Now even Larry is calling Larry an ass.
:)
.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
>>when the politician has followers who...
>>
>>Are you for real?
>>
>>.
>>
>>On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>>>
>
> Yes. Are you an ass?
>
> Rather I should ask. is it hard w
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:08 PM, PT wrote:
>
>> Weird because that's what he said about Palin and Bachmann. Maybe I
>> took liberties when I said ALL.
>
> This is part of what I was talking about. You often take liberties and
> then respond by asking the person to defend their comments against th
Wow. Just wow.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Could you do a bullet list of exactly what damage Obama has done?"
>
> That's enough for now.
>
> Imagine 4 more years with no worry about re-election. Bye-bye guns,
> privacy, and money
~
"Could you do a bullet list of exactly what damage Obama has done?"
Not an extensive one. I don't have all night. And before I start a list,
can anyone provide me with a bullet list of his accomplishments? I'll give
him Osama and lowering his handicap.
* Added 1 trillion dollars to the nation
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I never understood why a woman would willingly want to be part of a
> group whose 'rule book' basically states they are not equal to men,
> and that they, as women, could never hold a position of authority in
> the group. And this goes for mo
Well, you got one right.
But if you're making a list for future reference, Maureen is a
Jeffersonian radical, so far to the left of the left they can't even
see her wave.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Eric's a Nazi, Scott's a Nazi, Sam's a Nazi, PT's a Nazi, Jerry's a Nazi, G
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> Damn skippy I would. No where near my top choice, but I wouldn't hesitate.
> Considering the damage Obama has done with an election in the future, think
> of what he could do without worrying about re-election.
Could you do a bullet list of
"At the risk of making an assumption, it seems like you were trying to see
if 'obey' was one of them."
That was going to be my next question.
And again, I don't want to get into a Biblical discussion. I do believe
that the Bible indicates that men should be the head of the household. At
the sa
Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 2:25 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
>> Just as an
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 2:25 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
>> Just as an aside, did you get
It depends on the church. I seem to remember being there in my cousin's
wedding 5 years ago.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 2:25 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar t
This is agreeing with you twice in a row *running around...the sky is
falling...the sky is falling...*
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 10:23 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar
scott its not psychotherapy. Minnesota allows non liscensed practitioners.
Marcus
bachmann has no training from any recognized grad school. He has not passed any
professional certifications like the apa liscensure. Moreover the therapy he
practices does not work.
even the best study that looke
I thought we were socialists or commies...
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:22 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
Eric's a Nazi, Scott's a Nazi, Sam's a Na
>when the politician has followers who...
>
>Are you for real?
>
>.
>
>On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>>
Yes. Are you an ass?
Rather I should ask. is it hard work or merely talent that made you such an
ass.
~
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> Just as an aside, did you get married in a church? Exchange vows? What
> were the vows?
We were married in a Catholic ceremony. Can't be sure of the exact
phrasing, but I believe 'love, honor and cherish, for the rest of my
days' were a pa
Here are some other Bible passages that discuss women - seems
'submissive' might be the most flattering word to use..
But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and
the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 1
Corinthians 11:3
Wives, submit yourselves
"I quoted definitions of 'submissive' from the dictionary...not sure how one
could skew that."
Oh, I am sure that you used the definition directly from the book. Just
wonder if you do the same for all other candidates, issues, and so on.
Anyway, looking at the synonyms for submissive, you find:
There is not one definition of the word 'submissive' I saw that I feel
would make a reasonable person feel good about being labeled
'submissive'
I quoted definitions of 'submissive' from the dictionary...not sure
how one could skew that.
It was Sam who was trying to show that the word apparently
"If we do not use a dictionary for definitions of words we use, what user
are dictionaries or the words, for that matter?"
People have a tendency to skew definitions when they benefit from it and use
definitions faithfully when they benefit from it.
You don't?
And I'm not getting into the Bibl
If we do not use a dictionary for definitions of words we use, what
user are dictionaries or the words, for that matter?
