> > This is great! but I'm likely to vote AGAINST unless we get a
> > crime/infraction distinction and this becomes an infraction, i.e. not
> > actually against the rules.
>
> Is this something that is currently being proposed, or no? I know
> there's something related to blots and stuff in the
On 6/6/2020 10:12 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> On 6/6/2020 1:05 PM, James Cook wrote:
>>> Title: Bank Robbery
>>> AI: 1.0
>>> Author: ATMunn
>>> Co-author(s):
>>>
>>> Enact a rule entitled "Heists" with the following text:
>>> {
>>> At any time, any player CAN, by announcement, perform a Heist. Upon
>>>
On 6/6/2020 10:17 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Saturday, June 6, 2020 12:08:48 PM CDT ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>> The only other thing I'm wondering about is what class crime Robbery
>> should be. I went with 3 because 2 seems too low (it is robbery after
>> all), but 4 and
On 6/6/2020 1:17 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 12:08:48 PM CDT ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
The only other thing I'm wondering about is what class crime Robbery
should be. I went with 3 because 2 seems too low (it is robbery after
all), but 4 and above is
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 12:08:48 PM CDT ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> The only other thing I'm wondering about is what class crime Robbery
> should be. I went with 3 because 2 seems too low (it is robbery after
> all), but 4 and above is considered "high crime" and seems to be
> reserved
On 6/6/2020 1:05 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
Title: Bank Robbery
AI: 1.0
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s):
Enact a rule entitled "Heists" with the following text:
{
At any time, any player CAN, by announcement, perform a Heist. Upon
doing so, e CAN transfer up to half of the coins
On 6/6/2020 12:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/6/2020 9:33 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 10:18:59 AM CDT ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
There's absolutely no way this will pass, but I'm going to try it
anyways. Aris, I don't remember
On 6/6/2020 9:33 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Saturday, June 6, 2020 10:18:59 AM CDT ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
>> There's absolutely no way this will pass, but I'm going to try it
>> anyways. Aris, I don't remember exactly when the midweek distribution
>> deadline is, but
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 11:53 AM ATMunn via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 6/6/2020 11:34 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 11:19 AM ATMunn via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> There's absolutely no way this will pass, but I'm going to
On 6/6/2020 11:34 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 11:19 AM ATMunn via agora-business
wrote:
There's absolutely no way this will pass, but I'm going to try it
anyways. Aris, I don't remember exactly when the midweek distribution
deadline
On 6/6/20 10:20 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Due to deputisation, if the Assessor didn't resolve it it would basically
> be "without objection" to not resolve it.
Well that's comforting.
--
Jason Cobb
On 6/5/2020 9:39 PM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Friday, 5 June 2020, 19:11:36 GMT+1, James Cook via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> If a proposal does get enough votes, I think this makes the Assessor
>> the one who violates the rule, when e resolves it. I guess Aris's "New
>>
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:49 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 2:40 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 5 June 2020, 19:11:36 GMT+1, James Cook via agora-discussion <
> > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 2:40 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Friday, 5 June 2020, 19:11:36 GMT+1, James Cook via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > If a proposal does get enough votes, I think this makes the Assessor
On Friday, 5 June 2020, 19:11:36 GMT+1, James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
> If a proposal does get enough votes, I think this makes the Assessor
> the one who violates the rule, when e resolves it. I guess Aris's "New
> Defenses" would protect em. Probably not a big deal.
Gratuitous: in
Oops, I forgot. I think it's now the H. Promotor's second distribution
cutoff of 00:00 Friday, so perhaps I should leave it as is. If I'm
lucky maybe I'll squeeze another coin out of it, though it was not
intentional. If I'm unlucky F/A will turn out to be 3.05 or something.
- Falsifian
On Fri,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:40 PM nch via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 4, 2020 7:25:03 PM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > What do y'all think of this proto?
> >
> > -Aris
> > ---
> > Title: Certifiable Patches
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: Aris
> >
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:40 PM nch via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 4, 2020 7:25:03 PM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > What do y'all think of this proto?
> >
> > -Aris
> > ---
> > Title: Certifiable Patches
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: Aris
> >
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:28 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 6/4/20 8:25 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Any player CAN, by announcement, certify a specified proposal (as a
> > patch),
> > causing it to become pended.
>
>
> This would enable pending
On Thursday, June 4, 2020 7:25:03 PM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> What do y'all think of this proto?
>
> -Aris
> ---
> Title: Certifiable Patches
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-author(s): nch, P.S.S.
This version looks better, but to be transparent I'll likely vote
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:25 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:43 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> agora-discussion wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:37 AM Rebecca via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:35 AM
On 6/4/20 8:25 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Any player CAN, by announcement, certify a specified proposal (as a patch),
> causing it to become pended.
