me a quick way to determine if a file is a clean executable or a virus. Steve -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Yea I have to ask that question too just cause. I know the default is programs only. But hopefully this fall I am moveing away from mcafee to one of the two that most people mention for exchange. BWT which is better trend or antigen? dave -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Title: Message Trend is the same -Original Message-From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: McAfee The final Results. I can't speak for or against Trend as I've never used it. OTOH, I installed Antigen a year and a half ago and I've loved it. To my knowledge, we haven't recieved a single virus through company email since. The only thing I would change is that I wish files were scanned for viruses before they were filtered by attachment type. I filter all executables and Antigen doesn't give me a quick way to determine if a file is a clean executable or a virus. Steve -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Yea I have to ask that question too just cause. I know the default is programs only. But hopefully this fall I am moveing away from mcafee to one of the two that most people mention for exchange. BWT which is better trend or antigen? dave -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Oh sorry... let me send you some more encouragement... In almost 3 years of Antigen... not one virus has made it through. -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Heheheh you don't really want to agitate the masses do you? ANTIGEN ANTIGEN ANTIGEN ANTIGEN... Preston Jeffares - Antigen Cult Member Since 2000 Network Engineer Georgia Department of Motor Vehicle Safety [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Yea I have to ask that question too just cause. I know the default is programs only. But hopefully this fall I am moveing away from mcafee to one of the two that most people mention for exchange. BWT which is better trend or antigen? dave -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Even though I have heard these sort of anecdotal stories for years about McCrappy, I have never doubted any of them. Welcome to the world du protection! -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message Yeah Well, most of us don't recommend SBS on anything... -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
.net questions
Situation: Our web committie (i am not involved) meet and decided there was no need to go to .net for web at this time, becuase they could do everything they needed to with out it. not that great, can do the same stuff myself no-tech manager a then went to non-tech higher up b (my boss's boss) and said what! we need to go to .net, as MS says it is the next best thing! non-tech higher up b (my boss's boss) said to my boss what is up with .net and why aren't we going to it? MS is advertizing it all over the place! we need to get it! my boss said - Find OUT what is going on! I went to technet and MS and now the lists. Per MS it is a XML web serivce which somehow has serversMS site was not clear on how it worked. The Technet article were better on told me that .net is a programming framework to link web and traditional server systems together to enable better flow of information. Am I correct in my undertsanding? Is .net server a true NOS based or is is just web services? My undertanding is that it is not offically released yet, is that correct? Is anyone beta testing it? If so what problems have they found with Exchange and Terminal services? I thought I read from one of my lists that there were issues with exchange?? Who is planning on going to it? Thanks For Your Help. Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Tech CCBC - Catonsville List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Looking for an 'add to contacts' tool
Is anyone familiar with a homemade script, or a third party solution to add an email address to the contact list in Outlook Web Access? I would like to be able to open an email in OWA and click on an 'add to contacts' button much like I can in Outlook proper. Any suggestions? Thanks, John Glass List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: .net questions
Funny, just got out of a meeting with MS about .net. I would suggest getting your MS rep out there to the developers and infrastructure groups to see what .net provides for both areas. Your basically looking at XML Web Services that will allow you Rapid Application Development and cross platform communication. There are four parts to .net: Clients, Servers, XML Web Services and Developer tools We just got the developer pitch today (kind of understood what was going on) and will get the infrastructure part later (my area). But .net as far as I can figure is a family of development and server products. Exchange 2000 is one of the .net applications but I don't think Terminal Services really changes much between Win2K and .net servers. Biztalk Server, Share Point Portal Server, Exchange 2000, SQL 2000, etc. are all part of the 12 server products that will be available. There are also the development platforms Visual Studio .net, etc. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: .net questions Situation: Our web committie (i am not involved) meet and decided there was no need to go to .net for web at this time, becuase they could do everything they needed to with out it. not that great, can do the same stuff myself no-tech manager a then went to non-tech higher up b (my boss's boss) and said what! we need to go to .net, as MS says it is the next best thing! non-tech higher up b (my boss's boss) said to my boss what is up with .net and why aren't we going to it? MS is advertizing it all over the place! we need to get it! my boss said - Find OUT what is going on! I went to technet and MS and now the lists. Per MS it is a XML web serivce which somehow has serversMS site was not clear on how it worked. The Technet article were better on told me that .net is a programming framework to link web and traditional server systems together to enable better flow of information. Am I correct in my undertsanding? Is .net server a true NOS based or is is just web services? My undertanding is that it is not offically released yet, is that correct? Is anyone beta testing it? If so what problems have they found with Exchange and Terminal services? I thought I read from one of my lists that there were issues with exchange?? Who is planning on going to it? Thanks For Your Help. Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Tech CCBC - Catonsville List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: .net questions