The Bible is chock full of passages that, to me, are sexist (I find it
odd how it says the woman must be submissive to the man, but not the
reverse). Modern Christians sem to b
"You can try to twist the meaning of the word any way you want. I will stick
with the dictionary definitions, and not definitions from someone trying to
make their 'Holy Book' seem less sexist."
Just wonder if you stick with the dictionary definition for other things
when it is inconvenient or c
Eric's a Nazi, Scott's a Nazi, Sam's a Nazi, PT's a Nazi, Jerry's a Nazi, G
Money is a mega Nazi, Larry is a no good back bacon chompin' Nazi, Maureen's
a Nazi, Justin's a Nazi, Ras' a golf club swingin' Nazi, RoMunn's a Nazi,
Judah's a leather wearing Nazi and Medic: super Nazi.
*dusts off hands
So Bachmann is the only republican woman?
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:47 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:36 PM, PT wrote:
>
> I am
On 7/8/2011 9:47 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:36 PM, PT wrote:
>>
>> I am pretty reasonable, or I like to think so .. hope so. I wasn't
>> speaking about this particular conversation, more commenting on a
>> pattern I have noticed over the years.
>
> So you seem to miss a lot. I'
YEC or Young Earth Creationists
Personally I prefer the last word to be missing a few letters to get - Cretins.
>On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> No, this is about origins but we know how you feel about religion so hate
>> away.
>>
>
>I was talking about evolutionand i wa
Nice try but you know that's not true.
.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:10 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> Fraid so.
>
> It should be noted that the common denominator in every thread that ends
> like this.is you.
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> Nice. So we've reached this part of
Fraid so.
It should be noted that the common denominator in every thread that ends
like this.is you.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Nice. So we've reached this part of the thread?
>
> .
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, G Money wrote:
> >
> > I type words, you read the
Nice. So we've reached this part of the thread?
.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> I type words, you read them, and come out with a completely different
> understanding of them than the rest of the english speaking world.
>
> *shrug*
>
> Have a great weekend.
>
~
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:36 PM, PT wrote:
>
> I am pretty reasonable, or I like to think so .. hope so. I wasn't
> speaking about this particular conversation, more commenting on a
> pattern I have noticed over the years.
So you seem to miss a lot. I'm very consistent about frivolousness
attra
I type words, you read them, and come out with a completely different
understanding of them than the rest of the english speaking world.
*shrug*
Have a great weekend.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Wow dude, I thought you were one of the reasonable ones.
>
> So he's hating on
"Jerry, i know you have a conservative bent.."
More libertarian, but yes.
"..but you are highly intelligent."
Debatable.
"Are you serious when you say this, or just venting/looking for a reaction?"
Damn skippy I would. No where near my top choice, but I wouldn't hesitate.
Considering the da
On 7/7/2011 7:47 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Wow dude, I thought you were one of the reasonable ones.
I am pretty reasonable, or I like to think so .. hope so. I wasn't
speaking about this particular conversation, more commenting on a
pattern I have noticed over the years.
Thanks for the summary, thou
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> I am not offended by religious people. My wife is a religious person.
> Some of my closest friends (including a priest) are religious people.
> Some of these people (the ones I have had conversations about Bachmann
> with) think she is a relig
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You know you lost points when Eric sides with you :P
>
And I blame you for that :P
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can
wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris
http://xkcd.com
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> Sam, don't be such a simpleton. I was not hating on 'all female
>> Republicans'. I was hating on Bachmann. No one else...Bachmann.
>
> I wasn't referring to you.
Oops...my bad.
>
>> Fundy or
now I have slammed others for saying similar things
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Sam, don't be such a simpleton. I was not hating on 'all female
> Republicans'. I was hating on Bachmann. No one else...Bachmann.
I wasn't referring to you.
]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:11 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
The irony of claiming an intelligent person would vote for Obama after more
than two years of proof he's not a good choice.
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, G
have slammed others for saying similar things
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> But you stated she was a fundie and then stated you were sure she
> believed the earth was 6000 years old. Now you're complaining because
> you have to back it up?
>
>
Nope, jus
nity
> Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
>
>
> I was led to believe that by the other religious shit she spews on a daily
> basis.