This would enable pending proposals that were already voted on or are
currently being voted on. Otherwise looks good to
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:43 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:37 AM Rebecca via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:35 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> > agora-discussion wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 4,
On 6/4/20 8:18 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> I retract this proposal.
>
> -Aris
"I retract this proposal.", said Aris to the discussion forum.
--
Jason Cobb
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:20 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/4/2020 12:09 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:04 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> On 6/4/2020 11:38 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> >>>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:20 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/2020 12:09 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:04 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> On 6/4/2020 11:38 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:32 PM
On 6/4/2020 12:09 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:04 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On 6/4/2020 11:38 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:32 PM Aris Merchant wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:24 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:04 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/2020 11:38 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:32 PM Aris Merchant wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:24 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>> On 6/4/2020 9:37 AM, Publius Scribonius
On 6/4/2020 11:38 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:32 PM Aris Merchant wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:24 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On 6/4/2020 9:37 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:09 PM Rebecca wrote:
> On
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:38 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:32 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:24 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> >
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:32 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:24 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 6/4/2020 9:37 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:24 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/4/2020 9:37 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:09 PM Rebecca wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:00 AM Kerim Aydinwrote:
> >>> I think having
On 6/4/2020 9:37 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:09 PM Rebecca wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:00 AM Kerim Aydinwrote:
>>> I think having the option of a 0 being a regular thing is just fine, given
>> that the alternative is possibly taking wins away
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:36 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 6/4/20 12:24 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Do you know why we set it such that apologies expunge at least 3
> > blots? This has discouraged me from making lesser fines forgivable.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:09 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:00 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 6/4/2020 8:47 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:43 AM Rebecca
On 6/4/20 12:24 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Do you know why we set it such that apologies expunge at least 3
> blots? This has discouraged me from making lesser fines forgivable.
>
Rule 2557:
> If the
> investigator does so, the perp CAN, in a timely
On Thursday, June 4, 2020 11:09:25 AM CDT Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I think having the option of a 0 being a regular thing is just fine, given
>
> that the alternative is possibly taking wins away from people when certain
> officers get pointed at for missing a report, other
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:00 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/2020 8:47 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:43 AM Rebecca wrote:
> >>
> >> Blots are about to be significantly harder to remove, and the general
> >> Agoran expectation is
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:00 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/4/2020 8:47 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:43 AM Rebecca wrote:
> >>
> >> Blots are about to be significantly harder to remove, and the
On 6/4/2020 8:47 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:43 AM Rebecca wrote:
>>
>> Blots are about to be significantly harder to remove, and the general
>> Agoran expectation is that certain crime is pretty much constant and
>> usually no big deal (mainly slightly
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:37 AM Rebecca via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:35 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> agora-discussion wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:02 AM nch via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:41:14 AM CDT
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:35 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:02 AM nch via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:41:14 AM CDT Aris Merchant via
> agora-business
> > wrote:
> > > I submit the following proposal.
>
On Thursday, June 4, 2020 10:34:29 AM CDT you wrote:
> Could you elaborate on this? As I see it, there would be no reason for
> more CFJs to occur under this rule.
How is "primary function" determined? Is G's complete rewrite of the auction
rule primarily a bug fix?
--
nch
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:02 AM nch via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:41:14 AM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal.
> >
> > -Aris
> > ---
> > Title: Certifiable Patches
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: Aris
> >
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 18:46, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 3:40 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On 6/3/2020 2:45 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:20
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 3:40 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/3/2020 2:45 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:20 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
>
On 6/3/2020 2:45 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:20 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 6/3/2020 2:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>
>>> Aris may have a little more difficulty with eir proposal because
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:20 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/3/2020 2:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > Aris may have a little more difficulty with eir proposal because that F/A
> > ratio doesn't have a clever term-of-art name defined in R955
On 6/3/2020 2:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Aris may have a little more difficulty with eir proposal because that F/A
> ratio doesn't have a clever term-of-art name defined in R955 - and I just
> realized it's broken anyway, because the "greatest F/A ratio" doesn't
> error trap division by 0
On 6/3/2020 2:03 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:00 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On 6/3/2020 1:46 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>>> On 6/3/20 4:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
Replace the text "Rule 478" in Rule 2139, "The Registrar" with "the
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020 4:03:35 PM CDT Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:00 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>
> wrote:
> > On 6/3/2020 1:46 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > On 6/3/20 4:44 PM, Publius Scribonius
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:04 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:00 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 6/3/2020 1:46 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > On 6/3/20 4:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On 2020-06-03 15:03, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:00 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
On 6/3/2020 1:46 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/3/20 4:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:00 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 6/3/2020 1:46 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 6/3/20 4:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote:
> >> Replace the text "Rule 478" in Rule 2139, "The Registrar" with "the
> >>
On 6/3/2020 1:46 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/3/20 4:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote:
>> Replace the text "Rule 478" in Rule 2139, "The Registrar" with "the
>> rule entitled "Fora"".
