> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 23:33:57 +0100
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] blfs bootscripts (-dev)
>
.
.
>
> Yes, I agree about addressing it: but the two streams in b/lfs should
(( s/agree
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:08:10 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] blfs bootscripts (-dev)
>
> akhiezer wrote:
>
> > Btw, what was it decided you to 'get more involved' on the sysd side -
> > e.g. demand fo
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:12:31 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] blfs bootscripts (-dev)
>
> I've been looking at the blfs bootscripts in preparation of adding
> support of systemd type of services.
>
> I don NOT intend to remove the current scripts,
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:29:00 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
>
> Today I've been working on the package currency scripts at
> http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html
>
Is there an all-on-one-page version of
> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:33:25 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Git server instructions
>
.
.
>
> Link to bootscripts at foot of page ('in the blfs-bootscripts-20140301
> pack
> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:15:07 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Git server instructions
>
.
.
> walkthrough setup of a simple config; and refer the user to the gitolite
> tarball infos &
> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:40:07 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Git server instructions
>
> Hello, I've taken some time to write some basic instructions on how to
> get a basic git server up and running.
>
> The instructions can be found at:
>
> http:/
> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:40:07 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Git server instructions
>
> Hello, I've taken some time to write some basic instructions on how to
> get a basic git server up and running.
>
> The instructions can be found at:
>
> http:/
> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:59:51 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Git server instructions
>
> > Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:40:07 +0100
> > From: "Armin K."
> > To: BLFS Developme
> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:40:07 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Git server instructions
>
> Hello, I've taken some time to write some basic instructions on how to
> get a basic git server up and running.
>
> The instructions can be found at:
>
> http:/
> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:40:07 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Git server instructions
>
> Hello, I've taken some time to write some basic instructions on how to
> get a basic git server up and running.
>
> The instructions can be found at:
>
> http:/
> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:22:52 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Libexec WebKitGTK [Was ... r12813 ...]
>
> Em 04-03-2014 02:17, Armin K. escreveu:
> >
.
.
> >> I am thinking of adding, after "make install":
> >>
> >> webk
> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 21:56:30 +
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Policy on locale for building ? (ticket #4745)
>
.
.
>
> >
> > Root (at least) here is always still non-utf8 .
> >
>
> The book (at least in most cases) builds as a
> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 20:18:34 +
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Policy on locale for building ? (ticket #4745)
>
.
.
>
> If I configure gegl in my normal UTF-8 locale, there is no problem
> even with ruby already installed. But
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:29:32 +0100
> From: Igor ??ivkovi??
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
>
> On 2014-02-26 17:20, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
> >
> > Yes, as I suspected: you're bs'ing.
>
> That's funny because mostly everything I have ever se
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:58:22 +0100
> From: Igor ??ivkovi??
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
>
.
.
>
> I bothered enough with it to remove it from the book. If someone else
But you didn't bother to go back to list - or indeed t
> >> I'd dump texlive, but libreoffice is useful to me.
> >
> > Just to check: if something is deemed by you to be presently not useful
> > to you, then do you 'dump' it from just your own builds, or would you
> > want
> > to remov
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:08:38 +0200
> From: "Gregory H. Nietsky"
> To: blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
>
>
> On 26/02/2014 17:00, Igor ??ivkovi?? wrote:
> > On 2014-02-26 15:53, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
> >> And as asked clearly: the reference
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:00:19 +0100
> From: Igor ??ivkovi??
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
>
> On 2014-02-26 15:53, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
> >
> > And as asked clearly: the references are ... , what, where?
>
> Go to your favorite search en
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:38:59 +0100
> From: Igor ??ivkovi??
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
>
> On 2014-02-26 15:24, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:47:05 +0100
> >> From: Igor ??ivkovi??
> >> To: BLFS Development List
ommit messages. It
is important that all development discussion of interest to the Book's
users take place on blfs-dev, not here."