It sounds like what her group was discussing was the .NET development platform (ASPX, C#, VB.NET, etc). At this time, its easy to confuse the two (dev vs. server). Frankly, I left it up to our developers to decide. All they needed from me was to upgrade the MDAC and install .NET Framework on the servers -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: .net questions Funny, just got out of a meeting with MS about .net. I would suggest getting your MS rep out there to the developers and infrastructure groups to see what .net provides for both areas. Your basically looking at XML Web Services that will allow you Rapid Application Development and cross platform communication. There are four parts to .net: Clients, Servers, XML Web Services and Developer tools We just got the developer pitch today (kind of understood what was going on) and will get the infrastructure part later (my area). But .net as far as I can figure is a family of development and server products. Exchange 2000 is one of the .net applications but I don't think Terminal Services really changes much between Win2K and .net servers. Biztalk Server, Share Point Portal Server, Exchange 2000, SQL 2000, etc. are all part of the 12 server products that will be available. There are also the development platforms Visual Studio .net, etc. Ken --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills -Original Message- From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: .net questions Situation: Our web committie (i am not involved) meet and decided there was no need to go to .net for web at this time, becuase they could do everything they needed to with out it. not that great, can do the same stuff myself no-tech manager a then went to non-tech higher up b (my boss's boss) and said what! we need to go to .net, as MS says it is the next best thing! non-tech higher up b (my boss's boss) said to my boss what is up with .net and why aren't we going to it? MS is advertizing it all over the place! we need to get it! my boss said - Find OUT what is going on! I went to technet and MS and now the lists. Per MS it is a XML web serivce which somehow has serversMS site was not clear on how it worked. The Technet article were better on told me that .net is a programming framework to link web and traditional server systems together to enable better flow of information. Am I correct in my undertsanding? Is .net server a true NOS based or is is just web services? My undertanding is that it is not offically released yet, is that correct? Is anyone beta testing it? If so what problems have they found with Exchange and Terminal services? I thought I read from one of my lists that there were issues with exchange?? Who is planning on going to it? Thanks For Your Help. Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Tech CCBC - Catonsville List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: McAfee The final Results.
Antigen is the bomb!! Just install it and take it easy. -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Oh sorry... let me send you some more encouragement... In almost 3 years of Antigen... not one virus has made it through. -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Heheheh you don't really want to agitate the masses do you? ANTIGEN ANTIGEN ANTIGEN ANTIGEN... Preston Jeffares - Antigen Cult Member Since 2000 Network Engineer Georgia Department of Motor Vehicle Safety [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Yea I have to ask that question too just cause. I know the default is programs only. But hopefully this fall I am moveing away from mcafee to one of the two that most people mention for exchange. BWT which is better trend or antigen? dave -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. Was McAfee set to scan all files on the PC originally before the move? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee The final Results. Well I just got done replacing McAfee VirusScan with Trend OfficeScan on all my desktops, and I thought I would post the results here. Trend found 22 out of 84 computers had a virus on them despite having VirusScan with up to date (4209) data files installed on them. They were all set up to check for new dats automatically. Most had multiple infections, with one even having 6 different viruses on it. 90 percent of the viruses were Outlook based email viruses that somehow got through GroupShield, and VirusScan! I even saw several infections from KLEZ, and supposedly you didn't even have to be up to date on your DAT fields for VirusScan to clean that one. I just thought that this info was worth putting out there for those using or thinking of using VirusScan. John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: .net questions
I run a Windows.Net Active Directory domain with beta3 release 3268. And on a dev box I have VisualStudio.Net. .Net is both a development platform and a name given the next version of Windows. William -Original Message- From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: .net questions Situation: Our web committie (i am not involved) meet and decided there was no need to go to .net for web at this time, becuase they could do everything they needed to with out it. not that great, can do the same stuff myself no-tech manager a then went to non-tech higher up b (my boss's boss) and said what! we need to go to .net, as MS says it is the next best thing! non-tech higher up b (my boss's boss) said to my boss what is up with .net and why aren't we going to it? MS is advertizing it all over the place! we need to get it! my boss said - Find OUT what is going on! I went to technet and MS and now the lists. Per MS it is a XML web serivce which somehow has serversMS site was not clear on how it worked. The Technet article were better on told me that .net is a programming framework to link web and traditional server systems together to enable better flow of information. Am I correct in my undertsanding? Is .net server a true NOS based or is is just web services? My undertanding is that it is not offically released yet, is that correct? Is anyone beta testing it? If so what problems have they found with Exchange and Terminal services? I thought I read from one of my lists that there were issues with exchange?? Who is planning on going to it? Thanks For Your Help. Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Tech CCBC - Catonsville List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: .net questions