>>
>> Replace the text "Rule 1789" in Rule 2139, "The
On Sunday, May 24, 2020 9:05:29 PM CDT Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 2020-05-24 18:47, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> > it used to be considered somewhat rude to submit a proposal after the
> > promotor had published eir draft but before the distribution
>
> I think we
On 2020-05-24 18:47, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
it used to be considered somewhat rude to submit a proposal after the
promotor had published eir draft but before the distribution
I think we need to respect and help officers more in general.
Thoughts on this fun proto-contract I
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:06 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 24, 2020, at 20:58, nch via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, May 24, 2020 7:50:27 PM CDT you wrote:
> >>> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 5:42 PM nch via agora-business
> >>>
> >>>
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 5:52 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 8:47 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > it used to be considered somewhat rude to submit a proposal after the
> > promotor had published eir draft but before the
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 8:47 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> it used to be considered somewhat rude to submit a proposal after the
> promotor had published eir draft but before the distribution
That's true. I'd like to apologize to the Promotor for the ways in
which I have contributed
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 3:33 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/21/2020 2:28 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 21, 2020 4:13:43 PM CDT Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> Also, you've got a bunch of zombie protections, but one thing that's not
> >> obvious is that having
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 3:16 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
> > Once a week the Treasuror CAN and SHOULD initiate an auction. The
> > auction has the following lots:
>
> This means the Treasuror will frequently have
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:51 PM nch via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 21, 2020 4:33:12 PM CDT Aris Merchant via
> agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:24 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM,
On 5/21/2020 2:42 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thursday, May 21, 2020 4:23:25 PM CDT Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
>>> The Treasuror is the auctioneer for this auction, and may order the
>>> lots
>>> as e chooses. The
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 4:23:25 PM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
> > The Treasuror is the auctioneer for this auction, and may order the
> > lots
> > as e chooses. The minimum bid for this auction is 1 coin.
>
On 5/21/2020 2:28 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thursday, May 21, 2020 4:13:43 PM CDT Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
>>> Once a week the Treasuror CAN and SHOULD initiate an auction. The
>>
>>> auction has the following lots:
>>
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:24 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
>
> > The Treasuror is the auctioneer for this auction, and may order the
> > lots
> > as e chooses. The minimum bid for this auction is 1 coin.
>
> I'm
On 5/21/2020 2:21 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/21/20 5:18 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Not the sort of danger I prefer, it just leads to messes.
>>
>> Especially because, the way I'm reading it, the lots must include a single
>> type of asset if at least
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 4:13:43 PM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
> > Once a week the Treasuror CAN and SHOULD initiate an auction. The
>
> > auction has the following lots:
> This means the Treasuror will
On 5/21/20 5:18 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Not the sort of danger I prefer, it just leads to messes.
>
> Especially because, the way I'm reading it, the lots must include a single
> type of asset if at least one exists.
>
> Right now we have changed the assets rule so that
On 5/21/2020 2:12 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:02 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
>>> * all of any single type of asset currently own by the Lost and Found
>>> Department, if any.
>>
>>
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 4:01:12 PM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
> > * all of any single type of asset currently own by the Lost and
> > Found
> >
> > Department, if any.
>
> I'm concerned about
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:02 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
> > * all of any single type of asset currently own by the Lost and Found
> > Department, if any.
>
> I'm concerned about allowing the hijacking and
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 10:19:27 AM CDT you wrote:
> Surely I can just say "CAN pay X to Y"? 2579 defines 'pay' so I think it
> triggers it sufficiently clearly (and the usage is intuitive anyway).
Clarification here: 2579 doesn't define 'pay' but it talks about payment. The
only fee-based
I'm going to resubmit and fix most of the things you mentioned, but as argued
below I don't overall agree that "by announcement" would break the clauses.
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 11:51:47 PM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:05 PM nch via agora-business
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 8:30:24 PM CDT Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> The important bit is "neither its text nor any of the aforementioned
> attributes can be changed". This means the attempt to change the
> coauthors is INEFFECTIVE under R2240.
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
Thanks for the
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:45 PM James Cook wrote:
> > > I had been under the impression that the current case of CFJ 3831 is
> > > sort of like that, since I don't remember people disagreeing with the
> > > judgement until somewhat later.
> >
> > Yes the main issue was there wasn't a peep of
> > I had been under the impression that the current case of CFJ 3831 is
> > sort of like that, since I don't remember people disagreeing with the
> > judgement until somewhat later.
