We are using CFMX Enterprise for some internal apps and the Oracle drivers work without a hitch.
So do you use BlueDragon for any of your production apps?If so, how do you like it?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10
We are using CFMX Enterprise for some internal apps and the
Oracle drivers work without a hitch.
Good. You'll want to perform the same sort of testing with BlueDragon, as
I'm guessing it uses a different set of JDBC drivers. In the event that you
have any problems with those drivers
Chris,
You should post this question on the BlueDragon-Interest mailing list,
you'll find many more BlueDragon users there than on this list:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index
.cfm
Of course, New Atlanta's web site is running on BlueDragon. So, yes, we
a virtual directory for BD and change some of the configuration for it. To quote from the article (see http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=42069):
--
Let's take stock of what you've done to your machine thus far. ColdFusion 5, ColdFusion MX, and BlueDragon are installed. Only ColdFusion MX is set
It's possible? Thanx in advance.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
On Sat, 2004-04-03 at 05:08, Spectrum Web wrote:
It's possible? Thanx in advance.
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/products/bluedragon-beta/download/home
Download the Installation Guide(pdf)
Look at section 3.2 Running Alongside ColdFusion and Servlet/JSP Engines
(
My xpdf program for some reason
Is Unicode supported in BlueDragon?If so, what is the extent of support?I checked New Atlanta's website but I don't see anything obvious.
--
Lola - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lolajl.net | Blog at http://www..lolajl.net/blog/
Terrorism delenda est! (Terrorism must be destroyed utterly
Hi Lola,
Yes, Unicode is supported in the BlueDragon 6.1 release, currently nearing
the end of beta testing (the final release should happen before the end of
April). Unicode is not supported in earlier releases of BlueDragon.
I'll ask the marketing folk to make this more clear on the web site
how far does bd 6.1 go in its i18n support? do you use cf style locales or
java's? fully support cultural formatting, etc.?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
: http:/www.coldgen.com/
_
From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2004 3:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
I just downloaded it too and it looks awesome, but am having problems
connecting to MSDE instances. I'm not sure where
Well it can't be any worse then EM. Might try it myself.
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep.Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability to talk
to a
wide variety of dbs.Of course, since it's not MS-specific, it doesn't
have all
the bells and whistles
On Friday 12 Mar 2004 07:35 am, Peter Tilbrook wrote:
Macromedia just recently released an updater to JRun 4 ('tis Updater 3)
which fixes numerous issues with JDBC drivers.
If anyone on the list has info on what environment the updater is best
applied on please let us know (eg: CFMX 6.1
At 12:32 PM -0800 3/10/04, Rob wrote:
I just downloaded it... awsome product :) better the pgaccess in my
opnion (for those of you on old postgres)
I would have to agree that this is a great product.And the developer is very responsive; there's a mailing list on Yahoogroups named aquadatastudio.
I have just started trying to use BlueDragon 6.1 beta on a
development box instead of macromedia coldfusion MX.One
thing I might be missing and am looking for some advise on
is within dreamweaver mx.
How do you set up your database tables using the bindings
tab when you have to sign on using
How do you set up your database tables using the bindings
tab when you have to sign on using RDS and BlueDragon does
not support it.Does this not disable a big feature of
dreamweaver mx when using BlueDragon or am I missing
something simple?
Yes, it disable that feature
Yes, it disable that feature
Then how do you do any database work using BlueDragon and
Dreamweaver?
davidBerry
BerryNet Design
Cell: 517-204-5454
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Then how do you do any database work using BlueDragon and
Dreamweaver?
Not having the Binding Panel enabled doesn't prevent you from making any
database work :-)
After all, you just edit text file, you could easily get rid of DW at all
and still be happy (many do
I use DWMX for all my coding but I don't think I've ever used it's features
for 'database' work, preferring to do it by hand...
-Original Message-
From: David Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 15:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
Yes, it disable
do it by hand. for sure.much faster/better/easier than any other ide could
give you
-Original Message-
From: John Beynon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
I use DWMX for all my coding but I don't
Plus you're in control of what's being written!!!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 15:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
do it by hand. for sure.much faster/better/easier than any other ide could
give you
Yes, it disable that feature
Then how do you do any database work using BlueDragon and
Dreamweaver?
We have DW and CFMX, but our server guys have disabled RDS for security
reasons. So it's not just BlueDragon users in this boat.
We write our own code.