Try this link for some pretty fair information: http://arstechnica.com/paedia/n/net/net-1.html | -Original Message- | From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 17:00 | To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues | Subject: .net questions | | | Situation: | | Our web committie (i am not involved) meet and decided there | was no need to | go to .net for web at this time, becuase they could do everything they | needed to with out it. not that great, can do the same stuff myself | | no-tech manager a then went to non-tech higher up b (my | boss's boss) and | said what! we need to go to .net, as MS says it is the next | best thing! | | non-tech higher up b (my boss's boss) said to my boss what | is up with | .net and why aren't we going to it? MS is advertizing it all | over the place! | we need to get it! | | my boss said - Find OUT what is going on! | | I went to technet and MS and now the lists. | | Per MS it is a XML web serivce which somehow has | serversMS site was not | clear on how it worked. The Technet article were better on | told me that .net | is a programming framework to link web and traditional | server systems | together to enable better flow of information. | | Am I correct in my undertsanding? | | Is .net server a true NOS based or is is just web services? | | My undertanding is that it is not offically released yet, is | that correct? | | Is anyone beta testing it? If so what problems have they | found with Exchange | and Terminal services? I thought I read from one of my lists | that there were | issues with exchange?? | | | Who is planning on going to it? | | | Thanks For Your Help. | | Elizabeth Thompson | Service and Support Tech | CCBC - Catonsville | | List Charter and FAQ at: | http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm | | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: .net questions
I'm running 3206 in a test environment and its running okay. Found out the hard way that e2k doesn't work on it, and the RDP5.1 isn't implemented correctly. (Cant connect to it via WinXP using rdp5.1). The server has 3 version on it, standard server, web server, and enterprise server if I remember correctly. The web server had everything web on it, for add/remove users and basically all admin tools were in the browser (like the admin web site, but much more). The other two seem to run pretty nice. Our 3206 is running AD , DNS, DHCP, and PoP3 mail services, oh yah and the new sharepoint on it is much nicer. Hey William is that new build on the msdn? I didn't see it .. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Blocked Attachment
Change the registry on the local pc, or you can do the server side fix as well, which was like putting a rule in the public folders. Check mskb. TweakXP can make the registry changes for you automatically, or just enter them in. -Original Message- From: Gary Wheaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 4:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocked Attachment I think the best work around is to rename the extension. Safer that way.. Hey Steve, need any work done on the west cost? Talk soon -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blocked Attachment Hey Gary - There are all sorts of applications that you can install at the client level that will remove all the security blocking. Take a gander at Slipstick - there are quite a few. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Gary Wheaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocked Attachment Does anyone know why, or how to change the setting in outlook/exchange 5.5 from blocking .com and .exe attachments? Thanks All List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Problem with AD integration
Title: Message Did you make it a mail-enabled group? -Original Message-From: Jason Tilley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Problem with AD integration I have a new E2K Server that I just installed on my W2K native mode Network. I am having issues with Universal Distribution lists. I have one setup called IT Department that does not seem to be replicating properly. When I connect to the Exchange Admin, I can see the Group there, but when I use outlook 2002 I cannot see this group in the list, instead I still see the old CIS Department gropup that had been setup previously. Any ideas? Jason Tilley Network Development Picatinny Federal Credit Union 100 Mineral Springs Drive Dover, NJ 07801 (973) 361 - 5225 x 203 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Active Directory and Exchange 5.5
Tony, without the ADC you do not have synch between the 5.5 database and the AD database. You have to manually go in and add mailboxes to users, and users to mailboxes. Then if you make a change on the AD you have to go into 5.5 and reassign the owner. Stuff like that. Also making new users without the AD wont populate the 55 db, so again you create 50 users in AD, then you create 50 mailboxes, then associate those 50 mailboxes to each user one at a time. Trust me, use the adc :) -Original Message- From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Active Directory and Exchange 5.5 Hi, I've been asked to upgrade our Windows NT4 domain to Active Directory. We are currently using Exchange 5.5, and I would hope to move to Exchange 2000 in due course. However, I think upgrading both at the same time may be a bit too much work. Is it possible to continue running Exchange 5.5 with all the users being in AD ? Is the AD connector essential in these circumstances. I played with this scenario in a test environment, and after upgrading the domain, I was still able to access Exchange without installing the AD connector. I was under the impression that AD connector HAD to be used after upgrading. My AD domain name and NT domain names were the same, ie. DOMAINNAME became DOMAINNAME.AD. I'm a bit confused as to the role of the AD connector in this scenario. Thanks, Tony. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: .net questions
