no indication that there is a libqt3-mt-devel rpm package
> anywhere. I might, of course, be totally wrong, but it seems so. Any
> more tips would be greatly appreciated, since I'm a bit confused right
> now and would like to get bbconf up and running.
> Thanks..
>
--
,-//
| Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper :: Numbers 6:22-26
`
| All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker
| in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is
| the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too.
,
| bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
`--//
asy. If you want an RPM, type "make dist-rpm".
Go get it! This one has a hidden 300 meg MPEG movie in it!!!
--
,-------------//
| Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper :: Numbers 6:22-26
`
| All brontosauruses are thin at one end, mu
ittle list" in. =:) I happen to love it. *shrug* One man's stupid
is another man's most favoritest new toy.
>
> --
> Derek Cunningham
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Human beings act intelligently only after they have
> exhausted the alternatives" -- Abba Eban
> Jamin W. Collins
>
--
,-//
| Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper :: Numbers 6:24-26
`
| All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker
| in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is
| the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too.
,
| bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
`--//
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 08:11, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
> On 04 Jun 2002 07:49:55 -0400
> "Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > er. So, I was just going to ask for a patch. =:) But it looks like
> > bbconf is working correctly?
>
that xev was seeing things correctly when I assigned
> the keys via xmodmap, but bbconf wasn't.
>
> --
> Jamin W. Collins
>
--
,-----//
| Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper :: Numbers 6:24-26
`
| All brontosau
]
- fixing Makefile.in's for NetBSD builds (probably others too)--we had
LDFLAGS overridden in all the plugin Makefiles (why, I don't know).
Thanks to Thomas Klausner for the bug report.
[vanRijn]
What are you waiting for??? GO GET IT!!!
--
,-
ntly for the compile to finish)
>
> compiles fine right out of cvs, no need to touch anything. Launches ok too.
> Everything looks good.
>
Sweet mama!! Shaleh is actually able to compile my Qt code!?!?!?! =:)
Any FreeBSD users out there?
--
,-//
| Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper :: Numbers 6:24-26
`
| All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker
| in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is
| the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too.
,
| bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
`--//
comma, period, space, etc. for keybindings)
[vanRijn]
- fixing Makefile.in's for NetBSD builds (probably others too)--we had
LDFLAGS overridden in all the plugin Makefiles (why, I don't know).
Thanks to Thomas Klausner for the bug report.
if there is anything I can do
> to help, let me know. I might have come across something
> already, that you might come across as well. And vice
> versa..hint hint. ;-)
>
> -Lup
>
> -
> ..:TheLupine:..
> http://welcome.to/thelupine
> -----
&g
X doesn't know it exists, bbkeys doesn't either.
> -Joe.
>
> --
> Joe MacDonald
> :wq
>
--
,-//
| Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper :: Numbers 6:24-26
`
| All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much MUCH
gt; dockapps inside it, and then some (except for bbpager, which you also noted).
>
> However, I _would_ like to put this in the slit as I use multiple workspaces.
> I just tried wmswallow as follows:
> wmswallow gkrellm gkrellm
> and got a truncated gkrellm inside the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Human beings act intelligently only after they have
> exhausted the alternatives" -- Abba Eban
>
> Registered Linux User Number 195825
>
--
%<--%<
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 08:29, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:11:53AM -0500, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 18:00, Alexander Volovics wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:36:02PM +0100, Yvon Thoraval
here.
Anyone able to explain this annoying little feature of RPM-building?
Anybody else seeing this?
> It was missing from the last bbconf.spec file I saw (bbconf-1.4).
>
> Alexander
>
--
%<--%<
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
tually, I am on the fence on this one. It may make it in ..
>
--
%<--%<
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
ng List.
> See Mail-Followup-To header (above) and
> http://www.google.com/search?q=Mail-Followup-To+Header
>
--
%<--%<
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
t;
> > Jamin W. Collins
>
> hm, on initial reading of the SDL code they simply raise the window to the
> top and make it cover the whole screen. Near as I can see they set no special
> hint or flag letting the wm know this.
>
> Best thing blackbox could do at that po
))) {
> + } else if ((!strcmp(argv[i], "-nobb")) || (!strcmp(argv[i], "-n"))) {
> options.nobb_config = True;
> } else if ((!strcmp(argv[i], "-v"))
> || (!strcmp(argv[i], "-version"))) {
--
%<--%<
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 13:37, Johan Ronström wrote:
> Hello
>
> I don't know who's doing the work with bbconf but I have a few suggestions for
> future features:
Um, well, I think I've littered mine and xOr's e-mail links all over
http://bbconf.sourceforge.net, but anyway
>
> It would be ni
Well, since 4 and 5 are slash^H^H^H^H^Hblackbox-mailing-list-dotted and
I can't see 'em, I think my preferences are 3 then 1.
Thread did a fantastic job on 3 and I like the subtle differences
between it and 1.
