RE: Removing ADC from E2k3 org
Just do it... It is much less scary that it sounds!! ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Removing ADC from E2k3 org All, I'm trying to follow http://support.microsoft.com/kb/272314/es to remove the ADC, and am not getting exactly the results I'd like to see. Step 5 says: Under System Folders, click to expand Offline Address Book to select the Offline Address Book (OAB). The OAB should be of the form EX:/O=ORG/OU=Site Right click the folder and click Properties, then click the Replication tab. When I right-click for properties, I get a popup that says: --Begin popup text-- The mail proxy for this folder cannot be found. This may be due to replication delays. The mail enabled pages will not be shown. ID no: 1038a21 Exchange System Manager ---End popup text-- I've found this article, which seems to address my situation: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328740 My question is: Has anyone here done this, and what might be the gotchas in doing either of the procedures outlined? I'm guessing that the first procedure is the one that applies to my situation, because I've recently decommissioned my last Ex5.5 server, but have not yet removed the ADC. This article makes me a bit nervous, though, so I'm looking for a bit of guidance before I step off the cliff. Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
Paul did a brilliant write up on the iphone and how well it plays with activesnyc. http://www.robichaux.net/blog/2008/07/the-iphone-as-a-mail-device.php ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 7:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I have 1 users asking what happens if he replaces his BB with an iPhone? I'm on the BES server and I assume I delete him on the BES server but what do I need to do on the E2K3? Simply turn on Active Sync? __ Stefan Jafs This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
YEAH!!! Behold the power of great review!!! ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Priceless... A CEO hands me an Iphone 15 mins ago, I hand him a printed version of the page with the lack of features. Ask him to read it, and tell me if any of these lacking features as compared to the Blackberry will cause him problems. He takes the Iphone back with him and says, I'll go return it. He knew exactly what I would say and kinda gave me the sarcastic grin, that's says, You were right, I was wrong and thanks for not beating me up. Thanks for the link Kevin and the writeup Paul. Perfect timing. From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Paul did a brilliant write up on the iphone and how well it plays with activesnyc. http://www.robichaux.net/blog/2008/07/the-iphone-as-a-mail-device.php ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 7:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I have 1 users asking what happens if he replaces his BB with an iPhone? I'm on the BES server and I assume I delete him on the BES server but what do I need to do on the E2K3? Simply turn on Active Sync? __ Stefan Jafs This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
The 90's seem like the wild west of computers to me. No firewalls, open networks, 1112-11 for the install key, everyone on by default, seeing 3d pipes screen savers on screen savers. We are so much more conservative and under control now. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Some of us remember the 90's :) and to be honest, being bleeding edge on Microsoft products tends to cause me sleepless nights -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2008 18:51 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM The whole I'm waiting for SP1 thing is SO 1990's. -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM The beta and RC versions of Hyper-V have proven to be super stable and have great performance. Normally I'd be on board with you for an SP1, but in this case I'm willing to take the plunge. -Original Message- From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM It may be free but would you want to run a production environment on it ? As with any Microsoft product I'll be waiting of SP1.. Vmware's ESX server isn't cheap, but the features it provides are already there and work, once you tie in the full suite from Vmware including virtual centre and DR site recovery manager, in my mind you have a great solution that simplifies both day to day management and DR. Until Microsoft full embraces the virtual world, there will always be a question about support, but hopefully over time that will change. And for the worst case I do a V2P migration and replicate the problem on real piece of tin. -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2008 15:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Some features are worth the money to some people, and there is nothing wrong with that. What does live migration buy you? There's no denying that Hyper-V is a bargain. Live migration buys satisfaction that hardware maintenance will never be an issue. Apparently slated for v2.0 in a year or two... I wonder if it'll still be free? ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ _ This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
Some features are worth the money to some people, and there is nothing wrong with that. What does live migration buy you? It is all about options. I just spent an extra 100$ on a seat for my bike to have it heated. That was an option that I wanted! But that might seem useless to others. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM The Kool-Aid is good, get on board, it costs less, well in this case it does. The Kool-aid lacks live VM migration in v1.0 which makes it a non-starter for many at this point. I will say one thing, the VM management interface team has gone above and beyond. They're right up there in the rarified company of the various SQL teams in my book :) ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
I am putting up a five node cluster and migrating 30 production servers to Hyper-v this weekend for a banking /insurance company that I work for. I am all for doing Hyper-v in production. Hyper-v is not a built from the ground up product it is built on a 5+ year old bit of technology that Microsoft bought and has continued to improve on and build on in-house. I agree with you, Hyper-v does have a limited extended feature set when you compare it to VMware; DR [3], VM to hardware and back migration tools, better management stuff, and so on. However, It is my feeling [1] that the gap in extended features will quickly narrow. Like RDP and Citrix(ICA), the products will have a similar core feature set and VMware will hang on with the very cool Extra features that some people cannot live without. I remember something from working at Microsoft that they aim for 80-85% of the features that everyone needs or something when they come out with a product like Hyper-V, and leave the rest to other vendors. [1] I might be able to back this up but I will never say [2] [2] bloody NDA's [3] For offsite redundancy I have a FIOS Line (200$ for 15MB) to another site that snaps and trickle backups all of my images with DPM [4]. [4] Microsoft seems to toss DPM when you buy lots of stuff or an SA agreement ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM It may be free but would you want to run a production environment on it ? As with any Microsoft product I'll be waiting of SP1.. Vmware's ESX server isn't cheap, but the features it provides are already there and work, once you tie in the full suite from Vmware including virtual centre and DR site recovery manager, in my mind you have a great solution that simplifies both day to day management and DR. Until Microsoft full embraces the virtual world, there will always be a question about support, but hopefully over time that will change. And for the worst case I do a V2P migration and replicate the problem on real piece of tin. -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2008 15:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Some features are worth the money to some people, and there is nothing wrong with that. What does live migration buy you? There's no denying that Hyper-V is a bargain. Live migration buys satisfaction that hardware maintenance will never be an issue. Apparently slated for v2.0 in a year or two... I wonder if it'll still be free? ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ _ This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
DPM, and Clustering do not count as DR or HA tools? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM I think we can trust Hyper-V: http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2008/06/25/microsoft-com-powered-by-hyper-v.aspx Not to say that I use it (I've been using VMware for this type of work for the 7 years), but Hyper-V definitely can be trusted for stability and reliability. However, Microsoft doesn't have DR and HA tools that Vmware has, so they're going to behind the 8ball until then. Thomas W Shinder, M.D. Site: www.isaserver.org Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/ Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 MVP -- Microsoft Firewalls (ISA) -Original Message- From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM It may be free but would you want to run a production environment on it ? As with any Microsoft product I'll be waiting of SP1.. Vmware's ESX server isn't cheap, but the features it provides are already there and work, once you tie in the full suite from Vmware including virtual centre and DR site recovery manager, in my mind you have a great solution that simplifies both day to day management and DR. Until Microsoft full embraces the virtual world, there will always be a question about support, but hopefully over time that will change. And for the worst case I do a V2P migration and replicate the problem on real piece of tin. -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2008 15:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Some features are worth the money to some people, and there is nothing wrong with that. What does live migration buy you? There's no denying that Hyper-V is a bargain. Live migration buys satisfaction that hardware maintenance will never be an issue. Apparently slated for v2.0 in a year or two... I wonder if it'll still be free? ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ _ This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/virtualmachinemanager/en/us/overview.aspx This little bit of badly named acronym rich software seems to perform a great deal of the management, reporting, provisioning, and hardware to VM conversion stuff that we all want and need. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM I think we can trust Hyper-V: http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2008/06/25/microsoft-com-powered-by-hyper-v.aspx Not to say that I use it (I've been using VMware for this type of work for the 7 years), but Hyper-V definitely can be trusted for stability and reliability. However, Microsoft doesn't have DR and HA tools that Vmware has, so they're going to behind the 8ball until then. Thomas W Shinder, M.D. Site: www.isaserver.org Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/ Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 MVP -- Microsoft Firewalls (ISA) -Original Message- From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM It may be free but would you want to run a production environment on it ? As with any Microsoft product I'll be waiting of SP1.. Vmware's ESX server isn't cheap, but the features it provides are already there and work, once you tie in the full suite from Vmware including virtual centre and DR site recovery manager, in my mind you have a great solution that simplifies both day to day management and DR. Until Microsoft full embraces the virtual world, there will always be a question about support, but hopefully over time that will change. And for the worst case I do a V2P migration and replicate the problem on real piece of tin. -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2008 15:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Some features are worth the money to some people, and there is nothing wrong with that. What does live migration buy you? There's no denying that Hyper-V is a bargain. Live migration buys satisfaction that hardware maintenance will never be an issue. Apparently slated for v2.0 in a year or two... I wonder if it'll still be free? ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ _ This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
Honestly, are any HA or DR solutions simple to configure and operate? ' Clusters = complicated., I will never deny that. DPM = free baked pie. I DPM think is one of the simplest to use backup software's out here right now. http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/dataprotectionmanager/en/us/default.aspx Don't smaller shops have to think about cost and ROI too = ] senseless babble Sorry, I might have had like two pitchers to Kool-aid this morning. But you have to put up with it because today is my birthday and I get Pie for lunch, and after dinner!! And my wish is that today will be live in the movie judging your life where I can eat as much as I want with no ill effects and everything that I eat is the best that I have ever had... ahhh what a dream. /senseless babble ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM DPM, and Clustering do not count as DR or HA tools? I don't think whether they count or not is the point; they're certainly proven techniques. The pesky configuration and management overhead/complexity might be the real issue here, particularly for the smaller shops who have the same business critical HA needs as large enterprises. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
I prefer the No sugar added blue monster... or a nice shot of zippfizz mmm 46,000% you daily intake of b12. Whatever I am drinking today I am sure that it has a Microsoft Logo on it. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Kevin, Kool aid? More like 2 pitchers of red-bull. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Honestly, are any HA or DR solutions simple to configure and operate? ' Clusters = complicated., I will never deny that. DPM = free baked pie. I DPM think is one of the simplest to use backup software's out here right now. http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/dataprotectionmanager/en/us/default.aspx Don't smaller shops have to think about cost and ROI too = ] senseless babble Sorry, I might have had like two pitchers to Kool-aid this morning. But you have to put up with it because today is my birthday and I get Pie for lunch, and after dinner!! And my wish is that today will be live in the movie judging your life where I can eat as much as I want with no ill effects and everything that I eat is the best that I have ever had... ahhh what a dream. /senseless babble ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM DPM, and Clustering do not count as DR or HA tools? I don't think whether they count or not is the point; they're certainly proven techniques. The pesky configuration and management overhead/complexity might be the real issue here, particularly for the smaller shops who have the same business critical HA needs as large enterprises. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
According to the bra sizing guidelines in this link http://www.barenecessities.com/fit_sizing.asp I am a 54 negative C According to Wikipedia's sizing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra_size I am a 54D I am not sure that you can get either those over the counter, and I don't see any links on the website about how big the band size is for their bras.. On another even more off the topic note. I have finally achieved level 50 on progress quest. http://www.progressquest.com/ ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Happy Birthday Kevin. I support you, buddy... just tell me what size to get for ya: http://www.shockabsorber.co.uk/bounceometer/shock.html (Mostly SFW) From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM I prefer the No sugar added blue monster... or a nice shot of zippfizz mmm 46,000% you daily intake of b12. Whatever I am drinking today I am sure that it has a Microsoft Logo on it. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Kevin, Kool aid? More like 2 pitchers of red-bull. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Honestly, are any HA or DR solutions simple to configure and operate? ' Clusters = complicated., I will never deny that. DPM = free baked pie. I DPM think is one of the simplest to use backup software's out here right now. http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/dataprotectionmanager/en/us/default.aspx Don't smaller shops have to think about cost and ROI too = ] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
Michael I will back you up on this one. I have recently, personally over food, had this conversation with some Engineers on the Exchange support team as well. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM This discussion occurred recently on a private message board for MVPs and Exchange product group personnel. We were told by an Exchange escalation engineer that best effort is the policy and will continue to be the policy. In an earlier discussion last month, the Exchange escalation manager asked the MVPs if we could identify a specific incident where support had been refused (given the published caveats), and if it happened, he wanted to know about it. Now, in regards to your TAM and your account rep: their response doesn't fit the official party line. I don't think I can say more without breaking NDA. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Update: Exchange on VM My account rep and TAM both stated that they will not even provide best effort. She sent me a link that trumped the best effort article. She basically said that http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232170.aspx (which simply says unsupported) trumped http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=897615 (which states best effort) From her email In regards to your question below, the Exchange 2007 specific article would take precedence over the general support policy On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The position hasn't changed. Folks with premier support will receive best effort until and if a problem is determined to be related to the virtualization platform. Microsoft does not and never has supported other vendor's software. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://theessentialexchange.com/ -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM http://blogs.technet.com/scottschnoll/archive/2008/06/15/exchange- server-2007-and-hyper-v.aspx ...and not a word was whispered about ESX. The silence is deafening. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Update: Exchange on VM