Not William but going to reply inline... -Original Message- I'm running 3206 in a test environment and its running okay. Found out the hard way that e2k doesn't work on it and the RDP5.1 isn't implemented correctly. (Cant connect to it via WinXP using rdp5.1). I'd double check your config then. I've been using Win.NET Server since 3604 and am now running 3628 and I never had any issues using Win.XP to connect via RDP to the Win.NET box. oh yah and the new sharepoint on it is much nicer. I assume you refer to Sharepoint Team Services which are removed in later builds. Hey William is that new build on the msdn? I didn't see it .. Nope. Build 3628 (which William I believe refers to) is only for beta testers. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5
But are the workstations NT? I believe a 2000 workstation hits DNS first then WINS. It's not a network thing it's a workstation thing. I believe you can also alter the order by making a few reg edits. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5 NT networks typically will use NetBIOS over TCP/IP for name resolution, i.e. WINS before DNS. That article refers to host name resolution (Hosts, DNS etc... before WINS) which *Outlook* as well as other applications will use to resolve. -Original Message- From: Don Guyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Matthew, Windows NT networks will try querying an DNS server before trying WINS, by default. See MS article Q172218, for further explanation. Don Guyer Information Systems Citadel Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 www.citadelfcu.org -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Outlook name resolution. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Can anyone elaborate on how that works on an NT 4 domain? WINS is correct and a conflicting DNS entry is there? Why does DNS take precedence on an NT4 domain? I thought that was a 2K thing??? (I am sending this to the NT list so stop barking) - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Well I found something. There was still a DNS entry for the old IP address. I originally intended to make it separate and make it mail2 or something similar in DNS. I removed the entry and it has cleared most of my problems. - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: Note on moving Exch 5.5 As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past weekend. A note on a blip I experienced: I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the old server's IP (I gave the old one a completely different IP) after moving mailboxes so that I would not have to mess with router settings and such for the NAT. It worked fine, because the DNS was still correct, mail came through, etc. On Monday, when people started Outlook and it looked for the new mail server, some users had issues with the new IP. They were trying to resolve to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the old POC. A well meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS entry for the server (GOD NOO). Bad form, but it worked at that moment, which is all users seem to care about. I plan to go back and fix this issue when things settle down. I just wanted to bring this up for posterity's sake. *wink List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL
Re: .net questions
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, at 8:00pm, Thompson, Elizabeth wrote: Is .net server a true NOS based or is is just web services? .NET has at least two meanings: In one sense, .NET is just the latest thing Microsoft is using instead of a version number. We had Windows 95, 98, 2000, ME, XP, and now .NET. Likewise Office, SQL Server, Exchange, and so on. Ho-hum, marketing strikes again. In another sense, .NET is a software environment. .NET combines a number of tools and technologies to give developers an application framework to develop software in, and users to run it in. Microsoft says it will let you develop software faster, make it run better, eliminate backwards compatibility problems, make everything platform independent, and create world peace. ;-) I expect reality to be something less then that. The two means of .NET do not necessarily have anything to do with each other. Sure, Windows.NET is supposed to be Windows re-implemented on .NET, but software release schedules being what they are, it would not surprise me to see that pushed off into the next release. :) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: .net questions
Note that Windows XP and Windows.NET will coexist for quite some time. Windows XP = Client OS Windows.NET = Server OS Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 3:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: .net questions On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, at 8:00pm, Thompson, Elizabeth wrote: Is .net server a true NOS based or is is just web services? .NET has at least two meanings: In one sense, .NET is just the latest thing Microsoft is using instead of a version number. We had Windows 95, 98, 2000, ME, XP, and now .NET. Likewise Office, SQL Server, Exchange, and so on. Ho-hum, marketing strikes again. In another sense, .NET is a software environment. .NET combines a number of tools and technologies to give developers an application framework to develop software in, and users to run it in. Microsoft says it will let you develop software faster, make it run better, eliminate backwards compatibility problems, make everything platform independent, and create world peace. ;-) I expect reality to be something less then that. The two means of .NET do not necessarily have anything to do with each other. Sure, Windows.NET is supposed to be Windows re-implemented on .NET, but software release schedules being what they are, it would not surprise me to see that pushed off into the next release. :) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange on DC?