>
> It is kind of hard to take you serious when y
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Sam, don't be such a simpleton. I was not hating on 'all female
> Republicans'. I was hating on Bachmann. No one else...Bachmann.
I wasn't referring to you.
> Fundy or not, she it a bit too far to the religious right for my
> liking. Hell,
Welcome to the club Scott...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:50 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
I was led to believe that by the other religious shit she spews
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Wow dude, I thought you were one of the reasonable ones.
>
> So he's hating on all female Republicans because they're
> fundamentalists which in his view means they actually have faith. If
> they went to church but thought most of what was said was B
Wow dude, I thought you were one of the reasonable ones.
So he's hating on all female Republicans because they're
fundamentalists which in his view means they actually have faith. If
they went to church but thought most of what was said was BS he might
vote for them. Now it's clear from the start
On 7/7/2011 2:49 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> It is kind of hard to take you serious when you are vehemently
> defending this nut job.
It's hard to take him seriously when most of what he does is reduce a
page of discussion to a few snips, stretch them just ever so slightly
off-topic and then tos
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> That's funny, and here I am trying to figure out how an intelligent
> person would not learn from his mistake.
>
I could think Obama has been a terrible president, and still think him a
better option than Bachmann.
~~~
That's funny, and here I am trying to figure out how an intelligent
person would not learn from his mistake.
Meanwhile Krauthammer speculated that middle aged unemployed will
never work again.
But that's acceptable as long as the person making policy decisions
isn't a believer.
.
On Thu, Jul 7
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I thought that's what you were claiming, that as an intelligent person
> he would certainly choose Obama.
>
Over Bachmann, yes.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:14 PM, G Money wrote:
>
>
> I thought intelligent people could and did vote for George W. Bush. Same for
> Barack Obama, Al Gore, John Kerry and John McCain. Obviously i liked some of
> those people more than others, but I would not stoop to call anyone who
> voted for th
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> The irony of claiming an intelligent person would vote for Obama after
> more than two years of proof he's not a good choice.
>
I thought intelligent people could and did vote for George W. Bush. Same for
Barack Obama, Al Gore, John Kerry and John
The irony of claiming an intelligent person would vote for Obama after
more than two years of proof he's not a good choice.
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
>>
>> If it's Bachman verus Obama, I'll vote for Bachmann.
>>
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> If it's Bachman verus Obama, I'll vote for Bachmann.
>
You would seriously vote for Bachman over Obama?
I can't even wrap my mind around that.
Jerry, i know you have a conservative bentbut you are highly
intelligent. Are you serious
If it's Bachman verus Obama, I'll vote for Bachmann.
That's note exactly a big endorsement. I'd also vote for Pawlenty, Cain,
Paul, Santorum, Hillary Clinton, Sam, Maureen, Scott, Vivec, or Robert.
Maybe even Jimmy McMillen.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:37 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> Oooh...nice try. Partisans are stuck with their usual barbsthis is a
> classic one. Never mind that, as an independent, I have supported many
> Republicans.
I keep forgetting your the one that's open minded and I'm not :P
> We're actually b
OK I just wasted ten minutes going threw your link. Nothing, just an
idiot blogger make shit up. No sources no backing. Pure BS.
I do seem to remember you defending Ayers. Please explain.
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> she actively fund raised for the group. She is
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You can but be aware it's called pre-judging AKA prejudice.
>
Wait a minuteall opinions can't be considered prejudice!
ARe you telling me you have NEVER in all your life formed an opinion on a
person you have never met based only on what you h
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> She never expected your support. I never expected you to support a
> Republican.
>
Oooh...nice try. Partisans are stuck with their usual barbsthis is a
classic one. Never mind that, as an independent, I have supported many
Republicans.
> We'r
she actively fund raised for the group. She is very much aware of their agenda,
which included a violent anti-gay agenda. She has not disassociated herself
from the group.
You're willing to give her a buy over this. Fine the next time you start
bringing up various antique political groups and
You can but be aware it's called pre-judging AKA prejudice.