It read fine to me!! The Kool-Aid is good, get on board, it costs less, well in this case it does. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM Sorry for the terrible grammar. Tired From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 7:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM It's going to be interesting to see how this plays out over time. Microsoft is going to take a lot of heat of the say We support our virtual servers, but not yours. That's the kind of stuff that causes bad press and possibly other issues. Hyper-V looks cool, but VMware is cool and I'm not ready to drink that Kool-Aid just yet. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM This discussion occurred recently on a private message board for MVPs and Exchange product group personnel. We were told by an Exchange escalation engineer that best effort is the policy and will continue to be the policy. In an earlier discussion last month, the Exchange escalation manager asked the MVPs if we could identify a specific incident where support had been refused (given the published caveats), and if it happened, he wanted to know about it. Now, in regards to your TAM and your account rep: their response doesn't fit the official party line. I don't think I can say more without breaking NDA. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Update: Exchange on VM My account rep and TAM both stated that they will not even provide best effort. She sent me a link that trumped the best effort article. She basically said that http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232170.aspx (which simply says unsupported) trumped http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=897615 (which states best effort) From her email In regards to your question below, the Exchange 2007 specific article would take precedence over the general support policy On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The position hasn't changed. Folks with premier support will receive best effort until and if a problem is determined to be related to the virtualization platform. Microsoft does not and never has supported other vendor's software. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp://theessentialexchange.com/ -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update: Exchange on VM http://blogs.technet.com/scottschnoll/archive/2008/06/15/exchange- server-2007-and-hyper-v.aspx ...and not a word was whispered about ESX. The silence is deafening. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Teneros
SCR would be better.. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Teneros Has anyone used this in a DR scenrio? I'd like to get some feedback from someone with firsthand experience. Thank you, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
Any idea why this was not checked? Do you have security inheritance turned on from this object up to the top? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Solution ---RE: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I have solved the issue and thought I would reply back with the solution if anyone was curious. I got this solution directly from Microsoft. In adsiedit under : Configuration - Services - Microsoft Exchange - organization name - Administrative Groups - Exchange Administrative Group - Servers - Servername - Protocols - SMTP Receive Connectors - Client servername Right click and click properties, click the security tab and grant the Authenticated users group the Accept Authoritative Domain Sender allow permission. Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender Hi, I have several users that are getting this error when sending using our exchange 2007 server in outlook, thunderbird Eudora, windows mail etc. Ive done a lot of research on this and got the subject of this message from the receive logs on the server 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I see that a lot of sites have postings that suggest that the users do not have the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender I also see that various postings have various different methods of granting the said permission so my questions are these 1) Does that make sense that adding that permission is what needs to be done? I don't feel so comfortable about running permission altering things when I don't fully understand the repercussions. 2) What is the proper way to grant this permission, I see one posting that has a syntax granting it to a particular user (-user 'domain\username') and another one that uses -user AU (which I have no idea what AU stands for, but implies that it grants it to everyone). Has anyone run into this and have a suggestion? Its worth noting that there are several accounts also that have no problem sending and seem to work fine. Also I am talking specifically about users using IMAP/SMTP and not MAPI. Thanks! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
I was, at one time, part of the team that wrote those errors [1]. The ones that I dealt with for E2K7 made sense to when I reviewed or wrote them, or when I wrote the articles that described how to fix them. The error has to be as small and informative as possible, and work from more than one point of view, and be localizable. They are getting better, but there is always room for improvement. To be better heard remember that for any topic or error that you can rate or comment on in the help on MSDN or on Technet comment it with your feedback. That feedback is automatically entered in to the bug tracking software at Microsoft and assigned to the person responsible for the document or area of the code base. If possible the documents are changed, if not the feedback is applied to future work. If you are really bold leave your email address in the comment and ask for a response. I made a point of always responding to those that gave me feedback, most others on the Exchange team are the same way. [1] I had a brilliant editor on my team who made sure that it sounded good when I was done with it. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Inside track? HAH. :) I just complain vociferously and often enough that I get responses - sometimes. Error messages are improving, but it's a slow process. They have come a LONG way from Exchange 5.x, when all you got was the MAPI error. All the new .Net-based code in Exchange 2007 has significantly improved error messages - in fact, sometimes you wish the product would just SHUT UP. But having too much is generally preferable to having too little, that's for certain. It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. The more localized text you have in a program, the bigger the program is, the more memory it takes, the longer reporting an error takes, the more code paths that have to be executed to check for errors, etc. etc. etc. It's a line that has to be tread carefully. As systems grow more capable, there are more/better errors. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Error: -2147467259 They're logged at 4 minutes past minute, then 40 minutes past. They're logged again a 4 minutes past mid-day then 40 minutes past. Then again at midnight. I checked to see
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
This looks like a cool tool for error codes. Microsoft Exchange Server Error Code Look-up http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=be596899-7bb8-4208-b7fc-09e02a13696cdisplaylang=entm Overview Use the Error Code Lookup tool to determine error values from decimal and hexadecimal error codes in Microsoft Windows(r) operating systems. The tool can look up one or more values at a time. All values on the command line will be looked up in Exchange's internal tables and presented to you. If available, informational data associated with the value or values will also be shown. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Inside track? HAH. :) I just complain vociferously and often enough that I get responses - sometimes. Error messages are improving, but it's a slow process. They have come a LONG way from Exchange 5.x, when all you got was the MAPI error. All the new .Net-based code in Exchange 2007 has significantly improved error messages - in fact, sometimes you wish the product would just SHUT UP. But having too much is generally preferable to having too little, that's for certain. It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. The more localized text you have in a program, the bigger the program is, the more memory it takes, the longer reporting an error takes, the more code paths that have to be executed to check for errors, etc. etc. etc. It's a line that has to be tread carefully. As systems grow more capable, there are more/better errors. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Logon Failure on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (XYZABC) - Windows 2000 account stoop\Administrator; mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Error: -2147467259 They're logged at 4 minutes past minute, then 40 minutes past. They're logged again a 4 minutes past mid-day then 40 minutes past. Then again at midnight. I checked to see if the computer account XYZABC, had someone got a mail address, but it doesn't, and I don't see it listed in the list of mailboxes on the store under the server object in ESM. Saw a few pointers towards the RUS needing to be rebuilt - done that, and the same error's are still logged. Would I need to to the Enterprise RUS, and the domain RUS for the other domain as well? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~
RE: Strange pair of events twice daily
Seriously?? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Heck no, it ain't. it has the new date, but is the same version from 2004. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey! They finally made the new one public. That's great! Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily This looks like a cool tool for error codes. Microsoft Exchange Server Error Code Look-up http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=be596899-7bb8-4208-b7fc-09e02a13696cdisplaylang=entm Overview Use the Error Code Lookup tool to determine error values from decimal and hexadecimal error codes in Microsoft Windows(r) operating systems. The tool can look up one or more values at a time. All values on the command line will be looked up in Exchange's internal tables and presented to you. If available, informational data associated with the value or values will also be shown. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Inside track? HAH. :) I just complain vociferously and often enough that I get responses - sometimes. Error messages are improving, but it's a slow process. They have come a LONG way from Exchange 5.x, when all you got was the MAPI error. All the new .Net-based code in Exchange 2007 has significantly improved error messages - in fact, sometimes you wish the product would just SHUT UP. But having too much is generally preferable to having too little, that's for certain. It sounds weird, but good error messages cause code bloat. The more localized text you have in a program, the bigger the program is, the more memory it takes, the longer reporting an error takes, the more code paths that have to be executed to check for errors, etc. etc. etc. It's a line that has to be tread carefully. As systems grow more capable, there are more/better errors. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily Hey Michael, seeing as you appear to have some inside track to Microsoft, can you enlighten us on why they can't put their errors in plain english? I mean, what's the point in being so darn cryptic? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Strange pair of events twice daily I love generic errors. Not. That error is MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED. However, because of the logon failure - I would tend to wonder - how many disabled users do you have and do any of them have mailboxes associated with them? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily D'oh, I meant all of the Exchange servers in one of the DOMAINS (not admin groups, as it's a single admin group). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 11:50:05 AM Subject: Strange pair of events twice daily Hi all, We have a dozen Exchange 2003 SP 2 servers, split across two domains, all in the same Administrative Group. On all of the Exchange servers in one of the Admin groups, we get the following pair of events logged : Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category:General Event ID: 9562 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description: Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=First Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=XYZABC. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category:Logons Event ID: 1022 Date:6/3/2008 Time:12:04:08 AM User:N/A Computer: XYZABC Description
RE: Anyone using SCR?
Yes.. we like it lots.. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Anyone using SCR? Hello- Has anyone implemented SCR? What are your impressions? Like/dislike? Easy to recover from a failure? I will probably be implementing this and am interested in hearing what current users think. Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Puget Sound Admins?
Mr. tissueguy, Sir. This would be a brilliant place to start.. http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/05/19/448908.aspx ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: Puget Sound Admins? I know a bunch of you guys had an informal Puget Sound Admins group going for a while... is that still active? I've just moved to the area and am looking to make a few contacts (and for a job in August/September, but that's beside the point... for now. :) ) Offlist response here or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is fine. This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OT Puget Sound Admins?
Poker at my house weekend after this one To welcome another Kevin to the Area? Saturday night, that we be the 7th.. Anyone else in the neighborhood up for it? I live in Woodinville near cottage lake. I've got heeps of square feets to host plenty of people. I will miss Wednesday too, It is my day with my kid, and my mother's Birthday. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Puget Sound Admins? Thanks - I noted that group while looking for signs of the one from this list... unfortunately I'll be back in Wisconsin next week and missing the first meeting. Besides, I was really looking for the informal group, as the only folks I know out here right now are my wife, daughter and dog. I suppose you could count our real estate agent, too... Don't pigeonhole me with the tissues. Andy might like the diapers, after all... From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Puget Sound Admins? Mr. tissueguy, Sir. This would be a brilliant place to start.. http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/05/19/448908.aspx ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: Puget Sound Admins? I know a bunch of you guys had an informal Puget Sound Admins group going for a while... is that still active? I've just moved to the area and am looking to make a few contacts (and for a job in August/September, but that's beside the point... for now. :) ) Offlist response here or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is fine. This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Off Topic Question
Build a image and sysprep it, build MSI's of all of the applications. On another note please delete this message and respond immediately by e-mail to the author or call 617-241-3000. How can I reply to the message after I have deleted it? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Theochares, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Off Topic Question What's the best app to use for capturing and recording keystrokes in a script to be used on a rollout that has numerous fill in the blanks plus an added windows component? George Theochares Campbell Campbell Edwards Conroy Professional Corporation [cid:image001.jpg@01C8B75B.8F4BB6F0] One Constitution Plaza Boston, MA 02129 Tel: (617) 241-3044 Fax: (617) 241-5115 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Note : This e-mail contains information from the law firm of Campbell Campbell Edwards Conroy Professional Corporation that may be proprietary, confidential, or protected under the attorney- client privilege or work-product doctrine. This e-mail is intended for the use only of the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient named above, you are strictly prohibited from reading, disclosing, copying, or distributing this e-mail or its contents, and from taking any action in reliance on the contents of this e-mail. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete this message and respond immediately by e-mail to the author or call 617-241-3000. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~inline: image001.jpg
RE: OWA Customization
I did answer your question... ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA Customization Always the smart ass :) _ John Bowles - Original Message From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:17:15 PM Subject: RE: OWA Customization Yes there are some.. Keep looking = ] ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Customization All- Is there aren article floating around somewhere that discusses customizing the OWA Logon and Logoff pages for 2003? I've seen a few blurbs here and there but haven't found a good one to base my work on. Thank you, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www..sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OWA Customization
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/08/30/428793.aspx Here.. Let me be your Google big boy... ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA Customization Always the smart ass :) _ John Bowles - Original Message From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:17:15 PM Subject: RE: OWA Customization Yes there are some.. Keep looking = ] ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Customization All- Is there aren article floating around somewhere that discusses customizing the OWA Logon and Logoff pages for 2003? I've seen a few blurbs here and there but haven't found a good one to base my work on. Thank you, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www..sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
OT: Exchange Failover Product..
I am all about your Direction. Exchange 2007 sounds like a much better solution, no offence to Stu... insert self promotion bit that made me laugh We had a customer ask us for references for an Exchange engagement today. As part of the reference package we sent them an Amazon book list. Out of 5 people on my team, four of us have published more than two books (Mostly about Microsoft Stuff) with our names as the author on them, and the fifth is working to get his first book out with his name on it. Also four of the 5 of us are MVPS. The customer seems to be ok with our references. /insert self promotion made me laugh ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Failover Product.. Going in a completely different direction here. How about Exchange 2007 with CCR? For the price of the upgrade you get your redundancy and the upgrade. From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Failover Product.. Hi Everyone, I'm looking for a Exchange 2003 failover software product. Years ago I used Double Take at another job and wanted ot see if that was the way to go. Basically I want to put another exchange server at another site and have that box take over if the main exchange server ever goes down or has issues etc. we currently have only one exchange box. Any help is appreciated... Thanks.. Btw we have a 50mbit mpls connection between sites.. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OWA Customization
I have a number of plans. My boy and I have spent the last few months working out details. It's been a great exercise in planning for him and I. He keeps wanting to head north because he thinks the Zombies will freeze and become corpsicles, if that does not work he wants to play A-team in the garage and build some massive battle rig with Zombie Mower blades all around it. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Customization Hey KM, what's your Zombie plan? Shook -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Customization I did answer your question... ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange Failover Product..