-Kevin
[Todays Threads
Plus you're in control of what's being written!!!
You can use any code generator and still retain full control of what's being
written. It just require an extra investment since you need to know the way
the code generator works and tweak it to fit your needs (DW is very
extensible).
BTW CF MX
very interesting.. Altought I do code by hand I also
sometimes find the feature in the binding panels very handy
to use.I have also posted this on the blueDragon list so
see what there response is.
We have DW and CFMX, but our server guys have
disabled RDS for security
reasons. So it's
interesting.. Altought I do code by hand I also
sometimes find the feature in the binding panels very handy
to use.I have also posted this on the blueDragon list so
see what there response is.
We have DW and CFMX, but our server guys have
disabled RDS for security
reasons. So it's not just
Actually, the cool part of using DWMX (and CFS) here is that you can see the table/column names within the IDE. Not the generation of code!
Calvin
- Original Message -
From: Tony Weeg
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
do
or Access for.
-Matt
On Mar 10, 2004, at 11:11 AM, David Berry wrote:
very interesting.. Altought I do code by hand I also
sometimes find the feature in the binding panels very handy
to use. I have also posted this on the blueDragon list so
see what there response is.
We have DW and CFMX, but our
Yep, I use the same. It rocks.
Stace
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
I can't remember the last time I used RDS.There's a terrific tool
called Aqua Data Studio
that they were relying on
DWMX or Access for.
-Matt
On Mar 10, 2004, at 11:11 AM, David Berry wrote:
very interesting.. Altought I do code by hand I also
sometimes find the feature in the binding panels very handy
to use. I have also posted this on the blueDragon list so
see what
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep.Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability to talk to a
wide variety of dbs.Of course, since it's not MS-specific, it doesn't have all
the bells and whistles of EM, but it's the best thing out there if you have to
in this software.
-Frank
- Original Message -
From: Rob
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep.Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability to talk to a
wide variety
in this software.
I don't know about BlueDragon specifically, but with CFMX you can't use
Windows authentication through the MS SQL Server JDBC driver. If you need to
use Windows authentication, you'd have to use the ODBC Socket driver, and I
wouldn't recommend that.
As for separate SQL Server/MSDE
that option in this software.
I don't know about BlueDragon specifically, but with CFMX you
can't use Windows authentication through the MS SQL Server
JDBC driver. If you need to use Windows authentication, you'd
have to use the ODBC Socket driver, and I wouldn't recommend that.
Oops, I didn't
nicely out of the box on postgres
7.2 - though there was no box)
... you know there were a lot of abbreviations in that; let me know if I
can help.
-Frank
- Original Message -
From: Rob
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
Rob MSDE is Microsoft SQL Desktop Engine.
Aqua Data is the way to go.I have learned allot from you all today.
Thanks! ~dB
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
On Wed, 2004
To get the number of active sessions in BlueDragon, use the following:
cfset
AppMgr=CreateObject(java,com.naryx.tagfusion.cfm.application.cfAPPLICATIO
N)
cfset Sessions=AppMgr.getSessionCount()
Note that this gives the total number of sessions, and not the number of
sessions for a particular
Am getting this error:
Type Template
Message Missing start tag
Tag /CFHTTP
Position Line=24; Column=53
Detail The tag /cfhttp had no corresponding opening tag
Source 21: URLToPull= http://www.easycfm.com/syndication/EasyFeed.xml;
22: /cfscript
23:
24: cfhttp url="" method=GET timeout=15/cfhttp
Hi Peter,
For the first one, if you remove the closing /cfhttp tag it will remove
the error (the closing /cfhttp tag is unnecessary; if you remove it your
code is still compatible with CF5/MX). This issue is documented in the
BlueDragon CFML Compatibility Guide:
BlueDragon does not support
Hi Rick,
You might want to post this question to the BlueDragon-Interest mailing
list, since that's where most BlueDragon users gather:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index
.cfm
Also, be sure to ask about BlueDragon's advantages compared to CF5/CFMX
For the first one, if you remove the closing /cfhttp tag it will remove
the error (the closing /cfhttp tag is unnecessary; if you remove it your
code is still compatible with CF5/MX). This issue is documented in the
BlueDragon CFML Compatibility Guide:
BlueDragon does not support closing tags
I am looking at BlueDragon Server JX and wanted to here what everyone thinks
about it.
What are its faults Compared to CF5/CFMX?