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:22 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> But you stated she was a fundie and then stated you were sure she
>> believed the earth was 6000 years old. Now you're complainin
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:19 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> yes, a stance that is utter bullshit, and exactly what I disapprove of.
Good for you. Now you actually have a personal reason for your attacks.
> This is not hearsay or an attack...this is me not supporting her for exactly
> the right reasons.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> But you stated she was a fundie and then stated you were sure she
> believed the earth was 6000 years old. Now you're complaining because
> you have to back it up?
>
>
Nope, just saying it's difficult to prove or disprove my hypothesis...that's
all.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> She didn't say to stop teaching evolution, she said why not add origins to
> it.
>
yes, a stance that is utter bullshit, and exactly what I disapprove of.
This is not hearsay or an attack...this is me not supporting her for exactly
the right reaso
But you stated she was a fundie and then stated you were sure she
believed the earth was 6000 years old. Now you're complaining because
you have to back it up?
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:02 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> It's not that I'm defending he
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, G Money wrote:
>
>
> I was talking about evolutionand i was right.
>
> not sure what you are talking about re: origins.
She didn't say to stop teaching evolution, she said why not add origins to it.
> I have yet to find anything about whether she is a New Ea
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> It's not that I'm defending her, it's that I'm asking you folks to
> back up you attacks.
>
Which i am doing with her own quotes.
Unfortunately the "age of the earth" isn't a very common topic with
presidential hopefuls.so not finding that one
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> No, this is about origins but we know how you feel about religion so hate
> away.
>
I was talking about evolutionand i was right.
not sure what you are talking about re: origins.
I have yet to find anything about whether she is a New Earther,
It's not that I'm defending her, it's that I'm asking you folks to
back up you attacks.
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I was led to believe that by the other religious shit she spews on a
> daily basis.
>
> It is kind of hard to take you serious when you are vehementl
No, this is about origins but we know how you feel about religion so hate away.
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:44 PM, G Money wrote:
>
>
> Surprise surprisefrom Wiki:
>
> Bachmann supports the teaching of intelligent design in public school
> science classes. During a 2003 interview on the KKMS
I was led to believe that by the other religious shit she spews on a
daily basis.
It is kind of hard to take you serious when you are vehemently
defending this nut job.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Because you were led to believe that.
>
> Job well done lefties.
>
> .
>
> On T
"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>>
>> I cannot say for sure, but it certainly would not surprise me if she did.
>>
>
> I bet she does.
>
> I'm sure she's an
Because you were led to believe that.
Job well done lefties.
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I cannot say for sure, but it certainly would not surprise me if she did.
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> So Bachmann thinks the earth is 6000 years old?
when the politician has followers who...
Are you for real?
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> when the politician has followers who advocate killing people because they
> are gay, then yes. She has been associated with this group (YCRBYCH) since
> before 2006, and is we
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>>
>> I cannot say for sure, but it certainly would not surprise me if she did.
>>
>
> I bet she does.
>
> I'm sure she's an evolution denier as well.
She absolutely is. I have seen a few art
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:42 PM, G Money wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>>
>> I cannot say for sure, but it certainly would not surprise me if she did.
>>
>
> I bet she does.
>
> I'm sure she's an evolution denier as well.
>
Surprise surprisefrom Wiki:
Bachma
You really don't get the religion thing do you?
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Obama hasn't claimed that he hears the voices of invisible friends...Bush on
> the otherhand...
>
~|
Order the Adobe Co
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I cannot say for sure, but it certainly would not surprise me if she did.
>
I bet she does.
I'm sure she's an evolution denier as well.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Ant
>We need to get back to government of the people, by the people, and
>for the people. Our politicians seem totally incapable of or unwilling
>to stop the slow-motion tide of financial destruction approaching the
>United States. Slotting in Bachmann or Palin or Obama doesn't change
>the basic math.
I cannot say for sure, but it certainly would not surprise me if she did.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> So Bachmann thinks the earth is 6000 years old?
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Sam wrote:
>>>
>>> Point
So Bachmann thinks the earth is 6000 years old?
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Point is she is no more a fundamentalist than Obama is.
>> Obama has on several occasions quoted the scriptures publicly.