I've been anti-cluster for a very long time. the only good cluster is a single node -Ed | I have always agreed with him Lately I have been building Clusters and putting VM's on them; I am starting to feel that that is the best way to do it. Your Cluster becomes a hardware pool with redundancy that you can place virtual machines on. You can optimize the hardware pool resource allocation to the virtuals on the fly; adding and removing ram and what not as needed. It makes it very simple to add more hardware to your servers, you just add another cluster node and move the VM to the new hardware, takes minutes in the users eyes. No need to migrate or fiddle with server names and IP address and crap like we have to do on dedicated hardware. ~2000$ for an 8 proc server with 16GB or ram, and ~2000$ for Windows server 2008 enterprise ( comes with 4 VM server cals, for 6k you can run datacenter and have unlimited VM's) to add a node that can support 1-10+ VM's depending on what you need. Well you have to storage in there. I just build a 4TB NAS running open filer ( 8 x 1tb drives in raid 0+1 for I/O) for like 3500$ or something. I am starting to like clusters, just not clusters but I still don't like clustered Exchange ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Failover Product.. Yeah, well, I'm anti-cluster where Exchange is concerned. But all about recommending SCR. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: Exchange Failover Product.. I am all about your Direction. Exchange 2007 sounds like a much better solution, no offence to Stu... insert self promotion bit that made me laugh We had a customer ask us for references for an Exchange engagement today. As part of the reference package we sent them an Amazon book list. Out of 5 people on my team, four of us have published more than two books (Mostly about Microsoft Stuff) with our names as the author on them, and the fifth is working to get his first book out with his name on it. Also four of the 5 of us are MVPS. The customer seems to be ok with our references. /insert self promotion made me laugh ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Failover Product.. Going in a completely different direction here. How about Exchange 2007 with CCR? For the price of the upgrade you get your redundancy and the upgrade. From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Failover Product.. Hi Everyone, I'm looking for a Exchange 2003 failover software product. Years ago I used Double Take at another job and wanted ot see if that was the way to go. Basically I want to put another exchange server at another site and have that box take over if the main exchange server ever goes down or has issues etc. we currently have only one exchange box. Any help is appreciated... Thanks.. Btw we have a 50mbit mpls connection between sites.. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange Failover Product..
I 100% agree with that.. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Failover Product.. Clusters allow a well-managed server farm to go from 99.9% availability to 99.99% availability. Emphasis on well-managed. Those are, quite frankly, few and far between. In most shops that I've seen, clusters actually reduce availability. These days, you can install Exchange, configure it a little bit, set up your backups, and it'll just hum along for you for months and months without requiring you to touch it. Run a patch install at 3am on Sunday morning once a month, and you're done. If you buy good hardware for the server - you'll probably not have to touch it except when a disk needs replacing. And of course, you have SMART/SCSI monitoring, so you know when that happens, you pick up a phone and order a disk, it's hot-swappable and auto-rebuild. Or you have it in inventory because e-mail is a critical service. You're done. No frickin' way you get off that easy with a cluster. It requires a LOT more care and feeding. In certain (very rare) circumstances, I can believe that that expert care and feeding is worth 0.09% increased availability. But honestly, I don't think I've EVER seen one. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Failover Product.. I can understand Anti-SCC, but why would you be Anti-CCR? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Failover Product.. Yeah, well, I'm anti-cluster where Exchange is concerned. But all about recommending SCR. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: Exchange Failover Product.. I am all about your Direction. Exchange 2007 sounds like a much better solution, no offence to Stu... insert self promotion bit that made me laugh We had a customer ask us for references for an Exchange engagement today. As part of the reference package we sent them an Amazon book list. Out of 5 people on my team, four of us have published more than two books (Mostly about Microsoft Stuff) with our names as the author on them, and the fifth is working to get his first book out with his name on it. Also four of the 5 of us are MVPS. The customer seems to be ok with our references. /insert self promotion made me laugh ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Failover Product.. Going in a completely different direction here. How about Exchange 2007 with CCR? For the price of the upgrade you get your redundancy and the upgrade. From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Failover Product.. Hi Everyone, I'm looking for a Exchange 2003 failover software product. Years ago I used Double Take at another job and wanted ot see if that was the way to go. Basically I want to put another exchange server at another site and have that box take over if the main exchange server ever goes down or has issues etc. we currently have only one exchange box. Any help is appreciated... Thanks.. Btw we have a 50mbit mpls connection between sites.. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use
Researching up a sweet blog post? ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 6:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Yes, it was in the early guidance. The VERY earliest guidance was .int - and then that was an oops moment, because that's actually a legal TLD. Then about Win2K release, the guidance was .local, but basically anything that wasn't a TLD; then IANA went and authorized 16 (or so, I don't remember) new TLDs... Then the guidance became - register the domain. Been that way since before 2003 was released. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Wasn't it in early MS guidance for 2000 or perhaps it was 2003, that you use .local? The concept of split DNS was relatively new, if I remember correctly. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Interestingly, I just installed SBS 2003 R2 for a new customer yesterday, and the SBS installation wizard actually suggested .local! I was surprised. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Why .local? On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Oliver Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We looked at a wildcard cert but that wont work as our internal domain is a .local and externally we are a .com. The users connection settings are pre-filled by Outlook 2007. Is this editable in AD so that we are able to change the server FQDN they connect to? From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 May 2008 16:19 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Another way might be a 'wildcard certificate'. One that handles *.domain.comhttp://domain.com/, www.domain.comhttp://www.domain.com/, domain.comhttp://domain.com/, mail.domain.comhttp://mail.domain.com/, etc. A little more spendy though... From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use Split DNS On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Oliver Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi chaps, I have an Exchange 2007 server here on which we have setup an SSL certificate (in the name of mail.mydomain.comhttp://mail.mydomain.com/). This works great for users outside using Outlook 2007s Outlook Anywhere feature. However, internal users get a warning stating that the SSL cert name doesn't match the server. It's not the biggest issue, but it's...untidy. What's the best way to handle this? Obviously I can only attach one SSL cert to the Default site in IIS on the Exchange box and the internal domain (mydomain.local) is sufficiently different from the external one (mydomain.comhttp://mydomain.com/) that we can't get an SSL cert to cover both. Is there a way to create a new IIS site that still points at the same exchange folder structure as the current Default Site but that is set to accept a different hostname? That way I could have one site for the internal users hitting blue-server.mydomain.local and one for the external users hitting mail.mydomain.comhttp://mail.mydomain.com/ and attach a correct cert to both. Can this be done ? Olly ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exch2007 in ESX
I like to see supported as a grey area. They will answer your call, and they will help you. [1] It is up to them at which time they say we cannot support your setup, you need to install this on supported hardware before we can go further I have yet to hear Microsoft say that on a call that I have made to PSS. It is a gamble. In some environments you cannot do that, in others you can. It is up to company to decide to roll those dice based on their needs and perceived benefits from the unsupported configuration. unsupported means not tested, or that will not work. It is up the support staff to figure that out where that line should be drawn. [1] they being Microsoft. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX When Hyper-V is released that configuration will be supported. I'm fairly certain that running any version of Exchange on any beta OS is not a supported config. ;-) TVK -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX Really? Its supported on Hyper-V, a piece of software that hasn’t been fully released yet? (currently running the RC and liking it, but nothing in production yet) -troy -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 9:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX I virtualized everything.. Exchange 2007 works great visualized. It is even fully supported if you use Hyper-V ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exch2007 in ESX Anyone virtualized Exchange 2007? I'm getting mixed opinions. My Dell server guys are saying performance would suffer too much. I also have a local integrator who is a VMware and MS Gold Partner and says they virtualize everything and that because my information store is only about 25GB for approx 150 boxes I wouldn't have performance problems. Thoughts? Thanks, Dennis ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exch2007 in ESX
What was your support call about? OCS can be such a pain to make work. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exch2007 in ESX We, today, had PSS tell us that on an OCS install - and we admitted the install was a proof of concept, not production. I do not believe for an instant that the problem we were having related to using VMWare. On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like to see supported as a grey area. They will answer your call, and they will help you. [1] It is up to them at which time they say we cannot support your setup, you need to install this on supported hardware before we can go further I have yet to hear Microsoft say that on a call that I have made to PSS. It is a gamble. In some environments you cannot do that, in others you can. It is up to company to decide to roll those dice based on their needs and perceived benefits from the unsupported configuration. unsupported means not tested, or that will not work. It is up the support staff to figure that out where that line should be drawn. [1] they being Microsoft. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX When Hyper-V is released that configuration will be supported. I'm fairly certain that running any version of Exchange on any beta OS is not a supported config. ;-) TVK -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX Really? Its supported on Hyper-V, a piece of software that hasn't been fully released yet? (currently running the RC and liking it, but nothing in production yet) -troy -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 9:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX I virtualized everything.. Exchange 2007 works great visualized. It is even fully supported if you use Hyper-V ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exch2007 in ESX Anyone virtualized Exchange 2007? I'm getting mixed opinions. My Dell server guys are saying performance would suffer too much. I also have a local integrator who is a VMware and MS Gold Partner and says they virtualize everything and that because my information store is only about 25GB for approx 150 boxes I wouldn't have performance problems. Thoughts? Thanks, Dennis ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exch2007 in ESX
I virtualized everything.. Exchange 2007 works great visualized. It is even fully supported if you use Hyper-V ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exch2007 in ESX Anyone virtualized Exchange 2007? I'm getting mixed opinions. My Dell server guys are saying performance would suffer too much. I also have a local integrator who is a VMware and MS Gold Partner and says they virtualize everything and that because my information store is only about 25GB for approx 150 boxes I wouldn't have performance problems. Thoughts? Thanks, Dennis ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Quest Software for Exchange
Raises hand I know the tool!!! ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan? -Original Message- From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quest Software for Exchange All- I'm looking for anyone who has had experience with the Quest Exchange migration tools and to gather their experiences with the tool. I'm in the planning stages of migrating from one forest to another and I need a tool that will keep the co-existence in place until the migration is complete. I'm wondering if this tool will provide this functionality and the experiences associated with it. Thank you, _ John Bowles Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Email Certificates
What version of Exchange are you running? From: Jeff Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Email Certificates I need help correcting filling in/correcting holes in my understanding of email certificates and how they work. I purchase a well known cert for my domain so that I can send encrypted email over the public domain. Because I laid out the money for this well known cert, I don't have to exchange certificates with folks outside my domain in order for them to read my encrypted email, right? In Outlook, there is a checkbox to encrypt outgoing email. Is there a way on the org. level to say all mail sent to anyone @thisorg.comhttp://thisorg.com outside my domain should always be encrypted? Because I paid the big bucks, can we just set it on the domain level to encrypt ALL outgoing email? Will this well known cert allow my BB users to send encrypted email to folks not in my org? TIA, I really appreciate those of you who are able/willing to educate the poorly informed. Jeff ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
OT -- Xonbi - like it?-
Has anyone played with Xonbi yet? http://www.xobni.com/friend/MTA4MTcx I think that I am in software love with this product. Pretty graphs showing when I get emails from people, phone numbers striped and saved for me ( I am lazy), all of the attachments from people in a super fast to get to spot (this saves me huge amounts of times) and the social thing is kind of cool. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?-
I would love have one that I could share I am harassing them to see if they will give me some.. the video is like the first hit of crack, it is free, and it really makes you want some more. From: Beckett, William (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Don't happen to have an invite code, do ya? From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Has anyone played with Xonbi yet? http://www.xobni.com/friend/MTA4MTcx I think that I am in software love with this product. Pretty graphs showing when I get emails from people, phone numbers striped and saved for me ( I am lazy), all of the attachments from people in a super fast to get to spot (this saves me huge amounts of times) and the social thing is kind of cool. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?-
I am amazed at how fast it started working. Seconds after installing at work it had all of the stats and such up and going for my personal inbox. (granted I have an insane machine [1], but 4000 messages can take some work to process) [1] 8 cores and 16GB or ram for my desktop. I love cheap hardware. From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Second that, looks interesting and would love an invite ;) From: Beckett, William (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Don't happen to have an invite code, do ya? From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Has anyone played with Xonbi yet? http://www.xobni.com/friend/MTA4MTcx I think that I am in software love with this product. Pretty graphs showing when I get emails from people, phone numbers striped and saved for me ( I am lazy), all of the attachments from people in a super fast to get to spot (this saves me huge amounts of times) and the social thing is kind of cool. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?-
I got oked for 20 activations, first come first serve.. Since you are so pumped Please tell your friends to use the code KevinMiller20 at www.xobni.com/downloadhttp://www.xobni.com/download to get instant access to the limited beta. I've made 20 codes for you to share From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- I am amazed at how fast it started working. Seconds after installing at work it had all of the stats and such up and going for my personal inbox. (granted I have an insane machine [1], but 4000 messages can take some work to process) [1] 8 cores and 16GB or ram for my desktop. I love cheap hardware. From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Second that, looks interesting and would love an invite ;) From: Beckett, William (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Don't happen to have an invite code, do ya? From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Has anyone played with Xonbi yet? http://www.xobni.com/friend/MTA4MTcx I think that I am in software love with this product. Pretty graphs showing when I get emails from people, phone numbers striped and saved for me ( I am lazy), all of the attachments from people in a super fast to get to spot (this saves me huge amounts of times) and the social thing is kind of cool. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?-