Thank you
Rick
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Greetings!
The second beta of BlueDragon 6.1 is now available for download:
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/products/bluedragon-beta/download/home
In addition to numerous bug fixes, the search feature (CFCOLLECTION,
CFINDEX, and CFSEARCH) is now integrated in this release.
Note that these are full
We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheaper alternative than CFMX.
While that is certainly one difference between BlueDragon and
ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
6.1's availability around
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:56 pm, Matt Liotta wrote:
We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheaper alternative than CFMX.
choice and BlueDragon's strong showing as of 6.1 just made that choice
a lot harder than it used to be by implemented much of CFMX.
:nods
That's one of the things that has
Matt wrote:
ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
Any chance of elaboration on that point?Main advantages/disadvantages?
-dc
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt wrote:
ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
Any chance of elaboration on that point?Main advantages/disadvantages?
The cost advantage is even larger if you want
that would cover things. However, maybe if others chime in we can all
get a more thorough list.
The disadvantages list is pretty easy I think. Anything CFMX does that
BlueDragon doesn't would be on that list. I believe the BlueDragon
compatibility guide does a good job of explaining
I was hoping to present a Flex or Central presentation at the next meeting
on December 10. Of course I was one of the many not accepted to the beta and
the NDA would no doubt be problematic.
Instead I have chosed to present BlueDragon 6.1 (beta). We need to keep CFML
alive and BlueDragon will go
New Atlanta now have a beta version of BlueDragon 6.1 available that not only follows CFMX's
version numbering but also adds some of the MX-specific features like CFCs, web services and XML
processing. I think this is a good indication that the CF community really do like these features
(New
New Atlanta is pleased to announce the beta1 release of BlueDragon 6.1,
which is now available for download and testing:
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/products/bluedragon-beta/download/home
Among the many new features added to BlueDragon 6.1 are:
- CFCs
- Web Services
- XML
- Tag-based UDFs
For those interested, the problem was determined to be specifically a
problem not with CFHTTP in general (in BlueDragon) but instead one of doing
CFHTTP from a page on our internal web server calling to a page on IIS. We
are investigating this particular bug and hope to have it fixed as a part
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 October 2003 13:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFHTTP Posts with Bluedragon free
Thanks for the suggestion Kola,
Have tried it on 5.0 and 6.1 , it works without issue.
Craig.
-Original Message-
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 October 2003
Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 October 2003 13:13
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFHTTP Posts with Bluedragon free
Craig could it perhaps be something to do with the size? I
noticed you
said the packets are quite large. Does it work with smaller
packets?
Does it work for non XML calls
Hi Craig,
I've forwarded your issue to the BlueDragon Product Interest
List.
You may want to join the list for more direct interaction
with our engineers:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/arch
ive_search/index.cfm
Regards,
Dan
Daniel Ganter
New Atlanta Communications
Cheers Daniel, I have subscribed.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Ganter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 October 2003 14:13
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFHTTP Posts with Bluedragon free
Hi Craig,
I've forwarded your issue to the BlueDragon Product Interest
List.
You may
with Bluedragon free
While I never usually use cfhttp, a particular client wishes to use
Bluedragon 3.0 free edition as a bridge for his internal system and our
web server, I'm formatting xml packets form his queries and posting to
our box, or trying to.
I simply cannot get CFHTTP to POST at all, GET's work
Thanks for the suggestion Kola,
Have tried it on 5.0 and 6.1 , it works without issue.
Craig.
-Original Message-
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 October 2003 13:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFHTTP Posts with Bluedragon free
As a suggestion, why don't
FYI, you might be interested to know that the following web site is running
on BlueDragon Server JX (all of the .htm pages are really dynamic CFML
pages being served by BlueDragon--there are no static pages on the site):
http://www.linuxworld.com
That server has the following configuration
P.S. For those of you who might be skeptical:
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.linuxworld.com
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al.