(NB am just asking a question here.)
rgds,
akhiezer
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxf
some of the
recent stuff looks like folks _STAMPING_OUT_ things that they happen to
not like, or have some 'bee in the head' about, or is beyond their ken,
or they _just_can't_be_bothered_about_(TM), &usw.
rgds,
akhiezer
>
> I mean compared to postfix and exi
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:55:52 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Problem
>
> Em 24-02-2014 19:36, akhiezer escreveu:
> >> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:06:57 -0300
> >> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> >
tp://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/4725'),
together with the above sendmail stuff, sounds more like someone is in a
rather irascible mood?
rgds,
akhiezer
> Pierre
> --
>
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:06:57 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Problem
>
> I am feeling a little depressed, now.
>
> Will be unable to work for some days, perhaps weeks.
>
Fernando, what's up? (Don't mean to pry).
I'm seeing (just to note
> Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:20:08 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions
>
.
.
>
> There are different ways than with playing with xsl (shell subsitutions
> and such, generating .xml files from .xml.in files using temp
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 20:04:15 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions
>
.
.
>
> I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific
> notes for now.
Yes, but could they be shipped as, say, di
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:27:53 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions
>
> On 02/19/2014 11:00 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> > Hello, I've taken some time to write "modifications" that are necessarry
> > for the current BLFS book to get som
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:29:50 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] My BLFS checks
>
.
.
>
> The attached patch contains changes I made. I only ask the patch to be
> applied without any changes and then the changes can be made later if
> ne
> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:58:05 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Development List ,
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] lsb_release configuration [Was: ... Iced Tea 2.4.1
> and iced tea 2.4.5 sed unknown option to `s']
>
> Em 17-02-2014 11:21, akhiezer escreveu:
&
> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:10:17 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] lsb_release configuration [Was: ... Iced Tea 2.4.1 and
> iced tea 2.4.5 sed unknown option to `s']
>
> Em 17-02-2014 07:53, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> > Em 17-02-2014 03:4
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:49:07 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Installation of MIT Kerberos V5 and gpg
>
> On 02/16/2014 01:36 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> > gpg --verify krb5-1.12.1.tar.gz.asc krb5-1.12.1.tar.gz
> >
> > gpg --keyserver pgp.
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:44:23 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] News about nouveau and systemd
>
.
.
> [...] not spotting it earlier, I just woke up when I wrote this
> response. The rest still stands.
>
- the first two are taken
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:27:50 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] News about nouveau and systemd
>
>
> On 10.2.2014 13:04, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> > I thought it would be worth sharing what I have just read. Perhaps not
> > everybody knows abou
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:12:07 +0200
> From: "Gregory H. Nietsky"
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Greetings How bout a "VOIP" section ??
>
>
> Ekiga is under "other X" id like to suggest a section VOIP/Comms that
> will add
>
> Linphone
> H.323
> gnugk
> T38Modem
> Hylafax
>
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:04:24 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] News about nouveau and systemd
>
> I thought it would be worth sharing what I have just read. Perhaps not
> everybody knows about it yet.
>
> 1. Debian votes for systemd
>
> http
> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:55:40 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] ppp/pppoe [was: create-service-dir in
> blfs-boo(t)scripts]
>
.
.
>
> I guess the point is that pppoe is not common functionality any more for
> BLFS users. I
> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 14:33:11 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: akhiezer ,
> BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] ppp/pppoe [was: create-service-dir in
> blfs-boo(t)scripts]
>
> akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:40:27 -060
t;
> http://cmcnet.en.made-in-china.com/product/GoUJMYWFfyVd/China-Thomson-Speedtouch-ST585-V6-54mpbs-4-Port-Wireless-ADSL2-Modem.html
>
> Most people who have a computer should be able to afford $18 US.
>
I think that that _totally_ misses the point. Much DSL pro
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:03:57 +0100
> From: Pierre Labastie
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] create-service-dir in blfs-booscripts
>
> Le 29/01/2014 19:18, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2014,
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:32:15 +0100
> From: Pierre Labastie
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] create-service-dir in blfs-booscripts
>
> Hi all,
>
> In blfs-bootscripts, the Makefile has:
>
> create-service-dir:
> install -d -m ${DIRMODE}
> ${EXTDIR}/sysconfig/network
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:33:21 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] : Add package: lsof_4.87
>
.
.