ASUS MB, Dual AMD 4 core 2.8GHZ process, 16GB of ram RAM. HD is 2x136 10,000RPM drives, the rest is ISCSI to a san. I think it was 600 for the box from www.ewiz.comhttp://www.ewiz.com From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Got one, thanks Kevin. What've you got there for a box? That has more RAM than my biggest server. On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got oked for 20 activations, first come first serve.. Since you are so pumped Please tell your friends to use the code KevinMiller20 at www.xobni.com/downloadhttp://www.xobni.com/download to get instant access to the limited beta. I've made 20 codes for you to share From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- I am amazed at how fast it started working. Seconds after installing at work it had all of the stats and such up and going for my personal inbox. (granted I have an insane machine [1], but 4000 messages can take some work to process) [1] 8 cores and 16GB or ram for my desktop. I love cheap hardware. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?-
You did not tell me how cool it was, or maybe I was ignoring you that day.. Today I love it!!! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 3:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- Dude, I sent that to you months ago. Search is great, but it only does the mail folders. The images are not pulled from contacts yet. It indexes 10GB of PSTs for me. Analytics take awhile. It doesn't listen to add-in management settings through the registry. http://www.slipstick.com/reviews/xobni.htm From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT -- Xonbi - like it?- I am amazed at how fast it started working. Seconds after installing at work it had all of the stats and such up and going for my personal inbox. (granted I have an insane machine [1], but 4000 messages can take some work to process) [1] 8 cores and 16GB or ram for my desktop. I love cheap hardware. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Attachment size limits
No limit at all means 10mb.. create a limit for both and you should be good. From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment size limits Thanks Sherry and John, I looked in both places. Under the SMTP Virtual server setting, the limits are not checked at all, so I assume there are no limits or the limits are set by the registry. Under the Global Settings, the only setting set is the # of recipients. Others are set to No Limits. Other suggestions? From: Senter, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment size limits Also check: Global Settings, Message Delivery, Defaults tab. This covers all servers and SMTP connectors. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Attachment size limits You have to go to the Exchange SMTP virtual server, right click, select properties, select message tab and that's where it's at. On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Tom Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CEO requested adjustment on Exchange 2003 to allow attachments larger than 10MB. I've looked in Systems Manager, there are no limits set for mailbox send and receive. Is this setting located in another area and/or a registry key that needs to be added? TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3012 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3012 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3012 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Attachment size limits
If the recipients are external it is highly likely that no one will be able to receive it if the email is too large. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment size limits Thanks Richard, Our CEO's secretary is preparing the email for the CEO to send to specific recipients and we're ran into this situation before so I'll just set it globally for everyone to avoid any further calls to the Pres. Complaining they are limited in doing their jobs. (long story) Thanks for all the help ya'll!! -Original Message- From: Staley, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment size limits Tom, Although I agree with everyone else that the defaults are included in the System Manger, if you have active directory running, you can modify an individual's sizes. Go to active directory and select the user, right click and select properties. On the Exchange General tab click on the Delivery Restrictions button and set the send limit to whatever the CEO requires. This setting will override the defaults in System manager. Richard Staley Network Administrator Martin Electronics, Inc. - This electronic message is intended for the exclusive use by the person(s) to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify me of your inadvertent receipt and delete this message from all data storage systems. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:35 MEI AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachment size limits CEO requested adjustment on Exchange 2003 to allow attachments larger than 10MB. I've looked in Systems Manager, there are no limits set for mailbox send and receive. Is this setting located in another area and/or a registry key that needs to be added? TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3012 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3013 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3013 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Attachment size limits
Web pages, or make things smaller -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment size limits I've communicated that to his secretary. I've looked at some solutions to this problem, but it would be nice to hear what solutions the list members use to avoid sending documents through email. Any suggestions? Thanks! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment size limits If the recipients are external it is highly likely that no one will be able to receive it if the email is too large. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment size limits Thanks Richard, Our CEO's secretary is preparing the email for the CEO to send to specific recipients and we're ran into this situation before so I'll just set it globally for everyone to avoid any further calls to the Pres. Complaining they are limited in doing their jobs. (long story) Thanks for all the help ya'll!! -Original Message- From: Staley, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachment size limits Tom, Although I agree with everyone else that the defaults are included in the System Manger, if you have active directory running, you can modify an individual's sizes. Go to active directory and select the user, right click and select properties. On the Exchange General tab click on the Delivery Restrictions button and set the send limit to whatever the CEO requires. This setting will override the defaults in System manager. Richard Staley Network Administrator Martin Electronics, Inc. - This electronic message is intended for the exclusive use by the person(s) to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify me of your inadvertent receipt and delete this message from all data storage systems. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:35 MEI AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachment size limits CEO requested adjustment on Exchange 2003 to allow attachments larger than 10MB. I've looked in Systems Manager, there are no limits set for mailbox send and receive. Is this setting located in another area and/or a registry key that needs to be added? TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3012 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3013 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3013 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3013 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3013 (20080409) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
Define feature-less ?? -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I agree, Windows Mobile will get you there, and fast, but it's a little cumbersome and feature-less. Read some of my posts in the archives about Windows Mobile in a thread titled SmartPhones...To sum it up, if you go Windows Mobile, look for devices that are version 6.1 I would recommend BB or a product called Good Messaging (Runs on most all phone platforms). Both are set and forget. Both also have hosted services, if you don't feel like running another server. But, like John said, the hardware requirements are minimal. FYI, the costs for the license and support of Good Messaging for our business is a couple bucks a month per cell phone line. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
How many items do you have in your inbox / how many rules do you have ? what version of outlook / what version of exchange / what other things do you have installed with outlook / are you in cached mode / does it do this with every message. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
If you have some complicated rules it can help to add, stop processing more rules at the end of them. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Mmmm, I think you may have clued me in to something Kevin; I do have a lot of rules set. I'll check that... For the others: Inbox: Less than 100 Rules: About 20 Version: 11, Outlook 2003, SP3, Build 8139 Exchange: 2003, SP2 No cached mode Yes, it looks as if this happens when a new message begins to be received by Outlook, I checked the Connection status (Ctrl-Click on taskbar icon, states about 2 seconds average. No other apps are affected, only Outlook This is a brand new install of Windows XP, patched fully with Office 2003 Pro full install, fully patched also. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds How many items do you have in your inbox / how many rules do you have ? what version of outlook / what version of exchange / what other things do you have installed with outlook / are you in cached mode / does it do this with every message. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
Also, 20 rules is not that many. I have 131 rules currently. Outlook 2007. However most of my rules are very simple TO or FROM then MOVE to folder rules. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Mmmm, I think you may have clued me in to something Kevin; I do have a lot of rules set. I'll check that... For the others: Inbox: Less than 100 Rules: About 20 Version: 11, Outlook 2003, SP3, Build 8139 Exchange: 2003, SP2 No cached mode Yes, it looks as if this happens when a new message begins to be received by Outlook, I checked the Connection status (Ctrl-Click on taskbar icon, states about 2 seconds average. No other apps are affected, only Outlook This is a brand new install of Windows XP, patched fully with Office 2003 Pro full install, fully patched also. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds How many items do you have in your inbox / how many rules do you have ? what version of outlook / what version of exchange / what other things do you have installed with outlook / are you in cached mode / does it do this with every message. -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds
Add-ins are another good one to check. I ran some thread compressor thing for a while that was supposed to make treads more Gmail like. It seemed to crash everything. mutter, internal tools, mutter -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Large message? Large inbox? Cached mode? We run cached mode normally and I've had Outlook appear to freeze when some id-ten-t sends a 5-8 meg attachment to all 1000 users at our campus (remote from the centralized Exchange servers). Does your AV have an Outlook add-in? If so, did that get disabled as well during your test? -Original Message- From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 Freezing for 4-5 seconds Has anyone had the experience of Outlook freezing for about 3-05 seconds just before a piece of email is delivered? I've disabled ESET 3.0 thinking that was causing the delay...it wasn't. I'm out of Google fu. Any help appreciated! TIA, Tom __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2995 (20080402) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones
I was thinking as I was reading this, it does these things Then I read your last line. Most of these things require Exchange 2007, Windows Mobile 6 or better. Some of these need SCMDM -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones 'My' list of features missing from WinMob 5: Lack of admin console/remote management/reporting Meeting Attendee Information Out of Office Management Dedicated Technical Support (For MS it's pay per incident, or forums, peers, etc). SSL Certificate Management Message Flags (Still can't get over that they missed this). Notes Search (It's very limited) Public Folders Contact Categories Push 3rd Party Applications to device Device Tracking, Monitoring, Reporting Updates to Software are about every year or two as opposed to quarterly with others. Inline Message Fetch Fetch emails from mail subfolders on first sync. A few of these are fixed in WinMob 6.1 and Exchange 2007 -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Define feature-less ?? -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones I agree, Windows Mobile will get you there, and fast, but it's a little cumbersome and feature-less. Read some of my posts in the archives about Windows Mobile in a thread titled SmartPhones...To sum it up, if you go Windows Mobile, look for devices that are version 6.1 I would recommend BB or a product called Good Messaging (Runs on most all phone platforms). Both are set and forget. Both also have hosted services, if you don't feel like running another server. But, like John said, the hardware requirements are minimal. FYI, the costs for the license and support of Good Messaging for our business is a couple bucks a month per cell phone line. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones It really depends on several factors - how many users? Firewall configuration? Actual need - just incredible e-mail or do you actually need all of the other bells and whistles? Yes BES costs a little and requires a server but once its set up you can basically forget about it until you need to add another user or something of that nature. I consider the BB far superior when it comes to providing e-mail for ID10Ts on the road. I have it installed on an 8 yr old repurposed Dell workstation with no issues. YMMV John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberries or Windows CE phones If you want the least headaches possible, then run Windows Mobile with ActiveSync, which should work fine with Exchange 2003. Blackberry does, in fact, require another server. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation -Original Message- From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberries or Windows CE phones Hi, We currently have a SBS 2003 server running Exchange 2003. We are planning to migrate to Exchange 2007, however, I don't have a timeline for that migration yet. In the meantime, I've been asked about phones and the costs for making them to work with our current Exchange server. My assumption is that Blackberries require a Blackberry server and apart of the cost, could be a headache. My guess is that Windows CE is probably better suited to work together with Exchange. Do We need something special to make it to run? Any other recommendations? I want as less headaches as possible :) Thanks, Miguel __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! Disfruta de una bandeja de entrada más inteligente. http://es.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http
RE: Question about Exchange 2007 Transport Rules
What problem are you trying to solve? From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Question about Exchange 2007 Transport Rules In the Exchange 2007 transport rules, are Contacts considered to be Inside the organization, or Outside the organization? ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Question about Exchange 2007 Transport Rules
So your problem is that you really need to find a new job, because your ducks are drinking water outside of some toxic waste dump or something, and they have done nuts. So they want an internal only email system, except for a few people? And or a few external addresses. Why did they even get Exchange 2007? You can turn on off all SMTP email for X users if you want. Do your ducks also block web access, and cell phone usage in the building? From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Question about Exchange 2007 Transport Rules Mgmt decided that sending/receiving internet email was too much of a distractionfor some people, so they asked for a way to keep them from sending or receiving email from outside the org. No problem, create a DL, add a couple of transport rules, and it's done. Then they started coming up with exceptions. From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Question about Exchange 2007 Transport Rules What problem are you trying to solve? From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Question about Exchange 2007 Transport Rules In the Exchange 2007 transport rules, are Contacts considered to be Inside the organization, or Outside the organization? ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: reclaiming space
Move everyone else out to a new database, then delete the old one. From: SMREKAR, JACK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: reclaiming space I have moved a couple hundred mailboxes from one Exchange server to another in hopes of reclaiming some space on the first server. In all so far I have moved about 120 gig of mailboxes to the other server but I do not see that space coming back on the first server. I do run the online maintenance of the databases that is built inside of the system manager. I also get emails nightly on what was done. Below is one that I got last night. I was under the impression that Exchange would clean itself up after the moves and allow the database to shrink after it ran the maintenance. Do I have something set wrong or is my thinking wrong. If my thinking is wrong do I need to do an offline defrag to get the space back? The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 2008-03-25 02:58:14 Stopped at: 2008-03-25 03:48:49 Mailboxes processed:549 Messages that would be moved or deleted: 26523 Size of messages that would be moved or deleted: 125576.70 MB Jack Smrekar Appleton Area School District 920-993-7062 Ext. 2123 A+ N+ Server + [cid:image001.gif@01C88E5D.E80789D0] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~inline: image001.gif
RE: Cluster Server