On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 11:28, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> 1) http://www.planetquake.c
And, let me just say, nice job Luke! =:) I'd had bbconf in mind for
the last year (didn't know there was a whiteBOX in the world) before I
wrote it, and if it wasn't for xOr's help, bbconf would have taken MUCH
longer than the month we took to crank out the first release. So, I
definitely under
That's what I was thinking too. Sean--wouldn't it be better if blackbox
rewrote its rc-file if and only if and immediately after blackbox
changed any of its config options?
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 08:11, Guido 'lenix' Boehm wrote:
> "Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper&
Um. This has never made sense to me. Is there any good reason that
blackbox should overwrite its rc-file every time it exits? I really,
really think this needs to be changed. At some point, I'm going to add
a bbconf plugin that lets the user make changes to his/her blackbox
rc-file. This will
I agree. The toolbar does serve a purpose--more than one actually. If
anything, it (or some other blackbox-created window) needs to be there
to catch KeyPress's if keyboard-navigable windows are going to be
included in blackbox proper.
And, I use the toolbar often for workspace-navigation, etc.
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 10:41, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > a) are there any OS/2 people out there using blackbox. I would like to remove
> > the OS/2 cruft if possible.
>
> Never having used OS/2, I don't care either way, but it's an almost
> philo
blammo, etc.
Okay, please READ this carefully
In anticipation of shaleh releasing blackbox 0.62.0 tomorrow, I'm
releasing bbkeys 0.8.4 into the wild blue yonder. You do not HAVE to
have the latest and greatest blackbox (namely 0.62.0) to use this latest
bbkeys, but 5 things won't fully work.
I cast my vote on this one also. Great work, Thread! =:)
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 19:28, scott wrote:
> ray@crytek wrote:
>
> > I've tested on w3m, IE6 (win2k) and Mozilla (win2k). This is really Thread's
> > design cut back, thats all
> >
> > Oh yer, the URL :]
> > http://www.planetquake.com/lv
=:D
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 17:07, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:59, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:
> > Look on http://movingparts.net/bbkeys_archived.shtml and search for
> > "windows". =:)
>
> As usual, you and xOr rock. Tha
Actually, with the soon-to-be-released-but-currently-available-via-CVS
0.8.4 version of bbkeys, this is a separate keybinding. So, you can
have for NextWindow and for
NextWindowAllWorkspaces. This has been removed from the bbkeys.bb
config file that xOr mentioned below in version 0.8.4.
On Tu
Look on http://movingparts.net/bbkeys_archived.shtml and search for
"windows". =:)
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:59, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 18:38, Imad wrote:
> > > The best way is to run xev and see what X calls your
> > > keys. Then, you just put the key (XLookupString giv
WOW! This I REALLY like, Thread! =:) And I'm ECSTATIC to read that
we've finally come up with a "fix for the door whack monkey glitch in
the centralcome out and fling small things into people's eyes"
YAROOH!!! =:)
LOL
Seriously, I dig this design heavily.
I may have to, um, borro
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 19:38, Imad wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help, and for bbkeys!
>
Thanks for the thanks!! =:)
> Best,
>
> --Imad "(e)magius" Hussain
> _
> "There is much to be known and above all, much to be loved... Indee
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 19:07, Imad wrote:
> Doubtless this is slightly off-topic, as this is a BlackBox mailing
> list, not a bbkeys ml, but as the two programs are rather close... well,
> let's just leave it at that.
>
> I've got a couple querries/comments on bbkeys:
>
> 1) I'm not a real QT-kin
That's because you're using "XGetInputFocus(display, &w, &revert);" every
time you do something with a window. bbkeys uses a ClientMessage from
blackbox to know what the currently focus'd window is. This was done by
design as an example of correct ICCM interaction, etc., etc.
* [01/06/02 22:24]
* [01/06/02 21:23] Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world,
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> walks into mine and says:
>
> On 07-Jan-2002 Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:
> > Hm thrice. The problem here is that blackbox is trying to
Hm thrice. The problem here is that blackbox is trying to perform a
maximize operation on a window that's not visible. I believe that the
correct fix is to add a simple check to the top of
BlackboxWindow::maximize to see whether the window we're performing this
operation on is even visible.
It'
Hm again. Good news and bad news... Good news is that this bug exists in
blackbox 61.1 proper. Bad news is that this bug exists in blackbox 61.1
proper. =:\
On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 20:22, Milan Roubal wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using bbkeys, when I pressed keys for maximilization of window, it is all ri
Hm. I can confirm this. Iconize a window, then immediately do a
keybinding that tells blackbox to maximize a window. Core dump.
Backtrace below, running 62.0pre2
(gdb) bt
#0 0x401c5911 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x401c55f4 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x401c6d71 in abort () fro
Actually, this is fixed in the CVS version of bbkeys. Thanks to Sergey
Vlasov for the original bug report and fix patch. =:)
All who care, please pull down the CVS version of bbkeys and give this a
try. (http://movingparts.net/bbkeys.shtml has the link for how to get
CVS access)
On Thu, 2
Um. Just out of curiosity, what exactly are you referring to with "will
we cater to every problem bbkeys has"? I'm the author of bbkeys and
I've always worked (with very little thanks) to make sure there are no
problems with bbkeys.