>
> Yes the main issue was there wasn't a peep of complaint for the first
> 2 weeks (at least that I saw). There
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:07 PM James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Why the third requirement? What if someone notices a problem with a
> judgement 10 days after it's assigned, and there was no motion to
> reconsider?
The idea is a fixed progression: first you remand via a motion to give
> > That could probably be fixed, but it does seem to change the way at
> > least I was thinking of dependent actions. My understanding was:
> > dependent actions are methods; R2595 says how the method works;
> > R2595's implementation happens to defer to the "by announcement"
> > method.
> >
>
>
On 5/19/2020 2:56 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote:
>> I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I gave a CFJ
>> judgement essentially establishing something like this. Everyone
>> (especially G.) thought it was a
On 5/19/2020 4:01 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> (There are also fee-based actions. I don't know if we have any right
> now other than winning under R2483. Also, Agora currently CAN transfer
> zombies to their owners, which is not done by announcement.)
Also:
Initiating Agoran
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 6:01:39 PM CDT James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> I suppose that's true, but with the change you proposed, I think it's
> a little unclear how to interpret current rules that describe things
> you can do with dependent actions.
>
> For example, R2465: "A player CAN
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 22:15, nch via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 5:07:51 PM CDT Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM nch via agora-discussion
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 5:07:51 PM CDT Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM nch via agora-discussion
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote:
> > > I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM nch via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote:
> > I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I gave a CFJ
> > judgement essentially establishing something like this. Everyone
> > (especially G.) thought it
On 5/17/20 1:30 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Since this just came up, does this address the fencepost issue; i.e., what
> if the Assessor does something illegal as part of the act that changes the
> rule so it's no longer illegal? (pledges are a better example I think,
> the rule
On 5/3/20 2:47 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-03 at 11:38 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal, "with smiles and soap", AI 1:
>> --
>>
>> Create a power-1 Rule,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 11:23, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Actually, rereading it this morning, could the proposal be a bit less
> "whereas" ish and a bit more explaining why that particular judgement
> deserves it enough to override twg's failure
On 4/25/2020 11:51 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 11:11 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 01:43, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
>>> [I'm attempting to replicate, as nearly as possible, the 2 Agoran
>>> Consent requirement for awarding the patent title. Unless there is
On 4/25/2020 11:51 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Rereading the rule, it seems the Arbitor CAN make an intent for
> whoever e wants; the restriction on doing it for the judge of the CFJ
> is a should. So I guess maybe we should go that route? I'm tired and
> can't think ATM,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 11:11 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 01:43, Aris Merchant via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > [I'm attempting to replicate, as nearly as possible, the 2 Agoran
> > Consent requirement for awarding the
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:58 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> you want more than 3.0 rather than less than 3.0. this is the opposite to
> intended effect!
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 1:30 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business <
>
On 3/4/20 8:48 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> Is this needed? What's an example of a circumstance in which this would
> prevent something bad from happening?
>
> —Warrigal
A little less than a month ago, we made some large changes to voting
strength; specifically, we added
On Wed., Feb. 19, 2020, 21:41 Jason Cobb via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 2/19/20 9:38 PM, James Cook wrote:
> > I have the same question here as in another thread [0]: since awarding
> > a ribbon is a regulated action, does this rule need to explicitly
> >
On 2/19/20 9:38 PM, James Cook wrote:
> I have the same question here as in another thread [0]: since awarding
> a ribbon is a regulated action, does this rule need to explicitly
> specify a mechanism that it's using to award the ribbon (or explicitly
> override R2125)?
>
> [0]
>
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 21:32, Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> On 2/18/20 3:30 PM, AIS523--- via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 15:24 -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> >> I submit the following proposal:
> >>
> >> Title: De-secure Black Ribbons
> >>
> >>
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:40, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 2/18/20 2:27 PM, James Cook wrote:
> > You can use the word "grant" as defined by rule 2577. E.g. "A person
> > CAN grant emself a specified number of blots by announcement.".
>
>
> Sure, but I don't think that's worth
Falsifian wrote:
> Sigh. I repeal Blink test v1.1 and submit:
>
> Title: Blink test v1.2
> AI: 1
> Chamber: Legislation
> Co-authors: Jason
> Text: {
>
> Amend Rule 2601 to read in full:
>
> If this is the only paragraph in this rule, and it has been at
> least one week since this rule was last
> My apologies for the delayed reply here, but this was intentional and
> I would ask that everyone who voted against it for this reason
> consider voting in favour. This is done to match up with the way that
> proposals work: an AI=1 proposal requires a strict majority, but an
> AI=2 proposal can
301 - 400 of 1906 matches
Mail list logo