When you stop being a DC/GC IIS is pretty much removed. Exchange stores some stuff in the IIS Metabase, so all that exchange relies on in Metabase goes away. Additionally it is not really a good (supported) idea to cluster a Domain controller. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cluster Server Last I heard, it's not recommended to have Exchange on a DC. However, if you already do, don't just demote the server. You have to uninstall Exchange from that box first, or you'll get into a very difficult situationisn't that right Don? Joe Heaton From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Cluster Server Hi All I have two questions: Is there any issue to have your exchange 03 server be a domain controller and a global catalog at the same time? I am looking to purchase a new additional server Exchange 03 server to make a cluster for instant failover in case the main mail server goes offline. What are my options? Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Cluster Server
How about you just fix the first issue. Sounds like a MUCH more simple solution. When you call Microsoft they will work your incident until it is fixed, I have had some cases open for over 4 months. If you have an AD connection issue tossing more servers at it will not fix it. From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cluster Server My problem is that Microsoft escalated group couldn't figure out why Exchange 03 box losses communication with my 2 global catalogs which causes a crash on the Information Store. I am very confused with whats going on but so is Microsoft. Which is why I decided to purchase an additional server and install Exchange 03 and setup a cluster with the primary. I wanted to make the cluster a DC and a global catalog so that it could get all of the AD updates preventing the crash. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 2:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cluster Server When you stop being a DC/GC IIS is pretty much removed. Exchange stores some stuff in the IIS Metabase, so all that exchange relies on in Metabase goes away. Additionally it is not really a good (supported) idea to cluster a Domain controller. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cluster Server Last I heard, it's not recommended to have Exchange on a DC. However, if you already do, don't just demote the server. You have to uninstall Exchange from that box first, or you'll get into a very difficult situationisn't that right Don? Joe Heaton From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Cluster Server Hi All I have two questions: Is there any issue to have your exchange 03 server be a domain controller and a global catalog at the same time? I am looking to purchase a new additional server Exchange 03 server to make a cluster for instant failover in case the main mail server goes offline. What are my options? Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.comhttp://www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange Management Shell killed the CDO star
I just spilled a 16oz glass of ice water on my lap.. does that make you happy? -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 8:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Management Shell killed the CDO star I won't be happy until I can do it in perl... Heh. On 3/19/08, Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See what happens when the penguin gets it's flippers into something? We go from a decent GUI back to C/Korn/Bash-shell scripting. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems FOB Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium - 717.633.3823 Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832 A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the Stars and Stripes. Woodrow Wilson -Original Message- From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 6:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Management Shell killed the CDO star Currently where I work we are using Exchange 2003. I have written some VB code that uses CDO and CDOEXM to create mailboxes for new users. Another process creates new accounts in active directory, and my code goes through all the accounts, sees what department they are in, goes to a lookup table to figure out if the department they are in gets mailboxes on our servers (some departments have their own servers so we leave them alone). Now I go to the Microsoft Upgrading skills from Exchange 2003 to 2007 class and I am introduced to the horror of the exchange management shell. I want to keep using CDO!!! But from what I was told, CDO will not work fully with Exchange 2007, especially since the RUS is gone. CDO, from my little experience with it so far, isn't a robust language to program with. It's more of a scripting system. Am I the only one who isn't happy with the management shell? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Message Tracking Funniness
Time zone, daylight saving? From: Andrew Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Message Tracking Funniness List, Just happened to be tracking a message and noticed that it says that the message came in at 3:33pm, which is about an hour ahead of right now. When I checked the clock on the Exchange server, it showed 2:40pm. Is this happening to anyone else? It's not a deal-breaking problem at the moment. Andrew Greene Webmaster City of Anderson 120 E Main St., Anderson, IN 46018 765-648-5947 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OWA 2007 Shared Calendars
You want a group of users to have the same calendar? Like maybe a public folder, or a SharePoint site might provide. -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA 2007 Shared Calendars Am I correct in my research that user shared calendars do not exist in OWA 2007. And that the best alternative would be a public folder. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Big 2007 migrations anyone?
Do it.. you should have no problems at all. I've done much bigger with a oneliner, and not had any issues. -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Big 2007 migrations anyone? Greetings, Has anyone pushed a medium/large migration through 2007 EMC ? I would like to queue up a mailbox migration using get-mailbox -ou org | move-mailbox -targetdatabase newserver\newdb. But I am curious if I will have issues if my org that I am moving has 900+ accounts with ~300 gbs of email. Anybody pipe this much stuff at move-mailbox yet? So far all my little locations are 200 users. BTW command will be executed on the newserver (64bit 2003, 4gb Ram, new db location is FC SAN). Thanks Troy ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook suddenly extremely slow
How many Items do you have in the folders?? -Original Message- From: Jiri Kukol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 9:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook suddenly extremely slow Outlook 2007 on a Vista box (connecting to E2k3) is suddenly extremely slow and when I leave it open overnight I end up with a message that it could not configure the offline file. I have tried to disable offline folders, disable cached mode, I disabled anti-virus, I have even created a new profile but nothing seems to work. I can at best type a few words before Outlook becomes Not Responding. I don't think the problem is with the server as I can easily access email for the same user from a different computer (running a different version of Outlook but otherwise with a similar setup). Nothing else seems to be wrong with this computer and I cannot find any relevant entries anywhere in the log files. Any suggestions what I should look at? Thanks. Jiri K. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Vista SP1
It takes a very long time to install, it was quicker when I upgraded my servers at home, then it seems to be right now while I am upgrading my desktop. Michael is right, those of us who have access to it have no rights to distribute it. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Vista SP1 Microsoft reserves the right to distribute its software. That's why even patch-CD/DVD sites have to force the downloads directly from Microsoft. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Vista SP1 I think he just wants the service pack... Shook http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Vista SP1 That would be illegal. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Victor Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Vista SP1 Does anyone have access to Vista SP1 they can post on a FTP site for Download Not the release candidate the full version Victor Rodriguez Inter America Data Florida LLC 1987 NW 88 Court Suite 201 Doral, Fl 33172 Office # (305)443-0331 x1201 Cell # (786)282-4838 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
second Short
Due to popular demand, the Second Shot offer has been extended through June 30, 2008! For a limited time, you can take advantage of this free offer-a second shot at any IT professional, developer, or Microsoft Dynamics certification exam. Just register for this offer before your first exam, and you will get two chances to pass. But this offer won't last forever. http://forums.slickdeals.net/showthread.php?t=726846p=9873744highlight=#post9873744 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKMMAShttp://www.wlkmmas.org ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Anyone using CCR in production?
Yes. 30 100GB Not really works great Yes they are separated by 70 miles. I am using SCR to back it all up. From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 10:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Anyone using CCR in production? Curious to know what folks have seen in the field when using CCR. How many users, how large are your databases, any issues you've encountered. Any geo-dispersed clusters, special quorum configs, and how are you backing all of it up? thanks! -alex ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Anyone using CCR in production?
I've done 2 projects recently where the customers had limited clustering experience but they'd been sold big SANs and wanted to use them for SCC apparently the SAN sales guys are way better than I am because both customers ended up with SCC in the end. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production? 30K+ users, 2 GB hard limits, individual databases limited to 100 GB. Geodispersion is coming, using Windows Server 2008. Backup is LCR to cheap disk. I'm seeing more folks moving away from clustering with LCR and SCR. Good riddance, in my opinion. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Anyone using CCR in production? Curious to know what folks have seen in the field when using CCR. How many users, how large are your databases, any issues you've encountered. Any geo-dispersed clusters, special quorum configs, and how are you backing all of it up? thanks! -alex ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: RPC-Http Access
I love that solution!!! ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsoft, now powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 2:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RPC-Http Access One or two firings generally takes care of problems like this. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Jason Benway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 4:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RPC-Http Access We got RPC-Https working and were running up instructions on how-to configure outlook 2003. Then we starting thinking that people could use the directions to setup their own PC or other non-company asset to pull a copy of all their emails. Is there anyway to stop people from using non-company assets to access RPC-Http? thanks,jb ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Email de-duplicator?
I am impressed that they can sell a product that you don't need, and that they have been doing it for so long. They automate putting underwear on, in a very sexy way that makes people want to buy it. In real life it is much simpler to put your underwear on yourself. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKhttp://pics.wlkmmas.org/MMAShttp://www.hedonists.ca/ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 12:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email de-duplicator? It's existence... On Jan 2, 2008 12:49 PM, Tom Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whatcha got against GoExchange? From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Email de-duplicator? All, CEO has several external addresses forwarding to his internal Exchange 2003\OL 2003 account and there are a lot of duplicate emails in his mailbox. I'm researching root cause but I the mean time, he is requesting some utility/automated way to de-dup his inbox. Googling now but wanted to ping the collective as well? 3 rd party is OK...as long as its not GoExchange J Shook http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion
Security it like cloths. Some people think that dresses should be at the ankles, the knees, or just below the panty line. All lengths work to cover up a minimum required amount of skin, and you will get plenty of people who argue the benefits of each length, and claim that another length is nuts. Personally I am happy with SSL for OWA, and Windows Mobile and feel that is more than enough. I am sure that others would tell me that I need a windows VPN. Someone else might take it further and tell me that I need a Cisco VPN, or take it another step further and tell me that I need smart card authentication for my VPN. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsoft, now powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Apparently our WM POC was setup by MS - who feels it is unnecessary and that ISA is sufficient. (wasn't my choice or responsibility) -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 6:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion So you don't set you WM device to do the same? We do. -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Yes. Lots internally and at times externally - through a reverse proxy with 2 factor authentication or VPN. - Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Fri Dec 28 06:50:30 2007 Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion 3. Do you use OWA? From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:27 PM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion 1) yes, and notes as well as GAL lookup. WM generally yes but can't say about tasks or notes and I personally prefer the BB's GAL lookup - with a large GAL like ours, this is important. 2) Generally yes, but to be fair, MS office docs MAY be more compatible on the WM devices just due to the same vendor. 3) Security - BES has server initiated outbound connection - WM requires exposing your Exchange environment at least partially to the internet. BB intranet web site access via BES without allowing direct internet access is included. From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:27 AM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion I've started a new thread, because my manager is now asking me to create a proposal document for our Director, in order to recommend the best solution. I have a few specific questions that may or may not have been covered in the last thread. 1) Does the BB, if I have BES installed in my server room, allow sync of contacts/tasks/calendar etc. Also, just to be fair and complete, does the WM device have this capability? 2) Does the BB have the same ability to open the same types of attachments as the WM device? 3) Are there any other functionalities that one device has over the other, from an end-user perspective, that would be something I need to know about? I'm sorry if the last question is a bit vague, but this is really my first endeavor in these waters, and I'd just like to have as many real world experiences as possible to draw from to make this decision. I do understand that it's not difficult to support both, but I just need to make sure the endusers are going to be satisfied with the chosen solution. Thanks, Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.11/1200 - Release Date: 12/27/2007 1:34 PM ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion
Why must you say email is better on the BB? My wife has the 6800, loves it. ( I wish I would have waited for it to come out and get it instead of my Samsung i780) My son got her old 6700, and keeps trying to scheme ways to steal the 6800. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKhttp://pics.wlkmmas.org/MMAShttp://www.hedonists.ca/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Definetly check out the new VX6800. I have a few friends who picked one up and its hands down better than the 6700. I am very tempted to drop my BB and go back to WM. Miss the touchscreen and HTML Email. I will say that the email functionality of the BB is much better than the WM. Greg From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion I definitely will. So, as I understand it, the recommended devices are: WM - Treo 700wx BB - Curve (if available), and 8830 if the Curve is not available. I've spoken with my manager, and she agrees with me that we should pursue getting one of each device, for me to trial, so I may end up walking around with 3 phones on my belt soon...lol. Joe Heaton From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Cook - well, there ya go Joe - test out your rep ;) From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion I saw that too, but we have a couple here... On Dec 27, 2007 10:45 AM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really? - even the blackberry.comhttp://blackberry.com/ site does not show a Verizon Curve. From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:15 AM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Talk to your Verizon rep, I don't see them listed but I know they have them because we have users who have them... On Dec 27, 2007 10:11 AM, exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com wrote: Well, unfortunately, the Curve is not listed on Verizon's website for BB devices. Joe Heaton From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:10 AM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion You're missing the curve off of your list which has a full qwerty keyboard. The 8830 would be my other choice. I don't like the pearl because it's not full qwerty... On Dec 27, 2007 10:06 AM, exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com wrote: Any BB model that people would recommend over others? Our provider lists the following on their site: 7130e Pearl 8130 8703e 8830 World Edition Thanks, Joe Heaton From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:34 AM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion 1. Yes 2. Yes, excedt BB doesn't do so hot on PDF's yet 3. BB User proof, WM not so much On Dec 27, 2007 9:27 AM, exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com wrote: I've started a new thread, because my manager is now asking me to create a proposal document for our Director, in order to recommend the best solution. I have a few specific questions that may or may not have been covered in the last thread. 1) Does the BB, if I have BES installed in my server room, allow sync of contacts/tasks/calendar etc. Also, just to be fair and complete, does the WM device have this capability? 2) Does the BB have the same ability to open the same types of attachments as the WM device? 3) Are there any other functionalities that one device has over the other, from an end-user
RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion
Done.. and Done.. Then I installed lemonade tycoon for both of them. They are trying to see who can do better. So far CL is in the lead. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKhttp://pics.wlkmmas.org/MMAShttp://www.hedonists.ca/ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Just get a WM6 ROM for the 6700 and his will be better than hers!! :P On Dec 28, 2007 8:15 AM, Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why must you say email is better on the BB? My wife has the 6800, loves it. ( I wish I would have waited for it to come out and get it instead of my Samsung i780) My son got her old 6700, and keeps trying to scheme ways to steal the 6800. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKhttp://pics.wlkmmas.org/MMAShttp://www.hedonists.ca/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Definetly check out the new VX6800. I have a few friends who picked one up and its hands down better than the 6700. I am very tempted to drop my BB and go back to WM. Miss the touchscreen and HTML Email. I will say that the email functionality of the BB is much better than the WM. Greg From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion I definitely will. So, as I understand it, the recommended devices are: WM - Treo 700wx BB - Curve (if available), and 8830 if the Curve is not available. I've spoken with my manager, and she agrees with me that we should pursue getting one of each device, for me to trial, so I may end up walking around with 3 phones on my belt soon...lol. Joe Heaton From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Cook - well, there ya go Joe - test out your rep ;) From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion I saw that too, but we have a couple here... On Dec 27, 2007 10:45 AM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really? - even the blackberry.comhttp://blackberry.com/ site does not show a Verizon Curve. From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:15 AM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Talk to your Verizon rep, I don't see them listed but I know they have them because we have users who have them... On Dec 27, 2007 10:11 AM, exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com wrote: Well, unfortunately, the Curve is not listed on Verizon's website for BB devices. Joe Heaton From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:10 AM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion You're missing the curve off of your list which has a full qwerty keyboard. The 8830 would be my other choice. I don't like the pearl because it's not full qwerty... On Dec 27, 2007 10:06 AM, exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com wrote: Any BB model that people would recommend over others? Our provider lists the following on their site: 7130e Pearl 8130 8703e 8830 World Edition Thanks, Joe Heaton From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:34 AM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion 1. Yes 2. Yes, excedt BB doesn't do so hot
RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion
Such details me Son, what did you do at school today son nothing, what's for dinner me food son seriously, what are we having me seriously, what did you do at school today son finally gives some details. Note : I've been in bed with the Windows Mobile, and Mobile Device Manager teams for the past few months doing stuff I'm going to feed most of the positive / negative comments in this thread back to those teams one way or another. [1] [1] Ya'll are making me sounds more smarter and informed ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKhttp://pics.wlkmmas.org/MMAShttp://www.hedonists.ca/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Its just easier. Its not bad on a WM device at all, just better on a BB. From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Why must you say email is better on the BB? My wife has the 6800, loves it. ( I wish I would have waited for it to come out and get it instead of my Samsung i780) My son got her old 6700, and keeps trying to scheme ways to steal the 6800. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS Formerly of Microsofthttp://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, now powered by 3Sharphttp://www.3sharp.com/, Always WLKhttp://pics.wlkmmas.org/MMAShttp://www.hedonists.ca/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Definetly check out the new VX6800. I have a few friends who picked one up and its hands down better than the 6700. I am very tempted to drop my BB and go back to WM. Miss the touchscreen and HTML Email. I will say that the email functionality of the BB is much better than the WM. Greg From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion I definitely will. So, as I understand it, the recommended devices are: WM - Treo 700wx BB - Curve (if available), and 8830 if the Curve is not available. I've spoken with my manager, and she agrees with me that we should pursue getting one of each device, for me to trial, so I may end up walking around with 3 phones on my belt soon...lol. Joe Heaton From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Cook - well, there ya go Joe - test out your rep ;) From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion I saw that too, but we have a couple here... On Dec 27, 2007 10:45 AM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really? - even the blackberry.comhttp://blackberry.com/ site does not show a Verizon Curve. From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:15 AM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Talk to your Verizon rep, I don't see them listed but I know they have them because we have users who have them... On Dec 27, 2007 10:11 AM, exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com wrote: Well, unfortunately, the Curve is not listed on Verizon's website for BB devices. Joe Heaton From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:10 AM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion You're missing the curve off of your list which has a full qwerty keyboard. The 8830 would be my other choice. I don't like the pearl because it's not full qwerty... On Dec 27, 2007 10:06 AM, exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com wrote: Any BB model that people would recommend over others? Our provider lists the following on their site: 7130e Pearl 8130 8703e 8830 World Edition Thanks, Joe Heaton From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
I think they are the simplest to perform. But the outcome is not always the prettiest. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Ya... In-place upgrades suck. Let us know how Saturday goes. -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story This is just an informational post, you're welcome to comment on it but I'm not really asking any questions. Just thought folks out there getting ready to upgrade might want to hear the story. I just spent the night upgrading (or trying to upgrade) my exchange 5.5 server. We have a very simple network. 1 domain. 200 users. 1 exchange server. 2 domain controllers (not the exchange server). Started about 2 weeks ago prepping for upgrade. Armed with: White Paper in-place upgrade from msoft exchange 5.5 to msoft exchange 2000 Q316886 How To: Migrate from exchange server 5.5 to exchange 2000 server Q282309 upgrading exchange server 5.5 service pack 4 to exchange 2000 server Q295922 considerations when you upgrade to exchange 2000 server Q296260 how to configure a two-way recipient connection agreement for exchange server 5.5 users Q253829 description of the active directory connector deletion mechanism And, of course, monitored this list (and the sun-exchange) one for upgrade ideas! Now some of the documents have conflicting information. If you weed thru the dates and such you can usually figure out what is really true. For example, the white paper states you MUST have at least one domain running in native mode, but the HOW TO describes a scenario where all domains are in mixed mode. With the domain controllers upgraded to win2k active directory (mixed mode) last month I tackled the exchange upgrade this month. Went thru the white paper and how to, updating the schema (forestprep and domainprep) and ran all the tests listed in those docs to verify it was working. Got exactly the results they told me! First time I ran the actual upgrade got my first rude surprise. My vendor had shipped me the Exchange 2000 standard edition media (which doesn't really say standard on it, just Exchange 2000) and the upgrade process stopped immediately with You can't go from enterprise to standard you idiot Two days later I have the correct media. Take the server off the network and run an online backup (Veritas backup exec with exchange option). Verify the backup worked. With exchange services down get back on the network and run domain tests again. Everything ok! Run the upgrade! The upgrade goes thru several processes but hangs at Setup failed while installing sub-component Site Replication Service with error code 0xC007041D -- retry or cancel search MS knowledge base and looks like a permissions issue (Q278254 and Q273730). Hmm, make sure the exchange service account has all the permissions and click retry. Still no work. Rats. Getting late so time to make the $250 call to PSS! PSS steps me thru lots of stuff, nothing works. They have me change the service account user permissions at the ORG container from CUSTOM to SERVICE ACCOUNT (i'm probably not saying this exactly correct). Still no joy. Try to cancel out of that error message. Nada. Have to task manager/shut down process. They then refer me to the ultimate nightmare: Q264309 - How to Roll Back A failed Upgraded from Exchange Server 5.5. to Exchange 2000. Yuck. Go into registry and delete the stuff, rename the exchsrvr folders, uninstall IIS, restart server, install IIS, re-apply all service packs and hotfixes (that really sucks), delete the renamed exchsrvr folders, setup /r exchange 5.5, restore directory and info store. Restoring directory service doesn't work. Call PSS back. Directory service was trying to start and got hung, can't restore to hung service. Change to manual start and reboot. Directory restores!!! Restore info store. (8 gigs). 2 hours later ready to go! (almost) Now the internet mail connector isn't working. Dawn is breaking and panic begins to creep in. Users will be screaming in about 2 hours. Call PSS again. End up deleting the IMC and creating a new one. They very patiently step me through lots of good stuff, including making sure I'm not an internet relay and that I'm not doing circular logs. They even stand by while I reinstall my Anti-virus for exchange. Everything is working. It's now 7am and I'm back to my original pre-upgrade status from 7pm the night before. Problem summary: PSS thinks that the problem was caused by the mail service account user not having complete permissions at the org
RE: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List
Title: Message can you try again in very plain English? no clue what you are trying to do. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 12:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: E2K: Importing Filtered Message List Hi All, Is there any way to bulk import a list of email addressed to be filtered (blocked) to the E2K Message Delivery Filter list? Best Regards, JMU Jim Underwood List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: IT staff behavior
I think that would be a great idea.. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IT staff behavior unfortunatly-- I have to do both. Our agency is in between sizes where it's too small to have 2 seperate departments, but it's growing and becoming a pain in the ass sometimes for us 2 people who have to help everyone, administer the network, troubleshoot the phone system, etc.. I'm not complaining, it keeps me busy, but this non-profit is the largest in the county and getting bigger, and is becoming more and more of a handful everyday. Maybe I can get a part time individual from our Americorps division who is somewhat tech savvy to do the helpdesk stuff-- what do you think? :) paul green seattle -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:59 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: IT staff behavior Subject: Re: IT staff behavior Help desk s*cks. I prefer the infrastructure/implementation/development side. Too big a dose of users will make you sick - Original Message - From: Dan Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 4:53 PM Subject: RE: IT staff behavior Read http://www.techtales.com for the answer... -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: IT staff behavior You would think. But then again some people think that just because they have job that they can't be replaced. Which really kinds of pisses me off because I have friends who are qualified (probably over qualified) that would be happy to work again. Even if it was a help desk position. Which brings up the point of, if they don't want to help people with their issues, why did they get into this business in the first place? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: IT staff behavior
D N D ! --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IT staff behavior hahaha niiice.. yeah exactly. I'll be sitting here coding asp for the new inhouse website and employee database front end, and then my phone rings because they don't know how to put their outlook toolbars back into the window that they accidently drug out into floating mode. at this point i just want to shoot myself in the face hehe -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:43 AM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: IT staff behavior Subject: Re: IT staff behavior Oh, I feel your pain Paul. I have to do both too. I was not implying that I have moved out of tha tmode. The worst thing is when you are deep in thought on a project, and have to get up every ten minutes because some freak wants to change their email stationery or something... - Original Message - From: Garland Mac Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:36 AM Subject: RE: IT staff behavior I feel for you, we have the same situation here. -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IT staff behavior unfortunatly-- I have to do both. Our agency is in between sizes where it's too small to have 2 seperate departments, but it's growing and becoming a pain in the ass sometimes for us 2 people who have to help everyone, administer the network, troubleshoot the phone system, etc.. I'm not complaining, it keeps me busy, but this non-profit is the largest in the county and getting bigger, and is becoming more and more of a handful everyday. Maybe I can get a part time individual from our Americorps division who is somewhat tech savvy to do the helpdesk stuff-- what do you think? :) paul green seattle -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:59 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: IT staff behavior Subject: Re: IT staff behavior Help desk s*cks. I prefer the infrastructure/implementation/development side. Too big a dose of users will make you sick - Original Message - From: Dan Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 4:53 PM Subject: RE: IT staff behavior Read http://www.techtales.com for the answer... -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: IT staff behavior You would think. But then again some people think that just because they have job that they can't be replaced. Which really kinds of pisses me off because I have friends who are qualified (probably over qualified) that would be happy to work again. Even if it was a help desk position. Which brings up the point of, if they don't want to help people with their issues, why did they get into this business in the first place? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Would you suggest they flash him instead? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Powerpoint is so last millenium. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! You don't have people sending the junk to your text pager or cell phone, then. I like powerpoint presentations, too, I just don't want my electric company deciding that it's a good medium for my monthly bill. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! After reading the evils of HTML email: http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml I still like it. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
Fiction. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise I'm trying to get a straight answer on this one. My MS reseller seems to be confused on this. Currently have Exchange 5.5 Standard and would like to move to 5.5 Enterprise. I've searched the list archives. I thought I read here that 5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Standard CD. Is this fact or fiction? Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Add all Contacts to Messenger Automatically
I remember the help file talking about a util or script to do this?? But I have been known to be wrong. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Ren Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Add all Contacts to Messenger Automatically I just deployed Exchange Instant Messenger and was wondering if there is a way to include everyone in the company on the contact list for everyone's messenger client? Basically what I'm looking for is a new user installing messenger and not having to add each person individually. I tried to pull the info from the registry and add the key file through a script, but the key folder name is the user's name and %username% doesn't work for a key. Can someone help? I guess the only other way I know of would be to create a VB script which would rewrite the .reg file for each person as they are logging on pulling the user's name through %username% (by batch script) and adding it to the new .reg file in the appropriate place. Anyone got a better idea, please let me know. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: major problem