>
> There is a d
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, G Money wrote:
>
>> Point is she is no more a fundamentalist than Obama is.
>
> Do you really believe that? Really, truly, and honestly...that when it comes
> to religious fundamentalism, Barack Obama and Michell Bachmann are the
> same?\
Religious fundamentalism
>Point is she is no more a fundamentalist than Obama is.
>Obama has on several occasions quoted the scriptures publicly.
>
>It's more like the Alinsky tactic:
>"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
>
Have you ever read Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. Until you do you ought
when the politician has followers who advocate killing people because they are
gay, then yes. She has been associated with this group (YCRBYCH) since before
2006, and is well aware of their agenda. Hwever she has not renounced her
associated with the group nor their violent agenda. Or in this c
"We need to get back to government of the people, by the people, and for the
people. Our politicians seem totally incapable of or unwilling to stop the
slow-motion tide of financial destruction approaching the United States.
Slotting in Bachmann or Palin or Obama doesn't change the basic math. Thi
"To me it sounds like he said he refuses to support a Republican."
Kind of like the NEA. They have already endorsed Obama before the GOP has
picked a candidate.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation. -
Henry Kissinger
Politicians are people who, when t
"Especially their constituents. People are, in general, stupid, after all.
:D"
You're in luck then. From the presidency all the way down, they don't give
a damn about their constituents. Just the special interests.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I do not want my president..or any politician...to be submissive at
> allTO ANYONE."
>
> Including their constituents?
>
Especially their constituents. People are, in general, stupid, after all. :D
--
Scott Stroz
---
You
"I do not want my president..or any politician...to be submissive at
allTO ANYONE."
Including their constituents?
J
-
People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks
them. - Eric Hoffer
~|
Order
Hel...I have quoted scripture before and I am not even a Christian...
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 11:44 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11
ginal Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 11:29 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
Point is she is no more a fundamentalist than Obama is.
Obama has on several occasions quoted the scrip
Obama hasn't claimed that he hears the voices of invisible friends...Bush on
the otherhand...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:37 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Point is she is no more a fundamentalist than Obama is.
> Obama has on several occasions quoted the scriptures publicly.
There is a difference between quoting scripture to make a point and
believing the Bible is an accurate historical document and
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Point is she is no more a fundamentalist than Obama is.
>
Do you really believe that? Really, truly, and honestly...that when it comes
to religious fundamentalism, Barack Obama and Michell Bachmann are the
same?\
> Obama has on several occasions
Point is she is no more a fundamentalist than Obama is.
Obama has on several occasions quoted the scriptures publicly.
It's more like the Alinsky tactic:
"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:01 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> So your against voting for religious people.
RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISTS.
Sam, please do not add, change or remove words when quoting or replying to
me. I said religious fundamentalistspeople who read passages in the
Bible and quote them verbat
So your against voting for religious people. Funny how Obama probably
talks about the invisible man more than Bush ever did but hey, he was
never called a fundamentalist so he's golden.
Must be because the Church he sat in for so many years is friendlier.
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:31 AM, G Mo
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> You call such a vague statement perfect?
>
> To me it sounds like he said he refuses to support a Republican.
>
No, he refuses to support a religious fundamentalistand so do i.
~
You call such a vague statement perfect?
To me it sounds like he said he refuses to support a Republican.
.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:09 AM, G Money wrote:
>
>> > But then again, all
>> > the other fundamentalist views are why I wouldn't vote for her anyway,
>> > so the particulars of this on
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Judah McAuley
> wrote:
> > But then again, all
> > the other fundamentalist views are why I wouldn't vote for her anyway,
> > so the particulars of this one area are largely moot for me.
>
And that's all there is to it.
perfectly said.
~
It's so he can have sex parties with gay, underage hookers in the Lincoln
bedroom hehehe
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 10:28 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: I know I have slammed others for saying similar things
LOL!
LOL! Good one.
I think hubby undid the chain and ordered her to become president so
he can have parties in that really big house.
.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Dana wrote:
>>
>> LOL +1
>>
>>> I wish all these women who say a woman's place is the home, silent and
>>
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