FYI, you
I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project and considering usingBlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am not misreadinganything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drivers, costs nothing interms of a license. Can anyone (maybe from New Atlanta) confirm this isaccurate? Also
26, 2003 10:20 AMTo: CF-TalkSubject: Bluedragon Licensing et al.I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project and considering usingBlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am not misreadinganything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drivers, costs nothing interms of a license. Can
I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project andconsidering usingBlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am notmisreadinganything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drivers,costs nothing interms of a license. Can anyone (maybe from New Atlanta)confirm this isaccurate?Correct.The
-Talk Subject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al. The free version of BD server is free to use. In development or production/deployment. I have a copy of it (3.0.2) running on a Linux Mandrake serverfor a community project that we're building. So far I'm still in development. haven't really had
I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project and considering usingBlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am not misreadinganything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drivers, costs nothing interms of a license. Can anyone (maybe from New Atlanta) confirm this isaccurate?Trying
Mike,The license is for a server, with norestrictions on the number of cpus.The definitive source for use of BlueDragon Serveris the Software License Agreement (SLA).Regards,DanDaniel GanterNew Atlanta Communicationswww.newatlanta.com-Original Message-From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL
You could try posting on this listhttp://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index.cfmI may be wrong, I'm not sure.I also just checked through the site and didn't find any reference tomultiple CPUs for the free version.This is all I found, with reference to multiple
Alright, thanks Daniel, I appreciate the help. M -Original Message- From: Daniel Ganter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 9:54 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al. Mike, The license is for a server, with no restrictions on the number of cpus
Ah there is the answer.:-)Hey, my board supports multiple CPUs. might be an idea for us over hereeventually.- Yves --Original Message-From: Daniel Ganter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: September 26, 2003 10:54 AMTo: CF-TalkSubject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al.Mike,The license
I'm working on a migration plan for a Linux server I manage... and while it
is logical for us to move to RedHat 9 at this time, we are also looking at
BlueDragon --and it does not appear that it supports this version of Linux.
Has anybody installed it successfully on this OS? What about later
On Tuesday 02 Sep 2003 16:02 pm, Jillian Carroll wrote:
Has anybody installed it successfully on this OS? What about later
versions of Apache (they recommend 1.3.27)
If it's only the Apache that is the sticking point, go get a copy of
ApacheTool box and roll your own (rpm) of Apache 1.3, as
points are absolutely valid from the perspective of a custom project--a
few hundred dollars isn't really going to make a difference. But, let's say
you've built a packaged solution written in CFML that you'd like to sell
for $1200/server. Guess what? Prior to BlueDragon you had to add another
$1300
Yes, BlueDragon 3.0.2 is supported on Red Hat 9 (though I'm not sure if the
web site has been updated to reflect this). Of course, when it's released
BlueDragon 3.1 will also run on Red Hat 9.
BlueDragon 3.1 will support Apache 2.0, as well as the older Apache 1.3.x
releases.
Vince Bonfanti
New
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SW Costs, BlueDragon, etc. (was:DWMX 2004 - Whats new for
us?)
Jim Davis wrote:
True. I'm not arguing against Blue Dragon but rather
, and indeed the challenges (in the Compatibility Guide). We also
offer a BlueDragon-Interest list where both New Atlanta engineers and
customers discuss the product in a friendly, responsive environment.
As for MX features, again, the bulk of those are slated for our Release 4
version, later this year
Greetings!
The BlueDragon 3.0.2 service pack has been released and is available for
download:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/download.jsp
This service pack contains over 70 bug fixes and performance enhancements.
Regards,
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http
Hi,
I apologize if this question is redundant, it didnt seem to clearly
process into my head, or I haven't had enough coffee today ;)
BD website states: Package portable CFML applications within standard
J2EE Web ARchive (WAR) and Enterprise ARchive (EAR) files;
Is this feature available in
BD website states: Package portable CFML applications
within standard J2EE Web ARchive (WAR) and Enterprise
ARchive (EAR) files;
Is this feature available in all versions of BD? Or just
specific ones? I think as a developer, it would be amazing
to be able to whip up a self-installing
Dave,
Thanks, I just slammed my head into my keyboard. What I meant to ask
about was the Compiled Binary Deployment feature.
BD apparently compiles all the code into one binary executable that can
be distributed. I am wondering if someone can point me to some
documentation on the feature,
will popup to explain but my understanding is that BD
compiles CFML to a binary format - an internal BlueDragon format -
and then lets you create archive files containing that binary code...
which you then have to deploy on a J2EE server.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're
I see,
I was hoping it would compile the cfml templates into an all in one binary executable
that included the webserver in it for easy distribution.
Appreciate the insight sean, look forward to Vince's reply.
Jas
~|
Archives:
Jas,
We have a pilot project under way with a select number of BlueDragon
customers to do exactly what you want to do. I'll contact you privately to
discuss the details.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
-Original Message-
From: Jas Panesar
Vince,
I would be very interested in participating in such a program -- looking forward to
your reply.