Title: Message On good hardware, what are50 users going to do? SBS leaves a lot to be desired. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange on DC? i don't see how its not recommended, this is what they do in the SBS 2000 product. Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide thanks John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for it. -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference guide Tony Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by Digital Press. Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and "Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press as well. John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Reference guide Look out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet) I'm ready to purchase a book!!! Ok, So does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server guide? TIA jim with cashList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: .net questions
Oops... Yes, 3628 not 3268. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: .net questions Not William but going to reply inline... -Original Message- I'm running 3206 in a test environment and its running okay. Found out the hard way that e2k doesn't work on it and the RDP5.1 isn't implemented correctly. (Cant connect to it via WinXP using rdp5.1). I'd double check your config then. I've been using Win.NET Server since 3604 and am now running 3628 and I never had any issues using Win.XP to connect via RDP to the Win.NET box. oh yah and the new sharepoint on it is much nicer. I assume you refer to Sharepoint Team Services which are removed in later builds. Hey William is that new build on the msdn? I didn't see it .. Nope. Build 3628 (which William I believe refers to) is only for beta testers. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: .net questions
I thought that's what you meant, I have 3602, but I knew you had the newer one and mine was 06. heeh .. Siegfried - A bunch of us went through this before, and I know some people said there's works, but mine never worked, with or without a domain or AD. I even tried joining the domain from an xp box and then doing it, I got an error every time. Being fairly proficient in RDP TS (manage about 12 servers @ 250 users) I felt I had it all setup correctly just for a basic connection from an admin acct. Oh well, looking forward to the new build.. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: .net questions Oops... Yes, 3628 not 3268. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: .net questions Not William but going to reply inline... -Original Message- I'm running 3206 in a test environment and its running okay. Found out the hard way that e2k doesn't work on it and the RDP5.1 isn't implemented correctly. (Cant connect to it via WinXP using rdp5.1). I'd double check your config then. I've been using Win.NET Server since 3604 and am now running 3628 and I never had any issues using Win.XP to connect via RDP to the Win.NET box. oh yah and the new sharepoint on it is much nicer. I assume you refer to Sharepoint Team Services which are removed in later builds. Hey William is that new build on the msdn? I didn't see it .. Nope. Build 3628 (which William I believe refers to) is only for beta testers. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5
Don't forget that old NetBIOS node type in DHCP. P-node, M-node .. or whatever it was to tell the dhcp client which order to process requests. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange and Remote Exchange?
Title: Message I don't think it can be done, your best bet would be to backup offsite then and have the ability to restore. Geocluster was a product we were reviewing last year I know Sunbelt uses it, but at the time I don't think it handled exchange. -Original Message-From: Exchange - Sunbelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange and Remote Exchange? I've gotten conflicting responses from several peers around me and so I want to pose the same question to y'all. I have this idea: We have a network with a e2k server. It is where all the mail comes in/etc...I would like for disaster recovery purposes to connect a vpn to the network. At the other end of this VPN at a remote location would be another server - E2k. I would like the internal server to replicate itself and all messages/etc to the remote server. This could be done in real time or just once in the evenings. Is this possible? I was told it would be like a front end/back end and the remote server would only have 'shortcuts' pointing to the message on the main server. I would not want the remote server to handle incoming user requests due to bandwidth constraints on VPNs (ie perhaps more cost). In case of disaster and the main e2k blows up, I would want the remote server to be ABLE to take over (I realize I would need to setup / route IP etc). =20 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