Title: Message Need more info.. what happens when you try to start the system attendant? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: major problem i had a server whose exchanage services wont start after the server booted. it tells me the service is disabled (which its not) or its missing hardware... anyone ever see this? Event Type:ErrorEvent Source:Service Control ManagerEvent Category:NoneEvent ID:7001Date:7/15/2002Time:1:43:11 PMUser:N/AComputer:SERVERDescription:The Microsoft Exchange Directory service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which failed to start because of the following error: The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled devices associated with it. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Information Store Maintenance
You can get a good guess by looking at free space on the drive that is reported correctly. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance As long as the file is opened, you don't see the change in Windows Explorer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance I was concerned that I would not be able to monitor the size of the database. I was checking it using explorer and it has steadily maintained 10-11GB. I never worried about it. Now that it is 15.5GB I became more concerned. -Original Message- From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Hello, Instead of suspecting that you have whitespace, why not check the event log? event ID 1221 if I remember correctly... not to mention what other have eluded to: -mute point if you have 5 gigs of free space and not over 16gb limit -lots of downtime-risk -what problem do you think will be solved? PLUS- at least this way, Exchange wont have to use cycles to resize the DB as it grows... Thank you, Patrick MHR(Michael Ross) To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance 07/10/2002 12:22 PM Please respond to MS-Exchange Admin Issues AMEN BRUTHA!! -Original Message- From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance I ran it on two different servers that had been running for 3 years. Each IS was around 32 GB. It took about 3 hours and was 5 GB when it was finished. The biggest improvement was that the backup didn't use 32GB of space on the tapes every night. George -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance It should take you about 2-3 hours. Our database is 27 GB in size and im going to defrag it this weekend. I should be able to shrink it to about 25 GB -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Think he may be worried about bumping the 16 gig limit for non enterprise??? Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance You don't need to run this utility. Exchange maintains itself - are you having problems that you believe will be resolved? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Information Store Maintenance Greetings Knowledgeable Exchange Admins Our Exch5.5/SP4 WNT4.0/SP6 information store is beefed up to 15.5GB. I was planning to run the ESEUTIL to clean up the database. I suspect there is a lot of space that can be
RE: Information Store Maintenance
Title: Message is great to benefit from others mistakes.. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store Maintenance HA! Where do you think we get our knowledge? :P -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store Maintenance But nothing compares to this list.. Thanks to all for your suggestions and comments. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store Maintenance support.microsoft.com has almost all the answers that technet does... :P -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Thanks! You answered that faster then I could get my TechNet booted up! -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store Maintenance XADM: How to Run Eseutil on a Computer Without Exchange Server (Q244525) http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q244525 William -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Can I copy the database to another machine, and run ESEUTIL on that machine? Can I just copy the utility or do I need to install exchange on this other machine? -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Just make sure you have enough disk space free on the drive that the priv.edb is on, MS recommendation is 110%, so if your priv.edb is 15.5 GB you'll need to have about 16+ GB free space on that drive. Otherwise, you'll have to run it across the network and that will slow your time down considerably. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Standard Version from Back Office. Thanks -Original Message- From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance This link is the how to of the defrag utility. http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q192185 Are you running an Enterprise Version or the Standard Version? George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance I am concerned with the size of the of the PRIV. It is 15.5GB now. For the longest time it was about 10GB. Recently, someone set a rule for OOF to forward their mail to a private home account. The account was closed because the mailbox was full. The returned mail bounced back about 10,000 times. By the time it was noticed the store was already a bit chubby. Otherwise we aren't experiencing any problems. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002
RE: E2K Developer Edition
Title: Message Standard is the server, developer is the tools to write extensions and stuff for the server. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: E2K Developer Edition Can anyone tell me or provide a ref to the differences between Exchange 2000 Developer Edition and Exchange 2000 standard edition? I've searched the entire MS site, including KB, TechNet, and MSDN, and cannot find any info on this. TIA. Best Regards, JMU Jim Underwood List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
Isinteg =-patch to roll all the log files. Eseutil /m m.txt to see what the header says about the files integrity. Did you follow this?. 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery I hope you gentlemen and ladies can help me on this one. I have an Exchange 2000 Server that had 2 of the 3 disks crash that contained the database files for Exchange. IE priv.edb and pub.edb, I have since replaced the disks with new ones, Same drive letter, Same Config, ETC and I am having a heckuva time getting exchange to mount the database after the restore is complete. It absolutely refuse and gives the error An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or both. ID no: c1041724 Exchange System Manager I have tried what MS recommends VIA Q253931 and that doesn't help me because ESEUTIL Refuses to Finish. I am trying to restore it from the Backup Set right now(Again) and will post the Error that ESEUTIL gives me After it Finishes. Any ideas, pushes, prods, in the Right Direction would be most appreciated and should they let me go to MEC this year, The First Rnd of Beer is On Me. TIA Jeremiah Watson Composidie, Inc. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery
What did they have you do? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery That's ok, I wussed out and called PSS. FIgured that was about the same as the first rnd of drinks with you guys. ;-)~ Jeremiah http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q253931 (same one that you found) Sorry I could not be of more help. -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:00 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery You betcha, Lemme dig em out here. 9518 and 9519 Jeremiah Any event IDs with that ? -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 08:49 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery Yep, It was checked when I went in there to look at it. It is acting like the hard recovery was not run on it. After Running ESEUTIL /CC c:\temp which is supposed to run the hard recovery I should be able to Mnt the DB. After running ESEutil I get the following Error MEssage Operation Terminated with error -939586631(Unknown Error, Unknown Error) after 0.30 seconds. Jeremiah Have you tried this: Right-click the public folder MAPI tree, and then click Properties.=20 On the Security tab, click to select the Allow inheritable permissions = from parent to propagate to this object check box.=20 After you complete this procedure, wait for Microsoft Active = Directory(tm) directory services to replicate the change to all of the domain = controllers. After the change has been replicated, you can remount the store.=20 =A0 Mark Smith =A0 -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: July 9, 2002 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Server 2000 Recovery I hope you gentlemen and ladies can help me on this one. I have an Exchange 2000 Server that had 2 of the 3 disks crash that contained the database files for Exchange. IE priv.edb and pub.edb, I have since replaced the disks with new ones, Same drive letter, Same Config, ETC = and I am having a heckuva time getting exchange to mount the database after the restore is complete. It absolutely refuse and gives the error An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or both. ID no: c1041724=20 Exchange System Manager=20 I have tried what MS recommends VIA Q253931 and that doesn't help me because ESEUTIL Refuses to Finish. I am trying to restore it from the Backup Set right now(Again) and will post the Error that ESEUTIL gives = me After it Finishes. Any ideas, pushes, prods, in the Right Direction would be most = appreciated and should they let me go to MEC this year, The First Rnd of Beer is On Me. TIA Jeremiah Watson Composidie, Inc. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Conference
Title: Message I will be your DD. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference I told my wife that even though I am only about 10 miles from there, I may need a room if she wants me to stay alive. BTW, I found some dive bars -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Who needs those if we're in walking distance... Unless we need some designated body carriers... :P -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Designated driver!!! -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Ummm, probably not since I don't partake in alcoholic beverages... Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Can you handle your alcohol? -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Yes, that E for Enterprise, was one of my "selling" points :) Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Plus MEC isn't just for Exchange anymore. They changed the E to mean Enterprise. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Nothing particularly Exchange specific as this per say... -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange Conference I've just about gotten my leadership convinced that I need to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct. The question that I've been asked is to find out if there are any OTHER Exchange conferences that will be offered. Other than some 1/2 day Tech Net briefings related to Exchange, I've found nothing searching on Microsoft's event site. Do yall know of any other Exchange conference going on in the next 6 - 9 months anywhere that would offer as much as or more information than MEC2002? Hey, my lead knows that I participate in this here list, so he'll want to know if you guys know of anything else. (Actually, he wants me to go, it's our CTO that is asking if there's something else available.)Thanks yall! (Yall is Texan for you all, all of you, yous guys etc) Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList
RE: OWA to Multiple Exchange 5.5 Server from one IIS4 Server (Que stio n)
Title: Message advanced sever load balancing with win2k. would do that. Or round robin DNS. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: David Elebute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA to Multiple Exchange 5.5 Server from one IIS4 Server (Que stio n) What if we want to setup one web page with different redirects to each exchange box? For example, I want the page http://mydomain.com/ili to point to one exchange server then http://mydomain.com/stb to another exchange server; how is this accomplished? David Elebute Director of MIS SuperClubs (MCP,CCNA) U.S. Office 954.925.0925 Ext. 5631 or 800.467.8737 JA - 800.417.5288 Ext. 5631 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] U.S. Pager: 954.831.0677 and [EMAIL PROTECTED] U.S. Cellular Phone: 954.803.5790 JA Cellular Phone: 876.995.6476 BR Cellular Phone: 5571-91223890 Fax: 954.921.7105 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of SuperClubs. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender. -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 02:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA to Multiple Exchange 5.5 Server from one IIS4 Server (Que stio n) It will automatically allow this as long as the users from the other domains have the rights to login locally to the IIS box. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The beatings will continue until morale improves... -Original Message-From: David Elebute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA to Multiple Exchange 5.5 Server from one IIS4 Server (Questio n) Does anyone know where I can find some documentation on how to setup OWA pointing to several different Exchange 5.5 servers while only residing on one IIS 4.0 server? I have been looking through TechNet with no success. Please advise if you know how to accomplish. All responses are greatly appreciated, David Elebute Director of MIS SuperClubs (MCP,CCNA) List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Move user to new recipient container
Title: Message yes there is a way but it is not pretty... http://www.mvps.org/exchange/containermove_frames.htm --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: MACBETH, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Move user to new recipient container I am looking for a way to move a user between recipient containers without exporting mail, deleting the mailbox, creating a new mailbox, importing the mail into the new mailbox and assigning the old X500 address. Is there any way for this to be done through raw mode by changing certain attributes? Searching for this in Technet has brought me nothing, but I suspect it would require just the right wording in a search. If someone has a method, does this work when moving a user between sites also? Exchange 5.5 SP3 and SP4 on NT 4 SP6a Thanks, Randy List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Move user to new recipient container
Title: Message From a management view more then one container is a bad idea no matter how your org is setup. you can use address book views and the likes to make it seamless to the users. if you need more OU's then an upgrade to exchange2k would very much be in your interest. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: MACBETH, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Move user to new recipient container Thanks for reaffirming what I expected. Unfortunately with multiple sites and multiple companies, a single container isn't an ideal solution either. -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Move user to new recipient container yes there is a way but it is not pretty... http://www.mvps.org/exchange/containermove_frames.htm --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: MACBETH, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Move user to new recipient container I am looking for a way to move a user between recipient containers without exporting mail, deleting the mailbox, creating a new mailbox, importing the mail into the new mailbox and assigning the old X500 address. Is there any way for this to be done through raw mode by changing certain attributes? Searching for this in Technet has brought me nothing, but I suspect it would require just the right wording in a search. If someone has a method, does this work when moving a user between sites also? Exchange 5.5 SP3 and SP4 on NT 4 SP6a Thanks, Randy List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Wanted: Plain text email client
I too am very often 19.2 it is not too bad for a 6x8 TS window.. But nothing much more is worth anything. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Wanted: Plain text email client 19,2 is really hard. I still have a PDA with a 28,8 modem which is already slow. This plain text e-mail was before I hit reply only 5KB BTW ;-) That's what I hate. They sell your (and my) e-mail addy for $5 apiece to each SPAM'er who wants it and we don't get a single $ :-( Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 12:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Wanted: Plain text email client I was at 19,2 dial up for 4 long months in 2002. I appreciate #4 as well. Of course this plain text email will exceed 12k already. ;) I don't get $5 for the addresses I sell. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 3:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Wanted: Plain text email client Plain text is for hard core paranoids like me and not dull ;-) If you're on a dialup line #4 is a big issue, also #4 is once you look at the source code of HTML mails created with a certain mail client. Sometimes the item is double in size :-( I don't need a 10kb mail with a short notice which would be 1kb if plain text... The real issue with web bugs is that once you red the message even in preview your mail address has been confirmed and the SPAM'ers are happy to sell your confirmed address for $5 to get you flooded with their fine mails ;-) Also, Yahoo! For example uses Web beacons to track the usage of their groups. Each message contains a sponsor footer which actually tracks your TCP/IP to keep Yahoo! informed who is using this group :-0 Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 11:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Wanted: Plain text email client Yes, really. I've never had a problem with an HTML email bug. The little .gif call to a web server to track email, well, I track the emails I receive that do that. The problem is a non-issue to me personally. For example, only item#1 and #7 are even relevant to me in this list: http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml Plain text email is dull. :o) -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Wanted: Plain text email client Ugh! Really? With all the Web beacons and bugs buried in HTML mail to track if you really open such a mail I finally decided to turn my Office XP SP1/Outlook 2002 into displaying all mail only as plain text... Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 10:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Wanted: Plain text email client Personally, I like HTML email. But: http://nohtmlemail.com/ William -Original Message- From: Rob Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Wanted: Plain text email client Hi folks, I just wondered if someone could recommend a really straight forward simple email client, which handles plain text emails. I don't want it to be able to do HTML mail, either sending or receiving. Thanks Rob List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Circular logging?