Jas
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
On Saturday 22 Feb 2003 17:10 pm, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
The only conflict to watch out for is when you go to install a web server
adapter to IIS or Apache--in that case you can only have one of
BlueDragon/CFMX/CF5 attached to the web server.
But you can just use ProxyPass or mod_rewrite
The only conflict to watch out for is when you go to
install a web server adapter to IIS or Apache--in that
case you can only have one of BlueDragon/CFMX/CF5
attached to the web server.
But you can just use ProxyPass or mod_rewrite to map the
server on port 8500 into the URI space
|
| You don't even have to do that. You can just enable BlueDragon or CFMX or
| CF5 within specific virtual servers or directories, on Apache or IIS.
|
| Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
| http://www.figleaf.com/
| voice: (202) 797-5496
| fax: (202) 797-5444
|
I would be interested
You don't even have to do that. You can just enable
BlueDragon or CFMX or CF5 within specific virtual
servers or directories, on Apache or IIS.
I would be interested in seeing more details on this
feature
I've described this more than once on this list, I'm sure, so it's probably
On Saturday, February 22, 2003, at 10:24 AM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
Note that the BlueDragon implementation is via the new PAGE attribute
of the
CFINCLUDE tag (and not via the GetPageContext function), which allows
you to
include the output of JSP pages or servlets in a CFML page
On Saturday, Feb 22, 2003, at 07:24 US/Pacific, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
My apologies--CFMX does indeed offer similar capabilities as
BlueDragon in
this regard. It was an oversight on my part, and not a deliberate
attempt to
mislead.
No problem. I expected it was just an oversight. I've been
interested, we'll be demonstrating BlueDragon for
.NET in our booth at MXNorth (the first ever public demonstration).
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24
I ahev installed Blue Dragon Server on my WinXP machine at the house with
excellent results, but I have tried to run it at work on our Win2K server
with IIS 5.0 and I have some issues... Maybe one of you know why...
When I hit http://localhost with my machine I get the Blue Dragon Default
page...
crashes when I go there later.
Does this make sense?
Eric
From: Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:10:31 -0500
Yes CFMX and BlueDragon (and CF5) can all peacefully co
Hi Eric,
See responses inserted below.
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
When I install on a machine without IIS v5, it asks me if I
want
a couple of things.
So I don't quite remember its history. I may install from scratch.
I am running w2k, ntfs. cleaning registry now...
Eric
From: Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
Date: Mon
-Original Message-
From: AJ W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 6:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
I hope that New Atlanta has worked on the compatibility
problems I was seeing last year. I was quick to try out Blue
Dragon
My apologies--CFMX does indeed offer similar capabilities as BlueDragon in
this regard. It was an oversight on my part, and not a deliberate attempt to
mislead.
Note that the BlueDragon implementation is via the new PAGE attribute of the
CFINCLUDE tag (and not via the GetPageContext function
Vince,
I apologize if I missed your response on this, but my question was if CFMX
and BlueDragon can co-exist on a development server for testing and maybe
access blue dragon on a port other that 80?
Thanks,
Frank Mamone
- Original Message -
From: Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes CFMX and BlueDragon (and CF5) can all peacefully co-exist on the same
machine.
CFMX has a built-in web server that runs on port 8500 by default. BlueDragon
Server has a built-in web server that runs on port 8080 by default--as long
as you don't have anything already installed using port 8080
Howdy,
Is anyone hosting third-party commercial sites running under BlueDragon
yet? If so, is there a list of BlueDragon hosts anywhere?
--
Chris Montgomerymonty airtightweb.com
Airtight Web Services http://www.airtightweb.com
Web Development, Web Project Management, Software Sales
Contact Aaron Z. Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] about it.
Also, there's a seperate BlueDragon list on House of Fusion where BD specific
issues can be discussed. Hosting, install, admin and the like are perfect for
that list. In addition, there's a list on the DB site itself.
Howdy,
Is anyone hosting
-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
Wow. The 'free' part doesn't extend to a production box, right? Not
sure about the definition of 'deployment
Yes, absolutely it extends to a production box. You may use the BlueDragon
Server free edition however you want, for no charge. The only thing you
can't do is redistribute it--for that you'll need an OEM/VAR agreement
(pricing will be very reasonable, or even free depending on what you want to
do
601 - 700 of 912 matches
Mail list logo
