As a matter of fact they have a very good Chief Engineer. He is actually the
DOE for a group in NY. Neal Newman I'm sure you know him.
pistonen57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's just end this nonsense.
I've never seen someone more laughably
off-base than Mike with his be-all end-all
All of you! I spoke of insinuations, meaning my response was
speculative, not accusatory, yet my quote is constantly included, with
Mike's post! Why? Please exclude me from your responses, because
this group tends to get mixed up, as to who said what. Please, when
you respond, only respond to
There was no insinuation, there were however responses that jumped to their
defense.
2fine4u [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see where anyone has said
it was the Council! You're
insinuating it, or taking a guess? Did I miss something?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You said you didn't talk to anybody about the stations problem but
Maureen said she DID talked to you about it. I guess you forgot about
that.
There was no insinuation, there were however responses that jumped to
Mike, in your inital post while in one sentence you make the point
that the local AP gov't doesn't have the juice, in the very next one
you allude to someone working through people they know in federal
gov't. Accusing the AP Council may not have been what you meant but
understand that many
That is correct they don't have the juice and it certainly doesn't have to be a
NJ Senator or Congressman. It came from someone there are thousands of these
low powered stations in the country and they aren't even on the FCC's radar.
They didnt get a fine or a citation so why was it shut
Actually I spoke to a retired FCC Inspector and he told me that this wasn't
soemthing the FCC does and that it was political.
Still haven't heard any reasons from the FCC or anyone else why it was taken
off the air.
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
Hey Fred did you see the station's antenna? Did you see the other 1000 watts
antennas on the same block?
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com,
Mike Hemeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You said you didn't talk to anybody about the stations problem but
Maureen
Mike -
Thanks for your expertise and keeping us on course about this FCC
stuff.
But be careful what you say about emergency evacuation plans, I'm
still waiting to see Asbury Park's plan. Terry Reidy, our emergency
management officer, and Harry Conover, the officer for the county,
have had a
Maureen,
That is one of the points I have been trying to make with the radio station.
It has a mandated EAS receiver and is notified of any local, state, or
national emergencies. It is the only way to reach this group of people that may
not speak English.
Mike
radio881gal [EMAIL
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I didn't say anything about the antenna, I was just calliing you a
liar.
Hey Fred did you see the station's antenna? Did you see the other
1000 watts antennas on the same block?
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found out about it from Maureen's site when I tuned in and the station was
off the air. That is when I started looking into it.
People like you are one of the reasons the city is in the shape it is in.
Further more I don't care what you think.
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's just end this nonsense. I've never seen someone more laughably
off-base than Mike with his be-all end-all doom and gloom conspiracy
theories. Whatever he thinks he knows about AP politics is all well
and good, but it has nothing to do with what happened to WYGG. There
really is no mystery to
I'm betting on Dan. I worked extensively, on FCC hearings and
outcome, based on the 1934 Communications act. I retired in 1994,
before the Act was changed in 1996. This little micro station, would
have to be poking someone in the eye, to get this attention, or
someone OWED someone, a favor!
I don't see where anyone has said it was the Council! You're
insinuating it, or taking a guess? Did I miss something?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that the AP City Council had anything to do with it
because if they had an inclination
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What reason did they give when they told you that you were
disqualified from voting?
That it wasn;t my primary residence. I think I looked it and up and
they were right. I don;t feel so bad since so many, including
So if I understand your logic correctly essentially your argument is
that because the FCC is not acting in a way that you deem typical
there must be some major conspiracy, driven by the all powerful
Asbury Park establishement, to manipulate a federal agency to do it's
bidding...
And again
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, asburycouple [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Somebody is feeding that guy a plate of BS. He ate that up without
coming up for air.
So if I understand your logic correctly essentially your argument is
that because the FCC is not acting in a way that you deem
Fred,
You should really get out of Asbury Park sometime.
Did you get a chance to see the big scary FM antenna?
I know what I know about this branch of the federal government and I don't
see any answers. It is my area of expertise what is yours? Nobody feeds me
anything. Unlike
I read about city corruption, mismanagement, murders, and other mayhem on this
list every single day and that doesnt seem to phase any of you. Yet, even with
evidence, this is beyond belief. I have not heard one single other possible
explanation of course you have no frame of reference.
I
Mike first of all welcolme to the group.
I think the problem here is on this board, folks have a high
standard of proof.
When you drop a bomb as you did, by asserting people in our City
Government are working with Congressman and Senators to keep this
radio station off the air in an unusual
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll get people to join you easily; just show them the proof.
Note: Proof isn't a guess or a surmise. Our standards are higher
than that on matters of corruption.
But in many respects there is never the kind of
Dan you seem to be on the subject of the quality of the proof, the
weight of the evidence so to speak.
I'm looking for his to just show the first scintilla of it. I scoured
his posts for proof but he honestly does give any, regardless of
quallity or weight.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com,
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan you seem to be on the subject of the quality of the proof, the
weight of the evidence so to speak.