Ummm... No! NO! Mapi for you 2 weeks.. You must use PINE! --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Circular logging? I don't have any loose data, so can I use circular logging? ;-) -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 26 June 2002 15:34 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Circular logging? Subject: RE: Circular logging? A mail box server will benefit for the ability to have a roll forward recovery. Where you can restore from Back then roll the current logs from the time of back up against the database. Thus loosing no data. A gateway server that has no mailboxes on it, And is only really doing routing or relaying does not need to have that ability, in that case Circular logging is recommended. For what you are doing circular logging is bad. Just go get another drive. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Kahn, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Circular logging? Do you care to elaborate on that? Stuart K. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 June 2002 15:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Circular logging? There are very few circumstances where Circular logging is a good idea. It's a particularly bad idea on a server which contains mailboxes. Kevin -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 June 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Circular logging? Do you recommend circular logging? We're trying to clear space for the transaction log files. Any ideas? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** The information in this email and any attachment or any reproduction of this email is confidential and for the use of the addressee(s) only. If received in error please advise the sender and delete all records of it from your system. Racing Champions International Limited Hembury House, Pynes Hill, Rydon Lane, Exeter, EX2 5AZ Tel: +44 (0)1392 281 900 Fax: +44 (0)1392 213 125 Registered in England No. 1634124 A List of Directors may be inspected at the Registered office as above ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory
Give SP2 for Exchange a try. Any thing in the event logs? Change anything? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: David Duke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2000 out of memory Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange 2000 SP1 Antigen dual 700MHz 1 Gb memory no other applications Lately we have been seeing a problem where Exchange memory usage grows to 100%, mail slows to a crawl then the system either hangs or reboots itself. Would appreciate any help. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory
Then reapply Sp2 for Win2k. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: David Duke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory Also I miss typed - we are on SP2. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory Give SP2 for Exchange a try. Any thing in the event logs? Change anything? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: David Duke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2000 out of memory Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange 2000 SP1 Antigen dual 700MHz 1 Gb memory no other applications Lately we have been seeing a problem where Exchange memory usage grows to 100%, mail slows to a crawl then the system either hangs or reboots itself. Would appreciate any help. Thanks List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Upgrading from 5.5 standard to 5.5 enterprise
Title: Message Just put the CD in and Go.. As always have a good backup/. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Upgrading from 5.5 standard to 5.5 enterprise I'm about to upgrade from 5.5 standard to 5.5 enterprise. Any advice/tricks?List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5
You should be fine as long you are on a member server and get all the names he same. 5.5 site and org names are case sensitive. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Zach Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange Server 5.5 Anyone know of any issues if you try to bring a new NT 4 server into a domain using the same computer name as the old server? We are planning to move our current Exchange server 5.5 to a Compaq ML370 with 3-18 gig drives running RAID 5. The plan is to shut down the old server, install NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 Enterprise ed. on the new server and use the same server name as the old. If the install goes sour we would like to be able to bring the old server back online till problems are resolved. Would we run into problems with the SIDs (or any other problems) if we attempt to bring the old server back online once the new server is joined to the domain? Also, the existing Exchange server is a BDC as will be the new one. Would appreciate any thoughts/advice. Thanks. Zach Mathew List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5
Just the machine name for the server. outlook connects based on NetBIOS name not based on SID = ] I agree Ed's move method would be much simpler. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5 What about the SIDs? Once he names that new machine the same as the old, he will blow out the old SIDs. Why do you want to keep the same server name? While that is certainly possible, there are easier methods if you are open to a new server name (which shouldn't be a problem unless you have a specific need) -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5 You should be fine as long you are on a member server and get all the names he same. 5.5 site and org names are case sensitive. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Zach Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving Exchange Server 5.5 Anyone know of any issues if you try to bring a new NT 4 server into a domain using the same computer name as the old server? We are planning to move our current Exchange server 5.5 to a Compaq ML370 with 3-18 gig drives running RAID 5. The plan is to shut down the old server, install NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 Enterprise ed. on the new server and use the same server name as the old. If the install goes sour we would like to be able to bring the old server back online till problems are resolved. Would we run into problems with the SIDs (or any other problems) if we attempt to bring the old server back online once the new server is joined to the domain? Also, the existing Exchange server is a BDC as will be the new one. Would appreciate any thoughts/advice. Thanks. Zach Mathew List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Restricting Users from sending mail
That is not old timers.. Those guys are still newbie's.. Old times were on the Banyan list, then became wobblers. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail Old Timers: People who were on here when Loveletter broke... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail Define old timers... -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Restricting Users from sending mail You know, I have never actually read our own FAQ. Damm fine piece of work. Now I see why old timers get so p*$$ed to see certain items repeated here. Thanks for the slap in the face! - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Restricting Users from sending mail M...cheese biscuits. Better yet, why not pickles and cheese?? www.picklesandcheese.com - Original Message - From: Preston Jeffares [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:54 PM Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail Thanks William... thats what I get for eating too many cheese biscuits for lunch and being lazy... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail The answer can be found here: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Restricting Users from sending mail Hrm... maybe I'm just missing it today... but isn't there a specific option to prevent select users from actually sending mail. The users need to be able to recieve mail... but not send any. I suppose I could implement a Send Message Size limit of zero... but wanted to know if there was a better way to do it. Exchange 2000 sp2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Restricting Users from sending mail
Restrict Send on the mail box at 1k. Then can receive all they want after that just not send. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail Ermm... William... the FAQ explains how to keep a user from sending AND recieving internet mail. As far as I can tell the request is for users to be able to recieve both internal and external e-mail, but not be able to send anything. I'm guessing this isn't as simple of a task as I thought it might be. Looks like the send limit is still the front runner... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting Users from sending mail Go now and send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and thank him for maintaining a FAQ. Tell him William said Hi. William -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Restricting Users from sending mail You know, I have never actually read our own FAQ. Damm fine piece of work. Now I see why old timers get so p*$$ed to see certain items repeated here. Thanks for the slap in the face! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 1029 errors
Check the sec tab in AD, make sure the little check box at the bottom is checked. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 1029 errors My Exchange 2000 server is listing hundreds of 1029 errors in the Application log. And it seems no internet e-mail is moving in or out. Here is an example of the event: [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed an operation because the user did not have the following access rights: 'Delete' 'Read Property' 'Write Property' 'Create Message' 'View Item' 'Create Subfolder' 'Write Security Descriptor' 'Write Owner' 'Read Security Descriptor' 'Contact' The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is /O=SBM COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION/OU=CORPORATE/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SKELLY. The folder ID is in the data section of this event. All the 1029 errors are all identical except for the e-mail. Anyone see this before? A quick search on Technet didn't give me any real clues. TIA Chris Bodnar List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Search utility for header info??
Didnt Isscan from the ilove you tool kit do this? Nope never mind it does attachments, brain working slow this morning. What did you want to accomplish with this ability? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Blackmer, Charlotte, ITD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Search utility for header info?? Greetings all: I have a fairly basic question here since I'm an interim Exchange administrator (have done some of the basic server check/account management stuff but the primary EA left in a hurry - and unlike most of my sysadmin cohorts, I've actually had Exchange training). Environment: Exchange 5.5, SP4, on NT4 SP6a machines I got asked if there was some way we could check through Information Stores for messages with a particular text in the subject. I ask around, call Microsoft, and learn about Exmerge for subject line and attachment search. I run a quick test and it performs as promised. Schweet! So of course the next question is ... Can we search the IS by sender, or recipient. Cohort thinks he finds something in EA and tests it out ... only to be advised that message logging needs to be on for this to work. We have a ~10K user GAL and our servers have space problems as it is. We _don't_ want to turn logging on. I may be dumb but I'm not entirely stupid. I checked the website of Our Beloved Sponsor and saw a few products that might fit the bill ... but of course they cost money. Possibly lots of money since we have such a big environment. I'll check with our sunbelt rep for the details and advise TPTB what that functionality might cost them but in the meantime: Does anyone know of a good and preferably inexpensive tool that does searches on an IS similar to the Outlook search function without having message logging turned on? Currently I'm looking for header search type stuff, although I'm sure that if I came up with something for that, they'd ask about body text. Apologies if this was covered recently - I've been subscribed for a week or so but have not had time to slog through the archives yet (having trouble keeping up with the current volume, actually ... even in the digest single-daily-dose. But tell me to do BLBs and the fish tacos get it ;-). We are looking for a new server/Exchange admin, so if you're within commute distance of beautiful downtown Oakland and looking for a new gig, mail me privately and I'll point you at the listing. Thanks, Charlotte Blackmer LAN Admin, Server Services Team Alameda County Information Technology Oakland, California Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 510-208-4908 Fax:510-272-3608 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Circular logging?
A mail box server will benefit for the ability to have a roll forward recovery. Where you can restore from Back then roll the current logs from the time of back up against the database. Thus loosing no data. A gateway server that has no mailboxes on it, And is only really doing routing or relaying does not need to have that ability, in that case Circular logging is recommended. For what you are doing circular logging is bad. Just go get another drive. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Kahn, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Circular logging? Do you care to elaborate on that? Stuart K. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 June 2002 15:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Circular logging? There are very few circumstances where Circular logging is a good idea. It's a particularly bad idea on a server which contains mailboxes. Kevin -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 June 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Circular logging? Do you recommend circular logging? We're trying to clear space for the transaction log files. Any ideas? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** The information in this email and any attachment or any reproduction of this email is confidential and for the use of the addressee(s) only. If received in error please advise the sender and delete all records of it from your system. Racing Champions International Limited Hembury House, Pynes Hill, Rydon Lane, Exeter, EX2 5AZ Tel: +44 (0)1392 281 900 Fax: +44 (0)1392 213 125 Registered in England No. 1634124 A List of Directors may be inspected at the Registered office as above ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Defrag
I got 77 Gigs of white space can anyone beat that? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Defrag Yes a month has flown by already. So on the topic of defragmentations, exchange does this nightly because it is awesome. Got that part. Now if I have 2GB of free space after this nightly process takes place, that is all white space that exchange uses before the priv.edb would grow larger? Is this an accurate statement or way off? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?
The DR white paper does not like it on the only DC you have. I dont seen anything wrong with it. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded? Per prior thread (see messages below) you all mentioned that there is MS docs that recommend not running Exchange on the DC. Our consultants recommended to us that we should use exchange on the DC because it was recommended by MS. Can you point me in the direction of the Docs you referenced? Current setup: total users 1800 site 1 NT 4 PDC NT 4 BDC NT 4 EXC 5.5 SP4 site 2 NT 4 BDC NT 4 EXC 5.5 SP4 site 3 NT 4 BDC NT 4 EXC 5.5 SP4 Current future plan site 1 DC with global cat. DC with EXC 2000 Site 2 DC with EXC 2000 site 3 DC with EXC 2000 Thanks for your directions. At least I now know that there could be some issues (atleast more then normal upgrade issues) Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange on DC? I have an Exchange2000 server that's been running on a DC/GC through beta3, RC1, RC2 and RTM. No problems. No unusual funkiness. The documentation strongly recommends against installing it on a DC. Though, I'm sure they hate it when customers pull crap like that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange on DC? On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, at 1:49pm, Herchenbach, Jim wrote: I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? It will install. It will even work, sort of. But, from practical experience, I can tell you that it does not work well. We did this with one of our small customers in a single-server environment. We figured, Hey, if Small Business Server does it, why can't we? Well, all sorts of funky things happened. Confusing message dialogs, lots of errors in the Event Log, etc. Spent a lot of time in the MS PSS Knowledge Base. We even called PSS on a few issues. They all resolved to, You can ignore that; Exchange will sometimes generate that error in a single-server environment. Basically, Microsoft told us Exchange is not designed to run on an Domain Controller. Not in so many words, but that is what it amounted to. I got the distinct impression that the only reason it is supported at all is that otherwise, they would not be able to sell Small Business Server, and Microsoft management will not allow that. I hate it when companies pull crap like that. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, | entity or | organization. All information is provided without | warranty of any kind. | -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange on DC? This depends on the size of your org and the amount of traffic generated. Say a 50 user org - with a nice juicy box (at least a dual p-4 with 4 gigs of ram) sure you could run e2k on a dc, and even get away with running owa on it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:50 PM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Exchange on DC? Can be. But I hear horror stories -Original Message- From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange on DC? I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