>
> In a terminal where I first used when it was installed at /usr/sbin/,
> when tried using again, after installing now in /us
the item being
> discussed :)
>
D'you have lsof - the item being discussed here ? ;)
(You said you don't build it; or have you for the purposes of this thread
done a test-build (doesn't sound like it) or using an installed distro
(doesn't sound like it) ? ) ;)
(Jus&#x
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:22:22 +0100
> From: Pierre Labastie
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] findmnt
>
.
.
> Actually, in a recent post of Karel Zak, one of the util-linux maitainers
((
'maitai'-ners ? That explains a lot ... ;P
( https://www.google.c
t;>
> >
> >
> > Eeek. I'll keep it non-setuid, tyvm.
>
> LOL. Your distro...
>
Indeed, 'LOL' while recommending folks install as set*id; even moreso as it's
not really needed. (Lsof 'needed' [even though it didn't really] set*id e
> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:05:27 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] [BLFS Trac] #4556: Add package: lsof_4.87
>
> akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:20:36 +0100
> >> From: "
> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:20:36 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] [BLFS Trac] #4556: Add package: lsof_4.87
>
> On 12.1.2014 21:12, BLFS Trac wrote:
> > #4556: Add package: lsof_4.87
> > +---
> >
al' archive:
http://mirror.linux.org.au/linux.conf.au/
http://mirror.linux.org.au/linux.conf.au/2013/ogv/
))
rgds,
akhiezer
> -- Bruce
> --
>
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:21:19 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Proposal of patch to correct bad URL
>
> > Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:15:41 +0100
> > From: Denis Mugnier
> > To: blfs Dev ml
&g
> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:15:41 +0100
> From: Denis Mugnier
> To: blfs Dev ml
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Proposal of patch to correct bad URL
>
> Hi,
>
> For the french translation of BLFS, I check the URLs in the book.
> I found some bad URL, so I propose a patch to correct it.
>
.
prefer for such entries.
--
I get called all sorts of things - and it doesn't bother me ... ;P .
Are you going to be editing any of the Books again -
blfs/lfs/lfs-systemd/blfs-systemd/cross( ;) )-lfs, etc?
rgds,
akhiezer
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> From: Matt Burgess
> To: BLFS Development List
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:13:04 +
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Proposed changes
>
> On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 16:18 +, akhiezer wrote:
>
> > I mean parsing of the blfs xml tree to build a deps-tree: but that of
>
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:18:22 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Proposed changes
>
.
.
> > > (More generally, what the 'Proposed changes' and 'Discussion about
> > &
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:39:06 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Proposed changes
>
> akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:12:16 -0500
> >> From: Bruce Dubbs
> >> To: BLFS Development List
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:52:34 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c.
>
.
.
>
> 'general/prog/other-tools.xml' contains entries (that get rendered visibly -
&g
> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:05:13 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] ldns/libevent/doxygen -- Re: typos, patches, &c.
>
.
.
> > 'networking/netlibs/ldns.xml' has the line:
> > &qu
> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:08:21 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] libnice typo -- Re: typos, patches, &c.
>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600
> > From: Bruce Dubbs
> > To: BLFS Develop
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 23:36:30 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] k3b/libmusicbrainz -- Re: typos, patches, &c.
>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600
> > From: Bruce Dubbs
> > To: BLFS Dev
chiving
more GNOME packages' threads from Oct/Nov, flag up again is that handling of
deps-trees is still not very rigourous or automated in blfs.)
akhiezer
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c.
>
.
.
> The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated.
> Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c.
>
.
.
> The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated.
> Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.
- subject line should've been '...ldns/libevent/doxygen...' and not
'...ldns/libnice/doxygen...' - i.e. nice -> event .
akh
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c.
>
.
.
> The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated.
> Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c.
>
.
.
> The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated.
> Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c.
>
.
.
> The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated.
> Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.
Hi,
While reading through blfs74 book, I noticed in passing several apparent typos,
inconsistent-casing, packages referred to as external yet are now part of book,
and so on.
First: are you interested in applying these corrections to the book; of course,
you'll want to see them first - but at
> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 18:26:45 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Cannot print - again
>
> Sorry, hit the key, before editing.
>
> I will keep trying to solve, and eventually, will send mor log and
> detail to -support.
>
> Previous message
> From blfs-dev-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Tue Aug 20 14:45:37 2013
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:30:43 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Today's new packages
>
> Developers were very busy yesterday.