I'm looking for his to just show the first scintilla of it. I
scoured
his posts for proof but he honestly
Mike,
With all due respect to your professional expertise which I won't
question at all, your argument that local politics has exerted itself
on the FCC doesn't hold water in either a court or in the court of
public opinion... It's not that you are wrong - you might be. Who
knows? It's
Mike,
With all due respect to your professional expertise which I won't
question at all, your argument that local politics has exerted itself
on the FCC doesn't hold water in either a court or in the court of
public opinion... It's not that you are wrong - you might be. Who
knows? It's
Dan, I'll even be willing to connect the dots where there is enough
circumstancial evidence. But other than a claim that the FCC isn't
acting normally (within their purvue but not as they typically would)
there is absolutely nothing that has been presented to link that
behavior to anything or
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, asburycouple [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dan, I'll even be willing to connect the dots where there is enough
circumstancial evidence. But other than a claim that the FCC isn't
acting normally (within their purvue but not as they typically would)
there is
Dan I do see a differnce though.
In your case, if someone did tip off the government, at least they
were calling so that the government could do the right thing.
The allegation here is that someone is calling the FCC to do the
wrong thing, and the FCC is going along with it. That's hared to
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who did you tell that
you had registered to vote here? It had to be someone who knew that.
Knowing myself, probably the entire world. If it was as Joe thought,
then even if I did not say something, I assume someone
PROTECTED]
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:04:58 PM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: what is the story on WYGG?
Dan I do see a differnce though.
In your case, if someone did tip off the government, at least they
were calling so that the government could do the right thing
site.
http://www.fybush.com/NERW/2007/070108/nerw.html
- Original Message
From: justifiedright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:04:58 PM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: what is the story on WYGG?
Dan I do see a differnce
Okay I will ask this group of experts again what law did they break? Why aren't
there any fines? Why isn't there any record of this occurring at the FCC?
Why did the FCC shut them down? They were doing the wrong thing? Great, what
was that?
justifiedright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't mention any names becuase I don't have any names but who would ever
own up to it in the first place.
Thank you for the welcome but I have been here for almost three years. I
pretty much know all of the characters on thsi site and what to expect from who.
As I just said in
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wasn't you was it? ;)
That being back in the day when you and I first met, I would have
bragged to high heaven if I had pulled one over on you like that! :-)
Seriously though, I frown on jamming people up. I try to get
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The FCC just doesnt do this on their own and for no reason. Not
occasionally, not sometimes, never! You draw your own conclusions.
Um...'cept this time? 'Cause you are asserting they are doing it now.
Mike if you say
I don't think that the AP City Council had anything to do with it because if
they had an inclination towards this they would have done something long ago.
To be honest I think they would have tried to approach this on a local level.
Someone, somewhere, with connections, in high places has
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If this is plausible to you then what the FCC did is plausible
too and I don't want to get into a discussion about the Patriot Act.
It was only a matter of time before someone blamed George Bush. ;-)
Yahoo! Groups
Well, he is the decider after all!
.
It was only a matter of time before someone blamed George Bush. ;-)
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
* To change
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Get real, I doubt vey much that it's politics show your proof.
Where did they move to? Did they do their homework? Can you have a
antenna that big in that area? Is it residential? Get the facts
first buddy.
The
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:24:51 AM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: what is the story on WYGG?
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Mike Hemeon tvnetdude2000@ ...
wrote:
Get real, I doubt vey much that it's politics show your
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Keep in mind that this station serves the Haitian and Spanish
speaking community. In an emergency it is the only means to reach
these people. If it is gone and their is an emergency, and as a
result people are injured
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon tvnetdude2000@
wrote:
That's just the way simple minded people think. They don't get the
facts.
Keep in mind that this station serves the Haitian and Spanish
Duh. The station has no problems. They simply have to get their antenna higher
in the air to cover the community. They have to file a variance with the AP
zoning board so the decision is up to AP. According to the FCC the antenna
can't stay at the height is at now. You were saying?
approval?
- Original Message
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:24:51 AM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: what is the story on WYGG?
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Mike Hemeon tvnetdude2000@ ...
wrote:
Get real, I doubt vey
Glad you asked Fred. As a matter of fact there are antennas in the
neighborhood. Take a ride along there and see for yourself.
I have dealt with network and local TV stations for past thirty five years so
don't get into the federal part of it you are unarmed. I am fluent in FCC Rules
and
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Where is the new location? Then I'll judge for myself. As will the
Zoning Board. Where is your proof of politics? Maybe the owner of the
building wants them out. Maybe the FCC got involved the FBI raided
the building
Your prior post is asserting something about calling in a favor to a
congressman or senator.
I believe you are making things up there. You have no facts about
that - you are pulling it out of thin air.
Asbury Park isn't exactly a bastion of votes for anyone. They
certainly aren't going to do
: what is the story on WYGG?
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Mike Hemeon tvnetdude2000@ ...
wrote:
Where is the new location? Then I'll judge for myself. As will the
Zoning Board. Where is your proof of politics? Maybe the owner of the
building wants them out. Maybe the FCC got involved
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is the new location? Then I'll judge for myself. As will the
Zoning Board.
Come on Fred, you usually do more investigation than that. It's at 414
Asbury Ave, right next to the Hatian church. I forgot, you do not read
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Isn't this the station that was illegally repeating the signal in
NYC? I don't know the details it just all sounds a bit strange to
me.
I couldn't get the station until I got close to AP geographically. You
don't
51 matches
Mail list logo