Perhaps a little clarification?
On Sat, 2001-12-15 at 00:51,
sthe wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2001 14:32:15 -0500
> "Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I believe that I've fixed this, actually. WOOT.
>
> Does this mean that this is not really an Opera issue, or something
> that Opera shoul
Actually, wmaker's code looks like this
/* prevent window withdrawal when getting UnmapNotify */
XSelectInput(dpy, wwin->client_win,
wwin->event_mask & ~StructureNotifyMask);
XUnmapWindow(dpy, wwin->client_win);
XSelectInput(dpy, wwin->client_win, wwin->event
I believe that I've fixed this, actually. WOOT. This has annoyed me to
no end. The problem as I see it is that blackbox sets the window state
for any window not currently on the current workspace to "withdrawn". I
believe this causes opera to behave differently and not know that it
already has
There's a flaw in LinkedList also xOr talked with Raven on July
28th about this one Pasting from his e-mail
I've found a problem in LinkedList.cc:
check out line 164:
__llist_node *nnode = new __llist_node, *inode =
_first->getNext();
how this function works is, if 0 is pass
* [11/25/01 23:45] Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world,
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> walks into mine and says:
> My goals for blackbox are as follows:
>
> infrastructure:
> have a current and updating website
> a bug tracker so that we do not rely on the memory o
On Thursday 15 November 2001 14:36, Scott Moynes wrote:
> * Roman Neuhauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > To answer my own question, and so that it's archived:
> > the keymap file (.bbkeysrc) is not the same as the style file
> > (bbtools/bbkeys.bb). Looks like the -c switch is meant
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 11:55, Derek Cunningham wrote:
> > Okay. Yes, you're absolutely right. And this is a blackbox issue.
> > Blackbox is broke WRT windows that have decorations removed from them.
>
> and yet there are some people on this list that feel that blackbox is fine
> as is. Sure, t
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 09:20, Derek Cunningham wrote:
> ok... to clarify: bbappconf removed all the window decorations (including
> title bar). Now, having done this, I fully expected to have to alt-click to
> move my windows, since that's what I had to do with Eterm when it was
> borderless, but
Umm. Broken internals Heh. Basically, to do this cleanly, I'd
have to do a major overhaul of bbkeys's internals. Not so much because
they're broken now as much as the paradigm for how bbkeys operates would
COMPLETELY change, not to mention a radical departure from what morel
was working on
Okay, piece of crap balsa crashed on me, so this one's going to be even
shorter. Check to see if $HOME/.bbtools/ exists. And to see if the
directory is writable for the user running bbconf. And to see if
$HOME/.bbtools/bbconf.bb is writable for the user running bbconf.
On 2001.11.10 10:32 C
You know, it's painful to even follow this discussion. Reading of one's
hard work as being described as viral... Yes, I'm sure that's what I had
in mind 2+ years ago.
Let's go back a ways bbkeys is written on top of the extremely
well-done code-base of the bbtools, written quite thankle
On 2001.11.09 12:44 Scott Moynes wrote:
>
> Blackbox used to include keyboard binding support, but it was pretty
> poor and would be more maintainable in a separate app. So, in short,
> fluxbox is the devolution of blackbox.
This I completely agree with. Not to mention the fact that bbkeys is
Umm. I'm not sure I agree with your statement, but that's beside the
point. There's no way that fluxbox will ever make its way into blackbox.
On 2001.11.08 23:07 Christian Dysthe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have Fluxbox running now. This is what BB would have been if it had
> been actively developed.
I've already looked into this with Marc's help, but I wanted it to make it
to the mailing list in case this comes back in the future, etc. I believe
that after working with Marc on this, the version of bbkeys in CVS (which
will be released as 0.8.4 whenever I get a spare day to look at it
aga
Umm. That's nice. hissy fit. Hmm. Is that a technical term?
Patches will be whole-heartedly accepted. Name-callers will be summarily
sent to the principal's office =:)
Now then. I do have this on my list of TODO's, right after spending some
quality time with my family and inventing tha
Go get it. =:) Now available at http://bbconf.sourceforge.net/ in
source, debian, RPM, SRPM, and tootie-frootie flavors. From Mr.
Happy-Happy ChangeLog
- version 1.2::
- enhancement -- menu editor--adding code to make menu-editing much
more powerful. You can now move menu items betwe
umm, and why can't we leave it as is?
On Wed, 30 May 2001 10:01:22 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >C) Eliminate the ability to run compound commands in menu
> > items, but leave it in for rootCommands.
> >D) Provide two menu items, say [exec] and [cexec]; the first
> > would jus
So. It's been a while. =:) bbkeys 0.3.6 is hereby released into the wild,
may
God have mercy on us. Thanks to several patches and ideas sent in from
my little user community (look, Ma, I've got users!!), bbkeys now sports
several new really neato features, such as window moving and resizin
59 matches
Mail list logo
