Re: Alternative for bbdb-file-coding-system?

2002-09-23 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Kai Gro wrote: > David Masterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> In general, having a coding cookie in a file sounds like a good idea. >> However, does it really sound like a good idea for BBDB? I would >> think that there is the potential for the entries to be in a number

Re: bbdb + mew

2001-12-24 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, M. Warner Losh wrote: [...] > However, I am noticing that bbdb/emacs has gotten a lot slower since > 2.00 which I ran on a 500MHz PIII under Emacs 19.34. It takes 4x > longer to parse the same .bbdb file. Of course this file is 20k lines > long, so maybe that's the differe

Re: Cannot extract an address component at "foo+bar@baz.com".

2001-11-01 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Thu, 01 Nov 2001, Simon Josefsson wrote: > "Matt Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> though perhaps other characters should be allowed as well (*=!%, >> etc. etc.). In fact, perhaps all non-whitespace should be allowed >> there -- or at least every character that doesn't require

Re: vm & bbdb complete to *second* name

2001-10-25 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: > On October 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> With some reprodcuible regularity, vm & bbdb complete to the *second* >> name, rather then the primary. > > Bugs and suchlike aside, there is another issue here which collides > with doing this 'right': > > Say I

Re: bbdb-2.32 and vm.elc binary install

2001-08-31 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, david x. callaway wrote: > vm has for some while been distributed (optionally) as a single vm.elc > instead of individual lisp files. can bbdb be made to build with this > setup? That's a really *bad* idea, no matter what. The *compiled* elisp is not going to be the same acro

Re: bbdb-rfc822-addresses

2001-07-09 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: > On July 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> >> Of course, /I/ don't hold with frobbing mixed case names into a >> different set of case, being as that breaks the choices of the >> sender. I would only support frobbing when a name is ALLCAPS. :) > > I'd agree wi

Re: partial completion?

2001-07-06 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: [...] > Oh, also, you need to frob the keymap of > message-mode/vm-mode/mail-mode or whatever in order for the above to > work. And you need to frob it so that each time you hit space or TAB, > it checks if you're in a "completion zone" such as the "To:" fi

Re: bbdb-rfc822-addresses

2001-07-04 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: [...] > 2. It convert's Kai's nice ß into 'ss' for no good reason. I'm >guessing that this is buried somewhere in mail-extr. If I can't >switch this 'feature' off, I'll be quite upset. IIRC, `ß' becomes `ss' when you change it's case. Granted, my G

Re: evil hacks'r'us

2001-06-28 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: > I am contemplating some dark, devilish hacks to get around a > particularly irritating spam-vs.-bbdb problem I'm having at the > present. I may end up feeding it into bbdb's codebase as I think it > might be generally useful. Anyway, before I get to this,

Failure with Gnus marking BBDB known users when there are duplicate records.

2001-03-22 Thread Daniel Pittman
Hi. I have been using BBDB with Gnus for a while, with the multiple records in BBDB feature activated. This is /very/ nice for dealing with the two "Andrew Phillips" that I have as friends. :) Anyway, recently, I have been getting this stack trace when trying to show the mark for them: ,[ B

Re: where is the configure script?

2001-02-26 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 26 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 26 Feb 2001, Daniel Pittman yowled: >> So, I would suggest that, for this one file, you make an exception. >> It > > You get lots of CVS conflicts if you do this, in my experience. Really? I never encountered any in the, er

Re: where is the configure script?

2001-02-25 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: > On February 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I just updated from CVS and I'm not getting a top level configure >> script... Where do I get it from? > > I'm a mean and nasty militant CVS freak who thinks that generated > files shouldn't be in CVS[1], and pe

Re: `bbdb-auto-notes-alist' vs hidden headers in Gnus.

2001-02-21 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: > On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I want to use the auto-notes alist to extract X-face headers and >> other information that I don't actually want to see in the article >> buffer. > > Hmm. Is there a hook floating around there that you can use to

`bbdb-auto-notes-alist' vs hidden headers in Gnus.

2001-02-20 Thread Daniel Pittman
I want to use the auto-notes alist to extract X-face headers and other information that I don't actually want to see in the article buffer. At the moment, that text is not visible to the BBDB code as it tries to extract the information. IIRC, Gnus marks it 'invisible or 'intangible. Anyway, this

[PATCH] Fix compilation problem with `bbdb-gui'.

2001-02-18 Thread Daniel Pittman
Small typo that breaks compilation but not parsing. Daniel Index: bbdb-gui.el === RCS file: /cvsroot/bbdb/bbdb/lisp/bbdb-gui.el,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -u -p -r1.1 bbdb-gui.el --- bbdb-gui.el 2001/02/19 00:02:27 1

Re: xemacs and autoloads

2001-02-17 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: > On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I think that it should be possible to load and reload all lisp files >> to you heart's content. Therefore I suggest you remove it and see >> wether it breaks. My guess is, nothing breaks. > > The check is inser

Re: xemacs and autoloads

2001-02-16 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: > On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [...] > Oh dear. I've just realised what the problem is. bbdb-initialize does > (load "bbdb-autoloads"), IIRC. D'oh. I'm leaving the above text to > show you that I am an idiot who misses the obvious from time to >

Re: xemacs and autoloads

2001-02-16 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote: > Okay, this is officially irritating me. > > 1. Why is xemacs telling me that bbdb-autoloads is already loaded, >when I have nothing to load it in my .emacs? If you have the package installed, it's probably done by the packaging system to ensure that

Re: bbdb - future diretions

2000-11-01 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On October 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> >> /me raises hand >> >> For cooperativeness, LDAP might be our friend. But then, there's >> EUDC... > > I'd agree with that. Right tool for the job and stuff. I'd make some > noise about ou

Re: Mailing lists

2000-09-13 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Johan W. Kluwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The ideal solution, I think, would be to have aliases that referred to > entries in the BBDB database. The people I communicate with tend to > change their addresses all the time, so referring to the BBDB list, > which is us

Add an autoload cookie for 'bbdb-snarf-nice-real-name'.

2000-09-05 Thread Daniel Pittman
When trying to add a new person to my BBDB under GNUS, if that person had a name such as 'Name ', the 'bbdb-snarf-nice-real-name' would be called without actually having been loaded. The attached patch adds an autoload cookie for it which, after rebuilding them, fixed the issue for me. D

Re: changelog entries/$Log$ tag

2000-08-25 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just nuked the $Log$ tag from the top of bbdb-vm since it's > starting to get unwieldy, and on reflection I'm thinking there may be > reasons to leave it in place. My reason for removing it, and being > inclined to remove the othe

Re: Palm <-> BBDB (again)

2000-07-12 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 12 Jul 2000, Kevin Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas >> E Deweese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: "RW" == Ronan Waide >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > RW> Just to poke my oar in here; There should, in CVS, be a big chunk > RW> of code for mer

Re: Palm <-> BBDB (again)

2000-07-05 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > No, it's not perfect. I did consider rewriting the Pilot addressbook > to be more like the BBDB... For what it's worth, SuperNames (which is commercial, sadly) makes the Pilot address book *much* more usable. IMHO, of course.

Re: Snarfing from summary buffer in Gnus

2000-06-04 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Pavel Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it possible to snarf the sender of the message from summary buffer > of Gnus? If not, can this be added in the future version? I think it > can be useful for easy start with BBDB (see how scoring works). Does not ':' do what you want?