>
> As of Aug 20:
>
> gnupg2 2.0.20 -> 2.0.21
> co
> Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:27:01 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Site down
>
> The site for libatasmart and libdaemon (0pointer.de) has been down for
> several days. Can anyone suggest an alternate site?
>
Looks like they're back up.
Did have a look for alternates back when
> Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:22:11 +0100
> From: Ken Moffat
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] mozilla packages
>
.
.
>
> NB I test from firefox instead of using wget, because I've already
> got a local copy of ff-23, I don't want to repeatedly download
> 111MB (or actually download seamonke
> From blfs-dev-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Aug 7 19:19:31 2013
> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 12:03:00 -0500
> From: Rob Landley
> To: akhiezer ,
> BLFS Development List
>
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Planning ahead
>
> On 08/04/2013 05:05:56 AM, akhiezer
> From blfs-dev-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Sun Aug 4 16:38:38 2013
> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 10:24:36 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: akhiezer ,
> BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Planning ahead
>
> akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Sat, 03
> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 18:07:43 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist ,
> BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Planning ahead
>
> We have reached a milestone. The SVN versions of both LFS and BLFS are
> now up to date. There are no major outstanding issues
> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 09:35:20 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Vim 7.3.1314
>
> Igor ??ivkovi?? wrote:
>
> > I would also recommend Screen. Once you learn it, you'll never need more
> > than one terminal window.
>
> Unless you want to look at multiple things at one time. It
> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:39:55 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Vim 7.3.1314
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Fernando de Oliveira
> wrote:
.
.
> >
> > For my personal use, I learned to use vim because it was the default
> > editor in LFS, and noticed th
> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:06:25 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Package Currency
>
.
.
>
> It's interesting that I recently did a BLFS build for myself without
> considering if the packages were the latest or not -- just what was in
> the book. It help
> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 17:58:52 +0100
> From: "David B."
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Package Currency
>
>
> > You seem to have the wrong end of the stick: the automation is not being
> > queried - that's pretty obviously required. What is being queried, is why
> > are
> > you trying to auto-
> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 11:07:03 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Package Currency
>
.
.
>
> > * and use them to create a non-formal, non- numbered-version,
> >non-official-, eternally dev-branch, non-tarball, rolling-, 'release'
> >downstream
> Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 12:40:42 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Subject: [blfs-dev] BLFS Package Currency
>
> One of the more difficult things that I've found about BLFS is to
> determine whether a package in the book is current or not. I've
> decided to work on a set of scripts to help with tha
o on.
Part of the reason for asking is for doing and maintaining some reliable
automated analyses of chains of deps in blfs: it would be good to know how much
one can rely on strict categorisation in the source xml.
Thanks,
akhiezer
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Just for-info, in case not already seen:
[ ref: http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20130304#donation ]
"Donations: Linux From Scratch receives US$350.00"
"February 2013 DistroWatch.com donation: Linux From Scratch
We are happy to announce that the recipient of the February 2013
Distr
> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:14:32 +1000
> From: Wayne Blaszczyk
> Subject: Re: "BLFS-6.7.x"
>
.
.
> >
> > Also, where are your current-work 6.8 patches &c being merged/committed
> > into?
> >
> it's on my own private git repository. I've only started to use git over
> the last t
> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:23:23 +1000
> From: Wayne Blaszczyk
>
> On 22/08/11 07:04, akhiezer wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I'm considering building a system based on BLFS-svn-20110728 and LFS-6.7 .
> >
> >
> >
Hi,
I'm considering building a system based on BLFS-svn-20110728 and LFS-6.7 .
Are Wayne/Guy/Randy/etal interested in receiving any
patches/confirmations/feedback/&c from that process, towards a release
of BLFS-6.7.x by end March 2012 at latest?
If yes, then is it ok to mail the info main
Hi,
I'd suggest that the best way forward from here, is to pick a released
LFS version, base a BLFS version off of it, and release the completed
BLFS version within 18 months of the LFS release.
For example, LFS-6.7 was released on 18/Sept/2010: can BLFS-6.7 be
released by 18/Mar/2012 ?
I
85 matches
Mail list logo
